From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 00:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010003.m3103dd6010494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 ------- Additional Comments From kairoaraujo at gmail.com 2008-03-31 20:03 EST ------- http://kairo.freeshell.org/devel/fedora/atop/atop.spec http://kairo.freeshell.org/devel/fedora/atop/atop-1.23-4.fc8.src.rpm [OK] rpmlint spec [OK] rpmlint rpm [OK] rpmlint srpm [OK] rpmlint rpm debuinfo [OK] mock: Done(rpmbuild/SRPMS/atop-1.23-4.fc8.src.rpm) Config(fedora-devel-i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 01:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] New: Review Request: javasqlite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 Summary: Review Request: javasqlite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cdn.verbum.org/javasqlite.spec SRPM URL: http://cdn.verbum.org/javasqlite-20080315-1.fc9.src.rpm %description A Java wrapper including a basic JDBC driver for the SQLite 2/3 database engine. It is designed using JNI to interface to the SQLite API. That API is wrapped by methods in the SQLite.Database class. Since June, 2002, it includes a small JDBC driver, which allows the most basic things to be carried out using the java.sql package. Since September, 2004, SQLite3 (minimum 3.0.7) is supported which is rather experimental. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010305.m3135QGi004921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walters at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-03-31 23:05 EST ------- Basically we iterate the spec, once it's ready there is a final review. At that point you will get a Fedora account, a CVS directory and you can make changes and initiate builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436737] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010312.m313Cd20014899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436737 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2008-03-31 23:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode Short Description: transcodes mime messages Owners: static,limb,remi Branches: F8, F9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:13:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010313.m313DcJL015061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-03-31 23:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436737] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010318.m313IXXk007699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436737 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-03-31 23:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010343.m313hY0D012772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-03-31 23:43 EST ------- So yes, please post a updated .spec and SRPM files after the fixes above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010349.m313nua4022069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-03-31 23:49 EST ------- * Remove %mkrel * (minor) License: tag should be LGPLv2+ From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java * Should Requires: jpackage-utils Let me know when a version with the %mkrel is posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:51:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010351.m313p7TC014392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-03-31 23:51 EST ------- I meant "when a version with the %mkrel fixed is posted." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 03:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010359.m313xpOT015788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-03-31 23:59 EST ------- In a quick glance: * %mkrel problem * BuildRoot needs to have release at least, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 * I don't understand the purpose of the javadoc %pre and %post * Is there a reason the two shell scripts can't be included upstream? (not a requirement, just asking) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010400.m3140etA024584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-01 00:00 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=539324 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=539326 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 5989d22248cce8641c986ed189e4e601 demjson-1.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:04:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010404.m3144mgv017075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 radford at blackbean.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-04-01 00:04 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dkim-milter New Branches: dist-f9, F-8 Looks like I just missed the dist-f9 boat by a few hours. Any chance I can hop on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:09:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010409.m3149bnb026232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-01 00:09 EST ------- dist-f9 boat? The 'devel' branch is currently what will become f9. All packages will be mass branched at some point before f9, and you will get a new F-9 branch thats a copy of devel at that point in time. Then, devel will be what will become F-10. You don't need to do anything for this. You can request an early F-9 branch if you know that you have disruptive changes you don't want to get into F-9 that you would like to check in now, but that seems odd for a new package. Does that make sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010415.m314FflE019396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 radford at blackbean.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010420.m314KuNv028604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-04-01 00:20 EST ------- Yes, that is exactly how I expected things to happen until I got this error. [devel] $ make build /usr/bin/koji build dist-f9 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/dkim-milter/devel#dkim-milter-2_5_1-5_fc9' [...] 541238 build (dist-f9, devel:dkim-milter-2_5_1-5_fc9): open (xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package dkim-milter not in list for tag dist-f9 Maybe something just hasn't propagated to the right place yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436737] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010429.m314T6DL021671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436737 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 00:29 EST ------- php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode-1.5.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436737] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010430.m314UZXF022164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436737 fedora at theholbrooks.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at theholbrooks.org 2008-04-01 00:30 EST ------- Committed and built, thanks again Remi! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 05:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 01:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010518.m315Ikt7030951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 radford at blackbean.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-04-01 01:18 EST ------- Looks like that was the case because it seemed to work after waiting a few hours and retrying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 06:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 02:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010640.m316ef8A023169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-01 02:40 EST ------- Manuel, I've opened a separate bug report for this issue, we can discuss it in bug 439979, so we don't block this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 06:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 02:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010653.m316r3IR025194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-01 02:53 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-demjson Short Description: Python JSON module and lint checker Owners: thm Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 08:27:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 04:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804010827.m318Rsp0004071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 ebmunson at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-04-01 04:27 EST ------- The import and build for FC9 was successful, I am closing this bug with next-release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 10:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011038.m31AcJ6u029446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-04-01 06:38 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package naming satisfies python module naming guidelines - spec file name matches package name - package meets packaging guidelines - license is BSD, matches package - license text not in separate file, but included directly in python source files, which are of course packaged and thus license texts are included in the package - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream (md5sum e15eca1a3ed4d5c0d86370784e552a92) - package builds OK in mock on i386 and x86_64 for Fedora 9 - buildreqs OK - no shared libraries, static libraries, header files, pkgconfig files, or locale files to worry about - package doesn't claim to be relocatable - directory ownership OK - no duplicate files - %defattr(...) present and correct in %files section - %clean section present and correct - %install section properly cleans buildroot first - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - docs don't affect runtime - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - filenames are all ASCII - I haven't tested that the package functions OK as it's basically a library for use with other apps - no scriptlets or subpackages - no file dependencies Suggestions: Use a more specific files list, e.g. %{python_sitelib}/pyPdf* this helps catch future changes that create extra files in the package, which you might want to document further in the changelog etc. Include CHANGELOG in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 11:17:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440010] New: Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440010 Summary: Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/gdevilspie.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/gdevilspie-0.31-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: gdevilspie is a user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon which allows you to create window management rules easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 11:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249352] Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011118.m31BIoYY005462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: popt - C library for parsing command line parameters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249352 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:18:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011418.m31EIlTc013335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(gkriehn at csufresno. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-01 10:18 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:41:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011441.m31EfHVu029196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 tkuratom at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tkuratom at redhat.com 2008-04-01 10:41 EST ------- One other strenuous suggestion: Please query upstream to include a LICENSE file in the package. Especially with the BSD license that has several variants of which one can be problematic ("BSD with advertising"), this can be important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011448.m31EmVbV020854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 gkriehn at csufresno.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(gkriehn at csufresno.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From gkriehn at csufresno.edu 2008-04-01 10:48 EST ------- Sorry -- just got off of spring break and have been catching up on all my grading. If me a week and I'll make adjustments to this. Thanks for feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 14:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011451.m31EpOZF021767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-04-01 10:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > One other strenuous suggestion: Please query upstream to include a LICENSE file > in the package. Especially with the BSD license that has several variants of > which one can be problematic ("BSD with advertising"), this can be important. The license text for this package is actually included in (some of) the source files, and is the 3-clause BSD license without the advertising clause. It may not be possible to have a single license file because not all of the files have the same copyright holders. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:10:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011510.m31FAkG3026954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-01 11:10 EST ------- Wart, still around ? Did upstream get back to you wrt license ? Also, do you want me to fix the scriplets to be as in the guidelines ? I'd like to get this package built and released asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251947] Review Request: libkarma - Library to manage the Rio Karma via TCP/IP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011520.m31FKEtO029259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libkarma - Library to manage the Rio Karma via TCP/IP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251947 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:20 EST ------- This is not mp3 playback, encode or decode. It's just scraping the ID3 tag and mp3 metadata, presumably to make it available in some sort of client. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:19:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011519.m31FJk7k028813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-01 11:19 EST ------- Excellent, I was about to submit this but you beat me to it. Here's the first pass of the review. Many of the following have rationales at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java, and my locale package at http://cachalot.mine.nu/8/SRPMS/javasqlite-20080315-1.fc8.src.rpm should have fixes for most of them. - Group: Libraries: please change to Development/Libraries or System/Libraries - BuildRequires: sqlite-devel missing - Javadocs not built nor packaged - Requires JNI lib -> jar can't be installed in /usr/share/java, install both to %{_libdir}/%{name} instead (see eg. jnipath patch in my package) - Documentation missing, %doc ChangeLog license.terms - Test suite not run during build - Should probably use specific -source argument to javac (eg. -source 5.0) (mostly for gcj) - Dependency on jre (versioned) missing - I think the versioned jar filenames are pretty much pointless (see recent discussion on fedora-devel and fedora-packaging) - GCJ stuff not needed? - $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not honored (see my cflags patch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439015] Review Request: libzend-framework-php - A simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011520.m31FK5O5006502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzend-framework-php - A simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439015 ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-04-01 11:20 EST ------- run rpmlint on your src.rpm, please. Lots of issues there: rpmlint libzend-framework-php-1.5.0-0.src.rpm libzend-framework-php.src:11: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Zend libzend-framework-php.src:24: W: setup-not-quiet libzend-framework-php.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install libzend-framework-php.src: W: no-%build-section libzend-framework-php.src: E: description-line-too-long Zend Framework is a simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 designed to eliminate the tedious details of coding and libzend-framework-php.src: E: description-line-too-long let you focus on the big picture. One of its strengths is the highly modular Model-View-Controller (MVC) design, making your code more reusable libzend-framework-php.src: W: invalid-license http://framework.zend.com/license libzend-framework-php.src: W: strange-permission libzend-framework-php.spec 0666 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:23:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011523.m31FN8xx029994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:23 EST ------- Yeah, that license is not "freely redistributable", which fails to meet the criteria for firmware: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/#BinaryFirmware -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:29:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433422] Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011529.m31FTj4o008292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:29 EST ------- Asking the lawyers on this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011535.m31FZMvr000448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 ------- Additional Comments From kairoaraujo at gmail.com 2008-04-01 11:35 EST ------- Chris, Please change version in spec file and make rebuild src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011536.m31Fa8LR000922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:36 EST ------- Your spec looks a lot more complete; let's just replace this review with yours? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011535.m31FZw6N000759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-01 11:35 EST ------- Yeah, the sync script runs at the top of the hour, so you should only have to wait until the top of the following hour from when cvs was processed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:37:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011537.m31FbOAs001154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:37 EST ------- The Whirlpool implementation is in the Public Domain: http://paginas.terra.com.br/informatica/paulobarreto/WhirlpoolPage.html This is ok. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225804] Merge Review: glib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011538.m31Fcd89010481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225804 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011538.m31FceUh010524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225804, which changed state. Bug 225804 Summary: Merge Review: glib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225804 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425957] Review Request: ufoai-music - UFO: Alien Invasion additional music In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011538.m31Fcv5P010615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-music - UFO: Alien Invasion additional music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425957 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:38 EST ------- Closing as CANTFIX. Feel free to reopen when the rest of the ufoai situation has been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:44:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011544.m31Fi9u6011616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-01 11:44 EST ------- (Assuming we do that) * Would be good to at least have a comment about the status of upstreaming the relevant patches; ideally links to a bug tracker but it doesn't look like upstream has one =/ That's the only issue I saw going through your spec in a first pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 15:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011554.m31FsAdA004961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-01 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Your spec looks a lot more complete; let's just replace this review with yours? Works for me. Would you still like to maintain it or do we switch roles and you become the reviewer? Either way is fine with me, you make the call. (In reply to comment #3) > * Would be good to at least have a comment about the status of upstreaming the > relevant patches; ideally links to a bug tracker but it doesn't look like > upstream has one =/ Yes, I already have a history of submitting patches to javasqlite upstream, and will send the cflags and libtool patches there right now (I thought I already had, but seems I remembered wrong). The jnipath patch is Fedora specific, no need to submit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 16:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011617.m31GHm2M019096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-01 12:17 EST ------- > - License: I use GPLv2+, but some content is licensed under LGPLv2.1+ and LGPLv2+ These are all GPLv2+ compatible, but if you want to be precise, you can write: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ (we don't distinguish between 2.0 and 2.1 in the License tags, the only difference is the name anyway). > - Group: Applications/Internet? Yes, this is fine. > - akregator plugin: This plugin is useless without kdepim. But IMHO > a "Require: kdepim" for the whole package is too much. So the plugin should > maybe splitted into a sub package. Not sure about this one, let's discuss this in the meeting. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 16:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011633.m31GXOSM022352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2008-04-01 12:33 EST ------- Well, that license was added at Mark Webbink's suggestion; since it's not part of the upstream source I can just drop it. The best thing would be a statement from Broadcom Legal saying that redistribution of their firmware is explicitly permitted. But I haven't been able to get a response from them. The debian copyright info file (see comment #1) says: "The BlueZ project has permission from Broadcom Corporation to distribute this firmware in conjunction with the BlueZ GPLd tools, available in Debian as bluez-utils, as long as the notice contained in /usr/share/doc/bluez-firmware/BCM-LEGAL.txt accompanies the firmware." So - maybe these files are freely redisitributable *if* we put them in the bluez-utils package. Or maybe we're OK as long as we're also shipping bluez-utils. Guess I'll try emailing broadcom again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 17:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011735.m31HZIG6004547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-01 13:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > These are all GPLv2+ compatible, but if you want to be precise, you can write: > GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ (we don't distinguish between 2.0 and 2.1 in the License > tags, the only difference is the name anyway). Ok. I'll stick to GPLv2+ then. > Not sure about this one, let's discuss this in the meeting. :-) Decision was to don't require kdepim or create a subpkg but to add a short explanation in %description Spec Url: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/konq-plugins/konq-plugins.spec SRPM Url: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/konq-plugins/konq-plugins-4.0.2-0.2.20080303svn.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: - rebuild for NDEBUG and _kde4_libexecdir - enhance %%description a bit Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=542372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 17:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438156] Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011749.m31Hn44p007096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inksmoto - xmoto level editor for inkscape https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438156 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |436504 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 18:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011824.m31IOKp4016074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 bos at serpentine.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-04-01 14:24 EST ------- This has test failures on Fedora 8 for me. Info: Comparing test-01.unix.known_good.log Info: Against test-01.unix.new.log Error: Test failed - test-01.unix.new.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 18:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011832.m31IWhlQ018426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From bos at serpentine.com 2008-04-01 14:32 EST ------- By the way, I'd suggest naming the package python-svn (same as Debian and Ubuntu), or python-pysvn, instead of plain pysvn. Most Fedora Python packages have a "python-" prefix, and it's irritating to try to guess what a package's name will be when trying to install it, only to get it wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 18:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011859.m31Ix6EY017025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-01 14:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > (same as Debian and Ubuntu), Please don't be based on Debian's naming :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 19:12:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011912.m31JCV0l021206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 ------- Additional Comments From cmadams at hiwaay.net 2008-04-01 15:12 EST ------- Sorry - I apparently re-uploaded the original copy. I bumped the release number just to make sure I didn't do it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 19:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804011925.m31JP9xu025108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-01 15:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 20:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012008.m31K8CPc004330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 ------- Additional Comments From kairoaraujo at gmail.com 2008-04-01 16:08 EST ------- Unofficial Package Review ========================= Spec URL: http://www.cmadams.net/fedora/ufiformat/ufiformat.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cmadams.net/fedora/ufiformat/ufiformat-0.9.4-2.fc8.src.rpm [OK] comment #1 [OK] rpmlint spec [OK] rpmlint rpm [OK] rpmlint srpm [OK] rpmlint rpm debuinfo [OK] mock: Config(fedora-devel-i386) APPROVED (Unofficial) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012111.m31LBQ7b020552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:11 EST ------- python-demjson-1.3-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012114.m31LEUbh027289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:14 EST ------- python-demjson-1.3-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012114.m31LEFi5027246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 ------- Additional Comments From aaronh at garden.org 2008-04-01 17:14 EST ------- "Application"? That's like asking someone to test glibc. Try executing the sample python code and examples in the GNU Enterprise Developer's Guide at: http://gnuenterprise.org/tools/common/docs/ Or in the Open Office document intalled at /usr/share/doc/gnue-common/Developers-Guide.sxw For extra credit create a GNU Enterprise database in MySQL or PostgreSQL. I'm working on packaging other tools of GNU Enterprise that depened on gnue-common. Those will be the better test. I've explained in a specfile comment why the sample configuration files should have noreplace -- users couldn't really use them for anything important, and they upstream authors should be able to update them. I added to the release tag this time: Spec URL: https://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-common.spec SRPM URL: https://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-common-0.6.9-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012122.m31LMZA3029303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-01 17:22 EST ------- I get this error trying to build in mock: config.status: creating Makefile + make -j2 'JAVAC_FLAGS=-source 5.0' LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool /usr/bin/libtool --mode=link gcc -I/usr/include \ -DHAVE_SQLITE2=0 -DHAVE_SQLITE3=1 \ -o native/mkconst native/mkconst.c -lsqlite3 make: *** No rule to make target `SQLite/DBDump.class', needed by `sqlite.jar' . Stop. make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012122.m31LMl6t029354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 ------- Additional Comments From felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu 2008-04-01 17:22 EST ------- Update the package according to comment #7. I can ask upstream if a license file can be included in the upstream tarball but I hope this package can be included in Fedora even without this. Updated files at: http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2008/pypdf/1.10-4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:24:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012124.m31LODue029679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ville.skytta at iki.fi |walters at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-01 17:24 EST ------- For ownership, if you have contacts with upstream it'd probably be better for you to be the primary maintainer, though I do tend to like a collaborative/multi-maintainer style approach. I'll take the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012131.m31LVWrE031423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:31 EST ------- maildrop-2.0.4-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436737] Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012131.m31LVvZl031606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode - Encodes and Decodes MIME messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436737 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:31 EST ------- php-pear-Mail-mimeDecode-1.5.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:31:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012131.m31LVZER031479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.0.4-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012134.m31LYkdN026233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:34 EST ------- themonospot-0.6.5.6-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:33:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012133.m31LXri5025948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot - An Avi parser and content descriptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:33 EST ------- themonospot-0.6.5.6-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438293] Review Request: monosim- Manage your SIM Card contacts with pcsc readers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012134.m31LYbHg026156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monosim- Manage your SIM Card contacts with pcsc readers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438293 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:34 EST ------- monosim-1.3.0.