[Bug 274891] Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Sep 3 09:55:27 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libedit - The NetBSD Editline library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274891
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-03 05:55 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
e8abd1169825efecfccb0f7b4c338bb5 libedit-20070831-2.10.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ libedit.pc files are present.
+ -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ ldconfig scriptlets are used.
+ libedit package ->
Provides: libedit.so.0
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libedit.so.0 libncurses.so.5
rtld(GNU_HASH)
+libedit-devel package ->
Requires: libedit = 2.10-1.20070831cvs.fc8 libedit.so.0 ncurses-devel pkgconfig
+ Not a GUI app.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list