From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 01:58:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220683] Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010158.l811wXvh018756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygems - the Ruby standard for packaging ruby libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220683 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 21:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 02:00:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010200.l8120sEU024986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 22:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 02:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253434] Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010206.l8126l58019927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rpm-editor - RPM Specfile editor for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 22:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 02:11:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010211.l812BQRv026324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-08-31 22:11 EST ------- Thanks, I agree completely. :) Addressed the above, rpmlint is now clean. Sorry for the delay, life has been complicated lately. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/armacycles-ad/armacycles-ad-0.2.8.2.1-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 02:09:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010209.l8129BV2025772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-08-31 22:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > NEED:- > > Use of macros. > > What macros in particular aren't being used that are needed by the guidelines? Ah. ok. I thought we also hvae %{_sbindir} macro which replaces /usr/sbin > > > Change Buildroot to current one. > > Buildroot is one of the three acceptable ones ohh. I forgot its not mandatory now from packaging guidelines "At one point, the second was a mandatory value, but it is now left to the packager to decide." > > > update license tag > > Updated ok > > > Can use dist tag. > > Given that squashfs-tools depends on kernel version and isn't synchronized > across branches, the dist tag doesn't buy anything really ok. > > > Also, rpmlint on binary rpm reported as > > W: squashfs-tools summary-not-capitalized squashfs utilities > > Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. > > Fixed > > > W: squashfs-tools invalid-license GPL > > Fixed > > > W: squashfs-tools spurious-executable-perm > > And fixed all of these Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 02:10:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010210.l812AlkO020519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 22:10 EST ------- cvs done. Thank you for addressing the Conflicts. I think this is a much nicer package now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 03:10:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010310.l813ATic028836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-08-31 23:10 EST ------- >How is this done? Just rebuild cryptsetup-luks with name cryptsetup and a >cryptsetup.spec? Well, you need to do a cvsrequest to make the new module, but then yes, you just import the new name and spec. >And are you sure that this will not break anything because there is already a >cryptsetup component in Bugzilla? (There was a cryptsetup packege in FC 2 and 3) >according to http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/cryptsetup/?root=core Well, I don't think so since they are so old... are there any open bugs on that name? You might have to deal with them... >And do I have to manually copy the acls from PackageDB into a fedora-cvs >request template? Yeah, at least as far as I know. I can ask if perhaps someone could copy it over in the database or something if it's difficult to request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 03:28:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 272501] Review Request: < python-bsddb3> - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010328.l813S3pA004374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: < python-bsddb3> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272501 440volt.tux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: < python- |Review Request: < python- |bsddb3> - - |for BerkeleyDB 3.x and 4.x> ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-08-31 23:28 EST ------- This is my first package. I need sponser so that i can continue packaging . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 04:48:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 00:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010448.l814mn25013098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-01 00:48 EST ------- After checking maildrop/buffer.C (where compilation failed) and configure, it turned out that this was due to "BuildRequies: gawk" :( I think the compilation log should be more verbose, not just showing the message "Compiling maildirmake.c" or so so that we can check if compilation flags are honored correctly. The following should work (see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=144270 ) ------------------------------------------------- for f in `find . -name Makefile.in` ; do sed -i.silent -e 's|@echo |echo |' -e 's|@rm |rm |' $f done ------------------------------------------------- I will check later if there are any issues else to be fixed later -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 06:55:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 02:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010655.l816tN8C021404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-09-01 02:55 EST ------- Good: + follows python template + name version release good + license (GPLv2+) + source matches upstream + builds on x86_64 + rpmlint clean + %clean section + .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 08:05:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 04:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010805.l8185F46004165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-01 04:05 EST ------- The latest version looks fine, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 08:29:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 04:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225667] Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709010829.l818TlUD001332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cryptsetup-luks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225667 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-01 04:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Well, I don't think so since they are so old... are there any open bugs on that > name? You might have to deal with them... There was one open bug which was meant to be filed against cryptsetup-luks and I guess the reporter was confused with the two components. I only noticed it by coincidence. This seems not to be well handled, two. E.g. there seems no way to become initialCC of cryptsetup now, because it is not in the PackageDB. I guess the same problem will occur the other way round when cryptsetup-luks will be renamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 10:29:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 06:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236041] Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011029.l81ATEGR026475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libx86 - libx86 library from X https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236041 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Core |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-01 06:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Don't worry about this one, I need to do some serious surgery here first. I'll > file a new bug when I have something usable. Can you please reopen this bug or add me to CC when you do this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 10:47:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 06:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] New: Gnome Main Menu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Summary: Gnome Main Menu Product: Fedora Version: f7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karl at nncc.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Somewhat disheartened by the recent closure of bug #199681 I've put together some new RPMs for gnome-main-menu, this package was built against revision 317 in the gnome svn server. spec: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu.spec rpm: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.8-1.i386.rpm src: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.8-1.src.rpm dev: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.8-1.i386.rpm dbg: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.8-1.i386.rpm There are only really a few minor differences with the current trunk, some of the bookmarks named differently etc... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 10:49:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 06:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199681] Review Request: slab In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011049.l81AnDad030581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199681 ------- Additional Comments From karl at nncc.info 2007-09-01 06:49 EST ------- As requested, I've taken up building a new package for this, it is almost complete. You can check it out over at bug #273701. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 11:36:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 07:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011136.l81Ba2GI001868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 sangu at hellocity.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sangu at hellocity.net ------- Additional Comments From sangu at hellocity.net 2007-09-01 07:36 EST ------- Error: Missing Dependency $ sudo yum install gnome-main-menu-0.9.8-1.i386.rpm Repository development is listed more than once in the configuration Repository development-debuginfo is listed more than once in the configuration Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Examining gnome-main-menu-0.9.8-1.i386.rpm: gnome-main-menu - 0.9.8-1.i386 Marking gnome-main-menu-0.9.8-1.i386.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package gnome-main-menu.i386 0:0.9.8-1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libiw.so.28 for package: gnome-main-menu --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libiw.so.28 is needed by package gnome-main-menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 12:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] New: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/tomcat-native.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/tomcat-native-1.1.10-0.2.cmn7.src.rpm Tomcat can use the Apache Portable Runtime to provide superior scalability, performance, and better integration with native server technologies. The Apache Portable Runtime is a highly portable library that is at the heart of Apache HTTP Server 2.x. APR has many uses, including access to advanced IO functionality (such as sendfile, epoll and OpenSSL), OS level functionality (random number generation, system status, etc), and native process handling (shared memory, NT pipes and Unix sockets). This package contains the Tomcat native library which provides support for using APR in Tomcat. rpmlint: W: tomcat-native devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtcnative-1.so Due to how Tomcat/Java loads the lib, unversioned *.so is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 12:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011229.l81CT0b4012370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Summary|Gnome Main Menu |Review Request: gnome-main- | |menu - Gnome Main Menu ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-01 08:28 EST ------- imho the summary tag should be more descriptive than only repeating the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 12:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011241.l81Cfu49021024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-01 08:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. The license field says GPLv2+, but I believe it should be GPL+ > > > 2. Not a blocker but I suggest converting README from iso-8859-1 to UTF8. > > Both fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/maniadrive-data-1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 12:44:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 08:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251826] Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011244.l81Ci5cK015528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-music - Replacement soundtrack for the non free ManiaDrive soundtrack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251826 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-01 08:44 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:28:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011328.l81DSaxZ025470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:31:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011331.l81DVx1f026424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:31:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011331.l81DVtOE026397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:31:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244411] Review Request: rpmorphan - rpmorphan list the orphaned rpm packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011331.l81DVmHc026367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmorphan - rpmorphan list the orphaned rpm packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244411 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:32:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011332.l81DW7os026466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011337.l81DbTET000792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mozldap Alias: mozldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196401 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219869] Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011337.l81DbSUW000759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mozilla-LDAP Alias: perldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219869 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name BugsThisDependsOn|163779 | OtherBugsDependingO| |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-01 09:37 EST ------- FE-ACCEPT should be blocked, not being depended on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 13:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 09:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226411] Merge Review: setserial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011334.l81DYRWH026812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: setserial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226411 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name BugsThisDependsOn|163779 | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-01 09:34 EST ------- depending on FE-ACCEPT is wrong, blocking it is not needed when fedora-review+ is set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 14:15:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 272501] Review Request: python-bsddb3 - Python interface for BerkeleyDB 3.x and 4.x In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011415.l81EFBDP008965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bsddb3 - Python interface for BerkeleyDB 3.x and 4.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=272501 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: < python- |Review Request: python- |bsddb3> - |for BerkeleyDB 3.x and 4.x ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-01 10:15 EST ------- You need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR to show that you need a sponsor, also you need an account in the Fedora Account System, for more details read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 14:15:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011415.l81EFiLs003666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 davidz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidz at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-09-01 10:15 EST ------- You need wireless-tools-devel as a BR. Also, why is it bringing in gdk-pixbuf? The latter is unfortunate as it pulls in the GTK 1.x stack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 14:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] New: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mencal/mencal.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mencal/mencal-2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Mencal is a simple variation of the well-known unix command cal. The main difference is that you can have some periodically repeating days highlighted in color. This can be used to track menstruation (or other) cycles conveniently. Easy review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 14:53:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011453.l81ErhBf016825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-01 10:53 EST ------- Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 14:55:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011455.l81EtRd6017507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-01 10:55 EST ------- Please rebuild also on FC-6 and F-7. For F-7, please request a release push using Bodhi system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 14:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011456.l81EuGiM012193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-01 10:56 EST ------- Please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 15:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011500.l81F03kC018626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249522 kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 15:27:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011527.l81FRUIH018598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-01 11:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SPECS/eclipse-rse.spec SRPM URL: http://download.tuxfamily.org/borsalino/7/SRPMS/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm - Don't build the debug package. - Fix the License tag. - Fix Required-Start/Stop in the initscript according with /FCNewInit/Initscripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 15:32:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011532.l81FWdXY025408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From davidz at redhat.com 2007-09-01 11:32 EST ------- In fact, turns out the gdk-pixbuf BR is bogus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 15:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011531.l81FVQ1Q025214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-01 11:31 EST ------- Oups, I no more update the specfile there, here are the correct paths. Spec: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eclipse-rse.spec SRPM: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 15:33:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254135] Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011533.l81FX2wT019747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpanelappletmm - C++ interface for Gnome panel applets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254135 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 15:34:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011534.l81FYh64025728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 11:34 EST ------- Changing from NEW to ASSIGNED since Ignacio started the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:06:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011606.l81G6L6c000399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011606.l81G6Kpj000349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011606.l81G6IJI032753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 12:06 EST ------- Removing old FE-REVIEW blocker and changed from NEW to ASSIGNED since the review flag is set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:04:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219889] Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011604.l81G4KnT026376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bootchart - a utility for profiling the boot process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219889 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 12:04 EST ------- Removing old FE-REVIEW blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225637] Merge Review: castor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011611.l81GBOIZ028166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: castor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225637 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 12:11 EST ------- Same remark as Kevin, here. I guess it's an oversight, so I'm changing from NEW to ASSIGNED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011609.l81G9lek027529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdrdao https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 12:09 EST ------- Ping? Now that cdrtools has been replaced, maybe this can easily be sorted out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 16:23:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 12:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011623.l81GNc4H030539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-01 12:23 EST ------- For 2.0.4-3: * Missing BR: - Add "gawk" for BuildRequires. * Compilation log - Make compilation log verbose so that we can check if Fedora specific compilation flags are honored correctly. * rpmlint: From rpmlint: A. -------------------------------------------------------- E: maildrop setuid-binary /usr/bin/maildrop root 06755 (and similar lines) -------------------------------------------------------- ? Just to confirm, would you explain why these binaries should have setuid/setgid? B. --------------------------------------------------------- W: maildrop invalid-license GPL --------------------------------------------------------- - Please update license tag. C. --------------------------------------------------------- W: maildrop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librfc2045.so.0.0.0 rfc2047_qp_allow_any W: maildrop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/librfc822.so.0.0.0 unicode_ISO8859_1 ( and similar lines omittted) --------------------------------------------------------- - libraries in -devel subpackage contains undefined non-weak symbols (also can be checked by "ldd -r"). This is unpleasant because this causes linkage failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 17:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011719.l81HJTAn009824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 18:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 14:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011803.l81I3jVn018866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(than at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 18:01:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 14:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225634] Merge Review: cadaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011801.l81I1fDW018618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cadaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225634 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matthias at rpmforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 14:01 EST ------- The current package looks already quite good. A few minor possible spec file changes : - Remove the zero epoch from the neon-devel BR - Include a quick comment as to why pie is needed - Change %defattr(-,root,root) to the more usual %defattr(-,root,root,-) (pretty useless, though, since the package doesn't include directories) - Move the %doc line up so that it isn't in between two normal lines I'll test a build and post the results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 18:07:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 14:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011807.l81I7RqK019790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-01 14:07 EST ------- I'm a little confused. Who is the initial owner and who is doing the review? :-) Seems like Behdad is the initial owner and Matthias the reviewer, but then shouldn't the bug be assigned to Matthias and Behdad the one doing the changes on the package? And be ASSIGNED instead of NEW? If you're co-maintainers and need an "external" reviewer, I volunteer ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 19:02:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709011902.l81J2btH003804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-01 15:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: audio-convert-mod Short Description: A simple audio file converter supporting many formats Owners: firewing Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: firewing Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 20:23:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709012023.l81KNFo2014321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-01 16:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gkrellm New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: scop,jwrdegoede As discussed in private mail with Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 20:43:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709012043.l81Khk6s023792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-01 16:43 EST ------- Forgot to set the flag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 20:40:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709012040.l81KeQL0018076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-09-01 16:40 EST ------- It seems that /usr/lib64/libslab.so.0.0.0 creates a comflict with control-center-2.18.0-20.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 1 23:04:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709012304.l81N4vvE013500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 odvorace at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(odvorace at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From odvorace at redhat.com 2007-09-01 19:04 EST ------- Hi, I'm working on it. Cheers Ondrej -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 02:04:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709020204.l822464s014763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-01 22:04 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 08:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 04:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709020845.l828jBMl022555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mencal-review AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 09:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 05:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709020901.l8291Vxv028675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 09:00:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 05:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709020900.l8290FpS028502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-02 05:00 EST ------- Review for release 1.fc6: All packaging quidelines are met, most notably * Package name is fine, the tarball matches upstream and is the latest version * Builds fine in mock and rpmlint is silent on on the output packages * SPEC file is clean, legible, and text is in American English * The package uses perl, but no externally packaged modules -- Dependencies are correct APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 09:22:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 05:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709020922.l829MmFg031065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 09:19:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 05:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709020919.l829JRNp030486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-09-02 05:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mencal Short Description: Menstruation calendar Owners: mmahut at redhat.com Branches: devel, F-7, FC-6 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 10:04:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 06:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021004.l82A46BA031284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 dom at earth.li changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dom at earth.li ------- Additional Comments From dom at earth.li 2007-09-02 06:04 EST ------- In case it's useful, you may wish to cross-reference with my Mapnik Debian packages: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/mapnik . Upstream is still a bit unsure about versioned sonames - for the time being I'm using a private soname scheme as you can see from the package. Re Comment #14 - do get in touch if you need any coordination (apologies if I missed an email before). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 10:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 06:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021048.l82AmBbQ007918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2007-09-02 06:48 EST ------- New packages at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mondo-2.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mondo-2.2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm I have rebuild the packages and they work just fine. Someone here to do the formal packaging checks? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 10:46:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 06:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021046.l82AkWYF003654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2007-09-02 06:46 EST ------- New packages at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mindi-1.2.4-1.fc7.src.rpm ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mindi-1.2.4-1.fc6.src.rpm ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/mindi-busybox-1.2.2-3.fc6.src.rpm Working yum repo at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/7/fedora-mondo.repo ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/6/fedora-mondo.repo Is there still someone looking for this? I'd love to see this in the standard repository. Bruno, could you give some more information what makes it difficult to use the busybox package that's already in the repository? What specific additions or fixes did you add that can't go in the main branch? I'm just curious here and trying to build a bridge... Where are the source packages for afio and buffer? Wouldn't these be needed as well in Fedora and thus should also go through review? Could neither find .src.rpm nor review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 14:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021418.l82EIf3x031095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-02 10:18 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kftpgrabber New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 14:51:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021451.l82Epl6d002317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-02 10:51 EST ------- There were a new upstream release in July. I've packaged these version (0.6.1) and it seems to run fine now (tested on f7 x86_64). New URLs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/klear/klear.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/klear/klear-0.6.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 16:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021610.l82GAUFh007385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-09-02 12:10 EST ------- Looks good, package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 16:55:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021655.l82GtSwE012414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdrdao https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-02 12:55 EST ------- Yes, sorry for slacking off on this one. Will finalize review tonight or tomorrow. I've been thinking about the future of cdrdao lately. I've worked a little on gcdmaster, but done very little maintenance work on cdrdao. I looked at a port to either cdrkit and libburn, but cdrkit doesn't have anything close to a development API, and libburn lives at a higher layer (and is not very stable yet), so it looks as though using the packaged cdrtools library is still the top option as of now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 17:11:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021711.l82HBaVq014163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-02 13:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maniadrive-data Short Description: Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel only! InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Yes, really devel only, this depends on other packages only in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 17:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021715.l82HFxA7018218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-02 13:15 EST ------- OK, now I finally have some time. This all looks good to me now, except for one thing. When you apply patch1, the backup file is left in there and installed: E: perl-Geo-IP wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/perl-Geo-IP-1.28/example/netspeed.pl.netspeed "/usr/local/bin/perl" It should be trivial to nuke this or to remove the "-b .netspeed" bit. Otherwise everything looks good, and to avoid another round trip I'll just approve this now and you can fix the issue when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 17:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021727.l82HRCLV019448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-09-02 13:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > /usr/share/raydium/rayphp/README > > > It doesn't contain any info usefull to the enduser. I that case it probably shouldn't be installed at all. The latest version still installs this file, maybe just an oversight. Apart from the above, I'm happy with the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 17:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230802] Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021730.l82HUCcv016224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Callback - Object interface for function callbacks Alias: perl-Callback https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230802 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-02 13:30 EST ------- The package has now been pushed to F7. This ticket should be closed by the submitter, but I see no reason why it should stay open and in the interests of expediency and keeping my overly long open ticket list down I'll go ahead and close this myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 17:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 13:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021742.l82Hg3Hq021278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-02 13:42 EST ------- Oh, man, somehow I missed that last notification and let this sit around for another two weeks. Too much bugspam, I guess. I'm really sorry about that; you should have felt free to ping me if I didn't get back after a couple of days. Everything builds OK, compiler flags and debuginfo look good to me, and the license tag is fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 18:13:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021813.l82IDpOb024535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-02 14:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I that case it probably shouldn't be installed at all. The latest version still > installs this file, maybe just an oversight. > Ok, I'll add a line to rm it to %install before importing, can you approve it as is then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 18:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021849.l82InO2g028441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-09-02 14:49 EST ------- You now have to specify which version of the license, from README it seems GPLv2+. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing The check gives: Don't have ghostscript, ignoring postscript test. SKIP: postscript-check.sh Don't have ghostscript, skipping PDF test. SKIP: pdf-check.sh I suggest a BuildRequire, checks are good. What exactly is the # install libgeotiff comment in the spec for? I can't see anything of that description in the tarball. Instead of Transforming in the Summary, try Transforms. Makes better grammatical sense I think. Good: + builds on F7 x86_64 + source matches upstream + follows template + uses macros + %clean section + %files section with defattr and using macros + smp flags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 18:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709021859.l82Ix5FP025794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-09-02 14:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, I'll add a line to rm it to %install before importing, can you approve it as > is then? No problem, in that case the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 21:10:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 17:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709022110.l82LA3LZ011595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-02 17:10 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maniadrive Short Description: 3D stunt driving game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: devel (only, others mis deps) InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 22:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709022232.l82MWHHv017080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-02 18:32 EST ------- Thanks Jason, no worries - I've been busy too. If this were anywhere near the top of my list of priorities, I'd have pinged you. :) Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 2 22:38:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709022238.l82McUkm017761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-09-02 18:38 EST ------- OK; some signs of progress, but not quite a solution (yet): - The name change is clearly your call, but is there any reason to single out plugins as a special case of add on, or would you want to have a full set of e.g: gimp-plugin-XXXX gimp-brush-XXXX gimp-pattern-XXXX I'm not sure there's a way to keep it consistent without having a proliferation of special cases in the naming guidelines. - The build failure: it does indeed appear to be a 2.4 change, and while I haven't 100% confirmed, it looks to be the same as this Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439469 so it looks like it might be a problem in Gimp itself. I'm going to test the Debian patch and if I then get a successful build of resynthesizer I'll file the appropriate bug on the Gimp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 02:48:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030248.l832mBvM015592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253161 nThis| | BugsThisDependsOn|253161 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 02:48:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030248.l832mDNw015620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253161 nThis| | BugsThisDependsOn|253161 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 02:51:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030251.l832ppVF016191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-09-02 22:51 EST ------- How to resolve the first warning? I see gedit, pidgin all have this problem. I will change the License tag to GPLv3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 03:32:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 23:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030332.l833WZxh017399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-02 23:32 EST ------- add %config to %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/*.schemas --> %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/*.schemas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 03:42:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 23:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030342.l833gcUx018553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-02 23:42 EST ------- I can't see updated SPEC in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 03:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 23:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030345.l833jjXu019081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-09-02 23:45 EST ------- OK, cvs updated. No rpmlint warning now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 04:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 00:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030420.l834KGBL025894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-03 00:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > add %config to %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/*.schemas > > --> > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/*.schemas > Well.. gconf schemas is actually not a config file and we usually don't mark this as %config. http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-April/msg00333.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 04:26:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 00:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030426.l834QZgP026577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 00:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > add %config to %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/*.schemas > > > > --> > > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/*.schemas > > > > Well.. gconf schemas is actually not a config file and we > usually don't mark this as %config. > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-April/msg00333.html thanks for pointing that. So still no decision has been made on this issue. Also ,rpmlint bug is waiting for some conclusion. Zhu, Can you please revert back changes in %files section to remove %config(noreplace)? Also, Can't see changelog updated in SPEC? why following files is not added to %doc? COPYING Changelog Doc/FAQ Doc/HACKING doc/HowToCreateDictionary doc/StarDictFileFormat doc/Translation Also, Is it good to add test directory to %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 05:50:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 01:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030550.l835oxtu000725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-09-03 01:50 EST ------- Done. Updated in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 06:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030616.l836G0HH006719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-09-03 02:15 EST ------- > > 2) base_kernel: > > uname -r would give me something like "2.6.21-1.3194.fc7", while I only need the > > first 3 fields of it: "2.6.21" > > ok, but you don't need the --whatprovides > rpm -q --queryformat='%{VERSION}' kernel-headers should be enough > also buildrequire kernel-headers for this OK > > 6) distro_string: > > I actually only changed it in the tunables-distro-data description. > > The problem is that anyewhere else, the "FC7" string is used instead of f7. So I > > would have to change things upstream. > > But if it is really a problem, please tell me and I'll do the changes, since I > > am the upstream. > > %dist should be fc7 (fedora collection 7) so you should be fine there or did I > miss anything? btw this is only a cosmetic change. OK > The package fails to build here: > SYMLINK include/base -> include/basedbs/base-2.6.22.4 This is because 2.6.22 is not supported. Will add support for it and ping when everything is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 06:26:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] New: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libedit.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/libedit-2.10-1.20070831cvs.fc8.src.rpm Description: Libedit is an autotool- and libtoolized port of the NetBSD Editline library. It provides generic line editing, history, and tokenization functions, similar to those found in GNU Readline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 06:37:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030637.l836bBHv009163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-03 02:37 EST ------- I have been fiddling with PIDA 0.5.1 ever since it was released, but somehow I can not get it to run on my Rawhide system. PIDA 0.4.4, which I had originally submitted, did run on Rawhide with a few tweaks here and there to correctly import the meld modules. Without the tweaks it would simply crash with a traceback. However PIDA 0.5.1 does not get give any such obvious error outputs. It simply gets stuck after the startup splash screen and stays there unless forcibly killed. I have tried the PIDA upstream mailing list, but to no avail. So what is the next step? If someone is interested, then I can give you the PIDA 0.5.1 package and you can give a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 06:55:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 02:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030655.l836tOoV008254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 02:55 EST ------- let me check new release. Can you give new PIDA 0.5.1 SRPM link? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 07:47:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 03:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030747.l837lO4D014511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-03 03:47 EST ------- The reason why guile-gnome-platform's mock is failing at your place is g-wrap hasn't yet been built for rawhide. Please: 1. build g-wrap for rawhide 2. close the bug #250792 3. close this bug as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 08:00:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030800.l8380AZF016453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-03 04:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I was joking, in attempt to make a point. Please keep meaningless patent related > remarks out of supposedly technical forums like bugzilla or fedora-devel. Well, I didn't catch the joke nor the point. I could also very well argue that (possibly confusing) humor doesn't have its place here either. What I meant was that I browsed the source code, the docs, looked at the agreements from the Microsoft docs used, and didn't see any obvious problems. But IANAL, which is why I'd prefer someone with more technical knowledge and/or more legal knowledge to double check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 08:50:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030850.l838ogx5026760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-03 04:50 EST ------- Pong (sorry, got distracted). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 08:54:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030854.l838sNoM023845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 04:54 EST ------- Looks I missed one last thing -> desktop files handling. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 and update SPEC. Not necessary to increase release but add changelog under 3.0.0-4 version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 09:37:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 05:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030937.l839bvdW032658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 09:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 05:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030937.l839blsX029265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-09-03 05:37 EST ------- Done again:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 09:39:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 05:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030939.l839dqWi029345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-03 05:39 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: [nothing] - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - no locales - not relocatable - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Still to check: - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 09:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 05:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030945.l839jOF9030463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ewan at macmahon.me.u | |k) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-03 05:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > OK; some signs of progress, but not quite a solution (yet): > - The name change is clearly your call, but is there any reason to single out > plugins as a special case of add on, or would you want to have a full set of > e.g: > gimp-plugin-XXXX > gimp-brush-XXXX > gimp-pattern-XXXX > I'm not sure there's a way to keep it consistent without having a > proliferation of special cases in the naming guidelines. I'd like to have that. As yours is the first package extending gimp in the repository, your sort of the guinea pig for it ;-). Shall we discuss this on fedora-devel-list? > - The build failure: it does indeed appear to be a 2.4 change, and while I > haven't 100% confirmed, it looks to be the same as this Debian bug > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439469 so it looks like it > might be a problem in Gimp itself. I'm going to test the Debian patch and > if I then get a successful build of resynthesizer I'll file the appropriate > bug on the Gimp. Gimp should have a second RC shortly, we should try with that once it arrives. If it takes too long, I'll shove in a post RC1 SVN snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 09:55:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 05:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709030955.l839tROd031694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 05:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. e8abd1169825efecfccb0f7b4c338bb5 libedit-20070831-2.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libedit.pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + libedit package -> Provides: libedit.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libedit.so.0 libncurses.so.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) +libedit-devel package -> Requires: libedit = 2.10-1.20070831cvs.fc8 libedit.so.0 ncurses-devel pkgconfig + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 11:06:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031106.l83B6oQu010762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 07:06 EST ------- hey you forgot to change %files mock build gave me error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/applications/fedora-stardict.desktop When using syntax to install desktop files from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 desktop file name got renamed to fedora-%{desktopfilename}.desktop Also, I think you should use following syntax for installation of desktop file desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 11:52:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257061] Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031152.l83Bq2EY016128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: osslsigncode - Tool for Authenticode signing of EXE/CAB files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257061 ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2007-09-03 07:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > What I meant was that I browsed the source code, the docs, looked at the > agreements from the Microsoft docs used, and didn't see any obvious problems. > But IANAL, which is why I'd prefer someone with more technical knowledge and/or > more legal knowledge to double check. And what I meant is that this amounts to absolutely nothing and shouldn't even be mentioned. You have a patent system bogged down with tens of thousands software patents (not all belonging to Microsoft) full of obscure legalese that can be applied to anything. To take a "quick look" is just ridiculous. And nobody sane, much less a lawyer, would claim to be sure that certain code is not infringing someone elses patent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 11:49:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275081] New: Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275081 Summary: Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kraxel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenwatch/xenwatch.spec SRPM URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenwatch/xenwatch-0.5.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a bunch of utilities for virtualization hosts. All except xenscreen are using xenstore and thus are xen-specific. xenscreen - attach xen domain consoles to screen windows. xenlog - Log xenstore activity to stdout. xenstore - gtk xenstore browser. xenwatch - list running domains with some properties, allow connecting to text and graphical (vnc) consoles. vnc-client - built-in vnc client from xenwatch as standalone application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 12:51:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031251.l83CpJjQ023610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-03 08:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libedit Short Description: The NetBSD Editline library. Owners: rishi Branches: FC-6, F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 13:02:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225712] Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031302.l83D2suF021522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225712 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 13:13:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225712] Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031313.l83DDDgS022967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dvd+rw-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225712 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-03 09:13 EST ------- Thanks for the quick commit. Looks and (still) works great :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031417.l83EHY4a031652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-03 10:17 EST ------- Please, submit php-channel-phpdb to review and add it as a blocker for this review. There is no Guidelines yet for "channel", we have to work on it. - Please, don't use %{pear_phpdir}/* in %file - keep version in php-pear BR (mainly to avoid EL-4 build) I don't know about License for channel, but you could probably use the same (LGPLv2) than the package provided by this channel or simply "Public domain" (N/A is not a acceptable) I could do a review, but i couldn't sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031423.l83ENbZf004662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-03 10:23 EST ------- - also change name to php-pear-creole (no uppercase in upstream package name) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:31:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031431.l83EV7aj001156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031431.l83EVVrm001205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-03 10:31 EST ------- Source: http://dl.sf.net/sourceforge/py-gnupg/%{pkgname}-%{version}.tar.gz should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/py-gnupg/%{pkgname}-%{version}.tar.gz see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:30:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] New: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-channel-phpdb.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-channel-phpdb-1.0.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package adds the phpdb channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:35:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031435.l83EZbob001996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:35:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] New: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-channel-phing.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-channel-phing-1.0.0-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package adds the phing channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:39:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031439.l83Ed7wH006751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-03 10:39 EST ------- Till, I'll change this when importing the package into CVS as this is a minor spec file change. Further things? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:45:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031445.l83EjDds003396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at linuxnetz.de) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-03 10:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Till, I'll change this when importing the package into CVS as this is a minor > spec file change. Further things? Sure ;-). Bad: - package doesn't compile on devel (x86_64): Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-1.fc8-root-mockbuild error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.pyo RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.py* Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/GnuPGInterface.pyo Error building package from python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm, See build log ending done --> It seems your python_sitelib macro is screwed, change "... print get_python_lib(1) ..." to "... print get_python_lib() ..." Please fix this so I can do the other tests (which kinda require a built package). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 14:55:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031455.l83EtoRt005030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at linuxnetz.de) | ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-03 10:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-GnuPGInterface.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2- 2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:14:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031514.l83FE4WK011914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |275211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:14:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031514.l83FE4qP011890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |256521 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031527.l83FRX2h013853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-03 11:27 EST ------- Thanks Remi for helping me! - add php-channel-phpdb as a blocker: fixed - change license field in the channel: fixed - replace ${pear_phpdir} with ${_datadir}/pear: fixed - keep version in php-pear BR: sorry, what does that mean? - name change to php-pear-creole: fixed New Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-creole.spec New SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-creole-1.1.0-4.fc7.src.rpm What can I do to improve my chances finding a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031526.l83FQcrS013809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 11:26 EST ------- rpmlint on Binary rpm gave me E: libXi zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXi-1.0.4/README E: libXi zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXi-1.0.4/AUTHORS => Remove zero-length files from installing them on system. W: libXi invalid-license MIT/X11 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". =>update license tag. (MIT looks ok but X11 is not recognized) W: libXi obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. W: libXi obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. => add Provides: tag with versions check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:32:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244894] Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031532.l83FWPOD014539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yum-cron - get yum updates via a cron job https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244894 ------- Additional Comments From ahabig at umn.edu 2007-09-03 11:32 EST ------- A warning - if you've installed 0.3-3, please watch for 0.4-1 to appear (just built it and requested a push) and update it manually. Sorry Bill, just as you got the long-awaited package. 0.3-3 had a bug which prevented auto-updating. Which is doubly nasty in this package, since if you're relying on auto-updates to get your updates, then you won't get the fix to the auto-update either. Doh! At least the bad one hadn't made it out of testing yet for F-7. Apologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:33:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226080] Merge Review: libXmu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031533.l83FX1PD014636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXmu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226080 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 11:33 EST ------- rpmlint on Binary rpm gave me E: libXmu zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXmu-1.0.3/AUTHORS => Remove zero-length files from installing them on system. W: libXmu invalid-license MIT/X11 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". =>update license tag. (MIT looks ok but X11 is not recognized or this warning can be ignored then) W: libXmu obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. W: libXmu obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. => add Provides: tag with versions check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226077] Merge Review: libxkbfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031533.l83FX8T6009984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226077 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 11:33 EST ------- rpmlint on Binary rpm gave me E: libxkbfile zero-length /usr/share/doc/libxkbfile-1.0.4/AUTHORS E: libxkbfile zero-length /usr/share/doc/libxkbfile-1.0.4/INSTALL E: libxkbfile zero-length /usr/share/doc/libxkbfile-1.0.4/README => Remove zero-length files from installing them on system. W: libxkbfile invalid-license MIT/X11 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". =>update license tag. (MIT looks ok but X11 is not recognized or this warning can be ignored then) W: libxkbfile obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. W: libxkbfile obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. => add Provides: tag with versions check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:38:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] New: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage-0.2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage.spec Description: Gimmage is a simple GNOME image viewer that aims to have a minimalist interface and tries to be keyboard operable for browsing through a large number of images quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:47:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031547.l83Fl5Ql016644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-03 11:47 EST ------- $ LANG=C wget http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-2.src.rpm --17:46:20-- http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-2.src.rpm => `python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-2.src.rpm' Resolving labs.linuxnetz.de... 62.216.180.2, 2001:1a50:6::1 Connecting to labs.linuxnetz.de|62.216.180.2|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Internal Server Error 17:46:20 ERROR 500: Internal Server Error. The spec is still release 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226074] Merge Review: libXft In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031544.l83Fi8Qf016048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226074 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 11:44 EST ------- rpmlint on Binary rpm gave me E: libXft zero-length /usr/share/doc/libXft-2.1.12/NEWS => Remove zero-length files from installing them on system. W: libXft invalid-license MIT/X11 The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "AFL", "Affero GPL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic clarified", "Boost", "BSD with advertising", "BSD", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Cryptix", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "GPL+", "GPLv2", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "Jabber", "LaTeX", "LGPL+", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "LPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SMLNJL", "SISSL", "SPL", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "SIL Open Font", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". =>update license tag as MIT only. (MIT looks ok but X11 is not recognized) W: libXft obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. W: libXft obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. => add Provides: tag with versions check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 15:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031550.l83Fo5kJ012489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-03 11:50 EST ------- Rawhide ate my baby. Once more these days. I'm already digging into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031607.l83G7lVs019361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-03 12:07 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-phing.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-phing-2.3.0-0.6.beta1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031616.l83GG0Gr020578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |275231 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031615.l83GFxga020554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |266941 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:17:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031617.l83GHCX7020771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |266801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:17:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031617.l83GHC68020747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |266841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031617.l83GHYnm016126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |266821 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:17:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031617.l83GHYkE016102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |266841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031623.l83GNenS021684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |266801, 266821 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031623.l83GNeOU021708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |275211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031623.l83GNfn5021735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |275211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:21:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031621.l83GLHhq021525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-03 12:21 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-propel_runtime.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-propel_runtime-1.2.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:22:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031622.l83GMMUS016872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-03 12:22 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-propel.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-propel-1.2.1-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031619.l83GJ11R016220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-03 12:19 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-propel_generator.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-propel_generator-1.2.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 16:44:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031644.l83Gi18s024668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-09-03 12:44 EST ------- OK, the build works fine, and the error message, I will get when no channel.conf exist is the same as in kubuntu. So I will APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 17:13:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 13:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031713.l83HDABA028610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-03 13:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: klear Short Description: DVB TV application and harddisk-recorder for linux Owners: johan at x-tnd.be Branches: F-7 InitialCC: johan at x-tnd.be Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 17:17:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 13:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031717.l83HHqXG024823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: filezilla - |Review Request: filezilla - |FileZilla is a fast FTP and |FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP |SFTP client |client ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-03 13:17 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla-3.0.0-0.3.rc3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla.spec Description: FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client Spec changelog - Update to 3.0.0rc3 - Add BR gawk - Improve description/summary - Removed dual listed doc file (also fixed the rpmlint warning on src.rpm ) About the encoding line, this seems deprecated with Fedora 8. Upstream say so also Built on rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=145790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:18:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031818.l83IIjsZ004713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031821.l83ILvqa005342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:24:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031824.l83IOaIa001053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031826.l83IQ4ug001565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031832.l83IWg7H002293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:32 EST ------- I assume you are just taking over the orphaned libedit package? I've marked you as owner of that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:38:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235825] Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031838.l83Ic5mm007421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kftpgrabber - Graphical FTP client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235825 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197967] Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031840.l83IedYu007908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm - Multiple stacked system monitors in one process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197967 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 18:43:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 14:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031843.l83IhsD8003734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-03 14:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 19:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275491] New: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275491 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type- safe access to PostgreSQL databases Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pgocaml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pgocaml-0.9-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: PG'OCaml is a type-safe, simple interface to PostgreSQL from OCaml. It lets you embed SQL statements directly into OCaml code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 19:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251824] Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031927.l83JRHg3009454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive - 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251824 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-03 15:27 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 19:35:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251825] Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709031935.l83JZ0ea014481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maniadrive-data - Data files for maniadrive, a 3D stunt driving game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251825 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-03 15:34 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 21:59:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 17:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234355] Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709032159.l83Lx7MS000348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: klear - graphical TV viewer with an integrated recording system for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234355 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 22:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247200] Review Request: wulfware - A LAN/cluster/beowulf monitoring toolset In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709032209.l83M98tB030022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wulfware - A LAN/cluster/beowulf monitoring toolset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247200 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-09-03 18:09 EST ------- I am using the spec file in the srpm at http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Beowulf/wulfware/wulfware-2.5.1-0.src.rpm Build fails in mock: + ./autogen.sh ./autogen.sh: line 8: autoheader: command not found ./autogen.sh: line 9: aclocal: command not found ./autogen.sh: line 12: automake: command not found ./autogen.sh: line 13: autoconf: command not found You will need to BuildRequires these rpmlint -i on the srpm, (edited with my comments): E: wulfware no-description-tag There is no %description tag in your spec file. To insert it, just insert a '%description' tag in your spec file, add a textual description of the package after it, and rebuild the package. W: wulfware invalid-license Open Source The value of the License tag was not recognized. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing for how to specify GPL versions W: wulfware hardcoded-packager-tag rgb at phy.duke.edu The Packager tag is hardcoded in your spec file. It should be removed, so as to use rebuilder's own defaults. W: wulfware unversioned-explicit-provides libwulf.so The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. (Actually drop this provides entirely, rpm figures these provides out) W: wulfware rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./configure --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. E: wulfware configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}. (You probably want the %configure macro) E: wulfware hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: wulfware hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libwulf.so A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. E: wulfware hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libwulf.so.%{version} A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. You also need to use macros for bindir, mandir etc. instead of /usr/share /usr/bin etc. The Source needs to be a URL, or have a comment on how to generate it Don't define version or release macros, the tags to it for you. What is the purpose of %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 ? Why is there symlinking done in post and postun scripts? %install would be a better place. Be sure this uses macros as described earlier. For your Fedora Core comment, drop the Core, Core is merged for Fedora 7+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 22:36:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709032236.l83MaY3h001280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-03 18:36 EST ------- $ curl -I http://www.ralinktech.com.tw/ralink/data/RT61_Firmware_V1.2.zip HTTP/1.1 404 Object Not Found The zip has vanished. Do you know the new location? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 22:39:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709032239.l83MdKJS005550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-03 18:39 EST ------- it is: (the ralink directory was removed) http://www.ralinktech.com.tw/data/RT61_Firmware_V1.2.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 3 22:54:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709032254.l83MsKvE007499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-03 18:54 EST ------- Well yes! I need to update the new path then! thx for have noticed that! But unfortunatily we cannot have somewhere to download the Ralin's license file... Usually, we need to have the license from within the firmware archive or at least from a public place (website). I will ask again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 00:21:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040021.l840LulM015567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-03 20:21 EST ------- Since it is taking a bit longer for the upstream release than expected let's go ahead with just removing the questionable themes from the tarball as per . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 02:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040241.l842fO5Y006287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-09-03 22:41 EST ------- Apparently, cvs commit eludes me at times :) Committed now; holding off on bumping release and building until we make sure everything is set -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 02:49:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040249.l842nFbV007384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 ------- Additional Comments From zhu at redhat.com 2007-09-03 22:49 EST ------- Sorry, It is fixed now. Is it OK now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 03:43:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 23:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040343.l843h97r012299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 23:43 EST ------- looks ok but I do have some questions 1) why not to use fedora as vendor id? 2) didn't get the need to use __doc directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 04:10:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040410.l844AJ0X019580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-09-04 00:10 EST ------- Hopefully this is the last one I have to do... I fixed all the requires and BuildRequires. No longer requiring -devels, and no longer is there an explicit dependency on python 2.5.... The .desktop file has long since been updated by upstream.... Spec URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/SPECS/oggconvert.spec RPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/noarch/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-10.fc7.noarch.rpm md5sum: 9fc9ab1ea7243829f2d973d8e54ed329 sha1sum: cff1e8a191ef5714aa04ce73d67fcd64b5e199c5 SRPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/SRPMS/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-10.fc7.src.rpm md5sum: c0ddea445e121a7dc2a2e23ccd6f8f8d sha1sum: 30f5f5cd78196314091b60eb1090515afa4ee603 This rpm are digitally signed and the GPG key is available, the instructions for my GPG key are at rpm.rgw-net.com (my first name is Neal) mock should build fine for this, aside from my GPG key if it isn't imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 04:16:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040416.l844GxVc017039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 00:16 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. - rpmlint is not silent on RPM W: stardict non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/stardict.schemas but this can be ignored. + source files match upstream. 23bbfd0a75baab5d0def5596f19b80cb stardict-3.0.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file handled correctly. + scrollkeeper scriptlet used. + Binary RPM stardict-3.0.0-4.fc8 -> Provides: advertisement.so stardict_espeak.so stardict_gucharmap.so stardict_html_parsedata.so stardict_man.so stardict_powerword_parsedata.so stardict_spell.so stardict_update_info.so stardict_wiki_parsedata.so stardict_xdxf_parsedata.so Requires: bonobo-activation >= 2.2.0 enchant espeak gucharmap libICE.so.6 libORBit-2.so.0 libSM.so.6 libX11.so.6 libart_lgpl_2.so.2 libatk-1.0.so.0 libbonobo >= 2.2.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libbonoboui-2.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libenchant.so.1 libespeak.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgconf-2.so.4 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgnome >= 2.2.0 libgnome-2.so.0 libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 libgnomeui >= 2.2.0 libgnomeui-2.so.0 libgnomevfs-2.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgucharmap.so.6 libm.so.6 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpopt.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libsigc++20 >= 2.0.17 libsigc-2.0.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 06:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 02:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040639.l846dCZJ003379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-09-04 02:39 EST ------- Package updated with version: 0.18-7 Spec URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-7/nabi.spec SRPM URL: http://oriya.sourceforge.net/0.18-7/nabi-0.18-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 07:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 03:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040736.l847aoLW011309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-09-04 03:36 EST ------- Here are the new links: SPEC URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.13-1/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bullopensource.org/libtune/libtune-0.13-1/libtune-0.13-1.fc7.src.rpm Coming back to the remark you did about the distro_string variable in comment #32: > use %{dist} for distro_string Actually, I used fc%{fedora} instead, since %dist} begins with a dot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 08:58:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 04:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] New: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/libzzub-0.2.3-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: If you are searching for a foundation for your next Soundtracker, libzzub is what you want. libzzub provides an extensible DSP plugin system, a wavetable, instruments, a multitrack sequencer and support for major soundcard APIs. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. I've checked that mp3 support (with libmad) is not compiled into the resulting binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040906.l8496KrS023911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 05:06 EST ------- any reason for not using vendor_id as fedora? from following link, you can see it suggests to use fedora as vendor_id. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:21:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] New: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: These are the Python bindings For libzzub, allowing you to use it from within Python scripts. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. This package is needed to make libzzub work with aldrin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:19:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040919.l849JlKL025377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040922.l849MZDQ025962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |275851 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040922.l849MYBw025938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |275831 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040919.l849JbNF025317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-04 05:19 EST ------- Actually "vendor_id" in Fedora guidelines is only used when upstream do not already have it... If upstream have it, then it must conform to rule about not using a different name. But this vendor field, while mandatory with older desktop-file-install version, is also exposed to be deprecated... There was a recent discution about that on the Fedora-devel mail-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01841.html About __doc, I use it because docs get often installed in the wrong place... But when they are in the right place, the problem still appear because the %doc macro take his path to begin from %{_builddir} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. So this tweak make the %doc macros usuable on installed docs... For now this tweak is used for only two files, but i expect it must be checked when final will be released. Maybe the doc content will be larger then... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:25:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040925.l849P18p029580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |275871 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709040925.l849P06O029468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |275851 OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 09:24:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 05:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] New: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/aldrin.spec SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/aldrin-0.11-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Aldrin is a powerful music composition software featuring a flexible audio routing system commonly found in expensive audio software, enabling you to mix, split, mutilate and modify audio signals emitted by software synthesizers and samples. -- I'm still searching for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 10:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041007.l84A7MgV031952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-04 06:07 EST ------- I've always been following Red Dieter's idea of only adding a fedora vendor if upstream doesn't provide a dekstop file at all, but I didn't realize this didn't make it into the guidelines. Fixed. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage-0.2.3-2.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 10:44:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041044.l84AiPR5007344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 10:48:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041048.l84AmxM1008080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 06:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I've always been following Red Dieter's idea of only adding a fedora vendor if > upstream doesn't provide a dekstop file at all, but I didn't realize this didn't > make it into the guidelines. Fixed. > > Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage-0.2.3-2.fc8.src.rpm > SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage.spec > thanks. But meanwhile I got some more information on desktop-files check https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01841.html and https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01857.html now I as per current guidelines new updated SPEC looks correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 10:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041049.l84AnhPT008119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 06:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Actually "vendor_id" in Fedora guidelines is only used when upstream do not > already have it... If upstream have it, then it must conform to rule about not > using a different name. But this vendor field, while mandatory with older > desktop-file-install version, is also exposed to be deprecated... > > There was a recent discution about that on the Fedora-devel mail-list: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01841.html > > But from https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01857.html it said use current guidelines. > About __doc, I use it because docs get often installed in the wrong place... But > when they are in the right place, the problem still appear because the %doc > macro take his path to begin from %{_builddir} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. So > this tweak make the %doc macros usuable on installed docs... > > For now this tweak is used for only two files, but i expect it must be checked > when final will be released. Maybe the doc content will be larger then... > > OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 11:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 07:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041110.l84BADfa007440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-04 07:10 EST ------- There remain some problem: * in spec there is mmissing %{?_smp_mflags} flag.. is there any reason for this? * rpmlint output on *.rpm is not empty E: groff non-executable-script /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/groffer/version.sh 0644 E: groff non-executable-script /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devps/generate/symbol.sed 0644 E: groff zero-length /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/tmac/mm/locale E: groff non-executable-script /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devdvi/generate/CompileFonts 0644 E: groff zero-length /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/tmac/mm/se_locale E: groff non-executable-script /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/font/devps/generate/afmname 0644 W: groff invalid-license GPL W: groff-debuginfo invalid-license GPL W: groff-gxditview no-documentation W: groff-gxditview invalid-license GPL W: groff-perl invalid-license GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 11:17:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 07:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041117.l84BHAKR009462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 07:17 EST ------- But mock build showed me that now same desktop files got installed twice. Basically using vendor_id as fedora when upstream installs desktop file using make file correctly you need to pass additional parameter --delete-original so change desktop-file-install command look like as desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 11:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 07:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041142.l84BghCe013055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-04 07:42 EST ------- Makes sense, missed it in the build log. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage-0.2.3-3.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gimmage.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 12:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041228.l84CShsc020722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 08:28 EST ------- Okay. Now I saw that you rebuilt HippoDraw on devel, F-7 and FC-6. Then please request this package to push on F-7 repository using bodhi system: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT Now closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 12:46:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225631] Merge Review: busybox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041246.l84Ckq5R023492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: busybox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225631 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-04 08:46 EST ------- Thanks for your comments. Fixed in busybox-1.6.1-2.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041419.l84EJBAh005850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-04 10:19 EST ------- Thanks for your comments, fixed in gd-2.0.34-3.fc8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:27:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041427.l84ERYiH007389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-04 10:27 EST ------- Even with no initscripts for -dedicated, or should I add them later? I suppose it is usable without them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226113] Merge Review: lynx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041427.l84ERTMO007351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lynx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226113 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-04 10:27 EST ------- The approval was granted so I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:35:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041435.l84EZLOH008762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-04 10:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: armcycles-ad Short Description: A lightcycle game in 3D Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:36:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] New: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mszpak at wp.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5-1.3d-2.src.rpm Description: Allows to check what takes the most of your hard disk space and track its changes. It's a very small program (in fact a script), but was very useful for me, so I decided to make a package for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:36:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041436.l84Ea1Wv006914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-04 10:36 EST ------- Whoops, bad package name, corrected: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: armacycles-ad Short Description: A lightcycle game in 3D Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:45:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041445.l84EjdNo008900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 10:45 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. f51cca53b3d33415e75a91cf81b6ac39 gimmage-0.2.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + Desktop files installed correctly. + file permissions are appropriate. + update-desktop-database scriptlets used. + Package gimmage-0.2.3-3.fc8 -> Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libatkmm-1.6.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libcairomm-1.0.so.1 libcurl.so.4 libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgdkmm-2.4.so.1 libglib-2.0.so.0 libglibmm-2.4.so.1 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgtkmm-2.4.so.1 libm.so.6 libmagic.so.1 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangomm-1.4.so.1 libsigc-2.0.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 14:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041450.l84EolJj011252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-09-04 10:50 EST ------- Ehh, those links weren't to the newest version of a package. Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5-1.3d-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 15:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 11:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041510.l84FAUBs013113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Gimp should have a second RC shortly, we should try with that once it arrives. > If it takes too long, I'll shove in a post RC1 SVN snapshot. Gimp 2.4.0 rc2 (gimp-2.4.0-0.rc2.1.fc8) seems good to this package. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=147134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 15:33:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 11:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041533.l84FXTQk018606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 11:33 EST ------- I cannot see your spec/srpm ===================================================== Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request GET /dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec. Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Connection refused Apache/1.3.34 Server at prelive.iconmobile.com Port 81 ===================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 15:42:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 11:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041542.l84FgrSN018598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-04 11:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: blktrace Short Description: block IO tracer Owners: sandeen Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 15:45:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 11:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041545.l84FjGIq019262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-09-04 11:45 EST ------- Ehh, a package has been waiting for 4 months and in the meantime an author sneakily released a new version ;) Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5-1.4.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 16:04:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041604.l84G435L022435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-04 12:04 EST ------- Sorry, I was just migrating my workstation. The repository will soon move to a real server. Access is available again now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 16:45:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225899] Merge Review: indent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041645.l84GjHiQ032750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: indent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225899 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-04 12:45 EST ------- I'll look into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 17:08:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041708.l84H8obq000883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 17:15:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041715.l84HFh9s004715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-04 13:15 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/pyzzub.spec Updated SRPM Url: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/pyzzub-0.8-2.fc7.src.rpm Building on x86_64 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 17:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041730.l84HUZTV004353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-04 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Even with no initscripts for -dedicated, or should I add them later? I suppose > it is usable without them. Yes, I was thinking that we actually already have quite a few game servers without initscripts, and that making fixing that a must is a bit harsh. Still something worth doing though, but you might want to wait till the final form of initscripts for F-8 is clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041813.l84IDcRB010573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:52:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041852.l84IqEmn019587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 14:52 EST ------- For 0.5.0-2: * License - Well, actually this is "GPLv2+" (GPL version 2 and any later) because * The source does not mention any version (even "version 2"). In this case The following sentence (in GPL text) is applied. ------------------------------------------------------------- If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. ------------------------------------------------------------- * Requires - This package actually requires ghostscript and this package should have "Requires: ghostscript". * Before being sponsored: ============================================================= NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) ============================================================== - Well, it seems that you pre-reviewed bug 253781, however I must say that your way of writing (pre-)review makes it difficult for reporter, other reviewers etc.. to check your comment easily. Would you once summarize what the reporter must fix on bug 253781? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:51:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041851.l84IpNaZ016727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-04 14:51 EST ------- closing bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:57:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041857.l84IvYKB017827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-04 14:57 EST ------- I'm taking this review. Can you update the spec in accordance to fedora packaging guidelines ? a quick look : #001 upstream naming convention fedora kde sig hasn't yet formalized the us of kde-style-XXX thus you can drop : -n domino-%{version} from %setup #002 correct License tag #003: >= 3.0.0 be removed from BuildRequires: As FC6 already has a KDE > 3. #004: remove qt-devel from the BuildRequires: As kdelibs-devel already requires qt-devel rpm -qR kdelibs-devel [..] qt-devel [..] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:02:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041902.l84J20Qa018686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-04 15:02 EST ------- Please use your FAS name for Owner fields for any further requests. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041901.l84J1SHr018597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 15:01 EST ------- Any response from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:04:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041904.l84J41nu021529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-04 15:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254209] Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041922.l84JMISx024543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-04 15:22 EST ------- Okay, tag dist-F8 has been unblocked. now, g-wrap has been imported and built (on working branch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:22:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041922.l84JMKhx024587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 Bug 254211 depends on bug 254209, which changed state. Bug 254209 Summary: Review Request: g-wrap - A tool for creating Scheme interfaces to C libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254209 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041930.l84JUf2Y023641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-04 15:30 EST ------- Note that due to this text: If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. Even GPLv1 is OK, and the License: tag should be "GPL+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 19:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 15:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041944.l84JiIvk028288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 15:44 EST ------- Some random comments for 0.5.4.2-1: * %changelog place - Please write %changelog at the last of the spec file. %changelog will get longer and longer in the future and writing %changelog in the middle of the spec file makes it difficult to check the spec file easily. * Unneeded macro - Fedora surely has gnutls-devel, tcl-devel and _without_ssl macro or so are redundant. * Parallel make - Support parallel make when possible (check the section "Parallel make" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) ! From build.log: (available from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=147235 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_147235/ ) * Possibly missing BuildRequires: ------------------------------------------------------ checking for libotr LIBS... -lotr checking for libotr headers version 3.x >= 3.0.0... not present. checking for otrl_message_receiving in -lotr... no ------------------------------------------------------ - Perhaps libotr-devel is missing from BuildRequires. * compilation flags ------------------------------------------------------ make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/micq-0.5.4.2/src' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/micq"' -I../include -O4 -Wall -c -o autopackage_prefix.o autopackage_prefix.c ------------------------------------------------------- - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored (please check: "Compiler flags" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) ! Note that %configure sets CFLAGS as environment. Please check what %configure actually does by "rpm --eval %configure". - (On Fedora) compilation flag "-O4" is forbidden. This makes debugging difficult. * Lang specific files -------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_mandir}/*/man?/* -------------------------------------------------------- - Language specific files should be mark properly as %lang(foo), e.g. -------------------------------------------------------- %lang(de) %{_mandir}/de/man?/* -------------------------------------------------------- * Non-utf8 files -------------------------------------------------------- micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/uk/man7/micq.7.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru/man7/micq.7.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/sk/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/sk/man5/micqrc.5.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/sk/man7/micq.7.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/it/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/uk/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/ru/man5/micqrc.5.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man5/micqrc.5.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man7/micq.7.gz ---------------------------------------------------------- - These files are not encoded with UTF-8. Please change the encoding to UTF-8. * Questionable permission ----------------------------------------------------------- micq.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/micq-0.5.4.2/example-micq-event-script ----------------------------------------------------------- - Usually documents should not have executable permission. * EVR in the changelog - Please add EVR (Epoch:Version:Releae) infomation in the %changelog. For example: ----------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Aug 26 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 0.5.4.2-1 - rpmlint cleanups ----------------------------------------------------------- Note: please increment release number (when version does not change) each time you modify your spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 20:51:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042051.l84KpVs6007604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-09-04 16:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #80) > Okay. Now I saw that you rebuilt HippoDraw on devel, F-7 and FC-6. > Then please request this package to push on F-7 repository using > bodhi system: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ > according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > > Now closing as NEXTRELEASE. I'm uncertain of this next step. Should I make a request for "new update" of type "bug fix" with bug number being his one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041844.l84IijSY018361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora-review? |? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709041822.l84IMO5l012009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 14:22 EST ------- Well, this time: ================================================================== Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request GET /dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec. Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: No route to host Apache/1.3.34 Server at prelive.iconmobile.com Port 81 =================================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 18:35:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] New: Review Request: - < Desktop news aggregator> Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 Summary: Review Request: - < Desktop news aggregator> Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: 440volt.tux at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 21:42:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042142.l84LgeiT011316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-04 17:42 EST ------- Built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 21:51:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 17:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042151.l84Lp2xK015623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-04 17:51 EST ------- Built - Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042202.l84M23cC017199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-04 18:02 EST ------- obexfs-0.11-0.1.rc2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:08:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042208.l84M8l7K015074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-04 18:08 EST ------- b43-fwcutter-008-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:08:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254088] Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042208.l84M8mth015103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-fwcutter - firmware cutter which outputs new format used by b43 drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254088 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |008-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:11:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042211.l84MBrNl019009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-04 18:11 EST ------- audio-convert-mod-3.45.1-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042211.l84MBAHb018970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-04 18:11 EST ------- not any answear for now. I will send it again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:11:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042211.l84MBt8G019038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |3.45.1-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:35:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250893] Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042235.l84MZsoU019489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audio-convert-mod - A simple audio file converter supporting many formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250893 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 4 22:59:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709042259.l84MxNrd025427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-04 18:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gimmage Short Description: A Simple GNOME Image Viewer Owners: denis Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 01:57:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 21:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050157.l851vd44011274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-04 21:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #81) > I'm uncertain of this next step. Should I make a request for "new update" > of type "bug fix" with bug number being his one? Well, "new update" of type "enhancement" with bug number this one. Then after pushing "submit", select "push to stable". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 02:28:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050228.l852SiTM015970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-09-04 22:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > This bug looks like it is ASSIGNED but to "nobody". Shouldn't it be ASSIGNED to > the package reviewer? (Likewise for bug #242416). Or otherwise switched back to NEW? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 02:26:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050226.l852Qs7v015831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-09-04 22:26 EST ------- This bug looks like it it is being reviewed by Patrice (or is this an "unofficial review"?), but is currently not ASSIGNED to anybody. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 02:25:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050225.l852PLTl015679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2007-09-04 22:25 EST ------- This bug looks like it is ASSIGNED but to "nobody". Shouldn't it be ASSIGNED to the package reviewer? (Likewise for bug #242416). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 02:42:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 22:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050242.l852ga8J021566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-04 22:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 03:39:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 23:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050339.l853dgZj030211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-04 23:39 EST ------- Nobody has signed on to review this package, hence its state. Patrice is offering comments; you are free to do so as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 03:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 23:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050341.l853fEBR026929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-04 23:41 EST ------- You can't easily switch tickets back to NEW. (It sometimes suffices to close the ticket, then reopen it, then clear the "reopened" keyboard, but it is certainly not worth the trouble.) The current state of this ticket is just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 03:52:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 23:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050352.l853q1RG031852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 23:52 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. bf360b92eba9e6d5610196ce2e02fcd1 squashfs3.2-r2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. - dist tag is Not present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package squashfs-tools-3.2-1 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 04:15:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 00:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050415.l854FEvw031049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-09-05 00:15 EST ------- It's come to my intention (from other folks, as well as taking a look at it again after writing it) that the above is difficult to read. Here's a condensed version: License: ======== COPYING says GPLv2, source files says GPLv2 or later. AFAIK, what the source says shows the actual "intent" of the author for licensing. As such, license should be GPLv2+. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-4d5634799c488896bc50697288213a0b2d9acbae Source & md5sums: ================= Version in src.rpm is 30ca7ba6d3b8e632f4ec611a565fb445, upstream is 3ee9e7890392acd53cd5487f33f84f48 (this may be fixed by newer package, but obviously I can't tell) Does package build? =================== In my original post I have the error message. The reason behind this error is that you need a "BuildRequires: python-devel". This can replace the BR: python, since python-devel will automatically require python. Macros: ======= $RPM_BUILD_ROOT could be %{buildroot} .desktop file: ============== See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-43fa82f212954e9288ab00a4f250403353c1813d , basically, you're missing the desktop-file-install command Release number vs. Version number: ================================== You incremented the minor version number in your new .spec... whereas you want to leave that number alone (since it corresponds to upstream source) and instead increment the Release: number, which corresponds to the package version. Don't forget to update the package's %changelog! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 07:12:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050712.l857C83Z023530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-05 03:12 EST ------- Here is the source diff output for the record: $ diff -ur nabi-0.18 nabi-0.18_fedora Only in nabi-0.18/themes: MSWindows Only in nabi-0.18/themes: MSWindowsXP Only in nabi-0.18/themes: Mac All issues have been addressed and the package looks good to me. Thanks Subhransu for your patience and work on this. I am happy to approve the package. :) BTW note if you want to build the package for F7 then it will have to be with the older release since f7 libhangul is still 0.0.4 which is not new enough to build the latest nabi. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 07:42:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050742.l857gbEp028338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-05 03:42 EST ------- It would help if you could do one so-called package "pre-review" and I am happy to sponsor you for cvsextras. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 07:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050743.l857hRqw024532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 07:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277931] New: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277931 Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-looks - Java look&feel Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-looks-2.1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The JGoodies look&feels make your Swing applications and applets look better. They have been optimized for readability, precise micro-design and usability. Main Benefits: * Improved readability, legibility and in turn usability. * Improved aesthetics - looks good on the majority of desktops * Simplified multi-platform support * Precise micro-design -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 07:44:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 277921] New: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277921 Summary: Review Request: jgoodies-forms - Java layout framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-forms.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/jgoodies/jgoodies-forms-1.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The JGoodies Forms framework helps you lay out and implement elegant Swing panels quickly and consistently. It makes simple things easy and the hard stuff possible, the good design easy and the bad difficult. Main Benefits: * Powerful, flexible and precise layout * Easy to work with and quite easy to learn * Faster UI production * Better UI code readability * Leads to better style guide compliance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 07:49:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050749.l857nYB3025489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-05 03:49 EST ------- ok, its built successfully on devel_%{arch} now (In reply to comment #7) > OK; some signs of progress, but not quite a solution (yet): > - The name change is clearly your call, but is there any reason to single out > plugins as a special case of add on, or would you want to have a full set of > e.g: > gimp-plugin-XXXX > gimp-brush-XXXX > gimp-pattern-XXXX gimp-plugin-XXXX should be more apropirate. > I'm not sure there's a way to keep it consistent without having a > proliferation of special cases in the naming guidelines. i'm not really sure that there's something to be worried about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 08:23:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 04:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050823.l858NIA3032161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: TzClock - |Review Request: TzClock - |GTK+ Time Zone Clock |GTK+ Time Zone Clock ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-05 04:23 EST ------- A few comment: - How about a desktop file? - Would be nice to use %configure and %{_bindir}. - changelog entry would be nice too - you should not use the Packager field in fedora packages: your name will be in the changelog - url to source tarball should be used - I would replace "X" by "Cairo" say in the Summary. You probably want to run rpmlint on the srpm and rpm to check for more things. Very cool clock! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 09:40:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 05:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050940.l859ep25013496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-05 05:40 EST ------- Okay, All issues has been fixed. This package can be apporved now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 09:47:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 05:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709050947.l859l6X9018585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-05 05:47 EST ------- ping Richard ? Any news about this issue ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 10:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 06:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051030.l85AUFoO025742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-09-05 06:30 EST ------- The news is that I really must get around to fixing this package :-) Debian have fixed it, so I'll just copy their fix. http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/debian-ocaml-status.html I've got a bunch of real easy reviews waiting! Bug 253564 Bug 253570 Bug 253571 Bug 275491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 11:03:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051103.l85B3uCG027297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mtx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 rbrich at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 11:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051102.l85B24He027143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mtx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2007-09-05 07:02 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mtx Updated Fedora Owners: rbrich at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 11:02:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051102.l85B2qZe027205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mt-st https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2007-09-05 07:02 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mt-st Updated Fedora Owners: rbrich at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 11:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051104.l85B4C9W031438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mt-st https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 rbrich at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 11:14:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051114.l85BEZeR029010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mt-st https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-05 07:14 EST ------- Agreed with ownership transition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 11:32:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051132.l85BWde2032206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(joshuadfranklin at ya | |hoo.com) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-05 07:32 EST ------- Joshua, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:05:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051205.l85C5QB5005614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-05 08:05 EST ------- I think all problems have been solved. Permissions for example-micq-event-script have been not changed, because it is not a real usable script, only an example. An user need to copy this script and update it and then he can fix permissions for its copy. Changelog: * Wed Sep 05 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 0.5.4.2-2 - changelog section moved to end of spec file - compilation condition removed - paralel compilation support added - libotr-devel added to BuildRequires to build package on f8 too - compilation flags updated (-O4 removed) - man files converted to UTF-8 - added lang macros for man pages - EVR added to changelog entries New SRPM: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/micq-0.5.4.2-2.fc7.src.rpm Spec file location has been not changed (only content updated). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:23:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051223.l85CNwVw008493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 08:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Even GPLv1 is OK, and the License: tag should be "GPL+". Thanks, Jason. So would you update your srpm/spec, Nicholas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:37:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051237.l85Cb2FO015102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 08:37 EST ------- (Sorry, once unassigning...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051235.l85CZSUJ014811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:37:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051237.l85Cbm9g011184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:35:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051235.l85CZHht010948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-05 08:35 EST ------- I'll post some comments shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 12:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051252.l85Cq4pX017820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: squashfs-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-09-05 08:52 EST ------- Thanks, building now with the changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:10:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051310.l85DA8g6021036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mt-st https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 rbrich at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2007-09-05 09:10 EST ------- canceling request, it's now ok (via pkgdb) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:09:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226166] Merge Review: mtx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051309.l85D9nHv016622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mtx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226166 rbrich at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2007-09-05 09:09 EST ------- canceling request, it's now ok (via pkgdb) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:21:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051321.l85DL2pv018831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-05 09:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Pixie Short Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant Owners: kwizart Branches: devel FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:28:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051328.l85DSuGI023559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-05 09:28 EST ------- The package looks ok, there are just few easy to fix issues. - rpmlint is silent - the package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - the spec file name matches the base package %{name} X the package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - please add %{?_smp_mflags} to the make command - the line before %configure doesn't seem to be necessary. If it is, please add a comment. Also would be nice to have a comment for the relro linker flag - the package has a test suite, please enable it in %check or add a comment if there is a reason why it's disabled - the package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) - the License field in the package spec file matches the actual license - the file containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc - the spec file is written in American English - the spec file for the package is legible X source URL isn't specified in this package - upstream doesn't seem to provide tarball for 0.5, please add a comment to spec how to generate the tarball. Also, the tarball name probably should contain the svn string. If it's a prerelease for 0.5, the release tag for the package should start with 0. We don't want to bump epoch to fix this, so it's better to keep it as it is. - all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires - the package owns all directories that it creates - the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing - permissions on files are set properly - the package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT X the package must consistently use macros - in %files section should be %{_bindir}/ltrace, without %{_prefix} - %{_sysconfdir}/ltrace.conf instead of /etc/ - the package contains code, or permissible content - files included as %doc don't affect the runtime of the application - the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages - at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 - the package builds in mock - the package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures - the package functions as described -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:49:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051349.l85Dn0oe023265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2007-09-05 09:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=187421) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=187421&action=view) build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:48:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051348.l85DmVsq023176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 tjb at unh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjb at unh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2007-09-05 09:48 EST ------- This doesn't compile for me. Something about translations. Buildlog included next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051350.l85Do6Zx027367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 09:50 EST ------- Some random comments for 0.2.3-2 (from very quick check:) (For people who also want to check this spec/srpm, I put them given from Alexander by mail on: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/libzzub/ ) # For spec file: A. Description stage: * SourceURL - For sourceforge source, please refer to the section "Sourceforge.net" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Redundant Requires: ------------------------------------------------- Requires: zlib Requires: jack-audio-connection-kit Requires: alsa-lib ------------------------------------------------- - All these Requires are redundant (and should be removed) because rpmbuild checks the dependencies for libraries automatically and the dependencies should pull these Requires. ? python dependency ------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: python >= 2.5 Requires: python >= 2.5 ------------------------------------------------- - Would you explain why should this package have these dependencies (especially Requires)? B. %prep/%build/%install stage * Macros - Please use macros. For example, /usr -> %_prefix * Debuginfo rpm issue: -------------------------------------------------- find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT \ -type f \ -perm /a+x \ -exec strip '{}' \; -------------------------------------------------- - Stripping binaries is strictly forbidden. * This disables to create debuginfo rpm. * Note that creating debuginfo automatically strips binaries. C. %files section * Directory ownership issue --------------------------------------------------- %{_libdir}/lunar/fx/*/*.so --------------------------------------------------- - Please ensure that all directories this package will create are owned by this package. Currently %_libdir/lunar and all directories under %_libdir/lunar are not owned by any package. D. rpmlint ---------------------------------------------------- W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libzzub-0.2.3/CREDITS.txt ---------------------------------------------------- * Change the encoding to UTF-8. ---------------------------------------------------- libzzub.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 53, tab: line 1) ---------------------------------------------------- * The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. E. arch * This package does not be rebuilt on ppc64. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=148578 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:57:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051357.l85DvtZx028353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-05 09:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Not a full review, but some comments from looking over the spec file: > > * For your URL tag, Is there a specific reason for choosing the ftp.acc.umu.se > mirror rather than the round-robin ftp.gnome.org hostname? Fixed > * Your Source0 tag should be a fully-qualified URL to the tarball; or if it's a > Fedora-hosted project (wherein this packaging *is* the upstream source), you > should add a comment to note it as such. Fixed. > * Does it really need the gettext development environment, or does it just use > the gettext utilities for its translation merging while building? If it just > uses the utilities, then please change the "BuildRequires: gettext-devel" to > simply "BuildRequires: gettext" gettext should be enough. > * You don't need a build-time dependency on libpng-devel, since it's a > dependency of gtk2-devel. Similarly, gnome-vfs2-devel has a depenency on > GConf2-devel, so you should remove libpng-devel and GConf2-devel from your > BuildRequires since they are duplicated entries. Done. Fixed packages at: http://www.gnome.org/~hadess/gnome-web-photo/gnome-web-photo-0.3-2.src.rpm http://www.gnome.org/~hadess/gnome-web-photo/gnome-web-photo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 13:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051359.l85DxI8L028447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-09-05 09:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > A few comment: > - How about a desktop file? > - Would be nice to use %configure and %{_bindir}. > - changelog entry would be nice too > - you should not use the Packager field in fedora packages: your name will be in > the changelog > - url to source tarball should be used > - I would replace "X" by "Cairo" say in the Summary. > > You probably want to run rpmlint on the srpm and rpm to check for more things. > > Very cool clock! :-) Thank you for your comments, I am still learning about building rpms so all help is welcome. I have updated the spec file, and uploaded a new version. I am interested in your question about a desktop file. Where can I find out more about these? Thanks again, Chris. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 14:06:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] New: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zprikryl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zprikryl.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://zprikryl.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp-1.20070905cvs-1.src.rpm Description: Linux DC++ is a program the uses the Direct Connect protocol. It is compatible with other DC clients, such as the original DC from Neomodus, DC++ and derivatives. Linux DC++ also interoperates with all common DC hub software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 14:15:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051415.l85EFJZU028646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-09-05 10:15 EST ------- Guidelines are very useful. :) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 14:37:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051437.l85EbrRq002858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 10:37 EST ------- Only tried to rebuild on dist-f8 and it seems okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=148783 However, as I am now reviewing some other packages, currently I have no time to review this package. I hope someone will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:05:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051505.l85F5qAZ004962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-09-05 11:05 EST ------- Description looks good! It looks good to me. Since you are a first time contributor I can not pass your review but hopefully a sponsor will pop by and run through. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:20:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051520.l85FKYoC007220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 11:20 EST ------- A new snapshot came out yesterday; I've updated the packages. I also did the cleanups you suggested except for adding # The compiler chokes on "-mtune=generic" further on. which I'm afraid I don't understand; the compiler doesn't choke on any platform I have access to. Remaining issues that I know of: The compiler builds two pascal executables, gpidump and binobj, which really tick off find-debuginfo and cause it to fail the build. I have removed these from the package but they are mentioned in the documentation and so it would be nice to package them. I'm concerned that since this is built from pristine gcc sources, it will need additional Fedora patches applied to generate build IDs. A koji scratch build succeeds on all supported platforms, but the ppc compiler is nonfunctional. The ppc64 compiler is fine. I am completely baffled. New spec: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/gpc/gpc.spec New srpm: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/gpc/gpc-4.1.2_20070904-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:25:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051525.l85FPGWL007975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-05 11:25 EST ------- Noah, has this been built? If so, the bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:29:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051529.l85FT4P2008239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-05 11:29 EST ------- Another thing that should be fixed is the make install line. mandir doesn't need to be specified, but bindir does as it's not set by configure script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051536.l85FaWak013095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e | |du) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 11:36 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:45:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051545.l85FjMxV014603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-09-05 11:45 EST ------- Thanks for all the input: (In reply to comment #3) > * Requires > - This package actually requires ghostscript and this package should > have "Requires: ghostscript". Done (In reply to comment #4) > Even GPLv1 is OK, and the License: tag should be "GPL+". Agreed. However, to err on the side of caution I've sent an e-mail to upstream just to make sure how this program is technically licensed is how they personally intended it to be licensed. I agree with the GPL+ version, but just want to confirm that they do as well. :) As soon as I get the ok (or updated sources with correct license) from upstream, I will upload and link my latest changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051551.l85Fp4Jx015537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-05 11:51 EST ------- Some remarks: * Your %install references /usr/lib/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild_parser.src while your %files contains: %{_libdir}/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild_parser.src This doesn't make a visible difference because your package is "noarch", nevertheless this is inconsistent. * The block-delete-/bin/sh magic in %postun can be replaced with a one-line sed-call: sed -e '/RPMREBUILD START/,/RPMREBUILD END/d' ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 15:57:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051557.l85Fv7iY012800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-05 11:57 EST ------- %changelog * Mon Aug 27 2007 Rex Dieter 4.2-5 - -devel: Requires: qt4-devel spec (same URL): http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/PyQt4.spec Re: designer plugin: it's not building, so nothing gets installed, no failures here. Long term, this can/should be fixed, but hopefully it's not a blocker (I don't have the time/nrg to debug this atm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 16:13:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051613.l85GDGIP019143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 12:13 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=187671) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=187671&action=view) patch for micq 0.5.4.2 to fix glibc open issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 16:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051612.l85GCDAZ018929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 16:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051615.l85GF308019944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 12:15 EST ------- Well, lookingly much better!! For 0.5.4.2-2: A. Build issue: 1. glibc "open" issue: - This time, rebuild for 0.5.4.2-2 fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=148606 This is rawhide glibc (2.6.90) "open(2)" change (related discussion here) http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-August/msg00265.html The attached patch should solve this problem. Note: the reason -1 did not fail is because -1 did not pass "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" correctly. 2. Missing BuildRequires - And even after my patch is applied, the build still fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=148844 /usr/bin/enconv is in enca package and at least "BuildRequires: enca" is needed. B. Then: * Description stage -------------------------------------------------------- Authors: Matthew D. Smith (deceased) R?diger Kuhlmann -------------------------------------------------------- - This description is not needed. "AUTHORS" document is enough. * Encoding - Still some man files are in diffferent encodings. -------------------------------------------------------- micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/it/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man5/micqrc.5.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man1/micq.1.gz micq.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pt_BR/man7/micq.7.gz -------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamps - This package installs many text files (and so on) and keeping timestamps on those files are preferable. The following will keep them. ---------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ---------------------------------------------------------- Then, as this is a "sponsor needed" ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 16:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051643.l85GhRXW021448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-05 12:43 EST ------- Cool Thanks Ralf. I have fixed your recommendations. New spec at: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec New srpm at: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 17:00:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226404] Merge Review: sed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051700.l85H0ji8024273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226404 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-05 13:00 EST ------- I'll look into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 17:26:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051726.l85HQVts031870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From paul_kunz at slac.stanford.edu 2007-09-05 13:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #82) > (In reply to comment #81) > > > I'm uncertain of this next step. Should I make a request for "new update" > > of type "bug fix" with bug number being his one? > > Well, "new update" of type "enhancement" with bug number this one. > Then after pushing "submit", select "push to stable". Done. Thanks for helping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 17:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234612] Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051735.l85HZxWW000676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Ice - The Internet Communications Engine (Object middleware) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234612 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 13:35 EST ------- For Fedora 7, when you think it is okay, please request to move from testing to stable using bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 17:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244547] Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051750.l85HoHiG031910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244547 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-05 13:50 EST ------- Well, although I don't know how to use this package (I am not familiar with MySQL or so..), however as no one are reviewing this package (for more than 2 months) I will try to review this. So: As the latest elgg seems 0.8, would you update your spec/srpm to the newest first? Note: /usr -> %_prefix, /var ->%_localstatedir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 18:52:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 14:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709051852.l85IqH5T008823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-09-05 14:52 EST ------- Greak link, the new version with a .desktop file has been uploaded. http://www.theknight.co.uk/releases/tzclock-2.5.3-3.src.rpm Thanks for your help, Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 20:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052051.l85KpkCt005165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-05 16:51 EST ------- I just realized that the broken debuginfo affects your rpm packages, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 20:49:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052049.l85KnR8F004616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-05 16:49 EST ------- The release should be an integer, imho it is in the Naming Guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) So change Release: 9.2%{?dist} to Release: 10%{?dist} You can later use Release: 10%{?dist}.1 If you need to increment only in one Fedora Collection that is not Rawhide. Source0 is not valid (anymore): $ curl -I http://forgeftp.novell.com/flaim/development/flaim/downloads/source/libflaim-4.9.1046.tar.gz HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found According to the URL in the spec file the latest tarball is: libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz Is this older version intentional? The buildroot is not ok, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 You should use %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) or some other example from the wiki. Please use rm -rf %{buildroot} instead of rm -Rf %{buildroot} Did you build your packages with mock? When I build it and run rpmlint on the rpms, I get: $ rpmlint libflaim-* W: libflaim unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libflaim.so.5.2 E: libflaim-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package W: libflaim-devel no-documentation The third warning can be ignored. The build.log shows: ldconfig /var/tmp/libflaim-4.9.1046-build/usr/lib Installation complete. + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/libflaim-4.9.1046 0 blocks find: /var/tmp/libflaim-4.9.1046-build/usr/lib/debug: No such file or directory But I do not know, why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 20:56:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052056.l85KuGUW006003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-05 16:56 EST ------- And Source0: should be a full URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 20:54:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 16:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052054.l85KsdEx032284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-05 16:54 EST ------- GPL is not a valid license tag anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 21:28:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052128.l85LSMGH010511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-05 17:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 21:31:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052131.l85LV77g011175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-05 17:31 EST ------- - rpmlint: ok E: bluez-firmware hardcoded-library-path /lib in configure options this is intended and ok here. - Naming: ok - license: bad There is no indication that this package is redistributable, there is only contact information for the broadcom firmware but no information at all for the ST Microelectronics firmware. I guess this review should block FE-Legal or you should make upstream include license information for the firmware that states that redistribution is allowed. The link to packages.debian.org is imho not enough. 1cc3cefad872e937e05de5a0a2b390dd bluez-firmware-1.2.tar.gz 1cc3cefad872e937e05de5a0a2b390dd bluez-firmware-1.2.tar.gz.1 Suggestion: You can use %%{_lib} in %changelog to show the full name of the _lib macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 21:38:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052138.l85Lcfqg012041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-05 17:38 EST ------- I can't lift FE-Legal here until I see the updated license text either: - Included with the firmware in the zip/tarball (this is strongly preferred) - On the ralink website somewhere As to the license text itself, as attached to bugzilla, it meets the firmware exception criteria. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 21:39:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052139.l85LdUOV007003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 21:50:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052150.l85LoOHI009074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-05 17:50 EST ------- Sorry for the trouble. HTTP should be working again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:07:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052207.l85M7fCp011414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2007-09-05 18:07 EST ------- At Mark Webbink's suggestion, I've added a BCM2033-license.txt file that will further explain the agreement with Broadcom. He is currently in contact with Broadcom Legal and will advise on how to proceed there. As for the ST Microelectronics firmware, I can't find any information anywhere regarding its licensing. Upstream believes that both sets of firmware are freely distributable, but did not give any details beyond the email exchange that's reproduced in the link on packages.debian.org. Updated spec: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/bluez-firmware.spec Updated SRPM: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/bluez-firmware-1.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052231.l85MV8ce028961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - < Desktop news |Desktop news aggregator |aggregator> | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:29:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052229.l85MTcmZ014344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-05 18:29 EST ------- Why do you use 0.2 in the release instead of just 2? The Naming Guidelines ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-5ea39bbc33cf351b41b51325ac3527eff4c58dac ) say; | The release number (referred to in some older documentation as a "vepoch") is | how the maintainer marks build revisions, starting from 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:38:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052238.l85McuBE029947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-05 18:38 EST ------- rpmlint passes without any warnings on the srpm. rpmlint has ChangeLog warnings on the rpm. W: pyvserver incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-0.2.20070723git639686 1.0-0.2.20070830git1e20c7.olpc2 Summary: looked at ctypes code which uses dlopen to find the correct library and should work on multiarch depending on which arch version of libc is being used by python. ChangeLog needs updating - missing an entry Checklist: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Requires a ChangeLog entry, this can be done on import to CVS - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok (GPLv2+) - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Ok - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Ok - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). Ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Ok - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Ok - noarch - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Ok - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Ok - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Ok (no translations) - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Ok (No %{_libdir} libraries) - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Ok (package not relocatable) - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. Ok - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Ok(no large docs) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Ok - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Ok(No libraries) - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Ok (No static libraries) - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Ok (No pkgconfig) - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Ok (no libraries) - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Ok(No devel) - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Ok (No Libraries) - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Ok (no .desktop file) - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. Ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Ok SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Ok - license included - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Ok - built in koji as scratch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052239.l85Mdrlb015809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-05 18:39 EST ------- Did a review. It passes but I will leave it up to Xavier to approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194470] Review Request: php-magickwand In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052250.l85MoG83017561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-magickwand https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194470 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 194470 depends on bug 195864, which changed state. Bug 195864 Summary: ImageMagick-devel doesn't require freetype-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195864 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 22:54:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052254.l85MsMif017863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-05 18:54 EST ------- I use 0.x as long as the packages are in my personal repository in order to not interfere with stuff possibly included in other repos. It will be bumped to 1%{?dist} for the first Fedora package release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:00:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225784] Merge Review: gdbm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052300.l85N0C64018965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gdbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225784 ------- Additional Comments From odvorace at redhat.com 2007-09-05 19:00 EST ------- Hi, bug #162416 is RFE and doesn't block this merge review. It is a request for some additional package that would help to port gdbm files between architectures. Cheers Ondrej. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052322.l85NMsM1022043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052319.l85NJvsb021425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 19:19 EST ------- This has been needinfo for ages now; is anything ever going to happen with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:22:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052322.l85NMOMd021992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-05 19:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IPC-RUN3 Short Description: Run a subprocess in batch mode (a la system) Owners: rc0420203 at freenet.de Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:24:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052324.l85NOdig022192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 19:24 EST ------- Hey, we have approved emacs guidelines now. Finally. It doesn't look like this package quite follows the guidelines, but Jonathan wrote them so I suppose he'd know better than I. Any chance it could be fixed up? Who's actually submitting this package, anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052327.l85NRwlD022771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 19:27 EST ------- Did anything ever happen here? Or were the packages in comment 13 ready for review? I guess the License: tag(s) will need fixing in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:28:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228214] Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052328.l85NSh83022818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ POrtable COmponents framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228214 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(arbiter at arbiterlab| |.net) | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 19:28 EST ------- Well, it's been another month with no response. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:38:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052338.l85Ncw2h005388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-09-05 19:38 EST ------- I am happy to fix the package up in the next day or two (need sleep right now). (In reply to comment #17) > Hey, we have approved emacs guidelines now. Finally. It doesn't look like this > package quite follows the guidelines, but Jonathan wrote them so I suppose he'd > know better than I. Any chance it could be fixed up? > Happy to - will get to it tomorrow (need bed right now). > Who's actually submitting this package, anyway? Well, if Tom is happy to have me as a co-maintainer, I'd suggest we both submit it - it requires some coordination with VM, as there is an element of bootstrapping between the two packages required (I'm the emacs-vm packager, but again, would welcome co-maintainers!). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 5 23:57:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709052357.l85NvNT2008187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(joshuadfranklin at ya| |hoo.com) | ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-09-05 19:57 EST ------- Sorry, I've been on holiday until yesterday and am now getting caught up on work. It may be several more days before I get to this. If this is something a co-maintainer can do, Jima, you're welcome to. I've also created a Fedora account already and signed the CLA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 00:04:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250468] Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060004.l8604EvI008950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vcmd - A developers interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250468 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-05 20:04 EST ------- Looks pretty good, but the license is still wrong since GPL is no longer valid. Please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 00:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060005.l8605C0D027623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-05 20:05 EST ------- > - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible > license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of > Packaging Guidelines. > > Ok (GPLv2+) > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > Ok > This SHOULD be fix to the correct version in spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 00:33:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240333] Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060033.l860XtCG031077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Translator - Manipulate structured data definitions (SQL and more) Alias: perl-SQL-Translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240333 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 20:33 EST ------- Chris, I know you've been around recently; did you still want to submit this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 00:50:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060050.l860oSqK001374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-05 20:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 01:00:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060100.l8610ble015948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-05 21:00 EST ------- I'm working on packages for calc-2.12.2. This upstream release removes the questionable md5 code and, bonus, dynamically links libraries. Should be ready real soon now. In the meantime, you can look at the packages in the link at comment 13 -- if the release number starts with "0", there are known problems (and probably unknown ones) that I'm still working on (but review comments are still welcome). Right now I have it with an option in the spec file which, if "1", converts from LGPL to GPL and links with readline. This is intended to be temporary -- right now, the code is such that there's not a good distinction between the command-line utility and the library. In theory, all readline-dependent functionality could be split out from the library and only the command-line calc program linked against that; then we'd have LGPLv2 for the libs and GPL for the actual program. But that's for the future. Personally, I really value having real readline support (the built-in alternative is nothing close) more than having the libraries LGPL, but upstream really wants the basic libs to be LGPL, which is an understandable position. So I'm taking suggestions for how to set the flag by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 01:11:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060111.l861Bj6q003973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(david at fetter.org) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 21:11 EST ------- Hmm, no response in well over a month. Setting NEEDINFO; I'll close this ticket soon if there's no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 01:47:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060147.l861lQWF021276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-05 21:47 EST ------- Okay, so, I made some time to work on this. The packages you see there now (calc-2.12.2-0.5.fc8.mattdm.gpl.src.rpm et al) look pretty good to me and are ready for review. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 01:46:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060146.l861kqkM021235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #158046|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 01:48:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060148.l861mPu0008053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-05 21:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=188341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=188341&action=view) Mock Build Failure Log Here's the build log from Mock. If I get some free time, I'll look at it a bit to see what's causing the failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 01:50:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060150.l861oMWe021774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 21:50 EST ------- OK, here's an update which solves the build ID issue by including a patch from Fedora's gcc which tells the front ends to pass --build-id to the linker by default. Also, I removed the build dependency on texinfo, as this simply regenerates the info files and brings back all of the file-not-utf8 complaints from rpmlint. So the only remaining issue is PPC. I did some more poking and I understand why the compiler fails to build things (it neglects to pick up the proper paths for crtbegin.o and libgcc.a in the arguments passed to the linker) but I still don't understand why this works on even PPC64 yet fails on PPC32. I have one more idea to try, however. I also want to see if Jakub will have a quick look over this package. I know he doesn't want to incorporate GPC into the main GCC package, and I think that would be a bad idea as long as GPC development continues to lag GCC development. But the "build gcc&gpc and then delete the gcc bits" approach seems to be the only alternative, even though it's not very pretty. New spec: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/gpc/gpc.spec New srpm: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/gpc/gpc-4.1.2_20070904-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 02:19:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060219.l862Jfkn025281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ewan at macmahon.me.u| |k) | ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-09-05 22:19 EST ------- So; I've had a look at the rc2 source and it does indeed contain the relevent fix, and resynthesizer does build happily against it. I'm just in the process of double checking that the resultant package actually functions correctly, but it's looking good. As for the naming; I've chipped in my thoughts on fedora-devel; I'll re-do a package with a new name (of necessary) once there's a conclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 03:21:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: iserverd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060321.l863L4pS002529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iserverd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 23:21 EST ------- OK, this does indeed build fine. rpmlint spews a tonne of messages, but many of them are non-standard-uid or non-standard-gid errors, which are acceptable in this case as the daemon runs under a special user. What remains: E: iserverd non-readable /etc/iserverd/iserv.conf 0600 E: iserverd non-readable /etc/iserverd/v7_proto.conf 0600 E: iserverd non-readable /etc/iserverd/actions.conf 0600 E: iserverd non-readable /etc/iserverd/v3_proto.conf 0600 E: iserverd non-readable /etc/iserverd/v5_proto.conf 0600 E: iserverd non-readable /etc/iserverd/aim_proto.conf 0600 Obviously these are protected against reads for security reasons. E: iserverd executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/iserverd/iserverd.sh E: iserverd executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/iserverd/db/icquser E: iserverd executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/iserverd/iserverd.sh.asp I'm not sure what these are. Shell scripts can be config files (like /etc/rc.local) so it's possible that this is OK. E: iserverd non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/iserverd 0770 This should be OK. W: iserverd file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/iserverd-2.5.5/isdwm-1.4.1.tar.gz This is obviously bogus; tarballs don't have encodings. E: iserverd non-readable /usr/bin/db_manage.sh 0550 E: iserverd non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/db_manage.sh 0550 E: iserverd non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/convert_db.sh 0550 I'm not sure about these; what's are they used for? Should they be in /usr/libexec instead? W: iserverd service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/iserverd This shouldn't be enabled by default, but I note that you chkconfig it off in %post. I don't think you want to do that as then updates will disable the server. Better to patch the initscript if necessary. E: iserverd-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package This is bad, and frankly I don't see what's causing it. It looks like everything's being compiled with the proper compiler flags; unfortunately I simply don't know enough about find-debuginfo to comprehend why it doesn't find anything. The %preun and %postun scripts are weird. You should add the proper dependencies on /sbin/service so you can assume it exists, and there shouldn't be any reason not to unconditionally stop the daemon. I'm not really sure if it matters but you might want to stop it before calling chkconfig --del. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 03:33:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060333.l863XQk2004176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 23:33 EST ------- Another package from this submitter with no response to comments in many weeks. Setting needinfo; I will close this ticket if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 03:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 23:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060339.l863dJ7W024455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-05 23:39 EST ------- Another two months have gone by; this ticket should probably be closed soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 05:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060529.l865TabY004864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 01:29 EST ------- Thanks for the updates - looks better now. :) I would also suggest now removing the superfluous definitions for %name, %version and %release at the top - you will get those for free from the Name, Version and Release fields. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 05:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060550.l865oZuV007592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 01:50 EST ------- formal review: rpmlint: gnome-web-photo.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-web-photo.schemas this follows existing practise, thus is ok gnome-web-photo.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.2 0.3-2.fc8 should be fixed gnome-web-photo.i386: W: invalid-license GPL must be fixed (see below) gnome-web-photo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 38, tab: line 38) unimportant package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: - I don't think there is any reason to use %{__rm} - You need a %postun for gconf schemas, I believe - The preferred form of the requires is perl(XML::Parser) license: unclear, COPYING is GPLv2, but the sources all say LGPLv2+, should be clarified upstream license field: should be updated to match the result of aforementioned clarification license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file legibility: ok upstream sources: ok build: fails, see below excludearch: n/a build reqs: misses libjpeg-devel %find_lang: ok shared library symlinks: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: n/a %doc content: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui apps: ok directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 06:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 02:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060627.l866RttH024974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-06 02:27 EST ------- Hey, hold on, shouldn't the package name in CVS (and in the summary for this review request for tools that operate on them) be perl-IPC-Run3, not perl-IPC-RUN3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 06:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 02:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060637.l866b3eI026130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-RUN3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-06 02:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Hey, hold on, shouldn't the package name in CVS (and in the summary for this > review request for tools that operate on them) be perl-IPC-Run3, not perl-IPC-RUN3? You are right. tar ball's name is IPC-Run3, as well as the perl module is called IPC3/Run3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 07:44:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 03:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060744.l867ikQ3001598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 03:44 EST ------- rpmlint says: W: mondo invalid-license GPL E: mondo non-utf8-spec-file mondo.spec W: mondo macro-in-%changelog attr W: mondo macro-in-%changelog done W: mondo macro-in-%changelog d Please change license to GPLv2 or GPLv2+ . Convert your spec file to UTF-8. Remove macros (%attr, %done, %d) from changelog entries, you can remove the "%" sign and leave only the "attr macro" string. Your localized summary lines are too loing. They can be only 80 characters long. The ".fc7" tag is hardcoded into spec file. Please change it to "%{?dist}". Update changelog entries to more Fedora notation. Change this: * Fri Jul 06 2007 Bruno Cornec 2.2.4-1.fc7 to: * Fri Jul 06 2007 Bruno Cornec - 2.2.4-1.fc7 ("-" sign has been added) I think your changelog is too long and may be reduced. I think svn.log is not needed in package documentation, ChangeLog is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 07:51:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 03:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060751.l867pZHD022019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 03:51 EST ------- OK, new update ChangeLog: - added forgotten enca to BuildRequires - updated description (removed author) - install keeps file tempstamps New package URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/micq-0.5.4.2-3.fc7.src.rpm I am unable to detect, which encoding has been used for mentioned man pages. Author of micq has been contacted to give me more information and contacting man page authors is planned. Before they tell me more, I can't update them. :( Where I need to put reviewed package bug numbers? Here? There is one (mondo): 187318 Can you tell me how your report reviews has been generated? They are very nice. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 08:17:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 04:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060817.l868HOve007503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 04:17 EST ------- Looks OK for me. Rpmlint is quiet. No other problems found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 08:26:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 04:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060826.l868Qgjv008914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbarabas at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 08:30:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 04:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060830.l868UvgQ009587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 04:30 EST ------- rpmlint says: W: fuse-python invalid-license GPL W: fuse-python mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 6) Please change license to GPLv2 or GPLv2+ . Do not mix tabs and spaces in spec file. I think python-fuse name is better, but fuse-python is not bad too. %{python_sitearch}/fuseparts directory is not owned by packages. Please add an %dir %{python_sitearch}/fuseparts into spec file. Add these files to documentation: examples + it's content README.1st maybe README.historic too and maybe PKG-INFO too, which contains many interesting information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:01:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060901.l86910GK013201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 05:00 EST ------- Package Review: Use parallel make - Support parallel make when possible (check the section "Parallel make" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) You can try to add %{?_smp_mflags} to make parameters. May be "install -p" need to be used to preserve init script modification time. I think you can remove commented requires. New spec an rpm: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/openser.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/openser-1.2.2-7.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226404] Merge Review: sed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060911.l869BdPX014595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226404 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-06 05:11 EST ------- - rpmlint is silent - the package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - the spec file name matches the base package %{name} X the package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - please remove glibc from requires and buildrequires, and remove version from the glibc-devel buildrequirement as newer glibc packages are in currently supported releases - consider changing URL to http://sed.sourceforge.net/ - add -p option to preserve the timestamp for sedfaq - replace %makeinstall with make DESTDIR=... - the package is licensed with a Fedora approved license - the License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2+) X if the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - please add COPYING and COPYING.DOC to %doc - the spec file is written in American English - the spec file for the package is legible - the sources used to build the package matches the upstream source X all build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - gawk is missing (until FESCo approves a new package listing for buildroot) - the spec file handles locales properly - the package owns all directories that it creates - the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing - permissions on files are set properly - the package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - the package consistently uses macros - the package contains code, or permissible content - files included as %doc don't affect the runtime of the application - the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages - at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 - scriptlets are sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060918.l869Inuh001750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] New: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ondrejj at salstar.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/aspell-sk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/aspell-sk-0.52-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Provides the word list/dictionaries for the following: Slovak This is an Slovak dictionary for aspell. Why aspell dictionaries are binary and not "noarch" packages? Rpmlint is not happy with this. Is it OK or I need to update my package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252257] Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060942.l869gwsO005251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MogileFS-Server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252257 rmo at sunnmore.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rmo at sunnmore.net ------- Additional Comments From rmo at sunnmore.net 2007-09-06 05:42 EST ------- Shouldn't these modules also be included as build requires and/or requires? : Warning: prerequisite Gearman::Client 1.07 not found. Warning: prerequisite Gearman::Client::Async 0.93 not found. Warning: prerequisite Gearman::Server 1.08 not found. Warning: prerequisite Net::Netmask 0 not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:45:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060945.l869jeY9005829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-09-06 05:45 EST ------- Hello Ondej, I will review this request this week. Thank you for submitting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 09:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709060954.l869sRlf019881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-09-06 05:54 EST ------- Fixed it :-) It was taken from an example on the Mandriva site, I should not trust them ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 10:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 06:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061025.l86APhnj023897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|mmahut at redhat.com |varekova at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-09-06 06:25 EST ------- Transferring to my colleague Ivana after agreement. She's our aspell guru :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 10:40:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 06:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061040.l86AeYY0025842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 06:40 EST ------- There are more rpmlint errors on binary packages. They have been fixed in my new packages: * Thu Sep 6 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) 0.2-2 - changed permissions for sitearch files to 644 - added fuseparts dir to package - added egg-info directory with it's content - license changed to LGPLv2, according to documentation and sources - added provides for python-fuse (remove it on rename) http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/fuse-python.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/fuse-python-0.2-2.fc7.src.rpm May be it needs to be renamed to python-fuse, but I don't know it it needs a new Review Request ticket or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 10:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 06:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061046.l86AkCSP013139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-06 06:46 EST ------- Thanks for your help. Patrice, your comments are incorporate in gnuplot-4.2.0-4.fc8. Jonathan, I'm not sure about your comments but 0,2/ I don't think this should be done (0/ the common system is to call subpackage the way it is now - there are only two exceptions (emacs-git, emacs-gtypist).) 1,3/ I will look to this point more precisely - now I'm not sure about the right directory/what should be done with attached files Could you please look to gnuplot-4.2.0-4.fc8 whether this version is good enough to get fedora-review flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:16:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226120] Merge Review: make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061116.l86BGZhX030346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-06 07:16 EST ------- I'll look into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:38:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061138.l86BcXN7000388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-06 07:38 EST ------- Follow-through on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b In particular, request membership in the cvsextras Group, and I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061137.l86Bblp0000342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-06 07:37 EST ------- Good work :), it is almost error free, I found only three problems which should be fixed before the review flag will be granted: * There is necessary to have aspell >= 12:0.60 because of there is incompatibility between world lists generated with aspell 0.52 and 0.60 (and there is necessary to add epoch tag) * There should be set debug_package to %{nil} - it prevents to create empty debuginfo package * I'm not sure why there is mv configure reconfigure ./reconfigure I'm not sure why there is not used only ./configure That's all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:35:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061135.l86BZ6jB019058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 07:35 EST ------- rpmlint: ok W: tomcat-native devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libtcnative-1.so intended and explained in spec naming: ok license: ok (ASL 2.0) license in %doc: ok spec legible: ok sources match: ok 8d2eaef338a1a02f3d929a575d5e1453 tomcat-native-1.1.10-src.tar.gz 8d2eaef338a1a02f3d929a575d5e1453 tomcat-native-1.1.10-src.tar.gz.1 source is url: ok exclude arch: not needed for x86, others not checked: ok ldconfig run: ok build requires: ok (builds in mock for F7, i386) directory ownage: ok macro usage: ok -devel, -static: not needed: ok %doc: not too large: ok debuginfo: not empty: ok APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:40:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061140.l86Beb2e000861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-06 07:40 EST ------- oh, and let me/us know your Fedora Account System username, so I know who exactly to sponsor... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:41:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061141.l86BfEbf019784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 07:41 EST ------- It seems that this is your first package and you need to be sponsored, for details take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Therefore I block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 11:49:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275081] Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061149.l86BnGsg001648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275081 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 07:49 EST ------- You should use rpm-macros instead of hardcoded paths: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros >From your spec: /usr/share/applications/fedora-*.desktop make prefix=/usr %config(noreplace) /etc/xen/xenscreenrc make prefix=/usr DESTDIR=%{buildroot} STRIP="" install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:01:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061201.l86C19MF022210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 08:01 EST ------- Please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby There is something like this missing: Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 Name should be: ruby-RRDtool Seems you should use in the beginning of the spec: %{!?ruby_sitearch: %define ruby_sitearch %(ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["sitearchdir"]')} and %{ruby_sitearch} in %files A Provide ruby(LIBRARY) = VERSION line is missing. Maybe more, I just ran over the ruby guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061206.l86C6IKY004280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 08:06 EST ------- Andrew, please set fedora-review flag to ? to show that you will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061215.l86CFXK6024050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 08:15 EST ------- OK, thanks for review. Things updated. The configure is updated as "sh configure" without rename to be rpmlint quiet. * Thu Sep 06 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 0.52-3 - changed requirement to aspell >= 12:0.60 because of there worldlist incompatibility - debug_package set to nil to prevent empty debuginfo package - configure is called with sh interpreter to prevent rpmlint errors New package: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/aspell-sk-0.52-3.fc7.src.rpm spec file URL has been not changed, only content updated. There are still rpmlint errors: E: aspell-sk no-binary E: aspell-sk only-non-binary-in-usr-lib but they are on all aspell-LANG packages. May be all of them need to be set as "noarch" packages. What do you think? Depend they on different architectures? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:37:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061237.l86CbGuZ008293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 08:37 EST ------- You do not use the python_sitelib and pyver macros, therefore you should not define them. %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} %{!?pyver: %define pyver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:34:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250469] Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061234.l86CYipa026136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-security - A metapackage for the OLPC security platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250469 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 08:34 EST ------- You should use %{_sysconfdir} instead of hardcoded etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061238.l86CcYZb026732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 08:38 EST ------- In an i386 Fedora 7 mock buld I get: opietest: completed 13 tests. 11 tests passed, 2 tests skipped, 0 tests failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061242.l86CgSUE009000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-09-06 08:42 EST ------- * RPM name is OK * Builds fine in mock * File list looks OK X Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) X rpmlint is not silent, see below * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * %clean is present. X sources are listed twice - Please remove Source0 * spec file for the package is legible * package builds properly * package installs properly ? package doesn't use locales * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no -devel package * no -docs subpackage is necessary * no pkgconfig files * good use of macros * content is permissable * %doc has no affect on runtime * no static libraries present X package owns directories already owned by aother package - Please remove %dir %{_datadir}/applications/ and %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ * package contains %{name}.desktop file, desktop-file-install command present SHOULD: X package doesn't contains LICENSE file * no Non-English languages in description or summary * build tested on mock-build x86_64 and i386 * tested functionaloty of package rpmlint: W: pguiman-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pguiman-0.0.1/src/database/create_db_objects.c W: pguiman-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pguiman-0.0.1/src/tools/db_profile_manager.c W: pguiman-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pguiman-0.0.1/src/GUI_db_objects/domain.c ... Simple solution: remove execution bit from all files *.c *.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:47:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061247.l86CliMg027978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-06 08:47 EST ------- Yes this package is arch dependent due to the world-list directory transformation (which is realize during the make phase). This errors are OK, there is no problem with them. Looks fine for me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:47:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061247.l86ClrAR028013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-06 08:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #63) > Re: designer plugin: it's not building, so nothing gets installed, > no failures here. - Well, what do you mean here? build.log shows: ----------------------------------------------- rm -f libpythonplugin.so g++ -shared -o libpythonplugin.so pluginloader.o moc_pluginloader.o -L/usr/lib -lpython2.5 -lQtScript -lQtXml -lQtGui -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lQtCore -lQtDesigner -lpthread make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/PyQt-x11-gpl-4.2/designer' ----------------------------------------------- So the seemingly-plugin "libpythonplugin.so" seems to be created actually, however installing this fails due to the issue on comment 59. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:56:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061256.l86CucHn011066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 08:56 EST ------- On http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing the NRL License is listed and the license tag should be "BSD with advertising". The TIN License looks pretty similiar in vimdiff, so just ask spot to add the TIN License to the Licensing page. Btw. where does the opiessh.c come from? There are some compiler warnings because of a missing #include and no return statement for main. I guess "return execv(argv[0],argv);" would be good enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 12:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226120] Merge Review: make In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061254.l86CskNC010522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: make https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226120 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-06 08:54 EST ------- OK: - rpmlint is silent - the package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - the spec file name matches the base package %{name} - the package is licensed with a Fedora approved license - the License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2+) - the spec file is written in American English - the spec file for the package is legible - the sources used to build the package matches the upstream source - all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires - the spec file handles locales properly - the package owns all directories that it creates - the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing - permissions on files are set properly - the package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - the package consistently uses macros - the package contains code, or permissible content - files included as %doc don't affect the runtime of the application - the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages - at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - all filenames in the package are valid UTF-8 - scriptlets are sane Need some work: - please add COPYING and AUTHORS files to %doc - unused siglist patch should be removed in CVS - would be nice to have a symlink for man page gmake.1.gz -> make.1.gz - please consider removing the first hunk in the noclock patch and removing the config/missing calls as nothing else is touching configure.in - I'd suggest removing the second paragraph from the package description, users don't really need to have make installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061308.l86D8MXK012728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 09:08 EST ------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts - Usage of conflicts need to be approved, I asked on fedora packaging list about this: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-September/msg00010.