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438293] Review Request: monosim- Manage your SIM Card contacts with pcsc readers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012134.m31LYMa5032618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monosim- Manage your SIM Card contacts with pcsc readers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438293 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:34 EST ------- monosim-1.3.0.2-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 21:38:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012138.m31Lc0BN001537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-01 17:37 EST ------- maildrop-2.0.4-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:11:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439453] Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012211.m31MB63J009245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439453 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-04-01 18:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I normally do that, but given that the first version of spec was not even > building correctly, I decided to re-upload. Please continue as if it were the > first version. Of course, next fixes will feature a release bump and a proper > changelog entry. You're right, it's completely reasonable to stick with the release number here. I'll start the package review as soon as I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012220.m31MKFAR010931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug| |http://bugzilla.gnome.org/sh Tracker URL| |ow_bug.cgi?id=524765 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-04-01 18:20 EST ------- Adding external reference for the report you've created at bugzilla.gnome.org. Do you want me to file the other bug demanding the exclusion of sublib from gnome-subtitles? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012220.m31MKngK011003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-04-01 18:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Update the package according to comment #7. I can ask upstream if a license file > can be included in the upstream tarball but I hope this package can be included > in Fedora even without this. Please do; it's not a blocker though. > Updated files at: http://www.felix-schwarz.name/files/misc/2008/pypdf/1.10-4/ Approved. You can apply for cvsextras membership in the accounts system now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012228.m31MSQxU012228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-01 18:28 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=299981) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=299981&action=view) fix parallel make This patch makes the Makefile.in work in parallel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:29:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012229.m31MTI7E006604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-01 18:29 EST ------- Also, I needed to change the "-source 5.0" to "-source 5"; this is with java version "1.6.0" IcedTea Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b06) IcedTea 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0-b06, mixed mode) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012232.m31MWYdW007369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2008-04-01 18:32 EST ------- And yes, please file a bug report. I'm a bit busy these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 22:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429006] Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012231.m31MVlCI007303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-subtitles - Subtitle editor for Gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429006 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2008-04-01 18:31 EST ------- Well, I don't think exclusion is necessary, but it should be possible to build against a system lib. Keep in mind that both pieces of software seem to be developed by the same people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 1 23:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804012311.m31NBEnW015175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 jorge at konnekt.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org)| ------- Additional Comments From jorge at konnekt.org 2008-04-01 19:11 EST ------- hi, packages updated, accordingly to the comments, sorry for the delay. http://house.konnekt.org/files/software/rpms/perl-Mail-Audit/ thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 00:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020009.m3209gtH025348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at xfs.org 2008-04-01 20:09 EST ------- Sorry my bad. The files have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 00:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020027.m320RtQF028582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mark at fasheh.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-04-01 20:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Mark, where are we at with getting this package into Fedora? Sorry, I got hung up on the contributers agreement. I got approval to agree to it today, so things should go much quicker from now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 03:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020337.m323bQE5018753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-01 23:37 EST ------- Upstream never responded to the licensing question, so I've changed the license to GPLv2 to best match the sources. I also updated the scriplets to use || : on the last command. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/nsca-2.7.2-6.fc8.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/nsca.spec I think we're almost there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 04:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 00:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020429.m324Tsmi027083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-02 00:29 EST ------- I could work on that if you're not already doing it. Looks like JPackage doesn't yet have an rpm for it, but one could probably work off the current 'antlr' spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 05:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020503.m3253jSa014977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-02 01:03 EST ------- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=543385 SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class-0.08010-4.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class.spec Note there are a number of optional tests skipping -- these all run and pass for me on F-8 (with SQL::Translator updated to 0.09000). They're testing the Class::DBI compatibility layer, not core functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 05:53:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020553.m325rd2x023133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |x11vnc-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 07:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 03:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425957] Review Request: ufoai-music - UFO: Alien Invasion additional music In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020709.m3279hfw004022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-music - UFO: Alien Invasion additional music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425957 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-04-02 03:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Closing as CANTFIX. Feel free to reopen when the rest of the ufoai situation > has been resolved. oops, I forgot about this one ... it should have been closed anyway because the additional music is now (version 2.2) part of the main data package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 08:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 04:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804020847.m328lGng023197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-02 04:47 EST ------- looks good, APPROVED. I'm willing to co-maintain this package for EPEL. I don't mind being comaintainer for Fedora too if you wish so. My username is xavierb. Cheers, Xavier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 10:41:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 06:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] New: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/latex2emf.spec SRPM URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/latex2emf-1.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: This program creates EMF files from LaTeX source. It is used by the OpenOffice.org extension "ooolatex" to allow display of LaTeX equations inside Writer and Impress documents Successful koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=543745 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 10:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 06:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021043.m32AhCbs012957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-02 06:43 EST ------- This is a prerequisite for the OOoLaTeX extension: http://ooolatex.sourceforge.net/ which I will open up in a separate review bug soon and make dependent on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 11:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021126.m32BQPdf005335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 11:58:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021158.m32BwJx5012014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu 2008-04-02 07:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyPdf Short Description: PDF toolkit Owners: fschwarz Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 11:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021158.m32BwtQq012210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-02 07:58 EST ------- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines: YES - Spec file matches base package name.: YES - Spec has consistant macro usage. YES - Meets Packaging Guidelines. YES - License: GPLv2+ - License field in spec matches: YES - License file included in package: YES - Spec in American English: YES - Spec is legible.: YES - Sources match upstream md5sum: eb9524064ae48d6a3af0779590ff4ebc rubberband-1.0.1.tar.bz2 - Package needs ExcludeArch: NO - BuildRequires correct: YES (builds correctly in koji/mock, see under SHOULD items) - Spec handles locales/find_lang: N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.: N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.: YES - Package has a correct %clean section. YES - Package has correct buildroot: YES %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content: YES - Doc subpackage needed/used.: NO - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.: YES - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.: YES - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun: YES - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig: YES - .so files in -devel subpackage. - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} : YES - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file: N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. YES (F-8, i386) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. YES - Package owns all the directories it creates. YES - rpmlint output. rpmlint rubberband-1.0.1*.rpm rubberband-devel*.rpm rubberband-devel.i386: W: no-documentation (the warning can be ignored) - final provides and requires are sane (glibc, rpmlib provides removed): rubberband-1.0.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm ladspa-rubberband.so librubberband.so.1 vamp-rubberband.so rubberband = 1.0.1-1.fc8 = /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig libfftw3.so.3 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libsamplerate.so.0 libsamplerate.so.0(libsamplerate.so.0.0) libsndfile.so.1 libsndfile.so.1(libsndfile.so.1.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libvamp-sdk.so.1.1.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) rubberband-devel-1.0.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm rubberband-devel = 1.0.1-1.fc8 = librubberband.so.1 pkgconfig rubberband = 1.0.1-1.fc8 SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock: YES, SRPM builds successfully on koji for f-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=543841 - Should build on all supported archs: YES (see above) - Should function as described. YES: tested on F-8, stretches .wav files nicely - Should have sane scriptlets. YES - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. YES - Should have dist tag YES - Should package latest version YES Issues: None. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 12:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021215.m32CF1bw016065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-02 08:15 EST ------- Neal I would like to review the package but I can't access your site because it is in a port blocked by the firewall here. Could you please place elsewhere with fedorapeople.org being the logical candidate. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 12:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021248.m32CmPFP005556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 13:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021326.m32DQbca030943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-02 09:26 EST ------- OK, done. New version is available: Spec URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 13:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021326.m32DQsqG013769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-02 09:26 EST ------- OK, done. New version is available: Spec URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 13:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021334.m32DY6HG032189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-02 09:34 EST ------- OK, hopefully done: SRPM URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/javahelp2-2.0.05-3.src.rpm Spec URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/javahelp2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 13:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021343.m32Dht9f016802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-02 09:43 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/netbeans-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/libnb-platform7-6.0.1-3.src.rpm Things that I have not changed: %{clusterdir} - it is easier to move NetBeans around, and anyway it is just local variable, not visible from outside. The name libnb-platform7 signals two things: 1. this is just a library, nothing to be executed. It is version 7 of the platform, when we release new incompatible version we make it 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 14:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429703] Review Request: xenner - Xen emulator for kvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021412.m32ECDXT008784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xenner - Xen emulator for kvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429703 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-02 10:12 EST ------- Gerd - I see this has been imported and built in rawhide - please can you close the bug as NEXTRELEASE as described in the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 14:15:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429703] Review Request: xenner - Xen emulator for kvm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021415.m32EFwAF009633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xenner - Xen emulator for kvm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429703 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-04-02 10:15 EST ------- Closing, since Gerd is away currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 14:25:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] New: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jwilson at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/firecontrol/firecontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/firecontrol/firecontrol-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: FireControl, the IEEE 1394 Commander, is a console oriented tool for Linux to access an IEEE 1394 (FireWire) bus. It can issue asynchronous read, write and lock requests to some nodes on the bus, force bus resets, and send PHY packets. Furthermore, it provides bus reset notifications. The main advantage of this tool over other available tools (like gscanbus) is (besides not requiring a graphical interface) that it reports the exact acknowledge and response codes and, therefore, is very useful for debugging purposes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 15:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021527.m32FRJwC025963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2008-04-02 11:27 EST ------- There are a few unversioned porvides/obseletes: tomcat6.src:129: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp tomcat6.src:130: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jsp21 tomcat6.src:155: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes servletapi6 tomcat6.src:156: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servletapi6 tomcat6.src:157: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet tomcat6.src:158: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet6 tomcat6.src:159: W: unversioned-explicit-provides servlet25 license should be ASL 2.0, and rpmlint will stop complaining coreutils doesn't need to be listed as BuildRequires. Shouldn't the content in the docs-webapp package be marked as %doc? in tomcat6-6.0.wrapper, /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions is sourced without a check if it exists. With regards to the issues that you mentioned earlier: - use of /srv - this is fixed, right? - initscript does not use standard start/stop functions (e.g., `daemon') - what was the reason that we do not use the standard start/stop functions? - upstream shell scripts do not find Java according to JPackage standard - are these fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 15:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] New: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~rmeggins/fedora-ds-dsgw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~rmeggins/fedora-ds-dsgw-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Fedora Directory Server Gateway is a collection of 3 web applications that run on top of the Administration Server used by the Directory Server. These 3 applications are: * phonebook - a simple phonebook application geared towards end users, with simple search screens and simple self-service management * orgchart - an organization chart viewer * gateway - a more advanced search interface that allows admins to create and edit user entries, and allows creation of templates for different types of user and group entries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 15:48:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021548.m32FmJbS011351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us, | |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |fedora-ds-dsgw ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-02 11:48 EST ------- Notes: Clean output from rpmlint on src.rpm Clean output from rpmlint on binary rpm Builds cleanly in mock on F-8 Installs cleanly into an existing fedora-ds installation on F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 16:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021609.m32G98am003804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-02 12:09 EST ------- Jason Corley suggested in comment #20 doing something with the unversioned jsp and servlet provides. Are these backwards compatible or not? Otherwise, why even keep them at all. I am not sure that we can version the other provides since the version is the tomcat version, which would not be the case with some other API provider, presumably. The license was ASL 2.0 in the past rpms. I changed it back to what JPackage had. This seems correct according to the Fedora wiki. I think rpmlint is just wrong here. I will fix the coreutils BuildRequires. I don't think we can mark the doc webapp as doc. We can't mark any content needed to run as doc. Docs must be 100% optional. We usually check for the existence of /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions first. I can do this, but why? We already Requires: jpackage-utils, so it must exist. /srv is fixed The other two are more complicated. I find java using java-functions, but I left most of the script the same as JPackage. It is probably fine, but it could use java-functions more. About the initscript, I changed most of what I could. The reason we can't necessarily use the built-in killproc function is that: (1) we had to call "stop" to stop the server---but Jason Brittain told me that tomcat should do the right thing when it receives a KILL signal (I haven't verified this) (2) if the PID file is missing, it will try to find the tomcat6 process (clearly wrong, it's some java process), and I don't know how the PID file will go missing in practice. For startup, maybe we could use the daemon function? Right now it's hardcoded to call runuser if it exists and su if not. The main issue is that the initscript is not using the standard functions making the code large and difficult to maintain. For example, the initscript output was broken because it was overriding some built-in functions from /etc/init.d/functions. Jason Corley told me that most of this was due to incompatibilities in the Fedora and RHEL functions, but I would rather write the script in the standard way and deal with this problem if/when it arises for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 16:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021641.m32GfRPN011749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 ------- Additional Comments From kairoaraujo at gmail.com 2008-04-02 12:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/atop/atop.spec SRPM URL: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/atop/atop-1.23-5.fc8.src.rpm - improved atop.d and atop.crondaily (Manuel Wolfshant) [OK] rpmlint spec [OK] rpmlint rpm [OK] rpmlint srpm [OK] rpmlint rpm debuinfo [OK] mock: Done(rpmbuild/SRPMS/atop-1.23-5.fc8.src.rpm) Config(fedora-devel-i386) Tests with cron.daily and daemon: [kairo at f8dev01eav ~]$ sudo su - [root at f8dev01eav ~]# service atop status atop is stopped [root at f8dev01eav ~]# /etc/cron.daily/atop [root at f8dev01eav ~]# service atop status atop is stopped [root at f8dev01eav ~]# service atop start Starting atop: [ OK ] [root at f8dev01eav ~]# service atop status atop (pid 22212) is running... [root at f8dev01eav ~]# /etc/cron.daily/atop [root at f8dev01eav ~]# service atop status atop (pid 22242) is running... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 17:58:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021758.m32HwvbK006602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-02 13:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 17:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021755.m32HtimD006092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-02 13:55 EST ------- Thanks for those fixes. http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/javasqlite.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/javasqlite-20080401-1.fc9.src.rpm * Wed Apr 2 2008 Ville Skytt? - 20080401-1 - Update to 20080401. - Patch to install *.so as an unversioned module. - Patch to fix parallel make (#439941, Colin Walters). - Build with "-source 5" instead of "-source 5.0" (#439941, Colin Walters). - Use %%{_jvmdir} instead of %%{_prefix}/lib/jvm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 18:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021800.m32I08ju007059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-02 14:00 EST ------- The -2.src.rm you have made available still includes the previous version of the spec file. The uploaded spec is OK however and using it makes mock happy. No, a couple of small issues: The correct license, according to the .py files included in the tar.gz is GPLv2+. It would be awesome if you could use a single directory for all docs. Now some of them are under /usr/share/doc/gnue-common while others are in /usr/share/doc/gnue-common-0.6.9/. Not mandatory, but nicer. The changelog has a "%config" (second to last line in release 2) which triggers a rpmlint warning, please replace it with "%%config". Otherwise everything seems fine, I'll post a full review as soon as I manage to verify that it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 18:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021844.m32IitJW003949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2008-04-02 14:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Jason Corley suggested in comment #20 doing something with the unversioned jsp > and servlet provides. Are these backwards compatible or not? Otherwise, why even > keep them at all. I am not sure that we can version the other provides since the > version is the tomcat version, which would not be the case with some other API > provider, presumably. > It seems Jason Corley suggested versioning of provides/obsoletes, unversioned will match any versioned provides/obsoletes. For the ones that are the tomcat version, should the version be the same as the tomcat version then? > The license was ASL 2.0 in the past rpms. I changed it back to what JPackage > had. This seems correct according to the Fedora wiki. I think rpmlint is just > wrong here. > I think rpmlint has been updated with the new license format. > I will fix the coreutils BuildRequires. > Great! > I don't think we can mark the doc webapp as doc. We can't mark any content > needed to run as doc. Docs must be 100% optional. > OK. > We usually check for the existence of /usr/share/java-utils/java-functions > first. I can do this, but why? We already Requires: jpackage-utils, so it must > exist. > I saw it in the other scripts, and this one is missing, so I thought that should be here too. > /srv is fixed > > The other two are more complicated. I find java using java-functions, but I left > most of the script the same as JPackage. It is probably fine, but it could use > java-functions more. > > About the initscript, I changed most of what I could. The reason we can't > necessarily use the built-in killproc function is that: (1) we had to call > "stop" to stop the server---but Jason Brittain told me that tomcat should do the > right thing when it receives a KILL signal (I haven't verified this) (2) if the > PID file is missing, it will try to find the tomcat6 process (clearly wrong, > it's some java process), and I don't know how the PID file will go missing in > practice. > > For startup, maybe we could use the daemon function? Right now it's hardcoded to > call runuser if it exists and su if not. > > The main issue is that the initscript is not using the standard functions making > the code large and difficult to maintain. For example, the initscript output was > broken because it was overriding some built-in functions from > /etc/init.d/functions. Jason Corley told me that most of this was due to > incompatibilities in the Fedora and RHEL functions, but I would rather write the > script in the standard way and deal with this problem if/when it arises for us. > Sounds good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 18:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021846.m32Ikh7X017499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-02 14:46 EST ------- Please use these links instead: Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-ds-dsgw.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-ds-dsgw-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Fedora Directory Server Gateway is a collection of 3 web applications that run on top of the Administration Server used by the Directory Server. These 3 applications are: * phonebook - a simple phonebook application geared towards end users, with simple search screens and simple self-service management * orgchart - an organization chart viewer * gateway - a more advanced search interface that allows admins to create and edit user entries, and allows creation of templates for different types of user and group entries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 19:12:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021912.m32JCxsJ022539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-02 15:12 EST ------- For the versioned provides, Jason Corley suggested using the spec version. To use the tomcat version doesn't make sense (what about other vendors' implementation of the spec?). I think, if anything, we should use the spec/API version. He also didn't suggest versioning the provides that already have a number in them (e.g., `6' or `25'), although 6 is the tomcat major version. But I am not clear what to do to resolve this issue now. The rpmlint config has Apache License, Apache Software License, and ASL 2.0, but not Apache Software License 2.0, but I think this should be allowed based on the wiki. The initscript changes will need testing. However, none of the default functions seem to work properly if the process name is not unique. In our case `java' could identify any number of processes, not just tomcat processes. For example, I implemented a workaround to the status function based on JPackage. The difference is that I try to use the built-in function where possible. The killproc function has a similar problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 19:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804021920.m32JKeLO024334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-02 15:20 EST ------- Builds fine in mock now, spec looks good according to the guidelines. Marking as reviewed. I'd still like a comment above the patches stating their current upstream status (and comment the non-upstreamable loadLibrary patch specifically), but that's not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 20:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804022012.m32KCLdx022626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-02 16:12 EST ------- Thanks. Will add patch statuses before the first build. Here's the request for branches I'm interested in. Please feel free to request co-maintainership for branches you're interested in in pkgdb once this is in (I don't know your FAS username and the search doesn't seem to work so I can't do it right now), or request additional ones in case you're interested in some that are not listed here. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: javasqlite Short Description: SQLite Java Wrapper/JDBC Driver Owners: scop Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 21:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804022100.m32L0iMW002956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-02 17:00 EST ------- Well done, Kairo. Please remove the references to DATALIFE (this variable is no longer used anywhere in your scripts, as far as I can see) and go ahead with CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 21:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804022127.m32LRCox022192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-02 17:27 EST ------- I checked for BuildRequires: coreutils and it's not there. There is a Requires(preun) on it for the lib package since it calls rm in %preun lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 2 21:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804022137.m32LbbwT024396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-02 17:37 EST ------- Kairo, if you do not mind, please include branches for EL-4 and EL-5 in your CVS request. I'll be glad to co-maintain with you (or maintain) them if you do not have the time or interest to take care of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 00:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/xorg-x11-drv-geode.