[Bug 252124] Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 4 10:49:43 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: filezilla - FileZilla FTP, FTPS and SFTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252124
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-09-04 06:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Actually "vendor_id" in Fedora guidelines is only used when upstream do not
> already have it... If upstream have it, then it must conform to rule about not
> using a different name. But this vendor field, while mandatory with older
> desktop-file-install version, is also exposed to be deprecated...
>
> There was a recent discution about that on the Fedora-devel mail-list:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01841.html
>
>
But from
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01857.html
it said use current guidelines.
> About __doc, I use it because docs get often installed in the wrong place... But
> when they are in the right place, the problem still appear because the %doc
> macro take his path to begin from %{_builddir} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. So
> this tweak make the %doc macros usuable on installed docs...
>
> For now this tweak is used for only two files, but i expect it must be checked
> when final will be released. Maybe the doc content will be larger then...
>
>
OK.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list