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:13:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061313.l86DD6r4013630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 ------- Additional Comments From mbarabas at redhat.com 2007-09-06 09:13 EST ------- - (In reply to comment #5) > Random comments: > > - it crashes when you don't have vsftpd installed looking for way how to check, if vsftpd is installed (whithout using rpm - other systems). > - any line of the sort: > > syslog = commands.getoutput( 'cat /var/log/messages''* | grep vsftpd' ) > > seems *very wrong* you're right .. this is very wrong solution. Looking for some third party log parser. > - help->about doesn't do anything done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:16:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061316.l86DGhE4014330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 09:16 EST ------- You need to provide instructions in the spec how to create the tarball, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 instead of scons PREFIX=/usr you should use scons PREFIX=%{_prefix} The cvs Tag should be in release, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a A good value for version would be imho 0, to make sure there are no conflicts, once upstream uses a versioning schema -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061319.l86DJBbK014460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 09:19 EST ------- ocaml-camlp5 4.08 was released recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:33:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061333.l86DXwQQ002424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 09:33 EST ------- You should mention in the spec that the tarball is from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-1rpm4.src.rpm Or maybe even using above URL as Source0: works. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Also maybe you should use %setup -q -n rpmrebuild instead of %setup -c rpmrebuild. Or extract the src.rpm from above URL with rpmdev-extract instead of extracting the tarball manually before you add it to the srpm. Which is imho the preferred way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:34:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061334.l86DYqbw002553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-06 09:34 EST ------- my build.log doesn't include that, nor do my builds fail. ?? http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/x86_64/build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:41:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061341.l86DfrbR017844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 09:41 EST ------- I forgot, you need to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join since the Fedora Account System seems not to know you. I already made this bug blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253858] Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061347.l86DloMZ018724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-vsftpd - graphical utility for administrating vsftpd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253858 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061350.l86DoZYn005265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-06 09:50 EST ------- Till, I havent made the account yet because the docs says only to make an account once I have a sponsor. Thanks, AS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 13:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061356.l86Duw6n006296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 09:56 EST ------- The src url doesn't work. wget fails with "20 redirections exceeded." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061406.l86E6Aiq022338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-06 10:06 EST ------- Sourceforge is sucking a lot right now, and won't let me download the sources from anywhere. Hopefully that's only temporary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225679] Merge Review: dejagnu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061403.l86E3PmO009320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225679 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-06 10:03 EST ------- I'll look into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061412.l86ECdBq023393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-06 10:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > formal review: > gnome-web-photo.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.2 0.3-2.fc8 > > should be fixed Typo, fixed. > gnome-web-photo.i386: W: invalid-license GPL > > must be fixed (see below) LGPLv2.1+ as per COPYING.README. I believe GPL refers to some of the build tools/scripts. > gnome-web-photo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 38, tab: line 38) > > unimportant Fixed anyway. > package name: ok > spec file name: ok > packaging guidelines: > - I don't think there is any reason to use %{__rm} Fixed. > - You need a %postun for gconf schemas, I believe The schemas is removed in %preun, nothing to do in %postun, as the schemas's already gone. > - The preferred form of the requires is perl(XML::Parser) > license: unclear, COPYING is GPLv2, but the sources all say LGPLv2+, > should be clarified upstream See above. > license field: should be updated to match the result of aforementioned > clarification Done. > license file: ok I put just the COPYING.README, should I also package the COPYING.LGPL? > build reqs: misses libjpeg-devel Fixed. http://www.gnome.org/~hadess/gnome-web-photo/gnome-web-photo-0.3-3.src.rpm http://www.gnome.org/~hadess/gnome-web-photo/gnome-web-photo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:12:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] New: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cpebenito at tresys.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools.spec SRPM URL: http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools-3.3.1-1.src.rpm Description: GUI and command line tools for analyzing SELinux policy and monitoring. This is a preexisting package that I'd like to take over maintenance of. The current maintainer (Dan Walsh) is on board with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061412.l86ECAhA012009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-06 10:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #65) > my build.log doesn't include that, nor do my builds fail. ?? > http://kde-redhat.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/PyQt4/x86_64/build.log Umm.. Actually it seems that ( for 4.2-5 ) libpythonplugin.so is built on both i386, ppc, but not on x86_64. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=149620&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=149622&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=149624&name=build.log I found that on x86_64 build log says: ----------------------------------------------------- Creating pyrcc4 Makefile... Qt Designer plugin disabled because Python library is static <==== Creating pyqtconfig.py... + make -j2 ------------------------------------------------------ Perhaps this needs investigating (on i386, ppc this comment is not seen) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:19:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061419.l86EJuYR024584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 10:19 EST ------- Preliminary comments: devel should require %{name} = %{version}-%{release} devel needs to require pkgconfig could use %{?_smp_mflags}, maybe should use %{_includedir} in the file list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:19:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061419.l86EJBTe013303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-09-06 10:19 EST ------- This is my first package, and Dan Walsh will be sponsoring me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:25:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061425.l86EPc3l026437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-06 10:25 EST ------- Hello Patrice, please could you look to zlib-1.2.3-14, it seems for me to be right now - there is used automake but I think every other parts are clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:30:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061430.l86EUYFF015955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 10:30 EST ------- This seems to be a pre release snaphsot, so the release should start with 0. Also you can use 0 for the Version instead of 0.0. So here is my proposal: Version: 0 Release: 0.1.svn2744%{?dist} You should also include the date of the checkout, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages If the checkouts you want to package are normally more than a day old, you can also use the date to specify which version you want to checkout, e.g. svn -r "{20070901}" export svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom flashrom Then you do not need to carry the svn revision. Hint: # svn -r 2744 co svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom flashrom # rm -rf flashrom/.svn you can use svn export instead of co to avoid the creation of the .svn directory. You should use install -D -p -m644 %{name}.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 to install the manpage (-p is added here) to preserve the timestamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:55:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061455.l86Etm6i021628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-06 10:55 EST ------- Hi Till, Thanks for assigning yourself to this. (In reply to comment #3) > The release should be an integer, imho it is in the Naming Guidelines > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) > > So change > Release: 9.2%{?dist} > to > Release: 10%{?dist} > > You can later use > Release: 10%{?dist}.1 > If you need to increment only in one Fedora Collection that is not Rawhide. > > Source0 is not valid (anymore): > $ curl -I > http://forgeftp.novell.com/flaim/development/flaim/downloads/source/libflaim-4.9.1046.tar.gz > HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found > > According to the URL in the spec file the latest tarball is: libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz > > Is this older version intentional? The version being built is newer, essentially a subversion checkout therefore I have made the necessary changes to reflect this. > The buildroot is not ok, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 > > You should use %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) or > some other example from the wiki. Okay, done. > Please use rm -rf %{buildroot} instead of rm -Rf %{buildroot} Okay, done. > Did you build your packages with mock? When I build it and run rpmlint on the > rpms, I get: > $ rpmlint libflaim-* > W: libflaim unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libflaim.so.5.2 > E: libflaim-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package > W: libflaim-devel no-documentation > > The third warning can be ignored. The build.log shows: > ldconfig /var/tmp/libflaim-4.9.1046-build/usr/lib > Installation complete. > + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/libflaim-4.9.1046 > 0 blocks > find: /var/tmp/libflaim-4.9.1046-build/usr/lib/debug: No such file or directory > > But I do not know, why. This was because the shared object was not installed executable - I have attached a small patch to resolve this and should hopefully get this upstream quickly. Updated RPMS as usual at: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/libflaim/ Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:01:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061501.l86F11Su000801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-06 11:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This seems to be a pre release snaphsot, so the release should start with 0. > Also you can use 0 for the Version instead of 0.0. So here is my proposal: > Version: 0 > Release: 0.1.svn2744%{?dist} > You should also include the date of the checkout... Done. > # svn -r 2744 co svn://linuxbios.org/repos/trunk/util/flashrom flashrom > # rm -rf flashrom/.svn > you can use svn export instead of co to avoid the creation of the .svn directory. Applied, thanks. Until now I never heard about such option :) > You should use > install -D -p -m644 %{name}.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 > to install the manpage (-p is added here) to preserve the timestamp. Done. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/flashrom.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/flashrom-0-0.1.20070830svn2753.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 14:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 10:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061459.l86ExSgW021973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-06 10:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Preliminary comments: > > devel should require %{name} = %{version}-%{release} I don't really agree with that one, but I fixed it anyway. > devel needs to require pkgconfig And glib2-devel, mysql-devel and curl-devel, otherwise it won't link... > could use %{?_smp_mflags}, maybe Fixed. > should use %{_includedir} in the file list Don't know how I didn't see that. http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gmyth/gmyth.spec http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gmyth/gmyth-0.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:08:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061508.l86F8fVP002458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-06 11:08 EST ------- Now updated to calc 2.12.2.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:07:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061507.l86F7GFV002321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-06 11:07 EST ------- Thanks for additions. One more thing - missing BuildRequire: which http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openser-1.2.2-8.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:11:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061511.l86FBc6r024636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-06 11:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > New package URL: > http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/micq-0.5.4.2-3.fc7.src.rpm > > I am unable to detect, which encoding has been used for mentioned man pages. I guess that the encoding is actually ISO-8859-1, however it seems that the usage of "convmv" is wrong. It seems that the lines ------------------------------------------------- convmv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 -r doc/de/ convmv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 -r doc/pt_BR/ convmv -f iso8859-1 -t UTF-8 -r doc/it/ ------------------------------------------------- actually do nothing. Would you just use normal "iconv"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:18:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061518.l86FIU81004815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 ------- Additional Comments From odvorace at redhat.com 2007-09-06 11:18 EST ------- Hi, links to corrected spec file and srpm: Spec URL: http://pguiman.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/pguiman/trunk/pguiman.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pguiman/pguiman-0.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Comments: MUST: "X Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake)" ## added SMP flags "X sources are listed twice - Please remove Source0" ## left only sourceforge.net source "X package owns directories already owned by aother package - Please remove %dir %{_datadir}/applications/ and %{_datadir}/pixmaps/" ## removed %dir %{_datadir}/applications/ and %dir %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ from spec file SHOULD: "X package doesn't contains LICENSE file" ## the licence text is in the COPYING file rpmlint: "W: pguiman-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pguiman-0.0.1/src/database/create_db_objects.c W: pguiman-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pguiman-0.0.1/src/tools/db_profile_manager.c W: pguiman-debuginfo spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pguiman-0.0.1/src/GUI_db_objects/domain.c ... Simple solution: remove execution bit from all files *.c *.h" ## removed execution bit from all files *.c *h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:18:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061518.l86FIq3h026126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-06 11:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > What about the proposal here, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/TeXNaming > > that is add virtual Provides to texlive related packages? > > This is more for post-import, but may be discussed before. Yup, I think the virtual provides for the texlive packages is a good idea, we can add them and tex-foo seems reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:17:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061517.l86FH7wU025924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-06 11:17 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tomcat-native Short Description: Tomcat native library Owners: scop Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061523.l86FNhaL005840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-06 11:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Can you tell me how your report reviews has been generated? > They are very nice. :) How? Well, I don't know how to answer to this question, however: * First we have to check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and "so on". Actually there are many cases in which we also have to check other guidelines, mostly under: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ * Then I just say that we come to know how to review requests and to write the review results after we try more and more reviews :) Actually I have reviewed more that 170 packages. Some reviewers use some templates for reviews, while I don't use templates... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:22:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] New: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kvolny at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp.spec SRPM URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp-0.1.3.1-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Hello. I just packed qmmp for use in Fedora. Qmmp stands for "Qt-based MultiMedia Player" which is quite selfexplaining, although it supports audio only. The player resembles old WinAmp/XMMS style. This package disables support for ffmpeg and mad to meet the no-mp3 policy. The SRPM contains Czech translation which is not yet available upstream (this is the reason why the .tar.bz2 differs from the one downloadable at the project page). This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:24:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061524.l86FO4hi005923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 kvolny at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:32:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061532.l86FWM2k007368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 11:32 EST ------- Oops, wrong URL, sorry. http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/micq-0.5.4.2-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061531.l86FVRlY007268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 11:31 EST ------- > I guess that the encoding is actually ISO-8859-1, however it seems > that the usage of "convmv" is wrong. It seems that the lines > actually do nothing. Would you just use normal "iconv"? Yes, done. You are right, that convmv is wrong. http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/micq-0.5.4.2-3.fc7.src.rpm rpmlint now says only a warning about example script in documentation, which can be OK by me. Anything else wrong in this package? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:31:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061531.l86FVivq007309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 11:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) http://forgeftp.novell.com/flaim/development/flaim/downloads/source/libflaim-4.9.1046.tar.gz > > HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found > > > > According to the URL in the spec file the latest tarball is: > libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz > > > > Is this older version intentional? > > The version being built is newer, essentially a subversion checkout therefore I > have made the necessary changes to reflect this. This still needs some work. I do not understand where the 1046 comes from in the Version tag. Is this the svn revision? Did you built the svn snapshot yourself? In this case, you need to add instructions to the spec how to rebuild the snapshot, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 The URL in Source0 does not work here: $ curl --insecure -I https://forgesvn1.novell.com/svn/flaim/libflaim-4.9.1046.tar.gz HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found [...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:36:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061536.l86FadKU029927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 11:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Can you tell me how your report reviews has been generated? > > They are very nice. :) > > How? Well, I don't know how to answer to this question, however: They looked very nice for me and I think, you are using an automated tool except rpmlint. :-) Now I can work better with rpmlink (after more reviews) and I am able to make similiar reports, but I am too lazy to write that nice as you. :-) > * First we have to check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > and "so on". Actually there are many cases in which we also > have to check other guidelines, mostly under: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ Done. > * Then I just say that we come to know how to review requests > and to write the review results after we try more and more reviews :) > Actually I have reviewed more that 170 packages. Hmm, is is more tham 4% of all Fedora packages. Good work. :-) OK, there are my another reviews: 250904 fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE 254142 OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server and my first approved package: 280211 aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 15:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061550.l86Fo6jx010462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 11:50 EST ------- rpmlint: ok (silent) naming: ok (no upstream versioning, yet, version 0 should not conflict with any version) license: ok (GPLv2+, license text not included, but refered to in source files) spec legible: ok source0: svn checkout, instructions included, tarball matches own export: ok ExcludeArch: ppc, ppc64: bugs need to be filed against FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 once the package is imported BuildRequires: ok, builds in mock for i386, F7 no library / devel stuff: ok directory ownage: ok %files section: no duplicates, defattr specified:ok rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install and %clean: ok %changelog format: ok APPROVED, don't forget to file bugs against the Excludearch blocker bugs. Optional: Can you ask upstream to add an license header to udelay.c and include a copy of their license in the repository? There are some build warnings that should be reported upstream: layout.c: In function 'read_romlayout': layout.c:114: warning: ignoring return value of 'fscanf', declared with attribute warn_unused_result flashrom.c: In function 'main': flashrom.c:402: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result flashrom.c:421: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061615.l86GFnnQ014342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-06 12:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > ============================================== > This package (ice) is APPROVED by me > ============================================== Please ignore this line... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061618.l86GIf3S014592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 12:18 EST ------- For the license: yes, please include the license file that applies to the source, ie COPYING.LGPL, if it is in the upstream tarball. The rest looks fine now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061615.l86GFktv003970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 ------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org 2007-09-06 12:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=188891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=188891&action=view) cpanspec output without generated license code per request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061618.l86GInaR004203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-06 12:18 EST ------- Axel are you still here ? Please comments if something seems wrong to you... Maybe someone can help packaging perl scripts if you are short in time ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:15:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061615.l86GF4LN003824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-06 12:15 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (micq) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------- ============================================== This package (ice) is APPROVED by me ============================================== Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061651.l86Gpktk020697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 12:51 EST ------- > > devel should require %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > I don't really agree with that one, but I fixed it anyway. Do you disagree with the %{name+ part, or the %{release} part ? I only care about %{release}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:50:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061650.l86Go56q020439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-IPC- |Review Request: perl-IPC- |RUN3 - Run a subprocess in |Run3 - Run a subprocess in |batch mode |batch mode ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-06 12:50 EST ------- In that case, for CVS admins: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-IPC-RUN3 Please rename to perl-IPC-Run3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 16:57:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061657.l86GvmqF010524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-09-06 12:57 EST ------- Because there is no official stable distrubtion of the upstream package, I will revoke thsi review. Please feel free to restart a new review request if a stable version is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 17:10:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061710.l86HAJHe023606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 13:10 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/gmyth-*.rpm gmyth.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gmyth-0.4/NEWS gmyth.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gmyth-0.4/README should just remove those gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_monitor_handler.h gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_uri.h gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_uri.c gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_file.h gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_file_local.h gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_file_transfer.c gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_file_local.c gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_file_transfer.h gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_file.c gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_livetv.h gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_livetv.c these should probably be fixed gmyth-devel.i386: W: no-documentation ignorable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 17:42:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 13:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061742.l86HgBi0028451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-06 13:42 EST ------- package names: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: COPYING is GPL, sources say LGPL - what gives ? should seek upstream clarification license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file readable: ok upstream sources: not verified, see above buildable: ok exludearch: n/a BRs: ok locale handling: ok shared lib scriptlets: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok, except for the rpmlint complaint above %clean: ok macro use: ok content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc content: ok header files: ok static libs: n/a pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel requirement: ok la files: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 18:00:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061800.l86I0Kbv031441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-09-06 14:00 EST ------- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20070905185634.WDPK17393.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com%40ALAN Looks like they did exactly as we asked. Updated package here: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/inchi-1.0.2-0.1.fc7.src.rpm http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/inchi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 18:07:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061807.l86I7eIg021356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 14:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: micq Short Description: Text/line based ICQ client with many features Owners: ondrejj Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 18:09:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061809.l86I96QX021430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-09-06 14:09 EST ------- New files: http://bagu.org/eclipse/eclipse-egit.spec http://bagu.org/eclipse/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > I'll take this. Things are generally pretty good. There are just a few minor > things (lines beginning with NEEDS_FIX) and some questions (lines beginning with ?): > > MUST items: > > OK package is named appropriately > OK is it legal for Fedora to distribute this? > ? license field matches the actual license. > - it says in the git web repo that some of it is LGPL ... but I can't see > what parts - can you? I'm okay with the dual GPLv2 and EPL as that's what > I can see. The tests are LGPL but we're not shipping them. Should I add LGPL to the License line because it's included in the src.rpm? > OK license is open source-compatible. > OK specfile name matches %{name} > ? verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - I can't get the same md5sum but the contents are the same. Did you use wget? No, wget doesn't work with the git web repo. I manually clicked on the link to get the file. > OK skim the summary and description for typos, etc. > OK correct buildroot > OK if %{?dist} is used, it should be in that form (note the ? and % locations) > OK license text included in package and marked with %doc > - license text included in jar so can't mark as %doc > OK packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) > OK rpmlint on .srpm gives no output > $ rpmlint eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.src.rpm > W: eclipse-egit invalid-license EPL GPLv2 > > - this is fine since it's dual-licensed software > > OK changelog should be in one of these formats: > [...] > OK Packager tag should not be used > OK Vendor tag should not be used > OK Distribution tag should not be used > OK use License and not Copyright > OK Summary tag should not end in a period > OK if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) > OK specfile is legible > OK package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 > OK BuildRequires are proper > OK summary should be a short and concise description of the package > OK description expands upon summary (don't include installation instructions) > OK make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - they are, where possible > OK specfile written in American English > OK make a -doc sub-package if necessary > OK packages including libraries should exclude static libraries if possible > OK don't use rpath > OK config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) > OK GUI apps should contain .desktop files > OK should the package contain a -devel sub-package? > OK use macros appropriately and consistently > OK don't use %makeinstall > OK install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} > OK locale data handling correct (find_lang) > OK consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > OK split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines > OK package should probably not be relocatable > OK package contains code > OK package should own all directories and files > OK there should be no %files duplicates > OK file permissions should be okay; %defattrs should be present > NEEDS_FIX %clean should be present > - you have ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT elsewhere Fixed. > OK %doc files should not affect runtime > OK if it is a web app, it should be in /usr/share/%{name} and *not* /var/www > NEEDS_FIX verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > > - do we need a Requires on eclipse-platform? Yes, it should have that. Fixed. > $ rpm -qp --requires > ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.x86_64.rpm > /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db > /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db > java-1.5.0-gcj >= 1.5.0 > java-1.5.0-gcj >= 1.5.0 > libc.so.6()(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) > libdl.so.2()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) > libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) > libm.so.6()(64bit) > libpthread.so.0()(64bit) > librt.so.1()(64bit) > libz.so.1()(64bit) > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rtld(GNU_HASH) > > $ rpm -qp --provides > ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.x86_64.rpm > org.spearce.egit.core_0.2.2.200708311149.jar.so()(64bit) > org.spearce.egit.ui_0.2.2.200708311149.jar.so()(64bit) > org.spearce.jgit_0.2.2.200708311149.jar.so()(64bit) > eclipse-egit = 0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8 > > NEEDS_FIX run rpmlint on the binary RPMs > > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/eclipse-egit-0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8.x86_64.rpm > W: eclipse-egit no-documentation > - okay > W: eclipse-egit incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.2-1.fc8 > 0.2.2-0.git20070826.fc8 > - please fix Fixed. > W: eclipse-egit invalid-license EPL GPLv2 > - this is fine ... unless we discover some LGPL stuff > > SHOULD items: > > OK package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc > - fine > ? package should build on i386 > - it builds on x86_64 :) > OK package should build in mock > NEEDS_FIX we should probably fill in some of feature.xml such as the licence section I added the information that I could. This patch really needs to be upstream so that this information can be filled in properly. > ? should there be any user-visible eclipse features other than Team->Share? > No checkout? I know you said they were making a new release soon with a > whole bunch of new features so should we wait until then? I'm legitimately > asking, not trying to be snide. IMO this plugin needs a lot of work to be functional. I asked one of the developers about their timeline but haven't received a reply yet. > I notice a lot of stuff being spewed to the > console as well ... do they have a bug tracker upstream? No, not that I know of. > I guess what I'm > trying to say is that we shouldn't have it be installed by default in the > Eclipse group of comps.xml just yet. What do you think? That seems reasonable. > ? should we split the package into two: the java git implementation and the > eclipse plugin? I guess we can do that in the future if anything else > starts using the java git implementation Yeah, I think it should be kept together until something needs it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 18:41:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061841.l86If00S006009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-09-06 14:40 EST ------- OK, my Fedora username is joshuadf and I've send the request. I implemented the MUST items and enabled passfile, but didn't see your diff until after I'd typed the changes myself. http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine-0.999-3.fc7.src.rpm http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 19:06:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281281] New: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281281 Summary: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/netpipe.spec SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/netpipe-3.7.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: NetPIPE is a protocol independent performance tool that visually represents the network performance under a variety of conditions.x It performs simple ping-pong tests, bouncing messages of increasing size between two processes, whether across a network or within an SMP system. Message sizes are chosen at regular intervals, and with slight perturbations, to provide a complete test of the communication system. Each data point involves many ping-pong tests to provide an accurate timing. Latencies are calculated by dividing the round trip time in half for small messages ( < 64 Bytes ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 19:20:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061920.l86JKrZA000402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-06 15:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aspell-sk Short Description: Slovak dictionaries for Aspell Owners: ondrejj Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: ondrejj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 19:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061938.l86JcgHT014815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-06 15:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 19:42:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061942.l86Jgx17003952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-06 15:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 19:50:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061950.l86JovR8017022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-06 15:50 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 19:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 15:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709061951.l86JpBoF005483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-06 15:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:30:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062030.l86KURBA011096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-06 16:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > This still needs some work. I do not understand where the 1046 comes from in the > Version tag. Is this the svn revision? It was, kinda, sorta. I had used the some RPMS from a SUSE developers repo as a starting point and that tarball was included as source. I can't figure out how it was generated as pulling from svn also brings down a number of other header files and such which cause the build to fail. Therefore I've downgraded the spec a little to an official release which builds fine using the patch. The patch was accepted upstream today btw. I have uploaded new builds. Rpmlint is quiet on these now. Cheers Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:36:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226585] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062036.l86KanDC011908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-cyrix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226585 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-06 16:36 EST ------- Fixed in 1.1.0-5. Marking as CLOSED/RAWHIDE, please reopen if you find anything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226611] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062041.l86KfYBL024577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-nsc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226611 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-06 16:41 EST ------- Fixed in rawhide. Marking resolved, please reopen if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062039.l86Kd3ko024025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency. | |de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:39:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062039.l86Kdu8k024072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas.bierfert at lowlatency. | |de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:39:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226610] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062039.l86KdnEP012149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-neomagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226610 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-06 16:39 EST ------- Fixed in 1.1.1-4. Marking closed, please reopen if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:47:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226632] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062047.l86KloPm025313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-vga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226632 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-06 16:47 EST ------- Fixed in rawhide. Marking as resolved, please reopen if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 20:44:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226622] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062044.l86KiQBs012828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-sisusb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226622 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-06 16:44 EST ------- Fixed in rawhide. Marking as resolved, please reopen if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 21:08:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226633] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062108.l86L8L47027992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226633 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-06 17:08 EST ------- Yeah, that's intentional. libwhateverXvMC.so are client-side drivers, the missing symbols come from libXvMC.so itself, and they're only ever dlopened so there's no reason to ldconfig. Marking as fixed in rawhide, please reopen if I'm wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 21:22:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062122.l86LM6NE018005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 17:22 EST ------- - rpmlint: ok W: libflaim-devel no-documentation - naming: ok - versioning: ok - license: BAD/TODO License Tag ist LGPLv2 but license is GPLv2 license text (GPLv2) is included and mentioned in source files - rpm legible: ok - source: ok url points to correct file: cbd0caf6239cffb7640391eda7551d4a libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz cbd0caf6239cffb7640391eda7551d4a libflaim-4.9.989.tar.gz.1 - builds in mock for F7, i386 - ldconfig run: ok - directory ownage: ok - buildroot: ok - %files: no dupes and correct defattr: ok - no -static needed: ok - no libtool files: ok - .so file without suffix in devel: ok - %install and %clean with rm: ok - -devel requires of mainpackage: ok - todo before import: * add a libflaim prefix to the patch, i.e. rename it to: libflaim-permissions.patch * fix license tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 21:37:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062137.l86LbG3t031892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 17:37 EST ------- - This should have a calc- prefix: Source2: COPYING-GPL - The -devel package should require the -libs package, not the main package. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. the -devel and -libs packages do not have a %defattr line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 22:04:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062204.l86M42ih003019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-06 18:04 EST ------- - Conflicts should be ok. (see the previously mentioned thread) - Building with mock gives an error: + install -m 0644 -p 'fonts/*.pcf.gz' /var/tmp/knm_new-fonts-1.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/fonts/knm_new-fonts/ install: cannot stat `fonts/*.pcf.gz': No such file or directory this install -m 0644 -p fonts/*.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/ should be changed to install -m 0644 -p *.pcf.gz $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{fontdir}/ - this should be removed because it is not used: %define buildsubdir %{name}-%{version} - in %prep instead of %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} cd $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} tar xfz %{SOURCE0} this should be used: %setup -q -n fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 22:33:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] New: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xsc/xsc.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xsc/xsc-1.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The object is to blast a hole in the rings and destroy the enemy ship. The only problem is that it tracks your every move and as soon as you knock a hole in all three rings, and they all line up, it lets loose with the big nasty green fireballs. Avoid them. Avoid the little green buzzers, too. Shoot 'em if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 22:51:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062251.l86MpAQw010464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-06 18:51 EST ------- Thank you very much. > - This should have a calc- prefix: > Source2: COPYING-GPL Even when it's the unmodified, canonical GPL file? > - The -devel package should require the -libs package, not the main package. Thanks. Actually, probably more files should be moved to the libs package, too. > the -devel and -libs packages do not have a %defattr line I believe the one from %files carries through. But sure, I'll fix it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 22:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265841] Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062256.l86MuqSO031184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265841 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-06 18:56 EST ------- If this contains kernel modules, you really should read over http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/KernelModules and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules and you should also be aware of the current proposals working their way through the process, such as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DavidWoodhouse/KmodProposal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 23:03:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 19:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062303.l86N3EpK031801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-09-06 19:03 EST ------- Updated spec file: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb.spec Hven't had chance to test it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 23:14:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 19:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062314.l86NEttD013188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 Bug 251128 depends on bug 251110, which changed state. Bug 251110 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 6 23:14:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 19:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251110] Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709062314.l86NEt7q013164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Run3 - Run a subprocess in batch mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251110 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-06 19:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > CVS done. Toshio, your renamer missed to alter the NAME inside of the /Makefile's. Don't know where else you and/or your pkgdb might have missed it. imported, built, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 00:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 20:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070006.l87061rs019369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-06 20:06 EST ------- Okay, new packages up. Fixed a couple more things I noticed while I was at it. Thanks again. * Wed Sep 05 2007 Matthew Miller - 2.12.2.1-2 - allow customlib functions with -DCUSTOM. - made stdrc subpackage for standard resource files and scripts. - only ship internal line-editor keybindings file if we're not using readline - fix some packaging issues as follows (thanks Till Maas). - Prefix COPYING-GPL source file with "calc" to avoid file conflicts. Just in case. :) - defattr for all files sections. - make the devel package rely on calc-libs, not calc. This is largely academic since the calc libs and binaries are not as clearly separated as they should be -- a future upstream version will improve this, though, so we might as well do the right thing. - make calc-libs not require calc proper; theoretically this should be true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 00:56:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 20:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070056.l870u109012761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-06 20:56 EST ------- Wait, hold off on that one. More coming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 01:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 21:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070118.l871IK6q027705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-06 21:18 EST ------- No, I take that back. I thought I'd discovered that the new version had detangled the readline-using parts of the command-line tool better from the library, but turns out not. Let's just go ahead with what I have now and I'll work with upstream further on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 03:06:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070306.l87362kd030192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-09-06 23:06 EST ------- Thanks for the review Till! Regarding the stub client package, I have considered eliminating it, but I'm afraid this would just complicate matters going forward, for the following reasons: * our plans will require that separate package in the near future, so eliminating it just to add it a bit later on will just make a mess of deps. * the Requires: section is different for the client, and collapsing things into a single package will pull in things that are not required on the server/client. Overall, I think we're better off with the additional package. As for the rest of your comments, they are easy to address, I'll do so in the next minor release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 05:13:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 01:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] New: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/cheese-0.2.4-1.src.rpm Description: cheese is a cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam. It also provides some graphical effects in order to please the users play instinct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 05:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 01:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070519.l875JNZI014267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-07 01:19 EST ------- Note that a earlier view of this program was submitted for review and closed after a time period of non-response at #248314. This spec file is based on that but updated to meet the new licensing guidelines and earlier review. Thanks to Parag for the pre-review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 05:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 01:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] New: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/cheese/cheese.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/cheese/cheese-0.2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Cheese is a Photobooth-inspired GNOME application for taking pictures and videos from a webcam. It also includes fancy graphical effects based on the gstreamer-backend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:07:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248314] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070607.l8767Y5v032222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248314 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 02:07 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 281891 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:07:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070607.l8767Z4v032246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |splinux25 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 02:07 EST ------- *** Bug 248314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070610.l876AHYo032708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 02:10 EST ------- Oh, what timing! Please discuss with Rahul who will be the maintainer of cheese (bug 281891) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:14:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070614.l876EumA020882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:14 EST ------- Urgh, I did the very same thing today: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 My packaging was done independently; maybe comparing it can lead to an optimal end result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070616.l876GvNY021391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:16 EST ------- After a quick glance at your spec, there are 2 things that my packaging does better: - don't use a vendor prefix for the desktop file - produce a meaningful debuginfo package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:17:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273761] Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070617.l876H3HT021425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat-native - Tomcat native library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273761 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-07 02:17 EST ------- Built for devel an EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:21:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070621.l876LYuU001537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 sbehera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sbehera at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nabi Short Description: Hangul X Input Method Owners: sbehera Branches: F-7 InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:32:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070632.l876Wken002834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:32 EST ------- Matthias, A vendor prefix was added based on an earlier review and a new draft was proposed to clarify this though it hasn't been ratified yet. I can close this review request if you want me to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:30:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070630.l876UaFi002644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-07 02:30 EST ------- Package built for FC6, F7, F8 (devel) and EL5. Unable to build for EL4 according to dependency problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070639.l876dHfn023889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > - Building with mock gives an error: > + install -m 0644 -p 'fonts/*.pcf.gz' > /var/tmp/knm_new-fonts-1.1-1.fc7-root-mockbuild/usr/share/fonts/knm_new-fonts/ > install: cannot stat `fonts/*.pcf.gz': No such file or directory Doh. my bad. however: > - in %prep > instead of > %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} > cd $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} > tar xfz %{SOURCE0} > this should be used: > %setup -q -n fonts I'm worrying about following that since "fonts" is too generic and it might affects to others perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070648.l876mGF8024979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 mbarabas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mbarabas at redhat.com |odvorace at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070649.l876n3AM025013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:49 EST ------- Ok, updated. hopefully it should works enough. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm_new-fonts/knm_new-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/knm_new-fonts/knm_new-fonts-1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 06:55:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 02:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070655.l876t7k4005435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2007-09-07 02:55 EST ------- I correct those errors. Spec URL: http://zprikryl.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://zprikryl.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp-0-0.1.20070905cvs.src.rpm Description: Linux DC++ is a program the uses the Direct Connect protocol. It is compatible with other DC clients, such as the original DC from Neomodus, DC++ and derivatives. Linux DC++ also interoperates with all common DC hub software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 07:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 03:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070746.l877kCTP032041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 03:46 EST ------- You need to "Buildrequire: synergy" too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 07:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 03:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070757.l877vJpg013014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 ------- Additional Comments From odvorace at redhat.com 2007-09-07 03:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pguiman Short Description: The PostgreSQL database server managing tool Owners: odvorace Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:10:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070810.l878AfME015481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 04:10 EST ------- Hello, Andrew: Well, I must say there are some issues to be fixed on your spec file. You can check how to write your spec file on the following URL. Please read them first. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines A. Description stage: * SourceURL - For sourceforge source, please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * BuildRequires - "gcc" is in the "expection" of BuildRequires (see "Exceptions" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) B. %prep/%build/%install stage * Macros - Please use macros properly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros For example, /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. * Debuginfo issue http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo - Please don't strip binaries by yourself. Stripping binaries disables to create debuginfo rpm. * Timestamp - Please keep timestamp. When using "install" command, add "-p" option. * desktop-file-install - Desktop file must be installed by using "desktop-file-install" ("BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" is needed) - Note: Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed (please check "desktop-file-install" usage). * GTK+ icon - For 48x48 desktop icon, please move it to %_datadir/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps and call gtk-update-icon-cache (please check: "GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) C. scriptlets * update-desktop-database - The included desktop file does not contain any mime type and calling "update-desktop-database" is not needed. D. %files entry * Documents - File "INSTALL" is for people who want to compile and install this package by themselves and not needed for people installing this package by using rpm. * gettext .mo file - Gettext .mo files should be installed by using %find_lang. Check the section "Handling Locale Files" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Other things are: * Rebuild - Rebuild itself fails. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=150879 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:20:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070820.l878K1lr004754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-07 04:20 EST ------- OK, thanks. But I still can't checkout such module: [petro at Sulaco FE]$ cvs co flashrom cvs server: cannot find module `flashrom' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules [petro at Sulaco FE]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:24:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070824.l878OX54017359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|odvorace at redhat.com |mbarabas at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 04:24 EST ------- ( Well, at some time there was a suggestion that the assignee should be back to the submitter after the review is accepted, however now it is not. Please leave the assignee as it is even after the review is accepted ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:31:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070831.l878VHhJ006543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-07 04:31 EST ------- I think Jens can be good Reviewer for this package. Removing myself from review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:31:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070831.l878VfHH006596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-07 04:31 EST ------- I think Jens can be good Reviewer for this package. Removing myself from review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:56:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070856.l878uWhu021846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-07 04:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > - todo before import: > * add a libflaim prefix to the patch, i.e. rename it to: > libflaim-permissions.patch Okay, done. > * fix license tag Okay, done. Cheers Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 08:54:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 04:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070854.l878s9tZ009377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno_cornec at hp.com 2007-09-07 04:54 EST ------- The version of busybox used by mindi is statically linked. So I have a patch to handle that as it's not supported in busybox 1.2.x. I have the need for precise functions built-in and some other *NOT* built in (such as modules support). I keep using an older version of busybox as that binary is cfritical for our tool, and I don't want to pass my time testing newer versions all the time. I need a very stable busybox for the recovery env, for which e.g. NFS is no problem ... 3 good reasons IMO for the project to keep a separated package for that. For afio and buffer I can also provide packages for fedora if there is a need indeed to provide them (I thought they were already part of the distro and didn't check that indeed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 09:02:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 05:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070902.l8792JlX010662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 05:02 EST ------- You need to follow this http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess You are at step 8 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 09:10:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 05:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070910.l879ADTB011851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 05:10 EST ------- Package is APPROVED, you need to follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess (step 8) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 09:25:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 05:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070925.l879PLL6026053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-07 05:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libflaim Short Description: Flaim Database Engine Owners: snecker Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 09:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 05:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709070956.l879uqmc018640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-07 05:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flashrom Short Description: Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content Owners: peter Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 10:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071001.l87A1OZq031295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-07 06:01 EST ------- I just build gnuplot-4.2.0-5.fc8 when emacs files are moved to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/gnuplot subdirectory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 10:28:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071028.l87AS561002087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(qark at ospace.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 06:28 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 10:24:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071024.l87AOZJl001535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 06:24 EST ------- Once Blocking NEEDSPONSOR as Dan is not a sponsor member. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 10:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071036.l87Aa66f003353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 qark at ospace.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(qark at ospace.net) | ------- Additional Comments From qark at ospace.net 2007-09-07 06:36 EST ------- I'm sorry, I've been busy last few days. I'll fix issues and provide updated package by the end of this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 11:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071107.l87B7SIt027300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-07 07:07 EST ------- I have missed to check noarch rpm. There was many errors. They have been fixed by me here: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/python-xlrd.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/python-xlrd-0.6.1-2.fc7.src.rpm * Fri Sep 7 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) 0.6.1-2 - namewithoutprefix removed, too complicated and not required - added directory xlrd - permissions for python scripts set to 644 - files converted from DOS line-feeds to UNIX format - "#!/usr/bin/env python" added to beginning runxlrd script - removed doc and examples from site-packages/xlrd directory I have installed and tested this package on my example xls file. Works as expected. Anybody can approve this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 11:22:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071122.l87BMxbU029196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 11:28:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071128.l87BSQ2t009502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-07 07:28 EST ------- Sean, can you review my changes and package functionality? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 11:29:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225679] Merge Review: dejagnu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071129.l87BT0sA009613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dejagnu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225679 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-07 07:28 EST ------- Ok: - rpmlint output W: dejagnu devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/dejagnu/testglue.c W: dejagnu devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/dejagnu.h W: dejagnu devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/dejagnu/stub-loader.c - the *.c files are part of the testsuite - dejagnu.h could be placed in devel subpackage, but in this case I think it's ok to keep it as it is - the package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - the spec file name matches the base package %{name} - the package is licensed with a Fedora approved license - the License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2+) - file containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc - the spec file is written in American English - the spec file for the package is legible - the sources used to build the package match the upstream source - the package owns all directories that it creates - the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing - permissions on files are set properly - the package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - the package consistently uses macros - the package contains code, or permissible content - files included as %doc don't affect the runtime of the application - the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages - at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8 Need some work: - -n dejagnu-%{version} in %setup isn't necessary - make in %build can be removed, there is nothing to build - expect dependency doesn't need to use a version, 5.21 is very old - tcl dependency is not required, expect depends on tcl - jadetex docbook-utils-pdf tetex-dvips are not required during build, the tarball contains generated overview.pdf - mv doc/html doc/overview doesn't seem to be necessary - please use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install-man for man installation - BuildArchitecture should be just BuildArch - %{version} could be used in Source - expect should be in BuildRequires for %check. But the test suite seems to have tests that are supposed to fail, so I'd suggest removing %check completely or modifying the tests so make check doesn't need -k and || :, and regressions will be caught in the build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 11:48:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071148.l87Bm7IC012144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 07:48 EST ------- Vendor prefixes just don't make sense. Your bug number is lower, so you get to pick which review request you want to close... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 12:19:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071219.l87CJwX2003526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-07 08:19 EST ------- Closing off bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 12:26:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071226.l87CQAAD017472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 08:26 EST ------- *** Bug 281891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 12:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281891] Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071226.l87CQ91B017437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A cheesy program to take pictures and videos from your web cam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281891 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 08:26 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 281901 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 12:56:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] New: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/isync.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/isync-1.0.3-1.fc7.i386/isync-1.0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes isync is a command line application which synchronizes mailboxes; currently Maildir and IMAP4 mailboxes are supported. New messages, message deletions and flag changes can be propagated both ways. isync is suitable for use in IMAP-disconnected mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 12:58:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 08:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071258.l87CwKRs008627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |isync-review ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-07 08:58 EST ------- rpmlint is silent on all generated packages. The build logs from mock can help you review the package: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/isync-1.0.3-1.fc7.i386/ Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 13:00:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071300.l87D0Avj009168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 13:16:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071316.l87DGWHj025120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-07 09:16 EST ------- I added an openssl-devel dependency to enable SSL support and bumped the Revision by one. And thus, here are the actual files: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/isync.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/isync-1.0.3-2.fc7.i386/isync-1.0.3-2.fc7.src.rpm Mock output is http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/isync-1.0.3-2.fc7.i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 13:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071348.l87DmZw7029730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm | |ail.com) ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-07 09:48 EST ------- ping kelly ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:23:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071423.l87ENIP9003443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-07 10:23 EST ------- >From the spec file: BuildRequires: gstreamer-plugins-good-devel That doesn't seem to be checked for or used anywhere. Did you mean to have the package itself as a requires instead? (make sure you require a version of gstreamer-plugins-good that has v4l2 plugins as well) BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel BuildRequires: libXxf86vm-devel what are those used for? There doesn't seem to be any X checks or headers used in the sources. Should the Source be that instead? http://live.gnome.org/Cheese/Releases?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071432.l87EWgGQ005314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-07 10:32 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xine-lib New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: scop,abompard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071443.l87EhiAs025169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 10:43 EST ------- > That doesn't seem to be checked for or used anywhere. Did you mean to have the > package itself as a requires instead? (make sure you require a version of > gstreamer-plugins-good that has v4l2 plugins as well) Probably right. > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel > BuildRequires: libXxf86vm-devel > > what are those used for? There doesn't seem to be any X checks or headers used > in the sources. I added them because the build fails without them... > Should the Source be that instead? > http://live.gnome.org/Cheese/Releases?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz In the best of all possible worlds, yes in the real world, "make source" can't handle the ? in the url -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:40:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071440.l87EeCXk024732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-07 10:40 EST ------- rpmlint output: W: cheese mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 47) (unimportant) - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. No problems there, although this sounds a bit weird (unneeded?) "It also includes fancy graphical effects based on the gstreamer-backend." - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. See above. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK Looks good apart from the few comments in comment #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:46:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071446.l87EkUBn008260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-07 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > That doesn't seem to be checked for or used anywhere. Did you mean to have the > > package itself as a requires instead? (make sure you require a version of > > gstreamer-plugins-good that has v4l2 plugins as well) > > Probably right. FYI, it's gstreamer-plugins-good >= 0.10.6-2 > > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel > > BuildRequires: libXxf86vm-devel > > > > what are those used for? There doesn't seem to be any X checks or headers used > > in the sources. > > I added them because the build fails without them... Missing BRs in gtk+? > > Should the Source be that instead? > > > http://live.gnome.org/Cheese/Releases?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > In the best of all possible worlds, yes > in the real world, "make source" can't handle the ? in the url Never mind then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071445.l87EjwPS008108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-07 10:45 EST ------- The package don't build with IcedTea (derived OpenJDK normally shipped with F8) ... [javac] 119. ERROR in /home/fons/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.0/build/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools/src/de/loskutov/anyedit/util/TextUtil.java (at line 856) [javac] case '?': [javac] ^^^^^^^^ [javac] Duplicate case [javac] ---------- [javac] 119 problems (46 errors, 73 warnings) Like Peter say the correct buildpath used in Fedora is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) If you fix the above build problems and the buildpath, I would be happy to pre-review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 14:57:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071457.l87Ev0OR027295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 10:56 EST ------- > Missing BRs in gtk+? No, the cheese "configure" checks for them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 15:08:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071508.l87F8VWU011875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-09-07 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > The package don't build with IcedTea (derived OpenJDK normally shipped with F8) ok, this package was submitted before icedtea. i'll take a look at it. and thanks for letting me know! > Like Peter say the correct buildpath used in Fedora is > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) again, that is not the preferred buildpath. read the packaging guidelines link i posted in comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 15:13:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071513.l87FDX6M012871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-07 11:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > again, that is not the preferred buildpath. read the packaging guidelines link > i posted in comment #2. Strange I have never see such a buildpath in a package but yes if it's in the guideline that may do the trick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 15:12:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071512.l87FC4UR012696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 11:12 EST ------- I will review it now completely. Here is a little hint: Do not write the release in the 0.1 from the release in the tarball oder directory. Otherwise you will have to rebuild the tarball everytime to only want to increase the release without changing the tarball, e.g. due to Requires-adjustment oder because of a mandatory rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 15:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] New: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec SRPM URL: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: dblatex is a program that transforms your SGML/XMLDocBook documents to DVI, PostScript or PDF by translating them into pure LaTeX as a first process. MathML 2.0 markups are supported, too. It started as a clone of DB2LaTeX. Authors: -------- Beno?t Guillon Andreas Hoenen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 15:39:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071539.l87Fd10H002015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-07 11:39 EST ------- python-bsddb3 is no longer needed independently as it comes along with python. did a little bit change in spec file . koji build from scratch ran succesfully. see here for koji build status. [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=151311&name=build.log] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 15:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071552.l87FqsB4005178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-07 11:52 EST ------- With the BRs/Requires for gstreamer-plugins-good(-devel) fixed, this looks good to push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 16:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071612.l87GCoTl009079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 12:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/radeontool.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/radeontool-1.5-2.fc7.src.rpm - add Conflicts with old pm-utils package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 16:13:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071613.l87GDr1P009185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 12:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/vbetool-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm - ExcludeArch: ppc and ppc64 (does not build there) - add Conflicts with old pm-utils package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 16:16:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071616.l87GGRHD024908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 16:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071615.l87GFkgb024722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 12:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cheese Short Description: A webcam application for snapshots and movies Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 16:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071622.l87GM3Qc025863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 12:22 EST ------- Operator error... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 16:54:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239336] Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071654.l87GsRaX016256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunderbird-enigmail - Enigmail extension for Mozilla Thunderbird https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239336 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071706.l87H6klZ000646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-09-07 13:06 EST ------- Naturally the alpine team released a new version while I was working on it. The rpdoc.patch is no longer necessary, and the problematic file is gone from the tarball: http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine-0.9999-2.fc7.src.rpm http://staff.washington.edu/joshuadf/alpine/alpine.spec There is a good chance 0.9999 will become alpine 1.0. By the way, I have tested an upgrade from livna pine and everything went smoothly. I have local mbox and remote IMAP folders, and my password does not contain any local codepage chars. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071719.l87HJ0Aa020171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-07 13:19 EST ------- armacycles-ad-0.2.8.2.1-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:15:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071715.l87HFhsC019733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-07 13:15 EST ------- OK, proceed with requesting cvs branches... and then import. Good work. (and then folks interesting in comaintaining, like jima and I, can request additional access). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:19:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251529] Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071719.l87HJ25j002688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: armacycles-ad - A lightcycle game in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251529 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2.8.2.1-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:19:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071719.l87HJtgu002788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.21.1-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:19:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071719.l87HJr24020519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-07 13:19 EST ------- HippoDraw-1.21.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:38:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071738.l87HclnS006387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 lightsolphoenix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From lightsolphoenix at gmail.com 2007-09-07 13:38 EST ------- Sorry, back in school, you know. I'll make the adjustments this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 17:48:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071748.l87Hmb7j026310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-09-07 13:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alpine Short Description: UW Alpine mail user agent Owners: joshuadf,jima,rdieter Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:24:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071824.l87IOR1S015165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-07 14:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071824.l87IO7g0015103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From michael at laptop.org 2007-09-07 14:24 EST ------- This pre-release should fix the License field and the ChangeLog warning. New spec file: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SPECS/pyvserver.spec New SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SRPMS/pyvserver-1.0-0.3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:33:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071833.l87IXWx7002982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-07 14:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071829.l87ITD8Y002041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-07 14:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071837.l87Ibllo017870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-07 14:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:39:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205798] Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071839.l87Ide7h018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xine-lib - The Xine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205798 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-07 14:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:42:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071842.l87IgQeM004863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-07 14:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 18:54:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071854.l87Is1hY006487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nsantos at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-07 14:54 EST ------- I've done a review of the SRPM provided, here are some comments: - tarfile matches upstream with the following md5 sum: $ md5sum classads-1.0rc2.tar.gz d3e08a8706b0ad405048192d5f049d28 classads-1.0rc2.tar.gz - managed to build rpms for i386: $ sudo rpmbuild -ba classads.spec error: Failed build dependencies: pcre-devel is needed by classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386 $ rpm -qa|grep pcre pcre-6.6-1.1 $ sudo rpmbuild -ba classads.spec --nodeps [...] Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.src.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-devel-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-static-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm Note: pcre was installed but pcre-devel was not; rpmbuild still completed successfully, so you may want to double check the need for pcre-devel. - rpmlint gives the following output: $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.src.rpm W: classads invalid-license Condor Public License W: classads strange-permission classads.spec 0600 $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm W: classads invalid-license Condor Public License $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-devel-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm W: classads-devel invalid-license Condor Public License $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-static-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm W: classads-static invalid-license Condor Public License $ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm W: classads-debuginfo invalid-license Condor Public License I understand the license issue is being worked on, the specfile permissions should be corrected. - checked provides of the built binary rpms: $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm --provides libclassad.so.0 libclassad_ns.so.0 classads = 1.0-0.1.rc2 $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-devel-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm --provides classads-devel = 1.0-0.1.rc2 $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-static-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm --provides classads-static = 1.0-0.1.rc2 $ rpm -qp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/classads-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm --provides libclassad.so.0.0.0.debug libclassad_ns.so.0.0.0.debug classads-debuginfo = 1.0-0.1.rc2 Seems the three remaining issues are dealing with the licensing, fixing the permissions on the specfile, and confirming or removing the pcre-devel dependency; everything else looks good. Nuno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 19:41:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071941.l87JfwU3001886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-09-07 15:41 EST ------- SPEC URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/rmyers/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-1.fc8.src.rpm changelog: * Fri Sep 7 2007 Rob Myers 1.8.2-1 - update to 1.8.2 - update unicode patch for IcedTea compatibility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 19:35:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071935.l87JZakl016423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-07 15:35 EST ------- Packages updated: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-6.src.rpm My comments: - I've read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join. There it states: "Create an account in the Fedora Account System *when you have found a sponsor and got your package approved*" - My package haven't gotten a sponsor and I my package hasn't been approved, so I haven't created an account yet. - I looked around the web, and I didn't find any examples of anyone using a src.rpm as Source0: on their specs. I have added some comments to document the fact that the tar.gz upstream file is coming from a src.rpm. - I have contacted the upstream developer, and I have asked him to make the tar.gz available officially via the sf.net site. - I've read the comments on BUG 177841, and I am doing the best I can with this package with the time I have in my hands, I unfortunately will not have much time left to review other packages. I might potentially in the future be able to submit other packages, but I want to be able to get my first one 'officially' in to get used to the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 19:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] New: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfarrellee at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor.spec SRPM URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor-6.9.5-0.1.20070907cvs.src.rpm Description: Condor is a specialized workload management system for compute-intensive jobs. Like other full-featured batch systems, Condor provides a job queueing mechanism, scheduling policy, priority scheme, resource monitoring, and resource management. Users submit their serial or parallel jobs to Condor, Condor places them into a queue, chooses when and where to run the jobs based upon a policy, carefully monitors their progress, and ultimately informs the user upon completion. NOTES: 1) The license is currently unacceptable, but negotiations are nearly complete for a compatible license 2) I'm not sure what to do about the non-standard-uid error 3) I don't know how to handle the no-soname warning in -devel 4) The permissions on /var/lib/condor/execute are intentional -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 19:59:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709071959.l87JxQxP028014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nsantos at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 20:00:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072000.l87K0XOw029095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 16:00 EST ------- It is not wrong that you do not have an account. It was the reason why you need to follow the page I showed you. People that have an account and are sponsored need to follow the steps on another page. One steps in PackageMaintainers/Join was to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, what I also did for you. But I also might have been wrong, so I explained to you, why I decided to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. However, I hope your confusion about comment:10 is now blown away. If you do not have time to review other packages, then chances to be sponsored are low, because a sponsor has nothing to decide, whether or not you know the guidelines well enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 20:33:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072033.l87KXeEn017496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2007-09-07 16:33 EST ------- I believe that Anderson is following the proper steps .... from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join "Create an account in the Fedora Account System when you have found a sponsor and got your package approved" Anderson does not have a sponsor and does not have his package approved. It is true that he would be helping by looking at other packages and making notes but, as said in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join: "Read some other package submissions to learn about packaging and gain familiarity with the process and requirements." Once he gets a sponsor, packaged approved, then an account he can get in the fedorabugs group as stated: "Now, repeat the process using fedorabugs as the Groupname. This will allow you to make changes to the state of bugs in Bugzilla, which is what you'll need to do to get them checked in. It will also allow you to do complete package reviews, including approving packages yourself!" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 20:47:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072047.l87KlYbW020271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-07 16:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Note: pcre was installed but pcre-devel was not; rpmbuild still completed > successfully, so you may want to double check the need for pcre-devel. The code will use POSIX regex (regcomp/regexec) if pcre is not available, and fall back to no regex support if neither is available. If this is a problem I could probably change the way configure.ac works to fail if pcre is not available, and modify the spec to require pcre during configure's run. Though it might be ok to just not specify --nodeps. I've updated the SRPM to fix the classads.spec permissions, please re-download. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 20:54:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072054.l87KsAmm021412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-07 16:54 EST ------- ADDITIONAL NOTE: You will need F7 or RHEL 3 to compile this code. I recommend compiling with mock and a f7-i386 config. Support for RHEL 4+5 is forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 20:55:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249365] Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072055.l87KtI8p009161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From joshuadfranklin at yahoo.com 2007-09-07 16:55 EST ------- OK, devel built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=18087 Since alpine 1.0 release will be very soon, I wouldn't mind waiting to build for other tags. Maybe everyone who was watching this bug could bang on the binary with their own local (al)pine configurations. Closing with NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 20:58:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072058.l87KwptG022244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|opensource at till.name | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-07 16:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I believe that Anderson is following the proper steps .... from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Did this review request block FE-NEEDSPONSOR before I changed it? No, it did not. I quote from PackageMaintainers/Join: | Some potential sponsors will look at the FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug in bugzilla to find | packages to review. You can add your package to this list by editing your review | request bug and adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the 'Bug xyz blocks' field (where xyz | is the bug number for your review request). Sorry, I do not know how to express myself in English good enough, if it is still not clear what I wrote, then please ignore it completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072208.l87M8bwu020688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-07 18:08 EST ------- Just to clarify, I used --nodeps just to verify the dependency, I'm not suggesting it should be built that way. I would suggest leaving the pcre/pcre-devel dependency in, if that results in a better environment for the program/build. Just built in mock, all looks good: $ mock -r fedora-devel-i386.cfg classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while create cache setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ ls -alF /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result total 4492 drwxr-sr-x 2 nsantos mock 4096 Sep 7 18:06 ./ drwxr-sr-x 5 nsantos mock 4096 Sep 7 18:00 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 200735 Sep 7 18:06 build.log -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 458011 Sep 7 18:06 classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 894714 Sep 7 18:02 classads-1.0-0.1.rc2.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 2317851 Sep 7 18:06 classads-debuginfo-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 100282 Sep 7 18:06 classads-devel-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 557919 Sep 7 18:06 classads-static-1.0-0.1.rc2.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 165 Sep 7 18:00 mockconfig.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 19295 Sep 7 18:06 root.log $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/*.rpm W: classads invalid-license Condor Public License W: classads invalid-license Condor Public License W: classads-debuginfo invalid-license Condor Public License W: classads-devel invalid-license Condor Public License W: classads-static invalid-license Condor Public License -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:10:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072210.l87MAXGp001517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nsantos at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072217.l87MHsWH002317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-07 18:17 EST ------- In i386, you should be building with fedora-devel-i386.cfg, as this is what will go into the next Fedora release (F8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:18:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072218.l87MIjmn022431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:21:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072221.l87ML8P8003018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072219.l87MJVWY002399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |snecklifter at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 22:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072230.l87MUdqZ024328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-07 18:30 EST ------- Sorry for the noise folks. I would like to re-open this review request. Spec URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net.spec SRPM URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm Comments: - This is a mono package and find-debuginfo.sh is failing to generate the requisite package, though I understand this is somewhat commonplace. - Nant is used to build the package with Strong Name signing. - Rpmlint is quiet on source, no doc error on devel and complains about no binary in binary rpm. I understand the latter is also not a blocker. I am already the maintainer of a couple of other packages and log4net forms part of around 4-5 which require iFolder to work on Fedora. Comments appreciated. Cheers Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 7 23:34:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 19:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709072334.l87NYY2W012193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From dimi at lattica.com 2007-09-07 19:34 EST ------- I have just released version 1.0.2 that addresses (most of) the issues mentioned above (except for the -client package, as explained above): http://downloads.sourceforge.net/safekeep/safekeep-1.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 00:31:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 20:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080031.l880VnIO007061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-07 20:31 EST ------- Please do the review with f7-i386 while I work with upstream to get an F8 port. The main issues should be in the spec and once they are ironed out rev'ing the source should be straightforward (and necessary anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 00:35:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 20:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080035.l880ZZGl019981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-09-07 20:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) Okay I'll take a look at it tonite. For those of you playing along. I'm working as closely as possible with Dimi as the upstream developer to keep the fedora packaging in sync with the upstream. I'm still expecting to act as the maintainer for the Fedora packages, and the gate-keeper to the bits in Fedora cvs until Dimi gets Fedora contributor status and we can share maintainership duties in Fedora space for this package. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 01:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 21:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080159.l881xLqt016988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-07 21:59 EST ------- > * IMPORTANT: license is incorrect: you are licensing this as LGPL, but some > parts of this application are linking to Qt 3 (free edition), which is > licensed under the GPL; therefore this application must also be licensed as > GPL. This is incorrect. Just as kdelibs can be under the LGPL, this package can too. The guidelines explicitly say that the License field should indicate the license of the package itself, not the entire linked combination. Now, it is true that unless you have a commercial license for Qt, you cannot distribute the linked combination under anything other than the GPL. But this still doesn't mean the license of the package has to be declared as GPL in the RPM License tag, just as in the case of kdelibs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 02:08:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080208.l8828QcZ018233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 22:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > > * IMPORTANT: license is incorrect: you are licensing this as LGPL, but some > > parts of this application are linking to Qt 3 (free edition), which is > > licensed under the GPL; therefore this application must also be licensed as > > GPL. > > This is incorrect. Just as kdelibs can be under the LGPL, this package can too. ...... Please file a new bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 02:13:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080213.l882DktB030833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208034 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-07 22:13 EST ------- And note that 1.21.1. is surely licensed under GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 02:15:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281901] Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080215.l882FO8e031311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cheese - A webcam application for snapshots and movies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-07 22:15 EST ------- built in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 02:20:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080220.l882KhrI020142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 03:20:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 23:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080320.l883K5UX028403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-09-07 23:20 EST ------- Revision 3: SRPM: http://people.emich.edu/nboyle/flpsed-0.5.0-3.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.emich.edu/nboyle/flpsed.spec All previous suggestions have been implemented. (GPL+, Requires: ghostscript) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 05:22:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080522.l885MbAD020819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-08 01:22 EST ------- NOT A FORMAL REVIEW (i'm not a sponsor) * no source files * package meets naming and packaging guidelines (no special guideline for channels). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2). * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F7 - x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint : W: php-channel-phpdb no-documentation * final provides are sane: php-channel(pear.phpdb.org) = 1.0.0-3.fc8 php-channel-phpdb = 1.0.0-3.fc8 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear channel..) * no documentation No version for the .xml file, but i think using 1.0.0 is OK. No License but LGPLv2 seems OK as is the license of the package provided on this channel (could be "public domain"). Should : as the version has no meaning, you probably can ommit it in the virtual provides : php-channel(pear.phpdb.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 05:49:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080549.l885n2xx011609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 01:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Okay I'll take a look at it tonite. Then please assign the bug to you and set the fedora-review flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 05:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080547.l885l85Z011572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-08 01:47 EST ------- You must use BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 Because macro used for this spec are not defined in previous pear release. I will prefer R and BR on php-channel(pear.phpdb.org) rather then php-channel-phpdb. Ok, there is no guidelines yet, but i will propose this When i wrote don't use %{pear_phpdir}/*, i mean use %{pear_phpdir} but not * Probably ${pear_phpdir}/creole I can't build this RPM, don't understand why. "pear install" hangs. I will try later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 05:55:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 01:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080555.l885t1g7024039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 01:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > > Okay I'll take a look at it tonite. > > Then please assign the bug to you and set the fedora-review flag to "?". Forget this, I was confused and it is too early here. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:24:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080624.l886OAig027242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |283401 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-08 02:24 EST ------- It seems there is a bug in PEAR. Build ok with F7 pear 1.5.0 Build hangs with newer version (1.5.4, 1.6.1). This issue also affects php-pear-PHPUnit. See Bug #283401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:25:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080625.l886PMUO015925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 02:25 EST ------- - rpmlint: NEEDSWORK W: linuxdcpp rpm-buildroot-usage %build scons PREFIX=%{_prefix} FAKE_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT release=0 It seems you can skip FAKE_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %build, than rpmlint will be silent. I do not know scons, but SConstruct uses FAKE_ROOT only in its install section. - licenses: NEEDSWORK You used GPLv2 in License, but when I look in the source, nearly every file hast a GPLv2+ header. - naming: ok - license in %doc: ok - spec legible: ok - compiling:builds for all supported architectures:ok - BuildRequires: ok - locales: not used: ok - ldconfig: not needed: ok - directory ownage: ok, todo Please use %{_datadir}/linuxdcpp/ in %files to make it visible, that it is a directory - %clean, %install rm -rf: ok - BuildRoot: ok - no -devel or -static subpackage: ok TODO (by me): - Verify .desktop file I do not yet know, how to verify whether or not StartupNotify and/or StartupWMClass should be used. I have to do some research here. - Verify tarball creation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:29:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080629.l886Tw3V016049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 02:29 EST ------- Use download.sourceforge.net here: Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/libssh2/%{name}-%{version}-%{checkoutdate}.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080637.l886bluI028814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-08 02:37 EST ------- 0.12 is now out. The major changes are the legal fixes suggested by Karl Berry, file shuffling between texlive and texlive-fonts package and handful of other fixes. ChangeLog is here: * Thu Aug 30 2007 Jindrich Novy - 2007-0.12 - update description - BR ruby, don't obsolete tetex-tex4ht - remove license problematic/useless stuff, based on email from Karl Berry - move vfont.sample to doc - preserve timestamps - shuffle binaries between texlive and texlive-fonts, update scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:40:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080640.l886eQ9B029286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 02:40 EST ------- FE-NEW does not need to be blocked anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080639.l886dN2W028913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 02:39 EST ------- Chirs, you cannot review you own package, so you should not assign this package to you and set fedora-review to " ", otherwise no reviewer will find this review request. I did by accident, because I used the wrong query. ;-) Also I guess the FE-DEADREVIEW blocker should be removed and you should add yourself to CC. Or maybe you should open a new review request, to make you reporter of the review request, I am not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 06:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 02:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080648.l886mrjE018159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 02:48 EST ------- > For afio and buffer I can also provide packages for fedora if there is a need > indeed to provide them (I thought they were already part of the distro and > didn't check that indeed). Please do this. Also I did some changes in Bug 187317 blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR was missing, FE-REVIEW is not needed anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 07:21:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281281] Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080721.l887LMmg001354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281281 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 03:21 EST ------- - naming: ok (debian also uses a lowercase name) - rpmlint: ok (silent) - source: ok cc458a9154f6b8c6da9fae16627beec4 NetPIPE-3.7.1.tar.gz cc458a9154f6b8c6da9fae16627beec4 NetPIPE-3.7.1.tar.gz.1 - BuildRoot: ok - Package compiles in koji for all supported archs - License: NEEDSWORK You use GPLv2+, but I cannot find any information on the version of the license, the header in some source files only mention GPL, but no version and so does README. Also no license text is included. These files do not contain any license header, but some contain an author: shmem.c MP_memcpy.c mpi2.c gpshmem.c gm.c armci.c Would you please ask upstream to update the license header (and the manpage and README) to a specific GPL Version, add a license header to the mentioned files and include the license text in the tarball? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 07:25:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080725.l887PfTE001816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 03:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Sourceforge is sucking a lot right now, and won't let me download the sources > from anywhere. Hopefully that's only temporary. Do not use: Source: http://belnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gmyth/%{name}_%{version}.tar.gz Use: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}_%{version}.tar.gz It is in the Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 07:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080738.l887cgB4023665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 03:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > @Callum > About the snapshoot, it is often recommanded to use a bash script to retrieve > the sources (and remove CVS or .svn ), so you can have a method to compare The Guidelines demand a documented way how to create a snapshot tarball: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 And a hint for svn: You can use "svn export" instead of "svn co" to avoid the creation of .svn directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 07:44:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 03:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234753] Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080744.l887iDtc024253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234753 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 03:44 EST ------- - You should explain why you disable the debug package in the spec. - GPL is not a valid value for License: anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 08:00:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 04:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080800.l88807Lm026398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 04:00 EST ------- - version 2.0.10 is now released - License should be GPLv2 not GPL - Source0: should be http://download.sourceforge.net/hte/ht-%{version}.tar.bz2 TexLive seems not to obolete tetex-tex4ht | - BR ruby, don't obsolete tetex-tex4ht Source: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/SPECS/texlive.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 08:36:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 04:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080836.l888aFja031487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-09-08 04:36 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OK: rpmlint is silent OK: package naming OK: spec name OK: zlib license OK: license field matches license OK: spec files English OK: spec is legible OK: source matches upstream: 8065eebe5a2b163e43b40461bfe49a56 radeontool-1.5.tar.gz 8065eebe5a2b163e43b40461bfe49a56 rpmbuild/SOURCES/radeontool-1.5.tar.gz OK: build checked and worked fine on f7/i386 OK: BR are fine OK: no duplicate files OK: file permissions are correct OK: clean section OK: macro usage OK: content is ok OK: %doc does not affect runtime OK: %install section The package 2dad2d98dcb108a82a95b9201f80daf9 radeontool-1.5-2.fc7.src.rpm is hereby approved. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG4l5aQEQyPsWM8csRAialAKC8nogyYGA1BRykwi77+OjjZEfJegCeIpmL f1xzDptULMJVaWUPz2vLKBs= =9NQm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- It would be nice that before building it you add the '-p' flag to the install argument to preserve the timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 08:48:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 04:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709080848.l888mSip032766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2007-09-08 04:48 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OK: rpmlint is silent OK: package name OK: spec name OK: package OK: license GPLv2 OK: license field matches license OK: license is included in %doc OK: spec file English OK: spec is legible OK: sources match upstream sources 1756f2e71ceaef217220e8e482fce835 vbetool_0.7-1.tar.gz 1756f2e71ceaef217220e8e482fce835 rpmbuild/SOURCES/vbetool_0.7-1.tar.gz OK: builds fine on f7/i386 OK: exclude arche OK: BR OK: no duplicate files in %files OK: permissions OK: %clean section OK: macros OK: content OK: %doc does not affect runtime OK: %install section The package 0f88a30ed64ab5fcdf399021626f7933 vbetool-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm is hereby approved. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG4mG5QEQyPsWM8csRAlB0AKCFGx7/OhU9jHYFUVS03xdzlBSVvgCcDi6P 5RR/GduSQHVpxbJxZlQjZUc= =/A80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 09:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 05:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] New: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava-0.9.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: sdljava is a Java binding to the SDL API being developed by Ivan Ganza. sdljava provides the ability to write games and other applications from the java programming language. sdljava is designed to be fast, efficient and easy to use. Finally we can start to write games in java without needing to learn yet another slow complicated API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:00:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081000.l88A0YtO021290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-08 06:00 EST ------- I don't think the last sentence of %description ("Finally ...") adds any value in the package. On the contrary, actually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081001.l88A1aIS021456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 06:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vbetool Short Description: Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Owners: till,pknirsch Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: no If it is possible for you, please also add ajax to watchcommits and commit for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:03:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081003.l88A3ehF009960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 06:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pm-utils Updated Description: Power management utilities and scripts for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081008.l88A8hM5022223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 06:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: radeontool Short Description: Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Owners: till,pknirsch Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: no If it is possible for you, please also add ajax to watchcommits and commit for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081018.l88AIWCa011565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 06:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't think the last sentence of %description ("Finally ...") adds any value > in the package. On the contrary, actually. That comes from the packman (suse addon repo) specfile I based my work on and I guess they took it from an upstream description, I agree with you and I'll remove it in the next iteration or before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:51:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081051.l88ApImT015257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-08 06:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-web-photo Short Description: HTML pages thumbnailer Owners: hadess Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 10:53:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 06:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081053.l88ArqaR015330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-08 06:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > rpmlint output: > > [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint > /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/gmyth-*.rpm > gmyth.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gmyth-0.4/NEWS > gmyth.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gmyth-0.4/README > > should just remove those Done. > gmyth-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/gmyth/src/gmyth_monitor_handler.h > > these should probably be fixed Done. (In reply to comment #7) > license: COPYING is GPL, sources say LGPL - what gives ? > should seek upstream clarification It's LGPL, the sources and the project page say LGPL. I filed a bug upstream: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1790620&group_id=177106&atid=879914 and mentioned it in the package > upstream sources: not verified, see above Fixed, thanks Till. http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gmyth/gmyth.spec http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gmyth/gmyth-0.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 11:39:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 07:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] New: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool-0.6.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: QPxTool is the linux way to get full control over your CD/DVD drives. It is the Open Source Solution which intends to give you access to all available Quality Checks (Q-Checks) on written and blank media, that are available for your drive. This will help you to find the right media and the optimized writing speed for your hardware, which will increase the chance for a long data lifetime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 11:59:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 07:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283471] New: Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283471 Summary: Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/umbrello.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/umbrello-1.5.71-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Umbrello UML Modeller is a Unified Modelling Language diagram programm for KDE. UML allows you to create diagrams of software and other systems in a standard format. --- rpmlint says: W: umbrello dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/umbrello/common ../common The target is in kdelibs (which umbrello requires) W: umbrello devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/apps/umbrello/headings/heading.h E: umbrello non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/umbrello/headings/heading.rb 0644 E: umbrello non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/umbrello/headings/heading.py 0644 These 3 files are used for the diagram to code convertor, so the rpmlint warnings / errors are bogus in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:04:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081204.l88C4qeg023116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 08:04 EST ------- I'll review this, Jon could you review umbrello in return please? The umbrello review is bug 283471. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:20:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283471] Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081220.l88CKmTh025524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283471 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-09-08 08:20 EST ------- umbrello is already in kdesdk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:30:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081230.l88CUIN8026628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 08:30 EST ------- Another issues: - provide a full URL in Source0 to get the tarball or include a comment how to generate the tarball - do not use /usr but %{_prefix} - %files needs a defattr line - use %{_libdir} and %{_datadir} in %files - is ROOT=%{buildroot} in %build really needed? - consider using disttag Please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros (it's about %{_libdir} and other macros) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines (defattr) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7 (disttag) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL (about the URL in Source0) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081238.l88CcQWK006330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 08:38 EST ------- Bert, you are not yet sponsored according to the Fedora Account System, please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored In case that OLPC packge maintainers do not need to be sponsored, please tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081237.l88CbFJ3006264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 08:37 EST ------- Bert, you are not yet sponsored according to the Fedora Account System, please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored In case there OLPC contributors do not need to be sponsored, please tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081243.l88ChQjQ027833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-08 08:43 EST ------- Okay. * This package is okay (can be rebuilt, installed, and seem to work well) * Your pre-review looks good (for a brief check) =========================================================== This package (flpsed) is APPROVED by me =========================================================== Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081245.l88CjqL1028357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 08:45 EST ------- Fully reviewed. Must Fix: --------- * Add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" for dir ownership Should Fix: ----------- * run "convert xsc.png -transparent white out.png" and then replace xsc.png with out.png to make the icon transparent (much nicer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:49:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186632] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081249.l88CnkU0007627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186632 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-08 08:49 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: svn2cl New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 12:49:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081249.l88CnWfn028545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 08:49 EST ------- Sebastian, the Fedora Account System does not know your e-mail address, therefore I assume you are not already a package maintainer in Fedora and therefore need to be sponsored. Please read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:00:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283471] Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081300.l88D0QJZ009339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283471 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 09:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > umbrello is already in kdesdk. What? Ah yes that makes perfect sense very logical place for it to be, especially as its in its own subpackage with umbrello in the name, or atleast has a provides umbrello so that "yum install umbrello" works, oh wait it doesn't have either of those, GRRRR. See bug 283521 for me ranting some more about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:05:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237422] Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081305.l88D5sXX010063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluedj - An online game centre https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237422 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:05 EST ------- - You use spaces and tabs in the spec, please only use one of them. It seems to be easier to substitute the tabs with spaces, because there are less tab than space charachters. - When you do not build a -data package, then please remove the comments about it from the spec - Can you maybe provide a patch to create an install target with qmake to simplify the %install section - GPL is not a valid license tag value anymore: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:22:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081322.l88DMNHT012127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:22 EST ------- This is not a valid value for the License Tag: License: GPL/BSD See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 This is afaik not needed: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig Because this already creates the Requires: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig I am not sure, is the -static subpackage useful without the -devel package? If not, then the -static package should depend on the -devel package and not on the main package. %install must begin with "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" This %{_includedir}/infiniband/*.h should be %{_includedir}/infiniband/ to include the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246388] Review Request: libibmad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081330.l88DUOf6001681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibmad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246388 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:30 EST ------- Same issues as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246387#c10 (the last issue can be ignored here) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:36:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246390] Review Request: opensm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081336.l88DaBFK013950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opensm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246390 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:36 EST ------- There is no spec/srpm for this at http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246388] Review Request: libibmad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081334.l88DYJUZ013399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibmad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246388 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|246389 | nThis| | BugsThisDependsOn| |246389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081334.l88DYJu8013424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |246389 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:34:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246389] Review Request: libibumad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081334.l88DYHZE013375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibumad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246389 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|246388 |246387 OtherBugsDependingO| |246388 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:34 EST ------- Same issues as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246387#c10 (the last issue can be ignored here) also fixing part of the dependency tree, according to the spec the dependencies are libibcommon <- libibumad <- libibmad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:37:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246391] Review Request: infiniband-diags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081337.l88DbuUs002346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: infiniband-diags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246391 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:37 EST ------- There is no spec or rpm available at http://www.xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:40:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246388] Review Request: libibmad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081340.l88DeObA002922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibmad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246388 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|246387 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:40:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246387] Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081340.l88DeOrg002898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libibcommon - OpenFabrics Alliance InfiniBand management common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246387 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|246388 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:53:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:53:13 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-f?= =?iso-8859-1?q?onts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081353.l88DrD7O004244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 09:53 EST ------- These files should be prefixed with the package name: Source2: OFL.txt Source3: OFL-fr.txt Imho you should add a Provides: ecolier-fonts = %{version}-%{releae} to make it easier to install the fonts. The %changelog entry uses strange characters instead of "-". The License Page uses http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web as a reference to the OFL License. (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-19fc3ef10add085a28cb06784dc34ef8b05a9bd6-4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 13:50:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] New: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank-3.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: HomeBank is the free software you have always wanted to manage your personal accounts at home. The main concept is to be light, simple and very easy to use. It brings you many features that allows you to analyze your finances in a detailed way instantly and dynamically with powerful report tools based on filtering and graphical charts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081425.l88EPhxA019706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-08 10:25 EST ------- Addressed. I'll get on ubrello very, very, soon. :) Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xsc/xsc.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/xsc/xsc-1.5-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081443.l88EhNX6021521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From nsboyle at gmail.com 2007-09-08 10:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flpsed Short Description: WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor Owners: nboyle Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:39:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081439.l88EdZEG020965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 10:39 EST ------- Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:43:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081443.l88EhBNm021482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 10:43 EST ------- License should be GFDL according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-19fc3ef10add085a28cb06784dc34ef8b05a9bd6-2 and index.html You use tabs and spaces in the spec, e.g. in Group you align with spaces but in URL you align with tabs. Please use either tabs or spaces. I did not try it but I guess you can simplify the spec when you use in %prep %setup -q -n manual-en dos2unix qtiplot.adp and in %files %doc * Then you can remove mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name} tar -xjf %{SOURCE0} -C $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name} dos2unix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}/manual-en/qtiplot.adp from %install. In %files a %defattr(-,root,root,-) before the %doc is missing. According to http://soft.proindependent.com/manuals.html the documentation is version 0.8.9 Imho you should skip the %{?dist} tag in Release and ask rel-eng everytime you built a package to sync it to all Fedora releases, this will also avoid updating the manual everytime one updrades the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:47:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081447.l88ElRD3022088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 10:47 EST ------- I forgot: run dos2unix with --keepdate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:54:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081454.l88EsMei010831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-08 10:54 EST ------- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xsc Short Description: A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle Owners: limb at jcomserv.net Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 14:59:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 10:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081459.l88Ex8q5023223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 15:28:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 11:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081528.l88FSbRD026474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-08 11:28 EST ------- rpmlint is clean on RPM, but on SRPM: ksirk.src:35: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}_*.la A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. ksirk.src:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}_*.so A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. This should probably be patched, should it not? Also, I see shared libs, but no ldconfig in post or postun. Running a mock build to double-check BRs, but it otherwise looks great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 15:46:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 11:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081546.l88FkEiJ028619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 11:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint is clean on RPM, but on SRPM: > > ksirk.src:35: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}_*.la > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, > /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. > > ksirk.src:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}_*.so > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, > /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. > These get caused by these lines in the spec: rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}_*.la # these are unversioned libs, which are only used by ksirk itself mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name} mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}_*.so \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name} Which move the lib from /usr/lib (wrong on 64 bit) to %{_libdir}/%{name}, so the lines causing the warning actually fix the issue reported by rpmlint :) Without these lines rpmlint won't complain and the result will be wrong. > Also, I see shared libs, but no ldconfig in post or postun. > Correct, the .so files are only for ksirk and are unversioned, thus they get installed in %{_libdir}/%{name} not just %{_libdir}. So ldconfig is not needed (and would have no effect as it doesn't look in %{_libdir}/%{name} only in %{_libdir} ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:06:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281281] Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081606.l88G6OXE030856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281281 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-08 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Would you please ask upstream to update the license header (and the manpage and > README) to a specific GPL Version, Upstream does not have to change the license to version specific. If no specific version is provided, the license is simply GPL+ (GPL any version). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:15:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081615.l88GFCuB019964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-08 12:15 EST ------- * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=152384&name=build.log So the created debuginfo rpm is incomplete * Categories "Application X-Fedora" in fedora-linuxdcpp.desktop are deprecated and should be removed. * rpmlint: linuxdcpp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/linuxdcpp-0/Changelog.txt linuxdcpp.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/linuxdcpp-0/Credits.txt Encoding should be UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:24:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081624.l88GOnME032594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-08 12:24 EST ------- The simple setup will not work.:( So I must use complex one. So here the next try.(I have correct the version number of the doc) SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-doc-0.8.9-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-doc.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:26:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081626.l88GQ3pV000520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-08 12:26 EST ------- libflaim.pc contains the line: ---------------------------------------------------- Libs: -lpthread -lrt -lstdc++ -ldl -lncurses -lflaim -L${libdir} ---------------------------------------------------- "-lncurses" means that libflaim-devel should have "Requires: ncurses-devel". But make check if "-lncurses" is really needed. For libflaim.so the linkage against libncurses.so MUST be done in advance and "-lncurses" is usually not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:26:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081626.l88GQmSj021201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-08 12:26 EST ------- Ok, that makes sense. My mock build revealed a missing BR, gettext. Add that and you're set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:54:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081654.l88GsXTL003629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 16:57:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 12:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081657.l88GvDZG004150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-08 12:57 EST ------- I am the tetex-tex4ht maintainer, and indeed using ht as a program name is not a good idea. tetex-tex4ht in fact contains many executables, some with trivial names, I'll try to talk to upstream. In the mean time I don't know exactly what could be done. In debian tex4ht there are much less programs, but still ht. This is also true for ht, upstream should try to find a more descriptive name. The %{_bindir} namespace has to be shared among all the applications, more care should be taken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 17:03:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081703.l88H3vcO004939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-09-08 13:03 EST ------- Hey, I noticed these were branched for F7, I gave it a whirl and compiled your SRPM for F7 and it seems to work. Are there plans to build this for FC-6/F7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 17:06:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:06:14 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081706.l88H6Esk005509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-09-08 13:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I also note that the .ttf files are just named "ec*.ttf" > and it is hard for many people in the world to type "?" > without changing xkb layout, installing a input method, or having > to cut and paste the letter (like I just did). I've added a provides for accented-less name If you browse the website you'll see the actual project name takes an accent The font filenames are infortunate and could use a refresh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 17:04:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:04:04 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081704.l88H44xs025183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ?colier- |Review Request: ?colier- |fonts - ?colier court fonts|court-fonts - ?colier court | |fonts ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-09-08 13:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > These files should be prefixed with the package name: > Source2: OFL.txt This is SIL's filename, won't touch it we do not rename downloadable sources > Source3: OFL-fr.txt OK > Imho you should add a > Provides: ecolier-fonts = %{version}-%{releae} > to make it easier to install the fonts. This is a nice idea - done > The %changelog entry uses strange characters instead of "-". Changelog is freeform, changelog parsers need to grok utf-8 to get author names right, and other fedora packages do it too so I don't see the problem. It made the infra team laugh the first time > The License Page uses http://scripts.sil.org/OFL_web as a reference to the OFL > License. And on this page you have a link to the FAQ that includes the download link to the standalone text version. (with an unfortunate URL - SIL's site sucks a bit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 17:37:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253749] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081737.l88HbYOX029156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253749 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-08 13:37 EST ------- will start review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 17:53:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081753.l88HrT6X010679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 13:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, that makes sense. My mock build revealed a missing BR, gettext. Add that > and you're set. Thanks! Here is a new version with the missing BR added: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ksirk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ksirk-1.7-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 18:04:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 14:04:34 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081804.l88I4Y6q011901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-08 14:04 EST ------- I think using the '?' in the actual package name is just asking for trouble, and that it would be better to use plain 'e' there and '?' in the Provides if you insist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 18:20:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 14:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081820.l88IKSc5013987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-08 14:20 EST ------- Superlative. Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 18:50:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 14:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081850.l88IoSHi005751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-08 14:50 EST ------- I am also a fedora ambassador [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SubhodipBiswas] please see here for ambassador list.I represent India /West Bengal/Durgapur [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/CountryList#head-593f83e9f2d1329dd3e42c3350d837ace96ad052] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 19:03:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081903.l88J3d5w007051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 15:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ksirk Short Description: Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 19:03:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081903.l88J3xJa019412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 19:14:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249831] Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081914.l88JEvAX020577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249831 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-08 15:14 EST ------- Let's roll... MUST items: * rpmlint must be run on every package FAILL $ rpmlint gromacs-3.3.1-2.fc7.src.rpm W: gromacs invalid-license GPL $ rpmlint gromacs-3.3.1-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/GMXRC.csh E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/GMXRC.bash E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/GMXRC E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/completion.bash E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/completion.csh E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/GMXRC.zsh E: gromacs script-without-shebang /usr/bin/completion.zsh W: gromacs invalid-license GPL $ rpmlint gromacs-debuginfo-3.3.1-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: gromacs-debuginfo invalid-license GPL $ rpmlint gromacs-devel-3.3.1-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: gromacs-devel no-documentation W: gromacs-devel invalid-license GPL $ rpmlint gromacs-mpi-3.3.1-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: gromacs-mpi no-documentation W: gromacs-mpi invalid-license GPL $ rpmlint gromacs-mpi-devel-3.3.1-2.fc7.x86_64.rpm W: gromacs-mpi-devel no-documentation W: gromacs-mpi-devel invalid-license GPL E: gromacs-mpi-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libgmxana_mpi.so E: gromacs-mpi-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libmd_mpi.so E: gromacs-mpi-devel no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libgmx_mpi.so There are several problems here. First, GPL is no a valid tag anymore, please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines to find your appropriated license tag. Files like /usr/bin/GMXRC.csh seems to me initialization scripts. A better place for them is perhaps /etc/profile.d completion.* is too generic. Could you rename to something like gromacs-completion.* or something like that? And /usr/lib64/libmd_mpi.so and the others are binary files instead of symlinks. Try using cp -a instead of cp -p * The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK * The spec file name must match the base package %{name}... OK * The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK * The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license... FAIL (See above) * The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. SKIPPED First fix previous point * Include license if the license text is included OK * The spec file must be written in American English OK * The spec file for the package MUST be legible FAIL Please add some comments on the specfile detailing the compilation with/without MPI enabled. In the description of the mpi packages it would be polite to explain the acronym to those who might come across the package. Something like "Build of the GROMACS package with MPI (Message Passing Interface) enabled". * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source FAIL The url of the source doesn't exit, please fix the SOURCE tag in the specfile * The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms OK * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK * The spec file must handle locales properly. OK (no locales) * Package with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK * If the package is designed to be relocatable... OK (not relocatable) * A package must own all directories that it creates OK * A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK * Permissions on files must be set properly. OK * Each package must have a %clean section OK * Each package must consistently use macros OK * The package must contain code, or permissible content OK * Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK The html files are only 1.9 M * Files in %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. OK The bulk of your docs is in /usr/share/gromacs/html. Is there any reason to put the files here and not in /usr/share/doc (marking the files in html as %doc)? * Header files in -devel OK * Static libraries must be in a -static OK (no static libs) * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK (no pkconfig) * Library files that end in .so (if a link to sufixed lib) must go in a -devel package. OK * Devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK * Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file FAIL Your package contains GUI applications (e.g highway). If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Either way, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK * At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK * All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD Items: * If License text not included query upstream to include it OK * Summary and description translated for supported Non-English languages NO * The package builds in mock OK * The package should build for supported archs Builds at least for x86_64 * The reviewer should test that the package functions: Seems to work, I'm not an expert... * If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 19:15:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249831] Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081915.l88JFnx0008829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gromacs - Molecular dynamics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249831 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 19:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709081932.l88JWKWg022666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-08 15:32 EST ------- Whoops: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xsc Short Description: A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle Owners: limb Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 20:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 16:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283701] New: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283701 Summary: Review Request: vecmath1.2 - Free version of vecmath from the Java3D 1.2 specification Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vecmath1.2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/vecmath1.2-1.14-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is an unofficial implementation (java source code) of the javax.vecmath package specified in the Java(TM) 3D API 1.2 . The package includes classes for 3-space vector/point, 4-space vector, 4x4, 3x3 matrix, quaternion, axis-angle combination and etc. which are often utilized for computer graphics mathematics. Most of the classes have single and double precision versions. Generic matrices' LU and SV decomposition are also there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 20:06:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 16:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283711] New: Review Request: bolzplatz2006-data - Datafiles for bolzplatz2006 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283711 Summary: Review Request: bolzplatz2006-data - Datafiles for bolzplatz2006 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/bolzplatz2006-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/bolzplatz2006-data-1.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Datafiles for bolzplatz2006. --- Note these files as is are licensed CC By-Nc-Sa, IOW they are not acceptable for inclusion into Fedora. I've contacted upstream and the project lead is willing to drop the Nc clause. He is currently contacting the other (data creating) project members to ask there permission for the license change. He expects this to be no problem, but this takes a bit of time. I'm already submitting this as its needed for bolzplatz2006 itself (which is GPLv2+), and that is going to be a long review I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 20:10:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 16:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283721] New: Review Request: bolzplatz2006 - Slam Soccer 2006 is a funny football game in 3D-comic-style Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283721 Summary: Review Request: bolzplatz2006 - Slam Soccer 2006 is a funny football game in 3D-comic-style Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/bolzplatz2006.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/bolzplatz2006-1.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Slam Soccer 2006 is a funny football game in 3D-comic-style - and it's for free! * Freeware and open source * Funny 3d-comic-style * Enthralling stadium atmosphere * Keyboard and gamepad control * 2-player mode * Career and world cup * Register in the online hall of fame * Build your own stadium * 80 teams * 20 stadiums * 10 weather conditions * 50 adboards * 10 referees * 9 commentators (5 German, 2 English, 2 French) * 3 languages: German, English, French --- Notice this packages only works with icedtea, and thus only works on devel/rawhide ! It needs the following packages which are still under review: sdljava - bug 283441 vecmath - bug 283701 bolzplatz2006-data - bug 283711 --- Note the datafiles as is are licensed CC By-Nc-Sa, IOW they are not acceptable for inclusion into Fedora as is. I've contacted upstream and the project lead is willing to drop the Nc clause. He is currently contacting the other (data creating) project members to ask there permission for the license change. He expects this to be no problem, but this takes a bit of time. I'm already submitting bolzplatz2006 itself (which is GPLv2+) as this might be a long review I think (it took me almost a week to package it). And in order to be able to test bolzplatz itself I've also made the datafiles package available already, see bug 283711. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 20:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 16:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283711] Review Request: bolzplatz2006-data - Datafiles for bolzplatz2006 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082022.l88KMG05028368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bolzplatz2006-data - Datafiles for bolzplatz2006 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283711 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-08 16:22 EST ------- Note bolzplatz2006's review is bug 283721. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 21:31:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:31:22 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082131.l88LVMwX003459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-09-08 17:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I think using the '?' in the actual package name is just asking for trouble, 1. It is somewhat asking for trouble but our infrastructure needs to get utf-8 proof and I'd rather it was done with a small package like this than in an urgent way when a bigger package lands. There is really an astonishing few problems revealed by this package, and it's a pity to stop just >< this close to full support 2. your know how we French are, we care about our language Anyway here's the updated srpm http://nim.fedorapeople.org/%c3%a9colier-court-fonts-1.00-0.2.20070628.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 21:48:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 17:48:52 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082148.l88Lmqot005277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 17:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > The %changelog entry uses strange characters instead of "-". > > Changelog is freeform, changelog parsers need to grok utf-8 to get author names > right, and other fedora packages do it too so I don't see the problem. It made > the infra team laugh the first time The Guidelines demand the "-": http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 | You must use one of the following formats: I do not know enough about rpm to decide, whether your format will cause trouble or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 22:43:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 18:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283471] Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082243.l88Mhwor031439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: umbrello - Unified Modelling Language (UML) diagrams modeller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283471 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-08 18:43 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 283521 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 23:19:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241553] Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082319.l88NJqDu015182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: safekeep - simple, centralized configuration for rdiff-backup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241553 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2007-09-08 19:19 EST ------- Okay, updated urls for the spec and srpm being submitted for review. Essentially the same as Dimi's upstream spec from comment 15. Spec: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/safekeep.spec SRPM: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/safekeep-1.0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm F-7 noarch RPMS: http://jspaleta.thecodergeek.com/Fedora%20SRPMS/safekeep/1.0.2-1/F7/ All remaining rpmlint errors are the result of using the /var/lib/safekeep directory as the home directory for the safekeep user and including a .ssh sub-directory for ssh keys. As previously discussed in earlier comments, these errors are erroneous for this atypical but appropriate usage of /var/lib/safekeep as a home directory. The client package is still essentially a metapackage due to the difference in the server and client dependency chain. Though as upstream has mentioned, there are plans to add additional client package payload so keeping it as a separate sub-package package now keeps from having to complicate things later as more client-side development is added. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 23:27:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082327.l88NRe21016235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Summary|Review Request: qpxtool - |Review Request: qpxtool - |CD/DVD Quality check tool |CD/DVD Quality check tool ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 19:27 EST ------- Use: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 for -devel subpackge: Requires: %{name} = %{version} should be Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} %files devel is missing a %defattr(-,root,root,-) the cp invocations should be used with "-p" to preserve the timestamp. The Makefile also defines INCDIR (%{_includedir}), which you do not adjust with sed. the manpage is not installed with a preserved timestamp, missing "-p" in the install invocation in man/Makefile (line 10), maybe upstream would change this. In case you did not know: you should be able to use make install PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} ... instead of the sed magic. Also you can use all sed expressions at once: sed -i -e 's!/usr/local!%{_prefix}!g' \ -e 's!\$(PREFIX)/bin!%{_sbindir}!g' \ -e 's!\$(PREFIX)/lib!%{_libdir}!g' \ -e 's!\$(PREFIX)/man!%{_mandir}!g' Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 8 23:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709082337.l88NbMIW017317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-08 19:37 EST ------- Please use: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 Unuseful comments should be removed: #Requires: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 00:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 20:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090008.l8908F0Q008133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-09-08 20:08 EST ------- spec file: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb.spec SRPM: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb-2.35-6.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 04:32:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 00:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090432.l894W98x004013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-09 00:32 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm This is the new pair of Spec & SRPM for PIDA 0.5.1. Rpmlint generates a bunch of errors complaining about empty service.pida files and "wrong end of line encoding" in one of the documentation files. While I am not sure how the empty files are important, I am unable to locate the problem spot which causes the "wrong end of line encoding" error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 05:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 01:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090521.l895LXBc009901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat.com 2007-09-09 01:21 EST ------- Hi. Sorry I've been ignoring this once again :( I think it would be fine for Jonathan to be the primary packager. I looked at the newest spec file and I read through the Emacs packaging draft. Looking good! Going back to the bbdb-autoloads.el question -- I think the reason that this is in site-start.d is so that the autoloads will be evaluated at Emacs startup (see site-lisp/site-start.el). This means that the user doesn't have to add an explicit require or anything to their .emacs to start using BBDB. I was wrong about this back in comment #10. (FWIW this is mentioned in the packaging guidelines.) In my copy of the latest RPM, bbdb-autoloads.el ends up in site-lisp/bbdb/. So, I think it should be moved again. BTW ... BBDB and VM requiring each other seems pretty ugly! Perhaps one or the other could be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 06:15:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 02:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090615.l896FhRq028209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-09 02:15 EST ------- First look at this review : Have a look to lastest PECL Guidelines (approved but not yet inline) : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP You should note : - API check : php(zend-abi) - Register the extension You could have a look, in rawhide, to php-pecl-phar or php-pecl-memcache recent package. AS package name is svn, you must use php-pecl-svn (lowercase) No need to "strip" library, this is done by rpmbuild (need for -debuginfo subpackage) No Need for the License file (Guidelines says If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc) You should also note that : - this is a "beta" version - no update since 2006/03 - 13 open bugs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 06:16:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 02:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090616.l896GpIS015960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 02:16 EST ------- (I only checked your comment) (In reply to comment #12) > I am unable to locate the problem spot which causes the > "wrong end of line encoding" error. ------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint -I wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding : This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. ------------------------------------------------------ Try: sed -i -e 's|\r||' docs/html/handbook.html or dos2unix docs/html/handbook.html (for this method BuildRequires: dos2unix is needed) Note: 0.5.1-1 could not be rebuilt. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=152935 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 07:18:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 03:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090718.l897InmD022372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-09 03:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Use: > Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 ok > > for -devel subpackge: > Requires: %{name} = %{version} > should be > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ok > > %files devel is missing a %defattr(-,root,root,-) ok > > the cp invocations should be used with "-p" to preserve the timestamp. > > > The Makefile also defines INCDIR (%{_includedir}), which you do not adjust with sed. ok > > the manpage is not installed with a preserved timestamp, missing "-p" in the > install invocation in man/Makefile (line 10), maybe upstream would change this. ok fixed with a small patch for now. > > In case you did not know: > you should be able to use make install PREFIX=%{_prefix} LIBDIR=%{_libdir} ... > instead of the sed magic. I know but this would be a long "make line" so I preferd doing it this way. > Also you can use all sed expressions at once: > sed -i -e 's!/usr/local!%{_prefix}!g' \ > -e 's!\$(PREFIX)/bin!%{_sbindir}!g' \ > -e 's!\$(PREFIX)/lib!%{_libdir}!g' \ > -e 's!\$(PREFIX)/man!%{_mandir}!g' Makefile same here I think that this is easier to read New fixed package: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool-0.6.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 07:25:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 03:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090725.l897P0FX023026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 03:24 EST ------- *** Bug 226409 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 07:24:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 03:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226409] Merge Review: setools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090724.l897Oxbb022994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: setools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226409 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 03:24 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 280541 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 07:30:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 03:30:26 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090730.l897UQZo024032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-09-09 03:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > The Guidelines demand the "-": I'm not so sure if they demand the - or ask to normalize the first line of each changelog entry (and normalize is a big word as there are 3 different possible formats anyway) Didn't see this entry before, I'll change the format if you really insist (and re-change it later) > | You must use one of the following formats: > > I do not know enough about rpm to decide, whether your format will cause > trouble or not. It won't because there are already other packages that use this format, and went through mock plague kiji bodhi without anyone objecting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 08:29:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 04:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090829.l898TBmY026894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-09 04:29 EST ------- I have a working sunbird RPM here : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird-0.5-1.fc7.src.rpm I've made it by looking at how Novell and Mandriva do it. In my opinion, the "make install" is broken at the moment and tries to compile things that shouldn't be, which causes the error. Novell uses an included tool to build a directory with all the needed files in the sources dir, and then copies it in the buildroot. I've used the same method, it seems to work fine. Please have a look. Kelly, how about co-maintaining sunbird ? Since it's a pretty large project, two people will not be too many to handle the bug reports I believe... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 08:37:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 04:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090837.l898bov4007517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 04:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=190961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=190961&action=view) gdb log of straw on rawhide Well, even if you are a ambassador, you still have to be sponsored to get the proper right to access Fedora CVS. For 0.27-1: * BuildRequires - At least "BuildRequires: python-devel" is missing (Note: I first fixed the typo "%{__python)" to try rebuilding) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=152954 - Even after I add "BuildRequires: python-devel" the rebuild still fails like: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=152956 Please check the BuildRequires so as to be rebuilt in mock. Note: check setup.py ------------------------------------------------------------- 33 if sys.version < strawenv['PYTHON']: 47 try: 48 import pygtk 49 pygtk.require('2.0') 50 imp.find_module('gtk') 51 import gtk 52 if gtk.pygtk_version < strawenv['PYGTK']: 72 mod_list = [ 73 ('gnome', 'python-gnome2', 0), 74 ('gtkhtml2', "python-gnome2-extras", 0), 75 ('gconf', "python-gnome2", 1), 76 ('bsddb.db', 'python-bsddb', 0), 77 ('dbus', 'python-dbus', 0)] ----------------------------------------------------------- * Requires - Please check the dependency for straw correctly. * For example, straw/strawdbus.py comtails the line "import dbus", which means this package should have "Requires: dbus-python" * Some other dependencies are also missing * Here you can again check what "setup.py" requires. - Why does this need "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme"? * desktop vendor prefix - This is not rpmforge... Change to fedora. * GConf scriptlets - Please refer to the section "GConf" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * License - License is actually GPLv2+ as the source codes actually say so. * Runtime problem - This package cannot be launched on rawhide. gdb log attached (Maybe this is due to python-adns) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 08:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 04:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090845.l898jXvu008486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvokal at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 04:45 EST ------- Radek, would you look at the gdb output attached on comment 4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 09:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090902.l8992DnV010495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-09 05:02 EST ------- you should close this bug, as the package is already built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 09:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281281] Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090900.l8990PVt010294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281281 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2007-09-09 05:00 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru and Till. I've changed the license tag to GPL+ New version here: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/netpipe-3.7.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 09:08:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090908.l8998EsY011231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-09 05:08 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 09:06:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090906.l8996kTZ011170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 09:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249524] Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709090906.l8996F3S011129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wxdfast - Multi-threaded download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249524 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-09 05:06 EST ------- sorry was waiting for the update push to be able to build it for fc6 then I forgot to close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 09:54:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] New: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real- time strategy game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/boswars.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/boswars-2.4.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game. It is possible to play against human opponents over LAN, internet, or against the computer. Bos Wars aims to create a completly original and fun open source RTS game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 10:24:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 06:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091024.l89AOLt7019855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-09 06:24 EST ------- Fixed, Spec : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform.spec SRPM : http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 10:35:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 06:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091035.l89AZxtP021317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-09 06:35 EST ------- For the record, Xavier has excluded PPC64, because it can't be built under that arch. Upstream has been notified and they are working on it. =============================== This package is approved by ME. =============================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 10:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 06:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091041.l89AfZ3P009844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-09 06:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guile-gnome-platform Short Description: Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: cvsextras commit: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 11:00:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251020] Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091100.l89B0PH8024080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflaim - Flaim Database Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251020 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-09 07:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > libflaim.pc contains the line: > ---------------------------------------------------- > Libs: -lpthread -lrt -lstdc++ -ldl -lncurses -lflaim -L${libdir} > ---------------------------------------------------- > "-lncurses" means that libflaim-devel should have "Requires: ncurses-devel". > > But make check if "-lncurses" is really needed. For libflaim.so > the linkage against libncurses.so MUST be done in advance and > "-lncurses" is usually not needed. Thanks for the additional info Mamoru. I'll add this on the next build. Buildsys seems to be having problems at the moment. :( Closing now as per package process - thanks everyone. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 11:12:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091112.l89BCYk2025487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ch.nolte at noltec.org ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-09 07:12 EST ------- *** Bug 187828 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 11:12:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187828] Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091112.l89BCYRN025459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2007-09-09 07:12 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 283951 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 11:11:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283951] New: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: snecklifter at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net.spec SRPM URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: log4net is a tool to help the programmer output log statements to a variety of output targets. log4net is a port of the excellent log4j framework to the .NET runtime Comments: - This is a mono package and find-debuginfo.sh is failing to generate the requisite package, though I understand this is somewhat commonplace. - Nant is used to build the package with Strong Name signing. - Rpmlint is quiet on source, no doc error on devel and complains about no binary in binary rpm. I understand the latter is also not a blocker as this occurs with mono packages. I am already the maintainer of a couple of other packages and log4net forms part of around 4-5 which require iFolder to work on Fedora. This is a new review request opened as a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187828 Comments appreciated. Cheers Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 11:37:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091137.l89BbSvp028276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gauret at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-09 07:37 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source hedgewars-src-0.9.0.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list of hedgewars looks strange : data files are in "/usr/share/hedgewars/hedgewars", isn't that one "hedgewars" too many ? * The Icon tag in the desktop file should either use the full path or not include the file's extension (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Please see to that, otherwise the package looks fine (the game is very similar to wormux though...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 11:38:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 07:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091138.l89BcbHF015968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-09 07:38 EST ------- * Sun Sep 09 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.5-2 - fix icon http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird-0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 12:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 08:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091219.l89CJZMP020294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-09 08:19 EST ------- #sed is considered the minimum build environment #see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions #Requires: sed Sed being in the minumum build environment only affects BuildRequires but not Requires. But for building this packages, sed is not needed, so either you should add Requires: sed to the spec. Also the package requires a console web browser[1] for running, but I do not know how to ensure this with Requires. I will ask on a mailing list. Maybe you should require gzip and coreutils, too, then you should really have all requirements stated explicitly. [1] to be precise: one out of "links links2 elinks lynx w3m" needs to be installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 12:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 08:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091242.l89Cgdwd002828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-09-09 08:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Hi. Sorry I've been ignoring this once again :( > I think it would be fine for Jonathan to be the primary packager. > Fine with me, but would very much welcome a co-maintaniner, hint hint :). > I looked at the newest spec file and I read through the Emacs > packaging draft. Looking good! > Thanks. > Going back to the bbdb-autoloads.el question -- I think the reason that > this is in site-start.d is so that the autoloads will be evaluated at > Emacs startup (see site-lisp/site-start.el). This means that the user > doesn't have to add an explicit require or anything to their .emacs to > start using BBDB. I was wrong about this back in comment #10. (FWIW > this is mentioned in the packaging guidelines.) Yes - actually the best way of dealing with this IMO is to add an init file to site-lisp/site-start.d which does a (requires 'bbdb-autoloads) - that's what most packages do, and is the spirit of the guidelines - have updated the spec file to create such a file. Is this ok with you? > > In my copy of the latest RPM, bbdb-autoloads.el ends up in site-lisp/bbdb/. > So, I think it should be moved again. > As I say above - I would prefer to leave bbdb-autoloads in the site-lisp/bbdb directory, and add a file to site-lisp/site-start.d which requires bbdb-autolods > BTW ... BBDB and VM requiring each other seems pretty ugly! Perhaps one or > the other could be fixed upstream. Yeah, it's very horrible. Fortunately recently it has transpired that the same person has taken over upstream leadership of both packages, so I will begin a campaign with him to change this situation :) He is away until the end of October though. Updated SPEC: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb.spec SRPM: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb-2.35-7.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 12:48:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 08:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091248.l89CmiMN023576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-09 08:48 EST ------- Maybe a "Provides: webclient" should be added, wget does this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 13:12:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 09:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091312.l89DCBDi006508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-09 09:12 EST ------- SRPMS: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla-3.0.0-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/filezilla/filezilla.spec Description: FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client - Update to 3.0.0 ( final ) - Add fedora to deskop file install Fedora 7 is missing gnutls-devel >= 1.5.4 and Fedora Core 6 is missing also wxGTK >= 2.8.4 For thoses interested, I will provide the necessary dependencies from my personnal testing repository... http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 14:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 10:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091419.l89EJx3K014217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 10:19 EST ------- Well, * First I cannot install this rpm. ---------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost guile-gnome-platform]# LANG=C rpm -ivh --test guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-4.fc8.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/info/dir from install of guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-4.fc8 conflicts with file from package info-4.9-2.fc8 --------------------------------------------------------------- * Would you explain why guile-gnome-platform should have "Requires: orbit2-devel"? (although the ownership of %_libdir/orbit-2.0 is apparently wrong..) * build.log shows that fedora specific compilation flags are not honored under BUILD/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93/gtk/gnome/gw * Check the dependency for -devel package. For example, guile-gnome-gtk-0.pc contains the line: ------------------------------------------------- Requires: gobject-2.0 g-wrap-2.0-guile ------------------------------------------------- This means guile-gnome-platform-devel should have "Requires: g-wrap-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 14:44:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 10:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091444.l89EivFI017017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 14:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 10:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250904] Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091456.l89EuxuN006241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-python - Python bindings for FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250904 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-09 10:56 EST ------- Done. * Sun Sep 9 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) 0.2-3 - removed non used macros - Changelog file converted to UTF-8 http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/fuse-python.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/fuse-python-0.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 15:44:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 11:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091544.l89Fi3oZ023732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-09 11:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * File list of hedgewars looks strange : data files are in > "/usr/share/hedgewars/hedgewars", isn't that one "hedgewars" too many ? > * The Icon tag in the desktop file should either use the full path or not > include the file's extension > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Both fixed now: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/hedgewars.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/hedgewars-0.9.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 16:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091608.l89G8ZgU014159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 12:08 EST ------- One more comment * Gconf schemas file - gconf schemas file is not a config file and this file should not be marked as %config(noreplace) (even if rpmlint warns about it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 16:23:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275081] Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091623.l89GNlaY028110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275081 ------- Additional Comments From kraxel at redhat.com 2007-09-09 12:23 EST ------- fixed, new build uploaded to http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenwatch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 16:46:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091646.l89GkeNG030987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tromey at redhat.com 2007-09-09 12:46 EST ------- > Fine with me, but would very much welcome a co-maintaniner, hint hint :). :-). Sounds good. [ init file that requires bbdb-autoloads ] > Is this ok with you? Yes, that's great. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 16:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091652.l89GqbnM019138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 herrold at owlriver.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com ------- Additional Comments From herrold at owlriver.com 2007-09-09 12:52 EST ------- I am confused looking, matt -- GPL or LGPL -- the website states: The calc program is free. It is distributed under the GNU Lesser General Public License. Calc is open software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.1 of the License. see: http://isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 16:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091659.l89GxSTE032221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 12:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=191091) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=191091&action=view) rpmlint complaint for 3.3.1-1 Well, for 3.3.1-1 there are not a few issues to be fixed. Please check the following URLs for general packaging issue. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines A. %description stage * AutoReqProv - Please explain you want to disable AutoReqProv. The fact that you check the libraries' dependencies is _not_ a good reason because even in the case it is still preferable that the dependency for libraries are _also_ automatically checked by __find_requires. Usually you must only write "version specific Requires" for libraries and leave the other libraries' dependency to __find_requires unless you have special reason you don't want to. - Also, please consider to remove redundant version specific dependency. For example, even FC6 has GTK 2.10.13 and I don't find any reason you want to write "%define gtk_ver 2.8". * EVR specific dependency - Dependency between subpackages must be EVR (epoch:version:*release*) specific. * Vertual provides - Please explain why you want to add vertual provides such as "Provides: libqpol = %{libqpol_ver}". This may cause some complicated problems for upgrade paths by yum. * Typo - "sqlite >= ${sqlite_ver}" and so on are apparent typo. B. %prep/%build/%install stage * Timestamp - Please keep timestamp. When using "install" or "cp", use "-p" option. - Also, -------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} INSTALL="install -p" install -------------------------------------------------------- is more preferable to keep timestamps on more files. * Macros - Please use macros. For example, /usr/share must be %_datadir. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * Desktop file - desktop file must be installed by using "desktop-file-install" (BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils is needed). C. %files * defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) - Note: %defattr(0755,root,root) is usually wrong (see the debuginfo issue below). * Directory ownership issue - Please make it ensure that all the directories created by setools related rpms are surely owned by setools related rpms. Actually many directories are not owned. ---------------------------------------------------- /usr/include/apol /usr/include/poldiff /usr/include/qpol /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setools/ .... (and many others) ---------------------------------------------------- ! Note: When you write ---------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ ---------------------------------------------------- (where foo is a directory), this means the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc.. under foo/. This way of writing %files entry cleans up and shorten %files entry and makes directory ownership issue more visible than writing verbose file lists. * static archive - Static archive must be seperated from -devel subpackage and must be packages in another subpackage. D. rpmlint The result for rpmlint is attached (please check how rpmlint complains before submitting) You can get the explanation of each rpmlint by using "rpmlint -I". For example: -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint -I mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs : The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. -------------------------------------------------------- Summary: * mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs - See above. * non-executable-script - /usr/share/setools-3.3/seaudit-report-service must have executable permission * script-without-shebang - Scripts without shebang must not have executable permission * unstripped-binary-or-object - Setting executable permission by %attr like -------------------------------------------------------------- %attr(755,root,root) %{pkgpyexecdir}/_qpol.so -------------------------------------------------------------- is actually not right. Unless binaries have executable permission at the time %install ends, the binaries are not stripped by find-debuginfo.sh or so. i.e. you have to change those binaries by the time %install ends "manually", not by trying to set executable permission by %attr. * use-old-pam-stack - Using "pam_stack.so" is deprecated, and moreover, pam_stack.so module is *removed* from pam. So %_sysconfdir/pam.d/seaudit must be updated not to use pam_stack.so. * invalid-desktopfile - See above (desktop-file-install) * devel-file-in-non-devel-package - Symlinks %_libdir/*.so should be moved to -devel subpackage * symlink-should-be-relative - Please change symlinks to relative, not absolute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 17:09:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 13:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091709.l89H9aTt000938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 13:09 EST ------- And also please consider to use %_dist macro. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 17:38:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 13:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091738.l89HcN52004371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-09 13:38 EST ------- > dos2unix docs/html/handbook.html (for this method BuildRequires: dos2unix > is needed) Fixed. > Note: > 0.5.1-1 could not be rebuilt. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=152935 Fixed. Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-2.fc8.src.rpm If we can not get the thing to run on Fedora, then is there any point in proceeding with verifying the correctness of the package? Or should we revert to 0.4.4 in the worst case, since 0.5.x was a complete rewrite of PIDA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 18:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091808.l89I8k4b007669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-09 14:08 EST ------- * fixed desktop_vendor = fedora * fixed Licence to GPlv2+ * fixed Requires: * Added python >= 2.4 python-devel gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 libxml2-python >= 1.99.13 pyorbit pygtk2 >= 2.4.0 pygtk2-libglade python-dbus python-mx-base python-gnome2-extras pygtk2-devel gtk2 >= 2.4 libglade2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 18:22:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091822.l89IMtBr029187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 14:22 EST ------- Would you write the whole URLs of your spec and srpm so that we can download them easily? Also, please don't forget to increment release number each time you fix your spec file when version number does not change, and add to %changelog where you changed in your spec file briefly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 18:51:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091851.l89IpBWn012489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-09 14:51 EST ------- Using Categories the Application and X-Fedora in the .desktop is deprecated according to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481#c5 Here is also a German entry for the .desktop file: Comment[de]=Pers?nliche Finanzverwaltung You should use --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications in the desktop-file-install invocation, i.e. use either ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} or %{buildroot} in you spec. use --vendor="fedora" instead of "%{_vendor}", on my local F7 machine %{_vendor} expands to redhat, not fedora. The install invocations for source1 and 2 should be done with "-p" to preserve timestamps. You need to add GTK icon cache scriptlets, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda And also the mime cache scriptlets, see (on the same page): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-5f93ed83c968bb73b052c06ba0d7139e28f35d93 I guess this will lead to a orphaned directory: %{_datadir}/%{name}/* Better use %{_datadir}/%{name}/ to include the directory itself. This is good: :-) Tarball is identical with upstream: $ md5sum homebank-3.5.tar.gz* 4120d19081f3f67f3723cca8f847278b homebank-3.5.tar.gz 4120d19081f3f67f3723cca8f847278b homebank-3.5.tar.gz.orig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 18:57:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 14:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091857.l89Ivc48013094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-09 14:57 EST ------- New Spec file and SRPM is available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 19:11:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091911.l89JBiJG014794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 19:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] New: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/python-textile.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/python-textile-2.0.11-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Textile is a XHTML generator using a simple markup developed by Dean Allen. This is a Python port with support for code validation, itex to MathML translation, Python code coloring and much more. Note: The license seems to be identical to BSD3c. Additional note: This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 19:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:14:17 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091914.l89JEHbn002292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-09 15:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > I think using the '?' in the actual package name is just asking for trouble, > > 1. It is somewhat asking for trouble but our infrastructure needs to get utf-8 > proof and I'd rather it was done with a small package like this than in an > urgent way when a bigger package lands. There is really an astonishing few > problems revealed by this package, and it's a pity to stop just >< this close to > full support Testing the infrastructure should not be tied to a review request. Your srpm is good enough to test the infrastructure with it, but without adding the package to fedora. A real package add to fedora should never ever be used to test the infrastructure. > 2. your know how we French are, we care about our language I am french, and I care more about compatibility... But maybe I have been contaminated with the english language virus. And also it is to note that some french people care even more about their iso latin1 encoding ;) and set their locales appropriately (yes, yes I know more than one). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 19:22:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091922.l89JMi7v003432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-09 15:22 EST ------- License is GPLv2+ (GPL version 2 or later) according to source code header and help within the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 19:42:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 15:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709091942.l89JgvVp005582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-09 15:42 EST ------- Till: thanks for your suggestions, the respective changes have been included together with a fix for compilation on Rawhide (new open() semantics). The new packages are here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/isync.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/isync-1.0.3-3.fc8.i386/isync-1.0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Mock output is: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/isync-1.0.3-3.fc8.i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 20:16:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092016.l89KGmon021936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-09 16:16 EST ------- Review for release 2.fc7: * RPM name is OK * Source hedgewars-src-0.9.0.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Plays fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 20:18:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092018.l89KIIgs009495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-09-09 16:18 EST ------- Package appears correct and builds correctly as well. APPROVED BTW, sync isn't Apple(TM) trademark as per http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 20:25:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092025.l89KPoJx022926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-09 16:25 EST ------- Marek: thanks for looking up that apple isync thing, I was a bit worried about it. CVS admins, here's the request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: isync Short Description: Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Owners: lkundrak Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 EL-4 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 21:08:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 17:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092108.l89L8pxp015074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-09 17:08 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hedgewars Short Description: 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 21:35:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 17:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] New: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype- based programming language Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Io-language.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Io-language-20070710-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Io is a small, prototype-based programming language. The ideas in Io are mostly inspired by Smalltalk (all values are objects), Self (prototype-based), NewtonScript (differential inheritance), Act1 (actors and futures for concurrency), LISP (code is a runtime inspectable/modifiable tree) and Lua (small, embeddable). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:18:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092218.l89MI0fU002796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:28:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092228.l89MS8Jk023966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:28 EST ------- cvs done. See note on radeontool about adding ajax... you should be able to do it via web interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092224.l89MO5IX023415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:24 EST ------- cvs done. The command line tool doesn't have the ability to just do watchcommits and commit access. You should be able to use the web interface to setup ajax for those. Let me know if you run into any problems doing so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:31:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092231.l89MVapN004482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092238.l89McYWH005188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:34:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092234.l89MYiLh024716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:36:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092236.l89ManeA025237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-09 18:36 EST ------- GPL, as per section 3 of LGPL v2.1, so we can link against readline. This is a temporary situation I'm working on dealing with upstream. Alternately, there's logic in the spec file to build without readline and remain LGPL. I'm open to making that the default if we have other non-GPL-compatible free software packages in Fedora that people are interested in linking against calc. That uses the much-inferior internal line editing routines, though, and makes the command-line program noticeably less nice to use, so I'd prefer to not. The upstream possibilities are 1) modify the source to be libedit/editline compatible (or fix whatever it is in libedit's readline-interface compatibility layer that isn't working), or 2) split the package so the math and language libraries don't need to be linked against the line input code -- then, the command line "calc" program can by GPL and the libraries (which have no real use for readline) can stay LGPL. #1 is probably relatively trivial; #2 manageable but less so. If you'd like to help with either, that'd be awesome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 186632] Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092240.l89Me4o9025757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: svn2cl - Create a ChangeLog from a Subversion log https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186632 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:43:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092243.l89Mh1pY025922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092245.l89MjIlU006145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:50:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092250.l89MoJHm006711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:50 EST ------- >From the Licensing page, the tag here should be "LGPLv2+" (Thats used for both 2 and 2.1). cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 22:58:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 18:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092258.l89Mwxsi027622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-09 18:58 EST ------- Xavier: Can you address the items from comment #10 and then reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? when the package is ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 9 23:25:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709092325.l89NPjZ1030810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 nsboyle at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 00:50:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100050.l8A0omtM007668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-09-09 20:50 EST ------- I've tested the package with Gimp 2.4rc2 on rawhide/F8test and it builds and functions correctly. Since we seem to be shelving the the rename until/unless it becomes necessary I think that the second version of the package will do as the final version, so unless anyone's got any objection it just remains to get sponsored and get it into the CVS. Should I submit a Fedora account request now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 02:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 22:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100246.l8A2ks3J021025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-09 22:46 EST ------- * At least libpng-devel is missing? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153491 (Recently, I seldom use normal rpmbuild and I usually use mock or koji...) * For scons, the following maybe useful. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/aqsis/devel/aqsis.spec Would you try to use scons on %install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 05:02:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100502.l8A52RZF003970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 Bug 256521 depends on bug 283401, which changed state. Bug 283401 Summary: "pear install" hangs on non default channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283401 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 05:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100542.l8A5g80I020295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-10 01:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The command line tool doesn't have the ability to just do watchcommits and > commit access. You should be able to use the web interface to setup ajax for > those. > Let me know if you run into any problems doing so. I do not see a way to add him. Maybe he is the only one, who can change it then by adding himself to the package. I will ask him then, to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 05:58:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100558.l8A5wk54010626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-10 01:58 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 9751433785d98e069f4c404c2d3d3231 FileZilla_3.0.0_src.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + update-desktop-database scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + filezilla-3.0.0-1.fc8 package -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libgnutls.so.13 libgnutls.so.13(GNUTLS_1_3) libidn.so.11 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0 libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 06:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100647.l8A6lXal016422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-10 02:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I've tested the package with Gimp 2.4rc2 on rawhide/F8test and it builds and > functions correctly. Since we seem to be shelving the the rename until/unless > it becomes necessary I think that the second version of the package will do as > the final version, so unless anyone's got any objection it just remains to get > sponsored and get it into the CVS. > > Should I submit a Fedora account request now? Seems good to me. Xavier? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 07:00:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100700.l8A702fN029338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 03:00 EST ------- Umm.. * Does your srpm really work for you? (i.e. can you really rebuild your srpm?) The typo "%{__python)" is not fixed and this prevents me from being rebuilt correctly http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153235 You can see that only srpm is created. * And even after I fix the typo, the srpm cannot be rebuilt. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 07:05:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100705.l8A75ba1018751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |226223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 07:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100705.l8A75aRo018727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ORBit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |254211 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 07:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100718.l8A7IW9D031688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 03:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * At least libpng-devel is missing? > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153491 > (Recently, I seldom use normal rpmbuild and I usually use > mock or koji...) I guess I should change my habbits and stat using koji scratchbuilds to test BuildRequires, I (almost) never used mock because of my relatively slow internet connection at home. I'll add the missing BR and run it to koji to make sure its ok now and then post a new version. > * For scons, the following maybe useful. > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/aqsis/devel/aqsis.spec > Would you try to use scons on %install? The problem with scons is that in order for things like settings CCFLAGS to work the scons file must be written properly, which it often isn't (hence my overriding CC trick in this case), the same goes for install. And fixing scons SConstruct files is a pain as its rather badly documented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 08:00:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:00:16 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100800.l8A80GKP025864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 mefoster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mefoster at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From mefoster at gmail.com 2007-09-10 04:00 EST ------- Tiny little nit-pick (I was curious about this package and took a look): s/traditionnal/traditional/ in the Description. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 08:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100802.l8A82dl3026489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ORBit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 04:02 EST ------- For 2.14.7-6: * License - Please recheck the license * Most source codes do not specify any version and it seems that source codes which contain license term contain "and any later" term. So at least this can be "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+" * Redundant requires - For devel -------------------------------------------------- Requires: glib2-devel Requires: glib2-devel >= %{glib2_version} -------------------------------------------------- The first line can be omitted. * Parallel make - Support parallel make when possible. * %makeinstall - Please avoid %makeinstall when possible. - Usually I recommend -------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" -------------------------------------------------- for recent Makefile. This will keep timestamps on most files * Directory ownership issue - Please fix up directory ownership issue. -------------------------------------------------- %_libdir/orbit-2.0 - must owned by main, not by devel %_datadir/idl - must owned by ORBit2-devel, not by libbonobo-devel * Defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Rpmlint - file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ORBit2-2.14.7/NEWS * Please change the encoding to UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 08:22:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100822.l8A8MaJv029524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ORBit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |225989 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 08:22:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225989] Merge Review: libbonobo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100822.l8A8MZMH029512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libbonobo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225989 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |226223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 08:27:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:27:49 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100827.l8A8RnVH030210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-09-10 04:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #14) > A real package add to fedora > should never ever be used to test the infrastructure. That's the only thing that ever tests the infrastructure, because the rest does not exist. And that's a practical assesment. > > 2. your know how we French are, we care about our language > > I am french, and I care more about compatibility... Get real the worst your users will see is one miscoded glyph in their package manager UI. And they already get a ton of those by choosing not to use the distro default encoding, because all our French material is UTF-8 encoded. Bottom point: they can continue as they used to, and they'll even be able to get the new font, provided they suffer a little UI unpleasantness, which won't kill them > But maybe > I have been contaminated with the english language virus. Nope you've been contaminated by the "I want to keep on life-support features that died clinicaly years ago". Which is fine as long as you don't freeze the rest of the distro to make your life easier. I suppose you also object to X not dying anymore when legacy core fonts are misconfigured. (In reply to comment #18) > Tiny little nit-pick (I was curious about this package and took a look): > s/traditionnal/traditional/ in the Description. :) Nice catch I'll fix it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 08:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:33:04 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=A9colier-c?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ourt-fonts_-_=C3colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100833.l8A8X4vB031067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ?colier-court-fonts - ?colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2007-09-10 04:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > And also it is to note that some french people care even more > about their iso latin1 encoding ;) BTW just to show how ridiculous your position is: all the letters the French language uses are not included in latin-1, nor is the symbol for the money your users have their bank account labeled in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 09:02:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100902.l8A92FBs013755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-10 05:02 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/libzzub-0.2.3-3.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: (- Source0 URL) - fixed redundant dependencies - replaced occurence of /usr with prefix macro - removed manual stripping of binaries - fixed directory ownership issue - fixed encoding of CREDITS file - excluded arch ppc64 due to build failure - replaced all space occurences with tabs About the Python dependency: libzzub is usually used in conjunction with pyzzub that requires Python 2.5 to be compiled without ctypes, hence two different spec versions would be needed to provide both variants. Source: http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Is it save to remove the explicit require, i.e. for cases of downgrading what would break the package? The workstation this repository runs on is stable now, so it should be save now to provide the files from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 09:56:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709100956.l8A9ulIl022362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 05:56 EST ------- Here is a package with the buildRequires fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/boswars.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/boswars-2.4.1-2.fc8.src.rpm And here is the kojibuild of it: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:01:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101001.l8AA1dre023181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-10 06:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, > > * First I cannot install this rpm. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > [root at localhost guile-gnome-platform]# LANG=C rpm -ivh --test > guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-4.fc8.i386.rpm > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > file /usr/share/info/dir from install of > guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-4.fc8 conflicts with file from package info-4.9-2.fc8 > --------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for pointed me this, not happened on mine. > > * Would you explain why guile-gnome-platform should have > "Requires: orbit2-devel"? (although the ownership of > %_libdir/orbit-2.0 is apparently wrong..) > _libdir/orbit-2.0 is currently owned by ORBit2-devel, so this package have to be installed > * build.log shows that fedora specific compilation flags are not > honored under > BUILD/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93/gtk/gnome/gw > Will check this, thanks > * Check the dependency for -devel package. > For example, guile-gnome-gtk-0.pc contains the line: > ------------------------------------------------- > Requires: gobject-2.0 g-wrap-2.0-guile > ------------------------------------------------- > This means guile-gnome-platform-devel should have > "Requires: g-wrap-devel this has already been fixed for release *-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101013.l8AADhMK024573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 06:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > * Would you explain why guile-gnome-platform should have > > "Requires: orbit2-devel"? (although the ownership of > > %_libdir/orbit-2.0 is apparently wrong..) > > > _libdir/orbit-2.0 is currently owned by ORBit2-devel, > so this package have to be installed - So I am now reviewing Merge review of ORBit2 (bug 226223). Anyway main package should not require ORBit2-devel. > > * Check the dependency for -devel package. > > For example, guile-gnome-gtk-0.pc contains the line: > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Requires: gobject-2.0 g-wrap-2.0-guile > > ------------------------------------------------- > > This means guile-gnome-platform-devel should have > > "Requires: g-wrap-devel > > this has already been fixed for release *-3 - Please also check other .pc file. For example, guile-gnome-libgnomeui-0.pc says -devel subpackage should require guile-cairo-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:16:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225623] Merge Review: bootparamd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101016.l8AAGcqC025195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bootparamd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225623 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(stransky at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-09-10 06:16 EST ------- That should be fixed with the current package maintainer who is Ondrej Dvoracek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:17:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225623] Merge Review: bootparamd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101017.l8AAHvK6013544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bootparamd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225623 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(odvorace at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:48:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101048.l8AAmCEw028897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-10 06:48 EST ------- ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:48:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101048.l8AAmo1o028942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:49:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101049.l8AAncqk029026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 10:50:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101050.l8AAo7CD029401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 11:20:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257941] Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101120.l8ABKRFf000530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hedgewars - 2D tankbattle game with the tanks replaced by hedgehogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257941 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 07:20 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 11:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101158.l8ABwZla005067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-10 07:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: filezilla Short Description: FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client Owners: kwizart Branches: devel InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 12:02:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101202.l8AC2TUg005889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 08:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=191591) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=191591&action=view) gdb log for boswars 2.4.1-2.fc8 on rawhide Almost okay, except for one minor rpmlint and one strange crash * file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/boswars-2.4.1/guichan-copyright.txt - Please change the encoding to UTF-8. * SIGABRT - Well, when I launch this by "boswars -d /usr/share/bosward" boswars crashes immediately. gdb log attached. What is strange is that when I am watching at some .flv file by xine (so I am listening to some music), boswards can surely be launched. Would you know why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 12:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101203.l8AC3me4026338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 08:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > * SIGABRT > - Well, when I launch this by "boswars -d /usr/share/bosward" s|bosward|boswars| > What is strange is that when I am watching at some .flv file > by xine (so I am listening to some music), boswards can surely > be launched. s|boswards|boswars| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 13:07:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101307.l8AD7mnc014964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 rf10 at cam.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rf10 at cam.ac.uk ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-10 09:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Version of 0.9 is now available via the yum repo for i386 and x86_64: > > http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/texlive.repo > > just install it to /etc/yum.repos.d/ and yum install texlive (and texlive-latex). we're running this on an experimental dc7 machine. had problems (so far) with: maps for cm-super family maps for fourier family in both cases, updmap was building maps using dvipdfm components for the family. this produces a corrupt pdftex map (at least). installing the dvips maps for those families from the tex-live dvd solved the problem pfb files for cm-super files absent, so installed from the dvd, too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 13:41:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101341.l8ADffYc008084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 09:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=191591) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=191591&action=view) [edit] > gdb log for boswars 2.4.1-2.fc8 on rawhide > > Almost okay, except for one minor rpmlint and one strange crash > > * file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/boswars-2.4.1/guichan-copyright.txt > - Please change the encoding to UTF-8. > Will fix before import. How did you find this out? rpmlint used to warn about issues like thus, but no longer seems to do this, atleast not for me? > * SIGABRT > - Well, when I launch this by "boswars -d /usr/share/bosward" > boswars crashes immediately. gdb log attached. > > What is strange is that when I am watching at some .flv file > by xine (so I am listening to some music), boswards can surely > be launched. Would you know why? > Judging from the X errorhandler output (and experience) your videocards / drivers Xvideo support cannot handle the requested movie size / format. I remember writing ugly workarounds for this catching the Xerror and reverting to another format, when coding the XVideo support for xmame. Things work when you have xine running because that is already using your XVideo overlay port and thus boswars reverts to software video rendering mode. Depending on how you look at this, this is either an SDL bug (it should catch the error and revert to soft rendering mode, tell them to go dig in the xmame XVideo code for the ugliness of this), or a video driver bug as it shouldn't advertise xvideo capabilities it later turns out it cannot offer. Either way its not boswars fault. Feel free to file a bug against SDL or your video driver (I guess both would be best), and put me in the CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 13:53:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101353.l8ADrSXF021796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-10 09:53 EST ------- The following line in straw.spec installs straw.png in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps: install -m0644 ./images/%{name}.png \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps But you have not included it in the %files section. Add the following line in %files section: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/%{name}.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 13:52:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101352.l8ADqujw021755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-09-10 09:52 EST ------- See my comments below. The only thing is that I think we should either: a) strip the tests from the SRPM to avoid worrying about the LGPL issue or b) add LGPL to the License line in the specfile and/or consult with legal to see if it should or should not be there. Otherwise, things are good to go. Thanks for doing this, Ben. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > ? license field matches the actual license. > > - it says in the git web repo that some of it is LGPL ... but I can't see > > what parts - can you? I'm okay with the dual GPLv2 and EPL as that's what > > I can see. > > The tests are LGPL but we're not shipping them. Should I add LGPL to the License > line because it's included in the src.rpm? I really have no idea. Let's strip them from the SRPM so we don't have to worry about it. > > ? verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > > - I can't get the same md5sum but the contents are the same. Did you use wget? > > No, wget doesn't work with the git web repo. I manually clicked on the link to > get the file. Hmm. I used wget and just renamed the file. There are no content differences, though, so I'm okay with it. > > NEEDS_FIX we should probably fill in some of feature.xml such as the licence > section > > I added the information that I could. This patch really needs to be upstream so > that this information can be filled in properly. Okay, that sounds fine. > > ? should there be any user-visible eclipse features other than Team->Share? > > No checkout? I know you said they were making a new release soon with a > > whole bunch of new features so should we wait until then? I'm legitimately > > asking, not trying to be snide. > > IMO this plugin needs a lot of work to be functional. I asked one of the > developers about their timeline but haven't received a reply yet. > > > I notice a lot of stuff being spewed to the > > console as well ... do they have a bug tracker upstream? > > No, not that I know of. > > > I guess what I'm > > trying to say is that we shouldn't have it be installed by default in the > > Eclipse group of comps.xml just yet. What do you think? > > That seems reasonable. Okay, I'm glad that it's going to be available so we can get it some exposure. > > ? should we split the package into two: the java git implementation and the > > eclipse plugin? I guess we can do that in the future if anything else > > starts using the java git implementation > > Yeah, I think it should be kept together until something needs it. Agreed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 14:06:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101406.l8AE67Mg011482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 10:06 EST ------- For 0.2.3-3: Almost good. * Internal library - build log says: ---------------------------------------------------------- gcc -o src/flac/src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.o -c src/flac/src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c ar rc lib/libFLAC.a src/flac/src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.o g++ -o lib/libzzub.so.0.2.3 -Llib -lFLAC -lz -ldl -lpthread -lsndfile -lasound -lrtaudio_static -lasound -ljack -lrt -lpthread -lm ---------------------------------------------------------- Here the internal libFLAC is used. However flac-devel is in Fedora so please fix the source code so that libzzub.so uses external libFLAC.so. * Documents - The file "INSTALL" is for people who want to compile and install this by themselves and not needed for people who install this package using rpm. * Source0 - is written twice - Well, now you have disabled MP3 support. However Fedora requests that you have to remove MP3 support even on source code devel. So, please - first remove mp3 support part from libzzub tarball. As far as I am correct, you have to * remove src/libmad * and remove USE_LIBMAD part from src/libzzub/libzzub.cpp - And repackage it as libzzub-0.2.3-fe.tar.bz2, for example and use it as Source0 - Add a comment in the spec file like ------------------------------------------------------------- # The original source code is from: # http://download.sourceforge.net/.... # # For fedora tarball, the MP3 support parts are removed # - src/libmad : completely removed # - src/libzzub/libzzub.cpp: removed MP3 support part Source0: libzzub-0.2.3-fe.tar.bz2 -------------------------------------------------------------- * About python: > libzzub is usually used in conjunction with pyzzub - Then pyzzub should have "Requires: python" and libzzub need not require python. > Is it save to remove the explicit require, i.e. for cases of downgrading what > would break the package? - Thinking about "downgrade" is a "very specific" case and in that case usually extra consideration is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 14:25:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101425.l8AEP76P026914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 10:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Created an attachment (id=191591) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=191591&action=view) [edit] [edit] > > gdb log for boswars 2.4.1-2.fc8 on rawhide > > > > Almost okay, except for one minor rpmlint and one strange crash > > > > * file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/boswars-2.4.1/guichan-copyright.txt > > - Please change the encoding to UTF-8. > > > > > Will fix before import. How did you find this out? rpmlint used to warn about > issues like thus, but no longer seems to do this, atleast not for me? - For me rpmlint (0.81-1.fc8) surely detected this, for binary rpm and installed rpm. > > > * SIGABRT > > - Well, when I launch this by "boswars -d /usr/share/bosward" > > boswars crashes immediately. gdb log attached. > > > > What is strange is that when I am watching at some .flv file > > by xine (so I am listening to some music), boswards can surely > > be launched. Would you know why? > > > > Judging from the X errorhandler output (and experience) your videocards / > drivers Xvideo support cannot handle the requested movie size / format. I > remember writing ugly workarounds for this catching the Xerror and reverting to > another format, when coding the XVideo support for xmame. Things work when you > have xine running because that is already using your XVideo overlay port and > thus boswars reverts to software video rendering mode. > > Depending on how you look at this, this is either an SDL bug (it should catch > the error and revert to soft rendering mode, tell them to go dig in the xmame > XVideo code for the ugliness of this), or a video driver bug as it shouldn't > advertise xvideo capabilities it later turns out it cannot offer. Well, then I will try to open a report for xorg-x11-drv-i810? Or maybe (from gdb log) against libxcb? Anyway okay for this package. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (boswars) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 14:32:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101432.l8AEW4co015398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-10 10:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > a) strip the tests from the SRPM to avoid worrying about the LGPL issue Afaik does the License Tag refer to the shipped binaries, this should be on mentioned the -devel list . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 14:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101430.l8AEUAQq015117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-10 10:30 EST ------- Build failed in devel. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=153467&name=build.log Tried it in local mock, which failed, the same way. I tried adding libX11-devel to the BRs, and still nothing. Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 14:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101437.l8AEbQIu028802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 10:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Depending on how you look at this, this is either an SDL bug (it should catch > > the error and revert to soft rendering mode, tell them to go dig in the xmame > > XVideo code for the ugliness of this), or a video driver bug as it shouldn't > > advertise xvideo capabilities it later turns out it cannot offer. > > Well, then I will try to open a report for xorg-x11-drv-i810? > Or maybe (from gdb log) against libxcb? > You could try to file a bug against the i810-driver but I'm not sure this can be fixed there, it might just not know that things will fail until the first frame gets pushed (thats what happened in xmame). So then a workaround (catching the error, falling back to sw rendering) needs to be added to SDL. libxcb is not involved here (atleast not in a bad way). > Anyway okay for this package. > ------------------------------------------------------- > This package (boswars) is APPROVED by me > ------------------------------------------------------- > > New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: boswars Short Description: Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 14:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101443.l8AEhJ6P029722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 10:43 EST ------- You probably need to add "libXt-devel" to the BuildRequires (don't ask). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 15:04:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101504.l8AF4P1u000566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 11:04 EST ------- Note: I just reproduced the video related crash on my work PC. As I've worked around this in xmame in the past I'll try to write a workaround for SDL too. Having this crash is quite bad considering the popularity of i810 video. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 15:32:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225866] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-good In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101532.l8AFWMOH004931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-good https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225866 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 15:49:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101549.l8AFno8D028993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-10 11:49 EST ------- Wow, that worked in local mock. I can't figure out why, as all the lib strings in the executable are from libX11 and xorg-X11-proto-devel. I've submitted to koji for devel, but it appears to be slightly backlogged. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 15:54:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101554.l8AFsX2F008855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-10 11:54 EST ------- I've done a review of the package as-is, here are my notes: - tarfile matches upstream with the following md5 sum: $ md5sum condor-BUILD-V6_9-trunk-2007-9-7.tar.gz d6fb0aa4bb1aba0617d09436b6dae8e4 condor-BUILD-V6_9-trunk-2007-9-7.tar.gz - couldn't build in mock under fedora-devel - as expected, rpmlint gives warning about license: $ rpmlint condor-6.9.5-0.1.20070907cvs.src.rpm W: condor invalid-license Condor Public License - some lines in the specfile are longer than 80 characters - license text (LICENSE.TXT) is missing from the package (the %doc line is commented out) The last two items can be fixed independently of the other (major) issues of building under fedora-devel and getting a compatible license. Nuno -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 15:57:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233070] gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101557.l8AFvSne030519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-web-photo: HTML pages thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233070 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-10 11:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > From the Licensing page, the tag here should be "LGPLv2+" (Thats used for both 2 > and 2.1). Fixed, thanks! Uploaded as gnome-web-photo-0.3-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 15:59:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101559.l8AFxRRW030718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-10 11:59 EST ------- Ok, the koji build failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=154305&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=154305&name=root.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101606.l8AG61eg032042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2007-09-10 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp.spec > SRPM URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp-0.1.3.1-2.fc7.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp-0.1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm - new version available (.spec updated too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:18:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101618.l8AGIW8L001368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-10 12:18 EST ------- Quick initial comments: 1. Drop Requires: flac >= 1.1.3 jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.102.5 libmpcdec >= 1.2.2 alsa-lib taglib qt4 >= 4.2 rpm should auto-req these without listing them explicitly. 2. wrt desktop-file-install usage, drop --add-category X-Fedora --add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra see also: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:21:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101621.l8AGL6KY002005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-10 12:21 EST ------- Anynews abbout the naming of gimp plugin from development-list@ ? (sorry not followed all thread on the list) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101629.l8AGTPmZ013978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-10 12:29 EST ------- Another one: texmf.cnf has TEXMFLOCAL = $SELFAUTOPARENT/../texmf-local this results in $ kpsewhich -expand-var "\$TEXMFLOCAL" //../texmf-local which isn't helpful. since all other tree specs in the file are absolute, i guess the local tree ought to be, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:40:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101640.l8AGeBqL004851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(marduk at k-d-w.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 12:40 EST ------- Sebastian, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:51:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101651.l8AGpmPr006647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-09-10 12:51 EST ------- Andrew, Let me know what needs to be done wrt the License tag - I have no complaints either way. Thanks, Ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:51:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101651.l8AGpZBl006571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-10 12:51 EST ------- flpsed-0.5.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 16:56:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101656.l8AGuu9K007861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-10 12:56 EST ------- Well we probably need to use the current plugins rules for this, and the same for gimp-gap which I'm working on (for third part repo )... Then it would be easiers to leave the upstream name as it is... About this review, this seems good to me also... @Nils Maybe ufraw-gimp need to have a vitural provides: gimp-ufraw, same for cinepaint-ufraw ;) @Xavier thx for taking this review, I couldn't as Ewan wasn't already sponsored.. @Ewan do you have other review to submit ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:03:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101703.l8AH3qGH008770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 marduk at k-d-w.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(marduk at k-d-w.org) | ------- Additional Comments From marduk at k-d-w.org 2007-09-10 13:03 EST ------- Okay, I completed the steps in the "Get a Fedora Account" section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:22:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101722.l8AHMGIo011701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 13:22 EST ------- Well, first fix the issue pointed out by Jason on comment 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101732.l8AHWhSJ024636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-10 13:32 EST ------- Ooops, I forgot to include the German comment in the desktop file :/ I'll do this and rebuild as soon as possible, sorry :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101728.l8AHSxW5024037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-10 13:28 EST ------- Thanks :) Changes have been made. New RULs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank-3.5-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:30:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101730.l8AHUSc8013075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 13:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Wow, that worked in local mock. I can't figure out why, as all the lib strings > in the executable are from libX11 and xorg-X11-proto-devel. I've submitted to > koji for devel, but it appears to be slightly backlogged. > libXt-devel is needed because old configure scripts check for X11/Intrinsic.h, even though apps usually don't use that :) (In reply to comment #11) > Ok, the koji build failed. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=154305&name=build.log > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=154305&name=root.log > Hmm, looks like 64bit issue, investigating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101738.l8AHchkU013925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-10 13:38 EST ------- Hum... I did'nt pay attention, but there already is a comment for german language in the upstream package : "Comment[de]=Freie, einfache, pers?nliche Buchhaltung f?r alle." I don't know why its not present in the installed files, i'll investigate :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:44:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101744.l8AHiHE5026290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 13:44 EST ------- Okay, passing: '--x-includes="" --x-libraries=""' to %configure should disable configures broken X checking without any side-effects and thus be the easiest way to fix this. You can then also drop the libXt-devel BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 17:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101752.l8AHqTVD016288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-09-10 13:52 EST ------- Let's leave the license as-is (GPLv2, EPL) and leave the source tarball as-is as well. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 18:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284961] New: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/serenity.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/serenity-1.7.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description (from the author's website): Serenity is a soft and quiet theme to ease your mind, with a lot of options to make the Serenity yours. This is my second package, and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 18:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101829.l8AITPG3000810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 18:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282261] Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101833.l8AIXon0001438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: isync - Tool to synchronize IMAP4 and Maildir mailboxes Alias: isync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282261 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-10 14:33 EST ------- The package has been imported into CVS and built in all branches. Thanks Kevin, Marek and Tiil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 18:41:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101841.l8AIfmRi023955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-10 14:41 EST ------- Worked like a charm. Added your line, and had to add libX11-devel back, and it worked, in a local mock build and koji devel. Many thanks. I can't actually test anything x64 wise. I have a machine in the house with the appropriate hardware support, but my wife has it running That Other OS. For now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:04:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244478] Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101904.l8AJ46mN006338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4-theme-quarticurve - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve widget theme to Qt 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244478 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0-0.2.beta3 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-10 15:04 EST ------- Whoops, I forgot to close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:06:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248358] Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101906.l8AJ6BES027663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-filesystem - KDE filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248358 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.5-6 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-10 15:06 EST ------- Why is this still open? This has been in the repo for a while. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101912.l8AJCAQ1007933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-10 15:12 EST ------- Some comments 'bout release *-3.5-2: # Desktop file Category "Application" is still present and must be remove. Use "--remove-category" flag to do so. MimeType is missing from desktop entry. this sourcetarball is shipped with an desktop file, why add anorher one ? It's more appropriate to fix upstream shipped files which's present instead of add another one if necessary. # Timstamps timestamps should be set/kept on all installed images,icons and docs files and currently they aren't. Use "INSTALL='install -p'" flag with "make install" to do so. # Requires Require pango is redundant. Already set by rpmbuild. # desktop file icon. Also shipped with this source, why add another one ? # Documentations About _datadir/%{name}/help ... seem to be a bit large as doc. I don't think it's mandatory that it be split into a -doc subpackage, But you should think about this. Also, this directory should be marked as doc (including doc/TODO file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:48:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101948.l8AJmjfC013375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-10 15:48 EST ------- The specfile link seems to be invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:49:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101949.l8AJnhFJ013486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-10 15:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101953.l8AJrBeB002002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-10 15:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > The specfile link seems to be invalid. Permissions problem (scp preserves permissions, didn't know that) fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:52:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101952.l8AJqFql001917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-10 15:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 19:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709101957.l8AJvkm9002773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-10 15:57 EST ------- * fixed typo error * fixed python dependecy * Rebuild srpm succesfully * currently facing problem with dbus module of python-dbus * here is the koji build status [ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=154689&name=build.log] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 20:05:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102005.l8AK5cC6004051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From qark at ospace.net 2007-09-10 16:05 EST ------- All problems listed in comment #3 should be fixed: - licencse is now GPLv2+ - spec files uses correct source file - BuildRequires dependencies fixed - using %{buildroot} macro now - fixed content and installation of .desktop file - release number is now 0.2.2-1 as I'm using new upstream version Spec URL: http://ospace.net/files/0.2.2-1/outerspace.spec SRPM URL: http://ospace.net/files/0.2.2-1/outerspace-0.2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Thanks for our review comments and accept apology for delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 20:33:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102033.l8AKXKQA007654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-10 16:33 EST ------- I don't think that mv %{buildroot}%{_texmf_main}/web2c/*.opt %{buildroot}%{_texmf_conf}/web2c/ for file in `ls %{buildroot}%{_texmf_conf}/web2c/ | egrep 'opt$'`; do filename="`basename ${file}`" ln -sf %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/${filename} %{buildroot}%{_texmf_main}/web2c/ done is right. The place where you, as a packager, put config files should be separated from the place where local admins put their config, so I think that symlinking is wrong. Now regarding which files should be under the sole packager ruling (ie in %{_datadir}) and which one should be in %{_sysconfdir}, I think that it should depend on * is it something a user should want to change? if no, then it is for the packager * is there something that is likely to change with releases if yes it should better be for the packager. Based on this I think that the following should go below %{_sysconfig} (and the remaining remain in usr/share/texmf/): texmf/dvipdfm/cid-x.map texmf/web2c/mktexdir.opt They should be %config(noreplace) mktexnam.opt and mktex.opt (contrary to what I said above) should not be in {_sysconfig}, the user in general would better be if he left those under your control. Since you moved kpathsea related programs to main texlive, you should update the %descriptions texhash should certainly be with kpse* binaries. certainly a miss: W: texlive dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/ovf2ovp omfonts Maybe one of those isn't in the right package? W: texlive-fonts dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/mktexfmt fmtutil I guess that the following are right: W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/cslatex pdftex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/platex ptex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/pdfplatex-pl pdftex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/platex-pl pdftex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/latex pdftex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/pdfcslatex pdftex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/xelatex xetex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/platex209 ptex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/mllatex pdftex W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/man/man1/pdflatex.1.gz pdftex.1.gz W: texlive-latex dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/pdflatex pdftex Minor issue, there is still a wrong comment about t1lib In the dvips description: * dvips is not only for tex. it is a converter. So I propose for 1st sentetence: Dvips converts .dvi files to PostScript(TM) format. Or, if you want to mention TeX: Dvips converts .dvi files, for example those produced by the TeX text formatting system, to PostScript(TM) format. * I think that texlive-afm is not directly useful with dvips and the mention to texlive-afm should be dropped from dvips. vfontmap.sample should not be in %{_datadir}/texmf/pxdvi, but only in %doc. (or in the texmf doc directory). Regarding the license issues, the files should be removed from the tarball, like explained on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL I can do it if you want to. You didn't took Comment #50 into account, do you want a patch? And about splitting subpackages that have a distinct upstream, adding only what was in tetex and not using the texlive- prefix for the packages that should be split, what is your opinion? Just tell me if you like some parts, such that I make a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 20:40:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102040.l8AKeZqK009051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-10 16:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > If TeXLive is not included now into Fedora, there will be *no* > TeXLive in it, making F8 terribly poor in comparison > with other distros, such as > Mandriva or SuSE, where texlive is already included. I missed this one... But I think that it is the wrong way to think about packaging in fedora. We are looking for excellence, not for completeness. And we shouldn't lower the quality of our packages to compete with other distros. In general, I find fedora packaging of better quality than in other distros, and I think it is important to keep packages as perfect as possible. Now, this is my vision, and another packager may think otherwise, and also disagree on what would be the right packaging for texlive, and I also know that I can be perfectionist and for those reasons, and others, I haven't assigned that review to me although I made a lot of comments, because I want to leave room for other packagers to approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 20:44:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102044.l8AKi6mS021248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-10 16:44 EST ------- What about using sed instead of perl for the substitutions in mkconf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 21:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102125.l8ALPJPj027332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-10 17:25 EST ------- Thx for the review! closing the bug for next release... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 22:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102219.l8AMJTo0022324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-10 18:19 EST ------- SPEC: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform.spec SRPM: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/laxathom/task_154806/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 22:53:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102253.l8AMr29k026513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 22:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] New: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/fmtools/fmtools.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/fmtools/fmtools-1.0.2-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Simple Video for Linux radio card programs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 22:55:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102255.l8AMt5GX026959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 22:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] New: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/jack-rack/jack-rack.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/jack-rack/jack-rack-1.4.6-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API There is a need to advice Fernando (ccrma maintainer) to co-ordinate the Fedora merge of this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 23:01:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285351] New: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/xcalib/xcalib.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/xcalib/xcalib-0.8-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org This is an optionnal requirement of oyranos (still in review...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 23:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102317.l8ANHnV4030004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-10 19:17 EST ------- What policy should we follow in this case (still no answear from upstream) Should we choose the more restrictive one The one which is written in the source code headers ? If animoph is GPL that implies that every app that link against it to be GPL also...So this change nothing about makehuman. I think that thoses libs was certainly taken out of makehumain to be buildable externally.. So they only changed the COPYING while doing make dist... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 23:24:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102324.l8ANOk7u030619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239936 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 23:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102324.l8ANOj1U030607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|239911 |285351 Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-10 19:24 EST ------- So, i've made few improvements since devel was failed (because of Fedora -> Pacakges changes during the freeze ) The above error are corrected but i still need to test why i have erros when i removed commercial icc profiles... Whereas if I have them installed, there is still the same error... I will do some testing with a fresh installed rawhide... Now there is a new (optionnal) dependency. But there is a need to figure out what to do with standard paths as it bundles also some icc profiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 10 23:38:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709102338.l8ANc6kV032446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2007-09-10 19:38 EST ------- Naming: It was a very short thread on fedora-devel, there wasn't a lot of interest at this point. The end result was that we'd leave the naming scheme as-is for now, and consider change it in future if it ever becomes necessary to use a classified system. @Nicolas - Another review? If you mean a review I've done of another package the only one where I've really contributed much (so far) was the flpsed one (bug #252125); if you mean have I another package to be reviewed, then not yet, but I've part way through packaging gpscorrelate[1], but it needs a few rough edges filing off. [1] http://freefoote.dview.net/linux_gpscorr.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 00:35:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:35:21 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl3945-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=EF=BF=BD_PRO/Wireless_3945_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?A/B/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110035.l8B0ZLx6007809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl3945-firmware - Firmware for Intel??? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: iwl3945- |Review Request: iwl3945- |firmware - Firmware for |firmware - Firmware for |Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 |Intel??? PRO/Wireless 3945 |A/B/G network adaptors |A/B/G network adaptors ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-10 20:35 EST ------- This bug should be closed now ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 01:48:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110148.l8B1mTh0016953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 21:48 EST ------- dbus python module is in dbus-python package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 01:44:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110144.l8B1iwuS016391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-10 21:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Should we choose the more restrictive one The one which is written in the > source code headers ? We must choose the "actual" license (i.e. we must judge the license from source code). In this case, the license is GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:03:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110303.l8B33gma007471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-10 23:03 EST ------- I've uploaded a new SRPM and spec: spec: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor.spec SRPM: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.src.rpm This addresses the issue of no documentation, most lines longer than 80 characters have been fixed, and the package builds under fedora-devel-i368. However, building is tied to the current Rawhide (7.91). I will provide a patch for 7.92 when it is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:16:09 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230096=5D_Review_Request=3A_iwl3945-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Intel=EF=BF=BD_PRO/Wireless_3945_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?A/B/G_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110316.l8B3G9eU030420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iwl3945-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 3945 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230096 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:14:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285551] New: Review Request: idw-gpl - Java Swing based docking windows framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285551 Summary: Review Request: idw-gpl - Java Swing based docking windows framework Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/idw-gpl/idw-gpl.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/idw-gpl/idw-gpl-1.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: InfoNode Docking Windows is a Java Swing based docking windows framework. It also includes a highly flexible tabbed panel component and a slim Swing look and feel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:21:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] New: Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fangqq at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: The Wen Quan Yi Unibit is designed as a dual-width (16x16,16x8) bitmap font to provide the most complete international symbol coverage, serving as the system-wide fall-back font. This font has covered 46362 Unicode code points in BMP as to Sep. 2007. It is indented to supersede the outdated GNU Unifont. This font was created by merging the latest update of GNU Unifont [GPL] (by Roman Czyborra and David Starner et al., the font was last updated in 2004??), WenQuanYi Bitmap Song [GPL] 0.8.1 (by Qianqian Fang and WenQuanYi contributors) and Fixed-16x8 [public domain] bitmap fonts from X11 core fonts. The entire CJK Unified Ideographics (U4E00-U9FA5) and CJK Unified Ideographics Extension A(U3400-U4DB5) blocks were replaced by high-quality glyphs from China National Standard GB19966-2005 (public domain). Near a thousand of non-CJK characters were improved by WenQuanYi contributors via their collaborative font editing website at http://wenq.org/eindex.cgi?Unicode_Chart_EN Note 1: I wrote the spec file based on wqy-bitmap-fonts (#230560) for FC5-F7, I built and tested the srpm/rpm on FC6, validated by rpmlint. If the new font mechanism is needed for F8, please let me know and I will write another spec file based on wqy-bitmap-fonts-f8. Note 2: the Hanzi blocks in GNU Unifont are neither complete nor optimized; this font will offer much better bitmap glyphs. A side-by-side comparison between the two fonts can be found at http://wenq.org/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=search&search=wqy-unibit Note 3: the naming of the package follows wqy's existing and coming fonts (wqy-zenhei will be uploaded soon): wqy-unibit, wqy-bitmap-fonts, wqy-zenhei and wqy-univec will all located under %{_datadir}/fonts/wenquanyi for easy management. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:27:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] New: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher-rpm/seekwatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/esandeen/seekwatcher-rpm/seekwatcher-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: Seekwatcher generates graphs from blktrace runs to help visualize IO patterns and performance. It can plot multiple blktrace runs together, making it easy to compare the differences between different benchmark runs. You should install the seekwatcher package if you need to visualize detailed information about IO patterns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:45:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110345.l8B3jh1l001867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-10 23:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xfsdump Updated Fedora Owners: esandeen at redhat.com (please remove cattelan at redhat.com - no such account anymore, cvs mail is bouncing, no other account in the fedora system yet) Also, if CC: doesn't have to be in the account system, please: Updated Fedora CC: cattelan at thebarn.com otherwise perhaps we can drop him until (if/when) he gets his fedora acct set up. Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 03:57:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110357.l8B3vWH2014744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-10 23:57 EST ------- Can we call it wqy-unibit-fonts? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 04:02:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110402.l8B429Vr004004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-11 00:02 EST ------- Thanks for the submission. > Note 1: I wrote the spec file based on wqy-bitmap-fonts > (#230560) for FC5-F7, I built and tested the srpm/rpm on > FC6, validated by rpmlint. If the new font > mechanism is needed for F8, please let me know and > I will write another spec file based on wqy-bitmap-fonts-f8. Usually the package is reviewed for devel (ie that would be F8 currently) so yes it would be better to use %catalogue and not chkfontpath. Also it is preferred that font packages do not explicitly require fontconfig, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 04:19:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] New: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/lohit-fonts/lohit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/lohit-fonts/lohit-fonts-2.1.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Hindi, Bengali, Gujarati, Punjabi, Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam, Oriya, Telugu TrueType/Opentype fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 04:47:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110447.l8B4ldmM021359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-11 00:47 EST ------- Thanks for your comments. I've removed .desktop file and icon file (was for an old version...) I've also splitted doc into a subpackage... New version URLs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank-3.5-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 04:57:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110457.l8B4vqJx022503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 00:57 EST ------- Hi Patrice, http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench-3.04-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110515.l8B5F5ug013410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:16:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110516.l8B5G8Rb013564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |285361 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-11 01:16 EST ------- Umm.. rebuild failed.. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=155082 This is due to bug 285361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110523.l8B5NhB5025592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-11 01:23 EST ------- I changed the package name to wqy-unibit-fonts, updated the spec file with F8-style commands, and bumped the version to 1.0.0-2. Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.0.0-2.src.rpm rpmlint complained about the symbol link, however I think those commands were recommended ones, so, I left as is. do you suggest dropping fontconfig from Requires? I am worrying that we have to remove the fc-cache lines from %post/%postun as well, and I don't know if fontconfig will see this font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110519.l8B5JYVt013738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-11 01:19 EST ------- Rahul, As mentioned in comment #5, it looks %doc is not added to SPEC. SHOULD: add doc files as %doc README COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:29:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110529.l8B5TgkI026229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-11 01:29 EST ------- This would seem to be a duplicate of bug 232358. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110539.l8B5dOMr016151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 01:39 EST ------- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/olpc-logos.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/olpc-logos-0.1-4.src.rpm There are a couple of warnings about missing documentation, unversioned provides and invalid license tags but they don't apply for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 05:49:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110549.l8B5nmGd017361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 01:49 EST ------- Parag, Fixed the docs http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench-3.04-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 06:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110624.l8B6OUM9032644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-11 02:24 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: zabbix Updated Fedora Owners: jwilson,sharkcz Updated EPEL Owners: jwilson,sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 06:25:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110625.l8B6PrvG000655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: wqy-unibit -|Review Request: wqy-unibit- |a dual-width bitmap font for|fonts - a dual-width bitmap |maximum unicode coverage |font for maximum unicode | |coverage ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-11 02:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I changed the package name to wqy-unibit-fonts, updated the spec file with > F8-style commands, and bumped the version to 1.0.0-2. Thanks for the update. :) > rpmlint complained about the symbol link, however I think those commands were > recommended ones, so, I left as is. wqy-unibit-fonts.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.0.0/README This would should be fixed IMHO. You could use iconv to do this if you want to keep the upstream encoding. wqy-unibit-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/wqy-unibit-fonts/wqy-unibit /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi/wqy-unibit Right this has been waived in other fonts packages, though IMHO it would not hurt to fix this too, but I do not take it as a blocker. :) > do you suggest dropping fontconfig from Requires? I am worrying that we have > to remove the fc-cache lines from %post/%postun as well, and I don't know if > fontconfig will see this font. No, just the calls to fc-cache should be conditionalized to check that fc-cache is available that is all. See the scriplets in the fonts section: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-4863fc4c93cec14292719d8901d83f5d90c3e477 Most installs normally have fontconfig anyway so it is not such a serious problem I think, but some server configurations might not say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 06:33:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249234] Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110633.l8B6Xhf7001514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mozilla Sunbird - Standalone calendar from the Mozilla Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249234 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-11 02:33 EST ------- * Tue Sep 11 2007 Aurelien Bompard 0.5-3 - minor spec cleanups - build the Lightning extension - add an option to build with official branding http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird.spec http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/sunbird/sunbird-0.5-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 06:34:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110634.l8B6YEax001579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-11 02:34 EST ------- > See the scriplets in the fonts section: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets (Sorry nevermind - I see you're already using those. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 06:52:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110652.l8B6qjbE024554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-11 02:52 EST ------- rpmlint output: lohit-fonts.src: E: no-changelogname-tag need a initial change entry explaining the package is derived from fonts-indic. lohit-fonts.src: W: invalid-license GPL License field needs to be updated, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing I guess it should be GPLv2. Unless we have some explicit font embedding exception? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 08:02:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110802.l8B82vNB001314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 04:02 EST ------- For redhat-logos, the latest version I found that was in redhat 8 (no redhat 9 on rpmbones), it was redhat-logos-1.1.6. Maybe obsoleting < 1.2.0 could be right and then providing 1.2.0. So I'll propose: Obsoletes: redhat-logos < 1.2.0 Provides: redhat-logos = 1.2.0 Unversionned obsolete is always bad since it prevents others to provide a package with the same name (here there is a trademark issue, though, but still it would be better). What about my comment: * Maybe the version should be set to 6.0.98 to match the fedora-logos version. Otherwise it cannot be installed along with a recent redhat-artwork. Are you sure that Conflicts: kdebase <= 3.1.5 Conflicts: anaconda-images <= 10 Conflicts: redhat-artwork <= 5.0.5 is right? I checked on rpmbones that none of them had the file which is also in that package. So in my opinion removing those obsoletes would be cleaner. All the other rpmlint issues seem ok to me. Regarding the license, I am a bit unsure about it. is it really 'All rights reserved.'? Does it mean that it cannot be redistributed at all? Is it really a restrictive license, or is there only a trademark? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 08:04:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110804.l8B84kYk001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-11 04:04 EST ------- Thanks all, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 08:35:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110835.l8B8ZHxH018040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2007-09-11 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Quick initial comments: > 1. Drop > Requires: flac >= 1.1.3 jack-audio-connection-kit >= 0.102.5 libmpcdec >= 1.2.2 > alsa-lib taglib qt4 >= 4.2 > rpm should auto-req these without listing them explicitly. I've already dropped dependencies on libogg etc., as suggested, but those left were not mentioned by rpmlint and I did not "just try" ... > 2. wrt desktop-file-install usage, drop > --add-category X-Fedora --add-category X-Red-Hat-Extra > see also: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 "X-Fedora" comes from investigating the other packages ... "X-Red-Hat-Extra" comes from the documentation: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/developers-guide/ch-menus.html#s1-categories if this is no longer valid then it should be updated Spec URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp.spec (overwritten with new version) SRPM URL: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp-0.1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 08:36:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110836.l8B8aMcr006292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-11 04:36 EST ------- Just confirming Ewan's statement, we'll stay with "gimp-" where the package is only an extension of GIMP. Packages that have other functionality usable without GIMP can name their plugin subpackages "-gimp". If we at some point see that this results in a naming chaos, we'll revisit this issue. Xavier, my question was rather if Ewan is good to go forward with this package, i.e. if it reviews successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 08:38:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110838.l8B8cqkY006418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-11 04:38 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. efd0c958da79c1cd941ecd3f63e637ae dbench-3.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package -> dbench-3.04-4.fc8 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 08:53:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 04:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110853.l8B8rNrm008417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 04:53 EST ------- Using dbench_version instead of a plain %{version} seems strange to me but not a blocker. BuildRequires: glibc-headers is unusefull (and may be harmful if the split change), it should be in every build root. In my opinion this is a blocker. I would modify the %description like this (only a suggestion): Dbench is a file system benchmark that generates load patterns similar to those of the commercial Netbench benchmark. No other comments from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:10:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110910.l8B9Anmr010985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-11 05:10 EST ------- I've fixed everything but the external->internal flac; it seems like they've nailed the version to 1.1.2 since there is a major change in the flac macro API in 1.1.3. I've already started a port to 1.1.4 but need some more spare time for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:12:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110912.l8B9Cevm011093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 05:12 EST ------- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/olpc-logos.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/olpc-logos-0.1-5.src.rpm I have added versioned provides as suggested. I think the conflicts were added just to make sure we weren't including unnecessary packages. I have dropped them. I haven't bumped up the version since this package isn't meant to be installed in parallel with version of redhat-artwork package. OLPC doesn't. The license afaik is reserved because of the trademarked image. I will confirm this with the team members later. Just as a confirmation, we won't be including this package in Fedora ever other than the OLPC branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:17:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110917.l8B9HxS7011887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 05:17 EST ------- I add this here since it was discussed above. I just commited changes in texi2html cvs (no need to backport, will be in the next release), to fix handling of @math, and it happens that with latex2html, the result cannot be correct, since mixing of @-commands and tex commands is allowed in @math, so something like @math{@var{\phi}} is right, but badly interpreted by latex2html, while with tex4ht the result is now right (since it now uses httexi for @math and httex for @tex). In my opinion this is a good reason to have a tex4ht dependency. What is your advice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110917.l8B9HWuZ011836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-11 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Using dbench_version instead of a plain %{version} > seems strange to me but not a blocker. > > BuildRequires: glibc-headers > is unusefull (and may be harmful if the split change), > it should be in every build root. In my opinion this is > a blocker. > yes. you are right. Thought its needed as BR. But mock built successfully without this BR. > I would modify the %description like this (only a > suggestion): > > Dbench is a file system benchmark that generates load patterns similar > to those of the commercial Netbench benchmark. > > > No other comments from me. Rahul, Can you please resubmit new SRPM links for review? Or you can do this at initial package import time also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:22:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110922.l8B9MsM5012587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 05:22 EST ------- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench-3.04-5.src.rpm Here you go. Fixed version macro. This was just a left over from before this package was split from olpc-utils. Dropped BR on glibc-headers. The description is left as it was since it makes abstract metadata searching easier and matches the OpenSUSE spec description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:28:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110928.l8B9SD8S024771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-11 05:28 EST ------- For me it looks ok now. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:25:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110925.l8B9PG3l024546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 05:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/olpc-logos.spec > http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/olpc-logos-0.1-5.src.rpm > > I have added versioned provides as suggested. I think the conflicts were added > just to make sure we weren't including unnecessary packages. I have dropped them. No, I think the conflicts were introduced because files from these packages were moved to fedora-logos or redhat-logos, so conflicts has to be added since there is no dependency but incompatibility only. Therefore it is not relevant for olpc. > I haven't bumped up the version since this package isn't meant to be installed > in parallel with version of redhat-artwork package. OLPC doesn't. Yes, but think about people wanting to install in a chroot, test adding other stuff to olpc clone and so on and so forth. In my opinion it is better if things are consistent in olpc and fedora. This is not a blocker in any case. > The license afaik is reserved because of the trademarked image. I will confirm > this with the team members later. Just as a confirmation, we won't be including > this package in Fedora ever other than the OLPC branch. Of course, and this is now documented in the spec file. However it seems to me that the terms of licensing of the package should be clearer, in my opinion it is confusing to use a restricted copyright license for a trademark protection. Otherwise said, it should be possible for a user to know what he can and can't do with this package, this isn't the case currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:30:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110930.l8B9UwC4013851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 05:30 EST ------- %define %version 3.04 at the beginning is wrong. Remove it and it is right for me. You can do it post-commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:34:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110934.l8B9YbUk025576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-11 05:34 EST ------- Hi Patrice, feel free to add the tex4ht dependency when the result with tex4ht is right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:43:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110943.l8B9hnFp026961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 05:43 EST ------- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/dbench-3.04-6.src.rpm Drop the dumb redundant version info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:43:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226487] Merge Review: texi2html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110943.l8B9hamB015245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texi2html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226487 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 05:43 EST ------- Ok, I'll do it for the texi2html release. I prefer doing it later with post-texlive tex4ht in order to have the right name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:48:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110948.l8B9mXU6027716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 05:48 EST ------- Also approved for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:48:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110948.l8B9mH28015923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 05:48 EST ------- OLPC logos isn't going to be bumped in parallel for new Fedora releases. I am not sure it makes sense to do it now unless it is going to continuously maintained that way. The interaction between trademark and copyright is a complex topic and I don't want to change the license info on my own without confirmation from others involved. Anything else left besides this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 09:57:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709110957.l8B9v6kX017226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-11 05:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > OLPC logos isn't going to be bumped in parallel for new Fedora releases. I am > not sure it makes sense to do it now unless it is going to continuously > maintained that way. fine for me. > The interaction between trademark and copyright is a complex topic and I don't > want to change the license info on my own without confirmation from others > involved. Anything else left besides this? Nothing else left. I understand that the olpc-logos is specific with regard with license and trademark, and I am ok with any kind of license and trademark, it is just that it should be clear what the terms are. If you are in a hurry you can consider this approved, although I would have preferred to have clear terms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 10:01:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111001.l8BA16eV029699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 06:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dbench Short Description: Filesystem load benchmarking tool Owners: sundaram,johnp Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2. InitialCC: sundaram,johnp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 10:06:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111006.l8BA6gHj030419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 06:06 EST ------- I will follow up on this and fix the spec file licensing tag and related information if needed. For now I am applying to get this built since this is one of the last packages waiting for the entire OLPC to move to using Fedora infrastructure. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 10:09:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111009.l8BA9JQx030578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-11 06:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: olpc-logos Short Description: OLPC-related icons and pictures Owners: sundaram,johnp Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: sundaram,johnp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 10:17:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111017.l8BAHE9U019721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-11 06:17 EST ------- Updated the files with the required changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 12:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] New: Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 Summary: Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: snecklifter at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/simias/simias.spec SRPM URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/simias/simias-1.6-1.20070907svn.src.rpm Description: Simias is a technology that will allow various types of data to be stored and related in what is known as a collection. Initially Simias is the underlying data store for the iFolder project, although it has potential to do much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 12:32:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111232.l8BCWArC004180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 13:17:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111317.l8BDHguY010548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-11 09:17 EST ------- Only these problems stayed: E: groff zero-length /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/tmac/mm/locale E: groff zero-length /usr/share/groff/1.18.1.4/tmac/mm/se_locale I can't remove these files, because they are needed for the correct functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 13:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111322.l8BDMB3g011309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-11 09:22 EST ------- # -doc subpackage: Requires should entail %{release} Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 13:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253749] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111352.l8BDqRC3027590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253749 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-11 09:52 EST ------- === REQUIRED ITEMS === [ OK ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ OK ] Spec file name must match the base package name. [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [ OK ] Package successfully builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture [NOARCH package]. [ CHECK ] Tested on: koji from scratch [F-devel] [ OK ] Package is not relocatable. [ OK ] Buildroot is correct [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license. [ Ok ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [ OK ] License type: LGPL [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s). [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. [ CHECK ] The spec file handles locales properly. [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [ OK ] Package must own all directories that it creates. [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [ Ok ] Permissions on files are set properly. [ OK ] Package has a %clean section. [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros. [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content. [ CHECK ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [ OK ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [ SKIP ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [ SKIP ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file. [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [ Ok ] pear scriptlets are present and correct. Okay this package sounds clean ;) ========== *APPROVED* ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 15:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111501.l8BF1Bji027093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-11 11:01 EST ------- Here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava-0.9.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Is a new version fixing a rather major packaging bug: * Tue Sep 11 2007 Hans de Goede 0.9.1-2 - Dynamically determine gcc include path instead of hardcoding it, so that sdljava will build on other setups then devel-x86_64 too (oops). And also cleaning up the description per comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 15:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111519.l8BFJepF029808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-11 11:19 EST ------- Hello, once again, the last message from rpmlint is: E: iproute nly-non-binary-in-usr-lib but I can't fix it without upstream. I ask them about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 15:26:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111526.l8BFQUnj031179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-11 11:26 EST ------- So, yeah. Anything else? If the package looks basically good/clean, I'm eager to get it in and work on further improvements from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 15:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111529.l8BFTFuC011513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-11 11:29 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/php-pear-creole.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/php-pear-creole-1.1.0-5.fc7.src.rpm Changes: - proper php-pear requirement - changed php-channel requirement syntax - rectified file ownership Shall I nail the pear version requirement to < 1.5.4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111608.l8BG8htW017297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|285361 | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-11 12:08 EST ------- For me almost okay, except for 2 issues. * For the line (in %prep) ----------------------------------------------------- export CFLAGS="%{optflags} -I%{_libdir}/gcc/*-redhat-linux-gnu/include/" sed -i "s|@GUILE_CAIRO_CFLAGS@|@GUILE_CAIRO_CFLAGS@ -I%{_libdir}/gcc/*-redhat-linux-gnu/include/|" gtk/gnome/gw/Makefile.in ----------------------------------------------------- - Well, my system does not have any directory which matches %_libdir/gcc/*-redhat-linux-gnu so these two lines can be removed * rpmlint - rpmlint for installed -devel package complains about undefined-non-weak-symbol. -------------------------------------------------------- guile-gnome-platform.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguile-gnome-corba-0.so.0.0.0 TC_CORBA_sequence_CORBA_any_struct guile-gnome-platform.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguile-gnome-corba-0.so.0.0.0 TC_null_struct (and so many lines) -------------------------------------------------------- Linking of libguile-gnome-corba-0.so against libORBit-2.so and libbonobo-2.so is missing. For a brief solution, adding -------------------------------------------------------- export LDFLAGS="-lORBit-2 -lbonobo-2" -------------------------------------------------------- before %configure fixes this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:04:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111604.l8BG4rcC004827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 ------- Additional Comments From marduk at k-d-w.org 2007-09-11 12:04 EST ------- Although, I was able to fix the issue Jason reported I came across some other problems. I didn't have time to work on this project for quite some time. I think best is to drop this request. I request inclusion again if I'm more comfortable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:10:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111610.l8BGAR5V006091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-11 12:10 EST ------- Reviewed the revised package/spec: - confirmed that the missing %doc and the long lines issues have been fixed - managed to build in mock under fedora-devel-i368: $ mock -r fedora-devel-i386.cfg condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while unpack cache setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ cd /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ ls -alF total 37968 drwxr-sr-x 2 nsantos mock 4096 Sep 11 11:53 ./ drwxr-sr-x 5 nsantos mock 4096 Sep 11 11:41 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 881599 Sep 11 11:53 build.log -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 22186503 Sep 11 11:53 condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 14988562 Sep 11 11:45 condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 2506 Sep 11 11:53 condor-debuginfo-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 719184 Sep 11 11:53 condor-devel-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 165 Sep 11 11:41 mockconfig.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 17190 Sep 11 11:53 root.log Confirmation of requires/provides: $ for i in `ls *.rpm`; do echo; echo $i; echo "Provides:" ; rpm -qp $i --provides; echo "Requires:"; rpm -qp $i --requires; done condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm Provides: config(condor) = 6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs perl(Condor) perl(Execute) = 1.00 perl(FileLock) = 1.01 condor = 6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/perl config(condor) = 6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs krb5-libs libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcom_err.so.2 libcrypt.so.1 libcrypto.so.6 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libk5crypto.so.3 libk5crypto.so.3(k5crypto_3_MIT) libkrb5.so.3 libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libpcre.so.0 libpq.so.5 libresolv.so.2 libssl.so.6 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) mailx openssl pcre perl >= 0:5.003 perl >= 1:5.0 perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(English) perl(Execute) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(FileHandle) perl(FileLock) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(warnings) postgresql-libs rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) shadow-utils condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.src.rpm Provides: (none) Requires: imake flex byacc tcsh pcre-devel postgresql-devel openssl-devel krb5-devel bind-utils rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 condor-debuginfo-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm Provides: condor-debuginfo = 6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs Requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 condor-devel-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm Provides: libcondorapi.so condor-devel = 6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs Requires: condor = 6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Here are the rpmlint results, please fix or justify as appropriate (ignoring the license-related ones for now): $ for i in `ls *.rpm`; do echo; echo $i; rpmlint $i; done condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/execute condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor/execute condor E: condor non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/condor/execute 01777 E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/log condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor/log condor E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/spool condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor/spool condor W: condor invalid-license Condor Public License condor-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.src.rpm W: condor invalid-license Condor Public License condor-debuginfo-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm E: condor-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package W: condor-debuginfo invalid-license Condor Public License condor-devel-6.9.5-0.2.20070907cvs.i386.rpm W: condor-devel invalid-license Condor Public License W: condor-devel unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libcondorapi.so W: condor-devel no-soname /usr/lib/libcondorapi.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:16:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111616.l8BGGKeS018891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-11 12:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:19:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244911] Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111619.l8BGJpMh019351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpc-logos - olpc-related icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244911 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-11 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198562] Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111623.l8BGNTAn007997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zabbix - Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198562 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-11 12:23 EST ------- This request appears to have already been done via the web interface. Feel free to reset the flag if further cvsadmin attention is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 16:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201779] Review Request: xfsdump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111627.l8BGRXkd008878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfsdump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201779 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-11 12:27 EST ------- cvs done. cattelan has to be in the account system to be in packagedb to be listed in CC for the package. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 17:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] New: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mlichvar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mlichvar/tmp/tack.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mlichvar/tmp/tack-1.06-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The tack program has three purposes: to help you build a new terminfo entry describing an unknown terminal, to test the correctness of an existing entry, and to develop the correct pad timings needed to ensure that screen updates don't fall behind the incoming data stream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 17:29:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111729.l8BHT7Ff030950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |282511 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 17:32:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111732.l8BHWvkE031602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 17:32:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228159] Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111732.l8BHWZD7031516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new-stuff-manager - program that runs in the background and downloads/installs plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228159 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-11 13:32 EST ------- Well, then please feel free to request a new review request when you have time, thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 17:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253910] Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111739.l8BHdNFo032740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksirk - Turnbased multiplayer board strategy game (conquer the world!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253910 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-11 13:39 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:04:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111804.l8BI4VoP004719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-11 14:04 EST ------- Ok, fixed. New URLs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank-3.5-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:07:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111807.l8BI7CdB025180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-11 14:07 EST ------- * Fixed dbus python and pygtk2-libglade dependencies * Koji build succesful for dist-fc7 see here for log : [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=155635] * However dist-f8 fails with following error :- var/tmp/straw-0.27-4-F13608/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/straw/constants.py:libdir = os.path.normpath('/var/tmp/straw-0.27-4-F13608/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/straw') Found '/var/tmp/straw-0.27-4-F13608' in installed files; aborting error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65277 (%install) Tried to fix it with the following sed -i -e "s@${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}@@" constants.py.in But of no avail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:15:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111815.l8BIFT0k006983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-11 14:15 EST ------- > Shall I nail the pear version requirement to < 1.5.4? No. Bug #283401 is closed (pear 1.6.2 pushed in rawhide) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:18:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253749] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111818.l8BIIJxt007268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253749 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-11 14:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect Short Description: Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select Owners: remi Branches: devel, F-7, FC6, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] New: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/slingshot/slingshot.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/slingshot/slingshot-0.8.1p-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Slingshot is a two dimensional, turn based simulation-strategy game set in the gravity fields of several planets. It is a highly addictive game, and never the same from round to round due to its randomly generated playing fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111840.l8BIeL6S011788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-11 14:40 EST ------- SPEC: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/guile-gnome-platform/guile-gnome-platform.spec SRPM: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/laxathom/task_155605/guile-gnome-platform-2.15.93-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:46:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111846.l8BIk5x6000646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-11 14:46 EST ------- Also okay from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:52:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111852.l8BIqXdw013939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-09-11 14:52 EST ------- I thought they can be omitted in both sections. Thanks for point it out. I saw your thread on the mailing list and hopefully some generic provider will be added in some future version of Fedora. I added a note in description about required console web browser. Updated version: Spec URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5.spec SRPM URL: http://timeoff.wsisiz.edu.pl/rpms/gt5/gt5-1.4.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 18:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111855.l8BItbse002401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-11 14:55 EST ------- Shall we exchange reviews again? As usual pick any of mine from the Games SIG page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 19:02:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] New: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steved at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/libgssglue/libgssglue.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/libgssglue/libgssglue-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Rename library from libgssapi to libgssglue to resolve conflicts with Heimdal and MIT libraries named libgssapi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 19:07:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111907.l8BJ74gs004341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 19:21:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111921.l8BJLgfi019415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-11 15:21 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru. Note: ownership on ORBit-2 need to be fix before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guile-gnome-platform Short Description: Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack Owners: lxtnow at gmail.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Devel InitialCC: cvsextras commit: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 19:30:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709111930.l8BJUPtS015888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-11 15:30 EST ------- hm... could you or upstream explain about the version of this package, i can see that its archived with version 3.0 and have an diretory with version 1.0. AFAIK, a sourcetarball is not shipped without version in .tar.gz format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 20:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] New: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.2.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Kaya is a compiled statically typed (ie, types are checked at compile time) imperative programming language; unlike other such languages, however, types are inferred rather than declared - there is no need for type declarations of local variables. Kaya has "tagged union" data structures, a powerful feature more commonly found in functional languages such as Ocaml and Haskell. Known Issues: - Rpmlint complaints the *.h files in %{_libdir}/kaya. But they have to be on this location for proper compilation of kaya programms. - The package could not build on ppc64, because there is is ghc on this platform. Please refe to BZ #239713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 21:55:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709112155.l8BLtg2i007339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-11 17:55 EST ------- Fully reviewed, all MUST items passed, and it works fine on x86_64 and seems like a good way to waist some time :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 21:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709112154.l8BLsCI6006785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-11 17:54 EST ------- rpmlint -i on SRPM: Io-language.src: W: strange-permission AddonBuilder_io_libdir.patch 0660 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Io-language.src: W: strange-permission Io-language.spec 0660 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. rpmlint -i on RPMS: Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SqlDatabase/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/NotificationCenter/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/ContinuedFraction/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/BigNum/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/User/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SqlDatabase/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/AsyncRequest/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/MD5/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/BigNum/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Regex/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Libxml2/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Random/build.io Io-language.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/Io-language-20070710/guide.pages/.typeAttributes.dict The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/Io-language-20070710/guide.pages/.typeAttributes.dict Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Flux/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/CGI/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Random/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/NotificationCenter/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SQLite3/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Curses/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Syslog/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Zlib/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/ContinuedFraction/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Libxml2/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Range/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/AsyncRequest/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Thread/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/User/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Fnmatch/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SQLite3/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/UUID/build.io Io-language.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/Io-language-20070710/guide_files/.htmle The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/Io-language-20070710/guide_files/.htmle Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SystemCall/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Rational/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/UUID/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Rational/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SHA1/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/MD5/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Regex/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Blowfish/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Fnmatch/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SHA1/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Box/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Syslog/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Loki/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/LZO/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Loki/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Zlib/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/LZO/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Range/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Box/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/CGI/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SystemCall/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Blowfish/depends Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Thread/build.io Io-language.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Curses/build.io Io-language-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Io-language-extras.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SoundTouch/build.io Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SampleRateConverter/build.io Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Socket/depends Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SoundTouch/depends Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Python/depends Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/SampleRateConverter/depends Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Socket/build.io Io-language-extras.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Python/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/TagLib/depends Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Image/depends Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Font/depends Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/PortAudio/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/LibSndFile/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Image/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Font/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/PortAudio/depends Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/OpenGL/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/TagLib/build.io Io-language-graphics-and-sound.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/LibSndFile/depends Io-language-mysql.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Io-language-mysql.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/MySQL/build.io Io-language-mysql.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/MySQL/depends Io-language-postgresql.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Io-language-postgresql.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/PostgreSQL/build.io Io-language-postgresql.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Postgres/build.io Io-language-postgresql.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/PostgreSQL/depends Io-language-postgresql.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/io/addons/Postgres/depends ----------- Is there really no documentation for some of these packages? No problem if there isn't, just checking. Also, the Source URL is 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 22:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709112209.l8BM95bP008976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-11 18:09 EST ------- Thanks much. I was afraid you'd never finish the review if you played it. I'm amazed I was able to break away long enough to package the thing. :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slingshot Short Description: A Newtonian strategy game Owners: limb Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 22:13:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709112213.l8BMDHJY013687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-11 18:13 EST ------- I've spoken with Willy (the author of haproxy) a few times recently, he has a patch to replace all the O'Reilly code and with appropriately licensed code. He is now testing it. When that release comes out, I'll package up that vesion and then the licensing issue will be moot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 11 22:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709112243.l8BMhQwj013545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-11 18:43 EST ------- rpmlint on my FC6 did not give the "file-not-utf8" warning. Anyway, I checked the README file, the only place could be no-ascii is the copyright symbol at the header of the file. I removed the symbol and recompiled the rpm, the new spec/srpm can be found at Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.0.0-3.src.rpm can you help me check if this solves the not-utf8 issue? if it does, I will update the upstream file to match the checksum (I know normally it goes the other way around). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 00:08:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120008.l8C082Nj028428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |237575 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-11 20:08 EST ------- After some amusing hours of gdb debugging I've figured out that libzzub also relies on libsndfile for the actual loading of flac files, but since it is linked against our (Fedora's) libsndfile that has no flac support (see bug 237575), we have to wait for that bug to be fixed. Tomorrow I'm going to post the new spec/srpms including my flac patch anyway, so far the lib works well (tested with aldrin). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 00:22:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120022.l8C0MlGU030869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-09-11 20:22 EST ------- * missing "BuildRequires: cmake" * not building with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS / %{optflags} (run make VERBOSE=1 to see) * hint: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake * licence seems to be GPLv2+ source files contain the "or any later version" phrase) * build failed here due to SMP make flags: ... [ 24%] Building CXX object lib/CMakeFiles/qmmp.dir/moc_iir.o /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lqmmp collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [lib/qmmp/Input/vorbis/libvorbis.so] Error 1 make[1]: *** [lib/qmmp/Input/vorbis/CMakeFiles/vorbis.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... * dropping the %{_smp_mflags} make the build-job succeed * GPLv2 text is not included! (only compiled in) * shared libraries are not chmod +x * rpmlint qmmp-0.1.4-2.fc8.i386.rpm qmmp.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libqmmp.so libqmmp.so => acceptable during development, but it requires strictly versioned "Requires" in plugin packages * package provides SONAMEs it must not provide except for "libqmmp.so": $ rpm -qp --provides qmmp-0.1.4-2.fc8.i386.rpm | grep lib libalsa.so libflac.so libjack.so libmpc.so libqmmp.so libvorbis.so The others come from the plugin libraries. It is highly recommended to filter them out as not to disturb what legitimate library packages provide/require. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 00:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120024.l8C0Osub031080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |237575 OtherBugsDependingO|237575 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 00:36:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120036.l8C0aNCg000598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From jafo at tummy.com 2007-09-11 20:36 EST ------- I hope to get to it this week. Sorry, I've been swamped but it's on my list to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 00:51:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120051.l8C0pdD9032060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-09-11 20:51 EST ------- Why does the package include a copy of FreeSansBold.ttf instead of requiring freefont and using the file in there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 00:58:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120058.l8C0wUAC009503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-11 20:58 EST ------- Good question. I didn't know it was already included. Would it be better to replace the included copy with a Requires: and a symlink? Or, instead of a symlink, I could patch the slingshot.py. Which is preferred? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 01:47:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120147.l8C1lXc0015431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2007-09-11 21:47 EST ------- Well, patching will use up one less inode on the disk and save a bit of space in the package. Other than that I don't think it really matters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 01:54:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120154.l8C1s1te016208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-11 21:54 EST ------- A new SRPM and spec (same url as before) are available: SRPM: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor-6.9.5-0.3.20070907cvs.src.rpm The unstripped-binary-or-object and no-soname warnings have been removed by removing the libcondorapi.so in favor of the libcondorapi.a, which I've been told by upstream is what people use anyway. This means the -devel package has actually been replaced with a -static package. After looking through the maze of pages about users and groups (including the user registry) it appears that user creation is acceptable when accompanied by a good reason. For this case, the condor user owns all the daemons run in the condor system and the files under /var/lib/condor, which includes files associated with jobs that are sent to a machine for execution. It is desirable to have a known owner for all such files. The permissions on /var/lib/condor/execute are intentional as it is a world writeable directory and it is desirable to take advantage of restricted deletion (sticky bit). Also, the empty debuginfo package has been fixed by using unstripped binaries for the primary package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 02:04:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287191] New: Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache authentication for the CAS Single Sign-On service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287191 Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache authentication for the CAS Single Sign-On service Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: joshkel at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.jbc.edu/~josh/mod_auth_cas.spec SRPM URL: http://www.jbc.edu/~josh/mod_auth_cas-1.0-1.c5.src.rpm Description: mod_auth_cas is an Apache 2.0/2.2 compliant module that supports the CASv1 and CASv2 protocols. The purpose of this module is to allow an Apache web server to interact with an authentication server that conforms to the CAS version 1 or 2 protocol as specified by Yale/JA-SIG. This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 02:17:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120217.l8C2Hafj010456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-11 22:17 EST ------- Complete. It will be imported with that change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 03:03:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217484] Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120303.l8C33mCZ017332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-11 23:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rlwrap New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 03:07:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215267] Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120307.l8C37ARl018042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 03:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215267] Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120306.l8C36lbl018013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-11 23:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: Django New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 04:12:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120412.l8C4CueI002370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|fedora_contrib | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 04:16:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120416.l8C4GIsS002983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 05:03:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120503.l8C53LKx031962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 01:03 EST ------- Preliminary review:- 1) Change Buildroot tag mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 2) Chane License tag 3) Check rpmlint output on all rpms. 4) drop prefix in configure command. 5) should not use makeinstall macro http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 05:07:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120507.l8C570xW032642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 01:06 EST ------- Also, you can add license file to %doc. Remove .a and .la files. Check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 05:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120518.l8C5IKXB009988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 05:35:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120535.l8C5ZYED012558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 01:35 EST ------- But are other things got updated in SPEC file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 05:40:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120540.l8C5eXEw004282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 01:40 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 8c1e0aa72c189781499cbe96b66bb4f5 tack-1.06.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + tack-1.06-1.fc8 package -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libncurses.so.5 libtic.so.5 libtinfo.so.5 ncurses >= 5.6-3.20070203 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 06:09:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120609.l8C691GH016247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora candyz0416 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From candyz0416 at gmail.com 2007-09-12 02:09 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gcin New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 06:29:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120629.l8C6TXp9018444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 02:29 EST ------- Also: * Remove static archives or move them to new subpackage * Don't use PreReq * Requires(postun/pre) /sbin/ldconfig can be removed. * Support parallel make when possible, otherwise comment in the spec file that this package cannot support parallel make. * Add "-p" option to "install" commant to keep timestamps * Use macros. /etc should be %_sysconfdir, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 07:07:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120707.l8C77VCD022988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-12 03:07 EST ------- Yes, the spec file was updatet therefore no other problems than this one (#4) is occuring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 08:44:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120844.l8C8i3Q7003256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 04:44 EST ------- thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 08:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120854.l8C8seOD028424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2007-09-12 04:54 EST ------- Any news about it? The CDuce team has released a version compatible with OCaml 3.10 three months ago -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 09:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120901.l8C91ane005740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-12 05:01 EST ------- Ping? Would somebody please be so kind to review this? It blocks me from being able to upgrade perl-Test-Inline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 09:16:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120916.l8C9GNjU007878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 05:16 EST ------- 1)any reason to use (pre) with BuildRequires? 2)Use macro usage. It is not consistent. check more at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 09:43:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120943.l8C9hPqB011549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-09-12 05:43 EST ------- I'll take a look, but it is an issue of spare time at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 09:48:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709120948.l8C9mKvl012205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 05:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=193321) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=193321&action=view) update SPEC You may like to test attached SPEC as it may solve rpmlint error. Just a suggestion. Can you check functionality of your package it this solves problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 10:19:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] New: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode-2.0.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: KBarcode is a barcode and label printing application for Linux and KDE 3. It can be used to print every thing from simple business cards up to complex labels with several barcodes (e.g. article descriptions). KBarcode comes with an easy to use WYSIWYG label designer, a setup wizard, batch import of labels (directly from the delivery note), thousands of predefined labels, database managment tools and translations in many languages. Even printing more than 10.000 labels in one go is no problem for KBarcode. Additionally it is a simply xbarcode replacement for the creation of barcodes. All major types of barcodes like EAN, UPC, CODE39 and ISBN are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 10:31:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121031.l8CAVsSv017441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-12 06:31 EST ------- I made the final changes in spec file. I added smp flags and use macros. #9 I don't want do these changes. It's upstream thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 10:45:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121045.l8CAjp8K019139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 06:45 EST ------- I like to review this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 10:44:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121044.l8CAit8s018743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 06:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > I made the final changes in spec file. I added smp flags and use macros. > > #9 I don't want do these changes. It's upstream thing. And why you would like to see non binary files being installed in /usr/lib. I checked F-7 version and saw that in that version we have q_netem.so file and its valid to have that being installed in /usr/lib. But now I saw its no longer part of new devel version, thus no use to have other files installed at location /usr/lib/tc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 10:45:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121045.l8CAjUFq010913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 10:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121052.l8CAqmqe019901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 06:52 EST ------- missing BR: pcre-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:08:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121108.l8CB8SfV013325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-12 07:08 EST ------- Fixed. Check it again Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode-2.0.5-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121113.l8CBD8k6013935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:13 EST ------- Ping? Matt, still around? :-) Please go ahead and request CVS branches creation, import, build, and close ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121117.l8CBH65l022954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bluez-libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:17 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:16:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121116.l8CBGxgt022941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:16 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:16:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225241] Merge Review: alsa-lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121116.l8CBGjYu014540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225241 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:16 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225632] Merge Review: byacc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121117.l8CBHspt014588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: byacc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225632 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:17 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. Maybe the version update could be skipped because of the feature freeze, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:23:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121123.l8CBN0F2023694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdparanoia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:23 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. If you'd like a co-maintainer for this package, also just let me know, I'd be interested. It could also be interesting to get the latest 10pre version during the Fedora 9 development for it to get some more testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225634] Merge Review: cadaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121123.l8CBNjw6015308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cadaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225634 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:23 EST ------- Test build went fine, resulting binary is fine. You could remove the obsolete "cadaver-0.22.5.tar.gz.asc" from CVS, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:24:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226000] Merge Review: libdv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121124.l8CBOMdE023852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libdv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226000 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:24 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121124.l8CBOrol015410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:24 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:24:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121124.l8CBOXZs015378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 07:24 EST ------- Ping? It would be nice to get this package cleaned up for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:30:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121130.l8CBUuI4024822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2007-09-12 07:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > * missing "BuildRequires: cmake" oops, originally I used qmake and I forgot to add cmake later ... - fixed > * not building with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS / %{optflags} > (run make VERBOSE=1 to see) - it should be fixed by using %cmake macro (?) > * licence seems to be GPLv2+ > source files contain the "or any later version" phrase) you are right; I was confused by some web and did not look into the sources - fixed > * build failed here due to SMP make flags: I use -j3 (dualcore Xeon) and it works_for_me(tm) - do you have any idea why the error happens? I am not a programmer, it would take me ages to figure it out (especially when I cannot reproduce) :-( > * GPLv2 text is not included! (only compiled in) - fixed (added COPYING to %doc) > * shared libraries are not chmod +x - fixed > * rpmlint qmmp-0.1.4-2.fc8.i386.rpm > qmmp.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libqmmp.so libqmmp.so > => acceptable during development, but it requires strictly > versioned "Requires" in plugin packages I guess this is upstream problem? - should I rename the library somehow and make a symlink at the end of %install? > * package provides SONAMEs it must not provide except > for "libqmmp.so": - fixed new SRPM: http://sn.bluehost.cz/tmp/no-mp3/qmmp-0.1.4-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:33:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121133.l8CBXAMj016557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-12 07:33 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 11:34:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121134.l8CBYUHl016639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2007-09-12 07:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tack Short Description: Terminfo action checker Owners: mlichvar Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 12:02:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121202.l8CC2tw1028574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-12 08:02 EST ------- Should I remove the COPYING as it conflict with what is said within the source code ? Does I need also to add thr right COPYING file ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 12:16:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121216.l8CCGvxN022041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-12 08:16 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/libzzub-0.2.3-4.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - fixed double source definition - adapted modified source tarball w/ mp3 support removed - added patch to use internal flac support - removed INSTALL from %doc - removed explicit python requirement - replaced static rm commands with macros The internal flac patch actually ports libzzub to flac 1.1.4 and links to Fedora's supplied version but we still have to wait for 237575 to be fixed first, so long flac support is unavailable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 12:41:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121241.l8CCfuhm025301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - Libraries for animorph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 08:41 EST ------- The original COPYING file can be removed and I don't think we have to add the right license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 12:40:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121240.l8CCe1Ru025016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-12 08:40 EST ------- mock build gave me error as desktop-file-install --vendor= --dir /var/tmp/kbarcode-2.0.5-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/kde --add-category Application --add-category Utility --add-category X-KDE-Utilities-File --add-category X-Fedora kbarcode/kbarcode-label.desktop kbarcode/kbarcode-label.desktop: key "MimeType" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing /var/tmp/kbarcode-2.0.5-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/kde/kbarcode-label.desktop: error: key "MimeType" is present in group "Desktop Entry", but the type is "MimeType" while this key is only valid for type "Application" /var/tmp/kbarcode-2.0.5-2.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/kde/kbarcode-label.desktop: error: key "Categories" is present in group "Desktop Entry", but the type is "MimeType" while this key is only valid for type "Application" desktop-file-install created an invalid desktop file! ===> drop following lines used while installing desktop files --add-category "Application" \ --add-category "X-KDE-Utilities-File" \ --add-category "X-Fedora" \ For more information check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles and http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:00:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121300.l8CD064K028490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: animorph - |Review Request: animorph - |Libraries for animorph |3D Animation and Morph | |Library ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-12 09:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/animorph.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/animorph-0.2-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: 3D Animation and Morph Library %changelog - Change license to GPLv2+ as said in the source code - Remove BR glibc-headers - Change summary (taken from animorph.pc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:26:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218556] Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121326.l8CDQDNg008011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecryptfs-utils - Linux eCryptfs utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218556 rpacheco at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|227583 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:28:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121328.l8CDSpAT008301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-12 09:28 EST ------- Reopening. Here are some new packages: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-valgrind-session/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:25:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121325.l8CDPn6a001135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-12 09:25 EST ------- Desktop file install fixed Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode-2.0.5-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:32:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121332.l8CDWkOA009093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-12 09:32 EST ------- Not fixed. I will update it soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121329.l8CDTu92008538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-12 09:29 EST ------- Wrt to the license question, "Public Domain" is a valid license according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:43:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121343.l8CDhGIC004166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 09:43 EST ------- Just to confirm: do you want to stop this review request until bug 237575 is resolved? Or we can proceed this review and you can import this package into Fedora (if I approve this) even if bug 237575 is not fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121346.l8CDkJ9k011247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-12 09:46 EST ------- O'Reilly responded to the FSF and claimed to be in the process of changing the license on that code to a "BSD-ish" license, but so far, this has not occurred. Even though it may be moot, I figured I would pass it along. I've sent another email to O'Reilly asking them to actually make this licensing change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:48:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226000] Merge Review: libdv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121348.l8CDmHHv004888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libdv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226000 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-09-12 09:48 EST ------- libdv-1.0.0-2.fc8 built with all suggested updates and a few other minor spec tweaks of my own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 13:49:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121349.l8CDnHo6011551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-12 09:49 EST ------- Let's proceed this review, libzzub still supports wave and aiff files via libsndfile so it's not pointless after all. Most probably we won't even need to change anything after the next libsndfile revision, i.e. flac will work out-of-the-box then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 14:05:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226000] Merge Review: libdv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121405.l8CE5jO8008250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libdv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226000 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 10:05 EST ------- Yeah, kill the tabs! :-) One more minor change I forgot : The man pages in %files aren't listed consistently, or even right. They should all be foo.1* with no foo.1.gz since the compression used is an rpm build time option. I also just double checked a rebuild, and it seems that this package got affected by the recent rpm/popt split : checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... no configure: WARNING: playdv needs the popt package for command line parsing. The source archive for popt is available at: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/code/popt So you need to add "BuildRequires: popt-devel". Apart from this, the package looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 14:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121414.l8CEEMDh009134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 10:14 EST ------- Okay! ----------------------------------------------------- This pacakge (animorph) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 14:23:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226000] Merge Review: libdv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121423.l8CEN4mn010425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libdv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226000 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-09-12 10:23 EST ------- Okay, files list fixed up, as well as BR: on popt-devel, conditional on fedora >= 8 added. Good catch on the popt-devel, I've mostly had my head in the sand wrt fedora the past month or so focused on rhel5.1 work, had no clue there'd been a change there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:00:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121500.l8CF0cwo023473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 11:00 EST ------- Well, then for 0.2.3-4: * Redundant Requires - "Requires: flac >= 1.1.4" is actually not needed. I checked that soversion of libFLAC changed between <1.1.4 and >= 1.1.4, so this must correctly be treated by rpmbuild automated library check. - Still BuildRequires: flac-devel >= 1.1.4 is needed. Note that if you want to import this also on FC-6, FC-6 flac is 1.1.2. * Other things are okay. ========================================================= This package (libzzub) is APPROVED by me ========================================================= Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226558] Merge Review: xfsprogs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121506.l8CF6pmF017475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xfsprogs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226558 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs- | ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-12 11:06 EST ------- closing this until cattelan has a fedora acct. AFAIK I'm the lucky new owner of xfsprogs, now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225632] Merge Review: byacc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121510.l8CFAUvk025229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: byacc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225632 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-09-12 11:10 EST ------- I removed the update part, but other than that, I applied the patch unmodified. Thanks. I rebuilt the package: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=156588 I will push new version post F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:12:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226000] Merge Review: libdv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121512.l8CFCBHu025480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libdv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226000 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 11:12 EST ------- (OT: Good to know, I'm impatient for RHEL5.1 to come out :-)) Thanks for fixing so quickly, review finished! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:16:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121516.l8CFGSMg018896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-12 11:16 EST ------- http://examples.oreilly.com/masteralgoc/ A new tarball has been uploaded there, and the source code is now under the MIT license. HAproxy should be able to pick this code up and resolve the licensing pain (if they want to). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:22:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121522.l8CFMRl6019819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 11:22 EST ------- Ondrej, please don't forget to set fedora-cvs flag to ? . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121527.l8CFRwYu027954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 11:27 EST ------- This request will be closed if no response from the reporter is received within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:25:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121525.l8CFPnUN027712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ondrejj at salstar.sk | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 11:25 EST ------- * Please rebuild this package also on devel repo * For F-7 repo, please request to move from testing to stable repo. After you successfully rebuild this on devel, please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121532.l8CFW5Yv021326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(shadowarts at shadowa | |rts.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 11:32 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:38:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225632] Merge Review: byacc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121538.l8CFc4RF022375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: byacc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225632 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-12 11:38 EST ------- Great, thanks! I've double checked everything, and it all looks good. Review finished ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:41:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] New: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: makghosh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/sirius.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/sirius-0.8.0-5.src.rpm Description: Hi! I just finished packaging up Sirius. This is my first package, and I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into the Fedora repository. Sirius is a program for playing the game of othello. The program includes an AI (Artificial Intelligence) opponent which plays at a very challenging level and is actually quite hard to beat. The AI opponent's strength can therefore be adjusted in several ways to give you a suitable opponent. The AI opponent uses a plain alpha-beta search with hashing to figure out which move to make. To be able to tell a god position from a bad one, it uses a pattern based evaluation function. The pattern used is the 9 discs surrounding each corner and the 8 discs creating the edge of the board. The evaluation function also takes mobility, potential mobility and parity into count. For the initial 9 moves the AI opponent optionally uses a simple opening book. During midgame it searches and evaluates about 200.000 nodes per second on a PIII 750 MHz, in the endgame this number is significantly higher due to more transpositions and a less expensive evaluation function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:52:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121552.l8CFqM2Y032292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 11:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 15:54:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121554.l8CFsTqn032506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 11:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253749] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121625.l8CGPd6W031186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253749 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 12:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:31:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121631.l8CGVgeH031926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 12:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:43:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121643.l8CGhhaf008339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-12 12:43 EST ------- xsc-1.5-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:40:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121640.l8CGeo7D007671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 281601] Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121643.l8CGhio9008372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsc - A clone of the old vector graphics video game Star Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281601 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.5-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:41:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249059] Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121641.l8CGfwMV001089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wdaemon - hotplug helper for wacom x.org driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249059 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-12 12:41 EST ------- wdaemon-0.11-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 16:56:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215267] Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121656.l8CGuX3M011433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Django - A high-level Python Web framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215267 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 12:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:13:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121713.l8CHD384007669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-12 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #65) Feel free to send a patch against 0.12 you pointed out in your comment, I'll review it and apply it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:20:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 288051] New: Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288051 Summary: Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kommander/kommander.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kommander/kommander-1.3.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Kommander is a visual dialog building tool which may be expanded to create full mainwindow applications. The primary objective is to create as much functionality as possible without using any scripting language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:40:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121740.l8CHexl7012427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-12 13:40 EST ------- Even the subpackages split without texlive- prefix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:48:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217484] Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121748.l8CHmaGZ013317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlwrap - Wrapper for GNU readline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217484 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 13:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:49:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 201337] Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121749.l8CHnHVh021078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcin - Chinese input method for Traditional Chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201337 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 13:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:56:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121756.l8CHuOIP022530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico.| |ca) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 17:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226109] Merge Review: ltrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121755.l8CHtbXZ022355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ltrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226109 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2007-09-12 13:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > X the package must meet the Packaging Guidelines > - please add %{?_smp_mflags} to the make command > - the line before %configure doesn't seem to be necessary. If it is, please > add a comment. Also would be nice to have a comment for the relro linker flag relro flag is not really useful the line fetching -m32/-m64 from RPM_OPT_FLAGS is necessary because the build machinery doesn't honor CFLAGS/LDFLAGS everywhere, and the compiler then may try to mix 32bit and 64bit objects. It doesn't happen in koji, but it may happen on the machine in the wild. (And actually happens of the one I have in hand.) I think there are some testsuite failures ATM. I'll look at these and see if I can fix them, but I seem to recall they were related to building in koji. Since there is no mechanism to grab a build root and experiment inside, it's quite hard to debug such problems. I'll enable the suite if possible. I commited the rest of recommended cleanups, but didn't build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 18:04:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121804.l8CI46hd015763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-12 14:04 EST ------- OK, folks, it's been another month. If nothing happens soon, I will revoke my approvals and sponsorships and have the empty package directories removed from the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 18:13:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121813.l8CIDajx017382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From neslami at redhat.com 2007-09-12 14:13 EST ------- I'm sorry Jason, this is my fault. I will get back on it ASAP. -- Navid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 18:35:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121835.l8CIZhmc029488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 kushaldas at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 18:36:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121836.l8CIasmI021743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-12 14:36 EST ------- Can not sponsor you. But will try to check it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 18:43:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121843.l8CIhv3C023061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-12 14:43 EST ------- * dist tag missing in release * Don't use %makeinstall try make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT * Take out --add-category X-Fedora \ --add-category Application \ * Please bump the release number in the proper way -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 19:00:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121900.l8CJ0rpY002190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(ondrejj at salstar.sk| |) | ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-12 15:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > * Please rebuild this package also on devel repo Done. > * For F-7 repo, please request to move from testing to stable repo. Done. > After you successfully rebuild this on devel, please close this > bug as NEXTRELEASE. And what with FC6 package? Is it possible to release micq for FC6 too? I have built it in but it is in "needsign" state. Is there a bodhi or something similiar for FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 19:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121910.l8CJAL9u028284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u- | |tokyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 19:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121911.l8CJBduO028439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-12 15:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > * Please rebuild this package also on devel repo > Done. Confirmed. > > * For F-7 repo, please request to move from testing to stable repo. > Done. Confirmed. > > After you successfully rebuild this on devel, please close this > > bug as NEXTRELEASE. > And what with FC6 package? > > Is it possible to release micq for FC6 too? I have built it in but it is in > "needsign" state. Is there a bodhi or something similiar for FC6? I checked and micq is already pushed into FE-6 repo. Now this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 19:24:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121924.l8CJOF5g006309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://sirius.bitvis.nu/ ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-12 15:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > * dist tag missing in release > * Don't use %makeinstall try make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > * Take out --add-category X-Fedora \ > --add-category Application \ > * Please bump the release number in the proper way Ok. I will redo these advised changes :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 19:43:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709121943.l8CJhN05009637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-12 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Is there really no documentation for some of these packages? No problem if > there isn't, just checking. > I did another check and found some docs for the OpenGL addon, the other addons are doc-less. I've also shuffled the other docs around a bit (divided them into normal and devel docs). > Also, the Source URL is 404. No it isn't (I know not a helpfull comment, but I tried it with spectool -g and it works fine). Here is a new version with the docs shuffled and all rpmlint warnings except for the 0 sized file ones fixed. The 0 size files must be there, so ignore the warnings please: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Io-language.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Io-language-20070710-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 20:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709122027.l8CKRw4K017790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-12 16:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: animorph Short Description: 3D Animation and Morph Library Owners: kwizart Branches: devel FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 21:28:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709122128.l8CLSuFf026656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-12 17:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > This is my second package, and I am looking for a sponsor. If it is your second package, how did you submit your first package ? what is the name of your first package? I can sponsor you but first I would like to see whether you have understood the fedora packaging guidelines. So please do at least 2 informal reviews of any package of your choice by adding me as CC: to that bug. #001: As for your %docs, copy/rename docs, so we don't need subdirs in docdir, I'm ok with it. #002: BuildRequires: kdebase-devel >= 3.0 Remove >= 3.0, as fedora core 6 and onwards already has a kde beyond 3.0 #003: # FIXME: ldconfig needed? no it doesn't. use rpmlint to verify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 21:29:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709122129.l8CLTCGg019219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 21:32:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709122132.l8CLW11A019865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2007-09-12 17:32 EST ------- #004: BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Please refer to the fedora packaging guidelines and update the BuildRoot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 22:39:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709122239.l8CMdE1X029627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2007-09-12 18:39 EST ------- Spec URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/serenity.spec (updated) SRPM URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/serenity-1.7.1-2.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > If it is your second package, how did you submit your first package ? > what is the name of your first package? Sorry, this was misleading. The first package, python-textile, also needs to be reviewed, see #284101. > I can sponsor you but first I would like to see whether you have understood > the fedora packaging guidelines. So please do at least 2 informal reviews of > any package of your choice by adding me as CC: to that bug. Ok, will do that. > #002: BuildRequires: kdebase-devel >= 3.0 > Remove >= 3.0, as fedora core 6 and onwards already has a kde beyond 3.0 Fixed. > #003: # FIXME: ldconfig needed? > no it doesn't. use rpmlint to verify. Removed. (In reply to comment #2) > #004: > BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > Please refer to the fedora packaging guidelines and update the BuildRoot > This seems to be a bit controversial, but http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 clearly recommends the above line for BuildRoot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 12 23:20:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709122320.l8CNKj4Z002586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-12 19:20 EST ------- Ah, you defined version as 2007-07-10, so 20070710 isn't in the URL. Always pays to RTFS. :) rpmlint is as above. Everything else is OK AFAICT, md5, spec, mock, BRs, etc. Looks good overall. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 00:06:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130006.l8D06MNk014707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-09-12 20:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Geo-IP Short Description: Efficient Perl bindings for the GeoIP location database Owners: mfleming Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 03:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130342.l8D3gHSo009528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 23:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 03:42:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130342.l8D3gTpo009562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 shadowarts at shadowarts.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(shadowarts at shadowa| |rts.org) | ------- Additional Comments From shadowarts at shadowarts.org 2007-09-12 23:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://shadowarts.nonlogic.org/projects/fedora/quicksynergy-0.7-2/quicksynergy.spec SRPM URL: http://shadowarts.nonlogic.org/projects/fedora/quicksynergy-0.7-2/quicksynergy-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm Here is an updated spec file, I think I knocked down all the bugs. Sorry for the long time to respond, just got back to school last week and was getting situated, etc. Let me know if there are any other problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 03:46:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130346.l8D3ktWO010164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-12 23:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:15:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130415.l8D4FSap008303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-13 00:15 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:16:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130416.l8D4GJ8p008362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-13 00:16 EST ------- Now I made the following changes in the spec file and rebuild the rpms: * added dist tag in the release * Replaced %makeinstall with make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} * Removed --add-category X-Fedora \ --add-category Application \ * Bumped up the release number. So its' now sirius-0.8.0-6 So the updated links for spec and SRPM are at: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/ Specifically, Spec file: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/sirius.spec SRPM: http://makghosh.googlepages.com/sirius-0.8.0-6.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:36:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130436.l8D4aaX1016157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-13 00:36 EST ------- Hopefully fixed :) Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/kbarcode-2.0.5-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:52:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130452.l8D4qoXU018093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 Bug 226302 depends on bug 271861, which changed state. Bug 271861 Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130453.l8D4rekX018175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 Bug 226302 depends on bug 271661, which changed state. Bug 271661 Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:52:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271861] Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130452.l8D4qoH1018069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vbetool - Run real-mode video BIOS code to alter hardware state Alias: vbetool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271861 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-13 00:52 EST ------- built for devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 271661] Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130453.l8D4ret2018151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: radeontool - Backlight and video output configuration tool for radeon cards Alias: radeontool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271661 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-13 00:53 EST ------- built for devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:57:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130457.l8D4vOtM013120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-13 00:57 EST ------- radeontool and vbetool are split out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 04:55:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130455.l8D4tXdS013076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-13 00:55 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 8d27553ae9c582a9d331ea4077063a14 e16-0.16.8.9.tar.gz 8d27553ae9c582a9d331ea4077063a14 e16-0.16.8.9.tar.gz.1 See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Some of the source files appear to be GPLv2+ epp/cpperror.c epp/cppalloc.c epp/cppexp.c epp/cpphash.c epp/cpplib.c epp/cpplib.h epp/cppmain.c >From a quick look, those source files all compile to the epp binary. The rest are BSDish, but not matching exactly any of the examples on the wiki. I am a bit concerned with the second paragraph: " The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies of the Software, its documentation and marketing & publicity materials, and acknowledgment shall be given in the documentation, materials and software packages that this Software was used." In addition there is a copy of the Bitsteam Vera Fonts with their own license inside the "winter.etheme" tar.gz thats in the e16 tar.gz. Can that be made somehow to use the already existing Vera package? I will have spot check it over... 2. Some possible missing BuildRequires: checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability... no checking X11/SM/SMlib.h presence... no checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... no checking for SmcOpenConnection in -lSM... no checking for XFT... no checking for XineramaQueryExtension in -lXinerama... no configure: WARNING: Xinerama support was requested but not found checking for XF86VidModeQueryExtension in -lXxf86vm... no configure: WARNING: Zoom support was requested but not found checking for XRRQueryExtension in -lXrandr... no configure: WARNING: RandR support was requested but not found checking for X11/extensions/Xrandr.h... no checking for XCompositeQueryExtension in -lXcomposite... no checking for X11/extensions/Xcomposite.h... no checking for X11/extensions/Xdamage.h... no checking for X11/extensions/Xfixes.h... no checking for X11/extensions/Xrender.h... no configure: WARNING: Composite support was requested but required component was not found checking for mass_quantities_of_bass_ale in -lFridge... no checking for mass_quantities_of_any_ale in -lFridge... no Warning: No ales were found in your refrigerator. We highly suggest that you rectify this situation immediately. 3. rpmlint says: e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/slideouts/slideouts.cfg e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/buttons/buttons.cfg Not sure if those can be removed, or if they are needed by that theme... e16.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libe16_hack.so libe16_hack.so Does that so file need to be in /usr/lib? e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/ChangeLog e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/AUTHORS Might run 'iconv' on those? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 05:12:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280211] Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130512.l8D5CLJe015091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-sk - Slovak dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280211 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-13 01:12 EST ------- Requested push to Fedora 7 repository on Bodhi. Do I need a special request to push this package to FE-6 and EPEL? They have been compiled, but they are in needsign state: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?email=ondrejj at salstar.sk&uid=36195 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?email=ondrejj at salstar.sk&uid=36197 EL4 package build failed due to dependencies. Can I request branch removal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 05:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130546.l8D5kkxt025105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-13 01:46 EST ------- Best way to check whether desktop files got written correctly or not, use desktop-file-validate command on those 5 desktop files. $ desktop-file-validate kbarcode-batch.desktop kbarcode-batch.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode-batch.desktop: warning: key "DocPath" in group "Desktop Entry" is a reserved key for KDE $ desktop-file-validate kbarcode-editor.desktop kbarcode-editor.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode-editor.desktop: warning: key "DocPath" in group "Desktop Entry" is a reserved key for KDE $ desktop-file-validate kbarcode-label.desktop kbarcode-label.desktop: warning: value "MimeType" for key "Type" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode-label.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode-label.desktop: error: value "application/kbarcode-label" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character kbarcode-label.desktop: error: key "Name[de]" in group "Desktop Entry" is a localized key, but there is no non-localized key "Name" kbarcode-label.desktop: warning: key "Patterns" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode-label.desktop: error: required key "Name" in group "Desktop Entry" is not present $ desktop-file-validate kbarcode-single.desktop kbarcode-single.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode-single.desktop: warning: key "DocPath" in group "Desktop Entry" is a reserved key for KDE kbarcode-single.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" in group "Desktop Entry" has value "0", which is deprecated: boolean values should be "false" or "true" $ desktop-file-validate kbarcode.desktop kbarcode.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated kbarcode.desktop: warning: value "kbarcode -caption "%c" %i %m %f" for key "Exec" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated field code "%m" kbarcode.desktop: error: value "application/kbarcode-label" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character kbarcode.desktop: warning: key "DocPath" in group "Desktop Entry" is a reserved key for KDE kbarcode.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" in group "Desktop Entry" has value "0", which is deprecated: boolean values should be "false" or "true" You can see that still kbarcode-label.desktop and kbarcode.dekstop is having problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 05:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 01:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130552.l8D5qLDX025722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-13 01:52 EST ------- Yes please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 06:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130604.l8D64jhX027041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From kushaldas at gmail.com 2007-09-13 02:04 EST ------- These desktop files are killing me :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 06:23:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130623.l8D6Np8B029285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-13 02:23 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Io-language Short Description: Io is a small, prototype-based programming language Owners: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 06:34:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225634] Merge Review: cadaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130634.l8D6YR9U030514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cadaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225634 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-09-13 02:34 EST ------- Thanks for the review! > - Remove the zero epoch from the neon-devel BR Fixed. > - Include a quick comment as to why pie is needed It's not "needed", it's a feature, I don't think that explaining what -pie is in every spec file which uses it is really a good idea. > - Change %defattr(-,root,root) to the more usual %defattr(-,root,root,-) > (pretty useless, though, since the package doesn't include directories) Fixed. > - Move the %doc line up so that it isn't in between two normal lines And fixed. In -2. Also fixed the use of %makeinstall, which is now unnecessary in 0.23.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 06:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243665] Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130649.l8D6n7u9032284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-IP - Efficient GeoIP bindings for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243665 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-09-13 02:49 EST ------- Imported and building (FC6/devel/EPEL-4 already successful, EPEL 5 and F7 to go..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 06:58:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130658.l8D6wHVL027748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-13 02:58 EST ------- 1) I just removed your patch and modified both desktop files as kbarcode-label.desktop [Desktop Entry] Type=Application Comment=KBarcode Label Encoding=UTF-8 Icon=kbarcode MimeType=application/kbarcode-label; Name=kbarcode-label.desktop kbarcode.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Type=Application Exec=kbarcode -caption "%c" %i %m %f Icon=kbarcode.png MimeType=application/kbarcode-label; DocPath=kbarcode/index.html Comment=Barcode and label printing tool Comment[de]=Werkzeug zum Barcode und Etiketten Druck Terminal=0 Name=KBarcode Name[de]=KBarcode Categories=Qt;KDE;Office; and mock build went fine. Also, you would like to check http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/apc.html 2) /usr/share/apps/kbarcode is not owned by this package 3) Good to add scriptlets %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 07:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130704.l8D74LVX001577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-13 03:04 EST ------- Oops. No desktop files got installed other than kfile_kbarcode.desktop? No Exec is present in kfile_kbarcode.desktop. why following line is present in SPEC rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/*.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 07:40:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130740.l8D7e9b3006326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 03:40 EST ------- For 0.7-2: * The remaining issues - Still the two issues mentioned above are not fixed * "INSTALL" document is not needed * desktop file must be installed by "desktop-file-install" * Redundant BuildRequires - Check if the following BuildRequires are really needed. ---------------------------------------------------- autoconf automake gettext ---------------------------------------------------- For me they don't seem to be needed. Other things are okay. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 07:43:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130743.l8D7hDkB001051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 07:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130748.l8D7mRIE007204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ORBit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 03:48 EST ------- Matthias, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 08:13:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130813.l8D8Djxc006048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lists at forevermore. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mfleming+rpm at enlartenment.com 2007-09-13 04:13 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 08:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130844.l8D8iW7H015727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-13 04:44 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/libzzub-0.2.3-5.