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.8.0-1.fc8.src.rpm amd driver was renamed to geode. xorg-x11-server already used the new name. No code changes that matter since the previous rawhide version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 00:31:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030031.m330Vb8r030049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 00:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030039.m330djtc032259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-02 20:39 EST ------- Tom, I'm wondering if you know anything about this. I just noticed too the LICENSE.txt in the jogl source has this note: NOTE: The Original Code (as defined below) has been licensed to Sun Microsystems, Inc. ("Sun") under the SGI Free Software License B (Version 1.1), shown above ("SGI License"). Pursuant to Section 3.2(3) of the SGI License, Sun is distributing the Covered Code to you under an alternative license ("Alternative License"). This Alternative License includes all of the provisions of the SGI License except that Section 2.2 and 11 are omitted. Any differences between the Alternative License and the SGI License are offered solely by Sun and not by SGI. Were the 2.2 and 11 the problematic sections? From looking at the FSF's web site on this, 2.2 and 11 look like the objectionable parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 00:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252082] Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030053.m330rrDW025279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252082 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |walters at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-02 20:53 EST ------- Taking this. + Builds OK in mock * I'd change the %description for the javadoc and manual to be a little bit better; just "Javadoc for %{name}" and "Manual for %{name} is fine. * Can we rm -f the shipped jar files instead of just moving them? * Do we really need the %pre/%post for the javadoc? I don't see that in the current Java guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 01:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 21:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030121.m331LOpH030162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From pauljohn at ku.edu 2008-04-02 21:21 EST ------- On Fedora 8, I found texlive-xetex would not install without dvipdfmx, but there was no such package available. I downloaded the version from koji and installed everything OK. But I think you should put dvipdfmx in the Fedora 8 repository if you have texlive-xetex require it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 02:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030224.m332OvT8008537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME Alias: labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-04-02 22:24 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: labyrinth New Branches: F-9 Please early-branch for F-9. I'd like to update Fedora's packaging to the recently-released 0.4 release; but since it introduces a slew of new features and bug-fixes (and we are in feature freeze), I'd like to keep F-9 (current devel) at 0.3 until I can be sure that migrating to 0.4 won't pose an issue and won't break anything, etc. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 04:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439588] Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030435.m334Z7H2002170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439588 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-04-03 00:35 EST ------- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean on SRPM, RPM and installed package OK - is a Ruby library and follows Ruby Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec OK - package meets Packaging Guidelines and Ruby Packaging Guidelines + Are the following needed even after explicit requirements are placed on the ABI? BuildRequires: ruby Requires: ruby OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is provided + Is the -doc sub-package really needed? Can't we have the examples in the main package itself? The size of the main package is 29K and that of -doc is 6.1K. After installation the -doc package adds only 40K. OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text + Upstream could be requested to clarify the version of GPL. xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets not needed OK - subpackage need not require base package + If it is decided to have a separate -doc package, its presence can be mentioned in the description of the base package. OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 04:35:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439588] Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030435.m334ZXs3013607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439588 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 06:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439588] Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030605.m3365DFi027893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439588 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-03 02:05 EST ------- Thank you! CVS request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-aws Short Description: Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 06:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030637.m336bhNB000683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: smc-fonts - |Review Request: smc-fonts - |malayalam opentype fonts |malayalam opentype fonts ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-03 02:37 EST ------- All subpackages owning /usr/share/fonts/smc-fonts folder since these all fonts are for malayalam script only and no need different folder for each subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 06:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] New: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The smc-fonts package contains fonts for the display of malayalam Scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 07:46:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 03:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030746.m337k48h012730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rbhalera at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 09:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804030925.m339Pqfo000468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-03 05:25 EST ------- Until the package gets to Fedora, work gets done in another place. You can get the package sources from Mercurial repo: hg clone ssh://fedorapeople.org//home/fedora/lkundrak/repo/opengrok The built binaries appear here: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/opengrok/ http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/opengrok-el5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 10:38:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 06:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] New: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-lzo.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/python-lzo-1.08-1.fc8.src.rpm Koi Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=545850 Description: Python bindings for lzo compression libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 10:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 06:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031058.m33AwPL6005066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 06:58 EST ------- 1)Remove 2 times written README from following line %doc COPYING NEWS README README 2)Change %files section line from %{python_sitelib}/lzo.so to %{python_sitelib}/* 3)You need to add BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel 4)License is GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 11:02:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031102.m33B2woT017303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 07:02 EST ------- %install should have %{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT as per given in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#head-b0fc6f14e88db17db3633889f31880adcefb9cb8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 11:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031136.m33BaumX023203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 07:36 EST ------- I rechecked egginfo guidelines and found that you don't need BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel for F9 and above as its automatically generating egginfo You need to provide egginfo for Message-ID: <200804031139.m33BdmA0012183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 07:39 EST ------- provide updated SRPM for further review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 11:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031158.m33Bwlx2015851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2008-04-03 07:58 EST ------- I see what you mean now, adding the number for the provides that doesn't have a number in it. I think adding the spec numbers in those cases is the best that we can do for now. If you run rpmlint -I invalid-license, you'll see the list of valid licenses, and ASL 2.0 is one of them. Hmm... so the built-in functions as they are won't work with java in general then. Looking at the status function (in 1jpp.6.fc9 rpm), if we have tomcat5 running at the same time, will that work properly if we do a pgrep with those parameters? The coreutils as a Requires(preun) is fine, thanks for checking that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 12:13:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031213.m33CDm5R030781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-03 08:13 EST ------- 1.The variable name for font directory is better be used as fontdir instead of xfontdir. 2. "%{_datadir}/fonts" should not be defined as fontdir, since %{_datadir}/fonts/smc-fonts is anyway being used as a common font directory for all packages, it should be the fontdir. Another problem with this is, the fc-cache in %post section is being run on %{_datadir}/fonts, resulting caching of all the fonts in /usr/share/fonts. Thus take care that the fc-cache runs on the intended directory only. 3. 'Source' should have been the direct download link to the upstream archive. 4. 'URL' should point to the projects homepage. In this case the savanna homepage for the smc project should be ok. 5. The installed font directory should have proper permissions defined as per given in the Font SIG's spec template. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/SpecTemplate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 12:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031246.m33CkWjG025810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-03 08:46 EST ------- + spec file is legible + spec file name is OK + package name is OK = trailing spaces in Summary: + License: matches upstream and is acceptable + URL: is OK + Source: match upstream : 5081067743a516312dcf6a5c2b15db8e + latest version is packaged = additional source generation is explained and can be reproduced, however the tarball doesn't have the same MD5 hash as in the SRPM. = the generated tarball name should be prefixed with the package name + BuildRoot: is OK = the sed command would be better suited in the %%prep section, but it may not be easily doable, I didn't look closely + macro usage is consistent + builds fine in mock F8 i386 + all test succeed + docs are included and are not needed for the soft to run + package owns the dirs it creates + rpmlint output is empty + final Provides: looks good + final Requires: looks good - BR:s perl(ExtUtils::Command::MM) perl(ExtUtils::MY) are not needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 12:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031252.m33CqkiF026928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xavier at bachelot.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 13:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031323.m33DNlsQ000587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 kairoaraujo at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kairoaraujo at gmail.com 2008-04-03 09:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: atop Short Description: An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level Owners: kairo Branches: F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 13:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031322.m33DMjW5000459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 ------- Additional Comments From kairoaraujo at gmail.com 2008-04-03 09:22 EST ------- Manuel, I've interest in maintain this package on EL. I work with EL and this packages is very good for troubleshooting. Thanks again. Spec URL: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/atop/atop.spec SRPM URL: http://kairo.fedorapeople.org/atop/atop-1.23-6.fc8.src.rpm - removed variable DATALIFE from atop.d and atop.crondaily [OK] rpmlint spec [OK] rpmlint rpm [OK] rpmlint srpm [OK] rpmlint rpm debuinfo [OK] mock: fedora-devel-i386 epel-4-i386 epel-5-i386 Requesting CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 13:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031334.m33DYHFJ002441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-03 09:34 EST ------- done the changes as suggested :) please see the updated files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 13:37:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031337.m33Dbns2014823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-03 09:37 EST ------- No, the whole darned license is problematic. Nothing under anything FreeB derived is ok for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 13:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031338.m33DcNnl014958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 13:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031338.m33Dc2Gj003527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 14:26:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031426.m33EQ5B1014902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-03 10:26 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubberband Short Description: Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 14:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031442.m33EgjeZ018065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(timothy.selivanow@| |virtualxistenz.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-03 10:42 EST ------- Okay. * This package itself is okay * Your pre-reviews seem good for initial comments. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pysvn) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. ! Note: In FAS process there may be some procedure different from what is written in "Join" wiki If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 14:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031446.m33EkSQa019206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-03 10:46 EST ------- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines: YES - Spec file matches base package name.: YES - Spec has consistent macro usage. YES - Meets Packaging Guidelines. YES - License: GPLv2+ - License field in spec matches: YES - License file included in package: YES - Spec in American English: YES - Spec is legible.: YES - Sources match upstream md5sum: MD5(OOoLatexEmf_noarch_src.tar.gz)= ad1ab04077828e91a4df906a850bc013 - Package needs ExcludeArch: NO - BuildRequires correct: YES (builds correctly in koji/mock, see under SHOULD items) - Spec handles locales/find_lang: N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.: N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.: YES - Package has a correct %clean section. YES - Package has correct buildroot: YES %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content: YES - Doc subpackage needed/used.: NO - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.: YES - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. YES (F-9, x86_64) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. YES - Package owns all the directories it creates. N/A - rpmlint output. rpmlint latex2emf-1* : clean - final provides and requires are sane (glibc, rpmlib provides removed): yes SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock: YES - Should build on all supported archs: YES (see above) - Should function as described. YES: tested on F-9. Works on one source file, breaks on another: "cannot get font size for ..." - Should have sane scriptlets. YES - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. N/A - Should have dist tag YES - Should package latest version YES Issues: Breaks on the one file I mentioned; documentation does not specify usage (-bb ? -transp ?). But these are issues for upstream. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 15:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439015] Review Request: libzend-framework-php - A simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031539.m33FdZqx003755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzend-framework-php - A simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439015 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2008-04-03 11:39 EST ------- This looks like a duplicate of bug #421241 where the spec is, at first sight, in a much better shape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 15:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031540.m33FeCnF015721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-03 11:40 EST ------- After a bit of a delay, here is the package with the -devel bits removed: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/guichan06-0.6.1-6.fc8.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/guichan06.spec I'm also ready to build guichan-0.7.1 for Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 15:57:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433477] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031557.m33Fv2Vn024296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-03 11:57 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:02:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031602.m33G2rKm026082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-03 12:02 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226218] Merge Review: openssh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031604.m33G4TIo026636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openssh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226218 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |openssh-4.5p1-5.fc7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031610.m33GAh5q018816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 skvidal at linux.duke.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skvidal at linux.duke.edu ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-04-03 12:10 EST ------- As mentioned on this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439015 maybe y'all can collaborate on one packaging of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031614.m33GEwKq032764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-03 12:14 EST ------- Looks good, but since this now is a compat package (iow no devel, nothing in the distro is building against, only made available for binary compatibility for old apps if they need it), it should get the compat- back in its name. Also I think we should only build this for F-8 and F-7, as we try not to keep too much compat packages around in general. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031627.m33GRuGn026463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-03 12:27 EST ------- Rebuild failed at least on i386: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=546584 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031635.m33GZo8w030028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 ------- Additional Comments From aaronh at garden.org 2008-04-03 12:35 EST ------- License changed, and put the docs under a single directory using a bit of a hack. I didn't know you could run rpmlint on SRPM files. Good to know. Spec URL: http://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-common.spec SRPM URL: http://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-common-0.6.9-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 16:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031650.m33GofND015446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-03 12:50 EST ------- Yes, i agree "sed" should be in %prep But sed applies on Makefile created in %build and i don't succeed to patch the Makefile.PL (PL_FILES directive cannot be used to pass options). I think MD5 on additionnal source is different because of user/group stored in the archive. Other comments fixed in : Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Entities.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Entities-0.02-2.fc8.src.rpm Scratch build in koji (i forget to bump the release before building): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=546590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 17:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031752.m33Hq0oU012081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-03 13:51 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: qt New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 17:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440473] New: Review Request: xosview - An X Window System utility for monitoring system resources Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440473 Summary: Review Request: xosview - An X Window System utility for monitoring system resources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview.spec SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview-1.8.3-5.fc8.src.rpm Description: The xosview utility displays a set of bar graphs which show the current system state, including memory usage, CPU usage, system load, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 17:53:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031753.m33HrROO032763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 13:53 EST ------- The java package guidelines have been passed by the packaging folks, and approved by FESCO. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java (will likely be moved from PackagingDrafts to Packaging soon). Can you please re-check this package against the approved guidelines? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 17:56:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031756.m33HubmY002710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-04-03 13:56 EST ------- FYI, new spec and SRPM as a result of April 2 protocol bump by Yahoo: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2.spec http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2-0.7.5-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 17:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031758.m33Hwdvg015787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language Alias: tzdata-java-epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 13:58 EST ------- Is the License tag right here? The main 'tzdata' package which uses the same upstream as this has a different tag... Also, can you check and make sure this conforms to the just approved java guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031814.m33IEek0026974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-03 14:14 EST ------- I think that adding `Provides: servlet = servlet_spec_version' should be OK. I don't think we need to use <= since we only have to satisfy unversioned requires in practice. Re-reading the wiki, it seems that only the short name is allowed for licenses. This means we have to diverge from JPackage here. It does appear that the pgrep will *not* work properly in the presence of multiple tomcat instances being run by the tomcat user. In my current initscript, I changed this from the default behavior to be a fallback only, but I think that it's likely dangerous to have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:26:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031826.m33IQ2nG002332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-03 14:26 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, Ray. Some remarks before review. * You must specify full path to source's tarball, not only %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2. For SF-hosted projects we have special requirements for %Source field - take a look at this page (at the bottom): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * You should change your BuildRoot to something like BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * Change these two lines: iconv -c -t UTF8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.utf8 || : iconv -c -t UTF8 NEWS > NEWS.utf8 %{__mv} AUTHORS.utf8 AUTHORS %{__mv} NEWS.utf8 NEWS I recommend you to use something like: iconv -c -t UTF8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.utf8 && %{__mv} AUTHORS.utf8 AUTHORS because if iconv fails you won't destroy all contents of your original file. Not a very probable scenario but still... * Create a backups of patched files by using key -b. For example: %patch0 -p1 -b .fh %patch1 -p1 -b .protocol Other things looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031828.m33ISVdT021050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428352] Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031829.m33ITY4d021627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-idm-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:29:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428357] Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031829.m33ITwbO004731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console Alias: fedora-ds-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428357 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:29:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031829.m33IT5Dh004333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:41:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428364] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031841.m33IfmBU012115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Alias: fedora-ds-admin-cons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031842.m33IgHT2012269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429712] Review Request: ipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031842.m33IglKM029318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429712 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 18:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031855.m33ItorQ020702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-03 14:55 EST ------- builds fine in mock on rawhide x86_64 %dir %{_localstatedir}/run/%{pkgname}/dsgw/cookies should be %{_localstatedir}/run/%{pkgname}/dsgw sha1sum fedora-ds-dsgw-1.1.0.tar.bz2 fedora/SOURCES/fedora-ds- d33144d8e1e26a08dd145d71a65c4082bb9b1dc2 fedora-ds-dsgw-1.1.0.tar.bz2 d33144d8e1e26a08dd145d71a65c4082bb9b1dc2 fedora/SOURCES/fedora-ds- sources match upstream. Fix the one unowned directory issue and it looks good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 19:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031913.m33JDRHi030161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2008-04-03 15:13 EST ------- I agree that it's likely dangerous to have that pgrep in there, can you think of a better way to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 19:18:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031918.m33JIeeP018564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-03 15:18 EST ------- The best way is the default way where we record the PID and then use that directly. The fallback method is supposed to be used in the case of a missing PID file (I am not sure when this would even happen). The default function may suffer from a similar problem (see killproc and __pids_pidof in /etc/init.d/functions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 19:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031925.m33JPn0c003955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-04-03 15:25 EST ------- Fixed silly errors with cmake macro (i wonder why it works at home). Could you try this update, please? Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 19:28:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031928.m33JS4EQ004311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-03 15:28 EST ------- Fixed. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06-0.6.1-7.fc8.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06.spec I agree that this should only exist for F8 and F7. Nothing will require it in F9, so there won't be any need to build it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 19:37:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031937.m33JbCwk006291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-03 15:37 EST ------- Ok. Done. Updated the links above. Builds fine in mock on rawhide i386 too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 19:38:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804031938.m33Jcb7S006590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-03 15:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-ds-dsgw Short Description: Fedora Directory Server Gateway - web applications for Fedora Directory Server. Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032007.m33K7ubK012977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-03 16:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nsca Short Description: Nagios passive check daemon Owners: wart, xavierb Branches: F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188180] Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032009.m33K99K5013123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt4: Qt GUI toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188180 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:13:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032013.m33KD2pw014013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216363] Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032010.m33KArmi031027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: labyrinth - Simple but powerful mind-mapping software for GNOME Alias: labyrinth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216363 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:10 EST ------- Thanks for thinking of the freeze. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032016.m33KGM3Q032159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language Alias: tzdata-java-epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:16 EST ------- Per IRC conversation with Lubomir, the main tzdata package has an incorrect license tag, and he's going to file a bug on it. