[Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561


pertusus at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pertusus at free.fr




------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-09-08 12:57 EST -------
I am the tetex-tex4ht maintainer, and indeed using ht as a program
name is not a good idea. tetex-tex4ht in fact contains many 
executables, some with trivial names, I'll try to talk to 
upstream. In the mean time I don't know exactly what could be 
done. In debian tex4ht there are much less programs, but 
still ht.

This is also true for ht, upstream should try to find 
a more descriptive name. The %{_bindir} namespace has to be shared
among all the applications, more care should be taken.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.