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - removed redundant explicit flac requirement I'm certain that FC-6 support is negligible, Fedora 7 is the first version seriously suitable for sound production without tweaking much and involving Planet CCRMA. Thank you Mamoru! I'm going to apply for the account during the day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 09:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130903.l8D93XUb013036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 05:03 EST ------- For 1.1.3-1: * rpmlint - First please check your rpms by rpmlint before submitting to review request. ----------------------------------------------------- libconfig.i386: E: info-files-without-install-info-postin /usr/share/info/libconfig.info.gz libconfig.i386: E: info-files-without-install-info-postun /usr/share/info/libconfig.info.gz libconfig.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libconfig.so.2.2.3 libconfig.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libconfig.so.2.2.3 libconfig.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libconfig-1.1.3/AUTHORS libconfig.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libconfig++.so.2.2.3 libconfig.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libconfig++.so.2.2.3 libconfig-devel.i386: W: no-documentation ----------------------------------------------------- For this package, the rpmlint complaint above must all be fixed (for this package, info file should be moved to -devel subpackage). * Static archive - Please remove static archives and pass "--disable-static" option to %configure. * Documents - File "INSTALL" is for people who want to build this package by themselves and not needed for people who use rpm for installing this package. (also check the section "Documentation" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) - And please also check if "README" file is needed. - File "ChangeLog" contains the useful info for developers and should be added to -devel subpackage. * pkgconfig .pc file - A package which contains pkgconfig .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig". Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines * Timestamp - I recommend ----------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ----------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamp on the installed header files and info file. This method usually work for packages using recent Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 09:24:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709130924.l8D9Oc8b016134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-13 05:24 EST ------- I am currently working on the patch, but I found out that there is no clear dependency between -font and main package, now that kpse* files are in main. In fact the kpathsea executables are sort of low-level utilities for both packages. What about the following: rename the current kpathsea kpathsea-libs add a subpackage name kpathsea holding the kpse* executable and some of the files in %_datadir/texmf/kpathsea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 10:02:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 288051] Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131002.l8DA2r0p021443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288051 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |than at redhat.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu, | |fedora at deadbabylon.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-13 06:02 EST ------- Kommander is part of kde's kdewebdev package (but kdewebdev-3.5.7 only ships kommander 1.2.1). So this would result in installation conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 10:27:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131027.l8DARj1V029477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-13 06:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=194451) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=194451&action=view) anyedit specfile patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 10:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131028.l8DASEZo024519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-13 06:28 EST ------- Hi Rob, I have just finish the pre-review of this package - In the big part the package seems to be OK, there is just two things that need to be fixed. I have attached a patch that fix these two issue. Personally, I prefer to build eclipse plugin using a feature, in this case the advantage is that the bundle is automatically jarred, another advantage is to be more consistent with our other packages. So is there any technical reason to not use a feature instead of these two ant target? The 'MUST' and 'SHOULD' headers just reflect the sections here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines?action=show&redirect=PackageReviewGuidelines - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK, but yes I have only tested on an i386 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Normally that's OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. NOK. You should add this line to the files section, take a look on the patch. %dir %{eclipse_base}/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_%{version} - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. NOK. The last parameter of the defattr directive set permissions on directories, something like %defattr(-,root,root,-) seems better. See http://docs.fedoraproject.org/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html for more information about defattr. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Can you ask upstream about this? - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK, AFAICS there isn't translation for summary available. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Rob, have you try to build this package in mock on rawhide? - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. It's only a should, so... maybe OK ;-) - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 10:45:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131045.l8DAjP8d026913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-13 06:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=194481) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=194481&action=view) Modified SPEC Hey I did some work for you :) Test attached SPEC. Add changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 11:23:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131123.l8DBNCNH003924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-13 07:23 EST ------- Thanks for the update. Please bump the release number for each new revision. The rpmlint output is clean now. :) Presumably for Indic we don't need fonts.dir and fonts.scale? How about a catalogue file? (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS) My review follows: Good: + rpmlint clean + package follows upstream project name + package is based on fonts-indic + following Packaging Guidelines except as noted below + license is good (GPLv2) and included + spec file is clearly written + md5sum is pristine bb9497ee772062b97ff00a1a68b17c98 fonts-indic-2.1.5.tar.gz + builds correctly + filelists are correct + font install scriptlets are standard Bad: - should not Requires fontconfig explicitly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 11:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131123.l8DBNTP3031163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 11:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131127.l8DBRCWf031741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-13 07:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=194541) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=194541&action=view) lohit-fonts.spec-1.patch - also should not obsolete fonts-indic packages - they will now require lohit-fonts and some other things I noticed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 11:48:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 288051] Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131148.l8DBmdmQ002020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288051 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 07:48 EST ------- Yup, looks like a case where we need to update kdewebdev's %%description, and possibly add Provides to minimize confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 12:13:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131213.l8DCD5Zn010137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-13 08:13 EST ------- from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901#c5, retain old Source tag instead one suggested in above patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 12:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253020] Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131226.l8DCQlTE012277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 12:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131226.l8DCQlU8012305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 Bug 253022 depends on bug 253020, which changed state. Bug 253020 Summary: Review Request: animorph - 3D Animation and Morph Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253020 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 12:24:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131224.l8DCOCAB006905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - Libraries for mhgui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 08:24 EST ------- For mhgui 0.1-1: (rebuild okay: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=157572 ) * SourceURL - SourceURL is wrong.. (one character missing: download.sourceforge should be downloads.sourceforge) = For X dependency > * configure says > -------------------------------------------- > checking for X... no > -------------------------------------------- - After checking rpmlint, I noticed that the all the other X dependencies added by X related devel package are not directly used, so BuildRequires is correct. Please fix SourceURL before committing to CVS. Other things are okay. =============================================== This package (mhgui) is APPROVED by me =============================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 12:32:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131232.l8DCW3Gi008148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:13:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] New: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdelibs4.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdelibs4-3.93.0-7.fc7.src.rpm Description: These are the KDE 4 (beta 2) libraries, packaged in a way as to not conflict with KDE 3. They can be used to develop, compile and/or run KDE 4 applications in a KDE 3 (or GNOME, XFCE etc.) environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] New: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/qimageblitz.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/qimageblitz-0.0.4-0.1.svn706674.fc7.src.rpm Description: Blitz is an interim image effect library that people can use until KDE 4.1 is released. KImageEffect, the old image effect class is being dropped for KDE 4.0 and the replacement, Quasar, won't be ready until KDE 4.1. Blitz gives people something to use in the meantime. (This is a dependency of kdebase4.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131317.l8DDH6OF015113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-13 09:17 EST ------- Note: This requires the latest kde-filesystem from the kde-filesystem-kde4-branch which contains the necessary directories and macros for KDE 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131323.l8DDNfAh021282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |248898, 289231, 289241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:21:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131321.l8DDLeAF021006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-09-13 09:21 EST ------- I updated the spec and srpm at the above links to fix the issues, except for the static library comment. Almost all of the static libraries on my rawhide system are in the devel package. The ones that arent are in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:23:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131323.l8DDNgol021310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |289251 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131323.l8DDNhhj021338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |289251 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:23:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131323.l8DDNjI6021371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |289251 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:23:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] New: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdebase4.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdebase4-3.93.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the runtime bits (kdebase/runtime and the non-conflicting stuff in kdebase/apps) for KDE 4 (beta 2), packaged in a way as to not conflict with KDE 3. Requires kde-filesystem-3.92 (no review needed), kdelibs4 (#289231), kdepimlibs (#248898, already reviewed) and qimageblitz (#289241). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:20:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131320.l8DDKKqB015776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-09-13 09:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Hi Rob, > > I have just finish the pre-review of this package - In the big part the package > seems to be OK, there is just two things that need to be fixed. I have attached > a patch that fix these two issue. the patch seems to reflect your packaging preferences rather than Fedora packaging requirements. for example, the patch changes a line that is cut'n'pasted directly from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NativeJava #6. we should probably work with Ben Konrath and Andrew Overholt to come up with an EclipseAddons packaging guide- that way we can capture the best practices and ensure some level of consistency between the eclipse plugin packages. > Personally, I prefer to build eclipse plugin using a feature, in this case the > advantage is that the bundle is automatically jarred, another advantage is to be > more consistent with our other packages. So is there any technical reason to not > use a feature instead of these two ant target? i don't recall- i'll take a look. > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not > create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does > create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. > > NOK. You should add this line to the files section, take a look on the patch. > %dir %{eclipse_base}/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_%{version} AFAICT, this requirement is already met. rpm shows that this directory is already owned by the rpm: # rpm -qf /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_1.8.2 eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-1.el5 am i missing something? > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. > > NOK. The last parameter of the defattr directive set permissions on directories, > something like %defattr(-,root,root,-) seems better. > See http://docs.fedoraproject.org/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html for > more information about defattr. i believe the package currently meets this requirement, because it already includes a %defattr line. however, i will include your suggestion because it does seem more explicit. thank you for bringing defattr's fourth argument to my attention- i didn't know it existed. :) would you be interested in co-maintaining this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:27:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131327.l8DDRwJ8022321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |248898 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:27:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131327.l8DDRvLm022276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |289231 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-13 09:27 EST ------- Given that the plan for F8 has changed, we cannot simply update kdelibs to the KDE 4 version, so this cannot be built before kdelibs4 is approved and imported. (That's also why it's still open.) Adding a dependency accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:35:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131335.l8DDZj0m023751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bos at serpentine.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 09:35 EST ------- per comment #47... ping Bryan, afaict, I've fixed the MUST items you asked for... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:35:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131335.l8DDZdhS018240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 09:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > except for the > static library comment. Almost all of the static libraries on my rawhide system > are in the devel package. No, please seperate static archives (or remove all of them if not needed). Please check "Exclusion of Static Libraries" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines (In reply to comment #6) > I updated the spec and srpm at the above links Please don't do this. Change the release number every time you modify your spec file. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:40:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131340.l8DDeRfO024534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 09:40 EST ------- Rex, so how do you deal with libpythonplugin.so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:40:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131340.l8DDer3W019050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-09-13 09:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > So is there any technical reason to not > > use a feature instead of these two ant target? > > i don't recall- i'll take a look. it builds as a plugin, but not as a feature. here is the error when trying to build as a feature: BUILD FAILED /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:24: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:64: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/templates/package-build/customTargets.xml:17: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.2.1.r321_v20060823/scripts/genericTargets.xml:80: Unable to find feature: de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:53:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131353.l8DDr4UL020537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-13 09:53 EST ------- I meant updated license tag, sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:52:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131352.l8DDqTQ0020493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 09:52 EST ------- It appears the configure.py isn't 64bit clean, hard-coding some library paths -L.../lib looking for libpython, hopefully shouldn't be too hard to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:52:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131352.l8DDqHOc020462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-13 09:52 EST ------- Updated dist tag Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits-6.2.0-0.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:56:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131356.l8DDuZI8021223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 09:56 EST ------- Arg, looks like a bug in sip, /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/sipconfig.py contains: 'py_lib_dir': '/usr/lib/python2.5/config', should be: 'py_lib_dir': '/usr/lib64/python2.5/config', -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 13:59:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131359.l8DDxp5w021518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |289321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 14:18:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131418.l8DEIDa7029745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 10:18 EST ------- I'm maintaining libtunepimp, would you like to comaintain these together? (If so, I can help review this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 14:42:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131442.l8DEgP6r000765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mhgui - |Review Request: mhgui - A |Libraries for mhgui |simple GUI library for | |MakeHuman ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-13 10:42 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/mhgui.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/mhgui-0.1-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: A simple GUI library for MakeHuman %changelog - Fix URL - Change summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 14:43:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131443.l8DEhJuc028584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-13 10:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mhgui Short Description: A simple GUI library for MakeHuman Owners: kwizart Branches: devel FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 14:46:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131446.l8DEkeiI029327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-09-13 10:46 EST ------- Fine. http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools.spec http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools-3.3.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 14:46:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131446.l8DEkHEJ029277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 14:45:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131445.l8DEjsJF029230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 10:45 EST ------- Well, much progress!! For 0.2.2-1: * Redundant Requires - "Requires: python >= 2.3" is not needed. rpmbuild automatically checks python version dependency for this package. You can see "rpm -q --requires outerspace" contains "python(abi) = 2.5". * Desktop file vendor -------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install \ --vendor="ospace.net" \ -------------------------------------------- - Please change the vendor name to "fedora". * %files entry cleanup - When foo is a directory, writing -------------------------------------------- %files foo/ -------------------------------------------- means the directory foo/ itself and all the files/directories/etc under foo/. So: -------------------------------------------- %dir %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/*.py* %dir %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/pgu %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/pgu/*.py* %dir %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/pgu/gui %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/pgu/gui/*.py* %dir %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/urlgrabber %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/urlgrabber/*.py* --------------------------------------------- can be replaced with one line: --------------------------------------------- %{python_sitelib}/oslauncher/ --------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue - Currently /usr/share/outerspace is not owned by any package. --------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/%{name}/* --------------------------------------------- must be: --------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/%{name}/ --------------------------------------------- * Duplicate file - The file "/usr/share/outerspace/gray/Vera.ttf" (in this package) is actually the same as "/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf", which is in bitstream-vera-fonts. So, please: - Replace /usr/share/outerspace/gray/Vera.ttf with the symlink to "../../fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf" (symlink should be relative) - And add "BuildRequires: bitstream-vera-fonts" "Requires: bitstream-vera-fonts". Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 15:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131500.l8DF0Ouo031475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-13 11:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > the patch seems to reflect your packaging preferences rather than Fedora > packaging requirements. > for example, the patch changes a line that is > cut'n'pasted directly from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NativeJava #6. No, take a look for example on eclipse-changelog and eclipse-mylyn, the features directories are tagged with %dir macro and the second defattr that you add for the .so files was not necessary - I just follow the way of doing of other packager. > we should probably work with Ben Konrath and Andrew Overholt to come up with an > EclipseAddons packaging guide- that way we can capture the best practices and > ensure some level of consistency between the eclipse plugin packages. IMHO without guideline to packaging eclipse bundle the best way is to stay consistent with the other packages already in. Perhaps, in a near future we would generate the whole specfile from the feature.xml using the rpmstubby plugin. > AFAICT, this requirement is already met. rpm shows that this directory is > already owned by the rpm: > # rpm -qf /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_1.8.2 > eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-1.el5 > am i missing something? I can be wrong but in all the eclipse packages the features use the %dir tag to say that the directory is owned by the package. Maybe rpm do that automatically too? > > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > > %defattr(...) line. > > > > NOK. The last parameter of the defattr directive set permissions on directories, > > something like %defattr(-,root,root,-) seems better. > > See http://docs.fedoraproject.org/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html for > > more information about defattr. > > i believe the package currently meets this requirement, because it already > includes a %defattr line. however, i will include your suggestion because it > does seem more explicit. thank you for bringing defattr's fourth argument to my attention- i didn't know it existed. :) :), Me too, before someone ask me to add this arg. > would you be interested in co-maintaining this package? Why not ;-) (In reply to comment #10) Please, can you attach the feature.xml, so that I can make a try here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 15:13:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131513.l8DFDOJJ005902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 11:13 EST ------- First comment: * update-desktop-database - Not needed because this desktop does not contain any mimetypes. * rpmlint - Please explain what the folloiwng zero-length files are for. ------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/makehuman/targets/ns_tongue/tongue_camaleon.target /usr/share/makehuman/targets/ns_teeth/teeth_gengivite.target /usr/share/makehuman/targets/l_ear2/l_ear_incisura_intertragica_down.target /usr/share/makehuman/targets/ns_abdomen/abdomen_twist.target -------------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamp - This package installs many "data" files and keeping timestamps on those files is _very_ desirable. * First add the option 'INSTALL="install -p"' to 'make install' for files under /usr/share/makehuman/base.* . - For the rest of the files, almost of them are installed by "cp -R", like: --------------------------------------------------------------- make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/makehuman-0.9/data' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. /builddir/build/BUILD/makehuman-0.9/install-sh -d /var/tmp/makehuman-0.9-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/makehuman cp -R ./targets /var/tmp/makehuman-0.9-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/makehuman cp -R ./rotations /var/tmp/makehuman-0.9-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/makehuman cp -R ./rib_data /var/tmp/makehuman-0.9-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/makehuman ---------------------------------------------------------------- So, changing "cp -R" to "cp -pR" will keep timestamps on almost all files. Please fix the corresponding Makefile(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 15:19:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131519.l8DFJrN4002218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-13 11:19 EST ------- libtunepimp is deprecated, isn't it? I'd be more than happy to have a libmusicbrainz co-maintainer, but I'm not really interested in maintaining a deprecated library :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 15:27:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131527.l8DFRcd7008877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-13 11:27 EST ------- Rebuild failed on dist-f8. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=157776 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=157780&name=build.log (I just tried to rebuild your -3 srpm and have not checked it yet....) Note: on rawhide, for the categories "Application;System;Utilities;X-Red-Hat-Base;", the valid category is only "System". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 15:26:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131526.l8DFQ4Rd003924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-09-13 11:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ocamlnet.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ocamlnet-2.2.8.1-1.src.rpm * Thu Sep 13 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.2.8.1-1 - New upstream version 2.2.8.1. - License of the base package is in fact BSD. Clarified also that the license of nethttpd is GPLv2+. - Removed the camlp4 paths patch as it doesn't seem to be necessary. - Add BRs for camlp4, ocaml-pcre-devel, ocaml-lablgtk-devel, openssl-devel - Removed explicit requires, they're not needed. - Strip binaries and libraries. - Ignore Parsetree module in deps. * Thu Aug 2 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 2.2.7-6 - ExcludeArch ppc64 - BR ocaml-pcre-devel - Fix for camlp4 missing path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 15:48:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131548.l8DFmfBg012156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 11:48 EST ------- > libtunepimp is deprecated, isn't it? news to me, amarok uses it (afaik, amarok2 will too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:01:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131601.l8DG1heC014029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-09-13 12:01 EST ------- I forgot to add that rpmlint on the above package will complain with error messages like this: ocaml-ocamlnet-nethttpd.x86_64: E: useless-explicit-provides ocaml(Nethttpd_engine) However this is not an error. The package provides two sets of modules with the same name but different implementations, which can be selected separately with ocamlfind when linking. # rpm -qlp ocaml-ocamlnet-nethttpd-2.2.8.1-1.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi1 /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi1/META /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi1/nethttpd-for-netcgi1.cma /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi1/nethttpd_engine.cmi [...] /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi2 /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi2/META /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi2/nethttpd-for-netcgi2.cma /usr/lib64/ocaml/nethttpd-for-netcgi2/nethttpd_engine.cmi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:00:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 288051] Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131600.l8DG0dO1009191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288051 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 12:00 EST ------- rawhide updated... %changelog * Thu Sep 13 2007 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.7-2 ... - update %%description - Provides: kdewebdev3 kommander ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:04:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131604.l8DG4LBM009387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-09-13 12:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pxp.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pxp-1.2.0test1-2.src.rpm * Thu Sep 13 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.2.0test1-2 - Build on OCaml 3.10 - Disable building the preprocessor (requires old camlp4 or camlp5). - License is BSD. - Ignore Parsetree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131621.l8DGLfOr016875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-13 12:21 EST ------- http://musicbrainz.org/doc/libtunepimpDownload says: " libtunepimp uses the old RDF WebService and should not be used in new development. See WebService for more details." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:50:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131650.l8DGoG0V021577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-13 12:50 EST ------- FYI, eclipse-quickrex, is no shipped with a feature.xml at this time, you can take a look there to see if you miss something. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/eclipse-quickrex/devel/ Cheers, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 288051] Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131651.l8DGpD3g021756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kommander - Visual dialog building tool for KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288051 jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2007-09-13 12:51 EST ------- Thank you for your explainatio. I will close this bug now with fedora-review='-'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:55:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131655.l8DGtskn022611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-13 12:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 16:55:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131655.l8DGtqil022560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2007-09-13 12:55 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce-0.5.0-1.src.rpm * Thu Sep 13 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.5.0-1 - Upstream version 0.5.0 - Remove RPATH in cduce binary. - ExcludeArch ppc64. - Build without ocamlopt. - Convert AUTHORS file to UTF-8. - Ignore Parsetree module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 17:01:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131701.l8DH1iDo023692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-13 13:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 17:18:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253749] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131718.l8DHIoiD026558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-advmultiselect - Element for HTML_QuickForm that emulate a multi-select https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253749 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 17:32:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131732.l8DHWKhh029382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libmusicbrainz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 13:32 EST ------- doh, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 17:38:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131738.l8DHcG2H025166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From shadowarts at shadowarts.org 2007-09-13 13:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://shadowarts.nonlogic.org/projects/fedora/quicksynergy-0.7-3/quicksynergy.spec SRPM URL: http://shadowarts.nonlogic.org/projects/fedora/quicksynergy-0.7-3/quicksynergy-0.7-3.fc7.src.rpm Alright I think I fixed everything now... finally. Your right about autoconf automake and gettext, I don't need them. Sorry about the two repeat issues, I thought I had fixed them already but maybe I forgot to save. Anyway let me know if it is good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:05:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265841] Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131805.l8DI5Ysr002943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blcr - Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265841 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-13 14:05 EST ------- So it has come to pass that Fedora will no longer accept external kernel module packages. So either your modules are destined for the upstream kernel, in which case there's a possibility that they could be patched into the Fedora kernel package, or this package is simply not appropriate for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:12:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253022] Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131812.l8DICcOu031848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:12:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131812.l8DICdLS031873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 Bug 253024 depends on bug 253022, which changed state. Bug 253022 Summary: Review Request: mhgui - A simple GUI library for MakeHuman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253022 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] New: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca2.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca2-2.0.0-0.1.beta7.fc7.i386.rpm Description: Taking a hint from the similarly-named Java Cryptography Architecture, QCA aims to provide a straightforward and cross-platform crypto API, using Qt datatypes and conventions. QCA separates the API from the implementation, using plugins known as Providers. The advantage of this model is to allow applications to avoid linking to or explicitly depending on any particular cryptographic library. This allows one to easily change or upgrade crypto implementations without even needing to recompile the application! This package is a new (and incompatible) version of qca (which is already in Fedora), but designed for QT4. Like QT, both versions will have to live simultaneously. It should be rather easy to review. and qt4). Please copy the qca/devel module in qca2/devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:27:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131827.l8DIR444002082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |289681 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:27:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131827.l8DIR4lt002103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |289701 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] New: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gauret at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca-ossl.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca2-2.0.0-0.1.beta7.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a plugin to provide SSL/TLS capability to programs that use the Qt Cryptographic Architecture (QCA). QCA is a library providing an easy API for several cryptographic algorithms to Qt programs. This package only contains the TLS plugin. This package is a rename of the existing, Fedora-included qca-tls, but for qca2. It should be rather easy to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:35:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131835.l8DIZ1Ye008552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-13 14:35 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:35:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284151] Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131835.l8DIZJhd008928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Io-language - Io is a small, prototype-based programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284151 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:37:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131837.l8DIbalK009213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-09-13 14:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > the patch seems to reflect your packaging preferences rather than Fedora > > packaging requirements. > > for example, the patch changes a line that is > > cut'n'pasted directly from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NativeJava #6. > No, take a look for example on eclipse-changelog and eclipse-mylyn, the features > directories are tagged with %dir macro and the second defattr that you add for > the .so files was not necessary - I just follow the way of doing of other packager. your example packages are no better (or worse) than my example from the wiki. these are not Fedora packaging requirements. > > we should probably work with Ben Konrath and Andrew Overholt to come up with an > > EclipseAddons packaging guide- that way we can capture the best practices and > > ensure some level of consistency between the eclipse plugin packages. > IMHO without guideline to packaging eclipse bundle the best way is to stay > consistent with the other packages already in. IMO, if there is a best way to package eclipse plugin packages, it needs to be captured in a document, and submitted to the packaging committee for consideration. > Perhaps, in a near future we would generate the whole specfile from the > feature.xml using the rpmstubby plugin. that will be nice. :) > > AFAICT, this requirement is already met. rpm shows that this directory is > > already owned by the rpm: > > # rpm -qf /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_1.8.2 > > eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2-1.el5 > > am i missing something? > I can be wrong but in all the eclipse packages the features use the %dir tag to > say that the directory is owned by the package. Maybe rpm do that automatically too? > > > > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > > > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > > > %defattr(...) line. > > > > > > NOK. The last parameter of the defattr directive set permissions on directories, > > > something like %defattr(-,root,root,-) seems better. > > > See http://docs.fedoraproject.org/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html for > > > more information about defattr. > > > > i believe the package currently meets this requirement, because it already > > includes a %defattr line. however, i will include your suggestion because it > > does seem more explicit. thank you for bringing defattr's fourth argument to > my attention- i didn't know it existed. :) > :), Me too, before someone ask me to add this arg. > > > would you be interested in co-maintaining this package? > Why not ;-) cool. > (In reply to comment #10) > Please, can you attach the feature.xml, so that I can make a try here. i didn't see the point of making a feature.xml, when the upstream source already comes with a plugin.xml and things seem to work. is there some advantage to a feature that would justify the additional work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 18:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131855.l8DItCBx007399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-13 14:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > i didn't see the point of making a feature.xml, when the upstream source already > comes with a plugin.xml and things seem to work. is there some advantage to a > feature that would justify the additional work? The bundle is automatically jarred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 19:20:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131920.l8DJK0fO016730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2007-09-13 15:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > i didn't see the point of making a feature.xml, when the upstream source already > > comes with a plugin.xml and things seem to work. is there some advantage to a > > feature that would justify the additional work? > > The bundle is automatically jarred. hmm that seems like marginal benefit for me... but as co-maintainer you'll have free reign for all the marginal benefits you like. :-) overholt seems interested/willing to work on eclipse plugin packaging guidelines, so if you have any preferences or best practices to contribute please send them along to us. i'm sure at some point this will lead to a wiki page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 19:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131939.l8DJdafI014682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-13 15:39 EST ------- Updated to fix missing BR alsa-lib-devel (needed for Phonon-xine): Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdebase4.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdebase4-3.93.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 19:58:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709131958.l8DJwVR1023353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 15:58 EST ------- initial comments 0. naming. Since this is a qt4 addon, maybe qt4-qca? This would only make sense if the existing qca were (re)named qt-qca. Else qca, qca2 worksforme too. :) 1. configure. I suggest using instead: unset QTDIR ./configure \ --prefix=%{_prefix} \ --includedir=%{_includedir} \ --libdir=%{_libdir} \ --datadir=%{_datadir} \ --no-separate-debug-info \ --verbose Use of --no-separate-debug-info allows one to not have to mess with omitting/excluding lib*.debug files later). If you want qca2 to be installed into the same place(s) as qt4, use macros _qt4_prefix, _qt4_includedir, _qt4_libdir, _qt4_datadir instead, but I don't think this is needed, as long as there are no conflicts between qca(1) and qca2. 2. --certstore-path should probably be set to something under /etc/pki/... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 20:12:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132012.l8DKCx6J020141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 16:12 EST ------- 3. naming... qca2-ossl? (alternatively, either retire existing qca-1.x or make a compat pkg compat-qca or qca1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 20:11:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132011.l8DKBOtk020003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-13 16:11 EST ------- Initial comments: 0. SRPM URL appears wrong. qca2 != qca-ossl ?? 1. configure (like qca2), I suggest using something like: unset QTDIR ./configure \ --no-separate-debug-info 2. use %{_qt4_plugindir} everwhere instead of %{_qt4_prefix}/plugins/ or $QTDIR/plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 20:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132019.l8DKJNuL026220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-13 16:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > hmm that seems like marginal benefit for me... but as co-maintainer you'll have > free reign for all the marginal benefits you like. :-) At the moment is not so marginal as you think - you can't package java classes outside a jar file. As workaround you can disable the build of the debuginfo package (%define debug_package %{nil}) See this bz report for more informations about this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273881 > overholt seems interested/willing to work on eclipse plugin packaging > guidelines, so if you have any preferences or best practices to contribute > please send them along to us. i'm sure at some point this will lead to a wiki page. Yeah, that seems to be a good think todo but I'm not sure that I can give valuate help to Andrew on this - just because I use him packages as template :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 20:56:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132056.l8DKuWkM032225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From jafo at tummy.com 2007-09-13 16:56 EST ------- The changes in the above spec file look good to me, and rpmlint is not reporting any errors. There are some warnings about doc files not being UTF-8 though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:02:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] New: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: ROXTerm is a terminal emulator intended to provide similar features to gnome-terminal, based on the same VTE library, but with a smaller footprint and quicker start-up time. It achieves this by not using the Gnome libraries and by using a separate applet to provide the configuration GUI. It can be used as a ROX application, as the name implies, or in any other X environment. Small note about a rpmlint error: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/roxterm-config roxterm-config is the configuration editor for edit some settings. So it must be in the normal package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:07:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] New: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: notting at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/generic-logos.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/notting/review/generic-logos-7.92.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The generic-logos package contains various image files which can be used by the bootloader, anaconda, and other related tools. It can be used as a replacement for the fedora-logos package, if you are unable for any reason to abide by the trademark restrictions on the fedora-logos package. Needed to implement http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureGenericLogos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:06:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] New: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/grsync.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/grsync-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Grsync is a GUI (Graphical User Interface) for rsync, the commandline directory synchronization tool. It makes use of the GTK libraries and is released under the GPL license, so it is opensource. It is in beta stage and doesn't support all of rsync features, but can be effectively used to synchronize local directories. For example some people use grsync to synchronize their music collection with removable devices or to backup personal files to a networked drive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:11:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132111.l8DLBHrD002320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-13 17:11 EST ------- spec and SRPM of straw-0.27 is available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132109.l8DL9p99028961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-13 17:09 EST ------- fixed bug on comment#14 koji build succesful here is the log : [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=158166&name=build.log] Succesful build both is f7 and --scratch dist-fc7 and in dist-f8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:23:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132123.l8DLNfjB003911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] New: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bodhi.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/bodhi-0.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Bodhi is a modular web system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a software distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:33:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132133.l8DLXHAx005514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-13 17:33 EST ------- I was wondering about whether to rename qca 1.x to compat-qca or to add qca 2.x as qca2. Renaming to compat-qca would force me to update the buildrequires in depending packages, so I'd rather go with qca2, but I don't have any real preference. Is there some kind of "best practice" about that ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:43:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132143.l8DLhQPF007081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 katzj at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From katzj at redhat.com 2007-09-13 17:43 EST ------- If it's not intended to be run by the user, it may make more sense to move the binary to /usr/libexec. That said, I just built and installed it and AIM showed up as a transport and just worked in empathy. Which is pretty cool (didn't even have to restart empathy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:58:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132158.l8DLwcbi004153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-13 17:58 EST ------- Darn I'm tired... SRPM URL is: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca-ossl-0.1-2.20070706.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132156.l8DLudtf004053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-13 17:56 EST ------- (1) and (2) fixed. Sorry for the URL typo... Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca-ossl.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca-ossl-0.1-1.20070706.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 21:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289681] Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132155.l8DLtVFV004013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qca2 - Qt Cryptographic Architecture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289681 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2007-09-13 17:55 EST ------- (1) is fixed, thanks for the clues (2) is detected properly by the configure script Spec URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca2.spec SRPM URL: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/psi/qca2-2.0.0-0.2.beta7.fc7.i386.rpm It leaves (0), since we have a precedent with qca, I think it should either: - stay qca2 - be qca and qca would be renamed to compat-qca. I have no strong opinion on this, see my question in the qca-ossl bug (#289701) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 22:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132204.l8DM4gHp004907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-13 18:04 EST ------- Rebuilt in mock, here's the rpmlint output: $ for i in `ls *.rpm`; do echo; echo $i; rpmlint $i; done condor-6.9.5-0.3.20070907cvs.i386.rpm E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/execute condor E: condor non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/condor/execute 01777 E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/log condor E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/spool condor W: condor invalid-license Condor Public License condor-6.9.5-0.3.20070907cvs.src.rpm W: condor invalid-license Condor Public License condor-debuginfo-6.9.5-0.3.20070907cvs.i386.rpm W: condor-debuginfo invalid-license Condor Public License condor-static-6.9.5-0.3.20070907cvs.i386.rpm W: condor-static invalid-license Condor Public License So everything looks good (your reasoning for the condor userid is valid, same with the dir permissions), let's just wait for the license issue to be solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 23:19:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132319.l8DNJe4V019773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-13 19:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281901#c5, retain old Source > tag instead one suggested in above patch. Ok fair enough - I should have rebuilt before posting... ;) (wget doesn't handle it well either - and we probably need a better location of future releases anyway, having it on the wiki is a little disconcerting.) Please put the full URL as a comment above the Source line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 13 23:53:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709132353.l8DNrXo9023909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-13 19:53 EST ------- Updated to fix a file conflict with the js package (/usr/bin/js, see http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149840 ): Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdelibs4.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kdelibs4-3.93.0-8.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 00:30:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140030.l8E0Udb0028482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-09-13 20:30 EST ------- Note: the client is not fully functional with the current server deployment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 02:37:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140237.l8E2buUP011692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-09-13 22:37 EST ------- Thanks, Jeremy. I'm going to keep the binary in /usr/bin for the time being, as that is where other connection managers are kept (take a look at telepathy-gabble, telepathy-salut, et al. for example) and this is also where other distributions (Gentoo and Debian/Ubuntu) have them stored, also. I'll poke the Telepathy people about moving the connection manager binaries to /usr/libexec though. Thanks for the suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 03:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140303.l8E33sJ6012098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-13 23:03 EST ------- Does it make sense to gzip /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi/wqy-unibit/wqy-unibit.pcf? Most installed .pcf files seem to be compressed to .pcf.gz - though I don't know the performance implications of doing that? It would be good if upstream would version the directory in the tarball IMHO. (In reply to comment #6) > rpmlint on my FC6 did not give the "file-not-utf8" warning. Probably it is an older version of rpmlint. > Anyway, I checked > the README file, the only place could be no-ascii is the copyright symbol at > the header of the file. I removed the symbol and recompiled the rpm, the new > spec/srpm can be found at Ok, I am not sure what encoding/charset you were using for the (c) sign. > can you help me check if this solves the not-utf8 issue? Yep it does. That should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 03:13:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140313.l8E3DIRZ013637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-13 23:13 EST ------- A comment on the versioning of the tarball. Rather than wqy-unibit-bdf-1.0.0-1 I would suggest naming it say wqy-unibit-bdf-1.0.0.1 since it is a bit confusing having a release number in the upstream source file. At least for Fedora the idea is that the version number reflects all upstream changes to the source and the release number fedora specific changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 03:18:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140318.l8E3IiO0014318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-13 23:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=195561) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=195561&action=view) wqy-unibit-fonts.spec-1.patch The Fedora packaging guidelines suggest not to explicitly require fontconfig. The catalogue symlink should not be in a subdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 04:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140441.l8E4fYhu024229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-14 00:41 EST ------- * Fri Sep 14 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) 0.6.1-3 - doc files converted to UTF-8 - removed HISTORY.html README.html because they are also in xlrd/doc/ Please retest again. http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/python-xlrd.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/python-xlrd-0.6.1-3.fc7.src.rpm rpmlint is completely quiet now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 05:25:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] New: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL-data.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL-data-070909-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning. --- I will submit TnL itself for review soon and then post a link here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 05:34:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] New: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/TnL-070909-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Thunder&Lightning is a futuristic action flight simulator game that takes place in a large 3D environment. Jump into the pilot seat of your Lightning aircraft and fight against Thunder tanks in a fierce battle for control of the island! In the long run, Thunder&Lightning will incorporate features from the 80's classics Carrier Command and Midwinter. There will be multiple Islands to conquer, each with its own defense strategy. Thunder&Lightning will not be mission oriented, but there will be scripted events for each island. --- Reviewers note this package requires TnL-data whos review is bug 290421. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 05:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140539.l8E5dMTI032587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-14 01:39 EST ------- The TnL review itself is bug 290431. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 08:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140831.l8E8VYkx026006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tla at rasmil.dk ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-09-14 04:31 EST ------- Luke: You should add this to the spec file %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel %else BuildRequires: python-setuptools %endif to make it work F8 and later too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 08:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140837.l8E8b30H026696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-14 04:37 EST ------- Mamoru, my cvsextras group membership is pending. Would you please confirm my request now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 08:47:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140847.l8E8luZq025299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-09-14 04:47 EST ------- $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-server-0.2.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/tools/bodhi-client.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/tests/test_cli.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/tools/dev_init.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/tools/test-bodhi.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/tools/init.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/start-bodhi.pyo 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/start-bodhi.pyc 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/modifyrepo.py 0644 bodhi-server.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/bodhi/tools/pickledb.py 0644 look like it needs a little chmod magic to silence rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140901.l8E91eDh030067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-09-14 05:01 EST ------- $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-client-0.2.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm bodhi-client.noarch: W: no-documentation maybe the should be a README or something in the client package too. Is it on purpose that the license is GPLv2 (GPL2 only) and not GPLv2+ (GPL2 or later), the later is easier to work with. what about a COPYING gpl file ??? (shouldn't there be one in a GPL package ???) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:19:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140919.l8E9J5QB029645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-09-14 05:19 EST ------- you should use 'Requires: yum-utils >= 1.1.7' in the server package because you are using 'repoquery --repofrompath=' this is first available in yum-utils-1.1.7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:30:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140930.l8E9UC5g002078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|fontconfig |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-14 05:30 EST ------- Review Requests are always filed against "Package Review" component. Just checked Bug Activity and bugzilla comments and found that Jason is right. I mistakenly renamed bug to "Merge Review" rather to make it as "Review Request". Its almost another more than one month spent on open review(which should be closed and reopened again after license issue got solved). Anyway whenever fonts-thai package finish its packaging it have to go thru' package review and package reviews must be reported against "Package Review" component only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:35:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140935.l8E9ZNCw032395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-14 05:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > bureaucracy. > > I'm reassigning this to fontconfig, so you are not bothered by an open bug for a > real issue. If you cannot respect the fact that I don't have the free time to > follow up with this, I don't think you should be responsible for a bugzilla > product. Get a lesson on what issue tracking means. Good to ask FESCO and prove that their procedure of handling stalled reviews is WRONG. If we stop people following accepted policies then no one will try to look at bugs and thus nothing got progressed in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140941.l8E9fOD7000761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2007-09-14 05:41 EST ------- a cvs admin request from me, skasal at redhat.com, Fedora login "kasal": 1) The PackageDB contains packages "odvorace" and "jbrassow" which are obviously bogus. Would you be so kind to delete them? (Or could you please fwd the request to the authorities, if this CVS Admin request it not the right one? (I searched the wiki, but was not able to find anything better.)) 2) Perhaps a similar mistake/bug has happened in other cases as well. Could you perhaps query the db for pkgs with names == some login? Or query for pkgs which have only the name set, without any details given? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:50:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140950.l8E9oaV8004984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-09-14 05:50 EST ------- MUST: * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} ? verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) No upstream tarball to match, SRPM is upstream source. ? summary and description fine Maybe copy the main summary + description to the server package because because no binary bodhi packages is build, so the description ends up nowhere rpm -qi bodhi-server will not show much info. * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used X license text included in package and marked with %doc * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager tag not used * Vendor tag not used * Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 ? BuildRequires are proper See earlier comment. * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * no libraries * no rpath * no config files * not a GUI app * no -devel sub-package necessary * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no locale data * no cp usage so no need to worry about -p * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates ? file permissions fine See earlier comments. * %defattrs present ( %defattr(-, root, root, -)) * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs $ rpm -q -R -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-client-0.2.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/python rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 $ rpm -q -R -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-server-0.2.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/python TurboGears createrepo intltool mash python(abi) = 2.5 python-TurboMail rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 yum-utils $ rpm -q --provides -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-client-0.2.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm bodhi-client = 0.2.0-1.fc7 $ rpm -q --provides -p rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bodhi-server-0.2.0-1.fc7.noarch.rpm bodhi-server = 0.2.0-1.fc7 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs - see previous bug comments SHOULD: x package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 ? package should build in mock - I haven't tried, but I don't think it'll be a problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 09:51:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709140951.l8E9p2hg002075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tla at rasmil.dk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:07:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141007.l8EA7lXO004041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-14 06:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=195671) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=195671&action=view) shell script that can be used to remove non free parts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141026.l8EAQI1D009536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 06:26 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:25:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141025.l8EAPGiV009385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 06:25 EST ------- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:26:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141026.l8EAQSVs006397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 06:26 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] New: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The madan-fonts package contains font for the display of Nepali text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:38:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141038.l8EActAN011022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-14 06:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=195691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=195691&action=view) spec file patch that separates sub packages and remove non free Changelog could be along - subpackage packages that have a distinct upstream - remove non free parts from the archive - install xdvi icon in hicolor directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 10:53:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141053.l8EArQDI009901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-09-14 06:53 EST ------- > I use -j3 (dualcore Xeon) and it works_for_me(tm) - > do you have any idea why the error happens? I am not > a programmer, it would take me ages to figure it > out (especially when I cannot reproduce) :-( You would simply drop the %{_smp_mflags} from the spec, add a comment in the same line and be done. However, if you believe it builds fine *always*, keep the SMP make flags and expect the unexpected. Keep it until it breaks. ;) > - should I rename the library somehow and make a symlink > at the end of %install? That won't help at all, since it doesn't change the SONAME of the library, and plugins would still depend on that SONAME. It's solely a matter of API/ABI stability of libqmmp.so -- stuff that is linked against libqmmp.so requires a specific interface version of the lib, not *any* libqmmp.so. Sooner or later there may be additional plugin packages which would be built for a specific version of libqmmp, and if that is not reflected in a properly versioned library soname dependency, it is up to the packagers to hardcode versions as "Requires" in their packages manually and avoid that an upgrade of qmmp breaks plugin pkgs by changing libqmmp in incompatible ways. Don't worry yet, just be aware of the implications of a version-less soname in run-time linker's search path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 11:09:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141109.l8EB9coY011739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-14 07:09 EST ------- I have put the kpse* files back in -fonts (except for kpsewhere). They are needed by the kpathsea internal scripts. You can scratch Comment #71. With this patch I think we are near the end, though I still have 2 concerns: 1. My current understanding of kpathsea is that the library doesn't do a lot by itself, but needs all that is in texlive-fonts. What about a Requires: texlive-fonts in kpathsea? The other possibility would be to have an explicit requires on texlive-fonts by all the packages linking against kpathsea, but it seems to me to be less correct and less easy. 2. The scriptlets seem problematic, since -fonts subpackage uses main package scriptlets in %post. It is not that sure that it is a real issue, though, since maybe rpm makes sure that the main package is installed before running the -fonts post script. Even if things end up being correct, maybe it would be clearer to have fmtutil, texconfig and updmap in -fonts? I have other questions for scriptlets: * why is fmtutil/texconfig init run at install time? Isn't it enough at build time? And same for updmap? * texconfig-sys init already calls fmtutil --all (in %post latex) and updmap calls texhash * why isn't texconfig-sys init also used for the main package? And for dvips (with japanese)? If fmtutil is needed, I think that texlinks and updmap are certainly to be rerun since fmtutil may have changed the links and the maps. If running them once at build time is enough, then you can ignore this point. * I don't think that dviutils needs to call texconfig-sys rehash, nor texlive-latex I also have to check the dependencies between texlive and texlive-texmf to check that the config files are installed in a dependency of the package holding a corresponding script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 11:21:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290081] Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141121.l8EBLtVp016531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bodhi - A modular web-system that facilitates the process of publishing updates for a Fedora-based software distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290081 ------- Additional Comments From tla at rasmil.dk 2007-09-14 07:21 EST ------- when installing the bodhi-server packages everything goes into ?python_sitelib/bodhi is this the right way to do it ?? the bodhi/static should go into /usr/share/bodhi/static and bodhi/config should go into /etc/bodhi ( and maybe add some example cfg files) start-bodhi dev.cfg, should start bodhi and look for dev.cfg in /etc/bodhi/, ~/.bodhi/ or in current dir. the bodhi/tests should be exclude in the server package, unit tests don't make much sense in the binary packages (IMHO). the bodhi tools should goto the /usr/share/bodhi or be excluded from the server package is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 11:26:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 07:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262401] Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141126.l8EBQYuZ014311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-14 07:26 EST ------- Hello Jerry, Before make a full review, we may need to modify some things in the current specfile. Here is a list of stuff that should be fixed before we can review package. - The package naming don't fit with the Packaging/NamingGuidline, I think that this package fit good with pre-release package naming. Version: 0 Release: 2006xxxx.1%{?dist} http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a - To build the javadoc for F8 (IcedTea is in rawhide), you can use the %fedora macro to check for witch release of Fedora the package is build -> %if "%{fedora}" >= "8". - Group tag is not correct, Development/Libraries seems to be the one to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 12:59:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141259.l8ECxhD9026079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmz at pobox.com ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2007-09-14 08:59 EST ------- Hi Marcela, The License tag for the GNU Free Documentation License should be GFDL rather than FDL[1]. Otherwise rpmlint will still flag the license as invalid. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-19fc3ef10add085a28cb06784dc34ef8b05a9bd6-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:17:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141317.l8EDHeVM029441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 09:17 EST ------- Okay, now quicksynergy itself is okay. So would you do a pre-review or submit another review request (my comment 5)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:40:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141340.l8EDe0pl002951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:39:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141339.l8EDdkcT002897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:40:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141340.l8EDeTif003355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:40:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141340.l8EDedAQ003406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:41:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 263181] Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141341.l8EDf6fx000485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-Svn - PHP Subversion Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263181 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:41:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141341.l8EDfX5h000538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141340.l8EDeLH6000385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:40:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141340.l8EDeoqO000444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] New: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfarrellee at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/gsoap.spec SRPM URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/gsoap-2.7.9-0.1.k.src.rpm Description: The gSOAP Web services development toolkit offers an XML to C/C++ language binding to ease the development of SOAP/XML Web services in C and C/C++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 13:55:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141355.l8EDtfSV005693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 09:55 EST ------- * disttag - Please consider to use %?dist tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * Redundant Requires/BuildRequires - Please remove redundant Requires/BuildRequires. For example, gnome-python2-gconf requires gnome-python2, so "Requires: gnome-python2" is not needed. - And why this package should have "Requires: pygtk2-devel" (not BuildRequires)? * Conflicts - Please explain why you set "conflicts: python-adns". The valid cases of using "Conflicts" are in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts * GConf - GConf schemas files should still be under %_sysconfdir/gconf/schemas, not under %_datadir (and don't mark as %config). - And please check GConf scriptlets again. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * %pre, %post and %preun scriptlets are needed * [NAME] must be replaced with the actual gconf file's name. * Note: "killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :" is no longer needed. (see the last "Notes" in GConf scriptlet section). * srpm indentation - rpmlint shows ----------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost straw]$ rpmlint straw-0.27-5.src.rpm straw.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 82, tab: line 5) [tasaka1 at localhost straw]$ rpmlint -I mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs : The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 14:53:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141453.l8EErYJL011109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-14 10:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libzzub Short Description: Powerful music sequencing library Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 15:21:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141521.l8EFLX2x015990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 11:21 EST ------- For 0.8-2: - First of all, please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python for general information of spec file for python modules. You can try - install rpmdevtools - try "$ rpmdev-newspec -t python foo" to get skeleton spec file for python modules. Then: * Please write full source URL * Does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=158842 python-devel is missing from BuildRequires (python skeleton spec file contains this) * "Requires: python >= 2.5" is automatically checked by rpmbuild dependency check and is not needed * We recommend "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" * And fix up %files entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 15:24:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141524.l8EFOUxe018874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2007-09-14 11:24 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: [nothing] - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - no locales - not relocatable - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 15:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141530.l8EFUZjW020036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 11:30 EST ------- By the way - This package does not contain any license text and some source files have no license term. Would you ask upstream about license clarification? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 15:47:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] New: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bernie at codewiz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/olpc-bernie/specs/abyssinica-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/olpc-bernie/source/abyssinica-fonts-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: SIL Abyssinica is a Unicode typeface family containing glyphs for the Ethiopic script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:08:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] New: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: osspkg at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/xml/xgrep/xgrep.spec SRPM URL: http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/xml/xgrep/xgrep-0.06-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: xgrep provides facilities for searching content in XML files. The search is specified either as an XPath via the -x flag, or a custom syntax, including extended regular expressions, via the -s flag. Multiple input files may be specified; if none are provided, input is read from stdin. A sponsor is needed as this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:07:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141607.l8EG7nMG023308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-14 12:07 EST ------- rpmlint output W: abyssinica-fonts invalid-license SIL Open Font License SIL OFL is however an approved license according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and this is most likely caused by an outdated rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:08:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141608.l8EG8h3k023395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |johnp at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141609.l8EG9liT023540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 osspkg at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:25:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141625.l8EGPBhq028312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-14 12:25 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. W: abyssinica-fonts invalid-license SIL Open Font License wave this as above - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok (OFL) - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. ok - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Ok - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). Ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Issue, upstream only provides a .zip file. We will need to convert to .tar.gz - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Ok - noarch - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Ok - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Ok - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Ok (no translations) - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Ok (No %{_libdir} libraries) - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Ok (package not relocatable) - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. Ok - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. Ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Ok - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Ok(no large docs) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Ok - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Ok(No libraries) - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Ok (No static libraries) - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Ok (No pkgconfig) - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Ok (no libraries) - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Ok(No devel) - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Ok (No Libraries) - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Ok (no .desktop file) - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Ok - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. Ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Ok SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Ok - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:29:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141629.l8EGTLUX026419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-14 12:29 EST ------- issues in review: The download page only provides a .zip. Please note that we need to convert to a tar.bz2 in the comment above the URL line. Fix that and I will approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 16:50:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226223] Merge Review: ORBit2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141650.l8EGouZV030175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ORBit2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226223 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mclasen at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 17:16:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141716.l8EHGboS032611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-14 13:16 EST ------- For 3.3.1-3: - Please check your rpms by rpmlint (in rpmlint package) before submitting. - And also consider to reduce total spec file. For example * Use glob (*) in %files entry when possible. This surely makes spec files more readable and reduces many mistakes. * Also, you can use %exclude macro Then: * Redundant Requires - Please consider if explicit version requirements are really required. Currently we only support FC6+, and --------------------------------------------------- Package requirement by FC6 version ths package autoconf 2.59 2.59-12 gtk2 2.8 2.10.13-1.fc6 bwidegt 1.8 1.8.0-1.fc6 python 2.3 2.4.4-1.fc6 libsepol 1.12.27 1.15.3-1.fc6 libselinux 1.30 1.33.4-2.fc6 sqlite 3.2.0 3.3.6-2 swig 1.3.28 1.3.31-0.fc6 tcl 8.4.9 8.4.13-3.fc6 ---------------------------------------------------- * Other requires issue ---------------------------------------------------- Requires: setools-libs >= %{version}-%{release} ---------------------------------------------------- - Why is this >= ? * unstripped ELF binaries - Still lots of ELF binaries are not stripped. For example ----------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint setools-gui setools-gui.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/setools/apol_tcl/libapol_tcl.so.4.1.1 ----------------------------------------------------- And these binaries does not have executable permission, which must be fixed. As I said in my comment 4, - The permission of these binaries have to be fixed *manually* before %install stage finishes, like: ----------------------------------------------------- chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libdir/%name/apol_tcl/libapol_tcl.so.*.*.* ----------------------------------------------------- * Unowned directories - Please check directory ownership again. For example, %_libdir/setools is not owned by any package. NOTE: - Please consider to write just directory name like: ------------------------------------------------------ %files foo/ ------------------------------------------------------- when possible. This means - the directory foo/ itself - and all files/directories/etc under foo/ so this automatically checks directory ownership issue and this format surely reduces mistakes for directory ownership issue. * python directories macro ------------------------------------------------------- %define pkgpyexecdir %{_libdir}/python?.?/site-packages/setools %define pkgpythondir %{_exec_prefix}/lib*/python?.?/site-packages/setools ------------------------------------------------------- - Use %python_sitelib or %python_sitearch. Check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python * files in setools metapackage - These files cannot be installed when setools package is explicitly excluded and in this case COPYING file and so on is not installed. All files in setools metapackage should be moved to other subpackages (mostly in -libs subpackage). * desktop file check - Rebuild fails on desktop-file-install (as said in previous comment). * libdir in pkgconfig .pc file - For example, even on x86_64, %_libdir/pkgconfig/libapol.pc says: --------------------------------------------------------- prefix=/usr exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib ---------------------------------------------------------- On 64bits, libdir must be /usr/lib64, not /usr/lib. * Macros - Still /usr/share is used on -gui %files entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 17:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141756.l8EHudfe006164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-14 13:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 18:06:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291371] New: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291371 Summary: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheese at nosuchhost.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/teg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/teg-0.11.2-4.fc7.src.rpm Description: Tenes Emapandas Graciela (TEG) is a clone of 'Plan T??ctico y Estrat??gico de la Guerra', which is a pseudo-clone of Risk, a multiplayer turn-based strategy game. Some rules are different. I need a Sponsor. Should I convert the original AUTHORS and README-files to UTF8 or leave them as they were upstream??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 18:23:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141823.l8EINngC010060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-14 14:23 EST ------- Thank you Nils for doing the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-GnuPGInterface Short Description: A Python module to interface with GnuPG Owners: robert Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 19:01:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141901.l8EJ1BWx015594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-14 15:01 EST ------- Thanks for catching this! I've marked the packages removed and am updating the UI code to ignore their existence. Scanned the DB for packages which had a similar lack of other details and found none. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 19:05:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141905.l8EJ5Z3T018399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bkonrath at redhat.com 2007-09-14 15:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-egit Short Description: Eclipse Git plugin Owners: bkonrath Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 19:13:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141913.l8EJD4sD017220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-14 15:13 EST ------- Fixed the uniformity of %{name} as suggested by Debarshi Ray -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 19:36:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709141936.l8EJaMqD022855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From michael at laptop.org 2007-09-14 15:36 EST ------- This is a pre-version-1.0 snapshot (which I designated as release 0.3) because the high-level binding (pyvserver) is not yet feature-complete. However, since I am the upstream developer, I can certainly use a different release naming scheme if Fedora so requires. Also, I'm not sure that I understand your question about the tarball's name. Are you saying that it should be named something like pyvserver-1.0-0.3.tar.gz? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 20:10:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142010.l8EKA8VT027598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-14 16:10 EST ------- The Obsolete is right, as explained by Michael Schwendt, it allows to rename the package while still updating to the latest version. Still 2 issues remaining: Is the Buildrequires: autoconf >= 2.52 needed? I don't think so. Otherwise could you please precise what is covered by MIT in a comment for example? In my opinion the documentation is under OFSFDL, this should be added, with a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 20:10:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142010.l8EKAsfT025750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 20:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142033.l8EKXq5b028642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-14 16:33 EST ------- The package looks fine, except the %post, %pre, and %preun scriptlets. 1) Do you really intend on doing --makefile-install-rule in all three places? Probably not. 2) You should avoid difficult-to-maintain long lists of plugins that are redundant in the three scriptlets. You could do something like the compiz package with: %define core_plugins blur clone cube dbus decoration fade ini inotify minimize move for f in %{core_plugins}; do echo %{_libdir}/compiz/lib$f.so echo %{_datadir}/compiz/$f.xml done >> core-files.txt Then use a loop within the scriptlets to install or uninstall the schemas. export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`/usr/bin/gconftool-2 --get-default-source` for f in %{core_plugins} %{gnome_plugins} core; do gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/compiz-$f.schemas >& /dev/null || : done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 20:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142041.l8EKf8hF029946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-14 16:41 EST ------- The Conflict should certainly be an obsolete. And maybe an Obsolete for 1.7.9? Seems that the texinfo-tex BR is needed for a test? It should be said so in a comment. The BR autoconf is needed. It is a bit strange in my opinion, but it is upstream choice. License is wrong. README AUTHORS THANKS missing in %doc Also a comment for ./configure should be nice. And lastly it would be nice to have the info file available. I can try a patch for that if you want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 20:48:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142048.l8EKmRtR030777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-14 16:48 EST ------- In fact the Conflict is certainly right. But the Obsolete should certainly be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 21:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142105.l8EL5iTJ000907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 21:05:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142105.l8EL5bWJ000847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-14 17:05 EST ------- Please fix the issues mentioned in Bug #253692 for this package as well then we can proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 21:24:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142124.l8ELO3XM004494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-14 17:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 21:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142127.l8ELRpwJ003553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-14 17:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 21:40:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142140.l8ELetSL005388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-14 17:40 EST ------- What's the current licensing situation? Are we going to be stuck with the stale tetex for another Fedora release? :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:15:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142215.l8EMFIbh009729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-09-14 18:15 EST ------- Ok, I put a first version of afio and buffer packages at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora-extras/afio-2.5-1.src.rpm and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora-extras/buffer-1.19-1.src.rpm I guess there will be some remarks (I tried to do my best with rpmlint remarks) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:17:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 265381] Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142217.l8EMHdSB009830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-GnuPGInterface - A Python module to interface with GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=265381 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-14 18:17 EST ------- Package: python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-2.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: robert Package: python-GnuPGInterface-0.3.2-2.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Build Result: 36343 - python-GnuPGInterface on fedora-6-extras Build Result: 36344 - python-GnuPGInterface on fedora-5-epel Build Result: 36345 - python-GnuPGInterface on fedora-4-epel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:19:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254093] Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142219.l8EMJtCa011573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142222.l8EMMYua012197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec at hp.com 2007-09-14 18:22 EST ------- I've removed the % in my svn version. I made summary shorter also in SVN. spec file should now be UTF-8. I'll try to shorten the log and remove the svn.log as well. For the License, how to you handle compatibility with previous versions of fedora ? If I put GPLv2, and tr to build on an older version rpmlint will say it doesn't exists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142219.l8EMJvOL011630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Bug 254016 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:19:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142219.l8EMJu7f011602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Bug 254015 depends on bug 254093, which changed state. Bug 254093 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake - Ruby based make-like utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 22:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291661] New: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291661 Summary: Review Request: asylum - SDL port of the game Asylum, originally for the Archimedes Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/asylum.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/asylum-0.2.2-1.src.rpm Description: SDL Asylum is a C port of the computer game Asylum, which was written by Andy Southgate in 1994 for the Acorn Archimedes and is now public domain. The object is to find things that look like brain cells and shut them down! The game revolves around shooting anything which moves, collecting anything which doesn't move and most importantly, finding your way to each of the eight pulsating neurons scattered through the immense map. Note: It is currently excludearch ppc/ppc64 probably because of many endian issues. It's also setgid games because of the global hiscore table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 23:20:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291721] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291721 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richip at richip.dhs.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://richip.dhs.org/~richip/gnome-hearts.spec SRPM URL: http://richip.dhs.org/~richip/gnome-hearts-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: gnome-hearts is an implementation of the game of Hearts for Gnome. The implementation is still at its infancy but the game is currently playable. This is also an early attempt to be active in the Fedora community. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 23:24:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291741] New: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richip at richip.dhs.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://richip.dhs.org/~richip/gnome-hearts.spec SRPM URL: http://richip.dhs.org/~richip/gnome-hearts-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: gnome-hearts is an implementation of the game of Hearts for Gnome. The implementation is still at its infancy but the game is currently playable. This is also an early attempt to be active in the Fedora community. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 23:34:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291741] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142334.l8ENYbFg020747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-14 19:34 EST ------- *** Bug 291721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 14 23:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291721] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709142334.l8ENYaDp020723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291721 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-14 19:34 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 291741 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 00:09:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150009.l8F09FI3024983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-14 20:09 EST ------- I found a bug in the bdf merging scripts and now there are 80 more glyphs added to the font. I bumped the minor version number and rename the submitted package to 1.1.0-1. the new files can be found at Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-1.src.rpm the spec file was patched, and the README file was cleaned. To your questions, gzip the font is not preferred. There has been numerous report on the performance degradation using the gzipped wqy-bitmapsong in the past, for example, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384149 For big bitmap fonts (with more than 10000 glyphs), gzip the pcf file will produce noticeable latency when firefox loading webpages, causing the CPU load surging to 100%. If space is not a big issue, leaving the font un-zipped is preferred. Need to mention, the best bitmap format is SFNT TTF/OTF, in this case, it will only take <1M and has faster rendering. however, currently freetype/fontconfig does not support this format very well, please see http://www.nabble.com/SFNT-TTF-support-in-fontconfig-tf2132908.html#a5886457 On upstream version number, it is true that our current numbering scheme is different from Fedora's and some others. The last number is an accumulative major release number, rather than the update number for a particular release. However, to change this may cause some other problems, such as nightly build and cvs. So, let's leave it for now, and for packages submitted to Fedora, simply ignore the last number from upstream and use the update number instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 06:21:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150621.l8F6L9BB002912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mondo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-15 02:21 EST ------- PLease add an URL for new src.rpm for next review. You can update rpmlint on FC6 and F7 to display proper information. I think it is not important, what shows old rpmlint on non-supported fedoras. The package will be compatible with any versions of Fedora older than FC6 with any License tag, because there was no LicensingGuidelines for these fedoras. Another way can be rebuild of rpmlint for your older fedora, if you want, but it is highly recommended to upgrade all non-supported Fedoras asap. Because they have no updates, I think it is not required to make new backups of these systems. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 07:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150700.l8F701ej006817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 ------- Additional Comments From daace at gmx.de 2007-09-15 03:00 EST ------- Thank you so much, Nicolas! I'm looking forward to installing Fedora 8 and using Filezilla w/o any problems! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 08:03:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150803.l8F83FGo014851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-15 04:03 EST ------- Fixed in: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-0.5.2-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 08:03:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150803.l8F83VvG013013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 08:04:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150804.l8F84mOh015039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-15 04:04 EST ------- Fixed here: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/compiz-fusion-extras-0.5.2-5.fc7.src.rpm also fixed the build problems reported above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 08:19:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150819.l8F8J0I2015157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-15 04:18 EST ------- The licensing is now right for the texlive package. For texlive-texmf I think it is right too, unless I am wrong Spot did an audit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 09:16:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150916.l8F9GgwT022763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-15 05:16 EST ------- He did an audit, which is how the issues have been found in the first place, my question is whether these are or are being resolved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 09:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709150947.l8F9lhFS028667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-15 05:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #39) > He did an audit, which is how the issues have been found in the first place, my > question is whether these are or are being resolved! afaik, there are no outstanding licence issues on the tex-live to-do list. there have been one or two packages removed from the repository since the distribution at the beginning of the year. if there are others known, forwarding the details to tex-live at tug.org would be welcome, otherwise nothing will change. fwiw, debian are already distributing tex-live, having done some pretty rigorous work on licensing. which isn't to say they can't have missed anything... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 10:05:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709151005.l8FA5F2q029187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-15 06:05 EST ------- Have you seen this list? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00014.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 16:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] New: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes.spec SRPM URL: http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: "boxes" can draw all kinds of boxes around its input text, ranging from a C comment box to complex ASCII art. These boxes may also be removed, even if they have been badly damaged by editing of the text inside. Since boxes may be open on any side, "boxes" can also be used to create regional comments in any programming language. With the help of an editor macro or mapping, damaged boxes can easily be repaired. New box designs of all sorts can easily be added and shared by appending to a free format configuration file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 17:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709151711.l8FHBoBF015071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-09-15 13:11 EST ------- Hello, I had a quick look at your package (not an official review, just to ease the work of the real reviewer), here are the results: Key: - = does not apply for this package x = OK ! = Problem === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - the Source0 tag is wrong. It should include full URL to the sources [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: x86 [x] Rpmlint output: -clean [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included i [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : MD5SUM upstream package: [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. - missing libxml2-devel [-] The spec file handles locales properly. - no locales [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [!] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: RHEL5 i686 [not tested] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: x86 [x] Package functions as described. - tested only very basic functions [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. does not rebuild in mock because of missing BR libxml2-devel 2. does not include full source URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 17:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709151719.l8FHJ1wV015708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-15 13:19 EST ------- A mock build fails in ptex. It seems that it needs ptex.tex min10.tfm which maybe are in the texmf part. I have not fully investigated, but maybe ptex should in a completely separate srpm? It would also simplify a lot the specs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 17:25:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709151725.l8FHPkUX014899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-15 13:25 EST ------- I propose the following additions to the texmf substitutions: %{__sed} -i 's?^TEXMF =.*?TEXMF = {$TEXMFCONFIG,$TEXMFVAR,$TEXMFHOME,$TEXMFSYSCONFIG,!!$TEXMFSYSVAR,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFMAIN,!!$TEXMFDIST}?' %{__sed} -i 's?^TEXMFLOCAL =.*?TEXMFLOCAL = %{_texmf_local}?' Also context.cnf is quite different from texmf.cnf. Is it an issue? I think not, since it is additional to texmf.cnf. There is a -p missing for the first install. in the tkdefaults patch, the defaults should be like in texlive and the appropriate Requires set. Instead of doing a link for the cmap ghostscript resources I think that the texmf.cnf should be changed. Also I think that # move the configuration files and symlink them is wrong. Better leave as is. mktex.cnf should certainly be under the sole user control, and in /etc/texmf/web2c The common package may also be called texlive-common and it should certainly be in Requires for more packages, for example texlive, texlive-fonts, texlive-dvips, xdvi, mendexk, dvipdfmx. The install-info should not have .gz and have || :. The scriptlet commands should be in Requires(...). I hope that rpm can figure out that the binary package has in fact to be installed before the texmf package to be able to run the scriptlet. Also it seems to me that at least updmap should be run as a texmf package scriptlet, and not as the main package scriptlet, since all that updmap needs is in the texmf packages, including the config file. As usual I can do patch for these issues (except for the scriptlets, this needs more discussion). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 18:24:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709151824.l8FIOdHI021256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253691 stickster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stickster at gmail.com Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora_requires_release_note |? |+ ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2007-09-15 14:24 EST ------- Definitely should be included in the F8 Release Notes. The Docs Project could use some help in including the content, since we are very short on manpower at the moment. You can edit content on this page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Java Edits will be picked up by a number of channels we have for notification, so we will see it, do any grammar/style editing necessary, and pass it on to translators. If any knowledgeable individual on this bug's CC list could do this in the next 72 hours, that would be very helpful. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 19:13:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709151913.l8FJDaUs026938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-15 15:13 EST ------- After a quick look, it looks like ptex can only be build within a full web2c build. This could be a reason for reintroducing the dependency on the texmf package. Another possibility could be to install only the needed files in a place where they would be searched for during the build. Another possibility could be to drop the ptex support since it should really be integrated upstream and not in fedora. The debian solution is to add a package with stripped down tetex sources. This is also possible, but a fair amount of work. Another possibility would be to package ptex separately, with the main texlive source, and only build ptex in this srpm. This seems to me to be the cleanest way, in fact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 21:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709152121.l8FLLPdQ013064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-15 17:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > Also it seems to me that at least updmap should be run as a > texmf package scriptlet, and not as the main package scriptlet, > since all that updmap needs is in the texmf packages, including > the config file. why bother? where should one draw the line between applications (like tex) and tools like (texhash)? where should kpsewhich live -- obviously a tool, but implemented as a compiled program? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 21:26:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709152126.l8FLQlS2012276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-15 17:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > Have you seen this list? > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00014.html yes, and read the responses to it. it occurs to me to wonder whether the old tetex rpms ought to be subject to the same treatment. (a lot of packages have changed since then, and we try to guide people towards free licences when updates are submitted to the archive.) for sure, two of the packages mentioned (fancybox.sty and multicol.sty) are essentially identical (though i'm with frank mittelbach in thinking that the complaint about multicol.sty is spurious). (fwiw, if you remove multicol, you should remove latex, since the latex team list multicol as a required package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 15 23:37:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709152337.l8FNbFVl030350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-09-15 19:37 EST ------- Thanks for your unofficial review. I have addressed the issues you identified and uploaded a new package and spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 01:36:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160136.l8G1at19015514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-15 21:36 EST ------- Well, spot has apparently cleared the multicol license upon rereading, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00017.html This leaves: * Literat license - what's up with that one? Should the affected files just be removed? * AFPL font files: already removed upstream as per: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00030.html (they're just old versions of the GPLed GhostScript fonts) but need to be removed downstream (in the Fedora package) too if there isn't yet any new release tarball from upstream without these. * The 2 files (fancybox.sty and pcatcode.sty) under Artistic v1. Spot: Does texlive really have to be blocked for this one? Considering these are both already in the existing tetex packages, keeping texlive on hold won't actually fix the problem. Plus, there are still other packages with Artistic v1 files in them too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 03:08:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160308.l8G38o3J026182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-15 23:08 EST ------- That is great news. I've forwarded the info to Willy upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 03:39:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160339.l8G3dI43031860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-15 23:39 EST ------- * disttag - Please consider to use %?dist tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag - Fixed the issue * GConf - GConf schemas files should still be under %_sysconfdir/gconf/schemas, not under %_datadir (and don't mark as %config). -- fixed the isssue - And please check GConf scriptlets again. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * %pre, %post and %preun scriptlets are needed,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, -- fixed this part * srpm indentation - rpmlint shows -- Fixed rpmlint warning [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 04:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160401.l8G41Suc002638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-16 00:01 EST ------- Will review this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 04:28:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160428.l8G4SvJq006185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-09-16 00:28 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 05:00:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160500.l8G50ItH009206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-16 01:00 EST ------- Please change release number every time you fix your spec file. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes And please post full URL of your spec/srpm on this bugzilla so that we can directly download them by "wget -N". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 05:32:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160532.l8G5WBjn014112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-16 01:32 EST ------- Well, currently no one is reviewing? For 3.5-4: * Redundand BuildRequires - "pango-devel" is required by "gtk2-devel", so "BuildRequires: pango-devel" is not needed. * Possibly missing BuildRequires - From: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=159663 build log says -------------------------------------------------------- checking libofx/libofx.h usability... no checking libofx/libofx.h presence... no checking for libofx/libofx.h... no Libofx header missing. Check your libofx installation checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes --------------------------------------------------------- At least "libofx-devel" is missing from BuildRequires. * Macros - Use macros. /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. * Scriptlets (Please refer to : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) - The desktop file contains MimeType info and update-desktop-database must be called. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 06:23:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 02:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160623.l8G6NQkX022841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-16 02:23 EST ------- Thanks for your comments :) I've corrected these few things, new URLs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/homebank/homebank-3.5-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 07:13:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160713.l8G7D8I9029963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-16 03:13 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (homebank) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 07:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160720.l8G7KBoB029631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-16 03:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: homebank Short Description: Free easy personal accounting for all Owners: johan at x-tnd.be Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: johan at x-tnd.be Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 07:52:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] New: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-amb-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-amb-plugins-0.3.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A set of first order Ambisonics plugins I use with Ardour. Included are: mono and stereo input panner, horizontal rotation, and square and hexagon horizontal decoders. See the README for more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 08:27:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 04:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] New: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-blop-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-blop-plugins-0.2.8-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: BLOP comprises a set of LADSPA plugins that generate bandlimited sawtooth, square, variable pulse and slope-variable triangle waves, for use in LADSPA hosts, principally for use with one of the many modular software synthesisers available. They are wavetable based, and are designed to produce output with harmonic content as high as possible over a wide pitch range. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 08:52:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 04:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] New: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 08:55:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 04:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160855.l8G8tj23008625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu Summary|Review Request: ladspa-caps-|Review Request: ladspa-caps- |plugins - |Plugin Suite ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-16 04:55 EST ------- Ugh, that was not supposed to happen, here is the correct review request: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-caps-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-caps-plugins-0.4.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: caps, the C* Audio Plugin Suite, is a collection of refined LADSPA units including instrument amplifier emulation, stomp-box classics, versatile 'virtual analog' oscillators, fractal oscillation, reverb, equalization and others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 09:00:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292381] New: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292381 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-cmt-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-cmt-plugins-1.15-6.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Computer Music Toolkit (CMT) is a collection of LADSPA plugins for use with software synthesis and recording packages on Linux. See the license before use. The CMT is developed primarily by Richard W.E. Furse the principle designer of the LADSPA standard, with additional plugins by Jezar and David Bartold. If you are a programmer or can write documentation and would like to help out, please feel free to contact Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 09:18:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230161] Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160918.l8G9IO2B011573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61-firmware - Firmware for RT61 802.11 wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2007-09-16 05:18 EST ------- I just downloaded the firmware zip from #13 and that contained both the firmware and a license equal to that found in #11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 09:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709160917.l8G9HWUA011474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-16 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > Well, spot has apparently cleared the multicol license upon rereading, see: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00017.html great. > This leaves: > * Literat license - what's up with that one? Should the affected files just be > removed? i would recommend not bothering with it. it's a small russian foundry (sfaict) and there seems to have been a long history to getting them onto the archive, so we just installed them when they arrived recently. i doubt they'll make the next release of tex-live, with that licence, so as well for redhat to ignore them. > * AFPL font files: already removed upstream as per: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007-August/msg00030.html > (they're just old versions of the GPLed GhostScript fonts) but need to be > removed downstream (in the Fedora package) too if there isn't yet any new > release tarball from upstream without these. ah. i wonder if there's something i need to do on the archive... > * The 2 files (fancybox.sty and pcatcode.sty) under Artistic v1. Spot: Does > texlive really have to be blocked for this one? Considering these are both > already in the existing tetex packages, keeping texlive on hold won't actually > fix the problem. Plus, there are still other packages with Artistic v1 files in > them too. there is a copy of fancybox on ctan that has been relicensed under lppl www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/seminar/inputs/fancybox.sty but there are two under artistic v1 as well (presumably) as .doc files. i'll get those sorted out. (the author is incommunicado, but he's told seb rahtz to "deal with his stuff" as necessary, i think.) the present situation is ludicrous, so something needs to be done. pcatcode is weird: everything else published by the ams is under lppl, so it's not clear to me what happened there. i've had recent mail from barb beeton, so she's active in some sense -- will mail her to ask what's going on. (we can't just change pcatcode, since we mirror it from the ams.) (nb, texlive _does_ still need work, even if the licensing is sorted: witness my first two posts to this thread.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 11:00:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709161100.l8GB0DLa022823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-16 07:00 EST ------- FYI, GCJ crash[1] during the native build of org.eclipse.dstore.extra bundle, look that resoable to disable native build while this bug is not solved? Spec: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eclipse-rse.spec SRPM: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eclipse-rse-2.0.1-5.fc7.src.rpm * Thu Sep 13 2007 Alphonse Van Assche 2.0.1-5 - Let all bundles packed. - With IcedTea org.apache.oro and org.apache.commons.net don't give troubles when the javadoc is builded. - Add remotecdt sub package. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 14:18:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709161418.l8GEIGD2014120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-16 10:18 EST ------- * fixed release tag * spec file and SRPM ar available at -- [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw.spec] -- [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw-0.27-6.fc7.src.rpm] * noarch rpm is available at -- [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw-0.27-6.fc7.noarch.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 18:58:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 14:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252128] Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709161858.l8GIwL1O013242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-haze - A multi-protocol Libpurple connection manager for Telepathy Alias: telepathy-haze https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252128 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2007-09-16 14:58 EST ------- 0.1.2 is out; I've bumped my packaging accordingly. The spec file is at the same URL, and the source RPM is: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/telepathy-haze-0.1.2-1.src.rpm * Sun Sep 16 2007 Peter Gordon - 0.1.2-1 - Update to new upstream release (0.1.2), which fixes sending messages with <, >, and & characters and properly cleans up zombie children. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 21:18:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709162118.l8GLIfhb029666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-16 17:18 EST ------- Please use your fedora account system name instead of email moving forward... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 21:52:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269441] Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709162152.l8GLq67b032669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269441 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-09-16 17:52 EST ------- This package already exists. See: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/devel/dvgrab/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 23:19:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:19:32 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230161=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt61pci-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2561/RT2661_A/B/G_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709162319.l8GNJWnl011254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61pci-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: rt61- |Review Request: rt61pci- |firmware - Firmware for RT61|firmware - Firmware for |802.11 wireless devices |Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G | |network adaptors ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-16 19:19 EST ------- SRPM: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/rt2x00-firmware/rt61pci-firmware-1.2-4.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/rt2x00-firmware/rt61pci-firmware.spec Description: Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptor %changelog - Disable dist tag - Preserve timestamp - Add license from Ralink - Improved summary and description (taken from iwl4965-firmware scheme ) We can remove FE-Legal as the bundled firmware was provided! I need someone to review the package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 16 23:26:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:26:58 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230164=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt73usb-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2571W/RT2671_A/B/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709162326.l8GNQwOT011316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: rt71w- |Review Request: rt73usb- |firmware - Firmware for RT71|firmware - Firmware for |802.11 wireless devices |Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 | |A/B/G network adaptors ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-16 19:26 EST ------- SRPM: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/rt2x00-firmware/rt73usb-firmware-1.8-4.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/rt2x00-firmware/rt73usb-firmware.spec Description: Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors %changelog - Disable dist tag - Preserve timestamp - Add license from Ralink - Improved summary and description (taken from iwl4965-firmware scheme ) We can remove FE-Legal as the bundled firmware was provided! (license is approved by Tom "spot" Callaway in #230161 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 04:19:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170419.l8H4JAjA011945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-17 00:19 EST ------- To make this easier to review, here's the SRPM for the required version of kde-filesystem: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/kde-filesystem-3.92-9.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 04:34:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] New: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader-0.8.6d-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: FBReader is an e-book reader, with the following main features: * Supports several formats: fb2, HTML, CHM, plucker, Palmdoc, zTxt (Weasel), TCR (psion), RTF, OEB, OpenReader, mobipocket, plain text. * Direct reading from tar, zip, gzip and bzip2 archives. (Multiple books in one archive are supported.) * Automatic library building. * Automatic encoding detection is supported. * Automatically generated contents table. * Embedded images support. * Footnotes/hyperlinks support. * Position indicator. * Keeps the last open book and the last read positions for all opened books between runs. * List of last opened books. * Automatic hyphenations. Liang's algorithm is used. The same algorithm is used in TeX, and TeX hyphenation patterns are used in FBReader. Patterns for Czech, English, Esperanto, French, German and Russian are included in the current version. * Text search. * Full-screen mode. * Screen rotation by 90, 180 and 270 degrees. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 07:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170756.l8H7ue7r006071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 03:56 EST ------- I removed my request to release micq to stable updates, because micq has been renamed to climm. New spec and SRPM can be found here: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/climm.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/climm-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Changelog: * Mon Sep 17 2007 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 0.6-1 - package renamed to climm - glibc-open patch updated for new name - added obsolete for micq What to do now? Do I need to open a new Review request for climm and close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:07:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170807.l8H876Gb007435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |292821 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170810.l8H8AUwE008503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 04:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, do avoid confusion, s/do/to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:10:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170810.l8H8A4kX008454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u- | |tokyo.ac.jp) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 04:10 EST ------- Well, do avoid confusion, please close this bug again and open a new review request for climm, and add me to CC-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:23:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170823.l8H8NPd7009661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-17 04:23 EST ------- License tag has been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:27:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170827.l8H8R9wG010324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2007-09-17 04:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > You would simply drop the %{_smp_mflags} from the spec, add > a comment in the same line and be done. However, if you believe > it builds fine *always*, keep the SMP make flags and expect > the unexpected. Keep it until it breaks. ;) I know that dropping parallel compilation would help, but I would like to see a real solution, not just workaround ... if this beast builds on all of my systems (which include two Gentoo boxes using distcc and cross-compiling, old AMD Duron vs Intel Core2 Duo) and it fails on your box then we should find what is "wrong" on your system I do not know what is the official Fedora policy in this case, but I would like to know whether it builds in Brew (or what is currently used?) - if not, then smp has to be removed, if it builds, then I would let it go ... being aware of the bug and eager to resolve it with the help of the affected users > Don't worry yet, just be aware of the implications of a version-less > soname in run-time linker's search path. this is no problem for me, but if 3rd party plugin comes and someone else packages it ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:46:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170846.l8H8k4fv013624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:46:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170846.l8H8k6bN013651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 Bug 275851 depends on bug 275831, which changed state. Bug 275831 Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] New: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ondrejj at salstar.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/climm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/climm-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: climm is a portable, small, yet powerful console based ICQ client. It supports password changing, auto-away, creation of new accounts, searching, file transfer, acknowledged messages, SMS, client identification, logging, scripting, transcoding, multi-UIN usage and other features that makes it a very complete yet simple internationalized client supporting the current ICQ v8 protocol. It now also supports the XMPP protocol as well as OTR encrypted messages. It has leading support for (ICQ2002+/ICQ Lite/ICQ2go) unicode encoded messages unreached by other ICQ clones. A lot of other ICQ clients are based in spirit on climm, nevertheless climm is still _the_ console based ICQ client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:58:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170858.l8H8wbjk014589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 04:58 EST ------- rpmlint says: climm.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes micq climm.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/climm-0.6/example-climm-event-script climm.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided micq Do I need to make explicit Obsoletes when I need to replace micq with climm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:59:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170859.l8H8xNdv015362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 04:59 EST ------- *** Bug 256341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 08:59:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170859.l8H8xMGQ015338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 04:59 EST ------- Closing this bug as duplicate with climm review request. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 292851 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:10:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170910.l8H9Af7x017188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-17 05:10 EST ------- As libzzub is in Bodhi for testing now, I'm going to take care of all the issues mentioned. I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Thus, in my understanding pyzzub inherits libzzub's license as it is co-packaged and all files without license texts have been generated. The file library.py provided is GPLv2+. Please tell me if you still think we need clarification from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:16:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170916.l8H9GLAO018000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 05:16 EST ------- I will review later. (In reply to comment #1) > Do I need to make explicit Obsoletes when I need to replace micq with climm? Yes, and also having Provides: is preferable. Check the section "Renaming/replacing existing packages" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:34:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170934.l8H9Yusf020811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 Bug 275851 depends on bug 275831, which changed state. Bug 275831 Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:34:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170934.l8H9Yt5N020787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 05:34 EST ------- Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:34:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170934.l8H9YKAb019742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 05:34 EST ------- *** Bug 275851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:34:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170934.l8H9YLgZ019767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 Bug 275871 depends on bug 275851, which changed state. Bug 275851 Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:34:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170934.l8H9YJe3019710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 05:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I've generated the pyzzub bindings from libzzub as described in > http://doc.zeitherrschaft.org/zzub/html/x113.html Ah, now I understand the situation. So, pyzzub is in the libzzub tarball. In this case, pyzzub must be created as a subpackage of libzzub. As far as I googled pyzzub, About versioning: Other distribution marks the version of pyzzub as the same one of libzzub. So now I mark this bug a duplicate of libzzub. Please rewrite libzzub spec file and create pyzzub rpm as a subpackage of libzzub. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 275831 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 09:46:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709170946.l8H9kMqc021999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 05:46 EST ------- OK, package updated. I am sorry, I have forgotten to update release number. Same URLs contains new package/spec. I am unable to test it with mock now, because my mirror deleted all it's content due to a problem on master mirror. I will try them later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 10:04:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 06:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286391] Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171004.l8HA4c6X024712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tack - Terminfo action checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286391 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 12:03:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171203.l8HC3MH5008590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-17 08:03 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: filezilla New Branches: F-7 Since gnutls may going to be updated in F-7, that might be possible to have filezilla in F-7 also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 12:07:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171207.l8HC7wgd009514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-09-17 08:07 EST ------- fixed in automake17-1.7.9-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:03:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171303.l8HD3546019391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 225984 depends on bug 203574, which changed state. Bug 203574 Summary: remove liblftp-jobs.so and liblftp-tasks.so for internal libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203574 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171300.l8HD0i0j018265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 09:00 EST ------- For 0.27-6: * Requires: - Again recheck python related dependency. you can try the result ------------------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C grep -h 'import ' `rpm -ql straw | grep -v /usr/share/doc` | grep -v Binary | sed -e 's|^[ \t][ \t]*||' | sort | uniq ------------------------------------------------------------- For me it seems - libxml2-python, pyorbit are not needed - "gtk2 > 2.4", libglade2 are redundant - pygtk2-devel must be removed + pygtk2-libglade is needed (PreferencesDialog.py requires) This will also install pygtk2 + gnome-python2-libegg is needed (Tray.py requires) + gnome-python2-gconf is needed (Config.py requires) I attach my check list for python related dependency of straw. Please check if it is correct. * Conflicts - Well, would you readd "Conflicts: python-adns" until bug 292821 is solved? * Please add the comment in the spec file like "Current python-adns makes double free problem (bug 292821)" * %pre - Please write %pre section after %install section - And again fix "[NAME]" to the real gconf file name. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:04:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171304.l8HD4OJS019574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 09:04 EST ------- (For review request tracking, changing status to NEXTRELEASE again) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256341] Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171304.l8HD4gpD018563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: micq - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256341 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:15:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225859] Merge Review: groff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171315.l8HDF5b5021599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: groff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225859 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-17 09:15 EST ------- Looks ok for me, fedora release ack granted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:33:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171333.l8HDXpXS024285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 09:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=197411) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=197411&action=view) python dependency check list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:31:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171331.l8HDVLdQ022962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-17 09:31 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/libzzub-0.2.3-6.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - added pyzzub as an internal extra package (including all issues mentioned in Bug 275851) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:35:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171335.l8HDZcxG023678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-17 09:35 EST ------- The changes have been made and the new srpm is available here: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/lohit-fonts/lohit-fonts-2.1.5-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171352.l8HDqkZo025997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 09:52 EST ------- For 0.6-1 * gloox support - Well, the new spec file contains the following lines in the description: ------------------------------------------------------- It now also supports the XMPP protocol as well as OTR encrypted messages. ------------------------------------------------------- However the build log says build.log: ------------------------------------------------------- checking checking for variadic macro support... yes checking whether to enable XMPP chat network (BETA)... no checking whether to enable MSN chat network (EXPERIMENTAL BROKEN INCOMPLETE)... no ------------------------------------------------------- configure.ac says that supporting XMPP needs gloox library, which does not seem to be available on fedora. configure.ac: ------------------------------------------------------- 368 else 369 PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XMPP, gloox, ac_use_xmpp=yes, ac_use_xmpp=no) 370 fi ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 13:57:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171357.l8HDvljg026812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-09-17 09:57 EST ------- autoconf is definitely required tor the self tests. You'll get >50 failures otherwise. I'd prefer not to start listing which files are under which license. When someone has concerns about the used licenses he/she would have to check every file anyhow. Can you point me to a wiki page backing up your request for that ? You're right about OFSFDL, I've added that to the license list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 14:00:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171400.l8HE0teb027468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-09-17 10:00 EST ------- I haven't forgotten about this, but I've got a showstopper problem before I am comfortable doing a build. I spoke with Kay about this last week, and he wanted an enhancement to udev-114 to let biosdevname suggest the new name without overriding the values in 70-persistent-net-names. I haven't made the enhancement to udev yet, so that's what's blocking me on this... Hopefully this week I can spend some time on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 14:21:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171421.l8HELqJD031749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-17 10:21 EST ------- > 1) Change Buildroot tag mentioned in Why? How have it requires the 'MUST' of the requirements? Plus this format is used in a number of other related so I would like to keep the all the same. > 2) Chane License tag Done. > 3) Check rpmlint output on all rpms. Done. > 4) drop prefix in configure command. Done. > 5) should not use makeinstall macro. Done. > Remove static archives or move them to new subpackage Done. > * Don't use PreReq Done. > * Requires(postun/pre) /sbin/ldconfig can be removed. Done. > * Add "-p" option to "install" commant to keep timestamps Done. > * Use macros. /etc should be %_sysconfdir, for example. Done. > * Support parallel make when possible, otherwise comment in the > spec file that this package cannot support parallel make. Not clear as to how this is achieved. rpm and spec file on my people page have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:08:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171508.l8HF8wLL006658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 11:08 EST ------- New version fixing the dynamic determination of gcc include path, which was broken somehow (I did test it) on the new version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava-0.9.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:21:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171521.l8HFLfgu007073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 11:21 EST ------- For -6: * pyzzub naming - Perhaps you want to use the name "pyzzub" for python binding subpackage, not "libzzub-pyzzub". In that case, you can do by passing -n option. i.e. ---------------------------------------------------- %package -n pyzzub Summary: Python Bindings For libzzub ........ %files -n pyzzub %defattr(-,root,root,-) ........ ---------------------------------------------------- *BuildRequires -6 does not build on rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=160863 - python-devel is missing from BuildRequires - and python-setuptools is not needed from BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171548.l8HFmFqp012809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |275871 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:48:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171548.l8HFmGwh012833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|275871 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:44:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171544.l8HFimc3012142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-17 11:44 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/libzzub.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/libzzub-0.2.3-7.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - re-added pyzzub python-devel build requirement - explicitly nailed the name of pyzzub The only new drawback is that pyzzub cannot be built as a noarch package from now on. Mamoru, is it possible for me to do the Koji builds for non-approved revisions yet or shall I leave that to you for now? However I really appreciate your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171548.l8HFmFw8012781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|275851 |275831 Bug 275871 depends on bug 275831, which changed state. Bug 275831 Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:57:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171557.l8HFvvqR014421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-17 11:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > * The 2 files (fancybox.sty and pcatcode.sty) under Artistic v1. Spot: Does > texlive really have to be blocked for this one? Considering these are both > already in the existing tetex packages, keeping texlive on hold won't actually > fix the problem. Plus, there are still other packages with Artistic v1 files in > them too. Yes, there are other packages with Artistic v1 licensing, but we're working on getting them relicensed. We're not letting new packages come in with the old Artistic license. Specifically, upstream has removed fancybox.sty and relicensed pcatcode.sty. I think that the texlive folks have handled all of the licensing concerns I found in the audit, it would be for the best if we could ask them to do a fresh tarball release, then rebase on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 15:55:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171555.l8HFtIEZ012691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-09-17 11:55 EST ------- Bad attempt (doesn't work well) of fixing gettext stuff (plus a patch against screwed-by-Picassa IPTC metadata using libiptcdata) is available at SRPM: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-0.2.182-3.fc7.src.rpm RPM: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout-0.2.182-3.fc7.noarch.rpm Spec: http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/rpms/jbrout.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:04:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171604.l8HG4Fj5015202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 12:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > The only new drawback is that pyzzub cannot be built as a noarch package from > now on. This is not unusual. For example, there are lots of packages named "*-doc(s)", which contain only documents but which are marked as "arch-dependent". > Mamoru, is it possible for me to do the Koji builds for non-approved revisions > yet or shall I leave that to you for now? Actually now it is _possible_, i.e. you can try to rebuild arbitrary srpms on koji like: $ koji build --scratch Currently target can be: "dist-fc7-updates-candidate" or "dist-f8". If rebuild succeeds, the results are put under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_./ -7 is okay. * Commit to CVS, rebuild on devel and F-7, and then you can close this bug again. * For F-7, please request to push to the real repository by using bodhi system * As currently libzzub does not support ppc64, please - open a new report (with component libzzub) which tells that libzzub does not support ppc64 - and make the bug block bug 238953. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:21:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171621.l8HGLeRa017789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-17 12:21 EST ------- But this is not really a new package, it is a replacement for tetex, with much of the same files, and in fact these 2 files were already in tetex. But if this has been solved upstream, the point is moot anyway, so let's not waste time arguing this. We do need a fresh tarball with the licensing issues fixed though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:22:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171622.l8HGMxPv016495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 12:22 EST ------- OK, updated description, before gloox will be a part of Fedora. http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/climm-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm I have my first experimental gloox package in my repository, request review will follow after some testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171638.l8HGceRB020157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 12:38 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (climm) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- When rebuild of climm is done for devel repo, please make micq package orphaned on devel repo. The related document is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages (this is the first time I read the above URL since the retirement procedure changed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:41:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171641.l8HGf1Ks019499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-17 12:41 EST ------- readded Conflicts:python-adns with refer to bug#292821 fixed {NAME] in %pre tried to fix redundant dependencies. Spec file available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw.spec] SRPM is available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw-0.27-7.fc7.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171648.l8HGmv3J021786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-17 12:48 EST ------- > 1. Some of the source files appear to be GPLv2+ GPLv2+ added to license. > In addition there is a copy of the Bitsteam Vera Fonts with their own license > inside the "winter.etheme" tar.gz thats in the e16 tar.gz. Can that be made > somehow to use the already existing Vera package? Removed ttfonts dir, created a symlink and added bitstream-vera to req, seems to work. > I will have spot check it over... Ok, thanks. > 2. Some possible missing BuildRequires: Tried to add some X related devel packages, better now? > 3. rpmlint says: > > e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/slideouts/slideouts.cfg > e16.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/winter/buttons/buttons.cfg > > Not sure if those can be removed, or if they are needed by that theme... Tried that, not a crash, but a freeze, better leave these. > e16.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libe16_hack.so libe16_hack.so > > Does that so file need to be in /usr/lib? Don't know, however e16 seems to be happy without this lib, maybe needed by the epplets? > e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/ChangeLog > e16.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/e16-0.16.8.9/AUTHORS > > Might run 'iconv' on those? Fixed. SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-0.16.8.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:47:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269421] Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171647.l8HGlDFf020384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-egit - Eclipse Git plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269421 bkonrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 16:57:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171657.l8HGvqCb023178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-17 12:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: climm Short Description: Text/line based ICQ client with many features Owners: ondrejj Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:04:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171704.l8HH4Clk022480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-17 13:04 EST ------- > Tried to add some X related devel packages, better now? Added some more, did not bump release: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-0.16.8.9-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:14:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171714.l8HHEDXr025171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-17 13:14 EST ------- A license with virtually the same text is pending review at the FSF right now, so I'm slapping FE-Legal on this one until it is resolved... sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171724.l8HHO7gd025205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-17 13:24 EST ------- I take the review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:24:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171724.l8HHOfZ7026583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries (used in openexr) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254056] Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171727.l8HHRBMW027152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16 - The Enlightenment window manager, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254056 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-17 13:27 EST ------- > A license with virtually the same text is pending review at the FSF right now, > so I'm slapping FE-Legal on this one until it is resolved... sorry. Oki, thanks for the help so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:28:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171728.l8HHS3C3027194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ilmbase - |Review Request: ilmbase - |Abraction/convenience |Abraction/convenience |libraries (used in openexr) |libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 17:52:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269441] Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171752.l8HHqJRF031362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvgrab - A program to copy Digital Video data from a DV camcorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269441 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-09-17 13:52 EST ------- Indeed. I'll file an update request then. Somehow I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171937.l8HJb44k015268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 ------- Additional Comments From tjb at unh.edu 2007-09-17 15:37 EST ------- New version builds fine for me now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171947.l8HJl8Xf016815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 Bug 275871 depends on bug 275831, which changed state. Bug 275831 Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:47:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275851] Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171947.l8HJl7GR016785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyzzub - Python Bindings For libzzub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275851 Bug 275851 depends on bug 275831, which changed state. Bug 275831 Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajackson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/avivo/xorg-x11-drv-avivo.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/avivo/xorg-x11-drv-avivo-0.0.1-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: avivo is an Xorg driver for ATI R500 and R600 cards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:47:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171947.l8HJl6YP016761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Keywords|Reopened | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-17 15:47 EST ------- > Commit to CVS, rebuild on devel and F-7, and then you can close this bug again. Done > For F-7, please request to push to the real repository by using bodhi system Shall I push to testing or stable? Pushed to testing for now. However how can people test without aldrin for now..? > As currently libzzub does not support ppc64, please > - open a new report (with component libzzub) which tells that > libzzub does not support ppc64 > - and make the bug block FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64. Done: Bug 293751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285331] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171957.l8HJvPgk026656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285331 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 15:57 EST ------- I've add a comment to bug 232358 to try and coordinate this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 19:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232358] Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709171956.l8HJuwxP026624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232358 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 15:56 EST ------- Same for me (only nullbytes), notice that there has been another submission, see bug 285331, are you still interested in maintaining this? Maybe the two of you can co-maintain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172001.l8HK1Nwb027651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-09-17 16:01 EST ------- Typo in the "amb-plugins" Provides: $ rpm -qp --provides /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/ladspa-amb-plugins-0.3.0-1.fc8.i386.rpm amb-plugins = 0.3.0=1.fc8 ambisonic1.so ambisonic2.so ladspa-amb-plugins = 0.3.0-1.fc8 Suggesting you replace 'I use' with 'to use' in the %description With the Provides in the Obsoletes/Provides pair you practically occupy the "amb-plugins" namespace. Is this really necessary to keep both package names when this is a new-entry in Fedora? Else it's approved packaging- and licencing-wise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:10:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172010.l8HKA1TD030308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 16:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Typo in the "amb-plugins" Provides: > This will be fixed in the imported version > Suggesting you replace 'I use' with 'to use' in the %description Idem > > With the Provides in the Obsoletes/Provides pair you practically > occupy the "amb-plugins" namespace. Is this really necessary > to keep both package names when this is a new-entry in Fedora? > The obsoletes is necessary because it used to be called amb-plugins in somewhat older but not very old CCRMA releases, the provides is there as upstream's name is amb-plugins and thus IMHO yum install amb-plugins should work too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:11:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283721] Review Request: bolzplatz2006 - Slam Soccer 2006 is a funny football game in 3D-comic-style In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172011.l8HKBHlA022444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bolzplatz2006 - Slam Soccer 2006 is a funny football game in 3D-comic-style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283721 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 16:11 EST ------- Unfortunately upstream couldn't get all data-files contributers to agree to a license change, so here is a new version using autodownloader instead :( Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/bolzplatz2006.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/bolzplatz2006-1.0.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283711] Review Request: bolzplatz2006-data - Datafiles for bolzplatz2006 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172012.l8HKCOM8022599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bolzplatz2006-data - Datafiles for bolzplatz2006 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283711 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 16:12 EST ------- Unfortunately upstream couldn't get all data-files contributers to agree to a license change, so I've made a new bolzplatz2006 (engine) package which uses autodownloader for the data files, closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:13:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172013.l8HKDaZT022731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-17 16:13 EST ------- The first Koji scratch build of sirius failed for x86_64 architechture. You can see the build.log (of x86_64) over here: [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=160171&name=build.log] The build.log showed up an error that "error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool". So i added perl-XML-parser as build require. After that, Koji build was successful. The task is: [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=161229] So did following things: * added perl-XML-parser as build require * bumped up release number to 7 The updated links of the spec and srpm are, Spec file URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sirius.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sirius-0.8.0-7.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:28:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172028.l8HKSXAq000913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:27:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172027.l8HKRlmd000841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 16:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-amb-plugins Short Description: Ambisonics LADSPA plugins Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:33:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172033.l8HKXV1V001790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 tkuratom at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From tkuratom at redhat.com 2007-09-17 16:33 EST ------- Testing BZ problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:30:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172030.l8HKUHX2025807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-17 16:30 EST ------- Also rpmlint gives no errors/warnings: $ rpmlint .../sirius-0.8.0-7.fc7.src.rpm $ rpmlint .../sirius-0.8.0-7.fc7.i386.rpm $ rpmlint .../sirius-debuginfo.0.8.0-7.fc7.i386.rpm all these simply gave no errors/warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:35:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172035.l8HKZ6tS026715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172042.l8HKgDNF003793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:42:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172042.l8HKgFf0003826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-17 16:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:44:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172044.l8HKi7pV028158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-17 16:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:48:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172048.l8HKmZlL004776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-17 16:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:45:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] New: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: makghosh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gurlchecker.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gurlchecker-0.10.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: gURLChecker is a Gnome tool that can check links on a single web page or on a whole web site in order to determine validity of each page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172049.l8HKn4ie004869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: gurlchecker |Review Request: gurlchecker |- A Gnome link validity |- A Gnome link validity |checker |checker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:53:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172053.l8HKrB1a029648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-17 16:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > autoconf is definitely required tor the self tests. You'll get >50 failures > otherwise. Right. > I'd prefer not to start listing which files are under which license. When > someone has concerns about the used licenses he/she would have to check every > file anyhow. Indeed. My issue is that I don't see any file under the MIT license. All that I see are in GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 20:55:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172055.l8HKt050005593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-17 16:54 EST ------- Hi Marc, As discussed by private mail, I'll review your 3 submissions and when they are all approved I'll sponsor you. I've done a full review of the latest version and I've found a few issues besides the potential name clash for ts: Must FIX: --------- * change license from "GPL" to "GPLv2" (sponge is GPL version 2 only) * upstream has 0.24 out, update please * The weird CPAN comment doesn't make any sense, either remove it or make it make sense * Please use the BuildRoot from the Packaging Guidelines * Don't install README and COPYING under %{_datadir}/%{name} instead add them to %files like this: "%doc README COPYING" rpm wil then automatically create a dir under /usr/share/doc for them and put them there. * Don't use %doc for man files. As for the ts namespace clash, I see 2 options: 1) Ship with upstreams ts name, so that we are consistent with upstream, and rename to ts-stdin if an actual file conflict arises 2) Rename to ts-stdin now I tend to prefer 1, but if we do 2 now, we avoid pain for end users if we have to rename later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 21:05:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294001] New: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin at gamesplace.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gamesplace.info/mumble.spec SRPM URL: http://gamesplace.info/mumble-1.0.0-37.2.src.rpm Description: Mumble is a low-latency, high quality voice chat software primarily intended for use while gaming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 21:12:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172112.l8HLCcl5008527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-17 17:12 EST ------- Now, rpmlint returned with no errors/warnings: $ rpmlint .../gurlchecker-0.10.1-1.fc7.src.rpm $ rpmlint .../gurlchecker-0.10.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm $ rpmlint .../gurlchecker-debuginfo-0.10.1-1.fc7.i386.rpm All these gave no errors/warnings at all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 21:12:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172112.l8HLC20M008495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproje| |ct.org) | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-17 17:12 EST ------- I think that the Obsoletes should be with Obsoletes: automake = 1.7.9 I have checked that when rerunning automake-1.7, the Makefile.in files are not the same, in the new ones there are other variables. But those variables look suspiciously like variables introduced in recent automake (1.9 or 1.10). So it is certainly right as is. The check part should be in a %check section. Currently it is in comment, but it would certainly be better to put a #%check at the beginning of the comments, or even %check to avoid forgetting. I still don't see any file under the MIT license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 21:15:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172115.l8HLFqPm000809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-17 17:15 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 21:15:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172115.l8HLFZ8D000719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-17 17:15 EST ------- Approved. Go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 17 21:33:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709172133.l8HLXsZ6011522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-17 17:33 EST ------- The Koji scratch build of gurlchecker-0.10.1 for dist-f8 was successsful. I used the following command for the koji build: $ koji build --scratch dist-f8 .../gurlchecker-0.10.1-1.fc7.src.rpm The task ID of the build is: [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=160244] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 01:12:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180112.l8I1CV6a030737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-17 21:12 EST ------- Hi Hans, Thanks again for that. New SRPM: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/moreutils-0.24-1.src.rpm Regarding the namespace clash, I have gone with option 1 at present as this will not require existing scripts to be re-written. If it does need to be renamed later so be it. Unless you have any strong feelings to the contrary I suggest we go with option 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 02:17:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180217.l8I2HnkH014879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-17 22:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > For F-7, please request to push to the real repository by using bodhi system > Shall I push to testing or stable? I usually request to push to stable (i.e. skip testing). > Pushed to testing for now. However how can > people test without aldrin for now..? Perhaps no one can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 03:18:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180318.l8I3I5pF024996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-17 23:18 EST ------- slingshot-0.8.1p-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 03:17:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180317.l8I3HPsp016299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-17 23:17 EST ------- libzzub-0.2.3-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 03:18:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286631] Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180318.l8I3I6cv016409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slingshot - A Newtonian strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286631 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.8.1p-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 04:15:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:15:35 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230161=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt61pci-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2561/RT2661_A/B/G_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180415.l8I4FZnm025365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61pci-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-18 00:15 EST ------- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - OK - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK - Package needs ExcludeArch - OK - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK, firmware - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A - .la files are removed. - N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - OK - final provides and requires are sane: - OK (none) SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK - Should build on all supported archs - noarch, so.. sure. - Should function as described. - no hardware, can't test - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - N/A - Should have dist tag - not needed. Hopefully won't need to rebuild this. - Should package latest version - OK Works for me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 04:21:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180421.l8I4LPLi025949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 04:23:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180423.l8I4NbJT026024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-18 00:23 EST ------- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - *** Consider using some sort of versioning on the snapshot. - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - **** >From a quick examination, GPLv2 is the correct value for the license tag. Although avivotool is lacking in licensing in the code. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - *** Can't check due to snapshot. - Package needs ExcludeArch - OK - BuildRequires correct - *** BuildRequires: libpciaccess-devel and %configure --disable-pciaccess seem contradictory. Other than that, looks OK (it builds.) - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A - .la files are removed. - OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested: i386 (mock), x86_64 (local)) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. *** xorg-x11-drv-avivo.i386: W: invalid-license GPL - covered above - final provides and requires are sane: $ rpm -qpR xorg-x11-drv-avivo-0.0.1-3.fc8.i386.rpm libc.so.6 ... libpciaccess.so.0 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 ... implies that %configure --disable-pciaccess doesn't actually work. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK (tested: i386) - Should build on all supported archs - tested i386, x86_64 - Should function as described. - can't test, no hardware - Should have sane scriptlets. - OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - N/A - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - *** Can't tell from snapshot. So, absolutely needs fixed: - license tag Really useful to have fixed: - versioning of tarball, package Might want to fix: - libpciaccess confusion - add a .xinf file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 04:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283571] Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180446.l8I4kS5I028662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: homebank - Free easy personal accounting for all https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283571 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 05:21:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180521.l8I5LpgN008504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-18 01:21 EST ------- I think the package should be rename to be closer to the upstream name; maybe thaifonts-scalable would be good? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 05:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180542.l8I5gDGq010952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-09-18 01:42 EST ------- The solution in the last package is nonsense -- *.{po,mo} files should be really scattered in different directories, because that's the way the program and its plugins are written (using explicit locale dirs). There's nothing illegal in that, but we have to make %find_lang to work with this. Will ask on #fedora-devel and fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 05:46:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230316] Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180546.l8I5kA6b003426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jbrout - Photo manager, written in python/pygtk under the GPL licence https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230316 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2007-09-18 01:46 EST ------- OK, I have finally understood your comment 14 point 5, but the question is whether we should do this at all? Do we have to have one unified .mo file in %{_datadir} or is the current scattered solution good enough? (something about "Don't fix it when it works.") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 06:20:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180620.l8I6K7ht007632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-18 02:20 EST ------- I didn't look at this yet, however * Keep timestamp - When you use "cp" or "install", add "-p" option to keep timestamp * Parallel make - Support parallel make when possible, otherwise write a comment in the spec file which shows that the Makefile does not support parallel make * Permission - Please explain why you chose the permission "0444", not "0644". * Defattr - We now recommend "%defattr(-.root.root,-)" * rebuild - mock build fails at least on ppc http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=163593 Please post the full URL of your spec/srpm so that we can easily find which spec/srpm are the newest (and should be reviewed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 06:39:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294321] New: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294321 Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/open-vm-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/open-vm-tools-0-0.1.20070904svn56574.fc7.src.rpm Description: VMware released their VMware Tools product under the GPL and LGPL for *nix. open-vm-tools are utilities designed to run on a guest VM running inside some VMware hypervisor (workstation, player, ESX, etc...) Some general RFC: - That Release string is pretty dang long, I could probably drop the "svn##" suffix and just use the tarball date (until they actually release it under a real version number) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 06:45:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] New: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at theholbrooks.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/open-vm-tools-kmods.spec SRPM URL: http://theholbrooks.org/RPMS/open-vm-tools-kmods-0-0.1.20070904svn56574.2.6.22.5_76.fc7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the 4 kernel modules required by open-vm-tools: vmblock vmhgfs vmmemctl vmxnet Some general RFC: - First and foremost, should this package really be split up into 4 packages, one for each module, like "kmod-vmblock" and "kmod-vmhgfs" There shouldn't be a reason anybody would want a subset of the 4... - This package currently builds, installs, and works in F7 but not rawhide (upstream incompat with latest kernels... working on a patch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 06:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294321] Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180647.l8I6lh3r010785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294321 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |294341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 06:47:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180647.l8I6lhdQ010805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |294321 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 07:13:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180713.l8I7Dcs6014127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-09-18 03:13 EST ------- MInd that I did not test for this particular application, but usually vmware incompatibility with recent kernels (actually vmware-config.pl -> compilation of kernel modules ) is fixed by the any-any patch from http://platan.vc.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/vmware/. Wouldn't it help here too ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 07:22:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180722.l8I7M2GD023706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-09-18 03:22 EST ------- I asked the vmware guys that very question and they responded that their release to SoruceForge was essentially 'trunk' from their internal source control, which includes all the any-any updates. It appears f8 needs the _next_ any-any update :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 07:21:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180721.l8I7LxVv023684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 03:21 EST ------- According to current packaging guidelines * if upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as . usage of dekstop-file-install is correct but use "fedora" instead "Fedora" as vendor id Do we need to move following files to fbreader-devel? /usr/lib/libzltext.so.0.8.6d /usr/lib/libzlcore.so.0.8.6d review guidelines says - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 08:25:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180825.l8I8PQFe025369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2007-09-18 04:25 EST ------- Detailed license breakdown and questions submitted to spot, awaiting response. In any case the package could do with a PACKAGE-LICENSING file adding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 08:30:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225770] Merge Review: freetype In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180830.l8I8Ui4U026064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: freetype https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225770 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-18 04:30 EST ------- There's still some badness left: * The Source: tag doesn't contain the full URL. Please change this to: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/freetype/freetype-%{version}.tar.bz2 (likewise for Source1 and Source2) * The License tag should be "License: FTL or GPLv2+". * Please ship the license files as %doc, e.g.: %doc ChangeLog README docs/LICENSE.TXT docs/FTL.TXT docs/GPL.TXT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 09:05:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294321] Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180905.l8I95Chm006288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294321 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 05:05 EST ------- mock build gave me checking for XineramaQueryVersion in -lXinerama... no configure: error: libXinerama not found. Please configure without multimon (using --disable-multimon) or install the libXinerama devel package(s). error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9608 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 09:15:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709180915.l8I9FcEL007820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-18 05:15 EST ------- In the meantime there were three new upstream version. Here's the latest: Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.4-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 10:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181028.l8IASBYJ017939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 06:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > 1) Change Buildroot tag mentioned in > Why? How have it requires the 'MUST' of the > requirements? Plus this format is used in > a number of other related so I would like to > keep the all the same. > I will consider this as a BLOCKER as packaging guidelines clearly said MUST use %{name}, %{version} and %{release} in buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 10:33:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181033.l8IAXcYV011205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-18 06:33 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SPECS/aldrin.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://prelive.iconmobile.com/dev31/fedora-icm-repo/Fedora/7/SRPMS/aldrin-0.11-2.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - updated requires to new libzzub w/ integrated pyzzub - removed redundant requires - fixed rpm path macros - fixed CREDITS encoding Build from scratch was successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=163904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 10:35:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181035.l8IAZftG018985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 06:35 EST ------- kmod packages? are they allowed still? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 11:03:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181103.l8IB37os022792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-18 07:03 EST ------- > I will consider this as a BLOCKER as packaging guidelines clearly said > MUST use %{name}, %{version} and %{release} in buildroot. Ok... Here is the diff. --- /tmp/libgssglue.spec.orig 2007-09-17 10:21:19.000000000 -0400 +++ libgssglue.spec 2007-09-18 06:53:43.000000000 -0400 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ URL: http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/ License: GPL+ Source0:http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/libgssglue/libgssglue-0.1.tar.gz Group: System Environment/Libraries -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root BuildRequires: pkgconfig The srpm and spec file on my people have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 11:17:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181117.l8IBH1CO017691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-18 07:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #47) > > * The 2 files (fancybox.sty and pcatcode.sty) under Artistic v1. Spot: Does > > texlive really have to be blocked for this one? Considering these are both > > already in the existing tetex packages, keeping texlive on hold won't > > actually fix the problem. Plus, there are still other packages with > > Artistic v1 files in them too. > > Yes, there are other packages with Artistic v1 licensing, but we're working on > getting them relicensed. We're not letting new packages come in with the old > Artistic license. fair enough, imo. > Specifically, upstream has removed fancybox.sty really? i've just sorted out the confusion created by an earlier re-licensing of fancybox as lppl, and the situation (on ctan) is now completely clear -- only one copy, lppl, catalogued as lppl. > and relicensed pcatcode.sty. I definitely not: that's an ams package. i've approached the ams about it, and they say there's an upcoming release that will have a revised (free) licence statement. the release is scheduled for 2007-10-01; if it arrives (fingers firmly crossed) it will be on ctan by 2007-10-02 (uk time), and probably in the tex-live repository later that day (california time ;-). pcatcode is actually part of the amsrefs bundle, and pro tem i've marked that bundle as artistic v1 licensed, in the catalogue. i hadn't noticed that single file in the bundle that wasn't licensed lppl (i suspect the ams hadn't either). > think that the texlive folks have handled all of the licensing > concerns I found in the audit, good -- even though i think you're slightly confused about it all... > it would be for the best if we could ask them to do a fresh > tarball release, then rebase on that. i had assumed that redhat was working from the repository. tex-live's not supplied me (as ctan mirror of tug.org) with a texmf-tarball for years -- i currently get a disc image and tarballs of sources. if all else fails, i could build a tarball from my copy of the repository, and upload it to redhat, but it seems an awful kerfuffle. preparing a new disc image (including building all the sources for all supported platforms) takes more than a month, i think. i wouldn't recommend waiting for that (next scheduled delivery, ~= 2008-01-15). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 11:36:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181136.l8IBal3C027949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-18 07:36 EST ------- > i've just sorted out the confusion created by an earlier re-licensing > of fancybox as lppl, and the situation (on ctan) is now completely > clear -- only one copy, lppl, catalogued as lppl. As far as I can tell, this means it should be safe to get this file back in (in its LPPL version) if it really has been removed. spot? > i've approached the ams about it, and they say there's an upcoming > release that will have a revised (free) licence statement. the > release is scheduled for 2007-10-01; if it arrives (fingers firmly > crossed) it will be on ctan by 2007-10-02 (uk time), and probably in > the tex-live repository later that day (california time ;-). Sounds good (except for the wait). Unfortunately, I don't know who the upstream contact spot (Tom Callaway) spoke to was, I only know what spot posted to this bug and to the mailing lists. As for the tarballs, the current specfile has this to say: # Source0 comes as a result from scripts that look for files in teTeX and assigns appropriate # TeXLive styles to it so that no style present in teTeX will be missing in TeXLive. # it contains expanded packages from ftp://tug.org/texlive/Contents/inst/archive/ # Scripts that are used for that are available at http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/scripts/ Source0: texlive.texmf-%{version}.tar.bz2 # Source1 is http://www.tug.org/texlive/Contents/inst/archive/texmf-var.zip Source1: texlive.texmf-var-%{version}.zip so the canonical sources for the current tarball are the packages in archive/. Since the Fedora tarball is recomposed anyway, I guess this means Jindrich Novy can/should also take care of the updating, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 12:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181203.l8IC32IS031177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 08:03 EST ------- Few more suggestion I got 1) change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-.root.root,-) Though nothing specific written in guidelines but SPEC given under section http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee said like that. 2) Usage of parallel make http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 3) rpmlint on binary rpm gave me libgssglue.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libgssglue.so.1.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %post scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. libgssglue.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libgssglue.so.1.0.0 This package contains a library and provides no %postun scriptlet containing a call to ldconfig. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?action=show&redirect=ScriptletSnippets#head-d0dbcb7eec27622a21df280009c5b089b02f5bef 4) Mix of 3 licenses summarizes to GPL+ which I take it as correct usage for License tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 12:11:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181211.l8ICBsu2032523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 08:11 EST ------- last thing I forgot to mention-> remove BuildRequires: pkgconfig mock build went successful without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 12:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181219.l8ICJ10U025181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-18 08:19 EST ------- Kernel Modules in Fedora have been banned from Fedora, see: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/FESCo-2007-09-13.html Search for: | Proposal: No new kmods, and existing ones dropped by F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 12:46:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181246.l8ICkSRY004765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-18 08:46 EST ------- Any progress here? Is -5 OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 12:54:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] New: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel.at QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://buildsys.zero42.at/mnt/koji/packages/aboot/1.0_pre20040408/1.fc8/src/aboot.spec SRPM URL: http://buildsys.zero42.at/mnt/koji/packages/aboot/1.0_pre20040408/1.fc8/src/aboot-1.0_pre20040408-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The aboot program is the preferred way of booting Linux when using SRM firmware (the firmware normally used to boot an DEC UNIX). Aboot supports the creation of bootable block devices and contains a program which can load Linux kernels from a filesystem which is bootable by SRM. Aboot also supports direct booting from various filesystems (ext2, ISO9660, UFS), booting of executable object files (ELF and ECOFF), booting of compressed kernels, network booting (using bootp), partition tables in DEC UNIX format, and interactive booting and default configurations for SRM consoles that cannot pass long option strings. If you are installing Fedora or Red Hat Linux on an Alpha, you'll need to install the aboot package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 13:02:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181302.l8ID2x6E031468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 oliver at linux-kernel.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |alpha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 13:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181315.l8IDFXOj001213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-09-18 09:15 EST ------- /usr/share/automake-1.7/install-sh is MIT afaik. I've fixed the Obsoletes version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 13:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181314.l8IDEMfx000638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 13:49:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292331] Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181349.l8IDnJSs005770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-amb-plugins - Ambisonics LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292331 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-18 09:49 EST ------- Michael, thanks for the review! Imported and build, update push requested for F-7, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:06:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181406.l8IE6JNU017095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-09-18 10:06 EST ------- Stepan Kasal suggested using checking for versions < 1.8 to catch all upgrades from automake-1.7.*. It would also match if automake-1.6.* is still installed, but that should be replaced by automake16 anyhow. Something like Conflicts: automake < 1.8 Obsoletes: automake < 1.8 would disallow concurrent installation of automake17 with automake-1.6.* as well as automake-1.7.* but allows installation of automake16 and automake17. I think I'll change it accoring to his suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181408.l8IE8jBi017281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-18 10:08 EST ------- Ping^2. Whom do I need to bribe to review this package? I'd really like to be able to update perl-Test-Inline and to have it in FC-8, but without this package having been add, this won't be possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:11:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294741] New: Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294741 Summary: Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tsmetana at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,silfreed at silfreed.n et Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nut New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:25:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294741] Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181425.l8IEPqx2020294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294741 tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181424.l8IEO93c019766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-18 10:24 EST ------- - License tag should be "GPL+ or Artistic". - You don't need to state BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.005, it will get pulled in by BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) - Missing BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) (and/or perl(Test::Builder), if you'd prefer) Make those changes, and I'll finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181425.l8IEPhvB020202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-18 10:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #42) > I propose the following additions to the texmf substitutions: > %{__sed} -i 's?^TEXMF =.*?TEXMF = > {$TEXMFCONFIG,$TEXMFVAR,$TEXMFHOME,$TEXMFSYSCONFIG,!!$TEXMFSYSVAR,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFMAIN,!!$TEXMFDIST}?' > %{__sed} -i 's?^TEXMFLOCAL =.*?TEXMFLOCAL = %{_texmf_local}?' Could you be more verbose on these substitutions? > There is a -p missing for the first install. There were two missing '-p's actually, added. > in the tkdefaults patch, the defaults should be like in texlive > and the appropriate Requires set. I don't think so, the defaults there should match Fedora, so that it has to be tuned appropriatelly. > Instead of doing a link for the cmap ghostscript resources > I think that the texmf.cnf should be changed. Please provide a patch for this. > Also I think that > # move the configuration files and symlink them > is wrong. Better leave as is. I don't think so. Storing config files to /etc is perfectly fine IMO. > mktex.cnf should certainly be under the sole user > control, and in /etc/texmf/web2c Moved. > The common package may also be called texlive-common > and it should certainly be in Requires for more packages, for > example texlive, texlive-fonts, texlive-dvips, xdvi, mendexk, > dvipdfmx. I decided to remove the common package as it's useless and moved bits from there to the main package. > The install-info should not have .gz and have || :. Indeed, added. > The scriptlet commands should be in Requires(...). I hope > that rpm can figure out that the binary package has in fact to > be installed before the texmf package to be able to run the > scriptlet. > > Also it seems to me that at least updmap should be run as a > texmf package scriptlet, and not as the main package scriptlet, > since all that updmap needs is in the texmf packages, including > the config file. Seems reasonable, please provide patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:33:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181433.l8IEXDHA012772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-18 10:33 EST ------- License is GPLv2 for the driver and zlib for avivotool, since it's a derived work of radeontool. The pciaccess thing is merely a configure.ac bug, it's required at configure time even if you build without support for it. Not going to bother with an xinf file for a little while, it's not DTRTing on any of my hardware yet. Fixed license and tarball versioning: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/avivo/xorg-x11-drv-avivo-0.0.1-4.fc8.src.rpm http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/avivo/xorg-x11-drv-avivo.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181435.l8IEZ5ZV013270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-18 10:35 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. > * Keep timestamp fixed. > * Parallel make fixed (it doesn't work). > * Permission Following upstream. I changed the executables from 555 to 755; I have no really strong feelings about changing or leaving the rest, but I have a slight preference for staying the way they have it since it seems like unnecessary clutter to change it in the spec file. I can ask upstream about it and see if they have any objection to changing the defaults in the make file. > * Defattr fixed. > * rebuild > - mock build fails at least on ppc Will look into. There's updated packages at: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/calc.spec http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/calc-2.12.2.1-2.fc8.mattdm.gpl.src.rpm but I still have to look at the ppc build issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:50:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181450.l8IEoNhL015571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-18 10:50 EST ------- The required version of kde-filesystem is now in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 14:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181454.l8IEsx5G024727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-09-18 10:54 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181506.l8IF6XqG026846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2007-09-18 11:06 EST ------- * RPM %optflags are ignored completely. -g is missing, too. Instead, -O3 -funroll-loops ... are used which don't guarantee a significant performance gain. * According to the Makefile some other files are built with -O0 as -O1 would break some of the code. (interesting that the authors haven't added a test suite for that) * Hint: Deleting files from the extracted tarball in the %install section breaks --short-circuit rpmbuild. Preferably, this is avoided when it takes only minimal effort to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:11:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181511.l8IFB8gV027884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-18 11:11 EST ------- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181519.l8IFJN0b019849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2007-09-18 11:19 EST ------- Spot beat me to it - but I'll point out that rpmlint shows that Changes and lib/Test/Script.pm are incorrectly marked as executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:23:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181523.l8IFNoEA020630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-18 11:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #50) > Unfortunately, I don't know who the upstream contact spot (Tom Callaway) spoke > to was, I only know what spot posted to this bug and to the mailing lists. I think the whole conversation can be found in this thread: http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/tex-live/2007-August/014596.html and the upstream person is Karl Berry. > As for the tarballs, the current specfile has this to say: > # Source0 comes as a result from scripts that look for files in teTeX and > assigns appropriate > # TeXLive styles to it so that no style present in teTeX will be missing in > TeXLive. > # it contains expanded packages from > ftp://tug.org/texlive/Contents/inst/archive/ > # Scripts that are used for that are available at > http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/scripts/ > Source0: texlive.texmf-%{version}.tar.bz2 > # Source1 is http://www.tug.org/texlive/Contents/inst/archive/texmf-var.zip > Source1: texlive.texmf-var-%{version}.zip > so the canonical sources for the current tarball are the packages in archive/. > Since the Fedora tarball is recomposed anyway, I guess this means Jindrich Novy > can/should also take care of the updating, right? Yes, I will happily update the tarball as soon the legal things are clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:35:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181535.l8IFZ5Ni022633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:46:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181546.l8IFkNLZ000603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-18 11:46 EST ------- Okay, builds fine on ppc64. I've tracked down the bug to what looks like some wrong assumptions about integer sizes in the makefile. I'll get that fixed. (Package review guidelines indicate that we can go ahead in the meantime; I'll file the separate bug for that as soon as possible.) So.... http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/calc.spec http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/calc-2.12.2.1-4.fc8.mattdm.gpl.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:57:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294741] Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181557.l8IFvsEs002456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294741 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-18 11:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 15:58:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181558.l8IFwDAM002529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:00:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181600.l8IG0O9f003173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-18 12:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compiz-fusion Short Description: Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Owners: drago01, krh Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181602.l8IG23N4027024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-18 12:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compiz-fusion-extras Short Description: Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Owners: drago01, krh Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:15:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181615.l8IGF7u0029649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 12:15 EST ------- desktop file does not have vendor tag so following guideline is valid here. *if upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as . Use gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:19:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181619.l8IGJxA5005969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-18 12:19 EST ------- For 0.11-2: * SourceURL - Please change source URL accroding to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Macros - Use macros. /usr should be %_prefix . * Usage unification - Choose if you will use macros for commands as much as possible, or you won't use macros for commands. For example, you use %__mv for mv, while you don't use %__rm . - Also, choose %buildroot or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * ldconfig - Why must this package call ldconfig? * Docdir -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ ls -lad /usr/share/doc/aldrin* drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2007-09-18 22:04 /usr/share/doc/aldrin drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2007-09-18 22:04 /usr/share/doc/aldrin-0.11 -------------------------------------------------------- - "scons install" installs some files under /usr/share/doc/aldrin, while "%doc ChangeLog CREDITS INSTALL LICENCE" will install them to /usr/share/doc/aldrin-0.11. Please unify the documents' directory. * Python module dependency ! This is always hard work, however please do !! - Please check python module dependency for this package. EXAMPLE: /usr/share/aldrin/patterns.py contains the line: --------------------------------------------------------- 29 import pango --------------------------------------------------------- This means that aldrin should have "Requires: pygtk2". i.e. You have to check all "import foo" or "from foo import bar" sentence and add to the Requires the packages which provides those modules. Note that some "import" sentences may be additional requirements and may not be needed. * scripts Please check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - This package installs icons under /usr/share/icons/hicolor and GTK icon cache must be updated. - The desktop file in this package has MimeType info and desktop database must be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:30:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] New: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora-0.2.90.17-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: Python modules that handle communication with Fedora Infrastructure services. This set of modules helps with building clients that talk to Fedora Infrastructure's TurboGears based services such as Bodhi, PackageDB, MirrorManager, and FAS2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:47:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181647.l8IGl90a001895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 12:47 EST ------- change source URL to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz you can change %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 16:53:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181653.l8IGrFQr002723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-09-18 12:53 EST ------- Hello Sebastian, Sorry for the delay. I've just review this package and everything is absolutely correct, good work. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 17:02:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181702.l8IH2AZM004144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-18 13:02 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback, updated files available at: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Script.spec http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Test-Script-1.02-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 17:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181726.l8IHQOrJ017919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2007-09-18 13:26 EST ------- Build. Thank you Lubomir and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 17:32:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181732.l8IHWXsN008992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-18 13:32 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: Nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL+ or Artistic) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (8ceb782be03c0e0ce6f3b7097a327361468628b0) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file As usual, good work with the package Ralf. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 17:51:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181751.l8IHpKkE012790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-18 13:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > desktop file does not have vendor tag so following guideline is valid here. > *if upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as . To not misunderstand you: I do not have to change something here and my spec is correct in this case? > Use gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 17:54:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181754.l8IHshnD013194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-18 13:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Hello Sebastian, > > Sorry for the delay. I've just review this package and everything is absolutely > correct, good work. > > APPROVED. Wow. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 17:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181758.l8IHwPI6013822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-18 13:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grsync Short Description: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync Owners: svahl Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:03:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181803.l8II3BjO014626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:02:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181802.l8II2vPK014597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-18 14:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-avivo Short Description: Xorg driver for ATI R500+ chipsets Owners: ajax Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:16:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181816.l8IIGHpT016721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-18 14:16 EST ------- For 2.12.2.1-4: * rpmlint - rpmlint complains about lots of undefined-non-weak-symbols. ----------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint calc-libs calc-libs.i386: W: no-documentation calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 _zeroval_ calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 conf calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 _oneval_ calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcustcalc.so.2.12.2.1 qalloc (and so many) calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcalc.so.2.12.2.1 cust calc-libs.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libcalc.so.2.12.2.1 rl_readline_name (and so many) ------------------------------------------------------ This will cause linkage failure against these libraries and cannot be accepted (if you want to provide -devel subpackage). * Documents - For this package, the "core" package is calc-libs. i.e. all other packages depend on calc-libs, and even one can try to install only calc-libs and try not to install calc. So there can be the case in which no documents like license texts are installed, which is not proper. In short, license texts and so on must be moved to -libs subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181841.l8IIf8k5030176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181841.l8IIfY1R030226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:41:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181841.l8IIfJoG020653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181841.l8IIfROM020697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 18:55:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181855.l8IItbmm022948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-18 14:55 EST ------- Huh, I had no idea rpmlint could do that. Thanks, I'll track that down and fix it. Should documents be just moved to libs, or duplicated there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181903.l8IJ3w3M024099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-18 15:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Stepan Kasal suggested using checking for versions < 1.8 to catch all upgrades > from automake-1.7.*. > It would also match if automake-1.6.* is still installed, but that should be > replaced by automake16 anyhow. > > Something like > Conflicts: automake < 1.8 > Obsoletes: automake < 1.8 The Conflict is not useful, since the Obsolete will cause the older automake to be removed. > would disallow concurrent installation of automake17 with automake-1.6.* as > well as automake-1.7.* but allows installation of automake16 and automake17. > I think I'll change it accoring to his suggestions. But then if you have automake-1.6.3 installed, you have 2 package that obsolete it, automake16 and automake17. I am not sure that it is right. Maybe Obsoletes: automake = 1.7.1, automake = 1.7.2, automake = 1.7.3 Obsoletes: automake = 1.7.4, automake = 1.7.5, automake = 1.7.6 Obsoletes: automake = 1.7.7, automake = 1.7.8, automake = 1.7.9 It is ugly, but may be more correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:07:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181907.l8IJ76iX002181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-18 15:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > /usr/share/automake-1.7/install-sh is MIT afaik. Very true. A comment would be nice, in my opinion. Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:09:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181909.l8IJ9uU2002520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-18 15:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * RPM %optflags are ignored completely. -g is missing, too. > Instead, -O3 -funroll-loops ... are used which don't guarantee > a significant performance gain. > Ah, my bad I assume that becaused the project used autotools that the optflags would just be there, fixed now. > * According to the Makefile some other files are built with > -O0 as -O1 would break some of the code. (interesting that the > authors haven't added a test suite for that) > Hmm, very interesting. This was probably caused by there use of some obscure -ffoo options, and this was determined long ago with a much older gcc. However as you said, there is no test case, so I've just left this as is to be on the safe side. > * Hint: Deleting files from the extracted tarball in the > %install section breaks --short-circuit rpmbuild. Preferably, > this is avoided when it takes only minimal effort to do so. > Fixed (and saved 100kb of installed space) Here is a new version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-blop-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-blop-plugins-0.2.8-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181917.l8IJHIDS003970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2007-09-18 15:17 EST ------- Note: This is NOT a formal review (as I am not a reviewer). [x] package meets naming guidelines [x] specfile is encoded in ascii or utf-8 [x] specfile matches base package name [!] specfile uses macros consistently - use %{_bindir} in %install - maybe use a macro for the value of GLOBALCONF, because this is used twice [x] specfile is written cleanly [!] specfile is written in AE contains non-english comments [x] changelog is present and has correct format [x] license matches actual license [x] license is open source-compatible [x] license text is included in package [x] source tag has correct url [x] source files match upstream md5sum: d2ef9fa28a87bf32b3fe0c47ab82fa97 [x] latest version is packaged [x] summary is concise [x] dist tag is present [x] buildroot is correct [x] buildroot is prepped [x] %clean is present [x] proper build requirements [x] proper requirements [!] uses %{?_smp_mflags} [!] uses %{optflags} possibly requires patching the Makefile [x] doesn't use %makeinstall [x] package builds at least on one architecture tested on: fc7 x86_64 [!] packages installs and runs at least on one architecture boxes fails on fc7 x86_64 with: boxes: Alleged system-wide config file '/usr/share/boxes' is a directory [!] rpmlint is quiet boxes.src:26: W: setup-not-quiet boxes.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 8) [x] final provides/requires look sane [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] code, not content [x] file permissions are appropriate [!] debuginfo package looks usable the debuginfo package is empty, because -g is missing in CFLAGS, see above [-] config files marked as %config(noreplace) [x] owns all directories it creates [-] static libraries in -devel subpackage [-] header files in -devel subpackage [-] development .so files in -devel subpackage [-] pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage, requires pkgconfig [x] no .la files [x] doesn't need a -docs subpackage [x] relevant docs are included [x] doc files are not needed at runtime [-] provides a .desktop file, build-requires desktop-file-utils [-] uses %find_lang, build-requires gettext Additional notes / suggestions: - consider packaging doc/boxes.el (to ${datadir}/%{name}) - use install -p to preserve timestamps - default permissions for directories are not set in %defattr - use wildcard: %{_mandir}/man1/boxes.1* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:26:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181926.l8IJQDC9006190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-18 15:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > New SRPM: > http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/moreutils-0.24-1.src.rpm > Almost perfect, please put the %doc in %files under %defattr. > Regarding the namespace clash, I have gone with option 1 at present as this will > not require existing scripts to be re-written. If it does need to be renamed > later so be it. Unless you have any strong feelings to the contrary I suggest > we go with option 1. > I'm fine with going for option 1. p.s. Why does this bug depend on 242311? I don't see anything provided by perl-Time-Duration in the Requires list (including automatic requires) of moreutils? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:27:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244593] Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181927.l8IJRpF0028432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-pgbouncer - Lightweight connection pooler for PostgreSQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244593 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2007-09-18 15:27 EST ------- Updated to 1.0.8: Spec URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/postgresql-pgbouncer.spec SRPM URL: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/pgbouncer/postgresql-pgbouncer-1.0.8-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:30:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181930.l8IJUMkS006914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-18 15:30 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/aldrin.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/aldrin-0.11-3.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - generic sf.net source url - adapted macros wherever feasible (both paths and commands) - unified buildroot style - removed redundant ldconfig update call - new patch to rectify aldrin's installation doc directory and file list - added missing python module requirement - added update calls for GTK icon cache and desktop database Build from scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=164795 rpmlint yields nothing. I've checked all modules revealed through grep'ing imports in /usr/share/aldrin/*.py, they're all part of either Python, libzzub/pyzzub, pygtk or aldrin itself. Hope I didn't miss anything nevertheless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 19:39:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709181939.l8IJdcfk030424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-18 15:39 EST ------- I've done a full review, here is the result: Must Fix: --------- * Change license field to: "GPLv2+ or Artistic 2.0" Should Fix: ----------- * Fedora's default %defattr is: "%defattr(-,root,root,-) * There is a new upstream 1.06 release, this is a should Fix, as the changes seem pretty much uninteresting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 20:19:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182019.l8IKJm6C014740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From qark at ospace.net 2007-09-18 16:19 EST ------- Problems mentioned in comment #7 should be fixed: * Tue Sep 18 2007 Qark 0.2.2-2 - Removed dependency on Python - Simplified %files section - Replaced duplicated file with link I don't agree with replacing file with link as it can break when upstream changes theme for GUI (which is very likely). Whole application runs unmodified on several operating systems and I really don't like doing any Fedora specific fixes, because of it complicates maintenance of the application. I wonder why spec file based on already reviewed spec file got so many comments. Should I propagate comments to package I've derived my spec file from? Anyway -- thanks for reviewing the package. Spec URL: http://ospace.net/files/0.2.2-2/outerspace.spec SRPM URL: http://ospace.net/files/0.2.2-2/outerspace-0.2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 20:26:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:26:59 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230161=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt61pci-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2561/RT2661_A/B/G_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182026.l8IKQxq2005579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61pci-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-18 16:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rt61pci-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptor Owners: kwizart Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 20:31:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276201] Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182031.l8IKV6Qq016560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt5 - A diff-capable 'du-browser' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276201 ------- Additional Comments From mszpak at wp.pl 2007-09-18 16:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > change source URL to > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Why not. I'll do it in the next version. > you can change %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) My version is safer IMHO. For example there were problems in (at least) FC6 where due to some coincidences, permissions for files in /usr/share/app/ allowed access for root only (600). I see no cons of my solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 21:11:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182111.l8ILBXON022038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-18 17:11 EST ------- Fixing the link issues is turning out to be little bit of a pain (patches to the code). Will have an update tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 21:31:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182131.l8ILVLmk014628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-18 17:31 EST ------- > 1) change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-.root.root,-) This '%defattr(-.root.root,-)' caused 'Bad syntax: %defattr(-.root.root)' so I changed it to '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' > 2) Usage of parallel make Done. > 3) rpmlint on binary rpm gave me libgssglue.i386: E: > library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libgssglue.so.1.0.0 Fixed. > remove BuildRequires: pkgconfig Done. Spec file and rpm have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:01:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182201.l8IM1aHS019201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-18 18:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #51) > (In reply to comment #42) > > I propose the following additions to the texmf substitutions: > > %{__sed} -i 's?^TEXMF =.*?TEXMF = > > > {$TEXMFCONFIG,$TEXMFVAR,$TEXMFHOME,$TEXMFSYSCONFIG,!!$TEXMFSYSVAR,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFMAIN,!!$TEXMFDIST}?' > > %{__sed} -i 's?^TEXMFLOCAL =.*?TEXMFLOCAL = %{_texmf_local}?' > > Could you be more verbose on these substitutions? The second one is rather logical. The default uses selfautoparent, which is completely inconsistent with the remaining of the packaging. For TEXMF, $TEXMFSYSCONFIG is better without !!, such that even if the user doesn't run mktexlsr his config files are taken into account. Otherwise I have put !!$TEXMFLOCAL before our directories such that the user additions are taken into account. > > in the tkdefaults patch, the defaults should be like in texlive > > and the appropriate Requires set. > > I don't think so, the defaults there should match Fedora, so that it has to be > tuned appropriatelly. I wanted to say like in the texlive Fedora package (xdg-utils, htmlviewer...) > > Instead of doing a link for the cmap ghostscript resources > > I think that the texmf.cnf should be changed. > > Please provide a patch for this. Ok. What about: if [ -d "%{_datadir}/ghostscript/`gs --version| cut -d . -f 1-2`/Resource/CMap" ] ; then cmap_dir="%{_datadir}/ghostscript/"`gs --version| cut -d . -f 1-2`"/Resource/CMap/" elif [ -d "%{_datadir}/ghostscript/Resource/CMap" ] ; then cmap_dir="%{_datadir}/ghostscript/Resource/CMap/" fi if [ z"$cmap_dir" != 'z' ]; then pushd texmf/web2c %{__sed} -i 's?^CMAPFONTS = .*?CMAPFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/cmap//;'"$cmap_dir"'?' texmf.cnf popd fi > > Also I think that > > # move the configuration files and symlink them > > is wrong. Better leave as is. > > I don't think so. Storing config files to /etc is perfectly fine IMO. Once again config files under the packager/upstream control should be in %{_datadir}/texmf..., those under the user control should be in /etc/texmf... In the case of texlive-texmf context.cnf fmtutil.cnf texmf.cnf updmap.cfg should be under the packager/upstream control, but the user should be able to put his own files in /etc/texmf/web2c to augment/override the package files. And mktex.cnf should be in /etc/texmf/web2c under the user control, with %config(noreplace). > I decided to remove the common package as it's useless and moved bits from there > to the main package. Ok. > > The scriptlet commands should be in Requires(...). I hope > > that rpm can figure out that the binary package has in fact to > > be installed before the texmf package to be able to run the > > scriptlet. > > > > Also it seems to me that at least updmap should be run as a > > texmf package scriptlet, and not as the main package scriptlet, > > since all that updmap needs is in the texmf packages, including > > the config file. > > Seems reasonable, please provide patch. I will do later, I am still learning about those utilities/scriptlets and still trying to understand what/when to run them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:27:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290021] Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182227.l8IMRTGm032534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grsync - A Gtk+ GUI for rsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290021 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-18 18:27 EST ------- Build for devel, f7 and fc6. So I'm closing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:31:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182231.l8IMVcFn000795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-18 18:31 EST ------- flpsed-0.5.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:31:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182231.l8IMVks6000844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-18 18:31 EST ------- libzzub-0.2.3-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182231.l8IMVXCn023113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-18 18:31 EST ------- mencal-2.3-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:31:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182231.l8IMVmxl023191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.2.3-7.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:31:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252125] Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182231.l8IMVdLp023146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flpsed - WYSIWYG pseudo PostScript editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252125 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.5.0-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 22:59:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182259.l8IMx3jh004251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-18 18:59 EST ------- whoops, moved to the right place now. the ts command requires them for added functionality, it seems that as they were being included via an eval statement rpm was missing them from the automatic requirements list. I have added both modules to this version as requirements. http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/moreutils-0.24-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 23:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182301.l8IN1tbG027096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-18 19:01 EST ------- All fixed. http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/perl-Time-Duration-1.06-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 18 23:04:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709182304.l8IN4AmT004938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-18 19:04 EST ------- http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/phpTodo-0.8.1-0.6.beta.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 01:43:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - General Graphics Interface toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190143.l8J1hCxn024429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - General Graphics Interface toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 21:43 EST ------- any progress here on review? Is the packaging complete now for official review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 01:45:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287431] Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190145.l8J1jk82024866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbarcode - A barcode and label printing application for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-18 21:45 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 02:19:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190219.l8J2Jb4w018581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-18 22:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Script Short Description: Cross-platform basic tests for scripts Owners: corsepiu Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 02:57:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] New: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/solarwolf/solarwolf.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/solarwolf/solarwolf-1.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The point of the game is to scramble through 60 levels collecting space boxes. Each level gets is harder than the previous. Obstacles like bullets, mines, and asteroids cover your every move. Beat the Skip timer and grab the powerups for your only chance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 03:22:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190322.l8J3MQJ4028061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-18 23:21 EST ------- Remove the OPTIMIZE from %build. This is a noarch package, so passing CFLAGS doesn't make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 03:28:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190328.l8J3SFve028784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-09-18 23:28 EST ------- Upstream chose an MIT license and also fixed the 64-bit compilation issues. The new URLs are: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jlint/jlint.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jlint/jlint-1.23-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 03:47:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190347.l8J3lprQ010261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-18 23:47 EST ------- Parag, I will leave this review to how you judge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 03:58:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190358.l8J3wYid001055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-18 23:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:06:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:06:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230161=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt61pci-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2561/RT2661_A/B/G_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190406.l8J46F7h013095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61pci-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-19 00:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:13:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190413.l8J4D4D7013734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 00:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Parag, I will leave this review to how you judge. Did I miss something in this review? or you want to officially review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:11:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190411.l8J4Bk40013691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 00:11 EST ------- Also, SHOULD: Change http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/libgssglue/libgssglue-0.1.tar.gz to http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Then, I tried to install built rpm on F7 machine and I got rpm -Uvh libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /etc/gssapi_mech.conf from install of libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package libgssapi-0.11-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:17:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262401] Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190417.l8J4H1ZM003334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-09-19 00:17 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. I changed the name and version number as suggested. For the javadocs, I just unconditionally build them (because not every arch will have IcedTea, so the check with %{fedora} is insufficient). The package description for the javadocs notes that on systems with sinjdoc, the package contains nothing useful. As for the Group tag, I don't understand the problem. On my machine, there are 64 packages in that group (e.g., axis, bcel, castor, jrefactory), and I certainly have not installed all of the Java packages available from Fedora. Why should the final '/Java' be dropped? The new files are here: Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations-0-20060626.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190420.l8J4KDm8014818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 00:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > desktop file does not have vendor tag so following guideline is valid here. > > *if upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as > . > > To not misunderstand you: I do not have to change something here and my spec is > correct in this case? I think this is confusion around some peoples that if upstream is not having desktop file in tarball and if we are giving it then only use fedora tag but current guidelines said opposite to this. So I only commented that I am considering current guidelines. > > > Use gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda > > Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec > SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.4-2.fc8.src.rpm thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:19:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190419.l8J4Ju9a003500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 00:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Parag, I will leave this review to how you judge. > Did I miss something in this review? or you want to officially review this? I just wanted to say that when you can think this review can be approved I will agree with your judgment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 04:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190438.l8J4cxNx006008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2007-09-19 00:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > (In reply to comment #10) > > > Parag, I will leave this review to how you judge. > > Did I miss something in this review? or you want to officially review this? > > I just wanted to say that when you can think this review can > be approved I will agree with your judgment. cool. thanks. Sorry I didn't get what you said in your last comment and thought I took over your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:48:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190648.l8J6mf5r000920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-19 02:48 EST ------- New package and spec. I've switched to the 1.3.12 branch which is the new stable upstream branch instead of 1.2.17. There are some new files and a patch from upstream against 1.3.12.1 to clear up the licensing issue now that O'Reilly has changed to MIT license for its code. SPEC url: http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/haproxy/haproxy.spec SRPM url: http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/haproxy/haproxy-1.3.12.1-1.fc7.src.rpm It probably needs a full review again since this is a whole new branch of code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:58:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190658.l8J6wNI4002141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 02:58 EST ------- is this built already? If yes then you can close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:58:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190658.l8J6wZYi002175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 02:58 EST ------- is this built already? If yes then you can close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190655.l8J6tiHl001952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 02:55 EST ------- mock build is successful. But, need some changes for %doc make following line %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS %doc %{_datadir}/doc/roxterm/* %{_bindir}/roxterm %{_bindir}/roxterm-config %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-roxterm.desktop %{_datadir}/roxterm/* %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/roxterm.svg to %doc %{_datadir}/doc/roxterm %{_bindir}/roxterm %{_bindir}/roxterm-config %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-roxterm.desktop %{_datadir}/roxterm %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/roxterm.svg but this looks like that we are getting following docdir /usr/share/doc/roxterm but not /usr/share/doc/roxterm-1.7.4 you can use --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} to ./configure Use consistent macro style. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:58:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190658.l8J6wlBp002229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 02:58 EST ------- For -3: * Again docdir - This time when I * launch aldrin * choose Help -> Help browser try to open //usr/share/doc/aldrin/html/index.html , which is not found. Perhaps the related part in main.py: ------------------------------------------------------- 851 def on_help_contents(self, event): 852 """ 853 Event handler triggered by the help menu option. 854 855 @param event: menu event. 856 @type event: wx.MenuEvent 857 """ 858 import webbrowser 859 webbrowser.open_new(filepath('../doc/aldrin/html/index.html')) 860 -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:58:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190658.l8J6w7CI024090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 02:58 EST ------- is this built already? If yes then you can close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 06:58:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226433] Merge Review: stardict In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190658.l8J6wtUa024183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: stardict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226433 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 07:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190706.l8J76XpN003650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 03:06 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 07:07:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190707.l8J77SmR025503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ianburrell at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 03:07 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 07:10:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190710.l8J7AsNK026107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 03:10 EST ------- mock build gave me + /usr/bin/python setup.py install --root /var/tmp/dblatex-0.2.7-1.fc8-root-mockbuild running install error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib/python2.5/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7874 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 07:16:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190716.l8J7GGXi026722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 03:16 EST ------- rpmlint on binary RPM gave me fmtools.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/fmcontrol This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. rpmlint on SRPM gave me fmtools.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 18, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. fmtools.src: W: strange-permission fmcontrol.tar.gz 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 07:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292851] Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190720.l8J7KEqx027372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: climm - Text/line based ICQ client with many features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292851 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-19 03:20 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 07:45:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190745.l8J7jHg1030535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 03:45 EST ------- Almost okay for this package. * Macros in %changelog - rpmlint shows the following complaint on -2.fc7.src.rpm --------------------------------------------------------------- outerspace.src:70: W: macro-in-%changelog files --------------------------------------------------------------- When writing macros in %changelog, please use %% to prevent macros from being expanded, for example: --------------------------------------------------------------- * Tue Sep 18 2007 Qark 0.2.2-2 - Removed dependency on Python - Simplified %%files section --------------------------------------------------------------- So, as sponsor process requires, please - pre-review other person's review request - or submit another review request as I wrote in comment 7. (In reply to comment #8) > I don't agree with replacing file with link as it can break when upstream > changes theme for GUI (which is very likely). - You can simply change when it occurs. > I really don't like doing any Fedora specific > fixes, - Actually many srpm in Fedora have many Fedora specific fixes and they are actually necessary :) > I wonder why spec file based on already reviewed spec > file got so many comments. - I just say that Nicholas's comment is just a preview. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 08:08:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190808.l8J88oiw001596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-19 04:08 EST ------- Changelog: - own directories - set %%{_docdir} to %%{name}-%%{version} (In reply to comment #5) > Use consistent macro style. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf done Spec URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.4-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 08:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275281] Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190814.l8J8EgHp012870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmage - A Simple GNOME Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275281 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 08:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190823.l8J8N73Y003849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-19 04:23 EST ------- Christoph, Beldi changed and uses now a directory in $HOME unless configured somehow else. Can you please review the package again? SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/beldi-0.9-2.src.rpm Oh and burning CDs on Fedora 7 works without special permissions for me. Fedora Core 6 can't be supported by Beldi right now, because of qemu requirement. EOL of FC6 is reached in a few months as well. Can we restart/go on with the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 08:29:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 260441] Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190829.l8J8TqHc004662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pguiman - The PostgreSQL database server managing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=260441 odvorace at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 08:38:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190838.l8J8cEsX016304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From navid at redhat.com 2007-09-19 04:38 EST ------- Jason, I think I've managed to import and build SoS correctly as per instructions in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join - should I go ahead and close this as NEXTRELEASE ? Thank you. -- Navid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:03:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190903.l8J93lrb009731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 05:03 EST ------- Use following patch to your SPEC --- roxterm.spec 2007-09-19 13:13:27.000000000 +0530 +++ roxterm-modified.spec 2007-09-19 14:29:31.000000000 +0530 @@ -27,13 +27,14 @@ %build -%configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} +%configure make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/roxterm desktop-file-install --vendor "fedora" \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications \ @@ -59,8 +60,7 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS -%doc %{_datadir}/doc/roxterm/ +%doc Help/AUTHORS Help/Changes Help/COPYING Help/imgs Help/index.html Help/NEWS Help/README %{_bindir}/roxterm %{_bindir}/roxterm-config %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-roxterm.desktop This will solve %doc issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:08:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190908.l8J98PqK020560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 05:08 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:07:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239939] Review Request: libggi - General Graphics Interface toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190907.l8J97W7b020508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libggi - General Graphics Interface toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239939 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-19 05:07 EST ------- well actually, there is no problem at build time, but i'm still searching for a problem at runtime (at least on x86_64 and maybe with an nVidia card). But I haven't made any progress last days... I will retry next... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:12:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190912.l8J9CZlx021200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 05:12 EST ------- rpmlint on binary rpm gave pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/optionsmanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/project/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/commander/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/grepper/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filemanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/statusbar/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/openwith/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowser/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/contexts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/rpc/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/help/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/appcontroller/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/bugreport/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/versioncontrol/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/editor/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/shortcuts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/sessions/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/buffer/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/notify/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/manhole/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filewatcher/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/vim/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/emacs/service.pida are those required files or we can remove them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190923.l8J9NNwx022961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 05:23 EST ------- Tested successfully on my rawhide machine. latest SRPM is working fine in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:44:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190944.l8J9iI4d015782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-19 05:44 EST ------- > Tested successfully on my rawhide machine. latest SRPM is working fine in > rawhide. Alright, I will try to install Fedora 8 Test 2 then. Looks like something has got messed up on my Rawhide. I will polish the package a bit and submit it to continue the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 09:51:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 05:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709190951.l8J9pDl8027292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-19 05:51 EST ------- Thanks! Spec URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.deadbabylon.de/fedora/extras/roxterm-1.7.4-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 10:00:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191000.l8JA0ovQ028502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-19 06:00 EST ------- Upstream says the empty service.pida files are necessary for PIDA to function properly: http://groups.google.com/group/pida/browse_thread/thread/f18fedeb32017a6/fd516cd340567617?hl=en-GB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 10:57:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191057.l8JAvP7A003220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 06:57 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM but is silent for SRPM. roxterm.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/roxterm-config Can be ignored + source files match upstream. f1383a5e3d6aa28a2d3817d1171840ca roxterm-1.7.4.tar.gz + Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet is used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + Package roxterm-1.7.4-4.fc8 -> Requires: libX11.so.6 libXft.so.2 libXrender.so.1 libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libdl.so.2 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglade-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpangox-1.0.so.0 libpangoxft-1.0.so.0 libvte.so.9 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 10:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191059.l8JAxoJQ003320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 06:59 EST ------- we can take then exceptional/special case for this package to ignore rpmlint errors. Good to add comment in SPEC that this package installs empty service.pida files which are required for package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 11:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294741] Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191128.l8JBSPJc007472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Change Request: nut -- Network UPS Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294741 tsmetana at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2007-09-19 07:28 EST ------- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 11:34:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191134.l8JBYrTr030676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 07:34 EST ------- We don't need following lines in SPEC touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/nepali/fonts.cache-1 %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_datadir}/fonts/nepali/fonts.cache-1 Change summary from Summary: Font for Nepali to Summary: Font for Nepali language Change cp *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/nepali to cp -p *.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/fonts/nepali This will preserve file timestamp. Do we need to change license to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 11:45:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191145.l8JBj117031934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-19 07:45 EST ------- I don't think we can add a Font Exception without upstream agreeing first. Feel free to request/ask them about that though. There is no need to define madan_version just use version instead. Also -n argument can be dropped from %setup I think. Please define fontdir to %{_datadir}/fonts/madan say and use that instead of %{_datadir}/fonts/nepali. Otherwise it looks ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 11:49:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191149.l8JBnsr9010056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-19 07:49 EST ------- Is there an upstream URL for the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:22:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191222.l8JCME2W004898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-19 08:22 EST ------- Shall we swap reviews again? It would be nice if you could review sdljava, then I'm one step closer to getting bolzplatz approved (funny 3d footbal game, only works on Fedora 8 test). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:24:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191224.l8JCOV1Q014986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-19 08:24 EST ------- Approved, please wait with posting a CVS admin request until we're done with the other 2 and I've sponsored you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191228.l8JCSj0q015590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:27:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191227.l8JCRkHK015541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:28:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191228.l8JCSc6g005677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-19 08:28 EST ------- Approved, about the OPTIMIZE this is indeed unneeded, but not harmfull, you could consider removing this before import. Again, please wait with posting a CVS admin request until we're done with the other 2 and I've sponsored you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:25:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296161] New: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ical.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ical-2.3.3-2.src.rpm Description: Ical is an X Window System based calendar program. Ical will create/edit/delete entries, create repeating entries, remind you about upcoming appointments, print and list item occurrences, and allow shared calendars between different users. For more information about the ical maintenance project, see: http://www.annexia.org/ical -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:39:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191239.l8JCdaIw017070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-19 08:39 EST ------- Fully reviewed. Must Fix: --------- * Source0 gives a 404 error * Use install -p -m 755 for .py file to preserve timestamp Should fix: ----------- * Use install -p -m 644 for the data files, moving them away will break --shortcircuit builds * Once this is done the chmod's are no longer needed, instead put a "#nothing to build" line in %build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:45:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191245.l8JCjjl2018158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-19 08:45 EST ------- Only upstream URL for source is found to be this: http://www.nepalinux.org/fonts/Madan.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191256.l8JCu3IN009887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-19 08:56 EST ------- Found one more URL to the same file: http://madanpuraskar.org/detail_guide/fonts/Madan.ttf But there is no tarball available. Also the license mentioned is GPL only, nothing about exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:58:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191258.l8JCw3vC010016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191256.l8JCuwKc009947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2007-09-19 08:56 EST ------- a conflict makes sure that you can install automake-1.7 when automake17 is installed. AFAIK rpm currently allows this. I'd rather not go the road with the multiple obsoletes. I think using < 1.8 is as simple and clear as rpm currently allows. If someone uses an ancient automake version, I'm quite sure he/she knows how to install it. This doesn't concern users of FC-2 and newer as they already have automake17 and not automake-1.7, so I'd like to keep it like it currently is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 12:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191254.l8JCsewh009354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-19 08:54 EST ------- rpmlint on the RPMS. . . sdljava.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sdljava-0.9.1/CHANGES_0_9_1 The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). sdljava-demo.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. sdljava-demo.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/sdljava/testdata/ariali.ttf ../../fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf The relative symbolic link points nowhere. sdljava-demo.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/sdljava/testdata/arialbd.ttf ../../fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf The relative symbolic link points nowhere. sdljava-demo.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/sdljava/testdata/arialbi.ttf ../../fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf The relative symbolic link points nowhere. sdljava-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:00:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244547] Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191300.l8JD004M020421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elgg - Elgg is an extensible social networking platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244547 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sven at curverider.co | |.uk) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 08:59 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:03:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191303.l8JD3PkS010952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:03 EST ------- Ah ok, I see you generated the tarball yourself. Probably it is better just to use Madan.ttf as the source then IMHO. (In reply to comment #5) > Also the license mentioned is GPL only, nothing about exception. Then I think it will just have to be plain GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:00:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191300.l8JD01SL010214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:00 EST ------- Hello, I corrected all reported errors above. Spec URL: http://zprikryl.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp.spec SRPM URL: http://zprikryl.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp-0-0.1.20070905cvs.src.rpm Description: Linux DC++ is a program the uses the Direct Connect protocol. It is compatible with other DC clients, such as the original DC from Neomodus, DC++ and derivatives. Linux DC++ also interoperates with all common DC hub software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:13:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191313.l8JDDB4t012727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:13 EST ------- IMHO, %{_datadir}/fonts/nepali should not be changed to %{_datadir}/fonts/madan. This may give rise to too many per font directories in /usr/share/fonts. Also keeping fonts as language wise collection sounds better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191310.l8JDAEmU012544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-19 09:10 EST ------- Looks good, simple and clean. 1 comment: * move blitztest out of main pkg, it appears to be only an example/test app, not something required for runtime use. Address this, and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191322.l8JDMSvP024178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-09-19 09:22 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=199471) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=199471&action=view) My spec for the previous release Note: This spec is out of date for the new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:19:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191319.l8JDJvWv014278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-09-19 09:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Christoph, Beldi changed and uses now a directory in $HOME unless configured > somehow else. Huh? Beldi changed? But the source is still named beldi-0.9.tar.gz. It's a bad habit to change something without increasing the version. This version is completely different from the previous one , so it should at least be called 0.9.1. In fact I liked beldi in /var/lib. If we use userhelper multiple users could share a single beldi installation, now every user needs to download all the ISOs again, which is more than 20 GB per user! By default beldi now uses /tmp, which is a bad idea, because - now beldi complains that it can't read files already in /tmp - it bears the risk that beldi changes files it can read/write - /tmp will be wiped out on reboot and people will have to start "beldi --update" and all the downloads again! Even worse: One can't change the download location because of "Configuration::Save can't open file /etc/beldi_settings.xml in write mode." So we still need root privileges or beldi needs to store the configuration in ~/.beldi_settings.xml. > Oh and burning CDs on Fedora 7 works without special permissions for me. Burning did not work for me with the previous release. There were permission issues for normal users and as root there were problems with wodim, it was probing the wrong devices (/dev/hd* instead of /dev/sd*). With the new version I still see a lot of warnings but at least burning works. > Core 6 can't be supported by Beldi right now, because of qemu requirement. I'm not sure if beldi should require qemu because the "test with qemu" feature doesn't work for most distributions I've tested. Ether not enough RAM or no harddisk, but all the installers fail. This is only useful for those distributions that come with an installable livecd. This version of beldi looks so 'unfinished' to me (look at the configuration page) that I only would allow it to enter rawhide but none of the stable releases. In fact I noticed a regression: The downloader no longer seems to accept "file://" as mirror url (I used local copies of the ISOs for testing). I'm attaching my spec, sorry I did not put it into this review before. This is how I would have packaged the previous version. Please do a diff against yours and take what you think is useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:25:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191325.l8JDPIqi024893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #199471|My spec for the previous |My spec for the previous description|release |release. | |Edit: The "Requires(pre)" is | |not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:36:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191336.l8JDaDiZ017765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-19 09:36 EST ------- Okay, I've to slap upstream. Changing source is worse, but this is an upstream issue, not downstream. But Beldi should take $HOME/beldi or something per default as only one user per machine normally really uses Beldi. Independent of this, Beldi can given another parameter to use a common location for the files it uses. Removing the qemu requirement again is nothing big. Suid is what upstream would like to avoid. Upstream prefers either separate directories or one directory which is read-writable to all users. The last of these solutions is discouraged in Fedora as I got from #fedora-devel. It was also talked with upstream, that a copy of the config file is used in $HOME and /etc is only a fallback/default...but looks like it wasn't done in that way now. Well...the version number 0.9 should indicate some things regarding features and stability ;-) I'll now talk with upstream first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:45:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191345.l8JDjfbi019888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:45 EST ------- > file /etc/gssapi_mech.conf from install of libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8 > conflicts with file from package libgssapi-0.11-1.fc7 I have addressed this issue with upstream, and they recommeded what we stick with the gssapi_mech.conf file name. Is this review done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:52:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191352.l8JDqZpG029632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:52 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:50:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191350.l8JDoOoC029242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:50 EST ------- - change %{dist} to %{?dist} - consider "make check" after "make all" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191350.l8JDoZm4029303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-19 09:50 EST ------- Hmm I think I tend to disagree, from the point of view of %catalog (I think you maybe need a symlink for that too?) and fc-cache having distinct directories is cleaner and avoids problems with sharing of directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 13:51:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191351.l8JDp6EI020905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake17 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-19 09:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > a conflict makes sure that you can install automake-1.7 when automake17 is > installed. AFAIK rpm currently allows this. Indeed (although in that case there will certainly be a file conflict). But since it is obsoleted this is not useful since the automake-1.7 will be removed in normal cases. Conflicts should be avoided, but I won't make it a blocker. However, it shouldn't conflict with anything else than 1.7*. > I'd rather not go the road with the multiple obsoletes. I think using < 1.8 > is as simple and clear as rpm currently allows. > If someone uses an ancient automake version, I'm quite sure he/she knows how to > install it. But it renders the Obsoletes of 1.6 by 16 unusefull. And are you sure that the right version gets installed when there are multiple Obsoletes? It is not that clear. Obsoleting only 1.7.9 is clearer as it means that it simply was a rename. And your argument holds if there is only Obsoletes: 1.7.9 If someone uses an ancient automake version, I'm quite sure he/she knows how to install it. > This doesn't concern users of FC-2 and newer as they already have automake17 and I don't think that we should target some users, but try to do as right as possible for those who have old automake versions installed, whatever version it is. In any case, this is not very important since the users who want to do such upgrades and keep compat packages are likely to be knowledgable, but in any case we should do the best we can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191403.l8JE3X5O031458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-19 10:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: roxterm Short Description: A fast terminal emulator Owners: svahl Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:07:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191407.l8JE7Uj4023650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-19 10:07 EST ------- I've wondered about what to do with that one. Where should I move it to: * qimageblitz-devel? * a new qimageblitz-examples (which would contain only one file)? * just rm it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191411.l8JEBoQs000615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-09-19 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Okay, I've to slap upstream. Changing source is worse, but this is an upstream > issue, not downstream. Yes, it's an upstream issue, but it makes tracking changes for us (you as the maintainer) harder. :( > But Beldi should take $HOME/beldi or something per > default as only one user per machine normally really uses Beldi. And how do you want achieve this if not with userhelper? > Independent of > this, Beldi can given another parameter to use a common location for the files > it uses. $HOME/beldi is a bad idea I think, because it can interfere with system-config-users (in the unlikely case someone creates a user called "beldi") /var/lib/beldi is better and follows the FHS. If we use $HOME/beldi we _need_ to create the beldi user during %post. > Removing the qemu requirement again is nothing big. Removing qemu from Requires: is no big deal but it leaves us with the "Test with qemu" button. > Suid is what upstream would > like to avoid. Upstream prefers either separate directories or one directory > which is read-writable to all users. The last of these solutions is discouraged > in Fedora as I got from #fedora-devel. I wasn't suggesting to make beldi suid or creating a world writable directory but about using userhelper like we do for revisor and other tools. To me this is the best solution, the "fedora way": It guarantees that beldi always is executed as a certain user, so that all users can share a single beldi installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:20:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191420.l8JEKPhV025794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-19 10:20 EST ------- Any of those is ok with me... maybe prefer simply removing it for now (perhaps checking to see what other distros do with it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:34:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191434.l8JEYelS004996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-19 10:34 EST ------- I just had to realize that aldrin's sources also reference helpfiles from libzzub that are not included in 0.2.3-7. Shall I open a new bug for libzzub and release -8 with another patch or open the old one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:21:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191421.l8JELhAb025885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 10:21 EST ------- For 2.1.1-6: * Source URL - Any reason you can't use http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild-2.1.1.tar.gz ? (and use %{name} for rpmrebuild, %{version} for 2.1.1) * Redundant Requires - rpm has "Requires: coreutils" and "Requires: textutils, fileutils" is not needed for this package. * %_libdir vs noarch - This package is marked as noarch, however %files list use %_libdir, which differs between on 32bit arch and on 64bit arch. i.e. While this package is marked as noarch (i.e. rebuilding your srpm should create the same bin rpm on any arch), the result of rebuilding your srpm will differ when arch changes (or maybe on 64bit arch rpmbuild fails). This is not right. * Requires - Check Requires again. For example, /usr/lib/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild.sh contains the lines: ------------------------------------------------------- 179 function RpmBuild 180 { 181 # reconstruction fichier rpm : le src.rpm est inutile 182 # build rpm file, the src.rpm is not usefull to do 183 # for rpm 4.1 : use rpmbuild 184 local BUILDCMD=rpm 185 [ -x /usr/bin/rpmbuild ] && BUILDCMD=rpmbuild 186 eval $BUILDCMD $rpm_defines -bb $rpm_verbose $additional ${FIC_SPEC} || { 187 Error "package '${PAQUET}' build failed" 188 return 1 189 } 190 191 return 0 192 } ------------------------------------------------------- This means this package (rpmrebuild) should have "Requires: rpm-build" (%_bindir/rpmbuild is in rpm-build) ? %postun - Just a question: what package owns /etc/popt and what is the file for? Maybe /etc/popt is already obsolete? (Please consider for FC6+) - By the way, use macros. /etc must be %_sysconfdir. - While I don't know what %postun does, however the lines: -------------------------------------------------------- cp /etc/popt /etc/pot.tmp sed -e '/RPMREBUILD START/,/RPMREBUILD END/d' /etc/popt.tmp > /etc/popt -------------------------------------------------------- apparently contains a typo. * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories created by this package are owned by this package. For example, %_libdir/rpmbuild is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:47:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191447.l8JEli6A010129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I just had to realize that aldrin's sources also reference helpfiles from > libzzub that are not included in 0.2.3-7. Shall I open a new bug for libzzub and > release -8 with another patch or open the old one? Just fix libzzub. You don't have to open a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:53:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225903] Merge Review: iproute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191453.l8JEr9WN021114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iproute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225903 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-19 10:53 EST ------- q_netem.so isn't used any more but option netem is supported. The distribution in usr/lib is used by this function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 14:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191458.l8JEwniY011829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:00:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191500.l8JF0H8I012404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-19 11:00 EST ------- actually, the tar.gz was added to the list after I emailed the developer and asked him to make it available. I haven't had the chance to fix the SPEC for it. It was done late last week. about popt RPM. popt.i386 1.10.2-37.el5 Matched from: popt Popt is a C library for parsing command line parameters. Popt was heavily influenced by the getopt() and getopt_long() functions, but it improves on them by allowing more powerful argument expansion. Popt can parse arbitrary argv[] style arrays and automatically set variables based on command line arguments. Popt allows command line arguments to be aliased via configuration files and includes utility functions for parsing arbitrary strings into argv[] arrays using shell-like rules. I will take a look at the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:11:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191511.l8JFBG01014379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 11:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > about popt RPM. I am not asking about popt, but asking about %_sysconfdir/popt. At least rawhide popt (popt-1.12-3.fc8) spec file does not mention about %_sysconfdir/popt (note: at least on F-7+, popt is split out from rpm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:18:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191518.l8JFIjsx015650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-19 11:18 EST ------- /etc/popt is being used by libpopt, but is not used by default. It is supposed to take user customizations. This makes we wonder about the %postun fragment cited above. You probably should check for presence of %{_sysconfir}/popt before sed'ing, because it might not be present (user could have deleted it). Something similar to test -w %{_sysconfdir}/popt \ && sed -i -e .... %{_sysconfdir}/popt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:18:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191518.l8JFIXTb015475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-19 11:18 EST ------- 0.13 is out, please give it a try :) Changes to texlive-texmf: * Wed Sep 12 2007 Jindrich Novy - 2007-0.13 - move configuration files to the main texlive package - remove useless common subpackage and move its content to main package - increase default texmf.cnf limits so that xmlto works - don't call install-info in scriptlets if it doesn't exist - fix some multiple file ownerships - update ptex-texmf to 2.5 - use xdg-utils and htmlview in tkdefaults -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:20:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191520.l8JFKB5x016342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-19 11:20 EST ------- 0.13 is out! main changes are: * Wed Sep 19 2007 Jindrich Novy - 2007-0.13 - update ls-Rs to deal with the japanese support - update ptex to 3.1.10 and mendex to 2.6e - fix install-info in scriptlets * Tue Sep 18 2007 Patrice Dumas - subpackage packages that have a distinct upstream - remove non free parts from the archive - install xdvi icon in hicolor directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:33:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191533.l8JFXnD5028542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 11:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > /etc/popt is being used by libpopt, but is not used by default. > It is supposed to take user customizations. Thank you, Ralf. I forgot to mention more one issue: * rpmlint rpmrebuild.src:98: W: macro-in-%changelog _libdir rpmrebuild.src:104: W: macro-in-%changelog doc - In changelog, use %% to prevent macros from being expanded, for example: ---------------------------------------------------- * Thu Sep 5 2007 Anderson Silva 2.1.1-5 - Optimized postun with sed - Replaced /usr/lib with %%{_libdir} <- (althogh this is not right) ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:34:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191534.l8JFYcJF018173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-19 11:34 EST ------- Thanks guys, I will try to address all these issues this weekend. Work is killing me right now, but I will definitely work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 15:52:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191552.l8JFqpQx031957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 11:52 EST ------- For 0.8.0-2: * First for long sirius-0.8.0-autoreconf.patch.bz2 - Plese don't use such uselessly long patch. This makes it harder to find what actually has to be fixed by this patch. * If you have to use autotools, please use autotools, not use such long patch. * However using autotools is highly _not_ recommended. Please investigate the points which should really be fixed. - By the way, is this really needed? ppc64 rebuild succeeds without this patch. * perl modules BuildRequires (also refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl ) - For perl modules, please don't write rpm name for BuildRequires. Instead, write the module name for BuildRequires like: BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) * License - License seems to be GPLv2+. * CFLAGS ----------------------------------------------- %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" ----------------------------------------------- - Check if CFLAGS option in the last line is really needed. Usually this is not needed (please check what %configure does by: $ rpm --eval %configure ) * Timestamp - To keep timestamp, I recommend: ----------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" ----------------------------------------------- The method above usually works on recent Makefiles. * desktop category - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. * rpmlint ------------------------------------------------ sirius.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sirius-0.8.0/AUTHORS sirius.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sirius-0.8.0/ChangeLog sirius.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sirius-0.8.0/README ------------------------------------------------ - Please change the encoding of these files to UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191601.l8JG1r5i000983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 12:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > file /etc/gssapi_mech.conf from install of libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8 > > conflicts with file from package libgssapi-0.11-1.fc7 > I have addressed this issue with upstream, and they > recommeded what we stick with the gssapi_mech.conf file > name. > Can you explain a bit more here. If this package got approved then how this package can be used on fedora? conflicts are coming from its installation. people cannot install this package. you should look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d > Is this review done? Not yet. Source URL Change needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:01:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191601.l8JG1e1b022680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 12:01 EST ------- One more comment: -------------------------------------------------- board.c: In function 'transposition_hash': board.c:436: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules board.c: In function 'calculate_legal': board.c:578: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:579: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:580: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:581: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:582: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:583: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:584: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:585: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:588: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type board.c:589: warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type ---------------------------------------------------------- - Perhaps you want to fix these warnings, especially warnings for "integer constant". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:13:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253692] Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191613.l8JGDFYB002930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191609.l8JG9phe002134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cpebenito at tresys.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 12:09 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:13:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191613.l8JGDG3v002982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 Bug 253693 depends on bug 253692, which changed state. Bug 253692 Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion - Collection of Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253692 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191611.l8JGB9i7002648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kuznetsovaval at yaho | |o.ca) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 12:11 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:14:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191614.l8JGEN40003276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 12:14 EST ------- Sorry, it seems that I missed the mail of your comment 23, I will check -7 later. Meanwhile please do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit another review request (as I wrote on my comment 21) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:14:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253693] Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191614.l8JGEAxh003221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compiz-fusion-extras - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253693 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:15:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191615.l8JGFD0U024796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:28:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191628.l8JGSBcu005598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://hosted.fedoraproject | |.org/projects/python-fedora ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-19 12:28 EST ------- Updated version: Add bugzilla email for control-center-maint Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora-0.2.90.18-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:43:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191643.l8JGhw7c007834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-19 12:43 EST ------- I'm personally leaning for qimageblitz-examples as the most logical solution, it's also consistent with how other libraries are packaged, and it also scales if they ever decide to add more examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191641.l8JGfRgt028662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-19 12:41 EST ------- Mandriva has 3 packages: * qimageblitz: contains only blitztest * %mklibname qimageblitz 4 (they love macros over at Mandriva): contains *.so.* * %mklibname -d qimageblitz: contains the devel files OpenSUSE has 2 packages (libqimageblitz and libqimageblitz-devel), they put blitztest into libqimageblitz-devel. Debian and Ubuntu also have 2 packages (libqimageblitz4 and libqimageblitz-dev), they also put blitztest into libqimageblitz-dev. kde-windows has qimageblitz-mingw-20070915-bin.zip (the equivalent of our qimageblitz), qimageblitz-mingw-20070915-lib.zip (the equivalent of our qimageblitz-devel) and qimageblitz-mingw-20070915-src.zip (the equivalent of our SRPM), they put blitztest.exe into -bin (i.e. the runtime package). So we have: * the 3-package approach (Mandriva) * the 2-package approach with blitztest in -devel (openSUSE, Debian, Ubuntu) * the 2-package approach with blitztest in the main package (kde-windows) all used in the wild already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 16:59:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191659.l8JGxohp010183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-19 12:59 EST ------- worksforme, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 17:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191708.l8JH8jXM011584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|opensource at till.name |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-19 13:08 EST ------- Sorry, I have a lot of headaches recently, so I do not know when I will feel good enough to review this. If someone else wants to review this, please do. When I am healthy again, I will review this, in case it still needs a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 17:10:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191710.l8JHAxY4000737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-19 13:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 17:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291371] Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191738.l8JHcYJG016292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: teg - teg is a clone of a clone of Risk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291371 cheese at nosuchhost.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 17:41:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191741.l8JHfZeo005905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-19 13:41 EST ------- Marcela, another thing showed up to me, which has to be fixed. You shouldn't use /usr/share/doc/cron - or even if abuse this directory, please OWN this directory in any case. But the correct way would be to use %doc which results in /usr/share/doc/vixie-cron at a Fedora system... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 17:49:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191749.l8JHnHiw017769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2007-09-19 13:49 EST ------- The --with-pam at %configure has to be optional related to WITH_PAM macro. And please keep the WITH_PAM option, don't rip it out :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 17:55:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191755.l8JHt8Wo019061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-19 13:55 EST ------- Here is a new version with the UTF-8 issue fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava-0.9.1-4.fc8.src.rpm The other rpmlint messages are non-issues (the font files the symlinks point to are explicitly required). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 18:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257341] Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191812.l8JICNrP010838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexfs - FUSE based filesystem using ObexFTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257341 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2007-09-19 14:12 EST ------- Yes, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 18:18:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191818.l8JIIXuG022482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-19 14:18 EST ------- Done: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/qimageblitz.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f8/qimageblitz-0.0.4-0.2.svn706674.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 18:16:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191816.l8JIGVD4022377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-19 14:16 EST ------- I've taken a look at the last version and it looks good, including the selinux rules, but then I installed it, started httpd (I've it disabled by default) and then went to localhost/phpTodo, and all I get is a white page, view source shows that nothing was send. Do I need to do anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 18:29:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191829.l8JITFcQ013220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-19 14:29 EST ------- Okay. New version fixes that by disabling the custom function interface -- the two libraries are very messily interlinked, and the custom interface is by definition an optional feature. I'll work with upstream in getting that fixed eventually. http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/calc.spec http://mattdm.org/misc/fedoraextras/calc-2.12.2.1-7.fc8.mattdm.gpl.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 18:31:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191831.l8JIVRHa013956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-19 14:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qimageblitz Short Description: Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 Owners: kkofler,than,rdieter Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 19:21:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290011] Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191921.l8JJLUtD032454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: roxterm - A fast terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290011 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2007-09-19 15:21 EST ------- Thanks. Package is built for devel and f7. I will build it for FC6 when it is in stable uptates for f7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 19:27:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191927.l8JJRX18000892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-19 15:27 EST ------- Looks good to me, approved. One minor nit (can be done after import): since VENDINFO.DIZ is no longer shipped, could drop the related sed'ing in %prep as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 19:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709191950.l8JJocuJ004737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-19 15:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 20:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192039.l8JKdSc9000392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-09-19 16:39 EST ------- ajax you have a typo in summary tag is "drievr" should be "driver". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 21:24:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289241] Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192124.l8JLOVdL007488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-19 17:24 EST ------- Built for Rawhide and F7, push to F7 updates-testing requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 21:24:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192124.l8JLOW9A007524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 Bug 289251 depends on bug 289241, which changed state. Bug 289241 Summary: Review Request: qimageblitz - Interim image effect library for KDE 4.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289241 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192232.l8JMW6OK017539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-09-19 18:32 EST ------- Added BR python-devel. Please try: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:38:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192238.l8JMcBKj018356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-19 18:38 EST ------- The easiest way for Fedora to ship these kernel modules is if they are accepted into the upstream kernel. Now that the license is acceptable (GPLv2) it should be possible. Is it heading upstream? The more difficult way for Fedora to ship these kernel modules is to convince the Fedora kernel maintainers that we should. This is more difficult, because we generally only accept things that are definitely heading to upstream but not quite there yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:50:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192250.l8JMoE8k020156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-19 18:50 EST ------- I did a package for a previous version, it can be found on http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/debian/dblatex-0.2.5-1.fc8.src.rpm This conflicts with tetex-tex4ht (I maintain), I'll try to fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192250.l8JMolSI030902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-19 18:50 EST ------- Don't forget to set fedora-review to ? to indicate that the review is underway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192249.l8JMn52B030449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-19 18:49 EST ------- http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/gurlchecker/ It appears that gurlchecker was in Fedora earlier, but nobody wanted to maintain it it anymore so it was removed after FC-6. Your spec looks fine by packaging guidelines, but this alone does not demonstrate understanding of the guidelines as you built upon the old spec. This package is APPROVED. As far as sponsorship goes, it appears that you have another review underway in Bug #287801. It is likely that Mamoru will decide to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:51:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192251.l8JMpJvQ031106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-19 18:51 EST ------- I also packaged http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/debian/python-which-1.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm in relation with dblatex, but I don't remember why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 22:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192258.l8JMwncM021331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:01:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192301.l8JN1QPg021939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-19 19:01 EST ------- bump: reminding Jens =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:01:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192301.l8JN1rkl021993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-19 19:01 EST ------- I fixed the Source0. If I change to install, it complains that it omits the data/audio and data/music directories, and kills the build. How do I get around that? That's why I used mv to begin with. Also, the chmods are to correct incorrect permissions in the source, not to specify them during the install of the package. Without the chmod, the %clean and %install sections do not have rights to rm -rf %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192314.l8JNEefi001359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-19 19:14 EST ------- Ah, missed that. The version of the package should be 0.3 and the release should be 1 (up the release every time you make a spec file change). If you are doing snapshot releases the version would be the next release version with a release of 0.1.git where the commit hash doesn't have to be the whole hash. I think the first ten digits is standard fare. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:16:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249212] Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192316.l8JNGwrH001912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inchi - The IUPAC International Chemical Identifier library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249212 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-19 19:16 EST ------- Excellent, the licensing is FAR less confusing and explicit now. Possibly a few more issues to deal with before approval: [builder1 at newcaprica x86_64]$ rpmlint inchi-1.0.2-0.1.fc8.x86_64.rpm inchi.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inchi-1.0.2/LICENSE inchi.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inchi-1.0.2/readme.txt inchi.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libinchi.so.1 libinchi.so.1.01.00 inchi.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL inchi.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libinchi.so.1.02.00 libinchi.so.1.01.00 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing The invalid-license warning is a must fix. Please refer to the licensing guidelines to use a label that is more specific to the LGPL license and version. The symlink warning and errors are possibly suspect, please look into that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:38:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192338.l8JNcljI026351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-19 19:38 EST ------- There is a mysql database which needs to be setup but having that missing should not result in a blank page being sent, a useful error should be displayed instead. What selinux level are you running at? Is there anything useful in /var/log/httpd/error_log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:39:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192339.l8JNdvsT004473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-19 19:39 EST ------- Thanks. I will remove the optimize before cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 19 23:47:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709192347.l8JNlip0005701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kuznetsovaval at yaho| |o.ca) | ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsovaval at yahoo.ca 2007-09-19 19:47 EST ------- Hi Mamoru, Sorry, but I dont have time to work on this project because i'm really busy at work. I think, it's time to close this project. I'm gonna give this project to some students in a college. Not sure if they want to continue developing this software. Anyway it's their choice and you can close this "bug". Thanks for your help and time Regards, Anton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 00:04:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200004.l8K04eep007421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From michael at laptop.org 2007-09-19 20:04 EST ------- This release should fix the version/release numbering problem. New spec file: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SPECS/pyvserver.spec New SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/~mstone/releases/SRPMS/pyvserver-0.3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 00:10:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:10:09 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230161=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt61pci-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2561/RT2661_A/B/G_?= =?iso-8859-1?q?network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200010.l8K0A9C9030574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt61pci-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2561/RT2661 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230161 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 00:12:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200012.l8K0CoLc008762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-19 20:12 EST ------- Ok, looks otherwise great after a full review, until I did a mock build to test BRs. + /usr/bin/aot-compile-rpm /usr/bin/gcj -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -findirect-dispatch -fjni sdljava-0.9.1.jar.1.jar -o sdljava-0.9.1.jar.1.o {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:156056: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `-' {standard input}:156057: Error: bad or irreducible absolute expression {standard input}:156057: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,' {standard input}:156060: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" {standard input}:156060: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `-' {standard input}:156061: Error: expected comma after name `_CD_sdljava_audio_package' in .size directive {standard input}:156062: Error: invalid character '_' in mnemonic {standard input}:156066: Error: unrecognized symbol type "" {standard input}:156066: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `-' {standard input}:422422: Error: expected comma after name `_catch_classes_sdljavax.gfx.package' in .size directive {standard input}:422423: Error: invalid character '_' in mnemonic make: *** [sdljava-0.9.1.jar.1.o] Error 1 aot-compile-rpm: error: /usr/bin/make exited with code 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57191 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 02:08:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236486] Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200208.l8K28cZO012949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Profugus - automatically migrates Xen virtual machines from one system to another based on CPU time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236486 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-19 22:08 EST ------- Okay. Free free to submit a new review request when you want. Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 02:06:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200206.l8K26DRh023315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 02:24:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200224.l8K2OJwX025733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-19 22:23 EST ------- OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (GPLv2+) See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 032f976cf82e1ba48702e25545155147 haproxy-1.3.12.1.tar.gz 032f976cf82e1ba48702e25545155147 haproxy-1.3.12.1.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. I think the License tag here should be "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT". The bulk of the program is under the GPLv2+, but those pesky example bits are now MIT. Also, many of the header files are LGPLv2+. It's all nice and confusing. I might try and get spot to look it over. ;) Also, I am not sure it's permissable to change license's via a patch. You may need to wait until upstream does a new release with the new license text in place. 2. rpmlint says (as before): haproxy.i386: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/haproxy haproxy haproxy.i386: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/haproxy haproxy Can be ignored. Everything else looks good, hopefully we can get this approved soon. Spot: can you take a look at the current license situation? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 02:48:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200248.l8K2mqlF029520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-19 22:48 EST ------- I would really rather that we didn't change the license with a patch. Please try to get upstream to make a new tarball, even if it is just for Fedora. As to the License: tag, use "GPLv2+ and MIT". The examples are standalone MIT, the code is GPLv2+. The headers are LGPLv2 (not LGPLv2+), but since we don't package up the headers, we don't need to reference them in the License tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 02:58:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200258.l8K2w5xc031044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 22:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Added BR python-devel. > > Please try: > > https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec > https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-2.fc7.src.rpm This in mock build gave me + /usr/bin/python setup.py install --root /var/tmp/dblatex-0.2.7-2.fc8-root-mockbuild running install Error: XSLT not installed: xsltproc +checking XSLT xsltproc... no (missing xsltproc) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78410 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 03:33:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200333.l8K3XFFp026363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-19 23:33 EST ------- Thanks - Caius should be back next week from holiday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 03:35:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200335.l8K3ZI1p004920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 23:35 EST ------- 1)preserve timestamps in install command. any reason for not using ldconfig scriptlet as I can see soem shared libraries 2)getting installed in /usr/lib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 03:53:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200353.l8K3rPcW007096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-19 23:53 EST ------- good to use dist tag though its not a BLOCKER. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 04:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225893] Merge Review: hwdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200409.l8K49sv7030846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225893 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 00:09 EST ------- hmm. Still pending for review since 5 months. let me again take it for review. missing BR gawk. mock build gave me + make install DESTDIR=/var/tmp/hwdata-0.207-1.fc8-root-mockbuild make: awk: Command not found make: awk: Command not found make: awk: Command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 04:12:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225893] Merge Review: hwdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200412.l8K4CwZd009373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: hwdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225893 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 00:12 EST ------- also got rpmlint messages on SRPM as hwdata.src: W: no-%build-section The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty. ===> Add empty build section hwdata.src: W: invalid-license GPL/MIT The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ARL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "gnuplot", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "ImageMagick", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OpenPBS", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 1.1", "OSL 1.1+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SLIB", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "ZPLv2.1", "ZPLv2.1+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "IEEE", "OFSFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "XANO", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". ===> Add GPLv2+ as License -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 04:31:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200431.l8K4VM1M011797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-20 00:31 EST ------- Just to clear up any confusion, the patch I applied was sent to me from Willy upstream. I'll also check and see if he'll create a new tarball. The License tag I've updated. I'll create a new srpm when I hear back from Willy about a new tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 04:49:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236521] Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200449.l8K4n8hR012155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-20 00:49 EST ------- +1 for a F-7 build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 05:00:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200500.l8K50oQn015796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From qark at ospace.net 2007-09-20 01:00 EST ------- Hopefully last fix (removed macro from changelog): Spec URL: http://ospace.net/files/0.2.2-3/outerspace.spec SRPM URL: http://ospace.net/files/0.2.2-3/outerspace-0.2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #9) > > I really don't like doing any Fedora specific > > fixes, > - Actually many srpm in Fedora have many Fedora specific > fixes and they are actually necessary :) If Fedora is the only distribution requiring specific fixes for simple application (I'm not talking about kernel/core os/desktop) then something is wrong- Gentoo/Debian, BeOS, Mac OS, and Win32 are fine with package as it is except for specific build files. > > I wonder why spec file based on already reviewed spec > > file got so many comments. > - I just say that Nicholas's comment is just a preview. I was commenting whole review process. I'll contact maintainer of the original package and send him review comments so he can fix his package too. If you are fine with this package, I'll continue with sponsor process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 05:13:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225682] Merge Review: desktop-printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200513.l8K5DRui017167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: desktop-printing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225682 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 01:13 EST ------- rpmlint gave me desktop-printing.src:25: W: prereq-use gtk2 >= %{gtk_version} The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. desktop-printing.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 25, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. desktop-printing.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. desktop-printing.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/printdriverselector.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. desktop-printing.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. desktop-printing.i386: W: invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ARL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "gnuplot", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "ImageMagick", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OpenPBS", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 1.1", "OSL 1.1+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SLIB", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "ZPLv2.1", "ZPLv2.1+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "IEEE", "OFSFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "XANO", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". desktop-printing.i386: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/gnome-default-printer.desktop .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate SHOULD: 1) Use "sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' desktop-printing.spec" 2) Change License tag 3) PreReq is now deprecated. 4) Preserve timestamp in cp or install command usage. 5) use make %{?_smp_mflags} 6) This package don't need to own /etc/gconf/schemas 7) use %config(noreplace) for %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/*.conf 8) desktop-file-validate on redhat-print-applet.desktop gave me /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop: error: value "TrayIcon" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" is a reserved category, so a "OnlyShowIn" key must be included ==> Add OnlyShowIn=GNOME; to /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop also, Do we need to ignore rpmlint warning for desktop file installed at /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 05:39:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200539.l8K5d57L020071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 06:06:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247227] Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200606.l8K66NS7023734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nabi - hangul and hanja X input method Alias: nabi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247227 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 02:06 EST ------- Closing this review as package already got built successfully on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 06:19:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200619.l8K6J8JI025199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 02:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > If I change to install, it complains that it omits the data/audio and data/music > directories, and kills the build. How do I get around that? That's why I used > mv to begin with. > Ah, my bad, I missed that there were subdirs, use "cp -a" then (cp to not erase the source files, -a to preserve timestamps) > Also, the chmods are to correct incorrect permissions in the source, not to > specify them during the install of the package. Without the chmod, the %clean > and %install sections do not have rights to rm -rf %{buildroot}. Ah, I see, put them in %prep then please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 06:20:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200620.l8K6KE6t026202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 02:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > There is a mysql database which needs to be setup but having that missing should > not result in a blank page being sent, a useful error should be displayed instead. > What selinux level are you running at? I tried using setenforce 0, didn't help > Is there anything useful in > /var/log/httpd/error_log? I'll check tonight when I'm back behind my home workstation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 06:18:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200618.l8K6IEEO025467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 02:18 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (calc) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 06:55:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200655.l8K6tiHs030107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-20 02:55 EST ------- I installed it in a fresh VM running F7 and I think I have found the problem. The location of the php-Smarty install changed between FC6 and F7 and the RPM uses the old version. I tested it on 2 installs, one was pre F7 and the other used pre F7 php RPMs as the stuff being worked on there isn't php5 compatible. I will have a fix done shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 06:56:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200656.l8K6uDao031163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 02:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Spec file available at > [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw.spec] > SRPM is available at > [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw-0.27-7.fc7.src.rpm] - Does this srpm work for you? ---------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost straw]# LANG=C rpm -Uvh --test straw-0.27-7.fc8.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: gnome-python-gconf is needed by straw-0.27-7.fc8.noarch gnome-python-libegg is needed by straw-0.27-7.fc8.noarch ---------------------------------------------------- What I said was: (In reply to comment #21) > For 0.27-6: > + gnome-python2-libegg is needed (Tray.py requires) > + gnome-python2-gconf is needed (Config.py requires) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 07:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200709.l8K795ud031615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-20 03:09 EST ------- Those files end with the suffix (they are named libzl*.so.*, not libzl*.so). They are actually required for normal operation, so they are not meant for -devel. I need to fix the vendor string, and then mess with RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Upstreams with non-standard Makefiles... What do you think should be done with alternate GUIs? Currently I make the Qt4 frontend a compile-time option (upstream defaults to GTK). Should I provide an alternate desktop file for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 07:37:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200737.l8K7bj1V003086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 03:37 EST ------- Okay for this package: - So I will wait for that you pre-review other person's review request or submit another review request. (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > I really don't like doing any Fedora specific > > > fixes, > > - Actually many srpm in Fedora have many Fedora specific > > fixes and they are actually necessary :) > If Fedora is the only distribution requiring specific fixes for simple > application (I'm not talking about kernel/core os/desktop) then something is > wrong- Gentoo/Debian, BeOS, Mac OS, and Win32 are fine with package as it is > except for specific build files. I will say - This bug is not a place to discuss such a thing - But I can say that while I said "many Fedora specific", most of them are because Fedora's check is more strict (i.e. more correct) > I was commenting whole review process. I'll contact maintainer of the original > package and send him review comments so he can fix his package too. - Having a good connection with the original developers is always good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 07:43:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200743.l8K7hjE9003771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 03:43 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 07:54:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200754.l8K7sMtv005165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 03:54 EST ------- First fix up BuildRequires so that we can install your binrpm and review it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=167130 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 08:46:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200846.l8K8k5vJ013796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 varekova at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 08:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200846.l8K8k76L013847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 Bug 248363 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 08:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225778] Merge Review: gcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200846.l8K8k9tw013877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Bug 225778 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 08:50:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200850.l8K8os2O015816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 08:50:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200850.l8K8o734015717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 04:50 EST ------- preliminary review -> rpmlint complained nkf.src:29: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nkf.src:30: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nkf.src:31: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/{man1,ja/man1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. nkf.src:39: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} INSTALLDIRS=vendor $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. ===> Remove %prep section lines add them to %build nkf.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A Kanji code conversion filter. Summary ends with a dot. perl-NKF.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/NKF/.packlist The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. perl-NKF.i386: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/NKF/.packlist You have a perl temporary file in your package. Usually, this file is beginning with a dot (.) and contain "perl" in its name. perl-NKF.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/NKF/NKF.so 0555 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. nkf.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. SHOULD: Add missing BR perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker Preserve timestamps clean buildroot in install stage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 09:03:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709200903.l8K93O12017573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 05:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 1)preserve timestamps in install command. Done: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-blop-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-blop-plugins-0.2.8-5.fc8.src.rpm > 2) any reason for not using ldconfig scriptlet as I can see soem shared libraries > getting installed in /usr/lib? Note the files are installed in a subdir of /usr/lib, which is not search by ld (these are plugins not libs). so there is no need to run ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 10:27:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201027.l8KARthV031648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 06:27 EST ------- thanks will take this for review and post it by tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 10:32:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201032.l8KAW077032347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 andy at smile.org.ua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andy at smile.org.ua 2007-09-20 06:31 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jack-audio-connection-kit New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 10:53:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201053.l8KAreLJ004169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-20 06:53 EST ------- I have set the sample config file to default to the F7 location of Smarty and check for the FC6 location as a backup. The error message received when the database has not been setup has also been changed to be more useful. http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/phpTodo-0.8.1-0.7.beta.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 10:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 06:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201059.l8KAxLBw005045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-20 06:59 EST ------- Updated spec and srpm available here: Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Please review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 11:25:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201125.l8KBPs7a009655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-09-20 07:25 EST ------- This one passes mock and rpmlint: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 11:32:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225959] Merge Review: kcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201132.l8KBWg0u009329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225959 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 07:32 EST ------- rpmlint complained only kcc.i386: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. SHOULD: Preserve timestamp using install or cp commands. Though not mandatory can use disttag. otherwise looks ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 11:38:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201138.l8KBc76U011655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2007-09-20 07:38 EST ------- Hi, Why is his bug closed? Has GMP been reviewed (then, where is the review?)? Is there another GMP review somewhere? Then, this bug should have been closed as duplicate. What is the new bug number anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 11:40:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201140.l8KBeGSm012095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 07:40 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM gave me dblatex.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 26, tab: line 4) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. rpmlint on binary rpm gave me dblatex.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 11:43:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201143.l8KBhthZ012598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 07:43 EST ------- taking this for review. remove unneeded requires libxslt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 11:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201157.l8KBvjR5014814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-09-20 07:57 EST ------- rpm -qf /usr/bin/xsltproc libxslt-1.1.21-1.fc7 I'm afraid AFAICT, libxslt IS needed, and it's not really a lib! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 12:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201201.l8KC18LU013812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 12:01:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201201.l8KC1T7m015546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 12:23:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201223.l8KCNr9J018998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 08:23 EST ------- For 2.2.1-10: * autotools patch - Please don't use a meaninglessly large patch like Patch0. This type of patch makes it very difficult to for us to check what points are to be fixed by this patch. * Apply patch for the points that are really needed fixing and really call autotools if needed. * And please check it carefully if autotools really has to be called. * disttag - Please consider to use disttag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * License - License should be "LGPLv2+" as no source specifies the version. * Macro style - Please choose whether you use %name or %{name} * rpmlint ------------------------------------------------------- cgi-util.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/cgi-util-2.2.1/test.cgi cgi-util.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/cgi-util-2.2.1/filetest.cgi ------------------------------------------------------- - First of all, these two files are actually wrong because these files uses non-existing builddir. i.e. These two files can work at build time and no longer works when installed as this - And the permission should be 0644 as this is marked as documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 12:27:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201227.l8KCRod4019680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 mattdm at mattdm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2007-09-20 08:27 EST ------- Thanks for your help, everyone. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: calc Short Description: Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator Owners: mattdm Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 12:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201255.l8KCtJ5X024192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 08:55 EST ------- Nasty, not a BuildRequires problem, but it doesn't build when using gcj to build the .class files, see: bug 297961. I've added icedtea to the BuildRequires to fix this for building on devel, trying a mockbuild on F-7 now, to see if it will build with the gcj in F-7. Here is the new version for devel: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/sdljava-0.9.1-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 13:17:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201317.l8KDHWBA026454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 09:17 EST ------- Rebuild fails on dist-f8. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=167375 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 13:27:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201327.l8KDRqx9028351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(shadowarts at nonlogi | |c.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 09:27 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 13:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201333.l8KDXo5Z029479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 09:33 EST ------- Rebuild fails on dist-f8. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=167410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 13:44:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201344.l8KDi4pv031194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From rf10 at cam.ac.uk 2007-09-20 09:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #54) > 0.13 is out, please give it a try :) > > Changes to texlive-texmf: > > * Wed Sep 12 2007 Jindrich Novy - 2007-0.13 but i note that you have not implemented my suggestion about map files, in comment 30. fwiw, this solves neal becker's problem mentioned in comment 22 (didn't notice that when i originally posted). as distributed (without my suggested change) the distribution is essentially unusable under pdftex. and since people are increasingly switching to pdf(la)tex... :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:01:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201401.l8KE1Vnv004200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-20 10:01 EST ------- OK - rpmlint on rpm packages is quiet Should fix - rpmlint on installed files show: (on fc6 x86_64 at least ) W: ilmbase incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-1 1.0.0-1.kwizart.fc6 W: ilmbase unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libHalf.so.6.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 W: ilmbase unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libHalf.so.6.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 W: ilmbase unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libHalf.so.6.0.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 W: ilmbase unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libIex.so.6.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 W: ilmbase unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libImath.so.6.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 W: ilmbase unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libIlmThread.so.6.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 You may advice upstream or maybe uses this between configure and make (or the right ld options...). (Note that this is usually a "should fix" field). # clean unused-direct-shlib-dependencies sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool Should fix - You may add make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p -c" to prevent timestamp changes when installing headers (minor issue, but easy to fix) Must - Well I expect you will change Summary to reflect the one from the review (which is better indeed). Must - ImathGLU.h:#include , half.h:#include / I wonder if yu have to add Requires: mesa-libGLU-devel (and boost-devel as i expect?) for ilmbase-devel, might be needed as BR also... (i don't remember if mesa is in the minimal Buildsys, seems not...) Note that since ilmbase owns /usr/include/OpenEXR, ownership have to be removed from the new OpenEXR-devel package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:18:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251521] Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201418.l8KEICUv005007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ilmbase - Abraction/convenience libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251521 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-20 10:18 EST ------- hum, forgot to talk about the licensing issue. how did you deduced the BSD license (as the BSD license isn't included). Instead there is // Copyright (c) 2002, Industrial Light & Magic, a division of Lucas Digital Ltd. LLC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:44:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201444.l8KEiefw009320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 cpebenito at tresys.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(cpebenito at tresys.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-09-20 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > For 3.3.1-3: > * Redundant Requires > - Please consider if explicit version requirements > are really required. They don't hurt, and if in the future explicit versioning is needed, maintenance will be simpler to just fix the version in one place, rather than having to dig around all of the requires. Unless there is a rule about this, I strongly prefer to keep these. > * unstripped ELF binaries > - Still lots of ELF binaries are not stripped. How is this supposed to be handled? I see no explicit stripping in any spec file in all of fedora. And if you explicitly strip them, doesn't it break the debuginfo rpm? > * files in setools metapackage > - These files cannot be installed when setools package is explicitly > excluded and in this case COPYING file and so on is not installed. > > All files in setools metapackage should be moved to other subpackages > (mostly in -libs subpackage). If I remove all of the files, no setools rpm is built, how can this be handled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:49:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201449.l8KEn7hf010322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-20 10:49 EST ------- >From a quick glance at 0.13, I am still not ok with putting files in /etc/texmf/web2c although they certainly should be modified by you or upstream (the user may still copy them to /etc/texmf/web2c). In my opinion for file in `ls %{buildroot}%{_texmf_conf}/web2c/ | egrep 'c(nf|fg)$'`; do filename="`basename ${file}`" ln -sf %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/${filename} %{buildroot}%{_texmf_main}/web2c/ done should just go away. There is a spurious end of line in the sed cmap substitution (my bad, should have provided a bug instead of a comment in bugzilla). In %files, there is %{_texmf_var}/web2c/mktex.cnf it is a bit suspicious since mktex.cnf seems to be (rightly) in %{_texmf_conf}/web2c. Moreover it should be config(noreplace), like %config(noreplace) %{_texmf_conf}/web2c/mktex.cnf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:55:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201455.l8KEt9AH012006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 10:55 EST ------- Okay, I just tried an F-7 mock build and there everything works fine, so this can still go to F-7 as well as devel, but on devel we need to use icedtea for building for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:52:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201452.l8KEqYat011422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > rpm -qf /usr/bin/xsltproc > libxslt-1.1.21-1.fc7 > > I'm afraid AFAICT, libxslt IS needed, and it's not really a lib! I asked to change Requires: tetex libxslt docbook-dtds python to Requires: tetex docbook-dtds python Above change worked successfully and even rpmlint is not complaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 14:59:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201459.l8KExKAu013348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-20 10:59 EST ------- I agree with Neal, xsltproc from libxslt is needed, the rpmlint warning shouldn't be taken into account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:04:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201504.l8KF4JNd013411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:03:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201503.l8KF3uI8014171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:06:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201506.l8KF6dQ9014230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2007-09-20 11:06 EST ------- I would thrice this. :-) rpmlint is being silly here. The rule is simple if the package name has lib in it is assumed to be a library. Here the rule fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201507.l8KF7DCr015041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-20 11:07 EST ------- Considering that this package has already underwent significant peer-review within the KDE SIG (for which both Kevin and I took part), this serves as a disclaimer that this review will likely be fairly brief, pending my confirmation of * building successfully in mock * basic runtime sanity (ie, does it work and not blow up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:07:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201507.l8KF7MVp015085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-20 11:07 EST ------- Considering that this package has already underwent significant peer-review within the KDE SIG (for which both Kevin and I took part), this serves as a disclaimer that this review will likely be fairly brief, pending my confirmation of * building successfully in mock * basic runtime sanity (ie, does it work and not blow up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:11:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201511.l8KFBMC7015027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-20 11:11 EST ------- Ahha, sorry about that http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=167517 spec: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent.spec SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:18:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225241] Merge Review: alsa-lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201518.l8KFIZJk016165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225241 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-09-20 11:18 EST ------- added to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 15:18:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201518.l8KFI2oC016853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 stransky at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-09-20 11:18 EST ------- added to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 16:34:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201634.l8KGY8G0029204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-20 12:34 EST ------- Upstream release a new version with the licensing patch applied and a few bug fixes too. SRPM: http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/haproxy/haproxy-1.3.12.2-1.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/haproxy/haproxy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 16:39:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201639.l8KGdF1t030018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 16:40:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201640.l8KGeqEK029716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 16:57:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293971] Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201657.l8KGvIPH032090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gurlchecker - A Gnome link validity checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293971 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-20 12:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks for approving this package. Yes, the new spec file is based on the old one. But I am also working on the other package Bug #287801 according to the notes/comments given by Mamoru Tasaka. Hope everything goes well. I can put up this package in the fedora-cvs once I get sponsered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 17:09:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201709.l8KH92dj001617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-20 13:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) I am working on the comments given by you. Will post about the updates by tommorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 17:26:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201726.l8KHQXvi005060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-09-20 13:26 EST ------- By default the new version compiles with: -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC So the extra flags are no longer needed. What I have in %install now is: ---- %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} # install x86_64 in the right place %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|/lib/|/%{_lib}/|g" Makefile %{__make} PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} install # make sure plugin shared library is executable %{__chmod} +x %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ladspa/caps.so ---- Seems to work fine. The perl one liner could be a patch or whatever, without it plugins go into /usr/lib/ladspa in x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 17:39:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227570] Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201739.l8KHdeMM005843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: calc - Arbitrary precision arithmetic system and calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227570 mattdm at mattdm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 17:44:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201744.l8KHiOqE006808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 13:44 EST ------- Ah yes, better now, now it works with selinux disabled, to get it to "work" (only tested up to the please configure page) with selinux enabled. make the following changes: -the correct selinux type for php and normal files is: httpd_sys_content_t, the type you now use is for old fashioned cgi scripts, not for escripted language handled through apache modules. -add /etc/phpTodo/config.php to the list of files that need a selinux type set (extra semanage command and add to the restorecon cmdline) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 18:18:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201818.l8KIIMrk012899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > By default the new version compiles with: > > -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC > > So the extra flags are no longer needed. > What I have in %install now is: > Erm, explain? Passing RPM_OPT_FLAGS is always needed to enable things like FORTIFY_SOURCE and stack-smashing protection, which are not only usefull for security reasons, but also for catching normal bugs. Normally RPM_OPT_FLAGS should be the only optimalisation affecting flags, but when upstream uses -ffast-math, that may be added. > ---- > %install > %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} > # install x86_64 in the right place > %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|/lib/|/%{_lib}/|g" Makefile > %{__make} PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} install > # make sure plugin shared library is executable > %{__chmod} +x %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ladspa/caps.so > ---- > My main development machine is a 64 bits machine, and there the spec as initially posted works fine, did you try the posted SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 18:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201818.l8KIIRXm012933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2007-09-20 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > $HOME/beldi is a bad idea I think, because it can interfere with > system-config-users (in the unlikely case someone creates a user called "beldi") Sorry, this was nonsense. $HOME/beldi is ok, I accidentally misread /home/beldi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 18:52:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201852.l8KIq4ZT018129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-20 14:52 EST ------- diff of specs: < Release: 5%{?dist} --- > Release: 4%{?dist} 24,28d23 < # Build fails on fedora 8 test 2 when not using icedtea :( Note it runs fine < # with gcj (bug 297961). < BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel < # icedtea is i386 and x86_64 < ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 95a91 > 199,201d194 < * Thu Sep 20 2007 Hans de Goede 0.9.1-5 < - BuildRequire icedtea as building with gcj fails (bug 297961) < This also means I can't build on F-7. How will you accommodate that? Conditional BRs, or divergent specs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:09:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201909.l8KJ9p5V021333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-20 15:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/makehuman.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/makehuman-0.9-2.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters The above issues are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:31:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201931.l8KJVQnr024948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-20 15:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > * unstripped ELF binaries > > - Still lots of ELF binaries are not stripped. > > How is this supposed to be handled? - I wrote the method in my comment 10 (and also in my comment 4). You have to change the permission of those ELF binaries to 0755 before %install section finishes. > > * files in setools metapackage > > - These files cannot be installed when setools package is explicitly > > excluded and in this case COPYING file and so on is not installed. > > > > All files in setools metapackage should be moved to other subpackages > > (mostly in -libs subpackage). > > If I remove all of the files, no setools rpm is built, - setools rpm is still created ------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-.root,root,-) ------------------------------------------------- creates a rpm with contains no files, which is a very common method for such metapackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:37:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201937.l8KJb3qF026789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-20 15:37 EST ------- Divergent specs, thats what we have branches for in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:47:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201947.l8KJlu3f028082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-20 15:47 EST ------- builds fine, http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-8-i386-kde/kdelibs4/ http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-8-x86_64-kde/kdelibs4/ passes sanity, we have a winner. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:49:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201949.l8KJnJUk028196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-20 15:49 EST ------- builds fine, http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-8-i386-kde/kdebase4/ http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/mock/fedora-8-x86_64-kde/kdebase4/ passes sanity, we have a winner. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201954.l8KJsxQa029155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-20 15:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdelibs4 Short Description: K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries Owners: kkofler,than,rdieter Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:57:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201957.l8KJvMcA030535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-20 15:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdebase4 Short Description: K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files Owners: kkofler,than,rdieter Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 19:56:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709201956.l8KJuhls029897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-20 15:56 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kdepimlibs New Branches: F-7 We'd like an F7 branch for this one please, with the same permissions as devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 20:04:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299171] Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202004.l8KK4Wtl031382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 dsugar at tresys.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 20:01:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299171] New: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsugar at tresys.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://oss.tresys.com/projects/slide/browser/trunk/build/SPEC/eclipse-slide.spec SRPM URL: http://oss.tresys.com/projects/slide/chrome/site/srpm/eclipse-slide-1.2.4-1.src.rpm This is my first package and I'm in need of a sponsor Description: SLIDE is an integrated development environment (IDE) for Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux) developers and integrators. SLIDE provides features to make the task of SELinux policy development and testing easier. This is achieved by providing wizards to automate common tasks and by providing developer-friendly features. SLIDE is also designed for use with the SELinux Reference Policy, another open source project by Tresys that has become the standard SELinux security policy. SLIDE Features include: A graphical user interface for policy development, including policy syntax highlighting and integrated compilation. Integration with SELinux Reference Policy. Support for both modular and monolithic SELinux policy development. Wizards to create complete SELinux policies as well as individual policy modules. Integrated remote policy installation and audit monitoring, to facilitate policy testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 20:48:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] New: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bernie at codewiz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/olpc-bernie/specs/nafees-web-naskh-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.codewiz.org/pub/olpc-bernie/source/nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing (CRULP) at National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences is pleased to announce updated version of character based Nafees Web Naskh Open Type Font for writing Urdu in Naskh script based on Unicode standard. This updated version has complete support of Aerabs for Urdu and updated glyphs for Latin characters. Guidance and calligraphy of basic glyphs for the font has been provided by Syed Jameel-ur-Rehman. He is pupil of Syed Nafees Shah and Hafiz Syed Anees-ul-Hassan. Nafees Web Naskh OTF contains approximately 330 glyphs, including 5 ligatures. We hope that release of these fonts from CRULP will trigger extensive usage of Urdu over the internet, and electronic communication and publication, and promote the cause of Urdu computing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:00:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202100.l8KL0307007927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-20 17:00 EST ------- There is a circular build dependency when texlive depends on texlive-texmf. texlive build -> texlive-texmf -> texlive command for %post It should really be avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:03:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202103.l8KL3X37008537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-20 17:03 EST ------- So when converting the .zip to a tar.bz2 it should be versioned with the date to avoid confusion. The description reads like a press release. Please edit it to just be a factual description of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:09:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202109.l8KL9F7J009416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |johnp at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-20 17:09 EST ------- blocking on FE-LEGAL for clarification on license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:06:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202106.l8KL6ltc009283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-20 17:06 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=201301) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=201301&action=view) Nafees license I am told this is very much like the bitstream license but it needs to be vetted by legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:14:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202114.l8KLEVmp010240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-20 17:14 EST ------- approved, request for CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:16:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202116.l8KLG9Ju010906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-20 17:16 EST ------- This License is just Bitstream Vera with different copyright holder and restricted trademarks (use "License: Bitstream Vera"). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:43:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202143.l8KLhHv7014451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-09-20 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > By default the new version compiles with: > > > > -O2 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -fPIC -DPIC > > > > So the extra flags are no longer needed. > > What I have in %install now is: > > Erm, explain? Passing RPM_OPT_FLAGS is always needed to enable things like > FORTIFY_SOURCE and stack-smashing protection, which are not only usefull for > security reasons, but also for catching normal bugs. Normally RPM_OPT_FLAGS > should be the only optimalisation affecting flags, but when upstream uses > -ffast-math, that may be added. Ah, ok, sorry. Still, '-funroll-loops' is in upstream but missing in my build logs (unless _I_ am missing something yet again - maybe that compiler option no longer makes sense?) > > ---- > > %install > > %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} > > # install x86_64 in the right place > > %{__perl} -p -i -e "s|/lib/|/%{_lib}/|g" Makefile > > %{__make} PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} install > > # make sure plugin shared library is executable > > %{__chmod} +x %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/ladspa/caps.so > > ---- > > My main development machine is a 64 bits machine, and there the spec as > initially posted works fine, did you try the posted SRPM? Nope, of course not :-( I does work fine. Again, sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 21:56:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202156.l8KLuTAR016466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-20 17:56 EST ------- It's going to be tough for many people to review this since we don't have Alphas so ExclusiveArch will stop us. I actually have Alphas (Some PW500s and a DS20) but I'm not up to digging them out of storage at the moment. Any chance you could provide links to a built package and the build logs? And maybe some rpmlint output as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 22:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202244.l8KMicUu022853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-09-20 18:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > So when converting the .zip to a tar.bz2 it should be versioned with the date to > avoid confusion. Done > The description reads like a press release. Please edit it to > just be a factual description of the package. Done (In reply to comment #4) > This License is just Bitstream Vera with different copyright holder and > restricted trademarks (use "License: Bitstream Vera"). Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 23:12:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 193712] Review Request: sos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202312.l8KNCrKS027035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193712 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-20 19:12 EST ------- If the package is built and pushed out to the branches you want it pushed to, then you can go ahead and close the ticket. I don't, however, see that it was built for F6, F7 or the OLPC branch and it doesn't look like it was pushed to EPEL either. Since those branches were in the CVS request, I'd guess that you have some additional builds and update requests to make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 20 23:17:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709202317.l8KNH6OF027760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-20 19:17 EST ------- All looks good now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:15:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210215.l8L2Fk4e017498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:15 EST ------- The License tag is still just GPLv2+... can you update it to "GPLv2+ and MIT" ? (You can do that before you check it in) Otherwise everything looks good in this last version, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210222.l8L2MY2W018383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:22 EST ------- Can you please use a CVS template to request what you want here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure The reason rpmlint complains about the License is that it should be: "OFL" for the License tag. Please reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:29:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210229.l8L2ThEl019432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:27:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210227.l8L2R0TF018971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:31:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210231.l8L2VkSb019765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210248.l8L2mNlG022093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:48 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this package. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 02:57:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210257.l8L2v1tq024009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 22:57 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. See below - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag Issues: 1. Should the # should be ifarch i386 bits really be %ifarch? why aren't they now... 2. I assume cvs is the Source for this package? Perhaps it would be worth making a hosted project in case people want to work on/contribute to this package? 3. rpmlint says: generic-logos.noarch: W: no-url-tag generic-logos.src: W: no-url-tag A hosted (or other upstream) would fix this. generic-logos.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Ignore since it has to put anaconda-runtime has to be there. generic-logos.src:10: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-logos Can you specifiy a version on that Obsoletes? generic-logos.src:70: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*.jpg No way to avoid that I see off hand. Do you? generic-logos.src: W: strange-permission generic-logos.spec 0600 Spec should be 644. 4. Should this package Require the anaconda, grub, and other packages where it places images in dirs they own? Or should this be an exception to that rule? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:00:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210300.l8L30a0V024065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 loganjerry at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2007-09-20 23:00 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jlint New Branches: FC-6 F-7 Updated Fedora Owners: jjames This is a revival of a previously orphaned package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:21:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210321.l8L3Lbhw027802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-20 23:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:25:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210325.l8L3PmRM027786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 23:25 EST ------- Ok. I got it now. I misunderstood usage of libxslt in Requires. Regarding rpmlint messages, I know they are bit silly in some cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:32:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210332.l8L3W68o029157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-20 23:32 EST ------- license tag is updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:43:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210343.l8L3hT3q030469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-20 23:43 EST ------- Since the license issues are all cleared up, can someone remove the FE-Legal blocker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:41:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210341.l8L3fvB1030405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2007-09-20 23:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: haproxy Short Description: TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments Owners: jjh Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:42:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210342.l8L3gCVL029878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:48:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210348.l8L3mO8a030596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-20 23:48 EST ------- 1) Can you change source URL to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) also clean srpm rpmlint message using sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' dblatex.spec will review then -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 03:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210354.l8L3sxlf031214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-20 23:54 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing. the below should works: Spec file: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/nkf/nkf.spec SRPM file: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/nkf/nkf-2.0.8b-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 04:43:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210443.l8L4hWdp005144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 00:43 EST ------- Additionally, 1)License text suggests you can use GPLv2+. Do you want to change to that? 2)Suggest to add doc directory as %doc 3)Do you need following line in SPEC %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} I see nothing got installed under %{python_sitearch} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 04:53:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210453.l8L4r3iu006100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 00:53 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 4baedbf1e7cacc7d1034c4bcd5556d6f blop-0.2.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-blop-plugins-0.2.8-5.fc8 -> Provides: adsr_1653.so adsr_1680.so amp_1654.so blop = 0.2.8-4.fc8 branch_1673.so dahdsr_2021.so difference_2030.so fmod_1656.so interpolator_1660.so lp4pole_1671.so parabola_1649_data.so product_1668.so pulse_1645.so quantiser100_2029.so quantiser20_2027.so quantiser50_2028.so random_1661.so ratio_2034.so sawtooth_1641.so sawtooth_1641_data.so sequencer16_1677.so sequencer32_1676.so sequencer64_1675.so square_1643.so square_1643_data.so sum_1665.so sync_pulse_2023.so sync_square_1678.so tracker_2025.so triangle_1649.so Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libm.so.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:07:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210507.l8L57wUS007906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 01:07 EST ------- thanks. source URL though not worked with wget but worked in browser. I guess it should be problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:20:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210520.l8L5KSIr010179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 01:20 EST ------- In reply to comment #3) > thanks. > source URL though not worked with wget but worked in browser. I guess it should > be problem. > $ wget -N http://downloads.sourceforge.jp/nkf/26243/nkf-2.0.8b.tar.gz should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210536.l8L5awll011361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 01:36 EST ------- yes source URL working fine. looks I got some problem. its working fine. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 1851260a2719629294740783c14ca3d5 nkf-2.0.8b.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge nkf-2.0.8b-1.fc8 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) rtld(GNU_HASH) Package perl-NKF-2.0.8b-1.fc8 -> Provides: NKF.so perl(NKF) = 2.08 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:42:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292381] Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210542.l8L5goKd011986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292381 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:50:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292381] Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210550.l8L5o9BO013731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292381 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 01:50 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. aa2f0609aca8b698625d86170c426e2c cmt_src_1.15.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-cmt-plugins-1.15-6.fc8 -> Provides: cmt = 1.15-6.fc8 cmt.so Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:46:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210546.l8L5kQmI012556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 01:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > SRPM: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/sugar/srpms/pyevent-0.3-1.fc7.src.rpm (I guess 0.3-2) For 0.3-2: * Still fails on x86_64 (i386 okay) setup.py seems to be expecting that libevent.so should be under /usr/lib (not %_libdir) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 05:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210556.l8L5u83S014548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 01:56 EST ------- Sorry, but please wait. * Compilation does not honor %optflags http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=168881&name=build.log ------------------------------------------------------ + make nkf cc -O -c utf8tbl.c cc -O -o nkf nkf.c utf8tbl.o ------------------------------------------------------ * perl macro - Please use %perl_vendorarch or %perl_vendorlib * Timestamp - For SOURCE3, please use "cp -p" to keep timestamp. * defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Using direct command vs using macro command - Please choose if you use write commands directly, or use macros as much as possible. For example, if you want to use %__install_p, you also want to use %__rm, %__cp, %__make, %__chmod. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 06:31:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210631.l8L6V073017737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 02:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry, but please wait. > > * Compilation does not honor %optflags > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=168881&name=build.log > ------------------------------------------------------ > + make nkf > cc -O -c utf8tbl.c > cc -O -o nkf nkf.c utf8tbl.o > ------------------------------------------------------ use make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" nkf > > * perl macro > - Please use %perl_vendorarch or %perl_vendorlib ohh I missed to check perl macors. > > * Timestamp > - For SOURCE3, please use "cp -p" to keep timestamp. yes. this is still missing in SPEC. > > * defattr > - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) I am still unclear on usage of this as I guess some packagers still prefer %defattr(-,root,root) bu tI have seen you always asking packagers to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) but can't find this thing written in packaging guidelines. > > * Using direct command vs using macro command > - Please choose if you use write commands directly, or > use macros as much as possible. > > For example, if you want to use %__install_p, you also > want to use %__rm, %__cp, %__make, %__chmod. I better should look carefully on macros from next time while doing reviews. Mamoru, Thanks for commenting missing things here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 06:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292371] Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210626.l8L6QkwY017263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-caps-plugins - The C* Audio Plugin Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292371 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 02:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Erm, explain? Passing RPM_OPT_FLAGS is always needed to enable things like > > FORTIFY_SOURCE and stack-smashing protection, which are not only usefull for > > security reasons, but also for catching normal bugs. Normally RPM_OPT_FLAGS > > should be the only optimalisation affecting flags, but when upstream uses > > -ffast-math, that may be added. > > Ah, ok, sorry. > Still, '-funroll-loops' is in upstream but missing in my build logs (unless _I_ > am missing something yet again Above kept for context of question below. > - maybe that compiler option no longer makes sense?) I believe it doesn't, some upstreams tend to use all kind of funky optimalization options, and usually those are a bad idea. For one gcc as in Fedora gets extensively tested with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, setting other options might trigger unknown bugs. In this specific case -funroll-loops may have helped when upstream last did some benchmarking, but on modern CPU's smaller code is usually faster as modern CPU's are bandwidth limited and smaller code uses less bandwitdh (and cache, and instruction trace cache, and brench predictor slots and ...) -funroll-loops causes code to get bigger and thus usually slower. gcc with -O2 will already unroll some loops, but only when this is beneficially (for example a small loop with 2 iterations might actually have less code when unrolled). I think -O2 includes -funroll-loops, but not -funroll-all-loops, but I'm not sure. Either way usually its a good idea to not out smart the gcc developers and just use -O2. -ffast-math is an exception here as -ffast-math is never enabled by default as it breaks certain aspects of the C-standard causing (very small) precision loss in floating point operations, but since upstream is using it I guess the slightly lower lever of precision is acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 06:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225959] Merge Review: kcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210642.l8L6gh1V019889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225959 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-21 02:42 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing. well, unfortunately this package is one of things that we lost upstream. I don't think I can provide URL tag for this package. and I intentionally didn't give a dist tag for this package because the application itself is stable enough and the updates doesn't appears frequently. so I just wanted to avoid appearing the dist tag doesn't match to the actual release. Anyway, the below should fixes the timestamp issue: Spec file: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/kcc/kcc.spec SRPM file: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/kcc/kcc-2.3-27.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 06:47:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292381] Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210647.l8L6lLS4019995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292381 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 02:47 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-cmt-plugins Short Description: A collection of LADSPA plugins Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 06:46:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210646.l8L6kqn8019953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 02:46 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-blop-plugins Short Description: Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:02:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210702.l8L72E6w021910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 03:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Those files end with the suffix (they are named libzl*.so.*, not libzl*.so). > They are actually required for normal operation, so they are not meant for -devel. > ok. > I need to fix the vendor string, and then mess with RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Upstreams > with non-standard Makefiles... yes please. use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS > > What do you think should be done with alternate GUIs? Currently I make the Qt4 > frontend a compile-time option (upstream defaults to GTK). Should I provide an > alternate desktop file for it? I have not seen such package in my reviews but seen one which is waiting for review http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/chestnut-dialer.spec you can have a look at this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:11:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210711.l8L7B6rl023816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-21 03:11 EST ------- Thanks for catching them up. should be ok now with the same URL above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:28:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210728.l8L7Sevd025961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-21 03:28 EST ------- and jason, if you find some time, get your alphas out, update 'em to latest and greatest devel tree and put it online for our alpha koji :-P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:27:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210727.l8L7RWO9025886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 03:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife.spec > http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/secondlife/secondlife-1.18.0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm > > * Thu Jul 12 2007 Callum Lerwick 1.18.0.6-1 > - New upstream. Callum, I wouldn't mind reviewing this, but first the dependencies need to get taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:26:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210726.l8L7QVL4025847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-21 03:26 EST ------- I've checked rpmlint. Yes, there where some small warnings that where fixed now. My only problem is: [oliver at gosa SPECS]$ rpmbuild -bs aboot.spec --nodeps Wrote: /home/oliver/rpmbuild/SRPMS/aboot-1.0_pre20040408-2.fc8.src.rpm [oliver at gosa SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/oliver/rpmbuild/SRPMS/aboot-1.0_pre20040408-2.fc8.src.rpm aboot.src: W: invalid-license GPL I don't know how to handle this. The source doesn't state the exact version and SF project page also states GPL. Is there some Wiki for such issues? I've locally built aboot pkg on my Alpha and then imported; However, after I have fixed the rpmlint warnings now, I've submitted a new build to alpha koji. Please stand by, I will make a note within this bug as soon as the build is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:26:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210726.l8L7QcYO025065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 03:26 EST ------- Okay, almost good. For -2: ? Icon - Can you find some icon suitable for the desktop of this package? (not a blocker) * License - seems to be GPLv2+. * Desktop Category - Category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:48:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210748.l8L7moG2028863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > * defattr > > - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > I am still unclear on usage of this as I guess some packagers still prefer > %defattr(-,root,root) bu tI have seen you always asking packagers to use > %defattr(-,root,root,-) but can't find this thing written in > packaging guidelines. - Actually also I cannot see the explicit mention in wiki, however * I was told by some other reviewers to do so * and all the examples under http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ (for example, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) uses %defattr(-,root,root,-) (In reply to comment #8) > Thanks for catching them up. should be ok now with the same URL above. - Sorry, however more issues: * Perl module BuildRequires - For Perl module BuildRequires, please do not use the name of rpms but write the module name of it like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl i.e. "BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" is better. * Directory ownership issue - %{perl_vendorarch}/auto itself is owned by perl and this package should not own the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 07:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210752.l8L7qWWt028523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 03:52 EST ------- * And please change the SourceURL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210820.l8L8Kt86002192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 04:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > [oliver at gosa SPECS]$ rpmlint > /home/oliver/rpmbuild/SRPMS/aboot-1.0_pre20040408-2.fc8.src.rpm > aboot.src: W: invalid-license GPL > > I don't know how to handle this. The source doesn't state the exact version and > SF project page also states GPL. Is there some Wiki for such issues? License policy is changed and you have to specify the version for GPL/LGPL. Please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210830.l8L8UJGL003804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 04:30 EST ------- >From my quick check license seems GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:30:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210830.l8L8U0fa002093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 04:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > * defattr > > > - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > I am still unclear on usage of this as I guess some packagers still prefer > > %defattr(-,root,root) bu tI have seen you always asking packagers to use > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) but can't find this thing written in > > packaging guidelines. > - Actually also I cannot see the explicit mention in wiki, > however > * I was told by some other reviewers to do so > * and all the examples under http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ > (for example, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > uses %defattr(-,root,root,-) > Yes. I also checked same when I saw your comments asking to use that %defattr(-,root,root,-). But I guess its better to have it mentioned in Guidelines. > (In reply to comment #8) > > Thanks for catching them up. should be ok now with the same URL above. > - Sorry, however more issues: > > * Perl module BuildRequires > - For Perl module BuildRequires, please do not use the name of > rpms but write the module name of it like > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl > i.e. "BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" is better. > > * Directory ownership issue > - %{perl_vendorarch}/auto itself is owned by perl and > this package should not own the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:34:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210834.l8L8Ys0q002852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-21 04:34 EST ------- Without having read both wikis... How did you find out? I have changed the spec to GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:40:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210840.l8L8eId6004042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-09-21 04:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: abyssinica-fonts Short Description: SIL Abyssinica fonts Owners: bernie,johnp Branches: FC-7 OLPC-2 InitialCC: bernie Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:42:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210842.l8L8gSnh005496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 bernie at codewiz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-09-21 04:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The reason rpmlint complains about the License is that it should be: "OFL" > for the License tag. Fixed. > Please reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready again. Done (see previous comment). John, I can't switch the flag with my privileges. Could you do it for me, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 08:56:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210856.l8L8u0Js006481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-21 04:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > * Perl module BuildRequires > - For Perl module BuildRequires, please do not use the name of > rpms but write the module name of it like > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl > i.e. "BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)" is better. > > * Directory ownership issue > - %{perl_vendorarch}/auto itself is owned by perl and > this package should not own the directory. Doh. thanks again. hopefully this should be ok then. (In reply to comment #10) > * And please change the SourceURL. have to bump a release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 09:48:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210948.l8L9mJMm016547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-21 05:48 EST ------- Could we ship this as a dkms package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 09:54:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210954.l8L9siVs016106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-21 05:54 EST ------- Thanks Matthias! I'll add the disttag when I commit it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gmyth Short Description: MythTV remote access libraries Owners: hadess Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 09:52:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709210952.l8L9qWoV015984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 05:52 EST ------- Preliminary review => rpmlint on SRPM gave me man-pages-ja.src:43: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build perl %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT | make $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. rpmlint on RPM gave me man-pages-ja.