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:19:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032019.m33KJ3qS015191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032023.m33KNK1K016197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439588] Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032021.m33KLBAf000970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439588 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032025.m33KPH0Z016937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-03 16:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032032.m33KW9dF003431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-03 16:32 EST ------- Disabling the tests on rhel 4 is not acceptable. I assume you disabled them because they are failing, but this is not the proper workaround, they are most probably failing for a reason. Remove this and I'll approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 20:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032033.m33KXvmC003654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language Alias: tzdata-java-epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 16:33 EST ------- Well, when I did the merge review for tzdata we talked about the license; perhaps someone could let me know what is incorrect about the discussion in bug 226509. Bottom line: there is LGPL code in the source package but that code is only used in building and none of it is present in the binary package; all that's left is public domain data. Since the License: tag refers only to the final binary package, that should be correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:16:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032116.m33LGxhQ027901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-03 17:16 EST ------- Rawhide build done, F-8 in progress. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=44865 Will look into building for EPEL-5 next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33Lnu44002673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252106 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252106] Review Request: servletapi6 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33LntNN002653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi6 - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252106 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252080] Review Request: jakarta-poi - Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33Lnu3V002701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-poi - Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252080 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33LnvW5002722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252080 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252098] Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33Lnw5u002755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jacorb - Free Java implementation of OMG's CORBA standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252098 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33LnxTg002793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227088 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo1VP002860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252049 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227088] Review Request: mojo-maven2-plugins-1.0-2jpp - Maven2 plugin set from mojo.codehaus.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032149.m33LnxDh002780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mojo-maven2-plugins-1.0-2jpp - Maven2 plugin set from mojo.codehaus.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227088 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252049] Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo0e4002818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252095] Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo252003163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hessian - Hessian binary web service protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252095 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252092] Review Request: swarmcache - Cluster-aware Caching for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo3d1003253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swarmcache - Cluster-aware Caching for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252092 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo4hL003273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252092 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo5sr003298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252059] Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo7vU003336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) Alias: derby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252059 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo8Kf003356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252059 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252093] Review Request: xercesjarv - JARV driver for Xerces-2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoAxD003407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xercesjarv - JARV driver for Xerces-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252093 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227073] Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lo907003378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time-1.2.1-1jpp - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227073 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252050] Review Request: aspectwerkz - AOP for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoDQO003463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspectwerkz - AOP for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252050 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252048] Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoBq1003437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252048 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252051] Review Request: avalon-excalibur - Java development components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoJ6m003699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avalon-excalibur - Java development components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252051 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252107] Review Request: snmptrapappender - SNMP Trap Appender extension for log4j In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoEfM003577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: snmptrapappender - SNMP Trap Appender extension for log4j https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252107 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227051] Review Request: easymock-1.2-1jpp - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoFS0003608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: easymock-1.2-1jpp - Easy mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227051 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252083] Review Request: jdbm - JDBM transactional persistence engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoHUx003646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jdbm - JDBM transactional persistence engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252083 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252054] Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoIRR003673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: c3p0 - JDBC DataSources/Resource Pools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoKXV003720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252051 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoGEZ003621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227051 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252062] Review Request: ehcache - Easy Hibernate Cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoMFR003771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ehcache - Easy Hibernate Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252062 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252103] Review Request: odmg - ODMG 3.0 Java Binding In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoXWW004033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odmg - ODMG 3.0 Java Binding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252103 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoQ03003869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252101 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227118] Review Request: tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-1jpp - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoWBi004015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-1jpp - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227118 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoTFK003936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227116 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252047] Review Request: jakarta-commons-transaction - Commons Transaction In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoTji003962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-transaction - Commons Transaction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252047 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoZCZ004073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227076 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252089] Review Request: oscache - High performance J2EE caching solution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Loaxo004097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oscache - High performance J2EE caching solution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252089 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoOsj003817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252100 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252101] Review Request: joesnmp - Java SNMP class library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoQU4003844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joesnmp - Java SNMP class library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252100] Review Request: jakarta-slide-webdavclient - Slide WebDAV client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoNnH003797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-slide-webdavclient - Slide WebDAV client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252100 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227110] Review Request: proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp - ProxyToys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LofNc004234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxytoys-0.2.1-1jpp - ProxyToys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227110 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227067] Review Request: javassist-3.1-1jpp - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoVd7003984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javassist-3.1-1jpp - Java Programming Assistant: bytecode manipulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227067 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227043] Review Request: cglib-2.1.3-2jpp - Code Generation Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Loedp004197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cglib-2.1.3-2jpp - Code Generation Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227043 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227039] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent-2.1-1jpp - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoRpj003891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent-2.1-1jpp - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227039 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lof8m004214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227043 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoSlE003903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227039 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252052] Review Request: bsh2 - Lightweight Scripting for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoLcb003746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsh2 - Lightweight Scripting for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252052 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoaUl004119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252089 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227076] Review Request: juddi-0.9-0.rc4.2jpp - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoYNg004056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: juddi-0.9-0.rc4.2jpp - Open source Java implementation UDDI specification. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227076 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252090] Review Request: proxool - Proxool Java connection pool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lodvb004174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: proxool - Proxool Java connection pool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252090 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227056] Review Request: geronimo-specs-1.1-1jpp - Geronimo J2EE server J2EE specifications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LocFG004156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geronimo-specs-1.1-1jpp - Geronimo J2EE server J2EE specifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227056 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227116] Review Request: servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoSvV003924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: servletapi4-4.0.4-4jpp - Java servlet and JSP implementation classes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227116 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LohY5004291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227124 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227124] Review Request: xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp - Java XML-RPC implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Logp1004274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-2.0.1-3jpp - Java XML-RPC implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227124 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LoiU0004316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252105] Review Request: quartz - Quartz Enterprise Job Scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LojLK004346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quartz - Quartz Enterprise Job Scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252105 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LogmO004251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227110 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227052] Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Loqv6004496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma-2.0-0.5312.1jpp - Code Coverage Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227052 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227128] Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lobdm004139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xstream-1.1.3-1jpp - XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227128 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227120] Review Request: ws-scout-1.0-4jpp - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LokSx004367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ws-scout-1.0-4jpp - Apache Scout Implementation of JSR 93 (JAXR) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227120 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LooOn004442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252077 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lol2I004392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lopmu004476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227053 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Louhj004584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|227072 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252082] Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Louw8004614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jarjar - Jar Jar Links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252082 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252077] Review Request: ivy - Dependency manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LonVB004420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivy - Dependency manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252077 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227072] Review Request: jmock-1.0.1-3jpp - Test Java code using mock objects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LotNW004568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jmock-1.0.1-3jpp - Test Java code using mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227072 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227053] Review Request: excalibur-avalon-framework-4.3-6jpp - Avalon Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Loorx004463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: excalibur-avalon-framework-4.3-6jpp - Avalon Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227053 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252084] Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lowxh004665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jgraph - JGraph Diagram Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252084 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251428] Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LorEj004521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aopalliance - Java/J2EE AOP standards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251428 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252097] Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33LosuG004547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252097 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|197974 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032150.m33Lov3L004640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|252082 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 21:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032154.m33Lsj4a005903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-03 17:54 EST ------- Imported and built for Rawhide. Builds for F-8 and EL-{4,5} are coming along soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 22:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032240.m33Me6Cl029824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-03 18:40 EST ------- Please update the release number as well and give the links for updated files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 22:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032250.m33MojfV016650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 ------- Additional Comments From wwoods at redhat.com 2008-04-03 18:50 EST ------- Added. Builds in mock for me now. Spec URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/preupgrade.spec SRPM URL: http://wwoods.fedorapeople.org/review/preupgrade-0.9-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032305.m33N55af019255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 19:05 EST ------- Rahul, if you're reviewing this, please set the fedora-cvs flag to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032306.m33N6aX8001989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 19:06 EST ------- *** Bug 226576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226576] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032306.m33N6ZCG001968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-amd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226576 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 19:06 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 440353 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252059] Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032311.m33NBQ1w020245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: derby - Derby DB (ex Cloudscape) Alias: derby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252059 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-03 19:11 EST ------- Just from a quick once-over: * website indicates latest derby is 10.3.2.1 * rpmlint complains derby.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 209) derby.src: W: non-standard-group Database derby.src: W: invalid-license Apache License Version 2.0 derby.src: W: strange-permission derby-10.0.2.1-test.script 0755 * Scratch build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547332) FAILS, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=547334&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032334.m33NY4WR006304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 19:34 EST ------- This seems to have progressed a bit since I looked at bug 226576. There seems to have been a real release, so there's no longer a need to add comments about how to make the git checkout. The license tag is still "MIT/X11", which is invalid. Should be just "MIT". That's the only remaining complaint from my original review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:39:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032339.m33NdxYd008019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:36:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032336.m33NawIn007094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 19:36 EST ------- *** Bug 440473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440473] Review Request: xosview - An X Window System utility for monitoring system resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032336.m33NavDq007068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - An X Window System utility for monitoring system resources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440473 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 19:36 EST ------- xosview seems to have already been submitted for review. Perhaps you could work with the submitter of bug 434906. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 434906 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440556] New: Pup dialog appears on screen even when running programs in full screen mode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440556 Summary: Pup dialog appears on screen even when running programs in full screen mode Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hedleyproctor at yahoo.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: I have noticed a minor problem with the package updater (pup) and running programs in full screen mode. e.g. If I play the game Glest, it runs in full screen mode, but occasionally whilst playing the package updater pops on to the screen with a message about new updates. The problem is that once the dialog has appeared it is impossible to get rid of it, because if a program is operating in full screen mode then obviously all the mouse and keyboard input is captured by the program, not fed to the desktop. I guess this could be fixed by pup checking if a full screen mode program was running before displaying its dialog box. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 8 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run a program in full screen mode. 2. Wait for new packages to become available via pup. 3. Observe that the pup dialog box appears on the screen and can't be got rid of. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 3 23:53:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439157] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804032353.m33Nr0C4014611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439157 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-03 19:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=300368) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=300368&action=view) don't default to JSON I'll file this as a separate bug when branched/built, but F-8 and older only have JSON 1.15, not 2.04 as this package requires. Catalyst::View::JSON seems to force JSON::Any to use JSON vs JSON::XS, and JSON::Any doesn't know how to deal with JSON < 2.x. This patch lets this package use whatever JSON module JSON::Any feels is appropriate, unless one is explicitly specified; you may find it helpful when branching/building :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 00:00:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040000.m34006lb005473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-03 20:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: latex2emf Short Description: Create EMF files from LaTeX source Owners: alexlan Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 01:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] New: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/compat/openssl098b.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/compat/openssl098b-0.9.8b-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. OpenSSL includes a certificate management tool and shared libraries which provide various cryptographic algorithms and protocols. This is a compatibility package, so that programs compiled against F8's openssl can be used on F9. Note that some of the tests have been disabled, because the X509 test failed on F9 (rebuilding F8's openssl also fails at the same point) Spec diff: --- openssl.spec 2007-10-15 11:20:47.000000000 -0400 +++ openssl098b.spec 2008-04-03 20:54:05.000000000 -0400 @@ -19,9 +19,9 @@ %define optimize_arches i686 Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit -Name: openssl +Name: openssl098b Version: 0.9.8b -Release: 17%{?dist} +Release: 1%{?dist} Source: openssl-%{version}-usa.tar.bz2 Source1: hobble-openssl Source2: Makefile.certificate @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ from other formats to the formats used by the OpenSSL toolkit. %prep -%setup -q +%setup -q -n openssl-%{version} %{SOURCE1} > /dev/null %patch0 -p1 -b .redhat @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ # Verify that what was compiled actually works. LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}} export LD_LIBRARY_PATH -make -C test apps tests +make -C test apps # tests: commenting out, does not build on F9 %{__cc} -o openssl-thread-test \ `krb5-config --cflags` \ -I./include \ @@ -332,6 +332,23 @@ # Remove fips fingerprint script rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/openssl_fips_fingerprint +# Remove files not used by compatibility packages. +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_sysconfdir} +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/ssl +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir} +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.a +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.so +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.so.* +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/openssl +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir} + +# Fix CHANGES file: contains ISO-8859 characters +sed -i 's|\xe4|ae|g' CHANGES +sed -i 's|\xf6|oe|g' CHANGES + + %clean [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -341,51 +358,17 @@ %doc doc/README doc/c-indentation.el doc/openssl.txt %doc doc/openssl_button.html doc/openssl_button.gif %doc doc/ssleay.txt -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/certs -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/certs/make-dummy-cert -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/certs/Makefile -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/cert.pem -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/misc -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/misc/CA -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/CA -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/CA/private -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/misc/c_* -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/private - -%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/openssl.cnf -%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt - -%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/openssl %attr(0755,root,root) /%{_lib}/*.so.%{version} %attr(0755,root,root) /%{_lib}/*.so.%{soversion} -%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/openssl -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1*/[ABD-Zabcd-z]* -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man5*/* -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man7*/* - -%ifnarch %{optimize_arches} -%files devel -%defattr(-,root,root) -%{_prefix}/include/openssl -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_libdir}/*.a -%attr(0755,root,root) %{_libdir}/*.so -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man3*/* -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc - -%files perl -%defattr(-,root,root) -%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/c_rehash -%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1*/*.pl* -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/misc -%{_sysconfdir}/pki/tls/misc/*.pl -%endif %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig %changelog +* Thu Apr 3 2008 Michel Salim 0.9.8b-1 +- change to a compatibility package by renaming and cutting the files lists + * Mon Oct 15 2007 Joe Orton 0.9.8b-17 - update to new CA bundle from mozilla.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 01:13:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040113.m341DMWg021929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmraz at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-03 21:13 EST ------- Thomas, any idea what's causing the X509 test in openssl 0.9.8b to fail on F9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 01:31:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040131.m341VaGS010593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-04-03 21:31 EST ------- Given that this is the only problem, would you mind approving so I can import and build it without going through the pointless effort of redoing the URL's here? =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 01:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040137.m341btxS026132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 21:37 EST ------- No problem. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 02:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040246.m342kr6r003370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 22:46 EST ------- for F8 build to generate egginfo you can change your spec to add build and install sections as %build %if 0%{?fedora} > 8 CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{__python} setup.py build %else CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{__python} -c 'import setuptools; execfile("setup.py")' build %endif %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %if 0%{?fedora} > 8 %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} %else %{__python} -c 'import setuptools; execfile("setup.py")' install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 02:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040258.m342wP2x020589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |walters at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-03 22:58 EST ------- Taking this, I have an update coming too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040303.m3433V3Y009282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 23:03 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to complain about. According to the source (or commander.c, at least), the license is GPLv2+. Do you see anything that might restrict it to GPLv2 only? Everything else looks good to me. * source files match upstream: 415e3e257472c3f784eba43d0c298d2432491b20870f0cbe6beb6756692235f8 firecontrol-0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: firecontrol = 0.2-1.fc9 = libraw1394.so.8()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no way to test this software. