[Bug 262401] Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401





------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com  2007-09-19 00:17 EST -------
Thanks for the comments.  I changed the name and version number as suggested.

For the javadocs, I just unconditionally build them (because not every arch will
have IcedTea, so the check with %{fedora} is insufficient).  The package
description for the javadocs notes that on systems with sinjdoc, the package
contains nothing useful.

As for the Group tag, I don't understand the problem.  On my machine, there are
64 packages in that group (e.g., axis, bcel, castor, jrefactory), and I
certainly have not installed all of the Java packages available from Fedora. 
Why should the final '/Java' be dropped?

The new files are here:
Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations.spec
SRPM URL:
http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations-0-20060626.1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.