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/man-pages-ja-20070815/translation_lists/SysVinit.translation_list The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). for all the files in /usr/share/doc/man-pages-ja-20070815/translation_lists/ also, Dunno why so many messages in build.log Use of uninitialized value in numeric comparison (<=>) at script/configure.perl line 239. SHOULD: preserve timestamps. use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update to new upstream release. http://www.linux.or.jp/JM/man-pages-ja-20070915.tar.gz Use disttag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:02:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225959] Merge Review: kcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211002.l8LA2i0x017518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225959 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 06:02 EST ------- change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) else looks fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:09:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211009.l8LA9WxH019421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 06:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Doh. thanks again. hopefully this should be ok then. Seems okay for me. > (In reply to comment #10) > > * And please change the SourceURL. > > have to bump a release? This nkf is not built yet so bumping release number is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:17:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211017.l8LAH4Ne020782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 06:17 EST ------- - please mention the actual changes made in the changelog - should not require fontconfig (see discussion on fedora-packaging list) rpmlint gives: lohit-fonts-bengali.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-gujarati.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-hindi.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-kannada.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-malayalam.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-oriya.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-punjabi.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-tamil.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog lohit-fonts-telugu.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211019.l8LAJYBl019753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 06:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=201881) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=201881&action=view) lohit-fonts.spec-2.patch Here is a bunch of cleanup and fixes. Probably this should be sufficient for this review. Please review and make a changelog for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211024.l8LAOjuw021624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-21 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Could we ship this as a dkms package ? No, the only way to include this in Fedora is to persuade the kernel maintainers to include this module directly in the kernel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:30:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211030.l8LAUJBK021834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 06:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Without having read both wikis... How did you find out? The source tarball contains GPLv2 text file and GPL license text says: ------------------------------------------------------ Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. ------------------------------------------------------ From (quick) check of the source codes, some codes says "GPLv2 and any later", other says nothing. In this case license is GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211034.l8LAY98W022129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-21 06:34 EST ------- Updated spec again to use LICENSE file properly. Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 10:51:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 06:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211051.l8LApCXi024952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-09-21 06:51 EST ------- Fixed all above, except for #3, which seems trivial https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/dblatex-0.2.7-6.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:18:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211118.l8LBIVDp028612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-21 07:18 EST ------- In that case, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:21:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211121.l8LBLvCU030002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 07:21 EST ------- 1)sorry please revert back License to GPLv2 only. 2) now rpmlint complained me dblatex.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 26, tab: line 4) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ==> sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' dblatex.spec dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/tables/table-eg4.2.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/manual.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/tables/table-eg4.1.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/tables/table-eg4.0.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/mystyle.sty The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/tables/table-eg4.3.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). dblatex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dblatex/docs/tables/table-eg4.4.xml The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> Can use iconv on them. Also check https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-September/msg01086.html dblatex.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. ===> Ok to ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211124.l8LBOje0029361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 07:24 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sdljava Short Description: Java binding to the SDL API Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:36:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211136.l8LBa51o032227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2007-09-21 07:36 EST ------- I'm not familiar with iconv. What do I need to do exactly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:40:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211140.l8LBee1O000600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 07:40 EST ------- I think this package is ready for official review. Jens, Do you see anything missing in this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211141.l8LBfg0I000677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-21 07:41 EST ------- Addressed. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/solarwolf/solarwolf.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/solarwolf/solarwolf-1.5-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211146.l8LBkkm7001568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-21 07:46 EST ------- The conflict with tetex-tex4ht should be fixed in devel. For previous versions I don't want to make changes, you should add a conflict. The package installs passivetex and some sty, this shouldn't be: /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/attachfile.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/bibtopic.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/enumitem.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/multirow2.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex/LICENSE /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex/dummyels.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/passivetex/unicode.sty /usr/share/dblatex/latex/misc/ragged2e.sty attachfile.sty is not in tetex, and therefore should be packaged. Maybe it is in texlive, in that case, it could be acceptable to ship the one in dblatex (but in texmf) waiting for this style file to enter fedora through texlive. In my spec I did: # these are already in tetex-latex: for file in bibtopic.sty enumitem.sty ragged2e.sty passivetex/; do rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/dblatex/latex/misc/$file done The tex files (especially the .sty) should be below /usr/share/texmf instead of in /usr/share/dblatex/. The xsl stylesheets should also be in xsl stylesheet directories. I used %{_datadir}/sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets/dblatex/ It is not that obvious since it seems that dblatex uses xsl files for other purposes than xsltproc call, to retrieve the version. However in the debian package the xsl files are in xsl directory and I can't see any obvious patching. It would be better not to use the included which, but system python-which. In my srpm there is a very simple patch to use system which instead of the one from contrib. You can apply the debian patch it only creates things below a debian directory, but I haven't found many interesting things in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:51:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211151.l8LBphx1002403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-21 07:51 EST ------- It was a problem with "open", thanks New patched srpm: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits-6.2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 11:57:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211157.l8LBvZGI002200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 07:57 EST ------- Some comments: - I think "Requires(post): fontconfig" should be removed - see the recent mails from mclasen and mailhot on fedora-packaging. - please URLs for the .ttf and LICENSE file - "cp -p %{SOURCE1} ." should be move to %prep - still wondering if we should add %catalogue but I don't think that is a blocker Otherwise looks ok to me. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 12:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211201.l8LC1ONG003989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 felix.schwarz at web.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz at web.de ------- Additional Comments From felix.schwarz at web.de 2007-09-21 08:01 EST ------- Although I used sqlalchemy from epel testing and not from Fedora I hope this is the correct place for commenting nevertheless. If the sqlalchemy package is used on CentOS with sqlite3 (CentOS 5 comes with sqlite 3.3.6), a runtime warning is printed at startup: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sqlalchemy/databases/sqlite.py:167: RuntimeWarning: The installed version of sqlite (3.3.6) is out-dated, and will cause errors in some cases. Version 3.3.13 or greater is recommended. I don't know why this warning is printed: All test cases in sqlalchemy do pass with sqlite 3.3.6. The runtime warning was introduced in order to fix http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/302 but ticket 302 does not mention sqlite3. Therefore I think the runtime warning should be disabled at least for 3.3.6. The upstream ticket for my complaint is http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 12:45:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211245.l8LCjWTX011004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 08:45 EST ------- Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 12:54:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211254.l8LCshaa011226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-21 08:54 EST ------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: solarwolf Short Description: A Python port of SolarFox Owners: limb Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 12:56:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211256.l8LCukIq012811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2007-09-21 08:56 EST ------- Lifting FE-Legal. Have fun! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 13:19:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211319.l8LDJTh8015798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora-cvs? |? | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 09:19 EST ------- You accidentally set the relase notes flag instead of the cvs one, fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 13:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211341.l8LDfCXF020118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2007-09-21 09:41 EST ------- Thanks. modprobe caffiene -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 13:37:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211337.l8LDbEet019299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253158 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 13:36:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229180] Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211336.l8LDafj2019150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2007-09-21 09:36 EST ------- FYI: On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:10:26PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > Based on the discussion during today's FESCo meeting about the fact that > TeXLive still is not present in rawhide, we are moving TeXLive to be a > Fedora 9 feature rather than Fedora 8. > > Jeremy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:08:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211408.l8LE8WOh025056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-09-21 10:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #113) > I do have packages for the sounds available, just waiting for the license issue > to be resolved to open up review tickets. Any luck there? I have an opportunity to do some review/testing this weekend. (I have a new server to configure.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:12:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225733] Merge Review: eruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211412.l8LECqfN025956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225733 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 10:12 EST ------- Preliminary review 1) rpmlint on SRPM and RPMs gave me eruby.src:9: W: buildprereq-use ruby The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required before a package can be built. Use plain BuildRequires instead. eruby.src:10: W: buildprereq-use ruby-devel >= 1.8.0 The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required before a package can be built. Use plain BuildRequires instead. eruby.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 76, tab: line 1) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. eruby.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/eruby-1.0.5/examples 02755 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. eruby-libs.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. eruby-libs.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux/eruby.so 0555 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. eruby-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. eruby-devel.i386: W: no-dependency-on eruby eruby-devel.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Development files for eRuby. Summary ends with a dot. SHOULD: 1)Avoid .a files 2)use %defattr (-, root, root, -) 3)Keep consistent usage of macros use %__install_p, %__rm, %__cp, %__make, %__chmod. 4)Can't see License files installed. 5) Any reason to use eruby-all.files way of installing files in %files section? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:27:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:27:08 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230164=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt73usb-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2571W/RT2671_A/B/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211427.l8LER8NY028176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-21 10:27 EST ------- Hello, I'll check & finalize this next week ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211426.l8LEQkRT028094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-09-21 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #123) > (In reply to comment #113) > > I do have packages for the sounds available, just waiting for the license issue > > to be resolved to open up review tickets. > > Any luck there? The last I heard was that the original voice talent was having issues with licensing the sounds under a completely open license. I believe that the main issue is that they didn't want the sounds being used in a non-telephony commercial context (e.g. a TV commercial) because that's how they keep food on their families tables. I can understand their concerns but unfortunately commercial use restrictions like that make it impossible to include the sounds in Fedora. I'll ping my contact @ Digium and see if there has been any movement lately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:34:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211434.l8LEYo32029056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davej at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-21 10:34 EST ------- Here's what Philip Langdale (from VMWare) has to say (he also happens to be the author of galeon, btw): > There is a basic acceptance of the principle that we should push them > upstream but we also know that some of the drivers will require a lot > of changes or a complete rewrite to get accepted (and vmblock probably > wouldn't get accepted at all and we'd need to rewrite it using fuse). > So, given how busy people are, we're being unavoidably vague about > when this is going to happen. > > If you're trying to make an argument for maintaining the modules externally > for the time being - the big win is having the distro fully functional out > of the box when installed in a VM - that's what the ubuntu guys are shooting > for, and I would hope the Fedora guys would want the same thing. How can we make this work into Fedora ? There are a lot of vmware users out there, and I think not having open-vm-tools packaged hurts Fedora more that it helps it. Certainly having it for F-8 would be huge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:39:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192958] Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211439.l8LEdwUw029798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192958 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-09-21 10:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ejabberd New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jcollie,silfreed Argh, forgot to change the flag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 14:38:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192958] Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211438.l8LEcWLp029736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192958 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-09-21 10:38 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ejabberd New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: jcollie,silfreed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:08:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300551] New: Review Request: last.fm - Official last.fm track scrobbler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300551 Summary: Review Request: last.fm - Official last.fm track scrobbler Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/last.fm/last.fm.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/last.fm/last.fm-1.3.2.13-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Last.fm is the flagship product from the team that designed the Audioscrobbler music engine. More than ten million times a day, Last.fm users "scrobble" their tracks to our servers, helping to collectively build the world's largest social music platform. Last.fm taps the wisdom of the crowds, leveraging each user's musical profile to make personalised recommendations, connect users who share similar tastes, provide custom radio streams, and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:15:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211515.l8LFF7U4003691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:13:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211513.l8LFDNN3003261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-21 11:13 EST ------- I've just remembered that oyranos is know as an alpha state (with 1.7), so maybe i will wait for improvement before to continue the review... Until then i will do some runtime test to provide a default profile suitable for Fedora (meant using non-commercial icc profiles by default)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:19:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300551] Review Request: last.fm - Official last.fm track scrobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211519.l8LFJgJM004058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - Official last.fm track scrobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300551 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-21 11:19 EST ------- This is a duplicate of Bug 249824 and invalid since it contains patent infringing code (mp3 decoding). Additional information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294321] Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211530.l8LFUZg8006344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294321 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-21 11:30 EST ------- I think you're missing BuildRequires: libXrender-devel BuildRequires: libXtst-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211531.l8LFVVMb006458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nsantos at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:43:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211543.l8LFhkjO008193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2007-09-21 11:43 EST ------- Maybe we should just give up and come up with a asterisk-sounds-free package that contains festival-generated replacement sounds or something... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:47:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211547.l8LFlag2008346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at infradead.org 2007-09-21 11:47 EST ------- It can't be _that_ hard to do it, surely? The CallWeaver folks have already rerecorded it all, haven't they? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:47:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211547.l8LFlfdF008474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |mfarrellee at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-21 11:47 EST ------- Just finished my review of the gsoap package and everything looks good. Managed to build under mock: $ mock -r fedora-devel-i386.cfg gsoap-2.7.9-0.1.k.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while unpack cache setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ cd /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ ls -alF total 8400 drwxr-sr-x 2 nsantos mock 4096 Sep 21 11:42 ./ drwxr-sr-x 5 nsantos mock 4096 Sep 21 11:30 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 58086 Sep 21 11:42 build.log -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 414504 Sep 21 11:41 gsoap-2.7.9-0.1.k.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 5300169 Sep 21 11:38 gsoap-2.7.9-0.1.k.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 2365469 Sep 21 11:42 gsoap-debuginfo-2.7.9-0.1.k.i386.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 nsantos mock 358906 Sep 21 11:41 gsoap-devel-2.7.9-0.1.k.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 165 Sep 21 11:30 mockconfig.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 14935 Sep 21 11:42 root.log $ rpmlint *.rpm $ I'm setting fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:53:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] New: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] Description: Free Korean Hangul truetype fonts in Batang, Dotum, Gulim and Headline faces. These fonts are being split out of fonts-korean into a separate package reflecting the upstream project name clearly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:55:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211555.l8LFtIAb009836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-21 11:55 EST ------- fixed dependencies related to #comment 25. #LANG=C rpm -Uvh --test /home/subhodip/Desktop/straw-0.27-8.fc8.noarch.rpm gave me no error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:58:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211558.l8LFwv0O010886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 11:58 EST ------- If possible I would really like to get this included in f8test3 since fonts-korean is a very large package (actually the largest font package in the distro iirc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:59:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211559.l8LFxFE0010319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-21 11:59 EST ------- ok, I'll check this next week ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:58:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211558.l8LFwAvO010287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-21 11:58 EST ------- ok, I'll check this next week ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 15:57:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211557.l8LFvLmw010221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com, eng- | |i18n-bugs at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO| |235704 nThis| | Keywords| |i18n Priority|medium |high ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 11:57 EST ------- oops please use these corrects urls: Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:04:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211604.l8LG4jxd011724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 12:04 EST ------- I just sent the license file to fedora-legal for classification. Removed tabs from .spec file (only): http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:02:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211602.l8LG21eL011613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-21 12:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gsoap Short Description: Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ Owners: mfarrellee Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211602.l8LG23Vl011000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-21 12:02 EST ------- ok, I'll check this next week ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:08:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211608.l8LG8cu8012646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |253155 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:08:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211608.l8LG8ZQJ012506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2007-09-21 12:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #125) > Maybe we should just give up and come up with a asterisk-sounds-free package > that contains festival-generated replacement sounds or something... (In reply to comment #126) > It can't be _that_ hard to do it, surely? The CallWeaver folks have already > rerecorded it all, haven't they? If we used the same voice artist that the CallWeaver folks used it'd just be a matter of getting the sounds that have changed or were added after CallWeaver was forked from Asterisk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:07:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211607.l8LG7BKw012390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-21 12:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader-0.8.6d-2.fc8.src.rpm I thought about doing something like what chestnut does, but the annoying thing is that you have to do some rather manual surgeries on the desktop files -- desktop-file-install does not let you change the content of fields, so in chestnut's case, if you install both the Qt and GTK GUI packages, both have the same Name and Comment fields. Would be confusing.. I think I'll stick to using GTK for now, and people who want the Qt interface can rebuild the SRPM themselves. Removed the vendor tag, since a lot of apps don't use it anymore (e.g. rhythmbox). the Guidelines make it seem more mandatory than it actually is. I think that covered everything -- could you review the updated spec? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:07:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211607.l8LG7Ikf011787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-21 12:07 EST ------- ok, now it's more clear. I'll check this next week ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:13:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211613.l8LGDPEj013532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-09-21 12:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: biosdevname Short Description: Udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names Owners: mdomsch,mebrown Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: harald Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:19:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211619.l8LGJgTg014427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:19 EST ------- I don't see a 'bernie' user in the cvsextras group. Have you been sponsored? Is this your first package? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-0dbf12f9c493a3f20fae545bb9c1396cb0a88053 John: Are you going to sponsor Bernardo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:16:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211616.l8LGGSKc013238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:22:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211622.l8LGMqA1014225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211626.l8LGQvxk015723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:29:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249824] Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211629.l8LGTOII015881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - listen to last.fm radio stations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249824 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-21 12:29 EST ------- *** Bug 300551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:29:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300551] Review Request: last.fm - Official last.fm track scrobbler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211629.l8LGTNiX015853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: last.fm - Official last.fm track scrobbler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300551 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-21 12:29 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 249824 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:28:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250210] Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211628.l8LGSMc8015126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-resynthesizer - Gimp plugin for texture synthesis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250210 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-21 12:28 EST ------- Ok, It's good to me to (aggred with Nicolas). This package can be approved. About sponsorship: Ewan, request fedorabugs groups on your FAS to be able to review package (if not done yet). then, Please follow the procedure of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:33:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211633.l8LGXsvi015931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:33 EST ------- Is this your first package? Have you been sponsored? I don't see a mfarrellee user in the cvsextras group... See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-0dbf12f9c493a3f20fae545bb9c1396cb0a88053 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:37:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211637.l8LGb24Y017298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:39:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292381] Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211639.l8LGdFPC016673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292381 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211636.l8LGawnP016571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-21 12:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. Should the > # should be ifarch i386 > bits really be %ifarch? why aren't they now... It's a noarch package, and making it per-arch probably isn't worth it. > 2. I assume cvs is the Source for this package? > Perhaps it would be worth making a hosted project in case people want to > work on/contribute to this package? At the moment, it's CVS on my laptop. Will move to somewhere @ fp.o once it's approved. > 3. rpmlint says: > > generic-logos.noarch: W: no-url-tag > generic-logos.src: W: no-url-tag > > A hosted (or other upstream) would fix this. > > generic-logos.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > Ignore since it has to put anaconda-runtime has to be there. > > generic-logos.src:10: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-logos > > Can you specifiy a version on that Obsoletes? Not sure what the last version is. The idea is to obsolete any redhat-logos from earlier RHL or RHEL releases. > generic-logos.src:70: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/*.jpg > > No way to avoid that I see off hand. Do you? That's where anaconda is looking for it. > generic-logos.src: W: strange-permission generic-logos.spec 0600 > > Spec should be 644. AFAICT, this is a RPM bug. It's 0644 in the tarball, and the source RPM is built with -ts. > 4. Should this package Require the anaconda, grub, and other packages > where it places images in dirs they own? Or should this be an exception > to that rule? Hm. fedora-logos very specifically doesn't do this, because you don't want the grub splash pulling in anaconda, for example. This would fall in the same category. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211644.l8LGipOc018186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 12:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=202561) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=202561&action=view) lohit-fonts.spec-3.patch additional patch to add lohit to fontdir names -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:42:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192958] Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211642.l8LGgfa1018103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ejabberd - A distributed, fault-tolerant Jabber/XMPP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192958 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211646.l8LGkJP7018777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:46:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211646.l8LGkhrt018813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|petersen at redhat.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:49:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211649.l8LGngpb018172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 12:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 17:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211701.l8LH1Cp6020519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 13:01 EST ------- Well, now would you fix the issue in comment 5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 16:59:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211659.l8LGx5Kk019957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 12:59 EST ------- For 6.2.0-1: ! Naming suggestion - Well, IMO it is better that * qfits should be renamed to qfits-libs * qfits-libs should be renamed to qfits * Requires for /sbin/ldconfig - "Requires(post,postun): /sbin/ldconfig" is not needed. (Still %post, %postun themselves are needed) * defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Timestamps - For keeping timestamps, I recommend ----------------------------------------------------- %{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" install ------------------------------------------------------ This will keep timestamps on installed header files and man files ! Note: The method above usually works on recent Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 17:16:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211716.l8LHGS8Y023177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-21 13:16 EST ------- I just sponsored him -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 17:19:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211719.l8LHJYWl023327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-21 13:19 EST ------- This sounds doubtful that it will ever reach upstream. I recommend pursuing three parallel tracks on this: 1) Show us that VMWare is making a real effort to eventually get it toward upstream acceptance. 2) VMWare and davej need to talk about this to see if davej will accept it in the Fedora kernel in the mean time. 3) Bring this to the next FESCO meeting for discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 17:25:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211725.l8LHPXFs024816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From davej at redhat.com 2007-09-21 13:25 EST ------- Re: 2) Absolutely not. It's already enough of a battle to get upstream to look at our kernel bugs, and we aren't that far away from mainline. Adding stuff that is extremely unlikely to go upstream is counter-productive to that effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 17:26:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211726.l8LHQSR5024145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 13:26 EST ------- Well, where is your -8 spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 17:42:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211742.l8LHgHLr027031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-09-21 13:42 EST ------- A new release is out, I've packaged it up and it's available below. I'll really appreaciate it if one the folks watching this will step up to formally review this package, so it can go into Fedora repo asap. It seems Ed Hill is rather too busy to attend to this now. Thanks. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:18:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211818.l8LIIHuS032315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2007-09-21 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) I was wrong about the Owner name, sorry. I've been sponsored into the cvsextras group. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gsoap Short Description: Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ Owners: matt Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211821.l8LILQsN000618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 14:21 EST ------- Any chance you'd have a link to the build package and build logs I could take a look at? I actually have one Alhpa machine handy (a Compaq XP1000), but I've never installed Linux on it and have no idea how to begin, assuming that it's not too ancient to actually run anything useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:36:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211836.l8LIat05003684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-21 14:36 EST ------- Sorry for the inconvenience caused [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw-0.27-8.fc7.src.rpm] [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw.spec] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:39:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225300] Merge Review: automake16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211839.l8LIdNac003934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: automake16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225300 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-21 14:39 EST ------- I guess that it is install-sh which is MIT. A comment in the spec file would be good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:39:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211839.l8LIdIYt003853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ | ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2007-09-21 14:39 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=169642 built successfully. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:55:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292351] Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211855.l8LItJwB006765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-blop-plugins - Bandlimited LADSPA Oscillator Plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292351 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 14:55 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 18:54:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292381] Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211854.l8LIsx9S005610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-cmt-plugins - A collection of LADSPA plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292381 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 14:54 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 19:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233775] Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211903.l8LJ3U5A007172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: haproxy - TCP/HTTP reverse proxy for high availability environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233775 jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 19:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211931.l8LJVVtj012721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-09-21 15:31 EST ------- This ticket reeks of bureaucracy so bad it's hard to come near it. First it's quite annoying that FESCo closed the door on kmods less than a week before I submitted this pacakge, and they have yet to update the wiki, which I followed word-for-word making this package. As far as wiki readers are concerned, there is still a tried-and-true method to getting kernel modules into Fedora. I know I'm pleasantly separated from the complexities of kernel maintenance, but I'm really struggling with how this is different from other packages I maintain. As a fedora contributor, I know my upstream packages well and subscribe to all their {lists|forums|etc}, and more importantly I am willing to put forth any effort required to keep this packages shipping with Fedora in an operable state. I maintain several php-pear and php-pecl packages. Are you going to argue next that separate php modules cause needless complexity to I should force jorton to merge my modules and maintain them himself as part of php.rpm? He may not know the modules well or at all. On top of all that, I am sitting here twiddling my thumbs ready willing to do the voluntary packaging and maintenance work, why should I force that work onto somebody else who may not be ready and willing? What this all comes down to, open-vm-tools is a _HUGE_ new piece of software for the community. The ability to install linux in a virtual environment and have the guest vm tools come with the distro rocks. Gentoo has already checked in a changeset for it, and by Philip's testimony above, Ubuntu is somehow finding a way through their own red tape to get this working "out of the box". We all know RHEL is the big player in the IT server market, but if every other linux distro on the planet prepackages open-vm-tools except RHEL, that's really going to hurt its credibility in the ESX community (which I believe is going to explode in the next [235] years). I don't care if I package it or the kernel guys package it, but I'm not wasting my effort convincing the kernel guys to do it when I'm willing to do it myself. I'd like to reiterate Denis in Comment #8: "How can we make this work into Fedora ? There are a lot of vmware users out there, and I think not having open-vm-tools packaged hurts Fedora more that it helps it." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 19:31:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211931.l8LJV2qP012668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 makghosh at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |sirius ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-21 15:31 EST ------- Issues Resolved: * perl modules BuildRequires fixed to perl(XML::Parser) * License tag updated to GPLv2+ * CFLAGS option removed from make. So its' now: ----------------------------------------------- %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------- * INSTALL option added to make install. Its' now: ----------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="%{__install} -p" ----------------------------------------------- * UTF-8 encoding of "AUTHORS", "Changelog", "README": - These three files were in ISO-8859 encoding. So i used the following commands to change them to UTF-8 encoding: ----------------------------------------------- [Joy at localhost sirius-0.8.0]$ iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 AUTHORS [Joy at localhost sirius-0.8.0]$ iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 Changelog [Joy at localhost sirius-0.8.0]$ iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 README ----------------------------------------------- - So now the encoding of these files : ----------------------------------------------- [Joy at localhost sirius-0.8.0]$ file AUTHORS ChangeLog README AUTHORS: UTF-8 Unicode text ChangeLog: UTF-8 Unicode English text README: UTF-8 Unicode text ----------------------------------------------- - The output of rpmlint is given as follows for i386 rpm: ----------------------------------------------- [Joy at localhost redhat]$ rpmlint -i RPMS/i386/sirius-0.8.0-8.fc7.i386.rpm [Joy at localhost redhat]$ ----------------------------------------------- Issues that still needs work: * Will try to fix the sirius-0.8.0-autoreconf.patch.bz2 problem. Seeing the ways to fix this. By the way, when I tried to do a rpmbuild by commenting out %patch part in the %prep section, it returned with following errors: ----------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars error: Bad file: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/sirius-0.8.0-autoreconf.patch.bz2: No such file or directory RPM build errors: Bad file: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/sirius-0.8.0-autoreconf.patch.bz2: No such file or directory ----------------------------------------------- * Also trying to fix: "warning: integer constant is too large for 'long' type" * desktop-category: I think there's no such category in spec file. If I seriously misunderstood you for this, please clarify. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 19:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211942.l8LJghD5014502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-21 15:42 EST ------- The updated links of the spec and srpm are, Spec file URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sirius.spec SRPM URL: http://makghosh.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sirius-0.8.0-8.fc7.src.rpm The new Koji sratch build task: [http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=169401] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 19:55:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709211955.l8LJtlO3015895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-21 15:55 EST ------- I think you mean: qfits -> qfits-lib qfits-tools -> qfits Is that correct? I have changed the names accordingly and fixed the other problems. Here there are the new files: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits-6.2.0-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:00:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212000.l8LK0sHH016676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-21 16:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/fmtools/fmtools.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/fmtools/fmtools-1.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Simple Video for Linux radio card programs The above issues are fixed %changelog - Fix shebang - Fix perm on source - Fix mixed use of spaces and tabs - Remove internal header to use it from kernel-headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] New: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-mcp-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-mcp-plugins-0.3.0-4.fc8.src.rpm Description: A set of audio plugins for LADSPA by Fons Adriaensen. Currently contains a phaser, a chorus and a moog vcf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:21:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301231] New: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301231 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-fil-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-fil-plugins-0.1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: There's one plugin in this first release, a four-band parametric equaliser. Each section has an active/bypass switch, frequency, bandwidth and gain controls. There is also a global bypass switch and gain control. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:25:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301251] New: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301251 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-rev-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-rev-plugins-0.3.1-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: This reverb is based on gverb by Juhana Sadeharju, but the code (now C++) is entirely original. I added a second input for stereo operation, and some code to prevent FP denormalisation. This is a preliminary release, and this plugin will probably change a lot in future versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:26:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301261] New: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301261 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-vco-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/ladspa-vco-plugins-0.3.0-5.fc8.src.rpm Description: Pulse-VCO : Anti-aliased dirac pulse oscillator (flat amplitude spectrum) Saw-VCO : Anti-aliased sawtooth oscillator (1/F amplitude spectrum) Both oscillators are based on the same principle of using a precomputed interpolated dirac pulse. For the sawtooth version, the 'edge' is made by integrating the anti-aliased pulse. Aliases should be below -80dB for fundamental frequencies below Fsamp / 6 (i.e. up to 8 kHz at Fsamp = 48 kHz). This frequency range includes the fundamental frequencies all known musical instruments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212033.l8LKX4hF022629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-21 16:33 EST ------- Built for Rawhide and F7, push to F7 updates-testing requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:31:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289231] Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212031.l8LKVb9A021891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-21 16:31 EST ------- Built for Rawhide and F7, push to F7 updates-testing requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:32:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212032.l8LKWXEu022026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-21 16:32 EST ------- Built for Rawhide and F7, push to F7 updates-testing requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:32:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212032.l8LKWYGC022066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 Bug 289251 depends on bug 248898, which changed state. Bug 248898 Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:31:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248898] Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212031.l8LKVci0021964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdepimlibs - K Desktop Environment - PIM Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248898 Bug 248898 depends on bug 289231, which changed state. Bug 289231 Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:31:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 289251] Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212031.l8LKVb03021928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdebase4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Core Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289251 Bug 289251 depends on bug 289231, which changed state. Bug 289231 Summary: Review Request: kdelibs4 - K Desktop Environment 4 - Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289231 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:42:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283441] Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212042.l8LKgNTw024059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sdljava - Java binding to the SDL API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283441 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-21 16:42 EST ------- Imported and build for both devel and F-7, building for ppc on F-7 was quite a bit of pain, but I've managed to get it working eventually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:44:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212044.l8LKi8VD024158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2007-09-21 16:44 EST ------- I understand your frustration. You may want to escalate this to the Fedora Board if you are not satisfied with the rules as decided by FESCO. Meanwhile you might want to submit the kmod or dkms to Livna so it can be easily installed for users in the meantime. Two other issues here: 1) Even prior to this FESCO policy change, it required a case-by-case FESCO approval for any kmod to get into Fedora. And that included a requirement that it was already heading for upstream. We had outright rejected kmods for Asterisk hardware due to their refusal to go upstream, while their competitor's drivers were included because they played by the rules. 2) Even if #1 were not a problem, this is WAY past the feature freeze for F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:46:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212046.l8LKkJBV024143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-21 16:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=202811) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=202811&action=view) fixes for the spec file Here is a spec file patch with the following changes: - don't BuildRequires itself (and remove gnuplot-4.2.0-ver.patch) - put X11 app-defaults file with right name in the right directory - don't try to make ps_fontfile_doc.ps, Makefile is broken - keep timestamps - ship more doc files - own latex directories, since latex may not be installed - ship more docs - add needed Requires(..) and minor fixes in info scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212054.l8LKsCLF024993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-09-21 16:54 EST ------- I am in vacation for the next week, in case somebody is waiting for responses... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 20:59:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212059.l8LKxiPe026476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-21 16:59 EST ------- I'd like to point out that (unless I've missed something) FESCo has not 1) announced that external kernel module packages are now banned in Fedora on fedora-devel-announce nor 2) even posted the summary of the meeting where this was decided, so it's not that big of a surprise that people may still be spending time to package things that do not have a chance to be included. I've contacted bpepple earlier today, asking for the announcement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 21:20:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212120.l8LLKGxO028796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 17:20 EST ------- cvs done. Sorry for the hassles here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 21:23:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212123.l8LLN1W9029072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-21 17:23 EST ------- cvs done. FYI, I think your "Requires: pkgconfig" should be on the -devel subpackage, not the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 21:37:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] New: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/odt2txt/odt2txt.spec SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/odt2txt/odt2txt-0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: odt2txt is a command-line tool which extracts the text out of OpenDocument Texts produced by OpenOffice.org, StarOffice, KOffice and others. odt2txt is ... * small * supports multiple output encodings * adopts to your locale * able to substitute common characters which the output charset does not contain with ascii look-a-likes * written in C, has few dependencies * portable (runs on Linux, *BSD, Solaris, HP-UX, Windows, Cygwin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 22:20:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212220.l8LMKQTX003813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rafalzaq at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-09-21 18:20 EST ------- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 22:45:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212245.l8LMjpbE007835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 22:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212255.l8LMtMl8008987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-21 18:55 EST ------- Here's the initial review. Most things are fine, with apart from the problems noted below. I've built it on my Rawhide x86_64 box a few days ago, but currently it does not build in mock: - F7 does not have ocaml-findlib{,-devel}: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=169938 Building against Rawhide on Koji failed mysteriously, trying against dist-f8 now, but it looked like a build server problem anyway. Documentation should probably be split into -doc, as it pertains the use of cilly as well, and introduces the infrastructure in general. Your call. Oh, and perl(CilConfig) should provide a version number! MUST FAILED: ? clean buildroot before install: no ? rpmlint ocaml-cil.src:66: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(CilConfig) ? build dependencies complete: : can't build on FC7, no ocaml-findlib* ? -doc: might want to create separate -doc, since it also contains documentation on cilly PASSED: ? package name: hmm. it produces a tool that is useful for programming in C, so in a way it's an application written in OCaml, but to customize it you need to write in OCaml, so it's an OCaml lib. probably OK as it is ? spec file name: matches ? package guideline-compliant: yes ? license complies with guidelines: yes ? license field accurate: yes ? license file not deleted: yes ? spec in US English: yes ? spec legible: yes ? source matches upstream: yes ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded ? own all directories: yes ? no dupes in %files: yes ? permission: yes ? %clean must clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: yes ? macros used consistently: yes ? must contain code: yes ? headers in -devel: yes ? devel must require versioned base package: yes ? filenames UTF-8 SHOULD FAILED: ? package build in mock on all architectures PASSED: ? package functioned as described: yes ? scriplets are sane: yes ? other subpackages should require versioned base: yes ? require package, not files: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 22:53:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212253.l8LMrGQf007844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-09-21 18:53 EST ------- Please update the SRPM. Above specfile is different from that one included in SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 23:07:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212307.l8LN7ssN010539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-21 19:07 EST ------- Updated, sorry about that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 21 23:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709212310.l8LNAi1d011190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-21 19:10 EST ------- Build on Koji failed for F8 as well. It builds fine for i386, x86_64 has not finished, but you need to exclude PPC as well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=169952 Also note that URL has changed to http://cil.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 00:16:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220016.l8M0GiF7018067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-09-21 20:16 EST ------- It is actually kinda sad that Fedora decided to pull dkms kernel module packages from the repositories because some of those kernel modules are very useful, and there is no doubt in my mind that Fedora is going to get A LOT of flak for not finding a way to permit the open-vm-tools into the distribution. Heck, I am mad myself, because Fedora, my FAVORITE distro, is going to reject one of the biggest boons to Linux since Xen! It seems that Fedora is losing its ability to progress and is shooting itself in the foot too many times.... If you really don't want to support them, simply put the optional kernel modules in a separate repository, but that is inadvisable. Just allow them in, and better yet, work on improving them for mainline submission! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 00:41:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220041.l8M0fYjq020964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 20:41 EST ------- There have never been any dkms kernel packages in the repositories, so it is incorrect to say that anything has been pulled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 00:50:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220050.l8M0oV1X022037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-09-21 20:50 EST ------- Sorry, I meant dkms/kernel module packages... But there used to be packages in Fedora for them. For instance, kqemu accelerator... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 00:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220051.l8M0pkn0023418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at infradead.org 2007-09-21 20:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > > some of the drivers will require a lot > > of changes or a complete rewrite to get accepted (and vmblock probably > > wouldn't get accepted at all and we'd need to rewrite it using fuse). So it's not actually something we'd have wanted to ship even if we _hadn't_ decided not to allow any more kernel module packages. The reason we decided not to allow any more kernel module packages is because this is actually almost always the case. If it's not good enough for upstream, it's not good enough for us. There are _few_ exceptions, and we've _always_ coped with those by carrying patches in the kernel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 01:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220106.l8M160nL025189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-21 21:05 EST ------- Updated version: Fix build on rawhide Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora-0.2.90.18-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 01:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220111.l8M1BgbU025790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-21 21:11 EST ------- The license is now on the Licensing page as Baekmuk: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 01:48:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220148.l8M1mMjp028322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 21:48 EST ------- kqemu has never been shipped in Fedora. There is at least one third-party repository which ships a dkms package of it. For that matter, there has never been a dmks-based kernel module package in Fedora. dkms itself is shipped, of course. There have only been two kernel modules shipped in Fedora which are not part of the kernel package: kmod-em8300 and kmod-sysprof. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 02:24:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220224.l8M2Of6a000313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 22:24 EST ------- Looks pretty good to me. rpmbuild says: python-fedora-infrastructure.noarch: W: no-documentation which is no big deal. There's a typo in the Source0 line (should be toshio.fedorapeople.org). I'm curious about the zero-length __init__.py files; I figured rpmlint would complain about them but they're explicitly exempted from the check so I suppose they're required. * source files match upstream: aeeee4d9a2dace30ff60fa0ec86540c26b65e825e84b99124f2de42eee13f91d python-fedora-0.2.90.18.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: python-fedora-0.2.90.18-2.fc8.noarch.rpm python-fedora = 0.2.90.18-2.fc8 = python(abi) = 2.5 python-simplejson python-fedora-infrastructure-0.2.90.18-2.fc8.noarch.rpm python-fedora-infrastructure = 0.2.90.18-2.fc8 = python(abi) = 2.5 python-fedora = 0.2.90.18-2.fc8 python-psycopg2 python-sqlalchemy * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. You wrote this so I assume you know if it works or not. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED; the only needed change I see is the Source0 line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 02:26:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220226.l8M2QLbY000970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2007-09-21 22:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-12.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 02:26:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220226.l8M2QeBO001017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-21 22:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I'd like to point out that (unless I've missed something) FESCo has not 1) > announced that external kernel module packages are now banned in Fedora on > fedora-devel-announce nor 2) even posted the summary of the meeting where this > was decided, so it's not that big of a surprise that people may still be > spending time to package things that do not have a chance to be included. I've > contacted bpepple earlier today, asking for the announcement. AFAIK, FESCO has not yet got their final conclusion. Its not yet made public whether to ban kernel module or accept them. I think this is second time I am asking FESCO to make decision in public early(whatever maybe either ban kernel modules or accept needed kernel modules only). I already raised this issue on fedora-devel. If its been unclear to FESCO itself then people will not stop submitting kernel module packages and same discussion will get forked again and again whether to accept or ban kernel modules and which one is good kmod or dkms packaging? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 02:51:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220251.l8M2pxW4006134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2007-09-21 22:51 EST ------- Till posted the IRC log from last week's FESCo meeting in Comment #4 where they voted 8-1 (Thanks jtibbs, you've got my vote any day of the week) on this very matter. I agree with you that the decision hasn't been made public (yet), but that doesn't mean FESCo is unclear / undecided on the matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 03:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220303.l8M33WYS007708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-21 23:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Created an attachment (id=188341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=188341&action=view) [edit] > Mock Build Failure Log > > Here's the build log from Mock. If I get some free time, I'll look at it a bit > to see what's causing the failure. This is because "python-devel" is missing from BuildRequires. Note: libtheora.so reloc problem is perhaps solved by bug 253591 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 03:19:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257381] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220319.l8M3JAt7010038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.3 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257381 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-21 23:19 EST ------- This is a review ticket for a new package. Please open a new bug against python-sqlalchemy targetting either of Product: Fedora Version: 7 or Product: Fedora EPEL Version: 5. I'd be happy to merge whatever fix upstream thinks is appropriate. Seeing as 0.3.10 may be the last release of the 0.3 line, I would be willing to take a patch if upstream verifies that the correct fix is to disable the warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 03:41:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240169] Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220341.l8M3f8fk012852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240169 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 23:41 EST ------- This deserves a review as llvm is being used all over the place these days. However, I'm not sure I'm up to tackling this on my own, but I can at least give it a little attention. Here are a few comments after a quick skim: URL has a typo (extra period). Upstream released 2.0 not long after this package was submitted. The License: tag for the NCSA license is just "NCSA". Other License: tags will need updating for current licensing guidelines; I think the GCC versions included are GPLv2+ but I didn't check. You probably do want to build the documentation in the final package. The compiler packages seem to meet the naming conventions used by other cross-compilers (avr-gcc, etc.) so that's OK. The build fails for me in curent rawhide, although frankly I don't understand what's up unless the system headers have suddenly become broken: if g++ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support -I/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support -I/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_DEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter -c -MD -MT /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.o -MP -MF /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.LACXXd Allocator.cpp -o /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.o ;\ then /bin/mv -f "/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.LACXXd" "/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.d"; \ else /bin/rm -f "/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.LACXXd"; exit 1; fi /usr/include/bits/unistd.h: In function 'int gethostname(char*, size_t)': /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:225: error: declaration of 'int gethostname(char*, size_t) throw ()' throws different exceptions /usr/include/unistd.h:845: error: from previous declaration 'int gethostname(char*, size_t)' /usr/include/bits/unistd.h: In function 'int getdomainname(char*, size_t)': /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:243: error: declaration of 'int getdomainname(char*, size_t) throw ()' throws different exceptions /usr/include/unistd.h:864: error: from previous declaration 'int getdomainname(char*, size_t)' Allocator.cpp: In member function 'void* llvm::BumpPtrAllocator::Allocate(unsigned int, unsigned int)': Allocator.cpp:95: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules make[1]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/lib/Support/Release/Allocator.o] Error 1 I can't say much more without building it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 03:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241597] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220344.l8M3iJQ8011723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tidy - (X)HTML validation in a Perl object Alias: perl-HTML-Tidy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241597 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 23:44 EST ------- I get 403: Forbidden when trying to fetch the package, and there's been no reply to the existing commentary. Setting NEEDINFO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 03:49:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220349.l8M3npqd013485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 23:49 EST ------- Please, one package review per ticket. If this package require perl-File-Tempdir, create a separate ticket for that package and have this ticket depend on that one. Also note that there's a more recent version of Mail::Audit available. Finally, when you make any change to your package at all, please increase the Release: number and put up fresh links. I am unable to fetch either of the src.rpms from comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 03:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240169] Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220359.l8M3xL7I013455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240169 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-21 23:59 EST ------- Turns out that build error is a problem with rawhide G++: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-September/msg01647.html I'll try rebuilding this when the fix makes it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 04:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220403.l8M43HwP015097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-22 00:03 EST ------- I have to wonder about this; it's not useful without Cisco firmware, which we can't give out. We can't even tell anyone where to get it, since it is only available to Cisco customers. So I'm not sure whether this package is acceptable for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 04:43:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244623] Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220443.l8M4hMPW019514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OggConvert - OggConvert is a small GNOME utility that uses GStreamer to convert media files to the licence-free Theora and Vorbis formats. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244623 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-09-22 00:43 EST ------- Hopefully this is the last one I have to do... I fixed all the requires and BuildRequires. Fixed and readded python-devel (that one shouldn't have been removed...) Spec URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/SPECS/oggconvert.spec RPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/noarch/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-11.fc7.noarch.rpm md5sum: 93c94b991f7851762dea0fc36c80a24f sha1sum: 7b0b0106caa44b25f403cbc2552ade7ec7844dc8 SRPM URL: http://rpm.rgw-net.com/RPMS/fc7/SRPMS/oggconvert-0.2.1.1-11.fc7.src.rpm md5sum: e893f627f489c2c9b9e0481f75f16e2a sha1sum: 52837b37c93726dd367c4878e413f8c6b92f557c This rpm are digitally signed and the GPG key is available, the instructions for my GPG key are at rpm.rgw-net.com (my first name is Neal) mock should build fine for this, aside from my GPG key if it isn't imported... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 04:42:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250463] Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220442.l8M4gLS5018373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvserver - Python interface to the Linux-VServer kernel interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250463 ------- Additional Comments From michael at laptop.org 2007-09-22 00:42 EST ------- Thanks again for the detailed, helpful reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 04:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220447.l8M4l3nS020059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-22 00:47 EST ------- FESCO, Am I supposed to look at wikipages for what happened last week's meeting? I thought its usual way of FESCO to post minutes of meeting on fedora-devel. I guess If I have not missed any mail I have not seen FESCO meeting minutes got posted to fedora-devel after 2007-09-06 meeting. How am I supposed to know what decisions were made in last FESCO meeting? Brandon, Sorry, I missed that comment to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 04:55:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220455.l8M4tNd7021138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-22 00:55 EST ------- Might I ask why you think a comment in a random bugzilla ticket is the proper way to reach FESCO? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 05:37:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220537.l8M5bK0q024409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-22 01:37 EST ------- Sure(In reply to comment #22) > Might I ask why you think a comment in a random bugzilla ticket is the proper > way to reach FESCO? > Sure. I saw most of peoples related to FESCO and Kernel module packaging are commenting here. So I took the opportunity to continue the forked (Kernel modules) discussion. Do you want me to ask the same(again and again whether kernel modules are banned or not?) in Fedora-devel mailing list as I can't see any mail on fedora-devel/fedora-announce saying like that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 05:40:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220540.l8M5eolw026202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(david at fetter.org) |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-22 01:40 EST ------- Drat, I thought I had CC'd myself on this ticket but somehow I hadn't and missed your response. Plus it's still in NEEDINFO; I'm not sure why it didn't get set back. Perhaps you didn't check the "I am providing the requested info..." checkbox, although I didn't think it was required. I'll go ahead and review this (although most folks would ask you to cut a new srpm). But we still need to work out perl-Config-Std before I'm going to sponsor you, and there's been no reply there in nearly two months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 06:27:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220627.l8M6RBXC029852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-22 02:27 EST ------- Buildlogs will be here: http://buildsys.zero42.at/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42104, as soon as finished.... XP1000 is fine, not the fastest one, but for testing well enough. Installing Fedora Linux on that machine, I would wait for our new isos that I will hopefully produce soon... It will include new kernel and new glibc - some syscall fixes that I currently don't want to ship via yum, as it might break (many) things - especially if you don't install it the RightWay(tm). :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 06:43:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220643.l8M6hXKp000308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2007-09-22 02:43 EST ------- The __init__.py files are required for Python to see those directories as containing modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 07:10:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220710.l8M7AWY9002168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 03:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) * Naming > I think you mean: > qfits -> qfits-lib > qfits-tools -> qfits > Is that correct? - Yes, however * Many packagers seem to choose -libs, not -lib: so IMO qfits-libs qfits qfits-devel (not qfits-libs-devel) is better * Also, qfits should have "qfits-libs = %{version}-%{release}" (and qfits-devel should have "qfits-libs = %{version}-%{release}") * Group - IMO it is better that the Group of qfits-libs is "System Environment/Libraries". * %check - As source code has test/ subdirectory and "make check" can be executed, please add %check stage and do "make check". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 09:08:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709220908.l8M98bxN017544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-22 05:08 EST ------- Fixed the build issue in -3 : http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool-0.6.1-3.fc7.src.rpm Successful build in dist-f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=170243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 09:26:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301571] New: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301571 Summary: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/opengl-games-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/opengl-games-utils-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains various shell scripts which are intented for use by 3D games packages. These shell scripts can be used to check if direct rendering is available before launching an OpenGL game. This package is intended for use by other packages and is not intended for direct end user use! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:06:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301571] Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221006.l8MA6j10024148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301571 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-22 06:06 EST ------- formal review is here: OK source files match upstream as it is upstream (packager = author) OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (development/i386). OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates (in fact there are none). OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:11:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221011.l8MAB9sZ026293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 bernie at codewiz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:14:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221014.l8MAEMJ3024903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-22 06:14 EST ------- Latest SRPM: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/phpTodo-0.8.1-0.8.beta.src.rpm selinux changed as above and /var/cache/phpTodo/ also added to selinux. the initial database schema has also been patched such that it works with the fedora supplied version of mySQL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:17:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221017.l8MAHP2Z025529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-22 06:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Spec URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader.spec > SRPM URL: http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader-0.8.6d-2.fc8.src.rpm > > I thought about doing something like what chestnut does, but the annoying thing > is that you have to do some rather manual surgeries on the desktop files -- > desktop-file-install does not let you change the content of fields, so in > chestnut's case, if you install both the Qt and GTK GUI packages, both have the > same Name and Comment fields. Would be confusing.. > > I think I'll stick to using GTK for now, and people who want the Qt interface > can rebuild the SRPM themselves. > > Removed the vendor tag, since a lot of apps don't use it anymore (e.g. > rhythmbox). the Guidelines make it seem more mandatory than it actually is. > But good to follow what current guidelines said. So you should add vendor tag. > I think that covered everything -- could you review the updated spec? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:21:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221021.l8MALL4b027597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-22 06:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. fe40296a7515f506c6b46a0ec7f056eb fmcontrol.tar.gz 4bae0e5feeb8cbf4cfcb950301e9509d fmtools-1.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package fmtools-1.0.2-2.fc8 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:25:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221025.l8MAPgAs026589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-22 06:25 EST ------- I assumed that I should follow vendor_tag as discussed in one thread https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01785.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] New: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli-1.4.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is the MySQL Improved MDB2 driver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:38:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221038.l8MAcS6A029730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-22 06:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fmtools Short Description: Simple Video for Linux radio card programs Owners: kwizart Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:38:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221038.l8MAcnxs028225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 10:37:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221037.l8MAbTVe028158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-22 06:37 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/makehuman.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/makehuman/makehuman-0.9-3.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters I've took an icon from the makehuman pixmaps subdir. Issues are fixed with release 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 11:12:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221112.l8MBCOlG032481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 07:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > * desktop-category: I think there's no such category in spec file. If I > seriously misunderstood you for this, please clarify. Please check the real desktop file ----------------------------------------------- $ cat /usr/share/applications/fedora-sirius.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Sirius Name[de]=Sirius Name[fr]=Sirius Name[ru]=?????? Name[sv]=Sirius Comment=Sirius, a othello playing program Exec=sirius Icon=sirius.png Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=GNOME;Application;Game; X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.13 ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 11:40:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221140.l8MBe8wc005402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 07:40 EST ------- Well, -12 srpm contains some problems. * Builds does not honor Fedora specific compilation flags. * libcgi-util.so does not have soname -------------------------------------------------- gcc -g -Wall -ansi -pedantic -fPIC cgi-util.c -c -o libcgi-util.o gcc -shared libcgi-util.o -o libcgi-util.so -------------------------------------------------- You must use linker option. * Permission of the library is not right -------------------------------------------------- + /usr/bin/install -D -m 0644 libcgi-util.so /var/tmp/cgi-util-2.2.1-12.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/lib/libcgi-util.so.2.2.1 -------------------------------------------------- Permission should be 0755. * And for symlink: -------------------------------------------------- + ln -s /usr/lib/libcgi-util.so.2.2.1 /var/tmp/cgi-util-2.2.1-12.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/lib/libcgi-util.so -------------------------------------------------- This symlink must be relative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 12:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221239.l8MCdCvF012786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 08:39 EST ------- * Still "Requires: pygtk2-libglade" is missing. * And I will wait for your pre-review or another review request (as comment 21) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 13:23:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221323.l8MDNpaF018479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 09:23 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (makehuman) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 13:25:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221325.l8MDPdRl017384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-22 09:25 EST ------- Looks good, approved! I'm ready to sponsor you now, please create a Fedora Account and request CVS extras group membership, then I'll ack that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 13:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301571] Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221329.l8MDTbHO017655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301571 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-22 09:29 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opengl-games-utils Short Description: Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 13:35:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221335.l8MDZaGU020301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-22 09:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: makehuman Short Description: Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters Owners: kwizart Branches: F-7 FC-6 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 14:03:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221403.l8ME3B13023678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-22 10:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) Oh!! I got it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 14:15:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221415.l8MEFtNa023856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 14:31:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221431.l8MEVSfT027508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 10:31 EST ------- Weird discussion. Ray Strode argued against vendor_tag, and Rex Dieter admitted to not liking it very much but insisting that it still be applied. I've re-added the vendor tag; not changing the release number as this has not escaped to the wild yet. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 14:54:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221454.l8MEsCSW030238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-22 10:54 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint : W: no-documentation * The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. * The spec file name match the base package * The package must the PHP Packaging Guidelines * Fedora approved license (BSD) * License field in the package spec file match the actual license * The spec file is written in American English * The spec file is legible * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source eb93eb4687da1a1018c832622da42f6f MDB2_Driver_mysqli-1.4.1.tgz * build in mock (F-7, noarch) * All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires * no locales * no shared library files * package own all directories that it creates * Package don't own files or directories already owned by other packages * no duplicate files * Permissions on files are set properly * %clean section * package consistently use macros * The package contain code * no documentation * no library * no desktop file * %install, start with rm -rf %{buildroot} * All filenames are valid UTF-8 * scriptlets are sane* * Final Provides ok php-pear(MDB2_Driver_mysqli) = 1.4.1 php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli = 1.4.1-1.fc8 * Final Requires see below /usr/bin/pear php-pear(MDB2) >= 2.3.0 php-pear(PEAR) Tests run (after installation/configuration as usually) but with some errors that should probably be reported upstream (case problem in table name (win32) p.e.) MUST : Requires php-pear(MDB2) >= 2.4.1 according to upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 14:59:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221459.l8MExXQI030876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-22 10:59 EST ------- Have you been sponsored ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 15:03:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221503.l8MF39hB029926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 11:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Have you been sponsored ? > Now I am sponsoring Alexander (bug 275831) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 15:15:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221515.l8MFFpHf031487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-22 11:15 EST ------- Thanks, cvsextras group has been requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 15:36:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221536.l8MFaGw2001435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 15:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] New: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-RMagick/ruby-RMagick.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/ruby-RMagick/ruby-RMagick-2.0.0-0.1.beta4.fc8.src.rpm koji rebuild results (on dist-f8) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=170506 Result rpms are under (for rawhide) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_170506/ Rpmlint (on rawhide) ------------------------------------------------------- ruby-RMagick-doc.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ruby-RMagick-doc-2.0.0/ex/images/model.miff ------------------------------------------------------- - However, this file is actually a image file, not a text file.. Description: RMagick is an interface between the Ruby programming language and the ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick image processing libraries. Note for reviewers: Due to ImageMagick config file, currently this srpm supports only rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:02:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221602.l8MG2Dar005836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-22 12:02 EST ------- Thanks for your review :-) * rpmlint : W: no-documentation Upstream does not provide any documentation for this package Pear::MDB2 required version is fixed, news URLs are : Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli/php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli-1.4.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221602.l8MG24GV004418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 12:02 EST ------- *** Bug 246716 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246716] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221602.l8MG23kZ004394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 12:02 EST ------- Nicolas: If you have rawhide machine, I resubmitted a new review request of this package as bug 301711. I would appreviate it if you would review the new one again (currently only rawhide is supported). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 301711 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:14:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221614.l8MGEgd7007116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:13:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221613.l8MGDgqw005661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-22 12:13 EST ------- * Final Requires OK /usr/bin/pear php-pear(MDB2) >= 2.4.1 php-pear(PEAR) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:25:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221625.l8MGP4aU007369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 12:25 EST ------- Almost clean. For 0.6.1-3: * SourceURL - For sourceforge source, please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Desktop category ---------------------------------------------------- Categories=Application;System;X-Fedora; ---------------------------------------------------- - Both "Application" "X-Fedora" are deprecated and should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 16:48:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221648.l8MGm2kX010002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-22 12:48 EST ------- I fixed both in 0.6.1-4: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/qpxtool-0.6.1-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 17:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245357] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-syncml - plugin for using syncml with opensync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221702.l8MH23dx013117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-syncml - plugin for using syncml with opensync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245357 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 13:02 EST ------- I can't sponsor (have you e-mailed fedora-devel or ask on the IRC channel?), but here's a quick review: - License field is wrong. It is LGPL version 2.1 or above, which using the old guideline would have been LGPL, and the new license guideline requires you to state it as LGPLv2+ - Syncml should be capitalized properly: SyncML - In %changelog, don't insert a linebreak between your contact detail and the version-release info. Also, avoid smiley and capitalize your name properly? - Description should not just copy %{summary} Package builds fine in mock for F-7 Looks good otherwise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 17:03:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221703.l8MH32m7011754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-22 13:03 EST ------- Have you filled in the CLA? Also, what is your fedora account system username? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 17:15:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221715.l8MHFaLb013376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 13:15 EST ------- Please change the category to ------------------------------------------------- Categories=System; ------------------------------------------------- i.e. Each category must end with semicolon (although when installed with desktop-file-install, desktop-file-install automatically fixes it and adds semicolon at last). ------------------------------------------------- This package (qpxtool) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 17:36:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221736.l8MHaAVu015794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2007-09-22 13:36 EST ------- ok fixed in 0.6.1-5, thx for the review. -- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qpxtool Short Description: CD/DVD Quality check tool Owners: drago01 Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 17:34:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221734.l8MHYQbk015192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 13:34 EST ------- - License guideline has been updated -- license field now needs to be GPLv2+ - Please separate changelog entries with blank lines - Would be nice to have an icon.. I added a blocker on FE-NEEDSPONSOR, hopefully a qualified developer will see this request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 18:00:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210758] Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221800.l8MI0Fh6020109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-fa - Persian dictionaries for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210758 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 14:00 EST ------- Package no longer on the server (why was the name aspell6-fa, anyway?). Should this be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 17:59:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221759.l8MHxksI019627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-22 13:59 EST ------- I have filed a review request for whowatch bug number #301741 whowatch is described as :- Whowatch is an interactive console utility that displays informations about the users currently logged on to the machine, in real time. Besides standard information (login, tty, host, user's process) you can see type of login (ie. ssh, telnet). You can also see selected user's processes tree or all system processes tree. In the process tree mode there is ability to send INT or KILL signal to selected process. Although 1.6 is released it has a upstream bug which is yet to be fixed. Hence filed review request for whowatch-1.4-1 spec file available at : [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch.spec] SRPM available at: [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch-1.4-1.fc7.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 18:09:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294001] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221809.l8MI9dpW019594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 18:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294001] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221823.l8MINsDw021301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 14:23 EST ------- * The following BRs are superfluous: boost (pulled in by boost-devel) qt4 (pulled in by qt4-devel) gcc-c++ (in standard build environment) libstdc++ (pulled in by gcc-c++) libstdc++-devel (pulled in by gcc-c++) autoconf (pulled in by automake and libtool) automake (pulled in by libtool) * Separate licenses with 'and' (instead of comma), and add versioning info (so "BSD and GPLv2" -- see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines) It seems that the GPL bit is only because the package links against Qt. According to the Trolltech GPL exception, the terms of the GPL does not apply to linked software that are BSD-licensed: http://trolltech.com/products/qt/gplexception so in this case license can probably be set to only BSD. If you think otherwise, please put a comment above the License field, as specified in the licensing guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 18:50:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 269941] Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709221850.l8MIohhl025707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmyth - MythTV remote access libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=269941 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-4 Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-22 14:50 EST ------- Built in rawhide. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 20:32:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222032.l8MKW5cF004140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-22 16:32 EST ------- Build is done. You can now have a look at it.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 20:36:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222036.l8MKamuT004729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-22 16:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > FESCO, > Am I supposed to look at wikipages for what happened last week's meeting? I > thought its usual way of FESCO to post minutes of meeting on fedora-devel. I > guess If I have not missed any mail I have not seen FESCO meeting minutes got > posted to fedora-devel after 2007-09-06 meeting. How am I supposed to know what > decisions were made in last FESCO meeting? Normally, I send out a summary for the FESCo meetings, unfortunately I've been swamped at work the last 2 week and haven't had a chance to write-up a summary (though the irc logs are available on the wiki). When I get back home tomorrow, I should have some free time to work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 20:41:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222041.l8MKfgGv006188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-09-22 16:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-13.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 21:22:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222122.l8MLMBr1009892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org 2007-09-22 17:22 EST ------- Used cpanspec to create new spec file and RPM SPEC: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std.spec SRPM: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std-v0.0.4-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 21:30:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222130.l8MLU4rc010859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-09-22 17:30 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible * source files match upstream * package builds in mock (F7 x86_64 and devel x86_64) * BuildRequires are proper * no shared libraries are present * owns the directories it creates * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * no headers * no pkgconfig files * no libtool archives * not a GUI app * no scriptlets present Everything seems to be ok. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 21:46:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222146.l8MLksWb013366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 23:03:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222303.l8MN3N7C021812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-22 19:03 EST ------- Thanks for updating this review. I have update the license tag (sorry for forgotten to do it before) I have change the changelog For the icon I use one present I believe by default on the system Icon=/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/esc.png Should I had it as source, and include it in the rpm ?? Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 22 23:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709222313.l8MNDhiY022939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-22 19:13 EST ------- Here are the new spec and srpm SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/SteGUI/SteGUI.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/SteGUI/SteGUI-0.0.1-10.fc6.src.rpm >I added a blocker on FE-NEEDSPONSOR, hopefully a qualified developer will see >this request I have already been sponsored... I believe I do not need this qualification any more... Thanks for helping any way Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 00:15:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230015.l8N0FWMA029939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-22 20:15 EST ------- Yes, cla has been done, username is deebs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 01:03:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230103.l8N13HrW002063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com Summary|Display information about |Review Request: whowatch - |users currently logged on |Display information about |users |users currently logged on | |users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 01:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230130.l8N1UOps005194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 21:30 EST ------- That icon is actually from the 'esc' package -- so if you want to use it, you should probably package it yourself. Probably need permission from the author though. How about this image, from Wikipedia's Steganography article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Inkblot.svg The advantage is that Wiki pictures are free of copyright restrictions so we're safe using that. You don't need to hardcode the path in Exec= and Icon= , so just Exec=SteGUI Icon=foo is enough. Note that the extension for the icon should be left out as well, that way if an icon theme comes along with, say, SVG icons, your desktop file does not need updating (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) One last thing -- for Comment you probably want to say "Hides and extracts information within files" (describes what the program does), and for GenericName, "Steganography tool"? Not that GenericName is really used right now (it might be used by the KDE panel, not sure). Perhaps you could include French translations in the desktop file as well, to match the French translations in the spec file? Apart from that, ready to go. Pity that steghide itself is currently broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 01:40:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230140.l8N1e5bM006740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-22 21:40 EST ------- Do you still need sponsored? (in which case I can't officially review) The tarballs don't match: packaged: 0870155e8b75b99f9954e76fb20f9528 whowatch-1.4.tar.gz upstream: 38ed07ce1d672dea1c53276b55c54b69 ../whowatch-1.4.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 02:22:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 22:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230222.l8N2MIOa010914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 22:22 EST ------- For -13: ------------------------------------------------------ %{__ld} -shared -soname=libcgi-util.so.2 libcgi-util.o -o libcgi-util.so ------------------------------------------------------ - This cannot be accepted as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=170767 Please check: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-August/msg00481.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 03:25:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230325.l8N3PVKE018302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-09-22 23:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-14.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 03:31:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230331.l8N3V0qD018424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-22 23:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > * Still "Requires: pygtk2-libglade" is missing. Would you fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 05:37:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230537.l8N5bwqi032480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-23 01:37 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. fixed Requires:pygtk2-libglade Spec file available at :[http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw.spec] SRPM available at :[http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/straw-0.27-9.fc7.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 05:40:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230540.l8N5e7GB000432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-23 01:40 EST ------- Ah, yes with a username like that knowing your username helps. You have been sponsored. You can file CVS admin requests for creation of the CVS modules for your packages now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 05:47:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230547.l8N5l3mb001159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 01:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Do you still need sponsored? (in which case I can't officially review) I will sponsor Subhodip soon so you can review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 05:51:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302041] New: Review Request: purple-plugin_pack - Plugin Pack for Purple/Pidgin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302041 Summary: Review Request: purple-plugin_pack - Plugin Pack for Purple/Pidgin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/purple-plugin_pack/purple-plugin_pack.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/purple-plugin_pack/purple-plugin_pack-2.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A collection of small plugins for Purple/Pidgin. This SRPM produces two binary RPMs: - purple-plugin_pack -- plugins that do not require a GUI - pidgin-plugin_pack -- plugins that depend on Pidgin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 05:48:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230548.l8N5m2BJ001202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 01:48 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (straw) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 05:54:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240607] Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230554.l8N5s0Uk001887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-guifications - Guifications notification plugin for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240607 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.14-2.fc7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 06:00:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 02:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255461] Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230600.l8N60qN4003172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255461 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-23 02:00 EST ------- *** Bug 302041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 06:00:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 02:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302041] Review Request: purple-plugin_pack - Plugin Pack for Purple/Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230600.l8N60pIC003148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: purple-plugin_pack - Plugin Pack for Purple/Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302041 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-23 02:00 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 255461 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 06:10:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 02:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255461] Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230610.l8N6AE8m004298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255461 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-23 02:10 EST ------- Did not notice this until I submitted my review request. I'll review this instead. Two points: would you consider splitting the package up? upstream has purple-plugin_pack and pidgin-plugin_pack; the former is usable from, e.g Finch (I looked and there is no Finch-only plugin right now) - Missing BR on gtkspell-devel - Chopping off xmms is a good idea, but in your spec nobody owns %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/plugin_pack . Add that as %dir in the main package? Would get annoying once other plugins start putting files there, I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 06:10:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 02:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255461] Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230610.l8N6AiQ1003955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255461 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 06:13:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 02:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230613.l8N6DJNa004212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 02:13 EST ------- For -14: * To keep timestamp, please use "-p" option when using "install" or "cp" commands * From rpmlint: ------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost cgi-util]$ rpmlint *-14*rpm cgi-util.i386: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libcgi-util.so.2.2.1 [tasaka1 at localhost cgi-util]$ rpmlint -I no-ldconfig-symlink no-ldconfig-symlink : The package should not only include the shared library itself, but also the symbolic link which ldconfig would produce. (This is necessary, so that the link gets removed by rpm automatically when the package gets removed, even if for some reason ldconfig would not be run at package postinstall phase.) ------------------------------------------------- In short, symlink "libcgi-util.so.2" is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 08:25:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230825.l8N8PIan016226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 04:25 EST ------- Some remarks and questions * Use "-p" option for "cp" or "install" to keep timestamp ? So FAPIcidfmap.ko and cidfmap.ko, COPYRIGHT* README are instaled in each subpackage? ? Why can each subpackage have "Provides: ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}"? I guess only when all subpackages are installed, they can provide "ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}" for consistency with the state before kkfonts related packages are seperated? * /etc should be %_sysconfdir ? What happens if /usr/bin/fc-cache fails by some reason? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 08:48:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 04:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] New: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/londonlaw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/londonlaw-0.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: London Law is an online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame. The game is unusually asymmetric; one player controls the movements of the criminal Mr. X as he tries to evade the detectives, while another one to five players control five detectives trying to track him down. Mr. X has an advantage in access to transportation routes, and his precise location remains hidden for most of the game. The detectives have only the advantage of superior numbers, so they must work in concert to limit the criminal's options. London Law features an attractive map overlaid on high-resolution satellite imagery. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 09:43:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709230943.l8N9hARH025953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-23 05:43 EST ------- (in reply to comment #17) > > some of the drivers will require a lot > > of changes or a complete rewrite to get accepted (and vmblock probably > > wouldn't get accepted at all and we'd need to rewrite it using fuse). > > So it's not actually something we'd have wanted to ship even if we _hadn't_ > decided not to allow any more kernel module packages. > > The reason we decided not to allow any more kernel module packages is because > this is actually almost always the case. If it's not good enough for upstream, > it's not good enough for us. There are _few_ exceptions, and we've _always_ > coped with those by carrying patches in the kernel package. David, I think that is not a fair assessment. Pushing code to the upstream kernel is known to be a long and arduous process, and is not always related to the quality of the code in question, but more about the way it's written, how it's integrated with other/newer parts of the kernel, and so on. A prime example I'm familiar with was the Marvell SATA driver: a very high quality (based on extensive experience) driver, but written straight on top of the SCSI stuff without using the new libata layer, and as such unpushable upstream. (a moot example too, Marvell is now working with the upstream maintainer to port the driver, but these things take time) I think the things that matter most here are: 1) is the code stable and high-quality (and well QAed) ? 2) is the code actively maintained ? 3) will the code have a large user base ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 10:00:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231000.l8NA0vk8028427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at infradead.org 2007-09-23 06:00 EST ------- I disagree -- I think it _is_ a fair assessment. It's about the quality of the code and the design -- and that really _should_ be about "the way it's written, how it's integrated with other/newer parts of the kernel, and so on." Yes, the bar is high. But with good reason. And the line we tend to take in Fedora is "if it's not good enough for Linus, we want you to make a _very_ good case for why you think it's good enough for us". Remember that we are _not_ just banning all non-upstream code. We've always carried patches with new drivers &c in our kernel RPM, and now that all packages are effectively part of "Extras" where the Great Unwashed can get at them, you have the opportunity to maintain your patch there directly. The only thing that's different, fundamentally, is that before you had to get an explicit agreement from FESCo for a kmod package -- and now you have to get an explicit agreement and commit access from the kernel maintainers instead. And _if_ your code is deemed good enough to ship, then it's a whole lot nicer from a technical point of view, because it's not in a separate package with all the rpm hassle that entails and the requirement for builds to be in lock-step. On a separate but mostly related note -- at the Kernel Summit a couple of weeks ago, we spoke about making it easier to merge code which distributions wanted to ship, and perhaps being slightly less picky about it and more pragmatic. Linus indicated a desire _not_ to see distributions carrying such patches, like the wireless-dev tree that Fedora is currently shipping. The idea is that if distros are going to ship it, we might as well merge it upstream. So merging upstream _may_ get a little easier too. But there are downsides to that approach on Linus' part -- because people may stop trying as soon as code is merged, and the final issues may never get sorted out. We'll see how it works out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 10:24:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231024.l8NAOuDA030996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 hch at lst.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hch at lst.de ------- Additional Comments From hch at lst.de 2007-09-23 06:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > A prime example I'm familiar with was the Marvell SATA driver: a very high > quality (based on extensive experience) driver, Sorry, but either you have no clue or you're a liar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 10:36:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231036.l8NAaWvp000369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From hch at lst.de 2007-09-23 06:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Re: 2) > > Absolutely not. > It's already enough of a battle to get upstream to look at our kernel bugs, and > we aren't that far away from mainline. Adding stuff that is extremely unlikely > to go upstream is counter-productive to that effort. I took a quick look at the filesystem and block driver in the package and they're a complete nightmare. Nothing I would recommend people to use at all, nevermind to package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 10:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 06:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231044.l8NAiWiN001182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2007-09-23 06:44 EST ------- Christoph, this is getting off-topic, but we ship mv_sata 3.6.3 with the SunFire X4500 ("Thumper", 6 88SX controllers, 48 disks). Granted my experience is only with the 88SX chip series, i cannot speak for other products, and we support only enterprise kernels, not the latest and greatest. We ship that driver on the Thumper support CD for very good reasons. We've pushed that driver to its limit in terms of performance for some of our Thumper-based products, using 12 4-disk software RAIDs, with hot-swaps etc... Back when Thumper was designed, the kernel sata_mv driver was not in a usable state yet. It has made much progress since. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 11:35:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 07:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231135.l8NBZC1x008026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-23 07:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moreutils Short Description: Additional unix utilities Owners: deebs Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 11:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 07:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231137.l8NBblan008324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-23 07:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: phpTodo Short Description: PHP todo list manager Owners: deebs Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 11:37:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 07:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231137.l8NBb0qS008267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-23 07:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Time-Duration Short Description: rounded or exact English expression of durations Owners: deebs Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 12:28:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231228.l8NCSvTY014943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-23 08:28 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctapi-cyberjack Updated Name: cyberjack Rename the package to get more clean sub package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 13:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231339.l8NDdrlV023674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-09-23 09:39 EST ------- I have receive a message from buildsys at fedoraproject.org containing the text below. However, I don't know what to do: nothing changed in the ppl package lately. In particular, the minimal version of GMP required did not change. Can someone please explain to me what the problem is? ppl has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On x86_64: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On i386: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl-gprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-gprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-gprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 14:53:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231453.l8NEraau000760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 10:53 EST ------- Rawhide gmp is upgraded to 4.2.2 and then soversion of libgmpxx.so changed. At least you have to rebuild ppl against newest gmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 15:11:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231511.l8NFBDFB003499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bagnara at cs.unipr.it 2007-09-23 11:11 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru. It turned out to be a bug in gmp.spec: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 15:31:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231531.l8NFV2hS006066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 11:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #76) > Thanks Mamoru. It turned out to be a bug in gmp.spec: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302221 > No, after bug 302221 is solved, you have to rebuild ppl against newest gmp. As broken deps check says, currently ppl requires libgmpxx.so.3, but current rawhide gmp provides libgmpxx.so.4, not .3. The bug you quoted is saying that libgmpxx.so is linked against libgmpxx.so.3, which does not exist and the link should be targeted against libgmpxx.so.4. So after the bug you quoted is fixed, you have to rebuild against the gmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 15:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231539.l8NFdH4t007011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 11:39 EST ------- By the way, if you don't want to wait until bug 302221 is solved, you can * create a temporary directory (say named as foo) * and create a symlink in the directory named libgmpxx.so which links to %_libdir/libgmpxx.so.4 * and add the directory (foo) to LDFLAGS by some way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 17:46:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231746.l8NHk9Cn025378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 17:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231751.l8NHpkio026081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-23 13:51 EST ------- I have included your comments in the next version: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/qfits-6.2.0-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 17:58:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] New: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-CSS.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-CSS-1.07-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module can be used, along with a CSS::Parse::* module, to parse CSS data and represent it as a tree of objects. Using a CSS::Adaptor::* module, the CSS data tree can then be transformed into other formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:00:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-HTML-WikiConverter.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.61-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: HTML::WikiConverter is an HTML to wiki converter. It can convert HTML source into a variety of wiki markups, called wiki "dialects". Support for various dialects are available in perl-HTML-WikiConverter-* packages. For html2wiki subpackage: A command line tool to convert pages in HTML to Wiki markup. Various wiki dialects are supported. Support for various dialects are available in perl-HTML-WikiConverter-* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:02:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231802.l8NI24T0026890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:04:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302291] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MoinMoin - Convert HTML to MoinMoin markup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302291 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MoinMoin - Convert HTML to MoinMoin markup Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MoinMoin.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MoinMoin-0.53-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module contains rules for converting HTML into MoinMoin markup. See perl-HTML-WikiConverter for additional usage details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302281] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MediaWiki - Convert HTML to MediaWiki markup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302281 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MediaWiki - Convert HTML to MediaWiki markup Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MediaWiki.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MediaWiki-0.55-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This module contains rules for converting HTML into MediaWiki markup. See perl-HTML-WikiConverter for additional usage details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:02:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231802.l8NI297H026925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-23 14:02 EST ------- Apart from the tarball mismatch (please use upstream's), the licensing is also problematic. The source files do not have any license header, so the only license information we have is from the COPYING file. The license should thus be GPLv2 for now, and you might want to ask upstream before adding the '+'. The summary field has a typo: remove the last 'users'? The build root is valid, but it's the least preferred: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 Consider switching to the first. Also, the changelog entry is a bit weird -- first changelog should probably say "Initial package" or something similar. If spec is modified from an earlier package, cite which one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:25:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231825.l8NIPxvN030178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2007-09-23 14:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-15.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 18:54:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231854.l8NIs3ZB001130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-23 14:54 EST ------- I would like to review this as I need it for freecol which I'm packaging. Can you please provide a new srpm based on the latest jpackage srpm for me to review? Alternatively we could do things the other way I around, that I create the package and you review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 19:04:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231904.l8NJ4nxW002986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-23 15:04 EST ------- - iconv'ing should be moved from %install to %prep for --short-circuit build sanity. - BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple) missing. - Including examples/ in %doc would look like a good idea. - License: Artistic clarified: I don't think that's the case. The package's README says "License: Perl Artistic License" and AFAIK that's not the clarified one, it's the original which is not OK in Fedora. If that's correct, it's a blocker. Ask upstream to move to Artistic 2.0 or the clarified one? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 19:05:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709231905.l8NJ5iYB002989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 19:56:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] New: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/higlayout.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/higlayout-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 20:26:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] New: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freecol.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/freecol-0.7.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: FreeCol is a turn-based, multi-player, X based strategy game. FreeCol is generally comparable to, and has compatible rules with, the Colonization(R) game by Microprose(R). --- Notice freecol requires the following 2 packages which are still under review: wstx: review bug 227121 higlayout: review bug 302351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 20:46:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709232046.l8NKkNhu016592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-23 16:46 EST ------- > - iconv'ing should be moved from %install to %prep for --short-circuit build sanity. Fixed > - BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple) missing. Fixed. > - Including examples/ in %doc would look like a good idea. Fixed. > Ask upstream to move to Artistic 2.0 or the clarified one? Done, wait and hope :-) SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-CSS.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-CSS-1.07-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 22:47:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709232247.l8NMlCve032027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ed at eh3.com ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2007-09-23 18:47 EST ------- Hi Benjamin, The people.redhat.com URL in #23 returns a 404 for me. So I grabbed the latest boost SRPM from devel and I'd like to (please!) request that you replace the line: (cd tools/jam/src && ./build.sh) with (cd tools/jam/src && CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./build.sh cc ) and then please consider shipping the bjam executable either as a part of boost-devel or perhaps as a boost-bjam sub-package. I'll gladly submit a patch if that helps. thanks! Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 23 23:24:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255461] Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709232324.l8NNOS1U005559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-plugin_pack - A set of plugins for pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255461 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-09-23 19:24 EST ------- I have a small sugegstion: could please add a few more details about what plugins are included and/or what are they good for ? Or at least include the "Plugins in the Plugin Pack" list taken from the pluginpack wiki page as a separate file and reference this file in %Description. I am a heavy gaim/pidgin user and even after looking at the spec of this package, I would have no idea why would I want to install these plugins. Having to go to the sourceURL to look for details is .. hum.. not practical. In other words, I would appreciate if "yum info" would be more informative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 00:01:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240001.l8O01iYd011216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-23 20:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * Use "-p" option for "cp" or "install" to keep timestamp Not sure what you mean here: I don't see any cp usage currently in .spec. > ? So FAPIcidfmap.ko and cidfmap.ko, COPYRIGHT* README are instaled > in each subpackage? Currently, yes. Installing the CID fmap files in each package is not ideal, but I can't see a better way without introducing some messy scripts say and it should not have any particular adverse affects I think. The %doc files are all small so I don't see a big problem with duplicating them in each subpackage. > ? Why can each subpackage have "Provides: ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}"? > I guess only when all subpackages are installed, they can provide > "ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}" for consistency with the state before > kkfonts related packages are seperated? Ok, let me remove the Provides. > * /etc should be %_sysconfdir ah yes, thanks > ? What happens if /usr/bin/fc-cache fails by some reason? Shrug, I am just using the standard Font scriptlets, but if you want I can protect the fc-cache invocations in %post and %postun. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:24:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240124.l8O1OOTR021924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 21:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * Use "-p" option for "cp" or "install" to keep timestamp > > Not sure what you mean here: I don't see any cp usage currently in .spec. * For example, -------------------------------------------------------- install -m 0644 ttf/$i.ttf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ttfontdir}-$i -------------------------------------------------------- Here "install -m 0644" should be "install -p -m 0644". > > > ? So FAPIcidfmap.ko and cidfmap.ko, COPYRIGHT* README are instaled > > in each subpackage? > > Currently, yes. Installing the CID fmap files in each package is not ideal, > but I can't see a better way without introducing some messy scripts say > and it should not have any particular adverse affects I think. * I think you should - introduce a base package (say: "baekmuk-ttf-fonts-base"), - and have CIP fmap, copying file and other files owned by -base package - and have other subpackages require -base package. > > ? Why can each subpackage have "Provides: ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}"? > > I guess only when all subpackages are installed, they can provide > > "ttfonts-ko = %{ttfontverhead}" for consistency with the state before > > kkfonts related packages are seperated? > > Ok, let me remove the Provides. ? This means you will write "Provides: ttfonts-ko = " in original fonts-korean package (and make fonts-korean require all baekmuk fonts subpackages)? > Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec ? By the way the URL above is not accessible from me. Instead http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:25:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240125.l8O1PJZ7022998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 21:25 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240126.l8O1QO7a022561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 21:26 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] New: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Free Korean bitmap fonts This package is being split out of fonts-korean like baekmuk-ttf-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:33:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240133.l8O1X6Tt023982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |302451 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:33:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240133.l8O1X5Rt023953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-23 21:33 EST ------- (baekmuk-ttf-fonts review is bug 300651.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 01:37:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240137.l8O1b4uW024705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-23 21:37 EST ------- BuildRequires: perl(CSS) failed in mock build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 02:00:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240200.l8O20m2F027220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-23 22:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Here "install -m 0644" should be "install -p -m 0644". Ok, thanks - fixing. :) > - introduce a base package (say: "baekmuk-ttf-fonts-base"), > - and have CIP fmap, copying file and other files owned by -base > package > - and have other subpackages require -base package. Ok, thanks for that - good idea. I called it -common for now. > > Ok, let me remove the Provides. > ? This means you will write "Provides: ttfonts-ko = " in > original fonts-korean package (and make fonts-korean require > all baekmuk fonts subpackages)? fonts-korean will require all the baekmuk packages for the time being yes (certainly for F8). I am kind of tempted to just drop the ttfonts-ko provides though, since we don't really want to provide it forever, but if necessary we could still provide it I suppose. > > Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/petersen/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec > ? By the way the URL above is not accessible from me. Instead > http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec > works. Ugh, sorry about that: thought I was editing the fixed url. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-4.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 02:51:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240251.l8O2pY2O001269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 22:51 EST ------- Well, * Still CID fmap is owned by every subpackage. ? By the way, how do we treat the ownership of %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d ? - On my system, currently the following packages owns %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d ------------------------------------------------------------- ghostscript-8.60-2.fc8 fonts-korean-2.2-4.fc8 fonts-japanese-0.20061016-11.fc8 ------------------------------------------------------------- - Now as fonts-korean will require baekmuk fonts subpackages, baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common should own the directory? - IMO, in the future the ownership of the directory (%_datadir/ghostscript/fonts.d) should be moved to filesystem as well as %_datadir/ghostscript? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:00:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240300.l8O30IAN002952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 23:00 EST ------- One more thing * Please update the contents of CID fmap files. Currently They referes to /usr/share/fonts/korean/TrueType/batang.ttf or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:24:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301231] Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240324.l8O3OrOJ005407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301231 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:21:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240321.l8O3Lc5Y005627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-23 23:21 EST ------- One more thing ? Maybe it is better that -common package is marked as in conflict with "fonts-korean < 2.2-5" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:27:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240327.l8O3R7Am006040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-23 23:27 EST ------- is this package(mcp-plugins) before part of any repository? I saw this is initial submission to fedora and you used Epoch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240332.l8O3W8B7006636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 loganjerry at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:45:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301251] Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240345.l8O3jEKG008687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:45:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301261] Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240345.l8O3jQgj008721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301261 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:48:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301231] Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240348.l8O3mf91008633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301231 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-23 23:48 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 6be67349d51191435ba8b5b124440f01 FIL-plugins-0.1.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-fil-plugins-0.1.0-2.fc8 -> Provides: fil-plugins = 0.1.0-2.fc8 filters.so Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:49:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301251] Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240349.l8O3n4pY008673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-23 23:49 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. bca920c2cbf5e33989e7cafab6fbaee4 REV-plugins-0.3.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-rev-plugins-0.3.1-3.fc8 -> Provides: g2reverb.so rev-plugins = 0.3.1-3.fc8 Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 03:49:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301261] Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240349.l8O3njOS008722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301261 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-23 23:49 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 6fdf4a7e3c716abbb89721645427cd52 VCO-plugins-0.3.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-vco-plugins-0.3.0-5.fc8 -> Provides: blvco.so vco-plugins = 0.3.0-5.fc8 vco_sawpulse.so Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:03:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240403.l8O43j2i010815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 00:03 EST ------- Thanks, Tasaka-san for all your good comments. :) (In reply to comment #9) > * Still CID fmap is owned by every subpackage. Oops, fixing > ? By the way, how do we treat the ownership of > %_datadir/ghostscript/conf.d ? > - Now as fonts-korean will require baekmuk fonts subpackages, > baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common should own the directory? Agreed. We don't want to require ghostscript. > - IMO, in the future the ownership of the directory > (%_datadir/ghostscript/fonts.d) should be moved to > filesystem as well as %_datadir/ghostscript? Yes, that would probably be good, though then %_datadir/ghostscript would have to be there too I guess. > * Please update the contents of CID fmap files. > Currently They refer to /usr/share/fonts/korean/TrueType/batang.ttf ... Thanks for catching that - I had forgotten about it. > One more thing > ? Maybe it is better that -common package is marked as in conflict > with "fonts-korean < 2.2-5" ? Ok, thanks added that too. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/baekmuk-ttf/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-5.fc7.src.rpm [28MB] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:09:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240409.l8O495FQ011331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240409.l8O49s8t011591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-24 00:09 EST ------- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: odt2txt Short Description: Converts an OpenDocument to plain text Owners: salimma Branches: F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:14:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240414.l8O4EcA6012032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 00:14 EST ------- > - IMO, in the future the ownership of the directory > (%_datadir/ghostscript/fonts.d) should be moved to > filesystem as well as %_datadir/ghostscript? I filed bug 302521 for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:27:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240427.l8O4Rons014086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 00:27 EST ------- Can you also submit perl-CSS package as I can see only perl-CSS-Tiny is present in Fedora? you can find it at http://search.cpan.org/~iamcal/CSS-1.07/CSS.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:37:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302281] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MediaWiki - Convert HTML to MediaWiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240437.l8O4bBbi015375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MediaWiki - Convert HTML to MediaWiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302281 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |302271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302291] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MoinMoin - Convert HTML to MoinMoin markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240438.l8O4cRIJ015506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-MoinMoin - Convert HTML to MoinMoin markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302291 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |302271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:37:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240437.l8O4bC3h015400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |302281 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 04:38:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240438.l8O4cREu015482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |302291 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 05:09:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240509.l8O59toN019722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 01:09 EST ------- you missed to install /usr/share/applications/fedora-FBReader.desktop instead to said to install /usr/share/applications/FBReader.desktop Remember while using vendor tag installed desktop file always gets prefixed with vendor tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 05:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240521.l8O5LQmM021505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 01:21 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (baekmuk-ttk-fonts) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- Note: tarball in -5 srpm seems broken (tarball in -4 srpm is okay) Question: Maybe it is better COPYRIGHT.ks is converted to UTF-8 (I don't know with what encoding this file is encoded) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 05:26:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240526.l8O5QR5c022210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 01:26 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=203721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=203721&action=view) modifed spec patch to solve rpmlint messages Use this patch to solve issues raised in comment #17 You may also like to see issues raised in comment #19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 05:35:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240535.l8O5Zq1p023567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 01:35 EST ------- mtasaka, Thanks for your quick review here. I have request to you. Sorry to ask here. But I can't see you on IRC. Can you also please review following Japanese font packages please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:09:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240609.l8O69oVi027497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 02:09 EST ------- Thanks for the quick thorough review. :) (In reply to comment #14) > Note: tarball in -5 srpm seems broken (tarball in -4 srpm is okay) Sorry, I think it is because I went over my quota on fedorapeople. :-/ Just to confirm the correct source file is: a6f4349179cbe3557641782cefba4d70 baekmuk-ttf-2.2.tar.gz It is a bit worrying though if rpm doesn't know that the srpm is incomplete... > Maybe it is better COPYRIGHT.ks is converted to UTF-8 > (I don't know with what encoding this file is encoded) Thanks, I will convert it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:15:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240615.l8O6FHN5029049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |302271 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:15:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240615.l8O6FF9A029018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |302261 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-24 02:15 EST ------- > Can you also submit perl-CSS package as I can see only perl-CSS-Tiny is present > in Fedora? Sorry, forgot to add bugs depends, please #302261 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:13:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240613.l8O6Ds38028254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 02:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: baekmuk-ttf-fonts Short Description: Korean TrueType fonts Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:20:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240620.l8O6Ke12029843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 02:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > mtasaka, > Thanks for your quick review here. I have request to you. Sorry to ask here. > But I can't see you on IRC. Can you also please review following Japanese font > packages please? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 Well, I first try bug 302451 (IMO this can be accepted soon), then try them By the way, until what time are you checking review requests comments? (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Note: tarball in -5 srpm seems broken (tarball in -4 srpm is okay) > Just to confirm the correct source file is: > a6f4349179cbe3557641782cefba4d70 baekmuk-ttf-2.2.tar.gz This tarball is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:31:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240631.l8O6VnYB031213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 02:31 EST ------- * Similar with bug 300651, COPYRIGHT.ks can be converted to UTF-8. * Well, while this package uses relative symlink on %_sysconfdir/X11/fontpath.d, bug 300651 uses absolute symlink. Would you unify them? (for these symlinks, all other packages seem to use absolute symlinks) * %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) files "fonts.cache-1" "encodings.dir" are no longer needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:31:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240631.l8O6VXbs030788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-24 02:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) >The package's > README says "License: Perl Artistic License" and AFAIK that's not the clarified > one, it's the original which is not OK in Fedora. Ville, this package is noarch and therefore doesn't link against anything GPL'ed. => There is no license violation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:39:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240639.l8O6dpJj032081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 02:39 EST ------- will take this for review now and once perl-CSS finishes its review will do official review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:37:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240637.l8O6bM1r031571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 02:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #15) > > mtasaka, > > Thanks for your quick review here. I have request to you. Sorry to ask here. > > But I can't see you on IRC. Can you also please review following Japanese font > > packages please? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 > > Well, I first try bug 302451 (IMO this can be accepted soon), > then try them Sure. Please. > By the way, until what time are you checking review requests comments? > If I understood you correctly I am working in IST timezone 9.30 am to 6.30 pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:49:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240649.l8O6nQca000866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 02:49 EST ------- cvsadmin done (except owner-sync-pkgdb, which is failing currently) imported package to cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:50:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240650.l8O6oTj9001275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 02:50 EST ------- I already asked same license name to spot in PM and he told me for CPAN modules its allowed to use "GPL+ or Artistic." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:55:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240655.l8O6tr4h002080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 02:55 EST ------- Yes, it has been part of CCRMA for quite a while (as is clearly indicated in the changelog). All my current audio tools work mainly consists of making CCRMA package meet the guidelines and submitting them, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/AudioCreation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 06:56:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240656.l8O6uein002253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 02:56 EST ------- p.s. Many thanks for all the ladspa reviews, you rock! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:00:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301231] Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240700.l8O70uoN003147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301231 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 03:00 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-fil-plugins Short Description: LADSPA Filter plugins Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301261] Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240705.l8O75BgD003790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301261 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 03:05 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-vco-plugins Short Description: Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:00:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240700.l8O70wJF003180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 03:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 47a4edef1d6062803c35de7dd81ebbd6 MCP-plugins-0.3.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge ladspa-mcp-plugins-0.3.0-4.fc8 -> Provides: cs_chorus.so cs_phaser.so mcp-plugins = 0.3.0-4.fc8 mvchpf24.so mvclpf24.so Requires: ladspa libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. >> Many thanks for all the ladspa reviews, you rock! You welcome :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:03:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240703.l8O73W6g003168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-24 03:03 EST ------- I have made the changes that you advised me, the only one that I did not do is the translation of the desktop file in french, I never did it. How should I do it ? Comment(fr)= ?? GenericName(fr)= ?? You can find the last Desktop file here : http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/SteGUI/SteGUI.desktop Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:01:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301251] Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240701.l8O71MJ9003010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301251 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 03:01 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-rev-plugins Short Description: A reverberation plugin for LADSPA Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:09:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240709.l8O79Pqq004173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 03:09 EST ------- ? - fonts-japanese spec file contains fonts.cache-1 and encodings.dir. Are these ghost files no longer needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240708.l8O78FPI003996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 03:08 EST ------- * Also, Similar with bug 300651, "Conflicts: fonts-korean <= " is better IMO ... By the way koji seems down -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:13:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240713.l8O7Di9Q004653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-24 03:13 EST ------- *there is bug in process.c , function( synchronise)line no 77 of upstream tarball, in order to remove that i extracted the tarball,edited the file and repacked it. *fixed changelog entry.Intial spec file from dag wieers [http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/whowatch/] *fixed summary field *fixed license issue Specfile available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch.spec] SRPM available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch-1.4-2.fc7.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:19:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240719.l8O7J1Wf005552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 03:19 EST ------- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/lohit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/lohit-fonts-2.1.5-3.fc7.src.rpm please review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:29:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240729.l8O7TLoN006908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 03:29 EST ------- > * Similar with bug 300651, COPYRIGHT.ks can be converted to UTF-8. Yes, thanks. > * Well, while this package uses relative symlink on > %_sysconfdir/X11/fontpath.d, bug 300651 uses absolute symlink. > Would you unify them? (for these symlinks, all other packages > seem to use absolute symlinks) Actually now I made it relative in baekmuk-ttf-fonts now too, but if it is a bad idea I can revert. > * %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) files > "fonts.cache-1" "encodings.dir" are no longer needed? Yes, I think they can go. (In reply to comment #3) > Similar with bug 300651, "Conflicts: fonts-korean <= " is better Hmm, maybe it makes sense, though I think this is no actual conflict of files. > ... By the way koji seems down Seems to be mostly back now, I think. :) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/reviews/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/reviews/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:36:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240736.l8O7atEe008232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 03:36 EST ------- * First please use %setup when extracting source. * And similar with bug 266261 , are ghost files (fonts.cache-1 and encodings.dir) no longer needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:44:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240744.l8O7ickR009206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-09-24 03:44 EST ------- Subhodip, please do not modify the original tarball. Include your patch in the src.rpm (using PatchN) and use it to patch the flawed file using %patchNN (in %prep). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:47:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240747.l8O7lPHn009877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 03:47 EST ------- Here is the review: Good: + rpmlint clean + package is named after upstream project name + meets packaging guidelines + license is gpl and included + spec files is clearly written + source is pristine bb9497ee772062b97ff00a1a68b17c98 fonts-indic-2.1.5.tar.gz + noarch package builds correctly + owns all dirs except /usr/share/fonts (owned by fontconfig) + macro usage is consistent All must items are satisfied afaict. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 07:54:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240754.l8O7sEvr010663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-24 03:54 EST ------- Yes for this package at least, because those ghost are still required for fonts-japanese to ensure removing all the files and the directories cleanly when the package is removed so that it was generated outside the package. and this package uses the different install dir and no longer created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:01:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240801.l8O81NNP011824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 04:01 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladspa-mcp-plugins Short Description: A set of audio plugins for LADSPA Owners: jwrdegoede nando Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:06:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240806.l8O86wlV013185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:06 EST ------- No, it isn't needed anymore, I meant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:08:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240808.l8O88Mr3013289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:08 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing. (In reply to comment #1) > * First please use %setup when extracting source. Updated. Spec File: http://tagoh.fedoraproject.org/jisksp16-1990-fonts/jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec SRPM File: http://tagoh.fedoraproject.org/jisksp16-1990-fonts/jisksp16-1990-fonts-0.983-2.fc8.src.rpm > * And similar with bug 266261 , are ghost files > (fonts.cache-1 and encodings.dir) no longer needed? No, it isn't needed anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:09:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240809.l8O89aDK013563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:09 EST ------- doh, s/project/people/ ;) Spec File: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/jisksp16-1990-fonts/jisksp16-1990-fonts.spec SRPM File: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/jisksp16-1990-fonts/jisksp16-1990-fonts-0.983-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:06:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240806.l8O86xpr013448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 04:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > * Well, while this package uses relative symlink on > > %_sysconfdir/X11/fontpath.d, bug 300651 uses absolute symlink. > > Would you unify them? (for these symlinks, all other packages > > seem to use absolute symlinks) > > Actually now I made it relative in baekmuk-ttf-fonts now too, but if > it is a bad idea I can revert. - I don't know which is better (although I prefer relative). > > > * %ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) files > > "fonts.cache-1" "encodings.dir" are no longer needed? > > Yes, I think they can go. Thanks. > > (In reply to comment #3) > > Similar with bug 300651, "Conflicts: fonts-korean <= " is better > > Hmm, maybe it makes sense, though I think this is no actual conflict > of files. - Yes, there is no actual conflict, however baekmuk-bdf and old fonts-korean rpms owns same files and marking conflicts is better (IMO) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:21:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240821.l8O8LCh2015395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 04:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-fonts Short Description: Lohit TrueType fonts for Indic languages Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:22:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240822.l8O8M7pR015289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 04:22 EST ------- Then okay for this package. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (knm_new-fonts) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:29:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240829.l8O8TDb3016143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:29 EST ------- > - Yes, there is no actual conflict, however baekmuk-bdf and old > fonts-korean rpms owns same files and marking conflicts is better > (IMO) Ok, thanks, added. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/reviews/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/reviews/baekmuk-bdf/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240829.l8O8Tpsb016370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 04:29 EST ------- Jens, Thanks for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:31:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 300651] Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240831.l8O8VB5P016698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:31 EST ------- baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-6.fc8 built in koji now :) Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:31:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240831.l8O8VEPk016781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 Bug 302451 depends on bug 300651, which changed state. Bug 300651 Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-ttf-fonts - Korean truetype fonts (from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:34:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240834.l8O8Y3m2017063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 04:34 EST ------- Okay. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (jiskp16-1990-fonts) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:36:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240836.l8O8aZ0x017715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 04:36 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (baekmuk-bdf-fonts) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240844.l8O8ipTZ018792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 04:44 EST ------- Thanks for quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:45:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240845.l8O8j4AE019159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 04:45 EST ------- Thanks for quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240844.l8O8ijPv018760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 04:44 EST ------- Thanks for quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:46:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240846.l8O8kp5L019443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:46 EST ------- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: baekmuk-bdf-fonts Short Description: Korean bitmap fonts Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: petersen Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 08:58:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240858.l8O8wPk4020904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 04:58 EST ------- Ok, thanks, that is all ok. Sorry to keep you waiting so long. Below is my review. Good: + rpmlint is ok wqy-unibit-fonts.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /etc/X11/fontpath.d/wqy-unibit-fonts /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi/wqy-unibit (this can be waived or you can make it relative by prepending "../.." if you wish. + naming is based on upstream name + meets packaging guidelines + license is gplv2 and included + spec file is clear + source is pristine 751dacd1326cd49b44486b45c592cfa6 wqy-unibit-bdf-1.1.0-1.tar.gz + noarch package builds correctly + buildreqs listed + filelist ok Except the following, all must items are satisfied AFAICS. Needs attention: - both wqy-bitmap-fonts and this package own /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi Personally I don't feel it is a blocker, but it is against the packaging guidelines: you should probably consider just using /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi-unibit for this package and similarly for the other package. - Do you think there will be a wqy-unibit-ttf say one day? (just worrying if the name were to be too general) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:10:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240910.l8O9A3bF022943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 05:10 EST ------- cvsadmin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:28:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240928.l8O9SxHj025441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 05:28 EST ------- cvsadmin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:39:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240939.l8O9dmkv027287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 05:39 EST ------- You want to ignore all rpmlint output cdcollect.i386: W: invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", "Affero GPL", "AFL", "ARL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "Giftware", "Glide", "gnuplot", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv3", "GPLv3+", "IBM", "IJG", "ImageMagick", "iMatix", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OpenPBS", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 1.1", "OSL 1.1+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SLIB", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "ZPLv2.1", "ZPLv2.1+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "IEEE", "OFSFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "Utopia", "XANO", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". cdcollect.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. cdcollect.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Also, you desktop file command should be desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \ --remove-category="Application" \ --delete-original \ --dir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:45:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240945.l8O9jvwa028054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 05:45 EST ------- Now bug 302221 is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:51:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240951.l8O9p0vD028790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-24 05:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: straw Short Description: Desktop news aggregator Owners: subhodip Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:54:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240954.l8O9sG8m029254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-24 05:54 EST ------- Of course, right now I'm just busy with other work but will handle the issues ASAP, promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:55:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240955.l8O9tHvR029780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 05:55 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM gave me seekwatcher.src: W: no-%build-section The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to provide additional "under the hood" functionality, such as injection of automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty. Where can I find mencoder? package installation failed with error: Failed dependencies: mencoder is needed by seekwatcher-0.7-1.fc8.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 09:52:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709240952.l8O9qm1Q029013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 440volt.tux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 10:06:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241006.l8OA679T031180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-24 06:06 EST ------- just *bing* :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 10:12:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241012.l8OACEvt032069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 06:12 EST ------- Just confirmed on #fedora-devel and this package cannot make into Fedora because of missing package dependency mencoder. If by any chance you can use any alternate to mencoder then we can think this for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 10:59:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241059.l8OAxLV0006214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(debarshi.ray at gmail | |.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 11:39:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 264641] Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241139.l8OBdMRL012339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconfig - simple library for manipulating structured configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264641 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 07:39 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 12:01:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241201.l8OC18qF015537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 08:01 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (qfits) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 12:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302451] Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241244.l8OCiJew022691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baekmuk-bdf-fonts - Korean bitmap fonts (separated from fonts-korean) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302451 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 08:44 EST ------- Package has been imported and built. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 12:40:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241240.l8OCesoM022522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 08:40 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (cgi-utils) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 12:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225849] Merge Review: gnuplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241244.l8OCiW3R023042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnuplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225849 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-09-24 08:44 EST ------- Thanks. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 12:51:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241251.l8OCp3to023979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-24 08:51 EST ------- Jens, can you point me to the link where says this directory arrangement is prohibited (or not preferred)? I thought I read the guideline very carefully. my thought was to use a two-level directory structure to provide a better separation of this font to other fonts in the system, so that the users can easily manage wenquanyi fonts on their system (I thought /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/... is similar). yes, there will be a truetype equivalence for unibit, my plan was to name it as wqy-univec-ttf, this font will probably be released in a couple of months. there is another fonts, wqy-zenhei-ttf is now in public testing http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=128192&package_id=242056 I will soon pack it up for Fedora. indeed, the directory structure you proposed is ok with me, if you and the guideline consider it as a better structure, I will change both packages to follow this. let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 12:57:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241257.l8OCv4nM025105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-24 08:57 EST ------- No, I want to ignore only the 2. and 3. AFAIK the package conforms with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono. updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect.spec updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect-0.6.0-2.src.rpm changes - updated the license tag - fixed desktop file installation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:08:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241308.l8OD8Ffv026845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 09:08 EST ------- Thanks for the review; I'll add a %build. Sorry about mencoder, that was a thinko on my part. seekwatcher can still make still graphs, just not movies. So I think we can get it in with limited functionality. I'll see about patching it up to remove the option, or something along those lines. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241306.l8OD6phN026703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-09-24 09:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > > * unstripped ELF binaries > > > - Still lots of ELF binaries are not stripped. > > > > How is this supposed to be handled? > - I wrote the method in my comment 10 (and also in my comment 4). > You have to change the permission of those ELF binaries to 0755 > before %install section finishes. I manually set all ELF objects executable at the end of the %install, and objects are still not stripped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:16:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250040] Review Request: new - A simple template system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241316.l8ODGrFY028261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:16 EST ------- Michael, how do you think we should treat this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:18:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241318.l8ODIgqk028391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:18 EST ------- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:19:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241319.l8ODJH0x028457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library Alias: openjpeg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(seg at haxxed.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:19 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:19:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225241] Merge Review: alsa-lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241319.l8ODJOoN028503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225241 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-24 09:19 EST ------- Great, thanks! I've taken the liberty to commit a last (very minor) change to remove tabs and spaces on end of lines and the dot from the summary, which obviously don't justify a rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:20:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234326] Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241320.l8ODKKFa028946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bandsaw - A syslog monitoring program for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234326 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(splinux25 at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:20 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241321.l8ODLmEF029101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-09-24 09:21 EST ------- Eric how about either trying to build a modular version and submit the mencoder dependent part to rpmfusion or maybe submit the whole package to rpmfusion ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241324.l8ODOpn7029443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kms at passback.co.uk | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:24 EST ------- Well, so what should we do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:21:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241321.l8ODLFRX029049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 09:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Jens, can you point me to the link where says this directory arrangement is > prohibited (or not preferred)? I thought I read the guideline very carefully. Well it appears on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: "MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time." > my thought was to use a two-level directory structure to provide a better > separation of this font to other fonts in the system, so that the users can > easily manage wenquanyi fonts on their system (I thought > /usr/share/fonts/zh_CN/TrueType/... is similar). (cjkunifonts is now actually in a separate package for F8 with each font in its own subpackage and subdir.) But anyway fonts-chinese owned both zh_CN/ and zh_CN/TrueType/ and did not share them with any other package in fedora afaik. Perhaps the requirement can be waived for your packages, but I am just pointing out that it does go somewhat against the strict packaging guidelines. > yes, there will be a truetype equivalence for unibit, my plan was to name it > as wqy-univec-ttf, this font will probably be released in a couple of months. Ok, then probably it can be called something like wqy-univec-fonts... > there is another fonts, wqy-zenhei-ttf is now in public testing : > I will soon pack it up for Fedora. Great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:29:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241329.l8ODTuRb030654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lephilousophe at user | |s.sourceforge.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:29 EST ------- Anyway would you update the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:29:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241329.l8ODTKYA030479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-24 09:29 EST ------- Additional cleanups : - Pick either tabs or spaces for identing, but not both. - Why is the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 still needed? The configure script only has a "--disable-largefile" option, so I'd assume it's enabled by default. If it's still needed, a quick comment would be a good thing. - The "/var/lib/alsa" line would be clearer as "%dir /var/lib/alsa/" since nothing below it is included (only asound.state, but it's %ghost'ed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:34:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285591] Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241334.l8ODYkU6031602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lohit-fonts - font package for indic fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285591 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 09:34 EST ------- Thanks Parag for getting the package built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:32:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241332.l8ODWX2H031364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 09:32 EST ------- Xavier, ORBit2 directory ownership issue is not fixed. So would you have this package explitly own the directory in issue and import this package anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:36:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241336.l8ODaeKF032392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-24 09:36 EST ------- fixed the above issue #comment3 Specfile available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch.spec] SRPM available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch-1.4-3.fc7.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:35:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241335.l8ODZTbO032199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es 2007-09-24 09:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qfits Short Description: A stand-alone general purpose FITS library Owners: sergiopr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:48:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241348.l8ODmEvB001477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-24 09:48 EST ------- I see, I think the requirement for not-sharing-ownership is quite reasonable. I will move this package to /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi-unibit and update the spec/srpm by the end of the day. thank you Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:51:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241351.l8ODplvu002166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-24 09:51 EST ------- Your patch is broken: rpmbuild -ba whowatch.spec ... Patch #0 (whowatch-1.4.patch): + patch -p1 -s missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:52:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225634] Merge Review: cadaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241352.l8ODqLoV002204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cadaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225634 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-24 09:52 EST ------- Good catch, the %makinstall, I've often missed it in my own spec files :-/ Everything looks good, except maybe the NLS : Passing --enable-nls doesn't change anything, and configure always reports "Internationalization: Not built". I'm not sure why since a quick look seems to indicate that the messages about having NLS enabled should lead to "Internationalization" being enabled. Anyway, this isn't vital, and not review specific, so feel free to have a look and close the bug, but I'll fedora-review + anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:57:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241357.l8ODvOo3003012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2007-09-24 09:57 EST ------- I gave it a spin on mock and I got this: make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.13/db' SYMLINK include/base -> include/basedbs/base-2.6.21 ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found ../scripts/get_current_distro.sh: line 67: lsb_release: command not found SYMLINK include/distro -> include/distrodbs/distro-UNSUPPORTED Your distro is not supported make: *** [include/distro] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libtune-0.13/db' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4327 (%install) Seems that is is missing as pre-requisite the lsb package too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 13:57:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241357.l8ODvBdF002983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2007-09-24 09:57 EST ------- Now when the patches were merged into new upstream would be nice to have + for review. Is there someone brave? I fixed almost everything what was mentioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 14:11:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241411.l8OEBgah005731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 ------- Additional Comments From stransky at redhat.com 2007-09-24 10:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Additional cleanups : > - Pick either tabs or spaces for identing, but not both. > - Why is the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 still needed? The > configure script only has a "--disable-largefile" option, so I'd assume it's > enabled by default. If it's still needed, a quick comment would be a good thing. Aha. Unfortunately I have 64bit system so it's that always enabled there. I'll try to check it on some i386. > - The "/var/lib/alsa" line would be clearer as "%dir /var/lib/alsa/" since > nothing below it is included (only asound.state, but it's %ghost'ed). Feel free to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 14:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241420.l8OEKDSU007233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-24 10:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Ville, this package is noarch and therefore doesn't link against anything GPL'ed. > => There is no license violation. Linking does not matter in this case because the original Artistic license, which is the license for the source code in this package, is not accepted in Fedora (by itself), no matter what it is linked to or not. (In reply to comment #4) > I already asked same license name to spot in PM and he told me for CPAN modules > its allowed to use "GPL+ or Artistic." That's incorrect. Or more specifically, it's a too broad statement - "GPL+ or Artistic" is what we can use when upstream says "Licensed under the same license as Perl itself", which is very common for CPAN stuff. But in this case, upstream specifically says "Perl Artistic License" (which is not the same thing as "same License as Perl" which would be the "GPL+ or Artistic" case) and doesn't mention GPL at all, we cannot go ahead and claim it's GPL or add GPL to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 14:29:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303141] New: Package for python gdl bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303141 Summary: Package for python gdl bindings Product: Fedora Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas at ahle.