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440556] Pup dialog appears on screen even when running programs in full screen mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040309.m3439lXs025005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Pup dialog appears on screen even when running programs in full screen mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440556 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | Component|Package Review |pirut ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 23:09 EST ------- This does not seem to be a package review submission; changing component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040330.m343Uqwx001071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-03 23:30 EST ------- Here is the new rpm with all the changes: SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-lzo.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/python-lzo-1.08-2.fc8.src.rpm dist-f8 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547587 dist-f9 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:31:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440010] Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040331.m343VbjW001390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440010 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 23:31 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The license is a bit confusing. The upstream web site says GPLv2, as does setup.py, but the COPYING file is v3 and the dgevilspie file says v3+. I guess saying v3+ is as good a choice as any, but this should be clarified with the upstream developer. One thing I saw when testing was that a dialog with the following text was displayed at each program start: Make sure that Python-Wnck is correctly installed for 'filler' module to run properly. Perhaps an additional dependency is in order? I don't think this is a blocker but it would probably be good to fix it if possible. * source files match upstream: 1e677b41a6f3f256f759a48f92c613e68dafc3c5a2586230c61591481faf76b2 gdevilspie-0.31.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license (I think). * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: gdevilspie = 0.31-1.fc9 = /usr/bin/python devilspie python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I tested that the software would run but I could not test functionality as I do not run metacity/devilspie. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040338.m343cCbt021345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-04-03 23:38 EST ------- Oops, I'd only looked at the COPYING file and saw it was GPLv2, neglected to look at the source header to see 2+ there. I'll fix that. Okay, done: http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/firecontrol/firecontrol-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/jwilson/packages/firecontrol/firecontrol.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040338.m343cJsQ021404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:38 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => dist-f8 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547587 dist-f9 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547582 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 292a3b6cdaca606b917e7f6bf026fdad python-lzo-1.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package python-lzo-1.08-2.fc9=> Provides: lzo.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) liblzo2.so.2 libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040340.m343e0Ql003974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:40 EST ------- I better move away from this review. Till, feel free to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:41:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040341.m343fAko022915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:41 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438932] Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040341.m343fZvM022984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438932 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:41 EST ------- ping for updated SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040340.m343eSE3022764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:40 EST ------- I better move away from this review. Patrice, feel free to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:42:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040342.m343grgS005238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-04-03 23:42 EST ------- Oh, and to test it, simply start it up with elevated privs on a box with a firewire controller. It should report number of controllers found, current bus generation, etc. You can try issuing the command 'br short' to see if it properly issues a bus reset to the controller or 'r . 0 0xfffff0000400 4' to read the first quadlet of the card's config rom, which is some header CRC and length info, or offset 404, which is the 1394 header. For example: ... Command: r . 0 0xfffff0000400 4 reading from node 0, bus 1023, offset 0XFFFFF0000400 4 bytes read succeeded. Data follows (hex): 04 04 22 8E Ack code: complete Command: r . 0 0xfffff0000404 4 reading from node 0, bus 1023, offset 0XFFFFF0000404 4 bytes read succeeded. Data follows (hex): 31 33 39 34 Ack code: complete It gets far more interesting with devices connected, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040344.m343igU8024089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040348.m343mRMX025112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:48 EST ------- New guidelines are up. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040348.m343mYJI025157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-03 23:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-lzo Short Description: Python bindings for lzo compression libraries Owners: huzaifas Branches: F-8, F-9, EPEL-5 InitialCC: huzaifas Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040348.m343mswH025527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:48 EST ------- package failed to build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040348.m343mtAS025556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-03 23:48 EST ------- Cool. I went ahead and built it for i386 and ran it on a rawhide box with a firewire port. It did indeed seem to work fine with the above examples. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040349.m343n9sI025672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-03 23:49 EST ------- Spec URL: http://cdn.verbum.org/jna.spec SRPM URL: http://cdn.verbum.org/jna-3.0.2-6.fc9.src.rpm Ok, lots of changes from the previous spec. * Build debuginfo package * Redo structure of library locations to match guidelines; this means that an architecture-independent jar is in /usr/share/java, and the .so is in %{_libdir}/jna/ * Restructure patch for dynlinking/CFLAGS again to hopefully be more palatable to upstream (patch is updated in the issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:58:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040358.m343wHdq028718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:58 EST ------- which new guildeline change allows .cmo file here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040357.m343va4W028552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-03 23:57 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547594 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. ocaml-openin.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-openin.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ==> Ok to accept as per fixed in bug 433783. + source files match upstream. ac44983ed6c1d2ac81c6d6cbfe330975 openin-20070524.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + Package ocaml-openin-20070524-1.fc9 => Provides: ocaml(Pa_openin) = ceafc30d0bb5e45366c8789e54bcff98 Requires: ocaml(Arg) = 03e86a4154064ea900dc32c05f53e364 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(CamlinternalOO) = 6d0d5b328d6db88f403ca4393b4abd38 ocaml(Camlp4) = 1e46a133b8062d1571640f7fa36f32c4 ocaml(Camlp4_config) = cb716b4361f43326c6ad695c7a1bb5c0 ocaml(Camlp4_import) = 0134ca95282ef6821081c0c11802cea0 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Oo) = d1fd8eab2c1fb52f42b20d2c4fa47731 ocaml(Parsing) = 62cca107e4e88af303516459a87c3e9a ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Queue) = caa3a209bfc63d23a30f573541a88fec ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040400.m3440EkV011530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 00:00 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439142] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040401.m3441ARW030434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439142 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 00:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439163] Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040401.m3441WSp030607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439163 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 00:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040358.m343wnPN029053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-03 23:58 EST ------- Hello, Colin: You seem to have changed the assignee to yourself, however you cannot approve your own package. What does it mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 03:59:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040359.m343xAld029383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040401.m3441jo2012453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 00:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439152] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040401.m3441Jw4012364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439152 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 00:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040409.m3449cEJ001386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 00:09 EST ------- Hi Mamoru-san, this is now a combination of work from Conrad and me; do you think you could review it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040412.m344CFtU002426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |stringtemplate - A Java |stringtemplate - A Java |template engine |template engine ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 00:12 EST ------- This failed to build for me: + ant jar Buildfile: build.xml init: prepare-sources: [mkdir] Created dir: /builddir/build/BUILD/stringtemplate-3.1/build [mkdir] Created dir: /builddir/build/BUILD/stringtemplate-3.1/build/src [copy] Copying 71 files to /builddir/build/BUILD/stringtemplate-3.1/build/src generator: BUILD FAILED /builddir/build/BUILD/stringtemplate-3.1/build.xml:98: Problem: failed to create task or type antlr Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.ANTLR was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/usr/share/ant/lib -/builddir/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem Total time: 0 seconds error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71988 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:10:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040410.m344Avxl016588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 00:10 EST ------- any reason (SQL::Translator 0.09000)tests are skipping for -devel build then. I see t/03podcoverage............................skipped all skipped: set TEST_POD to enable this test t/86sqlt...................................skipped all skipped: SQL::Translator required t/94versioning.............................skipped all skipped: needs DBD::SQLite and SQL::Translator 0.09 for testing t/bindtype_columns.........................skipped all skipped: Set $ENV{DBICTEST_PG_DSN}, _USER and _PASS to run this test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427010] Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040420.m344KGTe019722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427010 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040419.m344JWAx019182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:19:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222009] Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040419.m344J7Om019056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fswebcam - Small webcam app https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222009 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436479] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040420.m344KoI9005876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 - Perl interface to the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436479 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040419.m344JLow005140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:22:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436551] Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040422.m344M2o4006257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-LWP-UserAgent-Determined - A virtual browser that retries errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436551 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040418.m344IjM1004663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436481] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040421.m344LYeN006135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 - Use the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436481 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040428.m344SYtJ008326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 00:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Hi Mamoru-san, this is now a combination of work from Conrad and me; do you > think you could review it? Yes :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040431.m344V0fa024164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 00:30 EST ------- Conrad, now - Java packaging guidelines seems established - Current tzdata is 2008b So would you update this package again so that I can check this package later? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040437.m344buD2026464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-04 00:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Conrad, now > - Java packaging guidelines seems established > - Current tzdata is 2008b > > So would you update this package again so that I can check > this package later? Yep. Thanks for your patience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040444.m344iP6e028538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 00:44 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I don't understand where you see the clarified Artistic license in the upstream source. The copyright information says: This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself. which would be "GPL+ or Artistic". Do you have some other source of licensing information for this software? * source files match upstream: 20b08432ac1aebaa2cf290e92344ae19073da6d87be464952a2a73f9718890f9 Algorithm-FastPermute-0.999.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not seem to match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: FastPermute.so()(64bit) perl(Algorithm::FastPermute) = 0.999 perl-Algorithm-FastPermute = 0.999-1.fc9 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040446.m344kp8X014540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 00:46 EST ------- rubberband-1.0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040448.m344mLqK014786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 04:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040447.m344lQwo030128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 00:47 EST ------- rubberband-1.0.1-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:04:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040504.m3454LES021161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-04 01:04 EST ------- Test (re)enable on all distro. I need to work on this (only EL4) issue. Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Entities.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-Entities-0.02-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:29:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040529.m345TLJK013827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-04 01:29 EST ------- updated release number links for updated files http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-2.fc9.src.rpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:36:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436930] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040536.m345aYcb000432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436930 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-04 01:36 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040538.m345cCVY000932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040538.m345cANI000909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|fc6 |6 fedora-triage-list at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-triage- | |list at redhat.com Status Whiteboard| | bzcl34nup ------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list at redhat.com 2008-04-04 01:38 EST ------- Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:35:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040535.m345ZsrG016731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-04 01:35 EST ------- Hi Dr. Kriehn, I did not known you want to push packages from http://optics.csufresno.edu/fedora/ to Fedora, however that's great. I did a some work on the xosview package in your repo and submitted for review ( bug 440473). The spec file is here: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview.spec Please have a look, there are some improvements there (imho). I also did some initial work on e17 packages. Do you want to maintain those in Fedora too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 05:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439588] Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040539.m345dVxK001760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-aws - Ruby interface to Amazon Web Services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439588 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 01:39 EST ------- Rebuilt on all branches, requested on bodhi to push, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS branching! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 06:58:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040658.m346wQok027779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 02:58 EST ------- Well, - Now libjnidispatch.so is out of jar file, the explicit "Requires: libffi" should be removed. - "BuildRequires: pkgconfig" should be removed. If this is needed, libffi-devel should have "Requires: pkgconfig" and actually libffi-devel correctly requires pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 07:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040706.m34767JW029907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 03:06 EST ------- Also: - Please check the minimum Requires of java per described in the section "BuildRequires and Requires" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java (Epoch missing) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 07:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040706.m3476ShE012509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|walters at redhat.com |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 07:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040711.m347BDYn031603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 03:11 EST ------- Well now Java packaging guidelines are imported, so - Would you check the "Requires" of java (especially Epoch dependency) per the section "BuildRequires and Requires" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 07:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040717.m347HenK016597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(assim.deodia at gmail | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 03:17 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 07:57:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040757.m347vgXm029363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-04 03:57 EST ------- Ok, I'll do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 08:04:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040804.m3484lba031504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jess at zend.com ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-04-04 04:04 EST ------- *** Bug 439015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 08:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439015] Review Request: libzend-framework-php - A simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040804.m3484kLG031472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzend-framework-php - A simple, straightforward, open-source software framework for PHP 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439015 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-04-04 04:04 EST ------- Closing this bug as a duplicate of bug 421241. You are of course all welcome to help improving the spec as there are still issues how to handle the unit tests properly. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 421241 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 08:07:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040807.m3487gQI032458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-04 04:07 EST ------- Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 07:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 03:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040758.m347wpgK014460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language Alias: tzdata-java-epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-04 03:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Since the License: tag refers only to the > final binary package, that should be correct. Does it? The source rpm packages also contain this license tag, and the indeed don't contain only public domain code. Is that rule documented somewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040903.m3493v9j030797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-04 05:03 EST ------- ok, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:06:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040906.m3496Ena031527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-04 05:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > callum: have you made further progress ? > would you like some patches to address the above issues ? David, maybe you are interested in picking this up? Callum seems to be spending most if its time working on secondlife itself (mostly upstream). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040908.m3498j1M014269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-04 05:08 EST ------- Fernando, any chance you could get around to importing this? I'll do the CVS creation request for you to speed things up: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sooperlooper Short Description: Realtime software looping sampler Owners: nando, jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040916.m349Gqno001328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-04-04 05:16 EST ------- I'm not sure - can you attach the log here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040922.m349Miq0017106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-04-04 05:22 EST ------- "This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as Perl itself." => therefore I've followed http://dev.perl.org/licenses/, where is a note from Larry Wall: "For those of you that choose to use the GNU General Public License, my interpretation of the GNU General Public License is that no Perl script falls under the terms of the GPL unless you explicitly put said script under the terms of the GPL yourself." Anyway I've corrected it to "GPL+ or Artistic" as you and our Perl Packaging Guidelines suggest:) New SPEC: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute.spec New SRPM: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute/perl-Algorithm-FastPermute-0.999-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:26:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040926.m349QVnx018215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-04-04 05:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I better move away from this review. Till, feel free to review this package. I do not currently have the time to review this, also I doubt that it is ok with the spirit of the review process that I review this, because I wrote the initial spec of this packages. Btw. you need to clear the fedora-review flag, when you step down as a reviewer, I did this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] New: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://music.nuim.ie/vlazzarini/tmp/olpcsound.spec SRPM URL: http://music.nuim.ie/vlazzarini/tmp/olpcsound-5.08.91-0.src.rpm Description: This a subset of Csound 5 tailored specifically for the OLPC project and the XO platform. The main purpose of this package is to substitute the full Csound 5 package currently being used by OLPC with this subset (which is in sync with the full Csound 5 releases). This subset has been created by the Csound 5 team and will be maintained by them. I was chosen to become the package maintainer and I will need to be sponsored, as this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804040944.m349iZTx022116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435954] Review Request: cuetools - Utilities to work with cue and TOC files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041006.m34A6NMp012360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cuetools - Utilities to work with cue and TOC files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435954 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2008-04-04 06:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cuetools Short Description: Utilities to work with cue and TOC files Owners: stingray Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:10:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439142] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041010.m34AANOJ027608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439142 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-04 06:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP Short Description: LDAP model class for Catalyst Owners: sxw Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439157] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041013.m34AD4GW013707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439157 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-04 06:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON Short Description: JSON view for your Catalyst data Owners: sxw Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439152] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041011.m34ABe4e013579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439152 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-04 06:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace Short Description: Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen Owners: sxw Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:15:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041015.m34AFIQi028526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-04 06:15 EST ------- Hi panemade, Are you prepared to approve based on the new package in comment #5? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041014.m34AEURE028135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Alias: gnuradio-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-04 06:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnuradio New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041021.m34ALhAj015450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 06:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-type-conv Short Description: OCaml base library for type conversion Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:25:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041025.m34APa7L030443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 06:25 EST ------- aha I missed comment #5. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:28:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041028.m34ASXov030779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 06:28 EST ------- Since no one can be bothered to update this BZ, despite the desperate importance of mldonkey to the future of Fedora, I'm closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041034.m34AYb5g031777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 06:34 EST ------- It's the exception: "if the cmo file is a camlp4 preprocessor (like Camlp4OCamlPrinter.cmo in OCaml), then it must be included because otherwise the syntax extension would not be available." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml#head-acc221f1e087bc5ce860356b34823bb447da5df5 *.cmo files are loadable object files. Camlp4 (the macro preprocessor) loads the pa_openin.cmo file at runtime, which modifies the actual syntax accepted by the compiler. In this case it adds the useful 'open M in e' syntax so you can open a module just for the bit of code that actually needs it, not for the whole program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041038.m34AcTUZ018217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041043.m34AhCsQ019204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 06:43 EST ------- Thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041051.m34ApNmn002764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-04 06:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Task-Weaken Short Description: Ensure that a platform has weaken support Owners: sxw Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440010] Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041053.m34Arssw003040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440010 sindrepb at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sindrepb at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 06:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gdevilspie Short Description: A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon Owners: sindrepb Branches: F-8,F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222960] Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041055.m34Atxhg021571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: XenMan - Graphical management tool for Xen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222960 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Platform|noarch |All Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | Version|6 |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 06:55 EST ------- We must not close review requests automatically :( By the way, will you still want to have this package reviewed, Xavier? (I have no knowledge about Xen...