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: I'd like to use gdl (the anjuta moveable sidepanels) in a python application. Debian and others have the python bindings in gnome-python-extras, but it doesn't seam to be true for fedora. Would it be possible to include those? The sources are located at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-python-extras/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 14:30:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241430.l8OEUOpG008653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-24 10:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Ville, this package is noarch and therefore doesn't link against anything GPL'ed. > > => There is no license violation. > > Linking does not matter in this case because the original Artistic license, > which is the license for the source code in this package, is not accepted in > Fedora (by itself), no matter what it is linked to or not. Zealotry - Show me which laws and/or licenses, in which country, using a free license such as the Artistic license in a scripted languages breaks? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 14:48:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241448.l8OEmWxs012213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 10:48 EST ------- hmm apparently the beta1 theora release has png2theora in theora-tools... pity F8 doesn't have that release, yet... maybe I can ask for just that to be included in the current package. Chris Mason would be willing to use those free tools rather than the mpg stuff. I'll take a look. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 15:24:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241524.l8OFO7Hf019367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-24 11:24 EST ------- The people who are in charge of the Fedora licensing rules are responsible for defending them for you, not people who act according to them in package reviews. Contact spot and/or the fedora-legal-list if you have issues with the rules. Regarding the actual packaging, 1.07-2.fc7 looks ready to me but I won't personally approve it before the license issue is sorted out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 15:26:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290771] Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241526.l8OFQRTG019986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gsoap - Generator Tools for Coding SOAP/XML Web Services in C and C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290771 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 15:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241555.l8OFtMuC024837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-24 11:55 EST ------- Oups... Should also add : Requires(post): %{__pear} Requires(postun): %{__pear} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 15:51:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241551.l8OFpR8R024062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 15:50:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241550.l8OFoZcN023950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-24 11:50 EST ------- As you're now sponsored, the above review is a FORMAL REVIEW : APPROVED P.S. Should about provides : php-channel(pear.phpdb.org) still apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 15:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225772] Merge Review: frysk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241556.l8OFunvr025500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: frysk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225772 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora cagney at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cagney at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241603.l8OG3bIn026660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-24 12:03 EST ------- REVIEW * no source files * package meets naming and packaging guidelines (no special guideline for channels). * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2). * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F7 - x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint : W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 9) W: php-channel-phpdb no-documentation * final requires php-cli >= 5.1.4 php-pear(PEAR) * final provides see below php-channel(pear.phing.info) = 1.0.0-3.fc8 php-channel-phing = 1.0.0-3.fc8 * %check is not present; no test suite provide. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear channel..) * no documentation I don't think you need to requires php-cli >= 5.1.4, why this ? Should : correct spec (space/tabs) Requires(post): %{__pear} Requires(postun): %{__pear} Provides: php-channel(pear.phing.info) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:10:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241610.l8OGAHDE027465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241614.l8OGEemZ027853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:12:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241612.l8OGCcP1027722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:18:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301571] Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241618.l8OGINDU029112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:16:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 299271] Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241616.l8OGGcWZ029014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nafees-web-naskh-fonts - Nafees Web font for writing Urdu in the Naskh script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299271 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:16 EST ------- Please wait to request CVS until the package has been approved by your reviewer. (ie, they set the fedora-review flag to +) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:21:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241621.l8OGLNxR029243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:23:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241623.l8OGNO6R030144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:28:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241628.l8OGSjjK030885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:33:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241633.l8OGXVRV030879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:33 EST ------- The package description here is confusing to me... perhaps it should be something like: "Simple Video4Linux programs for Linux radio cards" (If you do want to change the description, please just reset fedora-cvs to ? and I will update it). cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:32:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241632.l8OGWhdO030821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-24 12:32 EST ------- The GenericName and Comment fields are swapped. Concrete example: Name=Firefox Web Browser GenericName=Web Browser <= the product name has been removed Comment=Browse the Web So in case of SteGUI, the generic name can be just "Steganography tool" and the comment explains what it does. For desktop file translations, use: Name[fr]= GenericName[fr]= Comment[fr]= Also, you can leave out the extension when specifying the icon file in SteGUI.desktop -- don't hardcode it. Looks good -- upload the final RPM and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:31:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254142] Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241631.l8OGVCPZ030739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenSER - Open Source SIP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254142 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2007-09-24 12:31 EST ------- "which" does not needed to be in buildrequires, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions All documentation files need to be in UTF-8. More updates from changelog: - added reload section to init script this is needed by rpmlint - init script specified with initrddir macro http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros - documentation converted to UTF-8 guidelines: - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - added doc macro for documentation - documentation moved do proper place (/usr/share/doc/NAME-VERSION/) - unixodbc subpackage summary update (word order changed to start with upper case letter) http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/7/openser-1.2.2-9.fc7.src.rpm I see only one thing left. Perl subpackage need to be in perl5/site... directory or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:36:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301231] Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241636.l8OGaCwv032138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301231 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301251] Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241639.l8OGdS8E031736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:37:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241637.l8OGbjDK032311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:40:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301261] Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241640.l8OGeuaB032323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301261 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:43:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241643.l8OGhirR000603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:46:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241646.l8OGkFhn001162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:46 EST ------- Please add a CVS template here so we know what branches you want, etc. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Reset the fedora-cvs flag to ? when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:48:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241648.l8OGmvcA000660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 12:48 EST ------- Upstream is named ctapi-cyberjack isn't it? Or did they rename? Wouldn't renaming it confuse users as it's not the same as upstream? Also, debian and suse at least ship it with this name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:55:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241655.l8OGtu1u001943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-24 12:55 EST ------- It is only an idea, because the PC/SC sub package have an some confuses name. It will be called ctapi-cyberjack-pcsc... I think this can confuse some users, because PC/SC and CT-API are to total different API's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 16:59:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241659.l8OGx9mc002879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2007-09-24 12:59 EST ------- Ooops, sorry, here it is. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli Short Description: This is the MySQL Improved MDB2 driver Owners: trasher Branches: F-7 InitialCC: trasher Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:22:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241722.l8OHMjMB005793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-24 13:22 EST ------- ok. That all makes sense to me... I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Don't forget to close this once it's been imported and built. Also, a nice hosted space or something would be good if you can manage it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:29:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241729.l8OHTQ26006447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-24 13:29 EST ------- Ok I have done the changes on the desktop file. you can find the last version there : SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/SteGUI/SteGUI-0.0.1-11.fc6.src.rpm SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/SteGUI/SteGUI.spec Desktop file http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/SteGUI/SteGUI.desktop Thanks for your help :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241735.l8OHZrlO008100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Ville, this package is noarch and therefore doesn't link against anything GPL'ed. > > => There is no license violation. > > Linking does not matter in this case because the original Artistic license, > which is the license for the source code in this package, is not accepted in > Fedora (by itself), no matter what it is linked to or not. > > (In reply to comment #4) > > I already asked same license name to spot in PM and he told me for CPAN modules > > its allowed to use "GPL+ or Artistic." > > That's incorrect. Or more specifically, it's a too broad statement - "GPL+ or > Artistic" is what we can use when upstream says "Licensed under the same license > as Perl itself", which is very common for CPAN stuff. But in this case, > upstream specifically says "Perl Artistic License" (which is not the same thing > as "same License as Perl" which would be the "GPL+ or Artistic" case) and > doesn't mention GPL at all, we cannot go ahead and claim it's GPL or add GPL to it. Sorry. My misunderstandings. I understood above thing correctly now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:39:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241739.l8OHdSWw007919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:39:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241739.l8OHdCL1007880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-24 13:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: generic-logos Short Description: icons and pictures Owners: notting at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:38:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241738.l8OHcBNI007815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the review; I'll add a %build. ok > > Sorry about mencoder, that was a thinko on my part. seekwatcher can still make > still graphs, just not movies. So I think we can get it in with limited > functionality. I'll see about patching it up to remove the option, or something > along those lines. > Will be happy to review this then :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:40:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241740.l8OHekg5008476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-24 13:40 EST ------- thanks for update. will review it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:43:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241743.l8OHhR0t009815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-24 13:43 EST ------- Thanks tibbs! Updated source package with fixed Source0 line. This is what will be imported to the repository: Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-fedora-0.2.90.18-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:48:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241748.l8OHmsaj009213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-24 13:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-fedora Short Description: Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services Owners: toshio,lmacken,ricky,mmcgrath Branches: FC-6 F-7 EL-5 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 17:55:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241755.l8OHtDBf011803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 13:55 EST ------- Then would you upload a new spec/srpm (and write the URLs)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:01:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301231] Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241801.l8OI1p6t011799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-fil-plugins - LADSPA Filter plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301231 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 14:01 EST ------- Imported and build for devel and F-7, request push as F-7 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:02:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301251] Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241802.l8OI25QS011832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-rev-plugins - A reverberation plugin for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301251 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 14:02 EST ------- Imported and build for devel and F-7, request push as F-7 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:02:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301241] Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241802.l8OI2GPx013049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-mcp-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301241 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 14:02 EST ------- Imported and build for devel and F-7, request push as F-7 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:02:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301261] Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241802.l8OI2WmU013082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ladspa-vco-plugins - Anti-aliased pulse and sawtooth oscillators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301261 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 14:02 EST ------- Imported and build for devel and F-7, request push as F-7 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:09:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241809.l8OI94CZ014040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-24 14:09 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:30:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301571] Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241830.l8OIU1DX017196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengl-games-utils - Utilities to check proper 3d support before launching 3d games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301571 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-24 14:30 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:36:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283461] Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241836.l8OIaRAE018359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpxtool - CD/DVD Quality check tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283461 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:57:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241857.l8OIvk0a020350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgarski at post.pl ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-09-24 14:57 EST ------- This is a duplicate of bug #234331 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 18:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241857.l8OIv9or021650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 mgarski at post.pl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mgarski at post.pl 2007-09-24 14:57 EST ------- http://mgarski.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp-1.0.0-1.fc7.src.rpm http://mgarski.fedorapeople.org/linuxdcpp.spec LinuxDC++ team released 1.0.0 version, so I reopen this bug. FYI: You have rejected to review my package but in bug #278481 review of cvs snapshot is being done. What do we do in such case, where two same packages are being reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 19:05:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303841] New: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303841 Summary: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/libflashsupport.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/libflashsupport-000-0.1.svn20070904.src.rpm Description: Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player Split from pulseaudio package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 19:08:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241908.l8OJ8d6q023407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter Alias: optipng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis| | Alias| |optipng Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-24 15:08 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: optipng New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 19:21:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241921.l8OJL8KV023876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-24 15:21 EST ------- *fixed broken patch Specfile available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch.spec] SRPM available at [http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/whowatch-1.4-4.fc7.src.rpm] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 19:33:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303841] Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241933.l8OJX4Nu027250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303841 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 19:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709241942.l8OJghD6028859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-24 15:42 EST ------- All good! The Name[fr] in desktop is not required if the name is identical, by the way, so you might want to chop it off when committing the spec to CVS. APPROVED MUST ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK ? build dependencies complete: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? desc and summary contain translations if available: OK ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK ? package functioned as described: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 20:03:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242003.l8OK3fMq032185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-24 16:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SteGUI Short Description: SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide Owners: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 20:11:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303841] Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242011.l8OKBllb031956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303841 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-24 16:11 EST ------- MUST Not sure about these two: ? package name: -pulse removed? ? library -> ldconfig: confirmation: not needed? I tried calling ldconfig manually and get the following: /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libflashsupport.so is not a symbolic link but pulseaudio-lib's libflashsupport does this too. Replacing the libflashsupport.so file with the one from the RPM works, so this is probably OK OK: ? rpmlint: src clean, binary missing doc (upstream), contains .so (ok -- does not contain .so.*) ? spec file name: matches package name ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: ? license field accurate: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK (SVN) ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK ? build dependencies complete ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? if license text missing, ask upstream to include it ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK ? package functioned as described: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 20:52:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242052.l8OKqb2W007653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2007-09-24 16:52 EST ------- If it's just the block driver/filesystem modules that are bad, is it possible to include a subset of functionality? For example, "Drag and Drop, Text and File Copy/Paste" and "Time synchronization", "Automatic guest screen resolution resizing"? Looking at http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/faq.php there is a fairly big list of stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 21:02:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242102.l8OL2FBN009164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-24 17:02 EST ------- Imported and built (with typo fix). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 21:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242103.l8OL33Q6009275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From hch at lst.de 2007-09-24 17:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > If it's just the block driver/filesystem modules that are bad, is it possible to > include a subset of functionality? For example, "Drag and Drop, Text and File > Copy/Paste" and "Time synchronization", "Automatic guest screen resolution > resizing"? I don't think either of these features requires a kernel driver. I can't easily spot any routines related to these items at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 21:13:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242113.l8OLDjfV008740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From hch at lst.de 2007-09-24 17:13 EST ------- Looks like the vmblock filesystem-lookalike actually is used to implement cut&paste in some odd way. Not much of a chance there, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 21:32:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303841] Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242132.l8OLWH1t013950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303841 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 21:43:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242143.l8OLh9h0013471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ajackson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajackson at redhat.com 2007-09-24 17:43 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libxcb New Branches: F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 21:46:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242146.l8OLkYNh014202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 17:46 EST ------- Well, spent too much time on this today :) png2theora is already in the libtheora src.rpm we have, just not installed. I have it making a "movie" but something is odd; it looks pretty wrong. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 22:58:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242258.l8OMw1G5023344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-24 18:58 EST ------- APPROVED. The initial changelog entry has no space between '-' and 'Initial packaging', please fix when committing to CVS. MUST ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK ? build dependencies complete: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK ? package functioned as described: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 23:21:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242313] Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242321.l8ONL5iT027824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: phpTodo - PHP todo list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242313 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 23:24:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242324.l8ONOsh9026501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 23:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242310] Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242330.l8ONU2UY027546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moreutils - Additional unix utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242310 Bug 242310 depends on bug 242311, which changed state. Bug 242311 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 24 23:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242311] Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709242330.l8ONU2UK027461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242311 fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-24 19:30 EST ------- Thanks to all for the review and thanks to Hans for the sponsorship. Jeffrey, if you would still like to co-maintain this package let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:25:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] New: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-4.82-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: PySol is a solitaire game with a number of nice features, including hints, autoplay, unlimited undo, player statistics, demo mode, selectable card sets, background graphics and integrated help. It currently supports over one hundred different games & variants, and has a plug-in architecture which makes adding more very easy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:29:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] New: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-cardsets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-cardsets-4.40-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains various cardsets for pysol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:29:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250029.l8P0TofB004583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |304301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:30:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285321] Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250030.l8P0UgG4004993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fmtools - Simple Video for Linux radio card programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285321 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:29:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250029.l8P0Tpih004603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |304311 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:51:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304331] New: Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304331 Summary: Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-sound-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-sound-server-3.01-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A Python extension module that plays WAV samples together with MP3 or MOD background music -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:51:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304341] Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250051.l8P0puMe006127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304341 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |304301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:51:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250051.l8P0pvw1006147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |304341 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:51:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304331] Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250051.l8P0pla7007839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304331 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |304301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:51:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250051.l8P0pl04007860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |304331 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 00:51:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304341] New: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304341 Summary: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-music.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-music-4.40-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the background music for pysol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:15:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301591] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250115.l8P1F0FQ010719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysqli - MySQL Improved MDB2 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301591 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-24 21:14 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:24:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250124.l8P1Oi1r012118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-24 21:24 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:36:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250136.l8P1aTLE011731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-24 21:36 EST ------- CVS done. Note: Owners: should be an FAS ID, not an email address. Fortunately yours is easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:37:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250137.l8P1bklD011823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 adar at vmware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adar at vmware.com ------- Additional Comments From adar at vmware.com 2007-09-24 21:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Looks like the vmblock filesystem-lookalike actually is used to implement > cut&paste in some odd way. Not much of a chance there, sorry. Yeah, it's used to handle both copy/paste and DnD. See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=46E6FDEC.3090700%40codemonkey.ws. Christoph, since we do want to upstream our kernel modules, could you give us an idea of what needs to change? Obviously we have to adapt the modules to the kernel coding style and cut out the older kernel compatibility code, but what else needs to be reimplemented or redesigned? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:41:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250141.l8P1fHfx014533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter Alias: optipng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:37:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250137.l8P1b6hW013970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-24 21:37 EST ------- CVS done. Note: Owners: should be your FAS ID, not your email address. Fortunately I remember what yours is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:40:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250140.l8P1eh2n012460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-24 21:40 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:40:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197732] Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250140.l8P1eas8012429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: optipng - a PNG optimizer and converter Alias: optipng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197732 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-24 21:40 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:41:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246287] Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250141.l8P1fOer012514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libxcb - C language binding to the X11 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246287 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 01:59:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250159.l8P1xgxY016446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From davej at redhat.com 2007-09-24 21:59 EST ------- A better forum for kernel code review is probably the kernel-mentors list, or linux-kernel rather than bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 02:36:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250236.l8P2aJeE020578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 22:36 EST ------- I suggest let's rename it to taipeifonts if that is the upstream name. taipeifonts.src: W: no-url-tag Is there URL for this? taipeifonts.noarch: W: no-documentation taipeifonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag Any documentation files available? intlfonts-1.2.1/Korean.X/README reads: Koean Hangle&Hanja (KSC5601): hanglg16.bdf from X.V11R5/mit/bdf/fonts/misc hanglm16.bdf ... hanglm24.bdf ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 02:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250242.l8P2gpqp023518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipei-fonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-24 22:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=204781) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=204781&action=view) taipeifonts.spec-1.patch cleanup patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 02:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304391] New: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304391 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: downhillgames at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/lindox/pidgin-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/lindox/pidgin-gfire-0.6.1-0.1.20070831svn.fc7.src.rpm Description: this is a plug-in under development which allows Pidgin to connect to the popular xFire network (www.xfire.com). (This is my first package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 02:52:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250252.l8P2qefn023059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: taipei-fonts|Package Review: taipeifonts |(split from fonts-chinese). |(split from fonts-chinese). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 02:51:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225959] Merge Review: kcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250251.l8P2phKZ025045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225959 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-24 22:51 EST ------- Thanks. improved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 04:56:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250456.l8P4ukCd008664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-25 00:56 EST ------- When using cpanspec, you need to look over the generated specfile and specifically the License: tag and fill it in with the appropriate value based on what the license statements you find in the code and documentation. In this case, the documentation seems silent, but the code (CreditCard.pm, near the top) says: # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or # modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. So the License: tag should contain "GPL+ or Artistic". The license tag issue lears to the only rpmlint complaints: perl-Business-CreditCard.noarch: W: invalid-license CHECK perl-Business-CreditCard.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL perl-Business-CreditCard.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic That's the only issue I see, so just fix up the License: tag and I'll approve this package. * source files match upstream: 1a052afd178419057dff025b8ea3ad003ab110bce270359d3af70ad18664e055 Business-CreditCard-0.30.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field is not correct. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Business::CreditCard) = 0.30 perl-Business-CreditCard = 0.30-3.fc8 = perl >= 1:5 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: ok 1 ok 2 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 05:13:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250513.l8P5Dt53008894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 01:13 EST ------- PING This is still not built, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 05:14:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250514.l8P5ERjK010897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 01:14 EST ------- Could you please put in a cvsadmin request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 05:23:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250523.l8P5N7UD012021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-25 01:23 EST ------- The most recent version still doesn't have a build dependency on Test::More, so all the tests fail and the package fails to build. Also, this package has the same issue with the license that perl-Business-CreditCard has. According to the documentation, License: should be "GPL+ or Artistic". Adding the necessary build dependency gets things building, although for complete test suite coverage you should also have build dependencies on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) and perl(Test::Pod). I added the necessary bits so that I could do this review. rpmlint complains about the License: tag, and also perl-Config-Std.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.4-3 v0.0.4-3.fc8 Indeed, this package has ended up with a stray 'v' in the Version which comes from upstream. Frankly I've no idea why upstream would do a thing like that, but we want the Version: tag to be numeric in this case. So you'll need to remove the 'v' from Version: and, so that things still build, add that 'v' back to your Source0: and %setup lines. I know %description comes from the package itself (specifically the Description section of the documentation) but I would urge you to remove the needless semi-profanity. (Not that it offends me, but we're creating a distribution to be used by very many people.) * source files match upstream: 40b455d1971960514a0b87c58a4d1656207e03cd6d7a33dd3c068f97ad3ed5d5 Config-Std-v0.0.4.tar.gz X package version is not compliant with guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description is questionable. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field is incorrect. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper (missing perl(Test::More)). * %clean is present. X package fails to build. * once made to build, the package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Config::Std) perl(Config::Std::Block) perl(Config::Std::Comment) perl(Config::Std::Gap) perl(Config::Std::Hash) perl(Config::Std::Keyval) perl-Config-Std = v0.0.4-3.fc8 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Std) perl(Fcntl) perl(version) * %check is present and once necessary build dependencies are added, all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=31, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.50 cusr + 0.20 csys = 0.70 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 05:32:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250532.l8P5Wf3t013201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-25 01:32 EST ------- This builds OK for me; rpmlint says: pysol.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pysol/pysol.py 0644 This should probably be executable as the script is actually runnable, but I guess it's not the intended means of starting the game. pysol.x86_64: E: no-binary Is there some reason this package isn't noarch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 05:44:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250544.l8P5inTm013173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-25 01:44 EST ------- Tagoh-san, would you submit a CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 05:44:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253469] Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250544.l8P5ijCe013129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opyum - Offline package installation and update tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253469 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(debarshi.ray at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2007-09-25 01:44 EST ------- I have not built it due to some problems with my workstation. I will soon release version 0.0.3 and close this bug after building it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 06:06:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250606.l8P66AVU016401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-25 02:06 EST ------- Patched from comment #11: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070925_taipeifonts/taipeifonts-1.2-2.fc8.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070925_taipeifonts/taipeifonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 06:47:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250647.l8P6lmlL021437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 02:47 EST ------- How about a url for the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 06:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250650.l8P6ojIR022011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 06:51:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250651.l8P6pkxe023771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 02:51 EST ------- (BTW I can't reach ftp://cle.linux.org.tw/pub2/fonts/bitmap/taipeifont currently.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 07:16:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250716.l8P7GsnV025469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 03:16 EST ------- Review follows: Good: + rpmlint clean + name follows upstream name (from CLE project) + meets packaging guidelines + fonts are public domain (no license file is included) + spec file is clear + dir and file ownership is good + macros used Needs attention: - no source url - noarch package builds - buildreqs listed Dunno if it is not a good idea to include say http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/re-build.readme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 07:58:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234331] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250758.l8P7w0jd032345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Direct Connect client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234331 zprikryl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zprikryl at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2007-09-25 03:57 EST ------- *** Bug 278481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 07:57:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 278481] Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250757.l8P7vxnf032301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linuxdcpp - Client for the direct connect protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=278481 zprikryl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From zprikryl at redhat.com 2007-09-25 03:57 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 234331 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 08:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250819.l8P8J3v9002996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 04:19 EST ------- correction "- noarch package builds" should have been in the "Good" section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 08:24:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253134] Review Request: jlint - Java program checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250824.l8P8OjDo002172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jlint - Java program checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253134 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-25 04:24 EST ------- jlint-1.23-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 08:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225959] Merge Review: kcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250825.l8P8PhZS004163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225959 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-25 04:25 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. e8f4244fd5e7ffef51bcdca1c5a54ebc kcc.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. - dist tag is NOT present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Pacakge kcc-2.3-27 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 08:28:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250828.l8P8Sc6b003257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-25 04:28 EST ------- solarwolf-1.5-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 08:28:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295761] Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250828.l8P8Sea1003290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: solarwolf - A Python port of SolarFox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295761 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.5-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 08:27:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273841] Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250827.l8P8Rj22004627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mencal - Menstruation calendar Alias: mencal-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273841 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-25 04:27 EST ------- mencal-2.3-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 09:01:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225242] Merge Review: alsa-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250901.l8P91mel009146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alsa-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225242 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2007-09-25 05:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Additional cleanups : > > - Pick either tabs or spaces for identing, but not both. > > - Why is the -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 still needed? The > > configure script only has a "--disable-largefile" option, so I'd assume it's > > enabled by default. If it's still needed, a quick comment would be a good thing. > > Aha. Unfortunately I have 64bit system so it's that always enabled there. I'll > try to check it on some i386. I've compared builds for i386 and for x86_64, and configure displays this for both : checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... no checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no It's very likely that the override was needed at some point, but not any more it seems. > > - The "/var/lib/alsa" line would be clearer as "%dir /var/lib/alsa/" since > > nothing below it is included (only asound.state, but it's %ghost'ed). > > Feel free to fix it. OK, I've done that, as well as changed the indentation to be the same as alsa-lib.spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 09:32:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250932.l8P9WcOL013703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-25 05:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jisksp16-1990-fonts Short Description: 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font Owners: tagoh Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 09:31:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250931.l8P9VJFR014990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-25 05:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: knm_new-fonts Short Description: 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font Owners: tagoh Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 09:34:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225634] Merge Review: cadaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250934.l8P9Y9PK015206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cadaver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225634 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2007-09-25 05:34 EST ------- Ah, the "Not built" thing is a cosmetic configure script bug, I've fixed it upstream. --enable-nls is in fact the default but being explicit here is good since the upstream default has changed over time here. Thanks again for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 09:43:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226200] Merge Review: nkf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250943.l8P9hEkc015332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nkf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226200 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-25 05:43 EST ------- Ok, the updated nkf has been built on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 09:41:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709250941.l8P9fnS8016626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2007-09-25 05:41 EST ------- Josef: ping; Can you provide the updated packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 10:16:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225959] Merge Review: kcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251016.l8PAGip8020400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: kcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225959 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-25 06:16 EST ------- Thanks. the updated kcc has been built on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 12:09:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251209.l8PC9MDT004472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 12:08:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://overholt.ca/eclipse-demos.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.ca/eclipse-demos-0.0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Eclipse demonstration screencasts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 13:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251319.l8PDJVS8015749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From cpebenito at tresys.com 2007-09-25 09:19 EST ------- http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools.spec http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools-3.3.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 13:20:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225733] Merge Review: eruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251320.l8PDKc3I017421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225733 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-25 09:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > eruby-devel.i386: W: no-dependency-on eruby No problem because eruby package provides a program and a library and -devel package doesn't requires a "program" to develop eruby application. Updated files are available at: Spec File: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/eruby/eruby.spec SRPM File: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/eruby/eruby-1.0.5-10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 14:20:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244031] Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251420.l8PEKga3028681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qfits - A stand-alone general purpose FITS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244031 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 14:38:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251438.l8PEcWLQ032659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-25 10:38 EST ------- > Can you explain a bit more here. This is a rename of package so there is bound to be some conflictions, which I don't believe are show stoppers. Now I could remove those conflictions but that would be breaking away from upstream which is something I do not want to do. > Also, > SHOULD: > Change >http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/libgssglue/libgssglue-0.1.tar.gz > to >http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Key word "SHOULD"... URL do not HAVE to be in this format. I personally find this format incredibly hard to read and basically useless. But to get this 3week review process over with, I will do it... The spec file and srpm have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 15:24:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] New: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Sothern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Sothern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/cpl.spec SRPM URL: http://astro-sfg.fis.ucm.es/~spr/cpl-3.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Common Pipeline Library (CPL) comprises a set of ISO-C libraries that provide a comprehensive, efficient and robust software toolkit. It forms a basis for the creation of automated astronomical data-reduction tasks (known as "pipelines") for ESO (European Southern Observatory) instruments. The CPL was developed to standardise the way VLT (Very Large Telescope) instrument pipelines are built, to shorten their development cycle and to ease their maintenance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 15:26:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Sothern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251526.l8PFQiUY009723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Sothern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 15:34:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251534.l8PFYvYU010007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-25 11:34 EST ------- please also check for Group:Amusements/Games please take a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 15:46:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251546.l8PFkIMG013577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-25 11:46 EST ------- fixed the initial changelog entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 15:42:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287801] Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251542.l8PFgDNR012817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sirius - Othello game for GNOME Alias: sirius https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287801 ------- Additional Comments From makghosh at gmail.com 2007-09-25 11:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) I've already fixed this. But couldn't upload the srpm and spec until now due to lack of current/internet for last two days at my place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 15:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290041] Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251550.l8PForbe013539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: generic-logos - Icons and pictures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290041 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 11:50 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:22:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251622.l8PGMYKp020253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-09-25 12:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: alex Short Description: A tool for generating lexical analysers in Haskell Owners: bos, petersen Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275831] Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251642.l8PGg8UX023617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzzub - Powerful music sequencing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275831 Bug 275831 depends on bug 237575, which changed state. Bug 237575 Summary: libsndfile should be rebuilt with flac support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237575 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|ERRATA | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:49:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251649.l8PGnvO4024164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 440volt.tux at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:48:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251648.l8PGmocI024530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-25 12:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: whowatch Short Description: Display information about users currently logged on users Owners: subhodip Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:51:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251651.l8PGp7gW024784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jima at beer.tclug.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-09-25 12:51 EST ------- OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Spec provides updated License tag OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 7039aabf3c1b3858ae8d0ccdde21343e silo-1.4.13.tar.bz2 7039aabf3c1b3858ae8d0ccdde21343e silo-1.4.13.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct See below (#1) - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below (#2) - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: Provides: silo = 1.4.13-5.fc8 Requires: /bin/sh /bin/sh libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. See below (#3) - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 0 bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package. Notes: #1: %defattr(-,root,root) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-) #2: $ rpmlint silo-1.4.13-5.fc8.sparc.rpm silo.sparc: E: statically-linked-binary /boot/ieee32.b Is this a blocker? Considering it appears to be a first-stage bootloader, I'm quite hesitant to say so. #3: Ha, ha, ha. I think we can safely ignore this for an arch-specific bootloader. Fix #1, and provide some feedback on #2 and #3 (Spot? Peter?), and I think we're good. Also, this bug depends on BZ#253043, which is (I believe) approved and built. Care to close that? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:57:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251657.l8PGvT1D025950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:59:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251659.l8PGxMYA026160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: bluecurve- |Review Request: gtk- |classic-metacity-theme - |bluecurve-engine - GTK+ |Bluecurve classic metacity |bluecurve engine |theme | ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 12:59 EST ------- retitling... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 16:57:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] New: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/gtk-bluecurve-engine/checkout/gtk-bluecurve-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/gtk-bluecurve-engine/checkout/gtk-bluecurve-engine-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a GTK+ theme engine that supports the Bluecurve theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:03:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253043] Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251703.l8PH3au5026960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:03:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251703.l8PH3bkg026996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 Bug 252456 depends on bug 253043, which changed state. Bug 253043 Summary: Review Request: elftoaout - A utility for converting ELF binaries to a.out binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253043 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251702.l8PH2djt027394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:06:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251706.l8PH60GH027979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:05:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] New: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the classic Bluecurve GDM theme that was shipped in late versions of Red Hat Linux and early versions of Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:02:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] New: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme/checkout/gtk-bluecurve-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme/checkout/gtk-bluecurve-engine-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve classic metacity theme, a theme that was shipped in late versions of Red Hat Linux and early versions of Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:09:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251709.l8PH9mfO028174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305561 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:09:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] New: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-icon-theme/checkout/bluecurve-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-icon-theme/checkout/bluecurve-icon-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains Bluecurve style cursors and icons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:07:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251707.l8PH7pXl028493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:07:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] New: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gtk-themes/checkout/bluecurve-gtk-themes.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gtk-themes/checkout/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains a collection of GTK+ themes that use the bluecurve engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:13:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251713.l8PHDVsh029131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:12:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251712.l8PHCit1029526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305581 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:14:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251714.l8PHEqIv029673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |305591 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:14:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303841] Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251714.l8PHEUWa029613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303841 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:12:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kde-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kde-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kde-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains a kde theme that uses the qt bluecurve engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the classic Bluecurve KDM theme that was shipped in late versions of Red Hat Linux and early versions of Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303841] Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251715.l8PHFbVJ030381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libflashsupport - Optional Library Interfaces for Adobe Flash Player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303841 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-25 13:15 EST ------- Warren, could you make libflashsupport.i386 available on the x86_64 tree as well? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:20:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251720.l8PHK3sk031101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |305601 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:20:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 280541] Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251720.l8PHK6IG031135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-25 13:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools.spec > http://oss.tresys.com/projects/setools/chrome/site/dists/for-fedora/setools-3.3.1-4.fc8.src.rpm > I have not checked this yet, however before I can do so please fix the following error. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=174353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:20:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305601] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305601 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kwin-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kwin-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve kwin theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:23:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251723.l8PHNNEQ031729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305621 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:23:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] New: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-metacity-theme/checkout/bluecurve-metacity-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-metacity-theme/checkout/bluecurve-metacity-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve metacity theme, a modernization of the Bluecurve classic theme, that was shipped in late versions of Red Hat Linux and early versions of Fedora Core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:26:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251726.l8PHQPTK032347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:28:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251728.l8PHSWER032561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:26:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] New: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-metacity-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-metacity-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the bluecurve engine for qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:28:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305641] New: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305641 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-xmms-skin/checkout/bluecurve-xmms-skin.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-xmms-skin/checkout/bluecurve-xmms-skin-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains a skin for the XMMS music player that matches Bluecurve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251733.l8PHXxbe001241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-25 13:33 EST ------- 0. This should (probably) be: BuildArch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251730.l8PHUffn000936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:34:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251734.l8PHYGYD001323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305671 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:30:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305651] New: Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305651 Summary: Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedorabubbles-gdm-theme/checkout/fedorabubbles-gdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedorabubbles-gdm-theme/checkout/fedorabubbles-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the FedoraBubbles GDM theme that was shipped in Fedora Core 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:34:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305671] New: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305671 Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoradna-kdm-theme/checkout/fedoradna-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoradna-kdm-theme/checkout/fedoradna-kdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the FedoraDNA KDM theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:32:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305601] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251732.l8PHWBVe001020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305601 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-25 13:32 EST ------- nice! 0. +BuildRequires: kdebase-devel probably can drop explict Requires: kdebase (it should get pulled in automatically) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:32:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251732.l8PHWc9o001108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:32:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] New: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoradna-gdm-theme/checkout/fedoradna-gdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoradna-gdm-theme/checkout/fedoradna-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the FedoraDNA GDM theme that was shipped in Fedora Core 6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:38:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251738.l8PHcT7a002375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251740.l8PHeLOI003032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305711 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:37:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251737.l8PHb8c3002215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-25 13:37 EST ------- URLS wrong, how bout: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-qt-engine.spec http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-qt-engine/checkout/bluecurve-qt-engine-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:38:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] New: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme/checkout/fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme/checkout/fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora Flying High GDM theme that was shipped in Fedora Core 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:40:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] New: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme/checkout/fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme/checkout/fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora Flying High KDM theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:37:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251737.l8PHbNJk002258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 13:37 EST ------- MUST ITEMS - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - *** Should probably be 'LGPLv2+'. Source could stand a few more license blurbs, but... eh. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - *** No upstream found. Not a blocker, but is nice to have. - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A - .la files are removed. - OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested x86_64, i386) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - *** gtk-bluecurve-engine-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm gtk-bluecurve-engine.src: W: invalid-license LGPL Already covered. gtk-bluecurve-engine.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gtk-bluecurve-engine-1.0.0/NEWS gtk-bluecurve-engine.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gtk-bluecurve-engine-1.0.0/ChangeLog gtk-bluecurve-engine.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gtk-bluecurve-engine-1.0.0/README gtk-bluecurve-engine.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL Could remove the zero-length files if you want. - final provides and requires are sane: - *** 'Requires: gtk2' seems superfluous SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - can't test, mock is broken. *Sigh* - Should build on all supported archs - tested i386, x86_64 - Should function as described. - *** Should the gtkrc bits live in this package too? - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - couldn't tell Fixing the license tag is the big thing. Is this going to have an upstream repo at some point? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:38:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251738.l8PHc3i7002043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |notting at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:41:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251741.l8PHfatP003279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 13:41 EST ------- Arguably, this should require fedora-logos. system-logos/generic-logos isn't going to provide RH specific artwork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:43:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251743.l8PHhMTg003419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:42:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251742.l8PHg8f7003360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:45:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251745.l8PHjIuo004027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:45:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] New: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedora-icon-theme/checkout/fedora-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedora-icon-theme/checkout/fedora-icon-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora icon theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:42:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] New: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rdieter at math.unl.ed u,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedora-gnome-theme/checkout/fedora-gnome-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedora-gnome-theme/checkout/fedora-gnome-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the fedora gnome meta theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:42:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251742.l8PHgRnE002794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 13:42 EST ------- Doesn't actually build in mock: checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30235 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:45:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251745.l8PHjpSv004202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 13:45 EST ------- License field is wrong Source URL should be a url or have a comment explaining why not Description is somewhat misleading, we are still shipping it. It is just not the default anymore. find_lang %{name} || touch %{name}.lang Why this construct ? Either there are translations or not... I stopped including Changelog in %doc lists, recently, but thats up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:47:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251747.l8PHlQMY003479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|than at redhat.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 13:47 EST ------- Rex, Than, Sorry for the bug spam, I didn't mean to CC you guys on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:50:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251750.l8PHof1L005131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 ------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm at redhat.com 2007-09-25 13:50 EST ------- %description should have "Fedora 7", not "Fedora Core 7"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:53:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251753.l8PHrkIp004432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:55:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251755.l8PHtG79004844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:53:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] New: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedorainfinity-gdm-theme/checkout/fedorainfinity-gdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedorainfinity-gdm-theme/checkout/fedorainfinity-gdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora Infinity GDM theme that is the default theme in Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:52:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251752.l8PHqpDm004368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-25 13:52 EST ------- "BR: java-devel" should be replaced by "BR: java-javadoc" (even if sinjdoc doesn't do crosslinked javadocs at the moment) - java-gcj-compat-devel provides java-devel. Otherwise looks good to me, feel free to import and fix before the first build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:59:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251759.l8PHxGB0006158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:57:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251757.l8PHvAXj005996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |305761 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:59:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305771] New: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305771 Summary: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedora-screensaver-theme/checkout/fedora-screensaver-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedora-screensaver-theme/checkout/fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains a Fedora branded screensaver theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 17:57:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305761] New: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme/checkout/fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme/checkout/fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora Infinity themed lock dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:10:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251810.l8PIALaB008359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dlutter at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:10 EST ------- I'm happy to do the review as soon as the comments above have been addressed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:09:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251809.l8PI9VHC006951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:09 EST ------- woops, thanks for catching that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:13:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251813.l8PID265008646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:13:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251813.l8PIDRAO007701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 14:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:17:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251817.l8PIHLNe009561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 14:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:15:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251815.l8PIFVHY009333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 14:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:24:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251824.l8PIORaw010819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 14:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:30:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251830.l8PIU2Fo012123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 14:30 EST ------- Great thanks, I've removed the version number from the virtual Provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251826.l8PIQGSn011629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:26 EST ------- Okay those issues should be fixed now. Jeremy is going to do a mass import on hosted.fedoraproject.org for the various packages. Failing that, I would just put things on elvis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:33:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251833.l8PIX8ps012666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:33 EST ------- Trimmed the description. the find_lang shortcut, is just because the upstream tarballs don't yet contain translations. At some point in the near future they may. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:33:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251833.l8PIXZU7011656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 14:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-channel-phing Short Description: Adds phing channel to PEAR Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251831.l8PIVYfL011489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org 2007-09-25 14:31 EST ------- I've bowdlerized the description as you requested and added a dependency on Test::More. SPEC: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std.spec SRPM: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std-v0.0.4-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:40:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251840.l8PIeSYQ014159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:40 EST ------- thanks, fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:44:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251844.l8PIiFq9013434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 14:44 EST ------- Could you possibly just make the subpackage 'cyberjack-pcsc' and keep the main package as 'ctapi-cyberjack' ? Perhaps it would be worth asking the fedora-packaging-list folks? I'm going to unset the cvs flag for now until it's determined what needs to be done here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:49:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251849.l8PIn1MY015208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 14:49 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-channel-phing.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-channel-phing-1.0.0-4.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - removed version number in virtual provides - replaced static commands with macros wherever applicable - added post/postun requires for pear - removed redundant version number requirement for php-cli -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:50:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305601] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251850.l8PIoN83014738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305601 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:50 EST ------- thanks fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:47:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251847.l8PIlwCZ014211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:47 EST ------- Hi Rex, Isn't it already BuildArch: noarch ? Bill, yea I guess so. changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:46:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251846.l8PIkjq4014138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 14:46 EST ------- > At some point in the near future they may. Worth a quick comment, just like the src url still is. Also, what is the strategy wrt to obsoleting redhat-artwork, or conflicting with it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:53:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251853.l8PIrMCL015244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-25 14:53 EST ------- I don't think you could push this to EL-4 (pear really too old), or you need a completely different spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 18:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251857.l8PIv88g016696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-25 14:57 EST ------- All issues fixed APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:03:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251903.l8PJ3wkJ017927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-25 15:03 EST ------- I think we'd want a package named pcsc-lite-cyberjack for the pcsc bits, openct already does that. Use "%package -n pcsc-lite-cyberjack" etc in the specfile to accomplish that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:05:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305591] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251905.l8PJ5HlL017654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305591 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-25 15:05 EST ------- Re: noarch, you're right, I'm blind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:32:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251932.l8PJWWP1023621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 15:32 EST ------- Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/aldrin.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/aldrin-0.11-4.fc7.src.rpm The updated patch fixes both doc loading issues, for libzzub's plugin docs and aldrin's itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:32:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251932.l8PJWcwe022625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 15:32 EST ------- License field invalid Source needs to be a url or have a comment find_lang construct could do with a comment So, this package now contains the default system gtkrc but the gconf settings for the default theme still live somewhere else ? Requires seem somewhat incongruent, Requires: nodoka-theme-gnome Requires: fedora-icon-theme Requires: fedora-screensaver-theme Requires: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme Since nodoka-theme-gnome is already a "meta" package. shouldn't we explicitly list all the components ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:40:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301391] Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251940.l8PJeLOa025265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odt2txt - Converts an OpenDocument to plain text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301391 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:39:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251939.l8PJdhae024683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-25 15:39 EST ------- Ah yes, should have retested the change, sorry. Files reuploaded -- the debug patch is no longer in the SRPM, to suppress rpmlint complaining that it's not applied; it's at http://hircus.org/fedora/fbreader/fbreader-debug.patch Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:58:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251958.l8PJwqHV028247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 15:58 EST ------- OK. Approved as is, but I wonder if this and 30551 should be rolled into one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 19:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709251957.l8PJvJwg028163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-25 15:57 EST ------- This is pretty much trivial. rpmlint says: eclipse-demos.noarch: W: invalid-license Open Publication License According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing, the License: tag should be "Open Publication". This license is also only acceptable without the optional clauses in the sixth section. Actually I can't tell if anything in the sixth section of the license applies at all, because those options are supposed to be used in the incorporation by reference, and there's nothing to attach such a reference to unless they're in the oggs somehow. I'm going to assume not. Also, you should %doc the license file. The only other question I have is regarding the totem requirement. I can view this without using totem (from a KDE system, say, or one with mplayer), and I could just serve the files via the web or something. Frankly I'd just drop it. * source files match upstream: 0a3a42da854f4f20c93baa80658ade0c08b9ae66edfc174343f9ba41f9605655 eclipse-demos-0.0.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license (but should use approved short form) * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (x86_64, development). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint. ? final provides and requires; totem probably shouldn't be there. eclipse-demos-0.0.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm eclipse-demos = 0.0.1-1.fc8 = ? totem * %check is not present; a test suite isn't really applicable. I watched a couple of the videos and they look OK to me. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 20:04:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252004.l8PK4FAf028047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 20:17:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252017.l8PKHIjA031571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-09-25 16:17 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I've updated the License field and dropped the totem requirement. New spec and SRPM: http://overholt.ca/eclipse-demos.spec http://overholt.ca/eclipse-demos-0.0.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 20:33:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252033.l8PKXODp000711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |notting at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 16:33 EST ------- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - *** Without any supporting information, the license tag should be 'GPL+'. If something was added to the gtkrc files, I suppose it could be changed to a different versions. Then again, I wonder if gtkrc files are even enough of a work to be copyrightable. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - *** There's a duplicated comment. - Sources match upstream md5sum: - N/A - no upstream yet - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot -OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - *** bluecurve-gtk-themes.src: W: invalid-license GPL See above. bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0/ChangeLog bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0/NEWS bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/bluecurve-gtk-themes-1.0.0/README Can remove. bluecurve-gtk-themes.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This package contains a collection of GTK+ themes that use the bluecurve engine. You could word wrap this. - final provides and requires are sane: - *** Could probably remove the explicit gtk2 require since the engine will pull it in , but... shrug. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK - Should build on all supported archs - OK - Should function as described. - seems to work - Should have dist tag - OK Fix the license tag, mainly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 20:48:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252048.l8PKmN5a003291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 16:48 EST ------- license tag fixed and duplicate comment removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 20:55:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252055.l8PKtCIP004964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |notting at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 16:55 EST ------- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK - License field in spec matches - *** Should be GPL+. Of course, not much copyrightable here. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - BuildRequires correct - *** Needs perl(XML::Parser) - Spec handles locales/find_lang - OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch - tested x86_64 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - *** fedora-icon-theme.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/fedora-icon-theme-1.0.0/NEWS fedora-icon-theme.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/fedora-icon-theme-1.0.0/ChangeLog fedora-icon-theme.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/fedora-icon-theme-1.0.0/README Can be removed. fedora-icon-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL See above. - final provides and requires are sane: I don't see any reason why this requires system-logos. What it probably should require is mist-icon-theme or gnome-icon-theme, as that's what it inherits from. Should probably provide system-icon-theme, as well. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - See above about buildreqs - Should function as described. - didn't test - Should have sane scriptlets. - OK - Should have dist tag - OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 20:56:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252056.l8PKuJK5005180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 16:56 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:01:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252101.l8PL10Ml005545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252101.l8PL1t1k006099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:04:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252104.l8PL4FA6006203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-25 17:04 EST ------- Make the package noarch... Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-cardsets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-cardsets-4.40-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:03:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252103.l8PL3FVX006143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-25 17:03 EST ------- I made the package noarch and although like you said not really needed, /usr/share/pysol/pysol.py is executable. Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-4.82-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:06:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252106.l8PL6B0n006603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 17:06 EST ------- should be fixed up now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:04:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304341] Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252104.l8PL43Dw005889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304341 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-25 17:04 EST ------- Make the package noarch... Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-music.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-music-4.40-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:06:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252106.l8PL6eWx006985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-25 17:06 EST ------- Looks great; rpmlint is quiet and the issues I had are fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:13:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252113.l8PLDhgu008010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2007-09-25 17:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-demos Short Description: Eclipse screencasts Owners: overholt at redhat.com,jjohnstn at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:21:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252121.l8PLL6br009546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 17:21 EST ------- Still would like Provides: system-icon-theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252130.l8PLU3U8010470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 17:30 EST ------- woops, sorry, doing too many things at once, should be good to go now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:33:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305741] Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252133.l8PLXxBP011098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-icon-theme - Fedora icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305741 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-25 17:33 EST ------- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:44:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295041] Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252144.l8PLiVpB012533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-fedora - Python modules for talking to Fedora Infrastructure Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295041 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.90.19-1 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-25 17:44 EST ------- Packages imported and built for FC-6, F-7, EL-5, and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 21:49:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252149.l8PLnuJI013385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 17:49 EST ------- Added the comments. I guess I'm going to need to get all the packages that Requires: redhat-artwork updated to require the part they actually need. We may want to add a Provides: redhat-artwork in fedora-gnome-theme since it will pull in most of the content, not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 22:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252226.l8PMQJut019598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2007-09-25 18:26 EST ------- koji is choking due to ppc and ppc64 build failures. What should I do about this? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=174765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 23:15:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252315.l8PNF3dq027416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 19:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 23:12:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252312.l8PNCALV026978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 19:12 EST ------- Alexander: Do you wish to modify your cvs request in light of comment #6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 23:17:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304861] Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252317.l8PNHBJm027126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-demos - Eclipse screencasts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304861 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-25 19:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 23:38:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252338.l8PNcKbZ030028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Keywords| |i18n Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-25 19:38 EST ------- Since the taipeifont is being independent, there would be no sources in this package. fonts-chinese might be converted into a meta-package with just dependencies on rpms of all available Chinese fonts. Jens, could you kindly discuss the above process with me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 25 23:56:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253941] Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709252356.l8PNuqYN000726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util - A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253941 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 00:16:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260016.l8Q0GnfH002906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 20:16 EST ------- Koji has been a bit unstable recently, please try again later after excluding ppc64 until ghc is available there. (It would be good to file a bug to track that too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 00:50:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260050.l8Q0oUPc008322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 20:50 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok package guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: must be included spec file language: ok spec file legible: yes upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: must own /usr/share/themes/Bluecurve-classic and its subdirectory permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a library symlinks: n/a devel package: n/a la files: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok include the license file and fix the directory ownership, then it is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 00:51:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260051.l8Q0pdZ0007794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 20:51 EST ------- Actually I'm co-maintaining an additional EL-4 system (CentOS 4.5) and wanted to support it officially, so I'd thought it would be a good idea. If you're saying EL-4 support is problematic, drop both EL-{4,5} from the cvs request and leave it as F-7. How is the procedure to get a separate Spec for EL-4 approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 00:55:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260055.l8Q0tcc4009025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 20:55 EST ------- Sorry, mistake: The cvs request says "php-channel-phing", I've confused it with Bug 275231; The request should read now: Package Name: php-channel-phpdb Short Description: Adds phpdb channel to PEAR Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 00:59:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260059.l8Q0xPo4009295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|Package Review |4Suite Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 00:59:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260059.l8Q0xiGE009345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-25 20:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-channel-phing Short Description: Adds phing channel to PEAR Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 01:18:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260118.l8Q1IFnk011537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 21:18 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: must be included spec language: ok spec readable: yes upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: must add perl(XML::Parser) locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %file: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok should the Requires: fedora-logos be Requires: system-logos instead ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 01:20:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260120.l8Q1KQbU012756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 01:46:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260146.l8Q1kkg9016358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 02:38:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260238.l8Q2cSxh024752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 22:38 EST ------- rpmlint says: bluecurve-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/64x64/stock/stock-media-stop.png ../../64x64/stock/media-playback-stop.png bluecurve-icon-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/32x32/stock/stock-save.png ../../32x32/actions/document-save.png bluecurve-icon-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: invalid license file: must be included spec language: ok spec readability: ok upstream source: no upstream yet buildable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: perl(XML::Parser) is missing locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %file: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Further comments: There is a typo in the %description: Blucurve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 02:57:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260257.l8Q2v8CF028487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 22:57 EST ------- should be good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:12:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260312.l8Q3C9vU031315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:12:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260312.l8Q3CDYM031348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 23:12 EST ------- adding COPYING and BuildRequires. We want fedora-logos because the theme is Fedora branded by design. Well, maybe. The other gdm themes definitely. Bluecurve is debatable actually. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:23:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260323.l8Q3Nsar000881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-25 23:23 EST ------- Remember this is new package review and not Merge review. I would like to see package links and not to see wordings "The spec file and srpm have been updated." Provide me package links as you did in initial comment. If you check a normal procedure of review is that for each change in SPEC during review submitter has to update release tag and give direct download links to SRPM in each update he provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:21:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260321.l8Q3Ll5D000766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 23:21 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/bluecurve-kde-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm bluecurve-kde-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: invalid license file: must be included spec language: English spec legibility: good upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: must BR kdebase-devel locales: ok shaerd libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %file: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filename: ok Further comment: Should capitalize bluecurve in the description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:54:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260354.l8Q3s7Af004997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-25 23:54 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/bluecurve-metacity-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm bluecurve-metacity-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: invalid license file: ok spec file language: AE spec file readability: excellent upstream sources: no upstream yet buildability: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: who is supposed to own /usr/share/themes/Bluecurve in the new regime ? %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: see above %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Further comments: %description is misleading, since we are to this day shipping Bluecurve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:54:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260354.l8Q3sYrS005037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-25 23:54 EST ------- why do I need to BuildRequires: kdebase-devel ? It's a noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 03:54:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260354.l8Q3sHhF005011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:03:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260403.l8Q43nEp006280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-26 00:03 EST ------- That's in bluecurve-qt-engine then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:03:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260403.l8Q43KvC006337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-26 00:03 EST ------- Maybe he assumed (like me) that this contained the Bluecurve kde widget style as well. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260402.l8Q42gtt006305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 00:02 EST ------- fixed. I'm going to need to do another one bluecurve-gnome-theme to cover the directory ownership (and old the meta theme file). It fell through the cracks when I did the split up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:08:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260408.l8Q48Gns006988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 00:08 EST ------- Yup. I invented that name, so if you think it should be called bluecurve-kde-engine, or if the two packages should be merged into one bluecurve-kde-theme, just let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:45:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260445.l8Q4jww1011485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 00:45 EST ------- before final review, 1) Do you think package name and its binary name should be unique? e.g. Package name is fbreader and actually your package is installing FBReader binary. Also, /usr/share/pixmaps/FBReader and /usr/share/FBReader represents package name which must be FBReader but your package name is fbreader and its creating /usr/share/doc/fbreader-0.8.6d. So What I want to say Can you maintain uniqueness in package name and its binary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260449.l8Q4n32T011605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 00:49 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/bluecurve-qt-engine-*.rpm bluecurve-qt-engine.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL bluecurve-qt-engine.src: W: invalid-license LGPL bluecurve-qt-engine-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: invalid license file: ok spec language: AE spec readability: excellent upstream sources: no upstream yet buildability: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: configure looks for KDE headers, so needs to BR kdebase-devel locales: ok shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: /usr/lib/gt-3.3/plugins/styles is owned by redhat-artwork-kde, so you should probably require that. Ir is that going to be cut into pieces, too ? %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 04:49:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260449.l8Q4nFYQ011808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 05:10:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260510.l8Q5A84h014637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 01:10 EST ------- you SHOULD use 1) Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) mock build went successful after removing BR: pkgconfig. So you should remove pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 05:18:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260518.l8Q5IYbd015637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 01:18 EST ------- changed license to LGPLv2, added build requires I don't think redhat-artwork-kde should own that directory--qt should, yea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 05:46:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225733] Merge Review: eruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260546.l8Q5k7e0018851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225733 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 01:46 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but not for RPM. eruby-devel.i386: W: no-dependency-on eruby + source files match upstream. af294fe34dc6cf24228aec95167b3099 eruby-1.0.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. - dist tag is NOT present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel and -libs subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Package eruby-1.0.5-10 -> Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1 libdl.so.2 liberuby.so.1.0 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libruby.so.1.8 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package eruby-libs-1.0.5-10 -> Provides: eruby.so liberuby.so.1.0 ruby(eruby) = 1.0.5 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libcrypt.so.1 libdl.so.2 liberuby.so.1.0 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libruby.so.1.8 rtld(GNU_HASH) ruby(abi) = 1.8 + Package eruby-devel-1.0.5-10 -> Requires: liberuby.so.1.0 ruby(eruby) = 1.0.5 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 06:00:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260600.l8Q60fYU020987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 02:00 EST ------- should be good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 06:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260602.l8Q62uis021191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 02:02 EST ------- New patch seems to work well, then ------------------------------------------------------------ diff -up aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py.docfix aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py --- aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py.docfix 2007-09-25 21:16:54.000000000 +0200 +++ aldrin-0.11/share/aldrin/router.py 2007-09-25 21:17:19.000000000 +0200 @@ -698,8 +698,8 @@ class ParameterDialog(gtk.Dialog): uri = filenameify(self.pluginloader.get_uri()) name = filenameify(self.pluginloader.get_name()) helpfilepaths = [ - filepath('../doc/zzub/plugins/' + uri + '/index.html'), - filepath('../doc/zzub/plugins/' + name + '/index.html'), + filepath('../doc/libzzub-0.2.3/plugins/' + uri + '/index.html'), + filepath('../doc/libzzub-0.2.3/plugins/' + name + '/index.html'), ] for path in helpfilepaths: print "searching for '%s'..." % path ------------------------------------------------------------- It may be better that this aldrin require specific version of pyzzub, i.e. "Requires: pyzzub = 0.2.3" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 06:07:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] New: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phuang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec SRPM URL: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: a python wrapper for SCIM input platform. With it, IM developers may use python language to create Input Methods. This package also includes a sample input engine - English Writer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 07:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260708.l8Q789v7028693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 03:08 EST ------- need fix 1)Add BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser),pygtk2-devel 2) Remove BuildRequires: autoconf, automake -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 07:08:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 234581] Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260708.l8Q78SAF028723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mapnik cartography library - first package, need sponsor. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234581 kms at passback.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kms at passback.co.uk| |) | ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-09-26 03:08 EST ------- Upstream is on vacation for the next couple of weeks with no Internet access. I'll ping them when they return and try to get this moving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 07:18:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260718.l8Q7IRrS029945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 03:18 EST ------- thanks for your updates to SPEC. But sorry I can't approve this package as I can still see package "file /etc/gssapi_mech.conf from install of libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8 conflicts with file from package libgssapi-0.11-1.fc7" What workaround I can suggest here is to add Provides: libgssapi = 0.11-1.fc7 Obsoletes: libgssapi <= 0.11-1.fc7 below following line in SPEC file Requires: krb5-libs >= 1.5 When built with above changes and tried to install on F7 machine as it gave me rpm -Uvh libgssglue-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm libgssglue-devel-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgssapi.so.2 is needed by (installed) libtirpc-0.1.7-7.fc7.i386 libgssapi.so.2 is needed by (installed) nfs-utils-1.1.0-3.fc7.i386 libgssapi.so.2(libgssapi_CITI_2) is needed by (installed) libtirpc-0.1.7-7.fc7.i386 libgssapi.so.2(libgssapi_CITI_2) is needed by (installed) nfs-utils-1.1.0-3.fc7.i386 That mean you need to ask all packages that depends on libgssapi.so.2 to build against libgssglue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 07:17:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260717.l8Q7HPku030567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-26 03:17 EST ------- Duh? Why 4Suite!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 07:28:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260728.l8Q7S4Ld031198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 03:28 EST ------- scim-python.spec and scim-python-0.1.2-1.fc7.src.rpm have been refreshed. Please check it. Below is diff from scim-python.spec. Thanks. =================================================================== --- scim-python.spec.in (revision 49) +++ scim-python.spec.in (working copy) @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ Source0: http://scim-python.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext, gettext-devel, autoconf, automake, libtool, python -Requires: scim python-enchant +BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext, gettext-devel, libtool, python-devel, pygtk2-devel, perl(XML::Parser) +Requires: scim, python-enchant, pygtk2 %description Python IMEngine for SCIM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 07:43:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260743.l8Q7hq79001274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 03:43 EST ------- - I think the License field should say LGPLv2+ - gettext-devel will pull in gettext anyway - "%{_libdir}/scim*/*" are owned by scim so it should be "%{_libdir}/scim*/*/%{name}*.so" say -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:07:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260807.l8Q87wf9004030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 04:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > - I think the License field should say LGPLv2+ > > - gettext-devel will pull in gettext anyway > > - "%{_libdir}/scim*/*" are owned by scim so it should be > "%{_libdir}/scim*/*/%{name}*.so" say Those problems have been fixed and files have been refreshed. Please check it. Thanks. =================================================================== --- scim-python.spec.in (revision 49) +++ scim-python.spec.in (working copy) @@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Python IMEngine for Smart Common Input Method platform -License: LGPLv2 +License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://code.google.com/p/scim-python/ Source0: http://scim-python.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext, gettext-devel, autoconf, automake, libtool, python -Requires: scim python-enchant +BuildRequires: scim-devel, gettext-devel, libtool, python-devel, pygtk2-devel, perl(XML::Parser) +Requires: scim, python-enchant, pygtk2 %description Python IMEngine for SCIM. @@ -40,9 +40,8 @@ %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS COPYING README TODO %{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.so -%{_libdir}/scim*/* -%{_datadir}/scim-python/engine/* -%{_datadir}/scim-python/setupui/* +%{_libdir}/scim*/*/%{name}*.so +%{_datadir}/scim-python/* %{_datadir}/scim/icons/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:10:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260810.l8Q8AFTI005286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 04:10 EST ------- Can you prepare a draft spec file and I will give feedback. Look at the new fonts-korean.spec as an example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:11:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260811.l8Q8BeXn004595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-26 04:11 EST ------- updated Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect.spec updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/cdcollect-0.6.0-3.src.rpm changes - fixed URLs - removed unneeded BR: pkgconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260819.l8Q8JFli005391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 04:19 EST ------- > Those problems have been fixed Thanks. :) > and files have been refreshed. Please check it. Could you please provide the urls for the spec and srpm for each revision. The release number should be bumped too please. You need to own %{_datadir}/scim-python/ too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:22:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260822.l8Q8MJsh006874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 04:22 EST ------- rpmlint says scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so I think it is not a blocker but you might prefer to use a relsymlink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:28:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260828.l8Q8S04U006883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 04:27 EST ------- ugh, sorry, "buildreqs listed" should also have been under Good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:30:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260830.l8Q8UfCV008166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 04:30 EST ------- * For python sitelib/arch directory, please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:32:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305281] Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260832.l8Q8W8LC008385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpl - ESO (European Southern Observatory) library for automated astronomical data-reduction tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305281 spr at astrax.fis.ucm.es changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cpl - ESO |Review Request: cpl - ESO |(European Sothern |(European Southern |Observatory) library for |Observatory) library for |automated astronomical data-|automated astronomical data- |reduction tasks |reduction tasks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:36:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260836.l8Q8a6Hu009150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 04:36 EST ------- * Rebuild fails at least on x86_64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175148 - Note: the build.log says: ------------------------------------------------------------ RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/scim-python-0.1.2-1.fc8-root-kojibuilder/usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/*.so Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.la /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so ------------------------------------------------------------ scim.so must be installed under python_sitearch (i.e. under /usr/lib64), not under python_sitelib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 08:48:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 04:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260848.l8Q8mF4l009830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 04:48 EST ------- How about http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz for the source url? Do you have a better one? Also I just noticed the "Buildroot" should updated to the current recommendations: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 09:07:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709260907.l8Q97XGc013831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 05:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Could you please provide the urls for the spec and srpm for each revision. > The release number should be bumped too please. Sorry. I refreshed the files on web. I do not reserve the old version. > You need to own %{_datadir}/scim-python/ too. Fixed. add %dir %{_datadir}/scim-python (In reply to comment #6) > rpmlint says > > scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so > scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so > > I think it is not a blocker but you might prefer to use a relsymlink. It has a little difficulty to create relsymlink now. If it is not blocker, I will try fix it later. (In reply to comment #8) > * Rebuild fails at least on x86_64 Fixed. Please retry it. Thanks The new URLs: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec-2 http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.2-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 10:04:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261004.l8QA49NB022471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 06:04 EST ------- * cool. So many comments. thanks to Jens and Mamoru. *rpmlint on SRPM says scim-python.src:54: W: macro-in-%changelog dir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. * on RPM it said scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. * And build.log showed warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so So from %files section you should remove %{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/*.so * otherwise package looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 10:17:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261017.l8QAHZIx024593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 06:17 EST ------- Still seems not okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 10:31:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261031.l8QAVmT5025645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 06:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Still seems not okay. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175238 Could you tell me how to build it on koji? When I update the spec file, I may try it by self. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 10:47:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261047.l8QAl6gn027795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 06:47 EST ------- You can try by: koji build --scratch Currently target can be "dist-f8" or "dist-fc7-updates-candidate". If rebuild ends successfully, the result binary rpms are put under htt://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 10:48:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261048.l8QAmLcW028889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 06:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > If rebuild ends successfully, the result binary rpms are put under > htt://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ Of course this is http:// -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 10:46:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261046.l8QAkRrA028745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 06:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Still seems not okay. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=175238 I modified to fix rpmlint checking warning on SRPM and build warning for rpm. And I also fix the build problem for X86_64 arch, but without test. :-/ The new URLs: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec-3 http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.2-3.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:05:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261105.l8QB5BZZ030278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 07:05 EST ------- It passed the koji build. The problem is in a Makefile.am in the tarball. It does not install the .so file into /usr/lib64/... in x86_64 arch, and it still install .so into /usr/lib/... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:01:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261101.l8QB1Odk030877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 07:01 EST ------- I think if macro is not getting expanded to lib64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:15:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261115.l8QBF2wx031753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 07:15 EST ------- In that case you can use arch specific patch for Makefile like say %ifarch x86_64 %patch1 -p1 %endif and need to change accordingly at other places in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:14:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261114.l8QBEdjj031477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:11:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261111.l8QBB7fx031304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 07:11 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint complains for RPM as cdcollect.i386: E: no-binary cdcollect.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib But these can be ignored for mono packages. + source files match upstream. 33f71604b9dfb84497b4bc2fce69e89b cdcollect-0.6.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + GConf scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + Package cdcollect-0.6.0-3.fc8 -> Provides: config(cdcollect) = 0.6.0-3.fc8 mono(cdcollect) = 0.2.2825.11093 Requires: /bin/sh config(cdcollect) = 0.6.0-3.fc8 gnome-sharp gtk-sharp2 >= 2.8.0 mono-core >= 1.1.17 mono-data-sqlite sqlite >= 3.3.5 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:14:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261114.l8QBESOT032462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:19:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261119.l8QBJFJb032370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-26 07:19 EST ------- Where's the KWin theme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261121.l8QBLskJ001414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-26 07:21 EST ------- Is the BR kdebase-devel actually needed here? I think it isn't, it's needed only for the KWin theme, which isn't part of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:25:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261125.l8QBPhrJ001188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 07:25 EST ------- Is this still waiting for any builds or we can CLOSE this review ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:27:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261127.l8QBRNoB001316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-26 07:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cdcollect Short Description: Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261132.l8QBWx9M003047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 07:32 EST ------- * For scim-python*.so: - Well, this package installs scim-python.so under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ (on i386), however on my rawhide system the directory /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ does not exist and _perhaps_ this must be installed under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/ (this directory is owned by scim-1.4.7-5.fc8) - Similary, /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI does not exist on my system, and /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/ is owned by scim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 11:54:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261154.l8QBsTqk005189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 07:54 EST ------- If you don't already the scim pkgconfig config from scim-devel should be used to give you the correct install location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 12:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261202.l8QC2g0S006627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 08:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > * For scim-python*.so: > - Well, this package installs scim-python.so under > /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ (on i386), however on my rawhide > system the directory /usr/lib/scim-1.0/IMEngine/ does not exist > and _perhaps_ this must be installed under > /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/ (this directory is owned > by scim-1.4.7-5.fc8) > > - Similary, /usr/lib/scim-1.0/SetupUI does not exist on my system, > and /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/ is owned by scim yes. you are right. Other scim-* say scim-hangul, scim-anthy are installing under /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/ and /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/ For this you need to patch configure.in run autoconf in SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 12:08:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261208.l8QC8q6K007509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 08:08 EST ------- SCIM_MODULEDIR=`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=moduledir scim` should help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 12:22:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261222.l8QCMgjo009777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 08:22 EST ------- or just directly patch configure file but that made me to have %files section for that as %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/scim-python.so %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so instead to have it as %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/*/IMEngine/scim-python.so %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/*/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so which is preferred by most of other scim-* packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:34:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261334.l8QDYKQT021760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 09:34 EST ------- It's here: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/ I apparently didn't file a review request for it. Will do so now (and double check that I didn't miss any others) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:36:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261336.l8QDap7w021743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |306951 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:36:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org,notting at redhat. com,rdieter at math.unl.edu,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kde-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kde-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kde-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve kwin theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:39:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261339.l8QDdrg4022082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-26 09:39 EST ------- > Provide me package links as you did in initial comment. I just assumed since the spec file and srpm were in the exact same place you could continue to used the original links. Sorry for such a bad assumption. I'll guess I go head and cut and past them from the original posting. > What workaround I can suggest here is to add > Provides: libgssapi = 0.11-1.fc7 > Obsoletes: libgssapi <= 0.11-1.fc7 > below following line in SPEC file > Requires: krb5-libs >= 1.5 updated spec and srpm. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/libgssglue/libgssglue.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/libgssglue/libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm > rpm -Uvh libgssglue-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm libgssglue-devel-0.1-2.fc7.i386.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: Of course there will be dependency problem because I have not been able to check this package in! As soon as I can check this package in, those dependency problem will go away because I will be able to update the packages at are depending it. Please note *all* the packages that are dependent on this I maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:38:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261338.l8QDc4Us022648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 09:38 EST ------- err, the urls are wrong, Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kwin-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kwin-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kwin-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:43:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261343.l8QDhjCe023951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-26 09:43 EST ------- Well, it doesn't actually use a *trademarked* logo (this is just the old Fedora font on a big blue background, right?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:47:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261347.l8QDli2n023675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 09:47 EST ------- Okay, yea, let's make this one system-logos then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:47:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:47:08 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230164=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt73usb-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2571W/RT2671_A/B/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261347.l8QDl8Sf024647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-26 09:47 EST ------- ok, this package can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:54:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:54:42 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230164=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt73usb-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2571W/RT2671_A/B/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261354.l8QDsgGB024638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2007-09-26 09:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rt73usb-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors Owners: kwizart Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes Thx for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 13:53:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261353.l8QDrLGa025551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2007-09-26 09:53 EST ------- Updated again: Spec URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/madan-fonts/madan-fonts-1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:01:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261401.l8QE1SuX026038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-09-26 10:01 EST ------- No, I mean if it's not trademarked, you can just put the graphic in the theme. Or leave it in fedora-logos, either or. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:06:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261406.l8QE67hu028068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 10:06 EST ------- * thanks very much that finally you got my point that links must be provided each time to reviewer to avoid confusion between old and new SPEC. * But that doesn't mean you should not increment release tag. And for above change, do you think its so small to previous SPEC you provided? No. You must update release tag and provide new links for final review. *Remember to run rpmlint on all SRPM,RPM files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:11:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261411.l8QEB1bQ027622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 10:11 EST ------- ah right, that's even nicer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:15:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261415.l8QEFGT9029795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-26 10:15 EST ------- This patch got lost here: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/redhat-artwork/devel/redhat-artwork-7.0.0-kdm-userlist.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:12:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261412.l8QECNSE029297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-26 10:12 EST ------- Than's patch to fix bug #276731: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/redhat-artwork/devel/redhat-artwork-7.0.0-kwin-bluecurve.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup got lost again. Can this please be committed to the upstream tree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:22:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306951] Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261422.l8QEM3BD029365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kwin-theme - Bluecurve kwin theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306951 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 10:22 EST ------- sure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:29:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261429.l8QET59a030338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 10:29 EST ------- thanks, applied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:51:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261451.l8QEp5Y2001979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |307171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 14:51:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307171] New: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org,notting at redhat. com,rdieter at math.unl.edu,than at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-kdm-theme/checkout/bluecurve-kdm-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve kdm theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 15:28:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261528.l8QFSS3b009927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|4Suite |Package Review ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 11:28 EST ------- Sometimes the component gets changed randomly. I don't know if this is a firefox bug or a bugzilla bug. It's no big deal; I just change it back when I have something else to add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 15:51:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261551.l8QFpGIg013669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-26 11:51 EST ------- What is going on here? It's over two months since the package was approved and I can't find anything in CVS. There are some bugs too: o license policy has changed since review: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing License should be changed to GPLv2 o build not honor compiler flags: http://tinyurl.com/2n3qqh o should build latest release: new release from 2007-08-03 available I have created an update package fixing these bugs, it's here: SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils-0.0-0.20070803snap.fc7.src.rpm Do you still want to maintain this package for Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 15:59:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305561] Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261559.l8QFxI3o013456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-icon-theme - Bluecurve icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305561 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 11:59 EST ------- Almost. Just fix the license for real before you import it. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 15:57:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244936] Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261557.l8QFvWqN013259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbench - Filesystem load benchmarking tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244936 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-26 11:57 EST ------- Have pushed an update. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:01:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261601.l8QG1JHa015607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 12:01 EST ------- It needs kdebase-devel because configure complains if it is not there... Just mock-build it and see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 15:58:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261558.l8QFwbjf014930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2007-09-26 11:58 EST ------- > * But that doesn't mean you should not increment release tag. And for above > change, do you think its so small to previous SPEC you provided? I did, I went from -1 to -2 and group all the comments under the "RPM review" changelog which I think *very* appropriate. Why artificially increase version numbers for basically the same bug (or process in this case). Also, Isn't up the the discretion of the maintainer to decide when and why to increase a version number? I would surely hope so. > No. You must update release tag and provide new links for final review. No. I feel the way I'm managing this tag for my package is just fine. Now if so choose not to let this package into fedora due to silly issue like tag number (after working on this for 3 weeks) so be it... > *Remember to run rpmlint on all SRPM,RPM files. I did and I see no errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:04:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261604.l8QG4gnw016275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 12:04 EST ------- the configure script complains if it is not there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:03:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261603.l8QG33tl016131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 12:03 EST ------- but then you need to make this package require bluecurve-gnome-theme ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:40:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261640.l8QGeAnJ021192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-26 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:37:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261637.l8QGbkIM021985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-26 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. There isn't really any procedure to review a seperate spec for el branches. Perhaps you could do some testing and get it all working for epel and then request branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:44:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261644.l8QGihiC022973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-26 12:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 16:42:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:42:51 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_230164=5D_Review_Request=3A_rt73usb-firmwa?= =?iso-8859-1?q?re_-_Firmware_for_Ralink=C2=AE_RT2571W/RT2671_A/B/G?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_network_adaptors?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261642.l8QGgp7n022815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rt73usb-firmware - Firmware for Ralink? RT2571W/RT2671 A/B/G network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230164 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-26 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 17:09:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261709.l8QH9rjc027170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 13:09 EST ------- i don't know, aside from the dir ownership issue, it makes more sense for bluecurve-gnome-theme to require bluecurve-metacity-theme, not the other way around... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 17:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261714.l8QHEkR0027922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 13:14 EST ------- A few complaints: the manpages are executable, which rpmlint dutifully complains about: aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/e2writeboot.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/sdisklabel.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/isomarkboot.1.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/swriteboot.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/abootconf.8.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/netabootwrap.1.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man5/aboot.conf.5.gz aboot.alpha: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/aboot.8.gz I notice that the normal set of compiler flags aren't used. Now, this is a bootloader so I can understand why, although there are userspace programs included which perhaps should be built like any other userspace program. Given that this is for Alpha, though, I can't even be truly sure what the proper compilation flags are. This package does not meet the versioning guidelines; when 1.0 is released, it will sort lower than the current package name. The guidelines specify the proper version and release to be used as: 1.0-0.2.pre20040408 You can increment the '2' for each new revision, and when 1.0 is released you can just use "1.0-1" without worrying about any sorting issues. There's a COPYING file in the tarball, which must be included in the package. * source files match upstream: a8ae8f2bf549c1cc79ea66a0a11c8db5c0257ce0d94b97418eb1c658723b12d2 aboot-1.0_pre20040408.tar.bz2 X package does not meet versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text included in tarball but not in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. ? compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, alpha). * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no way to test this pacakge. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions are not appropriate (executable manpages) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 18:21:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] New: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX-1.10.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: A library for: - A+R/B trees to use for lists or maps (associative arrays) - Deques (double-ended queues) (Stacks (LIFO) / Queues (FIFOs)) - platform independent opendir-style directory access - platform independent dlopen-style shared library access - auto-storage strings with direct access - command line option (argv) parser - shell-style config file parser - platform independent random number generator with transparent /dev/urandom support - various string, memory and zvec ops -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 18:21:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261821.l8QILt9d006643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libHX URL| |http://jengelh.hopto.org/f/l | |ibHX/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 18:28:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261828.l8QISUSA006770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From mchristi at redhat.com 2007-09-26 14:28 EST ------- My fault. I must have just done the RHEL sources and forgot to do FC for some reason. If you want to maintain it or help, that is fine with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:00:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173054] Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261900.l8QJ0Jei014061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173054 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-26 15:00 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wavpack New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:03:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] New: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mricon at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/twitux.spec SRPM URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/twitux-0.50-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Twitux is a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:06:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305441] redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261906.l8QJ62Zw015411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: redhat-artwork should be split up into multiple packages Alias: ArtworkSplit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305441 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |307801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:06:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] New: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gnome-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gnome-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rstrode.fedorapeople.org/bluecurve-gnome-theme/checkout/bluecurve-gnome-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Bluecurve GNOME meta theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:14:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nando at ccrma.stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper.spec SRPM URL: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/extras/sooperlooper-1.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: SooperLooper is a realtime software looping sampler in the spirit of Gibson's Echoplex Digital Pro. If used with a low-latency kernel and the proper audio buffer configuration it is capable of truly realtime live looping performance. (was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200941) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:41:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] New: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ebmunson at us.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/libvpd-1.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: A C++ Library used for accessing information collected by the program lsvpd. The lsvpd package also uses this library for storing the system vpd collection. A request to add lsvpd will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:43:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307901] New: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ebmunson at us.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/lsvpd.spec SRPM URL: http://superb-west.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/linux-diag/lsvpd-1.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: This utility lists device Vital Product Data (VPD), which includes the following information and more: vendor, version, revision level, serial number. This utility has been tested on ppc64, ppc, and i386 platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 19:52:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709261952.l8QJqrNT022306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 15:52 EST ------- You are still missing build dependencies on perl(Test::Pod) and perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) so you miss some test suite coverage; this changes the test results to: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=11, Tests=29, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.42 cusr + 0.15 csys = 0.57 CPU) It's good to have full test coverage but you don't seem to want to add those two bbuild dependencies for whatever reason so I won't block on it. The license field is fixed, so rpmlint is quiet. The following issue remains: X package version is not compliant with guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 20:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245708] Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262001.l8QK1CYp025075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scsi-target-utils - SCSI target daemon and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245708 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2007-09-26 16:01 EST ------- Ok, I can take it. I did a updated package with some style changes, can notting have a quick look and (hopefully) ack? SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/scsi-target-utils/scsi-target-utils-0.0-1.20070803snap.fc7.src.rpm You then have to set fedora-cvs to ? and say something like this: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: scsi-target-utils Change Owner To: terjeros Thanks for the nice work and quick reply! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 20:11:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262011.l8QKB0RR025992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 16:11 EST ------- This builds fine and rpmlint is clean; I'll run through the checklist as soon as I get home this evening. But unfortunately it doesn't run: ImportError: No module named pysolsoundserver This happens even if I pass --nosound. It looks like there's code to detect that the module isn't there (look for warn_pysolsoundserver) but the import isn't wrapped in a try block. When I get home I'll have to see if I can't hack it a bit. Or this could grow a dependency on the sound server, except that it would have to be a circular dependency, and in that case they should probably just be bundled together in one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 20:33:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248617] Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262033.l8QKXFju030639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcollect - Simple CD/DVD catalog for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248617 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2007-09-26 16:33 EST ------- imported and build set ExcludeArch: ppc64 as Mono doesn't exist there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 20:52:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262052.l8QKqiB2000672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-26 16:52 EST ------- Do you really need the %post and %postun update-desktop-database? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:02:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262102.l8QL2gnG002543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 17:02 EST ------- I made the change suggested in comment 5, fwiw (and the similar change for the kdm theme) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:01:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262101.l8QL1hba003239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-26 17:01 EST ------- GPL is not a valid value for the License-Tag, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 Afaik, these categories in the desktop file should not be used: X-Fedora Application And I guess these, too: X-PlanetCCRMA X-Digital_Processing X-Jack Maybe you want to add this category: Audio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:07:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262107.l8QL7TNd003506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 17:07 EST ------- or if we merge this with bluecurve-qt-engine, then this issue becomes moot. I'm still curious for opinions on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:06:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262106.l8QL6gb3003432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 17:06 EST ------- that's because configure has: KDE_SET_PREFIX KDE_CHECK_FINAL KDE_USE_QT AC_PATH_KDE to pull in $(kde_datadir) I don't know what those macros, I just copied it verbatim from redhat-artwork. For now i'll add the BuildRequires, but we might be able to trim that and drop the BuildReq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:11:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262111.l8QLBdd7004269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org 2007-09-26 17:11 EST ------- I've added a dependency on Test::Pod but not on Test::Pod::Coverage, as it built without, and made it rpmlint-clean, which I believe brings package version into compliance with guidelines. SPEC: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std.spec SRPM: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std-v0.0.4-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:14:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262114.l8QLEIOp004432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-26 17:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: higlayout Short Description: Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:15:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262115.l8QLFbYC005422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-26 17:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=207541) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=207541&action=view) Patches spelling of "Connecting" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:16:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262116.l8QLGHtF005600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:12:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262112.l8QLCSCS004820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-26 17:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > "BR: java-devel" should be replaced by "BR: java-javadoc" (even if sinjdoc > doesn't do crosslinked javadocs at the moment) - java-gcj-compat-devel provides > java-devel. Otherwise looks good to me, feel free to import and fix before the > first build. Nothing provides java-javadoc, thats why I put java-devel there, but you are right, that is the same as java-gcj-compat-devel. So I'll take that out before import. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:14:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262114.l8QLEktW004987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-26 17:14 EST ------- APPROVED, with following notes: - Dependency on glib2-devel unnecessary (pulled in by libsexy-devel) - Requires(post), Requires(postun), %post and %postun also unnecessary - Connecting is misspelled in upstream code and translation, patch attached. Please apply and forward to upstream. MUST ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK ? build dependencies complete: OK* ? locales handled using %find_lang: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: OK* ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:17:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305761] Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262117.l8QLHffM005743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:30:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] New: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 Product: Fedora Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chaffinmichael at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Yum on Fedora Core (release 6) only seems to find bzr-0.15 and I could not find updated versions of the RPM with a quick google search. I choose to download the bzr-0.15.fc6.src.rpm files and update to bzr 0.90 ... for the good of others I have attached a copy of the resulting SPEC files to this post. RPM is not my specialty but I use Fedora at work. I know that bzr.spec still needs a little help to handle the debug files that rpm 'unpackaged_file_*' macro does not like. ------- Additional Comments From chaffinmichael at gmail.com 2007-09-26 17:30 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=207621) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=207621&action=view) First cut at bzr 0.90 SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:34:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262134.l8QLYPw1007931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-26 17:34 EST ------- That's a good question. It's been traditionally called "fbreader" elsewhere, and the upstream tarball is called fbreader. Referring to Packaging/NamingGuidelines, #6: "While case sensitivity is not a mandatory requirement, case should only be used where necessary. Keep in mind to respect the wishes of the upstream maintainers." It's probably OK -- abiword is packaged the same way: $ ls /usr/bin/[A..Z]* /usr/bin/AbiWord-2.4 $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/AbiWord-2.4 abiword-2.4.6-6.fc8 $ rpm -ql abiword | grep Abi /usr/lib64/AbiWord-2.4 ... /usr/share/AbiSuite-2.4 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:32:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262132.l8QLWf27008422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-26 17:32 EST ------- fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:35:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308101] New: Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308101 Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 Product: Fedora Version: fc6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chaffinmichael at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Yum on Fedora Core (release 6) only seems to find bzrtools-0.15 and I could not find updated versions of the RPM with a quick google search. I choose to download the bzrtools-0.15.4-2fc6.src.rpm files and update to bzrtools 0.90 ... for the good of others I have attached a copy of the resulting SPEC files to this post. RPM is not my specialty but I use Fedora at work. ------- Additional Comments From chaffinmichael at gmail.com 2007-09-26 17:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=207671) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=207671&action=view) First cut at bzrtools 0.90 SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:46:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262146.l8QLkC6J010987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 ------- Additional Comments From nando at ccrma.stanford.edu 2007-09-26 17:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > GPL is not a valid value for the License-Tag, see: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-f21ae23bf2f278444e2c385463cfa74a502396b8 Thanks, changed to GPLv2+ (updated spec file linked above) > Afaik, these categories in the desktop file should not be used: > X-Fedora Application Do you have a reference by any chance on categories that should / should not be included in desktop files? In my fc6 machine I have 335 application desktop files. Of those that are not from Planet CCRMA origin: 185 have "Application;" in their category 84 have "X-Fedora;" in their category list A similar result happens in fc7. > And I guess these, too: > X-PlanetCCRMA > X-Digital_Processing > X-Jack I'd rather preserve X-Digital_Processing and X-Jack. With a full Planet CCRMA install the "Applications" -> "Sound & Video" is very very long. Planet CCRMA currently includes a separate menu tree (currently "Applications" -> "Planet CCRMA" but could be renamed if it ever becomes part of Fedora, of course) that further categorizes apps with the end result that the menu is actually usable to find and use applications. Leaving those categories in does not affect systems without the extra menu structure but makes the system much more usable in those that have it. > Maybe you want to add this category: > Audio This one does not seem to be very popular either, only 7 entries in my fc6 system (I'm not saying this is not the proper entry, only that it does not seem to be used). Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:47:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] New: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/quake3.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/quake3-1.34-0.2.rc4.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Quake 3 Arena engine. It comes with an applications menu entry, which will offer to download and install the Quake 3 demo datafiles for you. If you own a copy of quake 3, you will need to copy the pak?.pk3 files from the original 1.32 Quake 3 Arena point release as well as pak0.pk3 from the original CD-ROM to /usr/share/quake3/baseq3 or ~/.q3a/baseq3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 21:57:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262157.l8QLvJGl012619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-26 17:57 EST ------- Shame Matthias didn't pick that one up :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:00:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262200.l8QM0GPH013109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-26 18:00 EST ------- I'll review this tomorrow. Nag me if I don't :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:04:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262204.l8QM40ZH012407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-26 18:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Nothing provides java-javadoc $ rpm -q --whatprovides java-javadoc java-1.5.0-gcj-javadoc-1.5.0.0-14.fc7.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:01:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305761] Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262201.l8QM1IoY012221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme - Fedora Infinity screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305761 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 18:01 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost ~]$ rpm -qp --provides /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme = 1.0.0-1.fc8 package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: invalid license file: ok spec language: ok spec readability: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet buildability: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directory ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Please fix the license field, other than that it is fine. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:06:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262206.l8QM6YT4014131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:14:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308101] Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262214.l8QMEuGw015005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shahms at shahms.com Component|Package Review |bzrtools ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 18:14 EST ------- This really isn't a new package review. It's nice to help the maintainer by providing the already-updated specfile, but you need to file the bugs against the proper component (in this case, bzrutils) so that they'll see it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:18:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262218.l8QMIvNv014594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:17:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308101] Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262217.l8QMHaNP014515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308101 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:17:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305751] Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262217.l8QMH9HO014479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-gdm-theme - Fedora Infinity GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305751 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 18:17 EST ------- rpmlint is slient package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok language: ok readbility: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet builable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:24:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304331] Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262224.l8QMO9ph016302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304331 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 18:24 EST ------- It is not possible for this package to be part of Fedora as long as it depends on smpeg-devel, which is only in livna. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:29:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262229.l8QMTbBf017250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |308101 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:29:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308101] Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262229.l8QMTa1u017218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308101 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |308091 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-26 18:29 EST ------- I have a spec in cvs for devel that would be better used for upgrading this. But it depends on upgrading bzr. Please see the notes in Bug #308091 to decide whether we should do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:30:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262230.l8QMUF1j017640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-26 18:30 EST ------- Tried running this. I get #quake3-demo /usr/bin/quake3-demo: line 5: /usr/share/opengl-games-utils/opengl-game-functions.sh: No such file or directory #rpm -ql opengl-games-utils /usr/bin/opengl-game-wrapper.sh /usr/share/doc/opengl-games-utils-0.1 /usr/share/doc/opengl-games-utils-0.1/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:27:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262227.l8QMRS3u017094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-26 18:27 EST ------- Hi Michael, I've been hesitating to update FC6 because there are some radical changes between bzr-0.16 and bzr-0.91. Namely, some of the code has been rewritten in Pyrex and thus compiles to an arch specific module. For the three packages in Fedora, I'm able to update them all at once so they move from arch independent directories to arch specific directories together but external modules that people have compiled locally and placed in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/ would break on x86_64 machines. As a bzr user, what do you think is going to cause bzr users the least pain? Working with a slightly out-of-date version of bzr or having the upgrade break unpackaged plugins in this way? Note: I have 0.91 packaged in devel and could push the changes to both F-7 and FC-6. It's just, as I say, a question of whether out-of-datedness or possible breakage takes precedent here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 22:38:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262238.l8QMcag8018912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-26 18:38 EST ------- Commented out the lines and had a accept dialog box, license agreement and progress for downloads followed by this error File linuxq3ademo-1.11-6.x86.gz.sh not found on server(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:02:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197867] Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262302.l8QN2Sjb021030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iscsitarget (includes kernel module) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197867 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-26 19:02 EST ------- Hmm, now that FESCo has decided not to permit kernel modules at all, what's to become of this ticket? Will someone talk to the kernel folks to see if they'd be interested in adding the module portion to the kewnel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:08:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305771] Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262308.l8QN83mh023130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305771 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305771] Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262323.l8QNNiEZ025209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-screensaver-theme - Fedora screensaver theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305771 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 19:23 EST ------- rpmlint output: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/fedora-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm fedora-screensaver-theme.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL fedora-screensaver-theme.noarch: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/screensavers/system.desktop package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: see above, the desktop file should be fixed by adding a semicolon at the end of the Categories list license: ok license field: must be fixed license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Fix the license and the desktop file, then it is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262326.l8QNQGS7024583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From elliot at vmware.com 2007-09-26 19:26 EST ------- [Blargh, I need to get my fedorabugs access set up so I can close this myself. :] Given the Fedora policy, and the impossibility of complying with it just yet, it seems like this bug should be closed for now. And it's clear that there's more communication that needs to happen in general about the purpose behind and implementation of the modules, before they go upstream (thanks for the pointer to kernel-mentors, Dave). (Can anyone suggest a preferred "fringe" repository to try getting this package into in the meantime, so that users that really want the modules can get them? ATrpms/DAG/Dries/FreshRPMS/NewRPMS/Livna?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:33:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262333.l8QNXvth025690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2007-09-26 19:33 EST ------- One other point to note: I'm planning on updating F-7 to 0.91 because it fixes some problems with branching from repositories with tags that are present in 0.18. So this is just a question of whether to update FC-6 or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:45:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262345.l8QNjXe9001086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:43:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305651] Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262343.l8QNh9qV030779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorabubbles-gdm-theme - FedoraBubbles GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305651 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 19:43 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok nacro use: consistent content: permisssible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok The description could use some improvement, maybe say "was introduced in FC5" instead of "was shipped in FC5". Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 26 23:54:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304331] Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709262354.l8QNsUtE029469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304331 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-26 19:54 EST ------- I'll submit this package to livna, at the moment I'm working on a patch that will disable sound support when the sound server isn't installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 00:09:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270009.l8R09sC6006289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-26 20:09 EST ------- I've added a patch so that the sound option will be disabled if the pysol sound-server isn't found, but if it is then the option to enable sound will present itself. Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/pysol/pysol-4.82-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 00:11:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270011.l8R0BmIi006897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-26 20:11 EST ------- the new spec/srpm (1.1.0-2) were uploaded to Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-2.src.rpm the install directory was changed to /usr/share/fonts/wqy-unibit the relative path seems a little bit confusing to me because of %{buildroot}. so, for this update, I kept the absolute path. maybe in the future, if I get better understanding, I will correct this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 00:19:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] New: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz-1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz.spec Description: Lybniz is an easy to use mathematical function graph plotter using PyGTK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 00:33:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270033.l8R0XIEl009777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 ------- Additional Comments From ngompa13 at gmail.com 2007-09-26 20:33 EST ------- Does this use the latest ioQuake3 engine revision or is this just the original that came from id software (id Tech 3)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 00:45:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270045.l8R0jVP5004289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-26 20:45 EST ------- Would if be the following, because there is/will be only version 1.2 foreseeable? http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/taipeifonts-1.2.tar.gz BTW, BuildRoot was updated to the current recommendation: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070927_taipeifonts/taipeifonts-1.2-3.fc8.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070927_taipeifonts/taipeifonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:22:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270122.l8R1MSbD009919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-26 21:22 EST ------- All builds successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:22:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266941] Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270122.l8R1MTgf009944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Phing - A project build system based on Apache Ant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266941 Bug 266941 depends on bug 275231, which changed state. Bug 275231 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:42:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270142.l8R1g397020357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 21:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 816fc0f2322e23bdaf5968443b1cfab9 fbreader-sources-0.8.6d.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + Package fbreader-0.8.6d-2.fc8 -> Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libbz2.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libenca.so.0 libexpat.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libjpeg.so.62 libm.so.6 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpng12.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libz.so.1 libzlcore.so.0.8.6d libzltext.so.0.8.6d rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides: libzlcore.so.0.8.6d libzltext.so.0.8.6d zlui-gtk.so + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:49:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270149.l8R1nOGE021211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:49:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305661] Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270149.l8R1n6lk013657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-gdm-theme - FedoraDNA GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305661 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 21:49 EST ------- rpmlint is silent maybe change the description to say "was first shipped in FC6" package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok legibility: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:52:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270152.l8R1qCBJ014281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-26 21:52 EST ------- OK I'll do it that way, thanks for your help Kevin. All builds successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:52:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 256521] Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270152.l8R1qE3f014361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Creole - A database abstraction layer for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=256521 Bug 256521 depends on bug 275211, which changed state. Bug 275211 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:52:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266821] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270152.l8R1qEnI014337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_runtime - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266821 Bug 266821 depends on bug 275211, which changed state. Bug 275211 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 01:52:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266801] Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270152.l8R1qDOc014313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266801 Bug 266801 depends on bug 275211, which changed state. Bug 275211 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 02:03:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270203.l8R23DgK015939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-26 22:03 EST ------- Sounds perfectly reasonable. Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/aldrin.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/aldrin-0.11-5.fc7.src.rpm Fixed issues: - nailed to pyzzub version 0.2.3 for docpath compatibility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 02:19:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270219.l8R2JfGB018613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-26 22:19 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (aldrin) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 02:42:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305701] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270242.l8R2gFwB022545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-gdm-theme - FedoraFlyingHigh GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305701 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 22:42 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec readability: ok upstream source: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 02:50:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270250.l8R2oA87030766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 22:50 EST ------- The package is not there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 02:57:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307891] libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270257.l8R2vGJ5031925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 22:57 EST ------- Looks this is your first package and you need SPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:14:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270314.l8R3E6nS002156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:16:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305641] Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270316.l8R3G06N002801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305641 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:15:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270315.l8R3Fffd002752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-26 23:15 EST ------- new URLs are: http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python-0.1.3-1.fc7.src.rpm http://groups.google.com/group/scim-python/web/scim-python.spec-4 Fix koji build problems. Update tarball to 0.1.3. It has been tested in koji. Install *.so in the %{_libdir}/scim-1.0/1.4.0/*/ . Please recheck it. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:27:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270327.l8R3R7JO004576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 23:27 EST ------- Can we have some different wording in Summary? Good to have examples in t installed as part of -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:36:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305641] Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270336.l8R3aDA3031756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-xmms-skin - Bluecurve xmms skin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305641 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 23:36 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/bluecurve-xmms-skin-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm bluecurve-xmms-skin.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: must be fixed license file: ok spec language: ok spec readability: ok upstream source :no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: I assume /usr/share/xmms/Skins is owned by xmms, so ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved. Just fix the license field -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:40:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286691] Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270340.l8R3eMef032346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgssglue - renaming libgssapi to libgssglue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286691 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-26 23:40 EST ------- Fine. Though I am not happy with "not updating SPEC changelog and providing new SRPM each time SPEC got some noticeable changes", as per your wish I am approving this package here. You should have added at least review bug number in changelog if you preferred not to update release. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. ce1b4c758e6de01b712d154c5c97e540 libgssglue-0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libgssglue.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Package libgssglue-0.1-2.fc8 -> Provides: config(libgssglue) = 0.1-2.fc8 libgssglue.so.1 libgssglue.so.1(HIDDEN) libgssglue.so.1(libgssapi_CITI_2) Requires: config(libgssglue) = 0.1-2.fc8 krb5-libs >= 1.5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libgssglue.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Package libgssglue-devel-0.1-2.fc8 -> Requires: libgssglue = 0.1-2.fc8 libgssglue.so.1 pkgconfig + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:45:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225733] Merge Review: eruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270345.l8R3jqKB007235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: eruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225733 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-26 23:45 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing. the updated package has been built on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 03:51:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270351.l8R3p7cC001389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-26 23:51 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legibility: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 04:03:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305671] Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270403.l8R43sYX009504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305671 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 04:08:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270408.l8R48nHI003460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 00:08 EST ------- Need some updates in SPEC 1) Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) You can use --delete-original in desktop-file-install command and remove following line rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop 3)rpmlint on SRPM gave me lybniz.src: W: strange-permission lybniz-startup.sh 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 4) I don't see any use of CFLAGS. You can remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 04:14:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270414.l8R4E2Pi010840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-27 00:14 EST ------- Made the changes - Here's the updated pacakge: Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz-1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 04:13:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305671] Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270413.l8R4DqCR004161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoradna-kdm-theme - FedoraDNA KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305671 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 00:13 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec readability: ok upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: ok ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 04:47:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270447.l8R4lwI0008636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-27 00:47 EST ------- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070927_fonts-chinese/fonts-chinese-3.03-11.fc8.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070927_fonts-chinese/fonts-chinese.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 05:10:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270510.l8R5AGdR011748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 01:10 EST ------- Source URL is not working. Actually it should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/lybniz2/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 05:14:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270514.l8R5E4Yd018708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |bzr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 05:15:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270515.l8R5FOPm019266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 01:15 EST ------- installed package but desktop file is not working as Exec=lybniz.py is not in installed path and actual main executable program is lybniz so it should be Exec=lybniz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 05:23:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270523.l8R5NdYp013322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-09-27 01:23 EST ------- Skip the Requires: gd > 2, rpm automatically does the dep for libgd. GPL is no longer a valid license, you have to specify the version, looks like v2. Looking very good otherwise, builds fine on devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 05:44:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304341] Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270544.l8R5i1Ru016084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304341 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 01:44 EST ------- This should probably go to livna as well if the sound server isn't going to be in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 06:54:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270654.l8R6shHO025126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 02:54 EST ------- looks ok to me this new SRPM for i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 07:56:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270756.l8R7uHvw009328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-27 03:56 EST ------- Improved. Spec File: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/man-pages-ja/man-pages-ja.spec SRPM File: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/man-pages-ja/man-pages-ja-20070915-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 08:04:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270804.l8R84aTQ010748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 kms at passback.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kms at passback.