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:06:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041106.m34B6EpD024813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 07:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-openin Short Description: OCaml syntax to locally open modules Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:19:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041119.m34BJq9Y027765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 07:19 EST ------- You need to do a CVS request and continue the new package process. Read: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess You are currently on step 7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041123.m34BNhRt028678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 07:23 EST ------- The summary should be: "Library for creating easy mail filters" or similar. The current summary isn't clear. Starting the package review anyway ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041133.m34BXWv8012014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2008-04-04 07:33 EST ------- Hrm, I tried to post something earlier but bugzilla was b0rked at the time. I've been in contact with some Debian people (who are working on packaging Second Life for Debian) who have decided to take over upstream xmlrpc-epi maintenance since the previous upstream is quite dead. They've been able to get access to the Sourceforge project and it looks like they released a 0.52 tarball which should have all the current needed patches merged. They also pointed out PHP is carrying a private copy of xmlrpc-epi, they're working on merging in the PHP changes (Which seems to consist of the same fixes everyone else needs anyway) so PHP can be built against an external copy. Fedora policy dictates we do likewise when this package is accepted, so I guess we need to get the PHP maintainers in on this review... I suggest reading through their ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413986 I suppose if someone really wants to take this package over, I wouldn't mind. I already have my work cut out for me with the Second Life client itself... :) Also of note, there was a rather vague message from a Linden Lab developer saying xmlrpc is being phased out: https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/2008-March/008733.html Which would seem to imply the use of xmlrpc-epi in the SL client may be discontinued at some point in the hand-wavey future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041132.m34BWqjQ011945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 07:32 EST ------- - rpmlint output perl-Mail-Audit.noarch: W: manifest-in-perl-module /usr/share/doc/perl-Mail-Audit-2.222/MANIFEST This perl module package contains a MANIFEST or a MANIFEST.SKIP file in the documentation directory. perl-Mail-Audit.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Mail::Audit) This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it once. Please fix both of these. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture (i386) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files - %defattr line The %defattr line seems to be wrong. I think it should be: %defattr(-,root,root,-) + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available (not done) reviewer should build the package in mock (not done) the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures (ran tests) review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin --- OK, a few things to be fixed there, but nothing major wrong with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041147.m34Blesj000873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 assim.deodia at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 11:56:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041156.m34Bu33A016693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 assim.deodia at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(assim.deodia at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-04-04 07:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Dotconf Short Description: Dotconf is a library used to handle configuration files. Owners: assim Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 12:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041226.m34CQZfd010227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-04-04 08:26 EST ------- Ok, I've made the requested changes. Spec URL: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Header.spec SRPM URL: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Header-1.2.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 12:25:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438810] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041225.m34CPYfB023952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438810 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-04-04 08:25 EST ------- Ok, I've made the requested fixes so the directories are owned and such. Spec URL: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Download.spec SRPM URL: http://web.davehollis.com:81/packages/php-pear-HTTP-Download-1.1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220402] Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041317.m34DHJB9008178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jscall-sharp-0.0.2 - a JS binding for gecko-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220402 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] New: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-logging.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-logging-1.1.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: LuaLogging provides a simple API to use logging features in Lua. Its design was based on log4j. LuaLogging currently supports, through the use of appenders, console, file, email, socket and sql outputs. Website: http://www.keplerproject.org/lualogging/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:55:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] New: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/luadoc.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/luadoc-3.0.1.tar.gz Description: LuaDoc is a documentation generator tool for Lua source code. It parses the declarations and documentation comments in a set of Lua source files and produces a set of XHTML pages describing the commented declarations and functions. The output is not limited to XHTML. Other formats can be generated by implementing new doclets. The format of the documentation comments is also flexible and can be customized by implementing new taglets. Website: http://luadoc.luaforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] New: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-filesystem.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-filesystem-1.4.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: LuaFileSystem is a Lua library developed to complement the set of functions related to file systems offered by the standard Lua distribution. LuaFileSystem offers a portable way to access the underlying directory structure and file attributes. Website: http://www.keplerproject.org/luafilesystem/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] New: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-posix.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-posix-5.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a POSIX library for Lua which provides access to many POSIX features to Lua programs. Website: http://luaforge.net/projects/luaposix/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] New: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-sql.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-sql-2.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: LuaSQL is a simple interface from Lua to a DBMS. This package of LuaSQL supports MySQL, SQLite and PostgreSQL databases. You can execute arbitrary SQL statements and it allows for retrieving results in a row-by-row cursor fashion. Website: http://www.keplerproject.org/luasql/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 13:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] New: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tim at niemueller.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-socket.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-socket-2.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: LuaSocket is a Lua extension library that is composed by two parts: a C core that provides support for the TCP and UDP transport layers, and a set of Lua modules that add support for functionality commonly needed by applications that deal with the Internet. Among the support modules, the most commonly used implement the SMTP, HTTP and FTP. In addition there are modules for MIME, URL handling and LTN12. Website: http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~diego/professional/luasocket/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:12:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041412.m34ECOGa018133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |440678, 440679 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:12:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041412.m34ECOTs018153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |440680 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041412.m34ECPeH018173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |440680 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:13:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041413.m34ED6HU001795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |440676, 440680 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:13:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041413.m34ED6D0001815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |440681 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041413.m34ED705001835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |440681 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226464] Merge Review: system-config-network In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041418.m34EILVj021018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226464 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-04 10:18 EST ------- No need to open this review now as cvs is done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041438.m34EcqBn011020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 10:38 EST ------- Still not good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=547875 - For desktop-file-utils usage, please refer to the section "desktop-file-install usage" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - Category 'X-Fedora' is now deprecated and should be removed. - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. - Calling update-desktop-database is not needed because the installed desktop file does not contain any MimeType key (ref. the section "desktop-database" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - About compilation option: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/moc_command_list.o [ 42%] /usr/bin/c++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O3 -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/include/QtGui -I/usr/include/QtXml -I/usr/include/QtCore -I/usr/include/Qt -DUSER_CONFIG -DQT_SHARED -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -o src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/moc_command_list.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/qtoctave-0.7.3/src/moc_command_list.cxx Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/qtoctave.dir/moc_codeedit.o ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here Fedora specific compilation flags uses optimization level -O2, which is overrided by later -O3 option and Fedora does not allow this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 14:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225806] Merge Review: glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041450.m34Eon8C013860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glibc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225806 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-04 10:50 EST ------- OK, just revisiting this. Only one change didn't make it in: --- glibc.spec.BAD 2008-04-04 10:43:37.000000000 -0400 +++ glibc.spec 2008-04-04 10:48:06.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ %define glibcdate 20080328T1347 -%define glibcname glibc -%define glibcsrcdir glibc-20080328T1347 +%define glibcsrcdir glibc-%{glibcdate} %define glibc_release_tarballs 0 %define run_glibc_tests 1 %define auxarches i586 i686 athlon sparcv9v sparc64v alphaev6 @@ -38,8 +37,8 @@ Source1: %(echo %{glibcsrcdir} | sed s/g Source2: %(echo %{glibcsrcdir} | sed s/glibc-/glibc-libidn-/).tar.bz2 %define glibc_release_unpack -a1 -a2 %endif -Source3: %{glibcname}-fedora-%{glibcdate}.tar.bz2 -Patch0: %{glibcname}-fedora.patch +Source3: %{name}-fedora-%{glibcdate}.tar.bz2 +Patch0: %{name}-fedora.patch Patch1: %{name}-ia64-lib64.patch Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Obsoletes: glibc-profile < 2.4 Basically, there is no longer a need for a "%{glibcname}" macro, since %{name} serves that purpose. Also, we should use %{glibcdate} when defining %{glibcsrcdir}. Aside from this change, everything else (while somewhat complex), looks ok. Once I see that change go into rawhide CVS, I'll sign off on this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:01:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041501.m34F1qK9016656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-04-04 11:01 EST ------- I am getting this error: [Assim at localhost .ssh]$ cvs co Dotconf cvs server: cannot find module `Dotconf' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules Tried with 'd' in small caps also. [Assim at localhost .ssh]$ cvs co dotconf cvs server: cannot find module `dotconf' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules my keys are same as on the server. Is it that repository is not created on the server?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041500.m34F0k3N016392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-04 11:00 EST ------- I versioned the servlet and jsp Provides with their respective spec versions. Originally, I had servlet-%{servletspec}-api Obsoletes/Provides servletapi6. However, servletapi6 contains *both* servletapi and jspapi and it also turns out that these packages don't even conflict sicne they have a `6' in their name. The servletapi6 package has these provides: Provides: servlet Provides: servlet6 Provides: servlet25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] New: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/AcetoneISO2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/AcetoneISO2-2.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: AcetoneISO2: The CD/DVD image manipulator for Linux, it can do the following: - Mount and Unmount ISO, MDF, NRG (if iso-9660 standard) - Convert / Extract / Browse to ISO : *.bin *.mdf *.nrg *.img *.daa *.cdi *.xbx *.b5i *.bwi *.pdi - Play a DVD Movie ISO with most used media players - Generate an ISO from a Folder or CD/DVD - Generate/Check MD5 file of an image - Encrypt/decrypt an image - Split image into X megabyte chunks - Highly compress an image - Rip a PSX cd to *.bin to make it work with epsxe/psx emulators - Service-Menu support for Konqueror - Restore a lost CUE file of *.bin *.img I've been sitting on this for a while now, waiting for the GPLv3 / QT4 incompatibility to go away, but we're good on this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041516.m34FGFMA004555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 11:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Is it that repository is not created on the server?? Not yet. Please wait until someone changes fedora-cvs flag to plus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:19:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041519.m34FJgvv020709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041526.m34FQ72S007049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:26 EST ------- Marek: Can you please re-check this package against the now approved Java guidelines and re-approve it if all is well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041528.m34FSYdQ023356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Alias: gnuradio-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:30:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041530.m34FUtg9008326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:30 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:31:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041531.m34FVoZc024494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:31 EST ------- CVS is processed manually by CVS admins. ;) Before I process your request: - Shouldn't the package name be 'dotconf' and not 'Dotconf' ? - Shouldn't the description be: "A library used to handle configuration files" Since it's already the description for dotconf, adding the package name there is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041539.m34FdLqG025944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041544.m34Fif6m027188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-04 11:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Entities Short Description: Decode strings with XML entities Owners: remi Branches: F-7, F-8, EL-5, EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:42:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435954] Review Request: cuetools - Utilities to work with cue and TOC files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041542.m34Fgegs026898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cuetools - Utilities to work with cue and TOC files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435954 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041543.m34Fhv5n011715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-04 11:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Entities Short Description: Decode strings with XML entities Owners: Branches: F-7, F-8, EL5, EL4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:45:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439142] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041545.m34FjpEf027943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439142 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:49:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041549.m34FnNeu028594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-04 11:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compat-guichan06 Short Description: compatibility libraries for older guichan release Owners: wart Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439152] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041552.m34Fq8C2029798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439152 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439157] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041554.m34FskOJ014963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439157 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 15:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041558.m34Fw6YX031631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 11:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041601.m34G1CfW000591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 12:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:07:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041607.m34G7rvg019847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 12:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041603.m34G3mdP018239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 12:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440010] Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041605.m34G5peQ002419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440010 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 12:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041612.m34GCJgC004108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 12:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041618.m34GIUHA022581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-04-04 12:18 EST ------- tibbs, thanks much for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: firecontrol Short Description: A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus Owners: jwilson Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041629.m34GTgfh025087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 ------- Additional Comments From rmccabe at redhat.com 2008-04-04 12:29 EST ------- It's still blocked by bug #433679 (clustermon review), as ricci depends on clustermon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041631.m34GVDiq025847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 cfeist at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cfeist at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:31:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041631.m34GV90x025792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 12:31 EST ------- Devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=548648 F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=548646 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:31:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434707] Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041631.m34GVAwm025813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 Bug 434707 depends on bug 434706, which changed state. Bug 434706 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041633.m34GXmPt026409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-04-04 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dotconf Short Description: A library used to handle configuration files. Owners: assim Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:36:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435293] Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041636.m34GaPCx009823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-04 12:36 EST ------- Devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=548647 F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=548650 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:38:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041638.m34GcfkI027929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 12:38 EST ------- Thanks for catching that! Updated spec: http://cdn.verbum.org/jna.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:46:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041646.m34Gkt23012989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 12:46 EST ------- Sorry, however would you also provide srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 16:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436611] Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041651.m34GplCN032043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Entities - Decode strings with XML entities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436611 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 17:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041702.m34H2IqM002510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 13:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 17:02:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041702.m34H2Daa002470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 13:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 17:04:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041704.m34H4mN7003291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 13:04 EST ------- Yep, here it is: SRPM: http://cdn.verbum.org/jna-3.0.2-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 17:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041715.m34HFDve020076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 13:15 EST ------- Thanks, I cleaned up the build deps: http://cdn.verbum.org/stringtemplate.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/stringtemplate-3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 17:47:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041747.m34Hl4Mm027840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-04 13:47 EST ------- Okay, good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (jna) is APPROVED by me (again) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 18:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041814.m34IEkKD019213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 14:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jna Short Description: Pure Java access to native libraries Owners: walters,konradm Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 18:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440246] Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041821.m34ILwtc020849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firecontrol - A console oriented tool for Linux to access a FireWire bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440246 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-04-04 14:21 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 18:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041827.m34IRqrf003813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 14:27 EST ------- This seems to leave lualibdir/luasql unowned. Also, one of the subpackages seems to require the main package, which seems a bit odd, given that it creates a circular dependency unless I'm missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 18:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041842.m34IgfHx006956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 18:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239164] Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041854.m34IsXhB026846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SinFP - Full operating system stack fingerprinting suite Alias: perl-Net-SinFP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239164 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 14:54 EST ------- I guess it's time for another monthly ping on this ticket. Is there any chance that this could move forward? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 18:59:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041859.m34IxIt4027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 14:59 EST ------- So what's going on here? Richard, if you want to submit a perl-Net-FTPServer package then please go ahead. I doubt it will take long to get it reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 19:38:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041938.m34Jcs4a018495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 15:38 EST ------- I'm guessing that upstream never clarified, but in any case I don't think it matters much as we have the license * source files match upstream: 8d1f277c541d2638f8be3fa5ebb01762e01ce9d1792ae7bcdca443716964bf59 textile-2.0.11.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-textile = 2.0.11-3.fc9 = python(abi) = 2.5 python-twisted-core * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no ability to test this software. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * egg-info files are built and included in the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 19:41:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804041941.m34Jfsw1004898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 15:41 EST ------- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042008.m34K8cOa024951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 16:08 EST ------- This failed to build for me in mock (x86_64, rawhide). The build log is nasty due to parallel make but I see this: mock.Root.build: linux/syscall-linux.c:75:22: error: asm/page.h: No such file or directory This header doesn't seem to exist in rawhide, although it exists in F8. It seems that it's been removed intentionally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:19:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042019.m34KJ22D013102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 xjakub at fi.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-04-04 16:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute Short Description: Rapid generation of permutations Owners: mjakubicek Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042039.m34KdLSS017320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-04-04 16:39 EST ------- Too bad. Well, maybe when Peter finds some free time, we can revisit this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042043.m34KhnSn032054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language Alias: tzdata-java-epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 16:43 EST ------- Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines " The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm. When in doubt, ask. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 20:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042050.m34KoamH019695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-04 16:50 EST ------- Google says that user visible asm/page.h was removed in 2.6.25-rc5. But the syscall-linux.c file doesn't need to include it. I will prepare an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042129.m34LTcDK009182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 17:29 EST ------- javasqlite-20080401-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042136.m34LauDU029217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-04 17:36 EST ------- lualibdir/luasql is now owner by all database sub-packages. The require is broken. In the first incarnation I actually had this require because the documentation was in the main package. Then I split this and now the lua-sql is kind of a meta-package to pull in everything. New version of spec file uploaded, new SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-sql-2.1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:36:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227118] Review Request: tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-1jpp - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042136.m34LaRCX010554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-1jpp - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227118 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|needinfo?(rafaels at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-04 17:36 EST ------- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tanukiwrapper See also bug 434880 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042138.m34LcxTh010911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dbhole at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-04 17:38 EST ------- Hmm, tanukiwrapper already has a maintainer for the devel branch according to pkgdb (dbhole), and two co-maintainers for other branches but no "main" maintainer for them: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tanukiwrapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042138.m34Lc96w010795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 17:38 EST ------- Yes, much better now. rpmlint says: stringtemplate.noarch: W: no-documentation There seems to be quite a bit of documentation in the package, including some license text. Certainly the three .txt files need to be included, and at least doc.html in the doc subdirectory seems to be useful as well. stringtemplate.