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From kms at passback.co.uk 2007-09-27 04:04 EST ------- > I'd rather preserve X-Digital_Processing and X-Jack. With a full Planet CCRMA > install the "Applications" -> "Sound & Video" is very very long. Planet CCRMA > currently includes a separate menu tree (currently "Applications" -> "Planet > CCRMA" but could be renamed if it ever becomes part of Fedora, of course) that > further categorizes apps with the end result that the menu is actually usable to > find and use applications. Leaving those categories in does not affect systems > without the extra menu structure but makes the system much more usable in those > that have it. I think that we need to consider how the "Sound & Video" menu will be structured as more Planet CCRMA applications are migrated to Fedora. I have a large number of applications from Planet CCRMA installed on F7 and the "Sound & Video" menu is unusable - the Planet CCRMA menu provides a much better structure. I guess a new bug should be opened for the menu issue - against which component? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 08:14:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270814.l8R8ERZK004657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-27 04:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Shame Matthias didn't pick that one up :/ I've contacted him about this review requested and offered him co-maintainer ship. (In reply to comment #3) > Tried running this. I get > > #quake3-demo > > /usr/bin/quake3-demo: line 5: > /usr/share/opengl-games-utils/opengl-game-functions.sh: No such file or directory > > #rpm -ql opengl-games-utils > > /usr/bin/opengl-game-wrapper.sh > /usr/share/doc/opengl-games-utils-0.1 > /usr/share/doc/opengl-games-utils-0.1/README > Thats because you have an old opengl-games-utils, which has only been in rawhide for 1 day, do "yum update opengl-games-utils", Since the not working version has only been in rawhide I don't feel inclined to make the Requires versioned. (In reply to comment #4) > Commented out the lines and had a accept dialog box, license agreement and > progress for downloads followed by this error > > File linuxq3ademo-1.11-6.x86.gz.sh not found on server(s). Thats because the id software ftp server sometimes gives a to many users error. I could not find any mirrors for this file. I've just tried searching a little bit harder and now I have several good mirrors. I'll do a new package with an updated quake3.autodlrc file with better mirrors. (In reply to comment #5) > Does this use the latest ioQuake3 engine revision or is this just the original > that came from id software (id Tech 3)? It uses the latest ioquake (something which you could have found out yourself with one click on the spec file link). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 09:36:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270936.l8R9a7Rp017729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 05:36 EST ------- I think you should preserve timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 09:35:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270935.l8R9ZRbH017451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 09:35:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294321] Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270935.l8R9ZSTS017500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools - Open Source VMware Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294321 Bug 294321 depends on bug 294341, which changed state. Bug 294341 Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 09:38:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709270938.l8R9cY0r025500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2007-09-27 05:38 EST ------- Elliot, I've closed the bug for you, I hope you agree on the resolution. I would have suggested rpmfusion as alternate repo, but since the review rules are mostly the same, I am not sure it can be included over there, either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 10:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271035.l8RAZrxJ026576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-09-27 06:35 EST ------- In addition: livna will of course take the kmods and from there we'll make it easy to move them to rpmfusion later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 10:35:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294341] Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271035.l8RAZ6CZ026491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: open-vm-tools-kmods - Kernel modules for open-vm-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294341 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2007-09-27 06:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #36) > > I would have suggested rpmfusion as alternate repo, but since the review rules > are mostly the same, I am not sure it can be included over there, either. The "mostly" here is the point; packages with kernel modules will be allowed in rpmfusion, but we are not 100% sure yet how to package them. A mix/combination of kmods and dkms seems likely to me ATM. But rpmfusion needs to get it's infra running first before we take care of that problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:06:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271106.l8RB6Zqm006129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 07:06 EST ------- Also +1 from me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:24:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271124.l8RBOv8n001012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 07:24 EST ------- cool thanks mtasaka. Phuang, Can you please Update working Source URL please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:31:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271131.l8RBV5lJ009789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-27 07:31 EST ------- Ok, here is a new version with a much better mirrorlist for the quake demo files, this (+ "yum update opengl-games-utils) should fix the reported problems: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/quake3.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/quake3-1.34-0.3.rc4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:35:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271135.l8RBZNZm002853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-27 07:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Nothing provides java-javadoc > > $ rpm -q --whatprovides java-javadoc > java-1.5.0-gcj-javadoc-1.5.0.0-14.fc7.x86_64 > Your right, I could swear I tried "yum install java-javadoc" after getting an rpmbuild BuildRequires error for it and yum didn't do anything, ah well, I will fix this before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:38:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253781] Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271138.l8RBcLTC010627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: outerspace - client for 4x on-line strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253781 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(qark at ospace.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 07:38 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271137.l8RBbfpV003113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 07:37 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:40:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271140.l8RBesJT011266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 07:40 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 11:54:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271154.l8RBsIZs012881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-27 07:54 EST ------- The tarball has been uploaded. Thanks everybody. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:10:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271210.l8RCAUQ8008352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-27 08:10 EST ------- The place to look when deciding what to do with the Categories field in a .desktop file is: http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Notice that there are main categories and sub categories. An application must always have atleast one main category, and may have as many subcategories as one one wants. In the case of audio applications, there also is this note in the table: Audio An audio application Desktop entry must include AudioVideo as well So the minimal Categories field for an audio app is: Categories=AudioVideo;Audio; Notice no Application!, Application is not a valid Category. If you want to further give hints for the menus what kind of application this is , the following sub categories are candidates: Midi An app related to MIDI Mixer Just a mixer Sequencer A sequencer Tuner A tuner TV A TV application AudioVideoEditing Application to edit audio/video files Player Application to play audio/video files Recorder Application to record audio/video files If that is not fine grained enough using X-foo Categories is a good solution. As for adding some kinda finer grained menu for Audio stuff, take a look at the games-menus package, that already does that for the Games menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:07:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271207.l8RC7jUD007790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 08:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM but not for RPM. scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine/scim-python-engine.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. scim-python.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/SetupUI/scim-python-setup.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/scim.so Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. I think this should not be blocker as absolute path looks correct for Fedora. + source files match upstream. 70acce6fc5e343cc0644c81f2092b9a1 scim-python-0.1.3.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package scim-python-0.1.3-1.fc8 -> Provides: scim.so scim.so(SCIM_0.1) Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 libscim-1.0.so.8 libscim-1.0.so.8(LIBSCIM_1.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libutil.so.1 pygtk2 python(abi) = 2.5 python-enchant rtld(GNU_HASH) scim + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:19:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271219.l8RCJ3dv009365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 phuang at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-27 08:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scim-python Short Description: Python wrapper for Smart Common Input Method platform. Owners: phuang Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:26:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304341] Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271226.l8RCQCvk010673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304341 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:44:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253024] Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271244.l8RCiduL020833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makehuman - Modeling of three-dimensional humanoid characters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253024 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 08:44 EST ------- Please rebuild also on F-7, FC-6 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:43:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271243.l8RCh4VG020759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-27 08:43 EST ------- Which one are you talking about? Since the original man pages are encoded in EUC-JP and we want to see the Japanese man pages in UTF-8, it's being converted at the build time. the content itself is the same though, actually it's the different files IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:45:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271245.l8RCjgfR013605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command Alias: ntop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219025 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bjohnson at symetrix. | |com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 08:45 EST ------- Any news on this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:47:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271247.l8RCl2sf021509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 08:47 EST ------- Please rebuild this on koji, on devel and F-7 repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:49:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271249.l8RCn5Wj021637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(anderson.silva at red | |hat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 08:49 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:50:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271250.l8RCo6Vs014499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 08:50 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:47:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271247.l8RClxHb013866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 08:47 EST ------- I think we should once close this bug. Any comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:51:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271251.l8RCpjDs022424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-27 08:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aldrin Short Description: Modular music sequencer/tracker Owners: akahl Branches: F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 12:56:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251128] Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271256.l8RCu3nN023189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Script - Cross-platform basic tests for scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251128 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.02-2 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:06:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271306.l8RD6rQQ024805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 Bug 215569 depends on bug 227309, which changed state. Bug 227309 Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:06:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271306.l8RD6pfe024776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2007-09-27 09:06 EST ------- Agreed. If someone else wants to pick up the ball and run with it, they're more than welcome, but for now, closing bug WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271311.l8RDBokD025555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-27 09:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Can we have some different wording in Summary? Do you have a better idea? This summary is from upstream's spec that is in the tarball. > Good to have examples in t installed as part of -devel package. Done. SPEC: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX.spec SRPM: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX-1.10.1-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:22:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 215569] Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271322.l8RDM7Zd019755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-vidcap - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager video capture utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215569 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227309 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:22:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227309] Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271322.l8RDM5Ma019715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seom - Desktop video capture and playback utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227309 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778, 215569 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 09:22 EST ------- Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:43:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271343.l8RDhL4l030766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 09:43 EST ------- Sorry for delay. It seems that 0.5.1 is already released. So would you update first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:49:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271349.l8RDn3ua031704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-27 09:49 EST ------- there now, sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:49:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271349.l8RDnLCq031804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(frank- | |buettner at gmx.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-27 09:49 EST ------- Well, no reviewers for almost 3 months, so: Frank, would you still want to have your package reviewed? If so, I will try to check your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 13:58:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271358.l8RDwglU001199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2007-09-27 09:58 EST ------- Doesn't this package contain trademarked icons?(In reply to comment #2) > APPROVED, with following notes: > - Connecting is misspelled in upstream code and translation, patch attached. > Please apply and forward to upstream. Don't bother forwarding that patch to upstream, since we're doing a complete rewrite for the next version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:04:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271404.l8RE4Mg0002171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 andy.southgate at mushware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: adanaxisgpl |Review Request: adanaxisgpl |- FPS game in 4 spatial |- FPS game in 4 spatial |dimensions |dimensions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:02:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 309061] New: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy.southgate at mushware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.mushware.com/files/adanaxisgpl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.mushware.com/files/adanaxisgpl-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Adanaxis is a fast-moving first person shooter set in deep space, where the fundamentals of space itself are changed. By adding another dimension to space this game provides an environment with movement in four directions and six planes of rotation. Initially the game explains the 4D control system via a graphical sequence, before moving on to 30 levels of gameplay with numerous enemy, ally, weapon and mission types. Features include simulated 4D texturing, mouse and joystick control, and original music. Information, reviews and movies can be found at: http://www.mushware.com/ (Developer site - me) http://www.linuxgamingworld.com/2007/07/adanaxis http://happypenguin.org/show?Adanaxis This is the GPL'd version of the full commercial game. It's stripped of material that can't be GPL'd, but it's not a demo - it does contain all of the levels and has no artificial limitations. You will need hardware 3D acceleration to meaningfully test the game. This is my first Fedora package an I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:13:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227052] Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271413.l8REDeE6028519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227052 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2007-09-27 10:13 EST ------- build failure on rawhide: + ant -Dbuild.compiler=modern Buildfile: build.xml init.work.dirs: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/dist [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/release [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/temp [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/tools/classes [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/classes [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/srcgen [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/res [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/ant/classes init: [echo] ANT version: Apache Ant version 1.7.0 compiled on August 16 2007 [echo] JDK version: 1.6 [echo] build debug flag: on -timestamp.1: -timestamp.2: [echo] build id: 2.0.8127 (unsupported private build) -timestamp.2a: -timestamp.3: build.cvs.ready: -timestamp.4: -timestamp.5: [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/srcgen [copy] Copying 1 file to /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/temp timestamp: -pre-compile: core.bootstrap.compile: [javac] Compiling 2 source files to /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/classes [javac] [javac] WARNING [javac] [javac] The -source switch defaults to 1.5 in JDK 1.5 and 1.6. [javac] If you specify -target 1.2 you now must also specify -source 1.2. [javac] Ant will implicitly add -source 1.2 for you. Please change your build file. core.java14.compile: [javac] Compiling 1 source file to /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/classes [javac] [javac] WARNING [javac] [javac] The -source switch defaults to 1.5 in JDK 1.5 and 1.6. [javac] If you specify -target 1.2 you now must also specify -source 1.2. [javac] Ant will implicitly add -source 1.2 for you. Please change your build file. core.java13.compile: [javac] Compiling 1 source file to /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/classes [javac] [javac] WARNING [javac] [javac] The -source switch defaults to 1.5 in JDK 1.5 and 1.6. [javac] If you specify -target 1.2 you now must also specify -source 1.2. [javac] Ant will implicitly add -source 1.2 for you. Please change your build file. core.compile: [javac] Compiling 165 source files to /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/out/core/classes [javac] [javac] WARNING [javac] [javac] The -source switch defaults to 1.5 in JDK 1.5 and 1.6. [javac] If you specify -target 1.2 you now must also specify -source 1.2. [javac] Ant will implicitly add -source 1.2 for you. Please change your build file. [javac] /home/rkastl/rpmbuild/BUILD/emma-2.0.5312/core/java12/com/vladium/emma/rt/InstrClassLoader.java:346: reference to CodeSource is ambiguous, both method CodeSource(java.net.URL,java.security.cert.Certificate[]) in java.security.CodeSource and method CodeSource(java.net.URL,java.security.CodeSigner[]) in java.security.CodeSource match [javac] final CodeSource csrc = new CodeSource (srcURL, null); [javac] ^ [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. [javac] 1 error BUILD FAILED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271421.l8RELQ0f030098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-27 10:21 EST ------- Filed bug 309091 for the qt issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:29:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271429.l8RETmNJ006884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-27 10:29 EST ------- That's the upstream matter. I'm not quite sure if upstream agrees with changing them - at least it won't happens on the stable release - because a lot of the extension libraries are following it. If that's one of the requirements to pass through this review, I don't think I can do anything at this moment. I'll work on other packaging issue though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:31:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271431.l8REV88J031866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2007-09-27 10:31 EST ------- I can confirm that this fixes the two problems outlined earlier. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:28:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271428.l8RESVic031240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:38:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271438.l8REcH1o008354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-27 10:38 EST ------- So I talked to Matthias about this a bit today. The consensus is we'll have all the theme packages own /usr/share/themes/Bluecurve. We think that's probably better than a circular dependency or bluecurve-filesystem... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 14:57:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271457.l8REvSDi011202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 anderson.silva at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(anderson.silva at red| |hat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-27 10:57 EST ------- Alright guys... I finally got a few minutes to address some of the issues discussed above. First, let me thank everyone for helping me out with this. Here are the updated spec/src: http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-7.src.rpm What I have fixed: * Thu Sep 27 2007 Anderson Silva 2.1.1-7 - Changed /etc to %%{_sysconfdir} - Fixed reference on postun section - Using tarball as Source0 - Added require rpm-build - Removed require for textutils, fileutils - Added directories to belong to package I still have 2 questions/comments: 1. About Comment #19: 'You probably should check for presence of %{_sysconfir}/popt before sed'ing, because it might not be present (user could have deleted it).' There is a if statement that checks to see if the file exists before running the sed. 2. About Comment #16: '* %_libdir vs noarch - This package is marked as noarch, however %files list use %_libdir, which differs between on 32bit arch and on 64bit arch' OK, this is one problem that I am not sure how to solve. What do you guys suggest? Should I contact upstream and ask them to change their project to lay out their shell scripts somewhere else in the system? Which location what that be outside /usr/lib? I think they put it there, because the rpm package layout their stuff there too. Should I make this rpm i386 only? even though in theory it should work on 64bit arch? I am open to suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:01:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236488] Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271501.l8RF15Jp004394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236488 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:01 EST ------- Builds fine. However, you do need to specify GPL version now, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Looks like 2 and later, from a source file. Remove the Requires: gtk2 as rpm can figure that out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:18:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271518.l8RFIhUa014666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:18 EST ------- Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:20:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241304] Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271520.l8RFK19q007486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBI-Dumper - Dump data from a DBI datasource to file Alias: perl-DBI-Dumper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241304 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:20 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:26:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271526.l8RFQ51N016326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:26 EST ------- Is there any update or should I go with comment #4 package for review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:31:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271531.l8RFVVXi009920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 ------- Additional Comments From chaffinmichael at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:31 EST ------- Thank you for the quick response time. The fact that a 'rev bump' bug has not been submitted to date should answer your question, 'working with a slightly out-of-date version or upgrade break' ... go with the out-of-date version and close this bug. On the other side of the fence it looks to fix some pretty important bugs (cherry picked list of bugs), * 0.16rc2 2007-04-30 * Handle the case when you delete a file, and then rename another file on top of it. Also handle the case of ``bzr rm --keep foo``. ``bzr status`` should show the removed file and an unknown file in its place. (John Arbash Meinel, #109993) * Also handle when you rename a file and create a file where it used to be. (John Arbash Meinel, #110256) * 0.17rc1 2007-06-12 * Merge no longer fails when a file is renamed in one tree and deleted in the other. (Aaron Bentley, #110279) * 0.17 2007-06-18 * Fix crash of commit due to wrong lookup of filesystem encoding. (Colin Watson, #120647) * 0.18rc1 2007-07-10 * Work around python-2.4.1 inhability to correctly parse the authentication header. (Vincent Ladeuil, #121889) * Fix commit ordering in corner case (Aaron Bentley, #94975) * Make annotate behave in a non-ASCII world (Adeodato Sim?). Me, I am new to Bazaar and I am trying to test it at my company ... so I will suffer no upgrade breakage. I choose to roll the new SPEC file because I had some problems with the 'rm' and 'mv' above as well as tag's in the tree. I did submit the same SPEC file to the Bazaar mailing list, I am not a member so it's waiting in some queue somewhere. Maybe the best thing is to see how many people respond to the Bazaar mailing list post? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:45:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258001] Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271545.l8RFj4R8012105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyevent - python bindings for libevent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258001 johnp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(johnp at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From johnp at redhat.com 2007-09-27 11:45 EST ------- Sorry looking into it. Not sure how python distutils should handle this since upstream doesn't use autotools templates here. I want to do a correct patch and send it upstream, not some quick hack. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:44:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271544.l8RFiYlO011717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 11:44 EST ------- Hmm, yes, that hack works. A few issues cropped up in testing, though: One, which I don't think is a blocker but is annoying, is that when you start pysol from the command line you get a bunch of spew: Error loading plugin /usr/share/pysol/games/acesup.py: duplicate game ID 903 Error loading plugin /usr/share/pysol/games/auldlangsyne.py: duplicate game ID 172 [etc...] I thought it was loading both the uncompiled and compiled versions of each file, but I deleted the .py[oc] files and it still happens. Another issue is that I can't pick many of the games; for example, Baker's Dozen just gives me a dialog (that I can't paste from, damn it) containing: Internal error. Please report this bug: : unbound method startGame() must be called with CastlesInSpain instance as first argument (got BakersDozen instance instead) Perhaps it's related to the previous issue. There are also a couple of review issues: Source: tags should be URLs if possible. I don't see where pysol-4.82.tar.bz2 comes from, though; upstream only has the -src tarball. Where'd you get it? Might as well tack a period onto the end of %description. Review: ? can't check if source files match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (could use a period, I guess). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pysol = 4.82-5.fc8 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env tcl tix tk tkinter X Manual testing shows many issues. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop file looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:52:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271552.l8RFqkfj020935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Can we have some different wording in Summary? > > Do you have a better idea? This summary is from upstream's spec that is in the > tarball. > Not really. But I thought summary does not tell whats purpose of this package. anyway if upstream follows it then we also use the same then. > > Good to have examples in t installed as part of -devel package. > > Done. > > SPEC: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX.spec > SRPM: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/libHX-1.10.1-2.fc7.src.rpm thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 15:56:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271556.l8RFu8kt021831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 11:56 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. ae2c7ac182a03e589fd45a7867177a0a libHX-1.10.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libHX.pc files are present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + libHX package -> Requires: libHX.so.10 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides: libHX.so.10 + libHX-devel package -> Requires: libHX = 1.10.1-1.fc8 libHX.so.10 pkgconfig + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:08:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271608.l8RG89jV023761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-27 12:08 EST ------- Thank you very much for this fast review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libHX Short Description: General-purpose library Owners: till Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:26:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271626.l8RGQFI0026884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-27 12:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:28:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271628.l8RGSP03027105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-27 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271630.l8RGUAGF027604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-27 12:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:27:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271627.l8RGR3fP026932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-27 12:27 EST ------- I think I have fixed everything now: http://buildsys.zero42.at/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11075 [oliver at gosa alpha]$ rpmlint aboot-1.0-0.1.pre20040408.fc8.alpha.rpm [oliver at gosa alpha]$ Please note. I've added a patch to include the rpm optflags... I don't know if the package is *working*. But next time I boot my as1000a i will install updated aboot and try... I don't think that the optflags will break anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:31:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271631.l8RGVsPH028034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-27 12:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:45:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271645.l8RGj8Vm025485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-27 12:45 EST ------- rpmlint output is empty. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. A couple of files aren't pure GPL, but look compatible: ./code/client/snd_adpcm.c ./code/qcommon/unzip.c ./code/game/bg_lib.c Those 2 files from libjpeg mention libjpeg's README for licensing. Might be a good idea to keep it in the tarball: ./code/jpeg-6/jmemnobs.c ./code/renderer/jpeg_memsrc.c - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. "If you own a copy of quake 3" should probably be "Quake 3" as used in the rest of the text. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK The only thing I'd change is have a "shadow" file for the commercial pk3 files when they're installed in /usr/share/quake3/baseq3. Approved with the non-removal of the libjpeg README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:46:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271646.l8RGkEov031293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(frank- | |buettner at gmx.net) | ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-27 12:46 EST ------- Yes, I will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 16:59:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271659.l8RGxUJD000777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 12:59 EST ------- If it still shows up with a 'v' in the version then it doesn't meet the guidelines. Perhaps I'm just not being clear with my descriptions of the problems, so I'll attach a patch against your specfile and you can check out what changes I'm talking about: Change version to just "0.0.4". Change Source0: to put the 'v' in so the upstream tarball can still be found. Add BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) Change %setup macro to put the 'v' in so the untarred directory can still be found. Fix up the changelog to match the non-'v' version. Of course, if you apply this you'll want to bump the release and add a new changelog entry for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:00:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271700.l8RH0xDN028067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 13:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=208711) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=208711&action=view) Patch to fix specfile issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:20:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271720.l8RHKh75005279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 ------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org 2007-09-27 13:20 EST ------- Added Test::Pod::Coverage, changed version number correctly. SPEC: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std.spec SRPM: http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Config-Std-0.0.4-6.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:32:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271732.l8RHWjAP007016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2007-09-27 13:32 EST ------- A few more comments. The quake3-demo script doesn't work if you already have directories there (I had some old install on this machine): + mv quake3-latest-pk3s/baseq3 quake3-latest-pk3s/missionpack . mv: cannot move `quake3-latest-pk3s/baseq3' to `./baseq3': Directory not empty mv: cannot move `quake3-latest-pk3s/missionpack' to `./missionpack': Directory not empty And "posess" should be "possess" in the autodlrc (although "own" is probably better in this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271739.l8RHdOVi002080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount) Alias: libHX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2007-09-27 13:39 EST ------- Build for devel was successful. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=19734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:56:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271756.l8RHuxTc011392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307801] Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271759.l8RHxDbk005777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gnome-theme - Bluecurve GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307801 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 13:59 EST ------- I had the entire review written down here, but failed to commit. I'm not going to type it all again; it was all ok, except for the license field and the capitalization of the description. Approved, if those are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 17:57:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271757.l8RHvAoe005607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-27 13:57 EST ------- Thanks for the review! I'll fix the mentioned issues before import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quake3 Short Description: Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-7 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:13:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307171] Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271813.l8RID7jK014570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kdm-theme - Bluecurve KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307171 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:13 EST ------- rpmlint is silent package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok readable: yes upstream sources: no upstream yet buildable: yes ExcludeArch: n/a BRs: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok %files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: permissible large docs: n/a %doc: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel package: n/a libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a directories: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:14:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229416] Review Request: qpidj - qpid java implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271814.l8RIEHHM008717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qpidj - qpid java implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229416 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(rafaels at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:14 EST ------- I'm closing the review request, this will be repackaged differently at a later time to solve some of the issues mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:23:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305531] Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271823.l8RINiH6016259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gdm-theme - Bluecurve GDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305531 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:23 EST ------- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:22:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305511] Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271822.l8RIMpQn010531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-classic-metacity-theme - Bluecurve classic metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305511 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:22 EST ------- indeed, approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:27:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271827.l8RIRMpv016988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:27 EST ------- I don't have an opinion on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:29:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271829.l8RITgx9011762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 14:29 EST ------- OK, cool. rpmlint shuts up, the COPYING file is in there, the manpages aren't executable, and the version looks good. Of course you know I can't test this so I'll leave that to you; if the compiler flag change breaks things then I have no issues with you reverting it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:33:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271833.l8RIXFDP017882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:33 EST ------- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:34:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305731] Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271834.l8RIYYCm017949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-gnome-theme - Fedora GNOME theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305731 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:34 EST ------- All looks fine now, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 18:31:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305621] Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271831.l8RIVvn8012342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-metacity-theme - Bluecurve metacity theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305621 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 14:31 EST ------- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 19:23:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271923.l8RJNaDL026859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2007-09-27 15:23 EST ------- Ok, just don't build org.eclipse.dstore.extra package natively (aot-compile-rpm --exclude). Now the package seems to be good to be in. Spec: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eclipse-rse.spec SRPM: http://alcapcom.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eclipse-rse-2.0.1-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 19:29:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271929.l8RJTxng021652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2007-09-27 15:29 EST ------- All builds successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 19:37:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244948] Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271937.l8RJbHSA023269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Std - Yet Another Way of Storing Configuration Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244948 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 15:37 EST ------- OK, rpmlint is quiet, the version looks good. All the issues I had with this package are fixed. APPROVED Now on to perl-Business-CreditCard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 19:56:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271956.l8RJujFi001201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e | |du) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 19:57:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709271957.l8RJvEHE001252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 15:57 EST ------- I have a little time; let's start with the rpmlint output: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 20:06:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272006.l8RK6hiM029076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e| |du) | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2007-09-27 16:06 EST ------- Either way works, but it seems a wee bit silly to me for bluecurve-kde-theme to include only 2 text config files... so, slight preference to merging bluecurve-qt-engine here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 20:10:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272010.l8RKAmtv029587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 16:10 EST ------- Oops. Let's try that again: emacs-bbdb.src: W: spelling-error-in-description recieved received Funny rpmlint, but correct. emacs-bbdb.src: W: invalid-license GPL The license needs some adjusting to meet the current guidelines. I believe the proper tag for this package is "GPLv2+" according to the comment block at the head of bbdb.el emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/bbdb.info.gz emacs-bbdb.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/ChangeLog A quick call to iconv should fix these up. emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-cid.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl5" emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-unlazy-lock.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" emacs-bbdb.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/emacs-bbdb-2.35/utils/bbdb-srv.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" Even though these are packaged as documentation, it would still be nice if these were fixed up with some quick calls to sed. emacs-bbdb-el.noarch: W: no-documentation This is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 20:29:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272029.l8RKTSwt032144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 brcha at gna.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brcha at gna.org ------- Additional Comments From brcha at gna.org 2007-09-27 16:29 EST ------- Just for the record, here is the amd64 package for the domino style: http://brcha.no-ip.org/repo/RPMS/x86_64/kde-style-domino-0.4-2.f7.x86_64.rpm Btw, Goorah, I think that kde-style-* and gnome-style-* are good and descriptive names for various styles. If that is the case, I can do a yum list 'kde-style-*' and get all styles for kde that are available. Otherwise, I would either have to know exactly what I am looking for (such as domino) or use some GUI package manager to find an appropriate group for the KDE styles. Brcha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 20:39:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272039.l8RKd37v001109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-27 16:39 EST ------- works for me, i'll make that change -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 20:42:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303141] Package for python gdl bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272042.l8RKgwon001732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package for python gdl bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303141 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbarnes at redhat.com Component|Package Review |gnome-python2-extras ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 16:42 EST ------- There's essentially no chance that the gnome-python2-extras maintainer will see this as long as it's filed as a new package review. Let me change the component and CC the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 20:50:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272050.l8RKocL8010145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-27 16:50 EST ------- Done - Updated package: Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz-1.3-3.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 22:03:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246150] Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272203.l8RM3hdx021700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: dynamips - Powerful Cisco IOS Emulator/Hypervisor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246150 mmcgrath at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mmcgrath at redhat.com 2007-09-27 18:03 EST ------- I've contacted some people to see if we can get Cisco to release the firmware or even a templated or dummy firmware that we can ship with the package. Stay tuned for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 22:46:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272246.l8RMkGDg021422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-27 18:46 EST ------- I got the sources from the OpenSuSE SRPM package, as it apparently used to be on the PySol website but now it's gone (For example see http://www.happypenguin.org/show?PySol-Cardsets) I have the feelings the duplicate GameID problem will take a while as I have to filter thought each file - Is it a blocker or can I work on this later once the packages is submitted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 22:59:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195311] Review Request: coolkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272259.l8RMxSE9023125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coolkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195311 rrelyea at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2007-09-27 18:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: coolkey Updated Fedora Owners: rrelyea at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 23:08:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291091] Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272308.l8RN8xua031252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abyssinica-fonts - SIL Abyssinica fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291091 bernie at codewiz.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bernie at codewiz.org 2007-09-27 19:08 EST ------- Import and build done. Thanks to all you for guiding me through my first Fedora package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 23:17:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244947] Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272317.l8RNHsGF026152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Business-CreditCard - Validate/generate credit card checksums/names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244947 ------- Additional Comments From david at fetter.org 2007-09-27 19:17 EST ------- Created new .spec file with license fixed. rpmlint no longer complains. http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Business-CreditCard.spec http://fetter.org/rpm/perl-Business-CreditCard-0.30-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 23:50:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272350.l8RNovID004511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 19:50 EST ------- Hmm, well, please do include the URL for the tarball that is still available (if it's the same as what's in this package, of course) and add a comment to the spec explaining that the other tarball is no longer available from upstream. About the duplicate GameID thing, I don't think the spew in itself is a problem, but the fact that the game crashes (and will then crash continuously until you delete ~/.pysol) if you select a good portion of the games seems to be a significant problem to me. I can't tell if the two problems are related, though. For example, the game Cruel is broken but it doesn't show up in the complaints about duplicate IDs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 27 23:57:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226800] Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709272357.l8RNvuhE031300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-bbdb - email database for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226800 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2007-09-27 19:57 EST ------- Updated to fix the rpmlint warnings: SPEC: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb.spec SRPM: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/emacs-bbdb-2.35-8.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 00:55:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280055.l8S0tSNB005714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com 2007-09-27 20:55 EST ------- sorry, I think /usr/share/fonts/wenquanyi-unibit might be better than .../wqy-unibit Spec URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://wenq.org/release/unibit/wqy-unibit-fonts-1.1.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 01:37:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280137.l8S1bRP1017563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-27 21:37 EST ------- I've been looking around, no other distributions have patches ready so it seems like this is an upstream problem, and seeing as upstream doesn't provide tarballs and hasn't been updates since 2003... We're in trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 02:12:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280212.l8S2C50c015088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 22:12 EST ------- Well, I know I've played pysol since 2003. The source hasn't changed, so perhaps something has changed with Python which has caused this breakage. I don't know nearly enough about Python to have any clue what might have changed, but at least it's a place to start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 02:16:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280216.l8S2G2ek015676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 22:16 EST ------- URL field is for the project webpage not the source. So we want one url for URL and one for SOURCE. How about: URL: http://cle.linux.org.tw/ Though they don't mention taipeifonts on the website directly anymore I think it is respectful to acknowledge the work of CLE here. Source0: http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/taipeifonts-1.2.tar.gz using %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz is better since it shows that the name and version follows upstream. Add Source2: http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/re-build.readme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 02:18:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280218.l8S2IKo5015972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-27 22:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=209341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=209341&action=view) taipeifonts.spec-2.patch Here is a patch with a better base url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 02:32:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280232.l8S2Wp2i024903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-27 22:32 EST ------- More info: The code in pysol.py starting at line 60 importa all of the games and plugins. Then the code in main.py (line 94) loads the plugins again. Passing --noplugins disables the second load and things seem to work well. Note that your wrapper doesn't pass on the arguments; it might be best if you added "$*" to the end of the command line. So now it remains to figure out which chunk of code would be best to disable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:19:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280319.l8S3JhoD025763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Which one are you talking about? > > Since the original man pages are encoded in EUC-JP and we want to see the > Japanese man pages in UTF-8, it's being converted at the build time. the content > itself is the same though, actually it's the different files IMHO. Oh yes. Sorry. I Forgot that we used iconv and that created new files with new timestamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:20:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280320.l8S3KDrn026136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:20 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 40af705db14a4ef92bacc0d3e78a4aff man-pages-ja-20070915.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:28:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280328.l8S3SJe9000927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:28 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 6cb01766fb627a5046d482645c69f39a lybniz-1.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + Package lybniz-1.3-3.fc8 -> Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/python pygtk2 >= 2.6 python >= 2.4 + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:35:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226435] Merge Review: startup-notification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280335.l8S3ZrRP027961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226435 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:35 EST ------- ping? Can you update SPEC for further review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:38:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280338.l8S3cQbg002120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:38 EST ------- ping? Can you update SPEC for further review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:35:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226360] Merge Review: readahead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280335.l8S3ZUpI002042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: readahead https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:35 EST ------- ping? Can you update SPEC for further review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 03:38:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226074] Merge Review: libXft In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280338.l8S3cC0O028119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226074 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-27 23:38 EST ------- ping? Can you update SPEC for further review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:05:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280405.l8S45Ec5005601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 00:05 EST ------- Please check the ownership of %{_datadir}/%{name}/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:09:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280409.l8S49A3p031932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-28 00:09 EST ------- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070928_taipeifonts/taipeifonts-1.2-3.fc8.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070928_taipeifonts/taipeifonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:12:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280412.l8S4CvtT006260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 cchance at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-28 00:12 EST ------- Source of README should be treated same as other sources: i.e. from http://ftp2.tnc.edu.tw/pub3/CLE/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-9.1/source/taipeifonts-1.2/re-build.readme to Source2: ftp://cle.linux.org.tw/pub/CLE/devel/wjwu/slackware/slackware-10.0/source/%{name}-%{version}/re-build.readme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280423.l8S4NT5E007512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 00:23 EST ------- How come my eyes missed that? Looks I should take a rest for day now. Stewart, Change %files section line from %{_datadir}/%{name}/* to %{_datadir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:32:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280432.l8S4Wxvt008709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-28 00:32 EST ------- This is done in http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz-1.3-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:34:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280434.l8S4Yah6002389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:33:52 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280433.l8S4Xqpb002335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-28 00:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lybniz Short Description: A function graph plotter Owners: firewing Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: firewing Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 04:58:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280458.l8S4w5o0005803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 00:58 EST ------- taipeifonts.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2-4 1.2-3.fc7 Please bump the release. Also please preserve the timestamp of the readme file in %prep with "cp -p". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 05:07:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226126] Merge Review: man-pages-ja In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280507.l8S57k6d007201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-ja https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226126 tagoh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2007-09-28 01:07 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing. the updated package has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 05:12:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280512.l8S5C9uh014041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 01:12 EST ------- I assume you did that change in http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/lybniz/lybniz-1.3-4.fc8.src.rpm * issue got solved. * mock build is successful But this new SPEC gave now rpmlint warning lybniz.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.82-4 1.3-4.fc7 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. Before cvs-import, remember to correct changelog version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:29:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280629.l8S6T77u017433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: libpano13 - |Review Request: libpano13 - |Library for manipulating |Library for manipulating |panoramic images |panoramic images ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 02:29 EST ------- I will pick this for review. 1)do you need following files in -doc as rpmlint reported them as errors? blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classListInitializer__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classListInitializationSwitch__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classF__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/minmax_8h__incl.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classReduceMaxIndexVector__coll__graph.png blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classVectorIterConst__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classVectorIter__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classIRNGWrapper_3_01IRNG_00_01sharedState_01_4__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classIRNGWrapper_3_01IRNG_00_01independentState_01_4__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/wrap-climits_8h__incl.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classReduceMaxIndexVector__coll__graph.map 2) Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections. 3)Change preun section as suggested in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-47896da5fb2662d75deefeb9ba75145a398515db 4) Add COPYING, README and LICENSE to all %doc lines in each %files sections 5) Good to have examples directory installed as part of -devel package Add examples to %doc of -devel 6) Remove following from SPEC Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig 7) Source URL should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 8) Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). 9)Artistic 1.0 license is not valid now in Fedora. Upstream should move to Artistic 2.0 license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:40:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308091] Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280640.l8S6e4Yj025078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar (bzr) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308091 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:40:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308101] Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280640.l8S6eUPn019030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Revision Bump of Bazaar Tools (bzrtools) to 0.90 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308101 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:40:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280640.l8S6eNOA018995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 02:40 EST ------- Basically looks fine to me. A few comments: - better to use: %defattr(-,root,root,-) - I'd put taipeifonts after cjkunifonts in the requires. - please describe in the changelog that the change is that taipei fonts was moved to a separate package taipeifonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:44:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280644.l8S6iWLo025340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 02:44 EST ------- looks upstream got new release. If you still want to contribute this package to Fedora then I will review this provided you give new SPEC and SRPM links of new upstream release. Also, make sure to use valid License names. You can use rpmlint command to check for any warnings or error messages on SRPM and RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:45:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246432] Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280645.l8S6jMGW025824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blitz : C++ class library for matrix scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246432 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 02:45 EST ------- I will pick this for review. 1)do you need following files in -doc as rpmlint reported them as errors? blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classListInitializer__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classListInitializationSwitch__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classF__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/minmax_8h__incl.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classReduceMaxIndexVector__coll__graph.png blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classVectorIterConst__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classVectorIter__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classIRNGWrapper_3_01IRNG_00_01sharedState_01_4__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classIRNGWrapper_3_01IRNG_00_01independentState_01_4__coll__graph.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/wrap-climits_8h__incl.map blitz-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/blitz-doc-0.9/html/classReduceMaxIndexVector__coll__graph.map 2) Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections. 3)Change preun section as suggested in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-47896da5fb2662d75deefeb9ba75145a398515db 4) Add COPYING, README and LICENSE to all %doc lines in each %files sections 5) Good to have examples directory installed as part of -devel package Add examples to %doc of -devel 6) Remove following from SPEC Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig 7) Source URL should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 8) Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). 9)Artistic 1.0 license is not valid now in Fedora. Upstream should move to Artistic 2.0 license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:47:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280647.l8S6lMqI019900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 02:47 EST ------- Potentially we could also drop taipeifonts from fonts-chinese if it is not that important for most Chinese users? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:51:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280651.l8S6p2vR026681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-28 02:51 EST ------- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070928_taipeifonts/taipeifonts-1.2-4.fc8.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070928_taipeifonts/taipeifonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 06:58:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280658.l8S6wncM027506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-28 02:58 EST ------- http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070928_fonts-chinese/fonts-chinese-3.03-12.fc8.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/20070928_fonts-chinese/fonts-chinese.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:00:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280700.l8S706df027914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 03:00 EST ------- oops wrongly pasted above comment which should be in other package review which I did before. Now its your turn. here is your preliminary review. 1) Good to use following syntax in SPEC Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} for -devel and -tools sub packages. 2) Use make %{?_smp_mflags} 3)Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:00:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280700.l8S705jk021535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2007-09-28 03:00 EST ------- Personally I would be more preferred to have a replacement of taipeifonts before dropping that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:05:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280705.l8S75kTW022302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 03:05 EST ------- If there is no upstream license file then we can't include it. Running strings on the .ttf file shows: Open Type rules and Nepali glyphsets developed at Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya and released under GPL. Contacts: Madan Puraskar Pustakalaya Yalamaya Kendra, Patan, NEPAL GPO Box. 42 www.mpp.org.np info at mpp.org.np Font Developers: Gaurav Shrestha Anjan Ale Have we confirmed with the authors that it is intended to be GPLv2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:11:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290581] Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280711.l8S7BoaU029483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: madan-fonts - Font for Nepali https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290581 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 03:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=209621) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=209621&action=view) madan-fonts.spec-1.patch some more recommended cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253812] Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280719.l8S7J6t1023929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package Review: taipeifonts (split from fonts-chinese). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253812 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 03:19 EST ------- For the record here is the md5sum of the source tarball: 9e4acdd5a218dea6aaa28bc80d472aad taipeifonts-1.2.tar.gz which coincides with the one from CLE. Thanks for the review. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:26:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280726.l8S7QgpU031651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 03:26 EST ------- Looks fine to me. Please go ahead and commit this to cvs and I will approve it. :) We can close this when it has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:48:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280748.l8S7mgKC028290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-28 03:48 EST ------- Thx for the review. It was a pleasure for me. Well, yes if the compiler flags break something I have to revert it, but I don't think they will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:51:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280751.l8S7puUe002641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 03:51 EST ------- I saw cvs commits for this package in fedora-extras-commits mailing list. This mean package got built successfully for all requested branches. Therefore, closing this review ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:54:32 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280754.l8S7sWfL029290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 03:54 EST ------- For 2.1.1-7: * About %postun: - Still there is a typo -------------------------------------------------------- rm -f %{_sysconfdir}/pot.tmp -------------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue (In reply to comment #23) > - Added directories to belong to package - Please check all. Still %_prefix/lib/rpmbuild/plugins is not owned. * For %_prefix/lib/rpmbuild: (In reply to comment #23) > OK, this is one problem that I am not sure how to solve. What do you guys > suggest? - You should use %_prefix/lib/rpmbuild, not %_libdir/rpmbuild. This is not a upstream issue, just rpm macro usage issue. * rpmlint for srpm: --------------------------------------------------------- rpmrebuild.src:112: W: macro-in-%changelog doc --------------------------------------------------------- - Please use %%doc in %changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 07:56:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280756.l8S7uw8k003558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 oliver at linux-kernel.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel.at 2007-09-28 03:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aboot Short Description: A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console Owners: oliver Branches: devel InitialCC: oliver Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 08:10:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280810.l8S8AFpq032702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 08:54:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285561] Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280854.l8S8skIq006689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wqy-unibit-fonts - a dual-width bitmap font for maximum unicode coverage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285561 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-28 04:54 EST ------- Few more comments: - you don't need %fontconfdir - please use %{version} in Source field - not sure if %wqyroot is really necessary if it is only used in one place - don't need to create (touch) fonts.dir in %install One more time about the name: wqy-unibit-fonts is fine but if you prefer it could also be wqy-unibit-bdf-fonts which seems closer to the upstream name. Either is fine and it is up to you, as long as we keep consistent naming within fedora and relative to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 09:34:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280934.l8S9YOQR018395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 05:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * Documents > - The tarball contains some files under doc/html/ > and examples/. Would you consider to include some > files from these directories (and create -doc > subpackage), for example? Oh, I noticed that you have also submitted "qwt-doc". Then this can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 09:32:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280932.l8S9WuIN012276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2007-09-28 05:32 EST ------- Updated package at, Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/flagpoll/flagpoll.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/flagpoll/flagpoll-0.9.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 09:32:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709280932.l8S9WSdo012239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 05:32 EST ------- For 5.0.2-2: * Source URL - For sourceforge tarball, please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Group - IMO usually the main package has "System Environment/Libraries" and "Development/Libraries" is for -devel package. * License - License can be fine with 'LGPLv2 with exceptions' * Setup - %setup must be quiet (i.e. use '%setup -q') * parallel make - Support parallel make ('make %{?_smp_mflags}') if possible. Otherwise write as a comment that qwt does not support it. * %defattr - Now we recommend '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' * File entry - Some files are listed twice --------------------------------------------------- %{_includedir}/%{name}/* %{_includedir}/%{name} --------------------------------------------------- ! Note Say "foo" is a directory. Then if we write in %files entry --------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) foo --------------------------------------------------- this means the directory "foo/" itself and all files/directories/etc under the directory foo/. * Documents - The tarball contains some files under doc/html/ and examples/. Would you consider to include some files from these directories (and create -doc subpackage), for example? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 10:20:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 06:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249126] Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281020.l8SAKtfU019081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flagpoll - Developers' tool for storing compilation information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249126 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 06:20 EST ------- thanks. will do complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 11:35:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310631] New: Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310631 Summary: Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sfernand at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/pkgs/wmnd.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/pkgs/wmnd-0.4.12-0.fc7.src.rpm Description: WMND (WindowMaker Network Devices) is a network monitoring dock app improved and based on WMiFS 1.3b. URL of original package: http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/wmnd/ It displays various network interface stats in real time using a variety of different graphing options. Currently, there is no similar network monitoring dockapp for windowmaker. This is my first submission to Fedora (so, please be gentle, don't hurt me :)). I intend to submit a few more dockapps which I use myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 11:41:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] New: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Package Name: GREYCstoration Spec URL: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration.spec SRPM URL: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-1.src.rpm Description: GREYCstoration is an image regularization algorithm which is able to process a color image by locally removing small variations of pixel intensities while preserving significant global image features, such as edges and corners. The most direct application of image regularization is image denoising. By extension, it can also be used to inpaint or resize images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 12:09:07 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281209.l8SC97ax001732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-28 08:09 EST ------- Whoops, missed a build requires there, let's try that again. SRPM URL: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 12:16:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248991] Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281216.l8SCG1WY002914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-iniparse - A better INI parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248991 tla at rasmil.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 12:19:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281219.l8SCJN9I003180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2007-09-28 08:19 EST ------- Fixed (sorry for the delay) SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-13-2/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.13-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 12:26:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281226.l8SCQYpv004544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2007-09-28 08:26 EST ------- Ownership on ORBit-2 has already been fixed but not imported yet. I'm still waitting that the bug #226223 is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 12:40:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254211] Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281240.l8SCeFiP007119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guile-gnome-platform - Guile wrapper collection for the GNOME library stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254211 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 08:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > Ownership on ORBit-2 has already been fixed but not imported yet. > I'm still waitting that the bug #226223 is fixed. So, for now please make %_libdir/orbit-2.0 owned by guile-gnome-platform explicitly (i.e. add %dir %_libdir/orbit-2.0 until bug 226223 is solved) and import this package. (My message: (In reply to comment #22) > Xavier, ORBit2 directory ownership issue is not fixed. was for ORBit2 package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:15:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281315.l8SDFXFF012944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-28 09:15 EST ------- awesome thanks. I just realized that I have been using the rpmlint for rhel instead of fedora. Either later today or this weekend I will address these issues, and run the fedora rpmlint against my stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:16:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 283931] Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281316.l8SDGQ0M019467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boswars - Bos Wars is a futuristic real-time strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-28 09:16 EST ------- Note, I've submitted a patch for SDL which fixes the crash on intel video, see bug 310841. I would be much obliged if you could build a local version of SDL with the patch, confirm that it fixes this and add a favorable comment to bug 310841. The SDL maintainer is usually not all that willing to take patches :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:29:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239087] Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281329.l8SDTQqG021280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nmap-Parser - Parse nmap scan data with perl Alias: perl-Nmap-Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239087 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:29:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239088] Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281329.l8SDTPir021260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pbnj - Tools to monitor changes on a network over time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239088 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 09:29 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:36:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239279] Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281336.l8SDa9am016578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol Alias: libssh2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239279 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 09:36 EST ------- IMO this review must be closed if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. There are some other packages submitted by Sindre with no response for a long time. I will also want to close bugs which are blocked by this bug if no response is gained within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:38:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241078] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281338.l8SDchBP022967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Alias: perl-Net-SSH2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241078 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 09:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As said in libssh2, I will close this bug if no response > from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. Sorry, I made a confusion... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:38:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241078] Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281338.l8SDcI1e022931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SSH2 - Support for the SSH 2 protocol via libSSH2 Alias: perl-Net-SSH2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241078 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 09:38 EST ------- As said in bug 239279, I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:36:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239280] Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281336.l8SDaLT8016645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: medusa - A speedy, massively parallel, modular, login brute-forcer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239280 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(foolish at guezz.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 09:36 EST ------- This bug is blocked by bug 239279, and there is no response for both review requests for a long time. I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 13:40:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281340.l8SDev1j023545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rafalzaq at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2007-09-28 09:40 EST ------- Above link is broken so I use this one: http://www.theknight.co.uk/releases/tzclock-2.5.4-1.src.rpm * rpmlint is not silent: tzclock-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package tzclock.src: E: invalid-spec-name TzClock.spec * you should use %{?dist} macro in Release tag * package fails to build in mock; missing BR: libgnomeui-devel * you should include AUTHORS and COPYING files in %doc * IMO you should change all names to lowercase to improve usability * IANAL but this doesn't look like GPLv2 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------* * * * T Z C L O C K G T K . C * * ========================= * * * * All rights reserved. Reproduction, modification, use or * * disclosure to third parties without express authority is * * forbidden. Copyright Teligent AB, Sweden, 2006. * * * *----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 14:37:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226435] Merge Review: startup-notification In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281437.l8SEbl5B027060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: startup-notification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226435 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-28 10:37 EST ------- should be good good on those two fronts now. Feel free to commit any reasonable spec cleanups you want to that package. It's not under any sort of ACL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 14:55:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281455.l8SEtV4N030676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-28 10:55 EST ------- Ok, I have fixed the issues described on Comment #24, but if I use use %_prefix/lib/rpmbuild instead of %_libdir/rpmbuild, rpmlints gives the following errors: rpmrebuild.spec:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/rpmrebuild/VERSION rpmrebuild.spec:35: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild_parser.src rpmrebuild.spec:37: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild_parser.src rpmrebuild.spec:38: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/rpmrebuild/rpmrebuild_parser.src rpmrebuild.spec:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/rpmrebuild/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 14:55:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281455.l8SEtxHK004253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-28 10:55 EST ------- PS - I haven't posted the new spec yet due to the error above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:04:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281504.l8SF4RlZ005338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 11:04 EST ------- picking up this for review. rpmlint output on SRPM and RPMs is not clean On SRPM it showed ------------------------------------ system-config-printer.src:30: W: prereq-use system-config-printer-libs = %{version}-%{release} The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. system-config-printer.src:44: W: prereq-use python The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. On RPM it showed ------------------------------------ system-config-printer.i386: I: checking system-config-printer.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-printer A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. system-config-printer.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. system-config-printer.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/system-config-printer A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. system-config-printer.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-0.7.74.3/NEWS ===> You can drop this file. system-config-printer.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-printer/cupsd.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. system-config-printer.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided system-config-printer-gui If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. system-config-printer.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. ===> good to add following line in SPEC BuildArch: noarch system-config-printer.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm On -libs RPM it showed ----------------------------------- system-config-printer-libs.i386: I: checking system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/newprinternotification.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. system-config-printer-libs.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-printer/cupshelpers.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Common code for the graphical and non-graphical pieces. Summary ends with a dot. system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/system-config-printer-libs-0.7.74.3/pycups-1.9.27/examples/cupstree.py /usr/bin/python An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. Also, 1) update buildroot tag to either of value given below %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root 2) use %defattr(-,root,root,-) 3) preserve timestamps by using -p option eg. cp -p or install -p. Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:07:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281507.l8SF7c9d006093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-28 11:07 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:05:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281505.l8SF5TxW005909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 11:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Ok, I have fixed the issues described on Comment #24, but if I use use > %_prefix/lib/rpmbuild instead of %_libdir/rpmbuild, rpmlints gives the following > errors: > > rpmrebuild.spec:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/rpmrebuild/VERSION Yes, these rpmlint errors are expected. However, as "rpm" actually uses /usr/lib, not %_libdir, this rpmlint error cannot be avoided for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:15:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281515.l8SFFxpA007716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-28 11:15 EST ------- http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-8.src.rpm Here we go then! Thanks again for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:24:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281524.l8SFO41V003125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-lvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 11:24 EST ------- need some SPEC cleanups 1) avoid makeinstall usage http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 2) update buildroot tag as said below http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 3) use make %{?_smp_mflags} rpmlint said system-config-lvm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 100, tab: line 35) system-config-lvm.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A utility for graphically configuring Logical Volumes. system-config-lvm.src: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/fdisk_wrapper.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/VolumeGroup.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/pixmaps/VG.xpm 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/pixmaps/PV.xpm 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/pixmaps/UV.xpm 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Segment.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Partition.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/ExtentBlock.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/execute.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/renderer.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/utilities.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Cluster.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/BlockDevice.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/lvmui_constants.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/lvm_model.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/parted_wrapper.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Volume.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Filesystem.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/cylinder_items.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/PhysicalVolume.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/pixmaps/grad3.xpm 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/pixmaps/LV.xpm 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/CommandHandler.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/CommandError.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Volume_Tab_View.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Volume_Tab_View.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Properties_Renderer.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Fstab.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/InputController.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/WaitMsg.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/LogicalVolume.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/BlockDeviceModel.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/system-config-lvm/Multipath.py 0640 system-config-lvm.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A utility for graphically configuring Logical Volumes. system-config-lvm.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-lvm.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-lvm system-config-lvm.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-lvm Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:37:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281537.l8SFbuhT006250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 11:37 EST ------- Need some SPEC cleanups as rpmlint gave me system-config-network.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes isdn-config system-config-network.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes internet-config system-config-network.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes rp3 system-config-network.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-network system-config-network.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes netcfg system-config-network.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-network-tui system-config-network.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes netconfig ==> The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. system-config-network.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-provides redhat-config-network-tui ==>The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. system-config-network.src: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-network.noarch: W: no-documentation system-config-network.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode system-config-network.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglade2 ==> You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. system-config-network.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided isdn-config system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided internet-config system-config-network.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rp3 system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: no-documentation system-config-network-tui.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-network/netconfpkg/exception.py 0644 system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL ==> Update Licenst tag system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netcfg system-config-network-tui.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided netconfig ==> If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. Also, Good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:55:23 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281555.l8SFtNnB009264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 11:55 EST ------- Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 15:53:20 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226472] Merge Review: system-config-users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281553.l8SFrKLK008801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226472 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 11:53 EST ------- picking up this for review. rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave -------------------------------- system-config-users.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-users The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. system-config-users.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-users/system-config-users.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. system-config-users.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.68 1.2.68-1.fc8 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. system-config-users.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-users If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. system-config-users.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-users A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here system-config-users.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-users A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here Also, 1) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) 2) any reason for not using macros for following line om %files section /usr/bin/system-config-users %dir /usr/share/system-config-users /usr/share/system-config-users/* 3) packaging guidelines suggest use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 16:06:33 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281606.l8SG6Xtt010928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-28 12:06 EST ------- Ah.. after I checked %postun scriptlet again, I came to think that the following is simpler: ---------------------------------------------------------- %postun # Remove all lines which contain 'RPMREBUILD START' # to 'RPMREBUILD END' in %{_sysconfdir}/popt [ $1 -eq 0 ] || exit 0 if [ -f %{_sysconfdir}/popt ]; then sed -i -e '/RPMREBUILD START/,/RPMREBUILD END/d' %{_sysconfdir}/popt fi --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 16:25:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281625.l8SGPpOo019013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From anderson.silva at redhat.com 2007-09-28 12:25 EST ------- http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild.spec http://www.the-silvas.com/rpmrebuild-2.1.1-9.src.rpm here we go. AS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 16:26:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226471] Merge Review: system-config-soundcard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281626.l8SGQk5U013986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-soundcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226471 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 12:26 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM and RPM is not clean ------------------------- system-config-soundcard.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-soundcard system-config-soundcard.src:31: W: prereq-use hicolor-icon-theme system-config-soundcard.src:160: W: macro-in-%changelog preun system-config-soundcard.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install system-config-soundcard.src: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-soundcard.noarch: W: no-documentation system-config-soundcard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/soundcardBackendKudzu.py system-config-soundcard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/soundcardBackend.py system-config-soundcard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/soundcardBackendHal.py system-config-soundcard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/soundcardBackendSoundCard.py system-config-soundcard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/soundcard.py system-config-soundcard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/soundcardBackendProc.py system-config-soundcard.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-soundcard.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-soundcard system-config-soundcard.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-soundcard system-config-soundcard.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-soundcard --------------------------------------------------------- also, 1) update buildroot tag as given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 2) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 3) missing buildroot cleanup in %install. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-6c809b2e945ca78ae25d040f250be60f73181ef0 4) any reason for not using macros for following line om %files section /usr/bin/system-config-soundcard %dir /usr/share/system-config-soundcard /usr/share/system-config-soundcard/* 5) Any reason for commenting %doc COPYING? 6) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 16:53:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226467] Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281653.l8SGrQW6017265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-rootpassword https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226467 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 12:53 EST ------- Preliminary Review:- rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me ------------------------------------- system-config-rootpassword.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-rootpassword ==> The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. system-config-rootpassword.src:21: W: prereq-use gtk2 >= 2.6 ==> The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. system-config-rootpassword.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ==> You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". system-config-rootpassword.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 36, tab: line 39) ==> The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. system-config-rootpassword.noarch: W: no-documentation system-config-rootpassword.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-rootpassword/rootpassword_tui.py system-config-rootpassword.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-rootpassword/passwordDialog.py ==>This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. system-config-rootpassword.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/firstboot/modules/rootpassword.py /usr/share/system-config-rootpassword/passwordDialog.py ==>Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. system-config-rootpassword.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-rootpassword ==> If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. system-config-rootpassword.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-rootpassword system-config-rootpassword.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-rootpassword ==> A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here ---------------------------------------------------- also, 1) update buildroot tag as given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 2) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 3) missing buildroot cleanup in %install. check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-6c809b2e945ca78ae25d040f250be60f73181ef0 4) any reason for not using macros for following line om %files section /usr/bin/system-config-rootpassword %dir /usr/share/system-config-rootpassword %dir /usr/share/system-config-rootpassword/pixmaps /usr/share/system-config-rootpassword/* %dir /usr/share/firstboot/ %dir /usr/share/firstboot/modules /usr/share/firstboot/modules/rootpassword.py* 5) Any reason for commenting %doc COPYING? 6) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 16:59:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226465] Merge Review: system-config-nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281659.l8SGxJSl022966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-nfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226465 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 12:59 EST ------- Preliminary Review:- rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me ------------------------------------- system-config-nfs.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-nfs system-config-nfs.src: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-nfs/propertiesWindow.py system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-nfs/system-config-nfs.glade system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsServer.py system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsExports.py system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-nfs/nfsServerSettings.py system-config-nfs.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-nfs/mainWindow.py system-config-nfs.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3.27 1.3.27-1.fc8 system-config-nfs.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-nfs.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-nfs system-config-nfs.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-nfs system-config-nfs.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-nfs -------------------------------------------------- also, good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 17:04:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226470] Merge Review: system-config-services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281704.l8SH4OJx023755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226470 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 13:04 EST ------- Preliminary Review:- rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me ------------------------------------- system-config-services.src:26: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes serviceconf system-config-services.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-services system-config-services.src:168: W: macro-in-%changelog _bindir system-config-services.src: W: summary-not-capitalized system-config-services is an initscript and xinetd configuration utility system-config-services.src: E: description-line-too-long system-config-services is a utility which allows you to configure which services system-config-services.src: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-services.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/system-config-services-0.9.10/html/legalnotice.html system-config-services.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-services/servicemethods.py system-config-services.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-services/checklist.py system-config-services.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized system-config-services is an initscript and xinetd configuration utility system-config-services.noarch: E: description-line-too-long system-config-services is a utility which allows you to configure which services system-config-services.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.10 0.9.10-1.fc8 system-config-services.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided serviceconf system-config-services.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-services system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/serviceconf system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-services system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/serviceconf system-config-services.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-services ------------------------------------------------------- also, 1) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 2) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 17:04:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226468] Merge Review: system-config-samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281704.l8SH4TYV018669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226468 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-28 13:04 EST ------- Preliminary Review:- rpmlint on SRPM and RPM gave me ------------------------------------- system-config-samba.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes redhat-config-samba system-config-samba.src: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaParser.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaUserWin.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaBackend.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaDefaults.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/mainWindow.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/basicPreferencesWin.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaUserData.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/smb.conf.template system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/addUserWin.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/shareWindow.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/system-config-samba.glade system-config-samba.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-samba/sambaToken.py system-config-samba.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libuser-python system-config-samba.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.52 1.2.52-1.fc8 system-config-samba.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL system-config-samba.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided redhat-config-samba system-config-samba.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/system-config-samba system-config-samba.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/system-config-samba ------------------------------------------------------- also, 1) packaging guidelines suggests use of make as http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 2) good to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Update package. Better to provide new SPEC and SRPM links for this package before actually committing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 17:07:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226466] Merge Review: system-config-printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281707.l8SH7hq7019337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-printer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226466 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2007-09-28 13:07 EST ------- I don't think /etc/xdg/autostart/redhat-print-applet.desktop should be marked as a config file. Other files in that directory are not marked as config files. /usr/share/system-config-printer/cupshelpers.py: fixed upstream, will be in the next release (0.7.74.4). system-config-printer-libs.i386: W: doc-file-dependency Not an extra dependendency, and it's a useful example file to have executable. http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer/system-config-printer-0.7.74.3-1.0.0.1.fc8.src.rpm http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/system-config-printer/system-config-printer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 17:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226462] Merge Review: system-config-lvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281739.l8SHdHZP028992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-lvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226462 rmccabe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From rmccabe at redhat.com 2007-09-28 13:39 EST ------- SRPM and spec file at http://people.redhat.com/jparsons/downloads/s-c-lvm/ rpmlint -v produces no warnings now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 18:09:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281809.l8SI9GoP001412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-28 14:09 EST ------- So fixed: Here the next try: SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-5.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 19:12:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302351] Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709281912.l8SJCCY3010889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: higlayout - Easy to use and powerful layout manager for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302351 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 20:33:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303141] Package for python gdl bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282033.l8SKXEwN023799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package for python gdl bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303141 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 20:32:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 303141] Package for python gdl bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282032.l8SKWAf5018921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package for python gdl bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=303141 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2007-09-28 16:32 EST ------- Not a problem. Added a gnome-python2-gdl subpackage to gnome-python2-extras. gnome-python2-extras-2.19.1-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:20:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244171] Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282120.l8SLKSVe025943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SteGUI - SteGUI is a graphical front-end to Steghide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244171 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-28 17:20 EST ------- SteGUI-0.0.1-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:21:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282121.l8SLLrbs030782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-28 17:21 EST ------- php-channel-phing-1.0.0-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:21:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282121.l8SLLxK8030845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.11-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:21:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275231] Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282121.l8SLLsOa030812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phing - Adds phing channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275231 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:21:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275871] Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282121.l8SLLw36026489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldrin - Modular music sequencer/tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275871 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-28 17:21 EST ------- aldrin-0.11-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:21:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275211] Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282121.l8SLLm64026447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpdb - Adds phpdb channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275211 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2007-09-28 17:21 EST ------- php-channel-phpdb-1.0.0-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:25:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305631] Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282125.l8SLPEiA027103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-qt-engine - Bluecurve qt engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305631 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-28 17:25 EST ------- we're going to merge this one into bluecurve-kde-theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:30:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282130.l8SLUEsb032402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-28 17:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:30:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305581] Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282130.l8SLUZxH032507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-kde-theme - Bluecurve KDE theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305581 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-28 17:30 EST ------- okay i've integrated the two now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:35:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195311] Review Request: coolkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282135.l8SLZ0xx032719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coolkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195311 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-28 17:35 EST ------- This appears to already be done. (via the pkgdb web interface?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:31:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 294641] Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282131.l8SLVt0L028321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aboot - A bootloader which can be started from the SRM console. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-28 17:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:36:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282136.l8SLawhv000880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-28 17:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 21:49:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282149.l8SLndcG030499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2007-09-28 17:49 EST ------- SRPM: http://ausil.us/packages/silo-1.4.13-6.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://ausil.us/packages/silo.spec #2 i dont think is a problem. it will get called very early in the boot process #3 it builds on sparc :) which is all supported archs there is no need to build silo as a sparc64 binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 23:14:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308251] Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282314.l8SNEeul013141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lybniz - A function graph plotter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308251 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-28 19:14 EST ------- Built - Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 28 23:28:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195311] Review Request: coolkey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709282328.l8SNSlrs014916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: coolkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195311 ------- Additional Comments From rrelyea at redhat.com 2007-09-28 19:28 EST ------- Yes, sorry I should have removed the request. Thanks, bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 07:02:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709290702.l8T72385032201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-29 03:02 EST ------- Ah, quite right -- the icon would need to be replaced -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 07:07:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301741] Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709290707.l8T77uxw000514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: whowatch - Display information about users currently logged on users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301741 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-29 03:07 EST ------- Subhodip, please remember to close the bug ticket as NEXTRELEASE. It looks like you've done a build of this package in Koji.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 07:23:29 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709290723.l8T7NTfn002180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-29 03:23 EST ------- For -3: * Parallel make failed (at least for -j4, i386) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=178403 Without parallel make the rebuild is successful. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=178415 Please drop parallel support (and write a comment). = Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (qwt) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 08:37:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 04:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 308111] Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709290837.l8T8bQ2T015930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quake3 - Quake 3 Arena tournament 3D shooter game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=308111 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-29 04:37 EST ------- All additional reported issues fixed, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 10:14:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 06:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291014.l8TAEtRK028423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-29 06:14 EST ------- Very interesting, because at me, parallel build works. But to prevent for build errors, I will disable it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qwt Short Description: Qt Widgets for Technical Applications Owners: frankb Branches: FC-6 F7 EL-4 Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 11:01:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291101.l8TB1tuT030475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 12:50:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 306431] Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291250.l8TCoLgB016244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-python - a python wrapper for SCIM input platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=306431 phuang at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From phuang at redhat.com 2007-09-29 08:50 EST ------- make build successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 13:14:00 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291314.l8TDE0ua019095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-29 09:13 EST ------- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 13:18:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291318.l8TDIPNf019744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 ------- Additional Comments From 440volt.tux at gmail.com 2007-09-29 09:18 EST ------- do i have to do it again ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 13:34:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 276961] Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291334.l8TDY5lr021774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: straw - Desktop news aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=276961 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-29 09:34 EST ------- For F-7, please request to move from testing to stable when you think it is okay. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 14:27:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252456] Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291427.l8TERHWK024637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silo - The SILO boot loader for SPARCs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252456 jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2007-09-29 10:27 EST ------- #1: clearly addressed. #2: shouldn't be an issue. #3: do we need to file ExclusiveArch bugs? Whatever, not exactly a blocker. I'm going to deem silo APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 14:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291457.l8TEvjtC032747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |243688 nThis| | BugsThisDependsOn|243688 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 14:59:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] New: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-ttxtsubs.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-ttxtsubs-0.0.5-1.cmn7.src.rpm This VDR plugin implements displaying, recording and replaying teletext based subtitles using the on screen display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 14:57:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291457.l8TEvj0x032722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |240180 OtherBugsDependingO|240180 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-29 10:57 EST ------- For 5.0.2-1: * License/Source URL - Please change like qwt review - For Source0: ------------------------------------------- Source0 http://ovh.dl........ ------------------------------------------- This must be "Source0:" * Install at %build section ------------------------------------------- %build cd src qmake-qt4 sed -i "s\install_doc: first FORCE\install_doc: FORCE\1" Makefile make install_doc ------------------------------------------- - The last line does not seem to be needed. * Timestamp - As this package almost simply installs document files from tarball, keeping timestamp on those files is preferable. * For make install_doc, passing "COPY="cp -a", i.e. ------------------------------------------- make -f src/Makefile install_doc COPY="cp -a" ------------------------------------------- keeps timestamp on most files * And for "cp" or "install" command, please add "-p" option ------------------------------------------- cp -p %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/qwt-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership - %_defaultdocdir/qwt-%{version} is not owned by this package * If you want to use this directory, this package needs "Requires: qwt = %{version}". * Or move all document files under %_defaultdocdir/qwt-doc-%{version} and have the directory owned by this package. * Macro in %changelog - %_dist tag is expanded differently when repository changes (for example, when we upgrade from fc8->fc9), then %changelog changes. %_dist macro should not be used in %changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 15:18:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291518.l8TFILpa031118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-29 11:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=211381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=211381&action=view) Suggested specfile changes This patch gets rid of the wstx dependency as well as the manifest Class-Path entry. Additionally, if the wstx dep can go indeed, it should be removed from the startup script too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 15:16:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291516.l8TFGpqp031082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-29 11:16 EST ------- Initial notes, not yet a full review: Doesn't Java 1.7 include the StAX APIs and a reference implementation? That would probably make all dependencies on wstx superfluous. In fact, the package builds fine with the dependencies removed and no wstx available. I don't have a setup where this could be tested at runtime, but at least build without wstx succeeds. Hardwired Class-Path entries in jar manifests are generally frowned upon, and in this case they point to stuff in the jars/ subdir which won't exist as freecol.jar is installed to /usr/share/java and the startup script takes care of the classpath. So they should be removed. The Encoding key in the desktop entry is deprecated, and could be removed. rpmlint: freecol-manual.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/img2.png freecol-manual.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/img1.png freecol-manual.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/img3.png Intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 15:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291530.l8TFUAh5000412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-29 11:30 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------- This package (rpmrebuild) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 16:10:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291610.l8TGAANK009920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 12:10 EST ------- A couple of comments: kaya.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 The licensing page specifies "LGPLv2" even for 2.1. The headers are OK, although it would probably be cleaner if they were grouped together in a subdirectory instead of strewn through /usr/lib/kaya. Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict with something. /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora. /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't conflict with anything. Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that are specific to this package. Is there any reasonable chance of getting them renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 16:29:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291629.l8TGTGWR012146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2007-09-29 12:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fbreader Short Description: E-book reader Owners: salimma Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 16:29:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291629.l8TGTkt8012191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-29 12:29 EST ------- First: ! Please change the release number of your spec/srpm each time you modify your spec/srpm. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FrequentlyMadeMistakes Then for 0.06-1: * Redundant Requires - "Requires: pcre" is not needed. rpmbuild checks dependency for libraries automatically and dependency for libpcre.so.0 automatically pulls pcre package ! Please consider if version specific dependency for libxml2(-devel) is really useful. Even RH9 (more than 4 years ago) has libxml2-2.5.4-1. "BuildRequires: libxml2-devel" is sufficient and "Requires: libxml2" is not needed, IMO * Source URL - Source0 returns 404 (not found). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 16:30:10 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291630.l8TGUAxA008209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 12:30 EST ------- A few comments: License: should should be "CeCILL", not "CeCiLL", although I can't imagine this makes any significant difference. The debuginfo package is completely empty. This is bad. It looks like the makefile is stripping the binaries by calling strip directly, so you will need to do some patching. rpmlint complains about both of these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 16:56:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291656.l8TGudq6011922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-29 12:56 EST ------- So here the next try: SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-doc-5.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-doc.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 17:38:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291738.l8THcBId017431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-29 13:38 EST ------- Please take this one: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qwt Short Description: Qt Widgets for Technical Applications Owners: frankb Branches: FC-6 F7 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 18:28:14 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291828.l8TISEoh027834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 ------- Additional Comments From osspkg at gmail.com 2007-09-29 14:28 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. Please see modified Spec http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/xml/xgrep/xgrep.spec and SRPM http://www.wohlberg.net/public/software/xml/xgrep/xgrep-0.06-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 18:45:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291845.l8TIjOpK030342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-29 14:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 18:42:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291842.l8TIgdoI025806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-29 14:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 19:37:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291937.l8TJbgJx004800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2007-09-29 15:37 EST ------- I've created my account on Fedora, username: afsilva. I need a Sponsor. Thanks Mamoru, whenver you think I am ready, Iwill start working on the import for F7 (during the week). AS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 19:50:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240180] Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291950.l8TJojtl006936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-29 15:50 EST ------- build done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 19:50:47 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291950.l8TJolYg006953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 Bug 243688 depends on bug 240180, which changed state. Bug 240180 Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 19:50:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709291950.l8TJonkg006968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 240180, which changed state. Bug 240180 Summary: Review Request: qwt - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240180 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:20:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291741] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292020.l8TKKO7H006871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 16:20 EST ------- This fails to build for me: checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78686 (%build) Just a missing build dependency on perl(XML::Parser); I added it and the build fails later: checking for python extension module directory... ${exec_prefix}/lib64/python2.5/site-packages Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 2, in File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/distutils/sysconfig.py", line 497, in get_config_vars func() File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/distutils/sysconfig.py", line 356, in _init_posix raise DistutilsPlatformError(my_msg) distutils.errors.DistutilsPlatformError: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib64/python2.5/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) not found I added a build dependency on python-devel and the build fails later: file=`echo hu | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \ && rm -f $file && -o $file hu.po /bin/sh: line 1: -o: command not found make[2]: *** [hu.gmo] Error 127 I added yet another build dependency, on gettext this time, and the build succeeds. If you already have build system access (which it seems you do since this bug isn't blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR) then you can do a scratch build in koji with koji build --scratch dist-fc8 gnome-hearts-0.2-1.fc7.src.rpm or (if you have the system for it) you can install mock locally and test doing clean builds there; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/MockTricks. Please be kind to the overworked reviewers and try to make sure your package builds properly in a clean buildroot before submitting it. Once building, there are some rpmlint warnings: gnome-hearts.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gnome-hearts/players/pauline.py 0644 (and many like it) It seems to be a python habit to begin any file containing python code with the usual #! line even though the file is not intended to ever be run from the command line. Most of the time I ignore such complaints, but please check to make sure those files aren't ever to be run directly; if they are, then they should be executable. gnome-hearts.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglade2 gnome-hearts.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgnomeui You should not include Requires: lines for libraries which rpm will find on its own. gnome-hearts.x86_64: E: no-changelogname-tag Your %changelog is empty; you must include proper content there; see the Changelogs section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines gnome-hearts.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL You must specify the proper GPL version; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing gnome-hearts.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/gnome-hearts.desktop You're missing the required call to desktop-file-install in %install; it would then fail your build with an error: /tmp/gnome-hearts.desktop: error: file contains multiple assignments of key "Name" This is simply because the file has "Name=No name" and "Name=Hearts". Please see the "Desktop files" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for more information on the guidelines surrounding desktop files. Please do try running rpmlint on your packages (both the binary and source RPMs) before submission; it often times spews complaints which aren't relevant and it's OK to ask about those complaints in your review, but it gives you a chance to clean up the easy fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:38:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292038.l8TKcevP013072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 jkeating at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jkeating at redhat.com 2007-09-29 16:38 EST ------- ping; any status on this? We're getting late into the Fedora cycle... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:42:46 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292042.l8TKgkAG009609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |241082 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:42:45 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292042.l8TKgjgd009593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |241079 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 16:42 EST ------- Looks like this depends on R-DynDoc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:55:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292055.l8TKtQnM015550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-09-29 16:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * rpmlint is not silent: > tzclock-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package debuginfo package removed. > tzclock.src: E: invalid-spec-name TzClock.spec spec file reverted to lowercase. > * you should use %{?dist} macro in Release tag Done, always wondered how it should be done. > * package fails to build in mock; missing BR: libgnomeui-devel Added build requirement, all this for a link on the about box. > * you should include AUTHORS and COPYING files in %doc Done. > * IMO you should change all names to lowercase to improve usability spec file at least is lowercase. > * IANAL but this doesn't look like GPLv2 Oooops my auto comment program caught me out. Thanks for your feedback, it is very helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:52:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292052.l8TKq5LM010969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:01:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292101.l8TL1CCw012276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 20:57:15 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292057.l8TKvFt7011593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 16:57 EST ------- Looks good to me and follows the R packaging guidelines closely. rpmlint is silent except for the expected one-line-command-in-* complaints. * source files match upstream: 0e95de3c2ea047e7c46655bf2c4751895ede720b179195cff0831d12146a71ba DynDoc_1.14.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: R-DynDoc = 1.14.0-5.fc8 = /bin/sh R * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (R package registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:05:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292105.l8TL5exq012831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-29 17:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-DynDoc Short Description: Functions for dynamic documents Owners: PierreYvesChibon Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:24:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] New: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: PySolFC is a collection of more than 1000 solitaire card games. It is a fork of PySol solitaire. Its features include modern look and feel (uses Tile widget set), multiple cardsets and tableau backgrounds, sound, unlimited undo, player statistics, a hint system, demo games, a solitaire wizard, support for user written plug-ins, an integrated HTML help browser, and lots of documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:26:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304301] Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292126.l8TLQHfx015654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:26:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292126.l8TLQDgJ015627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:26:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304341] Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292126.l8TLQJg2015719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-music - Music for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304341 Bug 304341 depends on bug 304301, which changed state. Bug 304301 Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:26:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304331] Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292126.l8TLQIB4015699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-sound-server - The pysol sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304331 Bug 304331 depends on bug 304301, which changed state. Bug 304301 Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:26:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292126.l8TLQHDI015678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 Bug 304311 depends on bug 304301, which changed state. Bug 304301 Summary: Review Request: pysol - A Python Solitaire game collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304301 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:26:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 304311] Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292126.l8TLQLAt019645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysol-cardsets - Various cardsets for pysol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304311 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:39:24 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292139.l8TLdOBK021122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:39:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312711] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292139.l8TLdH5c021093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312711 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:38:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312711] Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Music for PySolFC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292138.l8TLcgpD021031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Music for PySolFC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312711 s.adam at diffingo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: PySolFC- |Review Request: PySolFC- |cardsets - | ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-29 17:38 EST ------- Oops, copy>pasted to the wrong spot... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:38:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312721] New: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312721 Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-music - Music for PySolFC Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-music.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-music-4.40-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the background music for pysol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:37:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312711] New: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312711 Summary: Review Request: PySolFC-cardsets - Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s.adam at diffingo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.diffingo.com/downloads/diffingo-repo/PySolFC-cardsets-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Music for PySolFC This package contains the background music for pysol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 21:51:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292151.l8TLpruV019072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 17:51 EST ------- BTW, simply disabling the debuginfo package isn't usually the right thing to do. You need to understand why it's ending up empty. Either the package has no binaries, the proper CFLAGS aren't getting passed to the compiler, or something is stripping the binaries. All of these indicate some problem with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 22:09:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 223490] Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292209.l8TM9D0R021146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alex - The lexer generator for Haskell Alias: alex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223490 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 22:15:42 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292215.l8TMFgNb026149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 18:15 EST ------- Went ahead and knocked DynDoc out and stuck it in a local repo so I can review this. The License: tag needs a tweak for the new scheme. Unfortunately, I can't figure out what it might be; there's no actual mention of the LGPL in the tarball apart from the DESCRIPTION file which just says "License: LGPL". The code itself has unpleasant "All rights reserved" copyright notices. I think you will need to ping upstream and see if they can clarify. I note ths doesn't build without R-DynDoc, but does it have any runtime requirements on it? Similarly for R-widgetTools and the tcl/tk stuff. Currently you can install this with only R being present on the system, but I don't know if it will actually work. * source files match upstream: 226255e21582779ec7a2df43eecf58d19fb87f1bc9fb94e4f554b834d409fed5 tkWidgets_1.14.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. ? license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is sufficiently silent. X final provides and requires are missing some dependencies: R-tkWidgets = 1.14.0-4.fc8 = /bin/sh R * %check is present but I'm not sure there are any tests to run. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (R module registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 22:34:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240169] Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292234.l8TMYxjs024276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240169 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 18:34 EST ------- Coming back to this, I find that the package still fails to build in rawhide, although for a completely different reason: llvm[1]: Building llvm-config script. echo 's, at LLVM_CXXFLAGS@, -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_DEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Woverloaded-virtual,' > temp.sed echo 's, at LLVM_LDFLAGS@,,' >> temp.sed echo 's, at LLVM_BUILDMODE@,Release,' >> temp.sed /bin/sed -f temp.sed < llvm-config.in > /builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/Release/bin/llvm-config /bin/sed: file temp.sed line 1: unknown option to `s' make[1]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/llvm-1.9/Release/bin/llvm-config] Error 1 Seems the '-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' bit which is now passed to the C++ compiler by default conflicts with the use of a comma as the separator on that sed line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 23:09:08 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292309.l8TN98Ep000372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 23:19:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292319.l8TNJ6XW030066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-29 19:19 EST ------- I will send him an email about this question. Would you like to be add in Cc ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 29 23:31:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709292331.l8TNVYim031915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 19:31 EST ------- You can CC me if you wish, or just note the results in this ticket. Either way works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 00:00:44 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300000.l8U00i8Q003052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2007-09-29 20:00 EST ------- >I note ths doesn't build without R-DynDoc, but does it have any runtime >requirements on it? Similarly for R-widgetTools and the tcl/tk stuff. >Currently you can install this with only R being present on the system, but I >don't know if it will actually work. R libraries call functions that are included in other libraries, I believe this is the reason why they are depending on each other. The tcl/tk interfaces is also used for example when you have two time the same function (different functions but with the same name) on different packages, and you ask for the help file of the function, it loads then an interface where you can choice which help you want to consult. To check whether the package work you can first run R and load the library using library() => list all libraries installed library(tkWidgets) => load this library You can also find there some example implement for this library http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.0/bioc/vignettes/tkWidgets/inst/doc/tkWidgets.pdf I have mailed the maintainer of this package, he is now out of office, but do not precise when he will be back Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 00:30:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241082] Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300030.l8U0U3X2010695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-tkWidgets-1.14.0 - Widgets to provide user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241082 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-29 20:30 EST ------- > R libraries call functions that are included in other libraries, I believe > this is the reason why they are depending on each other. Yes, I understand that, but my complaint is precisely that this package, when built, does not depend on any other R packages. You have them as BuildRequires: but not Requires:, and rpm will not figure out R dependencies automatically as it will for Perl packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 01:59:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300159.l8U1xDXi017599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-29 21:59 EST ------- It seems you have not requested for cvsextras, and even you does not seem to have signed CLA agreement. Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join again. You seems to have finished "Get a Fedora Account" item 2. You have to finish item 4 of "Get a Fedora Account" before I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 03:13:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300313.l8U3DL9Q031094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2007-09-29 23:13 EST ------- I get an error when I run it here: $ pysol python: ./Modules/_tkinter.c:941: AsObj: Assertion `size < size * sizeof(Tcl_UniChar)' failed. /usr/bin/pysol: line 2: 3659 Aborted /usr/share/PySolFC/pysol.py $* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 03:13:37 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292691] Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300313.l8U3DbRM027025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fbreader - E-book reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292691 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 03:22:21 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252010] Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300322.l8U3MLmm032343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rpmrebuild - A tool to build rpm file from rpm database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252010 ------- Additional Comments From ansilva at redhat.com 2007-09-29 23:22 EST ------- Ok, my bad. It seems due to the fact that I am a Red Hat employee I need to do the cla_redhat. I have my request in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 05:48:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310641] Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300548.l8U5mQsJ018490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GREYCstoration - An image denoising and interpolation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310641 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk 2007-09-30 01:48 EST ------- Thanks for the comments, both issues fixed in this update. SRPM URL: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/GREYCstoration-2.5.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 05:50:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240169] Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300550.l8U5oHWP015032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: llvm - The Low Level Virtual Machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240169 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-30 01:50 EST ------- FYI ver. 2.1 is out http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:04:25 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300704.l8U74P57027817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-30 03:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > the proper CFLAGS aren't getting passed to the compiler, This applies here. The Makefile.am is broken. It doesn't apply *_CFLAGS correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:05:03 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300705.l8U753qk028234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 03:05 EST ------- Well, * Files under '%_docdir', '%_mandir' are automatically marked as documents, so explicit %doc is not needed. * Some files are not encoded with UTF-8 ----------------------------------------------------------- qwt-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/qwt-5.0.2/html/class_qwt_picker.html qwt-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man3/QwtPicker.3.gz qwt-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/qwt-5.0.2/html/index.html qwt-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/qwt-5.0.2/html/qwt__symbol_8cpp-source.html ----------------------------------------------------------- - At least man file should be encoded with UTF-8 - Also it is preferable that HTML files are encoded with UTF-8 (IMO) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:22:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300722.l8U7MQ5M026366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 03:22 EST ------- Hm very interesting, because I will get only one rpmlint warning about the /usr/share/man/man3/QwtPicker.3.gz file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:27:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300727.l8U7RC0x027024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XGrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 03:27 EST ------- Well. * tarball - It seems that the tarball included in your srpm differs from what is written on Source0. ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost xgrep]$ ls -al *gz */*gz -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 53960 2007-09-16 08:30 xgrep-0.06-1.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 53958 2007-09-30 03:22 xgrep-0.06-2.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 50804 2007-09-15 00:25 xgrep-0.06.tar.gz [tasaka1 at localhost xgrep]$ md5sum *gz */*gz eca0ebe4f25caff7b72d61ded622a23d xgrep-0.06.tar.gz 8fe924cfc104a81660f654b62ddc2f12 xgrep-0.06-1.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz 950405351245928e31e1557ac02d7334 xgrep-0.06-2.fc7/xgrep-0.06.tar.gz ---------------------------------------------------------------- What tarball are you using? (and why do your tarballs change between -1 and -2?) Anyway: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:40:34 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300740.l8U7eYR5028794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2007-09-30 03:40 EST ------- What is the difference between - http://pear.php.net/package/Services_Yadis/ (version 0.2.0) - http://www.openidenabled.com/openid/libraries/php (version 1.0.2) Name are same. So if they are different, we have to handle this using "channel" namespace. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:41:27 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300741.l8U7fRIY028961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 03:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Hm very interesting, because I will get only one rpmlint warning about the > /usr/share/man/man3/QwtPicker.3.gz file. Well, you are not only a person who said that his/her rpmlint does not warn what my rpmlint complained... ex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283931#c6 However, actally /usr/share/doc/qwt-5.0.2/html/index.html is encoded with iso-8859-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 07:56:12 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300756.l8U7uCOb030965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 03:56 EST ------- Just a initial comment (I have not rebuilt your srpm) * First of all, now 0.9 seems released already so please update this. * For license: Current valid list for Fedora in written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Also please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines - In short For GPL, now Fedora requests that you must specify the version (either GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+ or "with exceptions") * Timestamp - For "cp" or "install", please use "-p" option to keep timestamp. * symlink library - Please check is symlinks *.so (not *.so.X or *.so.X.Y) are really needed. * Directory ownership - The directory %{_docdir}/%{name}/ itself should also be owned by this package. - And usually this should be %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. But when you want to change documents directory, you may also have to modify source codes, too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 08:21:26 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 04:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300821.l8U8LQWg002101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 04:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > BTW, simply disabling the debuginfo package isn't usually the right thing to do. > You need to understand why it's ending up empty. Either the package has no > binaries, the proper CFLAGS aren't getting passed to the compiler, or something > is stripping the binaries. All of these indicate some problem with the package. (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > the proper CFLAGS aren't getting passed to the compiler, > > This applies here. The Makefile.am is broken. It doesn't apply *_CFLAGS correctly. > Well I tried to rebuild 2.5.4-2 (a bit modification needed for meaningless line "%debug_package %{nil}") http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=178885 It seems that fedora compilation flags are correctly honored http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=178885&name=build.log But the line: ------------------------------------------------------------ + install -s -m 755 TzClockCairo /var/tmp/tzclock-2.5.4-2.2.fc8-buildroot/usr/bin/TzClock ------------------------------------------------------------ is actually problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 08:26:09 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 04:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300826.l8U8Q9gj003604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 04:26 EST ------- One more note: When I tried to remove "-s" option from "install", the result is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=178880 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=178880&name=build.log ----------------------------------------------------- + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /builddir/build/BUILD/tzclock-2.5.4 extracting debug info from /var/tmp/tzclock-2.5.4-2.1.fc8-buildroot/usr/bin/TzClock 260 blocks ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 09:42:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300942.l8U9ghaH013390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-09-30 05:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) I have removed the -s from the latest tzclock.spec and put the debuginfo back in: http://www.tzclock.org/releases/tzclock.spec Thanks again for all you help. I hope to right this up one day so others can learn from my mistakes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 09:45:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190189] Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300945.l8U9jrAZ014075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt4: Python bindings for Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190189 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |240373 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 09:45:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300945.l8U9jogR014041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |190189, 214193 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 05:45 EST ------- So save space on the repo server I have split the doc to an separate package. So here the new spec file: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 09:53:06 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243501] Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709300953.l8U9r68B010783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot-doc - Documentation of qtiplot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243501 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 05:53 EST ------- The new spec file: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qtiplot-doc.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 12:38:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301238.l8UCcM7L032658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 08:38 EST ------- I think the code of rpmlint is some buggy at this time. We will hope it will be better some times. The next one: SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-doc-5.0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/qsmartcard/qwt-doc.spec?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 13:18:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301318.l8UDIrwq005629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 09:18 EST ------- Just a note: Currently PyQt review request (bug 190189) is now blocked by sip bug (bug 289321) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 13:27:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301327.l8UDRnt3010748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 09:27 EST ------- For HTML file encoding: * Well, iconv is okay, however for HTML files another fix is needed. For example, /usr/share/doc/qwt-5.0.2/html/index.html says: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This "iso-8859-1" string also needs fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 13:31:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301711] Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301331.l8UDVpf0007568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 09:31 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 13:53:04 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 09:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301353.l8UDr4UE013983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 09:53 EST ------- I have read this for some weeks ago. This is the reason on the slow develop of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 14:12:57 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301412.l8UECvaV016718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 10:12 EST ------- fixed, by adding: mv doc/html/qwt__symbol_8cpp-source.html.tmp doc/html/qwt__symbol_8cpp-source.html #replace encoding string at the html files find doc/html/ -name "*.html" | xargs sed -i "s/iso-8859-1/utf-8/g" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 15:07:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312701] Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301507.l8UF7ubT023890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySolFC - A collection of solitare card games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312701 ------- Additional Comments From s.adam at diffingo.com 2007-09-30 11:07 EST ------- I get this too, I thought it was rawhide-specific... On the support forums other users have this problem, however the maintainer uses the same version of python and tkinter as we do and yet his works... Maybe one of our patches is causing the error? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 15:27:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301527.l8UFRS7b026405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-09-30 11:27 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (qwt-doc) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 15:40:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301540.l8UFerTc028309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 11:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qwt-doc Short Description: Documentation of qwt Owners: frankb Branches: FC-6 F7 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 16:04:39 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301604.l8UG4dL3031341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2007-09-30 12:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > the proper CFLAGS aren't getting passed to the compiler, > > > > This applies here. The Makefile.am is broken. It doesn't apply *_CFLAGS correctly. > > > > It seems that fedora compilation flags are correctly honored > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=178885&name=build.log Not for me. This Makefile.am is broken. It uses *_CFLAGS = -DXXX this overrides automake's internal CFLAGS and violates automake working-principles. Correct usage would be: *_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) Further abuse: -DXXX are CPPFLAGS. They do not belong into CFLAGS, they'd belong into *_CPPFLAGS For detail consult the fine manual (info Automake). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 17:39:58 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305551] Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301739.l8UHdwpF011736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluecurve-gtk-themes - Bluecurve GTK+ themes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305551 ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-30 13:39 EST ------- This now has the engine (which was previously covered by bug 305491) rolled into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 17:37:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253549] Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301737.l8UHb5CG011626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TzClock - GTK+ Time Zone Clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253549 ------- Additional Comments From chris at theknight.co.uk 2007-09-30 13:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) >From reading the manual and going on what you are saying the mistake is using *_CFLAGS at all. Because -D is a pre-processor command it should be included in the *_CPPFLAGS. The flags can be modified without causing problems so... TzClockCairo_CPPFLAGS = -DBUILDCAIRO ...is OK and follows the automake rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 17:39:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305491] Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301739.l8UHdJcP007760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk-bluecurve-engine - GTK+ bluecurve engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305491 rstrode at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From rstrode at redhat.com 2007-09-30 13:39 EST ------- Okay, i've rolled gtk-bluecurve-engine into the bluecurve-gtk-themes tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 17:46:11 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313201] New: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313201 Summary: Review Request: aasaver - A screensaver for KDE which presents an ASCII aquarium Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/aasaver.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/aasaver-0.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: KDE Asciiquarium is a KDE screensaver based on Kirk Baucom's fabulous asciiquarium program (http://www.robobunny.com/projects/asciiquarium/). It's a simulation of an animated ocean scene using ASCII art. rpmlint info: E: aasaver configure-without-libdir-spec W: aasaver no-documentation E: aasaver file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/config.kcfg/asciiquarium.kcfg These can all be ignored because: 1. The configure script is NOT a normal configure script 2. There is no documentation 3. It's a KDE configuration file so doesn't reside in /etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 17:50:53 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313211] New: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313211 Summary: Review Request: kbiof - KDE port of the original BIOF XScreenSaver Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kbiof.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/kbiof-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: An OpenGL screensaver for KDE which displays 3D primitives in animated patterns rpmlint info: W: kbiof dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kbiof/common ../common This can be ignored and is normal for most KDE apps because it points to a file in another KDE package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 17:54:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313221] New: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313221 Summary: Review Request: qstars - A screensaver for KDE simulating planets and asteroids in space Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/qstars-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: A screensaver for KDE which simulates planets, asteroids and ships in a moving starfield -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:24:02 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301824.l8UIO2He017773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:23:43 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250924] Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301823.l8UINhT9013784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flashrom - Simple program for reading/writing BIOS chips content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250924 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2007-09-30 14:23 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: flashrom New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:33:50 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301833.l8UIXofr015124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-30 14:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Initial notes, not yet a full review: > > Doesn't Java 1.7 include the StAX APIs and a reference implementation? That > would probably make all dependencies on wstx superfluous. In fact, the package > builds fine with the dependencies removed and no wstx available. I don't have a > setup where this could be tested at runtime, but at least build without wstx > succeeds. > I've indeed tested without wstx and it works, but the reference inplementation is SLOW. When clicking start new game, without wstx it takes 30 seconds for the game to actually start, with wstx only circa 4 seconds. I could do a version without wstx for now and then add wstx once it gets approved, or we could work together to get wstx approved (one as submitter one as reviewer, making the current submitter co-maintainer). > Hardwired Class-Path entries in jar manifests are generally frowned upon, and in > this case they point to stuff in the jars/ subdir which won't exist as > freecol.jar is installed to /usr/share/java and the startup script takes care of > the classpath. So they should be removed. > Agreed, will fix. > The Encoding key in the desktop entry is deprecated, and could be removed. > I didn't know, this is the first time anyone has told me this, is this documented somewhere? > rpmlint: > freecol-manual.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/img2.png > freecol-manual.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/img1.png > freecol-manual.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/img3.png > > Intentional? [hans at shalem freecol]$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/freecol-manual-0.7.2/ total 6304 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 891 2007-09-23 22:06 FreeCol.css -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6035 2007-09-23 22:06 FreeCol.html -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3230763 2007-09-23 22:06 FreeCol.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 687526 2007-09-23 22:06 colony_panel.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 680906 2007-09-23 22:06 europe_panel.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 362 2007-09-23 22:06 img1.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 392 2007-09-23 22:06 img2.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 188 2007-09-23 22:06 img3.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6035 2007-09-23 22:06 index.html Looks like a bug in your version of "javadoc" to me. --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=211381) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=211381&action=view) [edit] > Suggested specfile changes > > This patch gets rid of the wstx dependency as well as the manifest Class-Path > entry. Additionally, if the wstx dep can go indeed, it should be removed from > the startup script too. Thanks for the patch for the ClassPath removal, as for wstx, see above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:44:51 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301844.l8UIipxJ016544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-30 14:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:44:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301844.l8UIiJLG016507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-09-30 14:44 EST ------- Thomas, thanks for taking a look at my package. Indeed, most of the things you pointed out were packaging mistakes and are fixed at: http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes.spec http://hrozkovi.cz/boxes-1.1-2.fc7.src.rpm The only thing I could not reproduce was the error message " Alleged system-wide config file '/usr/share/boxes' is a directory" .. could you please retry? I've tested basic functionality of boxes on F7 i386 and rawhide x86_64 and on both arches it runs fine... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:49:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301849.l8UIns8Q017189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2007-09-30 14:49 EST ------- One final note, the basic functionality test in my case was: $ echo "hello" | boxes -d parchment to make sure that boxes run and are able to display a non-default box -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 18:47:54 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241079] Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301847.l8UIlsm6017080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-DynDoc-1.14.0 - Functions for dynamic documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241079 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-09-30 14:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:03:56 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301903.l8UJ3uBn019246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-30 15:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=211891) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=211891&action=view) Build log snippet about image errors What about bea-stax? That's already in Fedora - is it as slow as wstx? Anyway, I suppose the wstx/bea-stax build dependency could be dropped in any case as the APIs are in icedtea, and if a non-reference implementation is needed at runtime, it's fine to keep the install time Requires. Deprecation of the Encoding desktop entry key: http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec-1.0.html#deprecated-items Recent versions of desktop-file-{install,validate} also warn if they encounter it. Regarding the empty *.png, see attachment for what I see in my mach build log. It doesn't tell me much offhand except that it looks it has nothing to do with javadoc. Perhaps a bug somewhere else or a missing build dependency or something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:07:13 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301907.l8UJ7DIH023515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:20:18 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] New: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Net-IRC.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/perl-Net-IRC-0.75-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Perl implementation of the IRC protocol (RFC 1459). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:20:36 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313271] Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301920.l8UJKapQ021655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IRC - Perl interface to the Internet Relay Chat protocol Alias: perl-Net-IRC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313271 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-Net-IRC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:19:31 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301919.l8UJJVC1021231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-30 15:19 EST ------- I did a full review and I couldn't find a single problem (md5sum matches original, license ok, everything else ok) approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:26:16 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301926.l8UJQGxG026199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-30 15:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > What about bea-stax? That's already in Fedora - is it as slow as wstx? s/as slow as wstx/comparable to wstx/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:28:48 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243688] Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301928.l8UJSmG8026326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qwt-doc The documentation for Qwt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243688 frank-buettner at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner at gmx.net 2007-09-30 15:28 EST ------- build done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:44:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 312371] Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301944.l8UJi11a024817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-ttxtsubs - Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312371 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-30 15:44 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdr-ttxtsubs Short Description: Teletext subtitles plugin for VDR Owners: scop Branches: F-7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 19:56:49 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709301956.l8UJunOj026797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-09-30 15:56 EST ------- rpmlint complains of the license. The DESCRIPTION files says "GPLv2+" but the code itself says: # Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (June, 1991) which I would interpret as overriding whatever DESCRIPTION says. Thus the License: tag should contain "GPLv2", but it would be best if you could contact upstream to clarify. I would suggest that you use the actual upstream site as your URL: http://www.jax.org/staff/churchill/labsite/software/Rmaanova/ I also note that 1.4.1 is out; it seems that it was available a couple of months before you submitted your package but it's only listed at the real upstream site, not the one you have in the URL tag. I don't see any significant changes which would invalidate this review, though, so I'll just work with the current package and you can update it later. You should probably terminate your %description entries with periods. Frankly I can't understand much from the description; maybe I'm just not enough of a statistician. However, what's on the real upstream web site is much more understandable. Perhaps you could consider using it instead. Since this is an arch-specific package, you do not need an explicit dependency on R as rpm will find the libR.so dependency automatically. The test suite warns: * checking for unstated dependencies in R code ... WARNING 'library' or 'require' calls not declared from: snow See the information on DESCRIPTION files in the chapter 'Creating R packages' of the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. I'm not sure what this means or if it's a problem. * source files match upstream: b0f1c1ab439f32fd1d74ef9f359a57aa0c7fdf9d0d0ba5b14a067895d345b24b maanova_1.4.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description is a but * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. X latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. X final provides and requires are sane: maanova.so()(64bit) R-maanova = 1.4.0-2.fc8 = /bin/sh X R (unneeded manual dependency) libR.so()(64bit) ? %check is present; one test warns. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets OK (R module registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 20:21:28 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302021.l8UKLSP3030205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2007-09-30 16:21 EST ------- I've solved the 0 byte image problem, see bug 313301. I will add a BR: xorg-x11-server-utils. As for wstx, I'm afraid bea-stax is as slow as the reference implemantation, since it seems that the 30 sec delay only happens when starting, and there is a please wait dialog there, I'll just do without wstx for now and switch to it when it becomes available. I'll do a new version with the Classpath and wstx removed, and BR xorg-x11-server-utils added tomorrow, now I'm going to bed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 20:34:41 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253909] Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302034.l8UKYf0v002751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpano13 - Library for manipulating panoramic images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253909 ------- Additional Comments From bruno at postle.net 2007-09-30 16:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1) Good to use following syntax in SPEC > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} for -devel and -tools sub packages. Fine, done. > 2) Use make %{?_smp_mflags} Should be ok, though I can't test it, done. > 3)Change %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections. Ok, can't find where this extra field is described, but it seems to be common enough, done. New SPEC and SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/libpano13/libpano13.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~bpostle/reviews/libpano13/libpano13-2.9.12-4.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 20:43:35 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302361] Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302043.l8UKhZOH004081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freecol - The FreeCol multi-player strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302361 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2007-09-30 16:43 EST ------- Sounds good. And confirmed, adding a BR on xorg-x11-server-utils fixes the pngs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 22:23:40 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302223.l8UMNeZW017284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 22:21:19 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313351] New: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jbowes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/mod_wsgi.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/mod_wsgi-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The mod_wsgi adapter is an Apache module that provides a WSGI compliant interface for hosting Python based web applications within Apache. The adapter is written completely in C code against the Apache C runtime and for hosting WSGI applications within Apache has a lower overhead than using existing WSGI adapters for mod_python or CGI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 22:25:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302225.l8UMPtWQ013835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 22:24:05 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313361] New: Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313361 Summary: Review Request: python-zsi - Libraries for developing web services in python Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jbowes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/python-zsi.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/python-zsi-2.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: The Zolara SOAP Infrastructure provides libraries for developing web services using the python programming language. The libraries implement the various protocols used when writing web services including SOAP, WSDL, and other related protocols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 22:29:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302091] Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302229.l8UMTc7K014138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: londonlaw - Online multiplayer version of a well known detective boardgame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302091 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-09-30 18:29 EST ------- * rpmlint: No Problems * Package named correctly: Yes * Patches named correctly: Yes * Spec file named correctly: Yes * Licence(s) acceptable: Yes * Licence field matches: Yes * Licence file installed: Yes (and included upstream) * Spec file in American English: Yes * Source matches upstream: Yes * Locales use %find_lang: N/A * Contains %clean: Yes * %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: Yes * Specfile legible: Yes * Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock/fc6/x86_64) * Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A * Owns directories it creates: Yes * Duplicate files: No * Permissions set correctly: Yes * Consistent macro use: Yes * Separate -doc needed (for large docs): Not Needed * %doc affects runtime: N/A * Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A * .pc files in -devel: N/A * .so in -devel: N/A * -devel requires base: N/A * Contains .la files: N/A * Owns files it didn't create: No * .desktop files included and installed correctly: Yes * Filenames valid UTF8: Yes 1. Uses a "non standard" buildroot. You may wish to change that to: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 2. The README file seems useless to me and probably shouldn't be installed. Other than that, the package seems good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 22:55:22 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302255.l8UMtM1T017772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-09-30 18:55 EST ------- As boxes installs an elisp (.el) file, shouldn't it be packaged according to... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/EmacsenAddOns?highlight=%28emacs%29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 23:03:30 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290431] Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302303.l8UN3UgZ022481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL - Thunder & Lightning - A futuristic action flight simulator game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290431 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 23:02:38 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 290421] Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302302.l8UN2cup018716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TnL-data - Datafiles for Thunder and Lightning https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290421 packages at amiga-hardware.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |packages at amiga-hardware.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 23:07:55 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 305711] Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302307.l8UN7tOM019389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme - Fedora Flying High KDM theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=305711 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2007-09-30 19:07 EST ------- I found one more thing missing here: my color scheme: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/redhat-artwork/devel/FedoraFlyingHigh.kcsrc?rev=1.1&view=markup which Than had added as Source7 to redhat-artwork: Source7: FedoraFlyingHigh.kcsrc ... # color scheme for FedoraFlyingHigh install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE7} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/apps/kdisplay/color-schemes/ ... %{_datadir}/apps/kdisplay/color-schemes/FedoraFlyingHigh.kcsrc This is needed to make the user list look nice in the dark rectangle surrounding it. See the discussion at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239701 (Sorry for not having noticed that sooner. That should be the last lost patch from the KDE side. Crossing fingers...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 23:11:17 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251857] Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302311.l8UNBHJH023768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figlet - ascii banner generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251857 ------- Additional Comments From packages at amiga-hardware.com 2007-09-30 19:11 EST ------- Looks to me like significant parts are not permissable without a rewrite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 23:22:59 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 313371] New: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313371 Summary: Review Request: tempest - An OpenGL screensaver for KDE Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: packages at amiga-hardware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/tempest.spec SRPM URL: http://dribble.org.uk/reviews/tempest-0-0.1.20070929.src.rpm Description: Tempest is a screensaver based on a physical model whereby particles are attracted to their neighbors. rpmlint info: W: tempest no-documentation This is because there is no documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 30 23:37:01 2007 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225761] Merge Review: fonts-chinese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200709302337.l8UNb1qe026844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fonts-chinese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225761 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2007-09-30 19:37 EST ------- Thanks for fonts-chinese-3.03-12.fc8. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.