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog Please follow one of the standard formats for changelog entries: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs I need to whip up a review template for Java; I'll get on that now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:45:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042145.m34Lj6jG012378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 17:45 EST ------- Well, I promised I'd ping every couple of months, and I'm about a week late. Any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042143.m34LhAN9011855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 17:43 EST ------- I guess it's time to ping again. I see that upstream is still active but there's been no news of a release on their web site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] New: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-File-Find.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-File-Find-1.3.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-File-Find-build.log Description: File_Find, created as a replacement for its Perl counterpart, also named File_Find, is a directory searcher, which handles, globbing, recursive directory searching, as well as a slew of other cool features. -- This package is a new "requires" for next version of php-pear-PHP-CompatInfo I maintain. Test suite is broken, mostly because search result is not always the same. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042150.m34Loj7Y013455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-04 17:50 EST ------- I am on the mailing list and indeed it is getting closer. I'd say a couple of weeks or even less. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 21:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042157.m34LvFCh014554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-04 17:57 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-textile Short Description: A Humane Web Text Generator Owners: thm Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042204.m34M4x7o001417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 18:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042209.m34M9G7O016651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 18:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042212.m34MCFjV017453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-04 18:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:27:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042227.m34MRN4q005431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 18:27 EST ------- I noticed something that looks like a test suite; it is possible to run it at build time? The package seems to be missing a versioned dependency on java as required by the guidelines. * source files match upstream: 59fa7e74646ef4767a6d55356c580d5f24d1392ef89fbd0c435c6426353aaf7c stringtemplate-3.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text in tarball but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. X final provides and requires not quite correct: stringtemplate = 3.1-1.fc9 = jpackage-utils (no java dependency) ? %check is not present, but there seems to be a test suite upstream. I've no idea how to run it, though. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Java-specific bits: * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:31:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042231.m34MVqS8021027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-04-04 18:31 EST ------- Imported and built for Rawhide. I've also built this for F-7 and F-8, but will wait to do the push until ballz, manaworld, and guichan are all ready. guichan is built for F-7 and F-8, but is waiting to be added to the build root so that manaworld and ballz can be rebuilt. Closing this, and will follow up with Hans via email to coordinate the other package rebuilds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042239.m34Md8k2007083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-04 18:39 EST ------- David, you can ask for CVS branch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042240.m34Megun007710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-04 18:40 EST ------- Package Review based on version https://agave.garden.org/~aaronh/rpm/gnue-common-0.6.9-2.src.rpm + my memories of spec 0.6.9-3 (which I've read but not preserved) I cannot check 0.6.9-3, neither https://agave.garden.org/ nor http://agave.garden.org/ seem to be up for the momen t Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: gnue-common.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnue/sample.connections.conf gnue-common.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gnue/sample.gnue.conf --> ignorable given the comments in the spec [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package:4fe0472e345ef5b544a4db8cf44b104a6ba45f3d gnue-common-0.6.9.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:all archs supported by koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === Everything seems OK so far. I still have to verify functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:43:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042243.m34Mhklh022647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 18:43 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The compiler is not called with the proper flags. This leads to a broken debuginfo package, among other issues. It looks like you'll need to patch the "config" file as it overwrites the passed CFLAGS. * source files match upstream: 226db0b2903e2a04de0ad0a71e53a0f629683a61172c228a3e7d416c226101ca luafilesystem-1.4.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not correct. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X debuginfo package is not complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: lfs.so()(64bit) lua-filesystem = 1.4.0-1.fc9 = lua >= 5.1 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I do not know how to test this software. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 22:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042254.m34MsAc9009768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-04 18:54 EST ------- I'm setting the CFLAGS to %{optflags} now (I didn't pass anything yet). I have to add an additional "-fPIC" or otherwise I get the following compiler error (on x86_64): /usr/bin/ld: src/lfs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC src/lfs.o: could not read symbols: Bad value Does that satisfy debuginfo generation? New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-filesystem-1.4.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:10:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042310.m34NAQgb027126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042310.m34NAVS0012953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 19:10 EST ------- Yes, debuginfo is OK now. Do note that I see the following unpleasant compiler warnings: src/lfs.c: In function 'get_dir': src/lfs.c:112: warning: implicit declaration of function 'free' src/lfs.c:112: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' which will probably cause a build failure if we ever turn on -Werror-implicit-function-declaration by default. Do note also that your passing of CFLAGS disables the default -I arguments that the makefile passes. It turns out that it's only /usr/include so you should be OK. Anyway, everything looks acceptable now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042323.m34NNKh8014817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-04 19:23 EST ------- You are right, I have created a trivial patch to fix the problem and included it in http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-filesystem-1.4.0-3.fc8.src.rpm and sent it upstream. Are you willing to take over the other reviews of my Lua packages (440677 to 440681) as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042325.m34NPWGS029542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-04 19:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-filesystem Short Description: File System Library for Lua Owners: timn Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:28:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042328.m34NShwL029936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 19:28 EST ------- I'm working on lua-posix at the moment. These packages are mostly trivial so I should be able to work through them pretty quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042331.m34NV2mQ016333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 19:31 EST ------- python-textile-2.0.11-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042334.m34NY3Zf030707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 19:34 EST ------- This package has the same issue with compiler flags and incomplete debuginfo package. You can test the debuginfo package by doing a koji scratch build and looking at the file list; if it doesn't include any source code then something has gone off. Another good test is to look through the build log and grep for lines with cc or gcc that don't contain "FORTIFY_SOURCE". There's a test script included, but I don't know quite enough about lua to tell how you would run it or if its possible to run it at build time. It would be good to run it if possible. * source files match upstream: f38a5b838495952bae8bd99fde2ac14a21c12947b426f26366a9299766419952 luaposix-5.1.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * no license text to include (public domain). * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not correct. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X debuginfo package is incomplete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: lua-posix = 5.1.2-1.fc9 = lua >= 5.1 ? %check is not present, but there's some sort of test suite included. I don't know how to run it, however. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:35:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042335.m34NZVhX017117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 19:35 EST ------- python-textile-2.0.11-4.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042333.m34NXip8016538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-04 19:33 EST ------- According to http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html, the category Application is not valid. Everything else seems OK. I will post a full review once I test it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042344.m34NivkZ018133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 19:44 EST ------- * On the tests, I just created two patches (both sent upstream). The first adds a convenient "ant test" target, and the second disables some of the tests which upstream had either left broken, or as far as I could tell the test was actually itself broken. The vast majority of tests pass. * Fixed license. * Fixed requires. New versions: http://cdn.verbum.org/stringtemplate.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/stringtemplate-3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042359.m34NxMoa002037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 4 23:59:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804042359.m34NxBRa020242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-04 19:59 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv3 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: db3e28e77db916ba6b0f4d45d69406de00a9ba14 acetoneiso2_2.0.1-source.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64, F7/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1.see comment #1 === Final Notes === Please fix the desktop file before uploading to CVS ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050005.m3505EOi003587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 20:05 EST ------- Builds OK; rpmlint says: lua-socket.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/lua-socket-2.0.2/LICENSE Uses 0xA9 for the copyright symbol; will need a pass through iconv. Looks like this has the same issue with compiler flags and the debuginfo package that the other packages had. rpm's automatic dependency calculation decides this provides core.so, which probably isn't right. But that's a bug in rpm, not in this package. You might consider packaging the samples and the stuff in etc as %doc. Up to you. * source files match upstream: 4fd9c775cfd98841299851e29b30176caf289370fea1ff1e00bb67c2d6842ca6 luasocket-2.0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are incorrect. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X debuginfo package is incomplete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: core.so()(64bit) lua-socket = 2.0.2-1.fc9 = lua >= 5.1 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I do not know how to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050013.m350DKJH004691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 20:13 EST ------- This seems to have cropped up, or did I somehow miss it earlier: stringtemplate.src:42: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Normally you don't need to erase the build root in %build, because it should be empty before %install. Why do you need to do that? Otherwise, things look good: The license text is present. The dependencies look correct: stringtemplate-3.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm stringtemplate = 3.1-1.fc9 = java >= 1:1.6.0 jpackage-utils stringtemplate-javadoc-3.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm stringtemplate-javadoc = 3.1-1.fc9 = java-javadoc %check is now present, and the tests pass: [junit] Tests run: 279, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.28 sec So, because another round trip probably isn't productive, I'll approve this on the condition that you remove the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" bit from %build. Or, if you need it for something, let's investigate why. APPROVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050016.m350GTbq023362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-04 20:16 EST ------- Unless I missed something, the LICENSE_1_0.txt and README are not in the main package, would be better if they were there. You should drop BuildRequires: bzip2-libs The license tag should simply be: Boost Maybe the flag could be --with-python-root=%{_prefix} instead of --with-python-root=/usr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050019.m350JEJn023668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 20:19 EST ------- Unfortunately this now fails to build: gcc -O2 -I../compat/src -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -I/usr/include -fPIC -c -o src/ls_postgres.o src/ls_postgres.c export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET="10.3"; gcc -O2 -I../compat/src -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -I/usr/include -fPIC -o src/postgres.so -shared src/luasql.o src/ls_postgres.o -lpgport -lxslt -lxml2 -lpam -lssl -lcrypto -lgssapi_krb5 -lz -lreadline -lcrypt -ldl -lm /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lxslt collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Needs a build dependency on libxslt, perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:21:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050021.m350LZ6x006153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 20:21 EST ------- Oops, thanks. Yeah I think that was there before. Will fix before commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050020.m350KmiE006004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050022.m350MRv2006261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 20:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stringtemplate Short Description: A Java template engine Owners: walters,konradm Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050027.m350RBZk007020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 20:27 EST ------- Updates to this one coming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 00:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050057.m350vSXh029586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-04 20:57 EST ------- Ok, new, much saner versions: http://cdn.verbum.org/java-gnome.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/java-gnome-4.0.6-0.1.20080404bzr.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 01:04:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050104.m3514XpF030956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 21:04 EST ------- I like how the code says that the LICENSE file is in the tarball when it's not. Thanks for commenting on the issues surrounding the test suite. Everything looks good to me. * source files match upstream: 662dc82e1efe327bca3a18f585b1fbd8207f2c88da3b06492be14ec8c3aa4e8d File_Find-1.3.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (can't check the French versions) * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear-File-Find = 1.3.0-1.fc9 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 01:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050138.m351cdVY003640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 21:38 EST ------- latex2emf-1.0.0-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 01:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050137.m351bNCs017691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-04 21:37 EST ------- latex2emf-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 01:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050141.m351fd2x004319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 21:41 EST ------- Builds fine. rpmlint says: preupgrade.src: W: strange-permission preupgrade.spec 0600 which is a little weird but isn't a blocker. (If it were 666, that would be a problem.) Is there no URL where the source can be downloaded? Where does the tarball come from? BuildRoot should be one of the values from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot or at minimum should include %{release} in addition to what's there. You can shorten BuildArchitectures: as BuildArch: if you like to save typing. (I only mention it because vim highlights it oddly; the 'itectures' is a different color.) You can remove the tests that ensure the buildroot isn't '/'; rpmbuild does that for you. I was under the impression that Red Hat-developed code was GPLv2 only. Not really my business as the License: tag matches the source code, but I figured I'd ask. I notice you don't use the dist tag. Your choice, of course; I assume you know how to deal with its absence. ? can't check that the sources match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. X build root is not OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(preupgrade) = 0.9-1 preupgrade = 0.9-1 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/python config(preupgrade) = 0.9-1 python >= 2.1 python(abi) = 2.5 rpm >= 0:4.1.1 rpm-python usermode yum >= 3.2.8 yum-metadata-parser * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed this on a rawhide box and it ran well enough, although it doesn't really do much in that case. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 01:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 21:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437491] Request for package : PgWorksheet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050155.m351tLII006470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Request for package : PgWorksheet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437491 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 21:55 EST ------- Henri, did you intend to submit a package for review? This isn't really the proper place to request that packages be added to Fedora unless you're willing to get involved with the packaging work. If you don't have a package to submit, please consider adding your request to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 02:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050204.m3524BuY021803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 22:04 EST ------- Not much to this, it seems. I guess the package.xml file is the only place to find the license; the code itself carries no license info. * source files match upstream: f138f70a4ab984c3d5d2087f475bb444f78f68cb950de02756073cc92b5fc700 3_01.txt 96b8d6df0aaea17d68997b637027793517be3bbbdce632ba12f8f283aab64020 StubManager-1.2.0.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mediawiki-StubManager = 1.2.0-1.fc9 = mediawiki >= 1.10 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I'm not sure how you would go about testing this, anyway. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED Ping me when this is in rawhide and I'll review mediawiki-HNP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 02:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050204.m3524ZCc007790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 22:04 EST ------- Erm, forgot the rest of the bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 02:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430399] Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050243.m352ht73028526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430399 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 22:43 EST ------- I actually went looking for this the other day, only to find it sitting in the review queue for two months. The license actually looks like the MIT license to me; the kerberos portion is definitely the old-style MIT license and the rest is yet another modern version. I'd use "MIT" for the License: tag. Not that there's a significant distinction, but we do separate the two for some reason I doubt I'd understand. * source files match upstream: 120320685f67776f823830c93a154a5960209f2e09f55e0519debcd18e89ffea kstart-3.10.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field should be MIT. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: kstart = 3.10-1.fc9 = libkrb5.so.3()(64bit) libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT)(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I'm not quite sure how I'd test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. I'll go ahead and approve this on the condition that you agree with the license change. If you don't, let me know and we can discuss it. Otherwise, fix it up when you commit. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 03:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438805] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050301.m3531NxQ018101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438805 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 23:01 EST ------- Builds fine; rpmlint says: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql.noarch: W: no-documentation which is indeed the case; there's no documentation in the tarball. * source files match upstream: 7a051e90c63897701a93c9d3b02d79e6c696240c552694cf34cbc7eab6284691 MDB2_Driver_pgsql-1.4.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: php-pear(MDB2_Driver_pgsql) = 1.4.1 php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql = 1.4.1-1.fc9 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-pear(MDB2) >= 2.4.1 php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.4.0b1 * %check is not present. There seem to be some tests in the package, but they would require a configured postgres server and it's not generally possible to run PHP tests at build time. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (pear module registration). * code, not content. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 03:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050355.m353toSt026289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-04 23:55 EST ------- Finally have some time. This builds OK; rpmlint says: php-pear-propel_runtime.src:106: W: macro-in-%changelog buildroot You need to double percent signs in your changelog so that they aren't expanded. php-pear-propel_runtime.noarch: W: no-documentation which is true; there doesn't seem to be any documentation at all in the tarball. The license is a bit odd. First off, I think it's LGPLv2+, because the version is not specified anywhere and the LGPL allows us to choose any version at all in that case. However, if you look upstream, they say that they've relicensed Apache 2 licenced code to LGPL. I sort of understand what the situation would be if they had licensed to GPL, as only GPLv3 is compatible with ASLv2 so the result would be GPLv3+. But I really don't know about LGPL. Honestly seeing that they've just decided to relicense others code to an incompatible license makes me rather nervous. Blocking legal for input on the license compatibility, and someone should really check with upstream about what version of the LGPL they actually intend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050405.m3545c4F009134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 00:05 EST ------- A few comments: When you have versioned libraries like /usr/lib64/libtun6.so.0.1.1, the unversioned .so file must be in the -devel package. The non-executable-script complaints happens because the miredo.conf file starts with the usual interpreter line: #! /usr/sbin/miredo -f -c indicating that it's supposed to be executed, but the file isn't actually executable. I don't think this is a big problem, but I don't really understand why the file starts with that line. You can find nice guidelines for SysV-style initscripts at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript and for examples, just look in /etc/init.d. I would definitely advise splitting off a miredo-server package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050408.m35487Bv009386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 00:08 EST ------- When I attempt to build this in mock, I get: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This script requires setuptools version 0.6c5 to run (even to display help). I will attempt to download it for you (from http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/), but you may need to enable firewall access for this script first. I will start the download in 15 seconds. (Note: if this machine does not have network access, please obtain the file http://cheeseshop.python.org/packages/2.5/s/setuptools/setuptools-0.6c5-py2.5.egg and place it in this directory before rerunning this script.) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- which obviously isn't going to work as mock cannot access the network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050427.m354RQ1w031011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 00:27 EST ------- Builds OK; rpmlint says: pyfits.src:26: W: setup-not-quiet Not a big deal; you can fix it by using "%setup -q". pyfits.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfits/NP_pyfits.py 0644 pyfits.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyfits/NA_pyfits.py 0644 These files start with #!/whatever but aren't executable. For some reason, python programmers like to start all of their files that way even when they aren't supposed to be executable. I have no idea why, but I've given up trying to fix every package which does this. If you want it to go away, strip the first lines of those files in %prep: sed -i -e "1d" lib/NP_pyfits.py lib/NA_pyfits.py Why does this require python-setuputils at runtime? There is an included test suite. If it's possible to run it at build time then you should add a %check section. * source files match upstream: a6b01c9d75e7955765019581700bd6ac344457b327522facedaf4cff9e86093c pyfits-1.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. ? not sure about the setuptools dependency: pyfits = 1.3-1 = numpy python(abi) = 2.5 ? python-setuptools ? %check is not present, but there seems to be an included test suite. I am not sure how to run it. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438897] Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050434.m354Yb4A032235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: framewave - Image and signal processing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438897 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 00:34 EST ------- Could you comment on the compiler flags? This doesn't make use of the usual set of compiler flags, although -g is there so at least the debuginfo package is OK. Unfortunately I know nothing about scons so I don't know how to get the right flags in there, and this is odd numerical software so maybe there's a reason that they're not used. Otherwise, rpmlint just complains about some unused-direct-shlib-dependency bits, but the package as a whole seems OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050436.m354a4Tm013857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-04-05 00:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301361) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301361&action=view) fox pc patch pc patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050437.m354bPiE013989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-04-05 00:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301362) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301362&action=view) fox-config patch fox-config.patch it should fix the links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050439.m354dQ5K000585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 00:39 EST ------- This builds OK but it won't install: root: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /mock/fedora-development-x86_64/root/ install /mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/python-toscawidgets-0.2-0.3.20080320svn4283.fc9.noarch.rpm Error: Missing Dependency: python-decorator is needed by package python-toscawidgets Maybe it's python-decoratortools that's needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050446.m354kBxx001813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-04-05 00:46 EST ------- I have updated the spec file and also the src.rpm file. It is still rough so I acknowledge that clean up is required. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox-1.7.15-3.fc9.src.rpm What I need to know is content wise what needs to change to get it approved. Adie.stx needs to be done. Is there anything else? Apologies for the delay in patching stuff I had to read a lot since I've never patched the pc file or fox-config file so I'm a bit slow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 04:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050447.m354lKhF015445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 00:47 EST ------- This failed to build in mock for me: Check for required jar files: - JUnit test framework not found! In order to build java-gnome, you need junit.jar (looked in /usr/share/java) which is part of the JUnit test framework Java library. On a Fedora system, you should be able to get this requirement by doing: # yum install junit Failed to complete configuration. I added a build dependency on junit and the build fails later: + make install DESTDIR=/var/tmp/java-gnome-4.0.6-0.1.20080404bzr.fc9-2XFrfw /usr/bin/env: python: Permission denied which I admit I don't completely understand. However, python is not in the build root, so I added it and the build fails later: + make install DESTDIR=/var/tmp/java-gnome-4.0.6-0.1.20080404bzr.fc9-zqtPuh sh: pkg-config: command not found sh: pkg-config: command not found MKDIR tmp/stamp/ [...] Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. JAVA BindingsGenerator JAVAC src/bindings/*.java, generated/bindings/*.java src/bindings/org/freedesktop/cairo/Surface.java:28: destroy(org.freedesktop.cairo.ImageSurface) in org.freedesktop.cairo.CairoSurface cannot be applied to (org.freedesktop.cairo.Surface) CairoSurface.destroy(this); ^ [several other analogous complaints] 9 errors make: *** [build-java] Error 1 I've no clue what to add to get past this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 05:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050501.m3551Ttb004074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 05:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050501.m3551FwC017626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-05 01:01 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-File-Find Short Description: Class which facilitates the search of filesystems Owners: remi Branches: F-7, F-8, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 05:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050517.m355HnIJ020241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 01:17 EST ------- A few comments as I come up to speed with reviewing Java packages using our fancy new guidelines: This builds and installs OK. rpmlint says: javahelp2.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 31) Not a big deal; fix it if you like. javahelp2.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Java This is fine; we don't really care about Group. javahelp2.src: E: no-changelogname-tag There is no changelog section at all. One is required, and the entries need to be in one of the formats from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs javahelp2.src: W: strange-permission javahelp2-jhindexer.sh 0755 javahelp2.src: W: strange-permission javahelp2-jhsearch.sh 0755 This isn't a real problem; usually you don't depend on permissions on files extracted from the srpm but as long as they aren't mode 666 or something it's not an issue. It would be nice for you to answer Colin's question from comment 1. The summary, well, isn't really a summary. Can you come up with a 70-character summary of this package? According to the guidelines, you need an epoch on your java-devel requirement: BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 The main package needs a dependency on java and the javadoc package needs at least a dependency on jpackage-utils (so that /usr/share/javadoc is owned properly). There seems to be some sort of test suite in jhMaster/JavaHelp/test. I do not know if it is something that is runnable at build time, but if it is then you need to add a %check section. * source files match upstream: 338b3888bd3b058a6d9c65ad5fe15d4effbe6c13a15d6da1c5390a06f0b69757 javahelp2-src-2.0.05.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X No changelog section. X summary isn't really a summary. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires not quite right. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. X final provides and requires are not quite right: javahelp2-2.0.05-3.fc9.noarch.rpm javahelp2 = 0:2.0.05-3.fc9 = /bin/sh jpackage-utils >= 0:1.5.32 X (no dependency on java) javahelp2-javadoc-2.0.05-3.fc9.noarch.rpm javahelp2-javadoc = 0:2.0.05-3.fc9 = X (no dependency on jpackage-utils) ? %check is not present, but there seems to be a test suite. Can it be run at build time? * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Java-specific bits: * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. * javadocs are under _javadocdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 05:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050529.m355Thx4021956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 01:29 EST ------- Is anything happening here? Jose, dod you have a response to the question Patrice posed above? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 05:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050541.m355fouh010101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-04-05 01:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-StubManager Short Description: An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 05:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 01:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050559.m355xWwG012458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2008-04-05 01:59 EST ------- It requires the python-decorator package (Bug #438354), which looks to be approved but not yet imported or built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 07:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 03:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050705.m3575UVl022818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 assim.deodia at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-04-05 03:05 EST ------- Thanks. Have made the builds(OLPC2 and devel). Closed the ticcket as NEXTRELEASE. Is there anything else to be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 07:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 03:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050705.m3575VVN022855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 Bug 432259 depends on bug 433253, which changed state. Bug 433253 Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 07:45:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 03:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050745.m357jrZb009878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-05 03:45 EST ------- BTW well-known instant messenger, Miranda-IM, includes internal version of libyahoo2. Are there any interesting patches which could be incorporated into source shipped with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 08:24:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 04:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050824.m358OeFw004096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-05 04:24 EST ------- * Sat Apr 5 2008 Dan Horak 1.3.2-2 - fix compile in rawhide (kernel >= 2.6.25-rc5) Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski-1.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050900.m3590TF1024342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-05 05:00 EST ------- - Fixed CFLAGS, debuginfo package contains source files now - %check is useless here, the test script will output a bunch of informational output that the user then has to verify. It will not stop in case of an error. New SRPM at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-posix-5.1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437491] Request for package : PgWorksheet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050906.m3596mjq025841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Request for package : PgWorksheet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437491 ------- Additional Comments From hmichelon at gmail.com 2008-04-05 05:06 EST ------- Thanks Jason, I add it to the wishlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050908.m3598sah012441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-05 05:08 EST ------- - Pass %{optflags} as CFLAGS - Use iconv to produce proper UTF8 LICENSE file New SRPM at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-socket-2.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050914.m359EtKf026967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-05 05:14 EST ------- REVIEW: MUST Items: + rpmlint silent. + The package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + File, containing the text of the license(s) for the package included in %doc. + The spec file written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum fusecompress-1.99.14.tar.gz* a1342b263ae1d115af5c11568bdedd72 fusecompress-1.99.14.tar.gz a1342b263ae1d115af5c11568bdedd72 fusecompress-1.99.14.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiled and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies listed in BuildRequires. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + All files, a package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: + Works for me. As to /usr/sbin/mount.fusecompress - I don't think this is an issue since we may easily use this package w/o it completely. So if someone will find some bugs related to this script he should fill a bug. So it's APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050917.m359H59E027549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-05 05:17 EST ------- libxml2, libxslt and libpam are required by PostgreSQL 8.3 on rawhide - you might think. But the problem lies deeper: I was using pg_config and mysql_config, assuming that they produce proper flags for building clients - failed! They show which flags where used to build the libs and server, cf. bug #440673. I now pass the proper flags without the "config" tools. Scratch build executed successfully for dist-f9 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=550145). New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/luastuff/lua-sql-2.1.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050928.m359SN0d029218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomas.moschny at gmx.de ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-05 05:28 EST ------- Ok, I can do the review. Some remarks: - you probably should move the xxdiff-tools to a subpackage, because they require python, whereas xxdiff itself does not - please use the standard %python_sitelib macro definition, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python - build the python files in %build %{__python} setup.py build - no need to record INSTALLED_FILES. something like %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} should do - consider creating an egg-info for f7 and f8, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#head-4ac98208bf2f5a13b9cd997c91e2e424f67a7e35 - instead of "cd src; make ...; cd -", use "make -C src ..." - clean the buildroot at the beginning of %install - license is "GPLv2+", no? - please remove the shebang lines from the .py files in %python_sitelib, using 'find .. -exec %{__sed} -i "1{/^#!/d}" {} \;' or similar, to make rpmlint quiet - qt4-devel doesn't provide qt-devel, so (imho) no need for a versioned BR on qt-devel Is there a reason why this review request is non-public? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 09:33:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804050933.m359XqeP016363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436754] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051000.m35A0Yu1020560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-FastPermute - Rapid generation of permutations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436754 xjakub at fi.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] New: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alexl at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice-ooolatex.spec SRPM URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice.org-ooolatex-4.0.0-0.beta2.1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This program allows the editing, display and saving of LaTeX equations inside OpenOffice.org Writer and Impress documents Note: there is currently a bug (bug 440650) in the F-8 version of unopkg in openoffice.org currently in updates-testing that prevents clean installation on F-8. However, it should work on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:24:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051024.m35AOmqi023969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-04-05 06:24 EST ------- I see... I'll fix the first rpmlint warning and I've just written to propel-dev about the licensing issue asking for clarification. However at http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/wiki/Users/Introduction/License upstream states, >>Note that the LGPL is a more restrictive license than the Apache 2 license used for Apache Torque, from which Propel is derived. Propel complies with the terms of the Apache license by providing the necessary disclaimer text and not using the name "Torque" or "Apache" in the name.<< What do you think..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051026.m35AQkgG005821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ooolatex -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051027.m35ARe1s005920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |440650 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:37:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051037.m35AbXoD026238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caolanm at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-05 06:37 EST ------- Cc'ing Caolan as the most experienced OOo extension packager for feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 10:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051036.m35AaGLb007386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-05 06:36 EST ------- Also with the new texlive package in rawhide/F-9: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive I'm not sure what the canonical requires for latex should be, so I used file level requires, e.g. Requires: /usr/bin/latex it would be nice if there were Requires that would work the same on both rawhide and on F-7 & F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 12:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 08:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051237.m35CbRQC013729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 hans at velum.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hans at velum.net ------- Additional Comments From hans at velum.net 2008-04-05 08:37 EST ------- Hi - I'm the lead developer for Propel. We haven't really had licensing questions come up, as is probably not surprising for a small, PHP project. That's not an excuse for having a bad license, merely an explanation of why we could find ourselves in this position now. I will note that I definitely spent some time researching this back in 2002 when the project started -- and know that I talked to the Torque folks about this question -- but I also will concede that there is clearly explicit documentation now indicating that these licenses are incompatible. So, not sure exactly what informed the decision that LGPL was compatible. We would like to resolve this problem (and respect the license of source work!); I am certain that getting the contributors to agree to a license change to a Apache-based license (e.g. PHP license?) will not be a problem. To correct our wiki document, original Propel was based on Torque at a time when I'm quite certain was actually the Apache 1.1 license. My understanding is that Apache 2 license wasn't released until much after original Propel release. I don't think that changes the basic problem here. I will work with the developers to get this resolved in a timely manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 13:22:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051322.m35DMsUk021451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-04-05 09:22 EST ------- FWIW, you could probably use echo yes | unopkg add --shared --link %{ooolatexext} || : instead of patching out the "do you agree to GPL" foo to reduce the patch. Maybe it'd be worth just unpacking it and applying the patch in %prep and doing a standard copy of that tree in %install rather than unpacking %{SOURCE0} in %install. Just to try and look as "normal" as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 13:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051338.m35DcqUx023819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-05 09:38 EST ------- No, all you should do is done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 13:43:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051343.m35DhGNM024600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-05 09:43 EST ------- Just a info: F-9 final development freeze is due on Apr 8th. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 14:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218256] Review Request: audacious-itouch-control - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051400.m35E0UAu008293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audacious-itouch-control - iTouch keyboard control plugin for the Audacious media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218256 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(yufanyufan at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-05 10:00 EST ------- Yu, unfortunately this project is dead upstream, so I suggest we close this review. Not even sure if it is still compatible with the current audacious API. If you are still interesting in maintaining an audacious package you could do audacious-show from http://nedudu.hu/?Programok:Audacious_pluginok. There already was a review for it but the reporter has withdrawn the request, see bug #234830 Setting this bug to NEEDINFO. If I don't hear anything from you within the next 2 weeks I'll close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 14:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051402.m35E2ZPe008758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-05 10:02 EST ------- Use "full-featured, platform-independent, extensible help system", I do not care. Log is missing, because mandriva generates the log file automatically from svn logs. Just think something up, it is first fedora release anyway. We do not really control upstream project, that is why I prefer not to add anything there. I know nothing about the test suite. I never tried to run it. My expectation is that it will miss some fancy test harness from Sun. All that you want to change is OK from my point of view. I just want the library to be package. I do not care much how. Thanks a lot for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 14:22:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051422.m35EM9vF012010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-05 10:22 EST ------- everything seems OK, only odd thing is that patch2 is not applied. I'll come back a bit later after I test it. Sadly, it does not build for F-7 (i.e. I cannot test on my sacrifice box == my workstation) so I have to try on another computer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 15:49:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051549.m35FnJ5m012044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-05 11:49 EST ------- Thanks, I fixed the build deps and re-uploaded new versions. http://cdn.verbum.org/java-gnome.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/java-gnome-4.0.6-0.1.20080404bzr.fc9.src.rpm Basically we were missing glade2-devel (and its deps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438354] Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051604.m35G43eV014891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438354 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |438433 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051604.m35G42SI014854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |438354 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 12:04 EST ------- Ah. I'll set the dependencies correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:09:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051609.m35G9FO2028741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-05 12:09 EST ------- Please have a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051610.m35GAhxC016353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-05 12:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > bcond_with is feature, that's not a bug of spec file. Can you explain why you don't want to use it? It is practical and consistent with other packages. I even remember having seen it in some guidelines, but there shouldn't be a need for guidelines. The review is here to ensure maximal quality, the conditionals are part of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051644.m35GiAmE021324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-05 12:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051647.m35Gl0nB002338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-05 12:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051649.m35GnCMA022089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-05 12:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 16:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051650.m35Gonfo003008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-05 12:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:00:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051700.m35H0XIY004538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-05 13:00 EST ------- Clearing the fedora-cvs flag here until the package is approved (fedora-review: +) Dennis: Can you take a look and approve this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439911] Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051707.m35H7edD025462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439911 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 18:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051814.m35IEjZp003442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 ------- Additional Comments From aaronh at garden.org 2008-04-05 14:14 EST ------- Those files should be accessible, now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051752.m35HqLd2012860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-05 13:52 EST ------- mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051758.m35Hwu7U013715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 18:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051811.m35IBkQj003241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-05 14:11 EST ------- I think that the source url would better be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 The default examples/default.lnk would certainly benefit with something like sed -e -i 's:/usr/local/share/idesk/:%{_datadir}/idesk/:' examples/default.lnk Also the default use Xdialog which is not packaged in fedora. I plan to submit it, but it is not obvious that it is a good example. Maybe using xmessage would be better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:58:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051758.m35HwvIP013736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 Bug 439345 depends on bug 439338, which changed state. Bug 439338 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051752.m35HqLMP032358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-05 13:52 EST ------- mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-05 13:52 EST ------- mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:20:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051720.m35HKDXw007908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-05 13:20 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 17:19:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051719.m35HJetM007515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-05 13:19 EST ------- It looks good now Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 18:37:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051837.m35IbjlQ007767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-05 14:37 EST ------- @Ville Skytt? is there is still a problem with this package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 18:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440999] Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051836.m35Ia3ur007637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File-Find - Class which facilitates the search of filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440999 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 19:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437491] Request for package : PgWorksheet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051930.m35JUFGk028545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Request for package : PgWorksheet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437491 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 19:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051931.m35JVijk028817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-05 15:31 EST ------- 1.35.0 is out, and there are certainly fixes to allow to have cxxflags be put after default flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 19:34:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] New: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bogado at bogado.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid.spec SRPM URL: http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid-0.6.00-1bog.src.rpm Description: This package has a library and some tools that allows communication with a wiimote using a bluetooth connection. The package creates four different rpm files: - cwiid : base library. - cwiid-devel : development files. - cwiid-python2 : python bindings. - cwiid-wmgui : test program with a gtk gui. - cwiid-wminput : Program that allows user to control mouse/keyboard with the wiimote (this package is affected by the bug #401951 '"/dev/input/uinput" without user rights (0600 root root)'). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 19:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051936.m35JaDxo016961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-05 15:36 EST ------- Ps. homepage of the packaged software: http://abstrakraft.org/cwiid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 19:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051941.m35Jf0U9030380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-05 15:40 EST ------- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/joda-time.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/joda-time-1.5.2-4.tzdata2008b.fc8.src.rpm Sorry for the delay, I've been busy these last few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 19:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804051943.m35JhE5B030664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-05 15:43 EST ------- I think there must be some confusion here. If this package is approved, you will the maintainer of the package in Fedora. Therefore it is up to you to care about things like the summary and the changelog. What Mandriva does is of absolutely no consequence here; you must provide a package which is acceptable to Fedora. You shouldn't tell me to add something, because my function is to check the package for acceptability, not to apply any fixes to it. I understand that you want the library to be packaged, but your role in the process is far more than just dropping the package in a bugzilla ticket and being done with it. You must maintain it in Fedora. You must respond to bugzilla tickets filed against it and such, issue builds and update notices, etc. You should know about the test suite, or find out about it, because that is your function as the maintainer of the package. Also, I have a feeling from your responses that this is your first package submission, and if that's the case then you will need a sponsor. Honestly I'm going to need to see from you a much greater understanding of how things work in Fedora before I personally would be willing to sponsor you. Thus I'm going to unassign myself from this ticket, and refer you to some documents in our wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 20:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052019.m35KJVRb004218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-05 16:19 EST ------- I never planned for jruby to make F9, and think we should push it as an update rather than rushing it and making a poor impression on users. All the same I feel we're making good, speedy progress :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 20:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052018.m35KIEhc004085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-05 16:18 EST ------- New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/joni.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/joni-1.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm Note: I tried to build with GCJ AOT bits, but this consumed >1.5 gigs of ram and swap before I killed it (and kept growing). So this spec/srpm doesn't build AOT bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 20:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052058.m35KwqtN010395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-05 16:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301389) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301389&action=view) Use system lrmi Using the private lrmi is not nice, something like the attached patch could do the trick. I have no way to check if the result actually works on i386, but it does build. If you apply this, also add %ifarch %{ix86} "BuildRequires: lrmi-devel" to the specfile and "rm -f lrmi.h lrmi.c" in %prep to make sure the bundled lrmi is not used. MIT should probably be dropped from licenses even if system lrmi is not used; lrmi gets built into an LGPLv2+ executable which I think makes the combined work LGPLv2+ and we only list licenses for binaries. %description could be improved, suggestion: Monitor-edid is a tool for probing and parsing Extended display identification data (EDID) from monitors. For more information about EDID, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDID -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 21:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052106.m35L6CrT012045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-05 17:06 EST ------- Ok, so I'll improve without the script for now. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fusecompress Short Description: FUSE based compressed file system implementation Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 22:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 18:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052248.m35MmsMH014467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-04-05 18:48 EST ------- It's seems to be a kind of tummy, but I'll do a package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 23:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052337.m35NbNxI002568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-05 19:37 EST ------- Everything seems OK, I used it for a very simple test program which did actually work as intended, so the package is APPROVED. Just for the record: I did not say anything about including the INSTALL file (which we usually do not ship) only because of the last three lines in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 23:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] New: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ezstream/0.5.3-1/ezstream.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ezstream/0.5.3-1/ezstream-0.5.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Ezstream is a command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers. It began as the successor of the old "shout" utility, and has since gained a lot of useful features. In its basic mode of operation, it streams media files or data from standard input without reencoding and thus requires only very little CPU resources. It can also use various external decoders and encoders to reencode from one format to another, and stream the result to an Icecast server. Additional features include scriptable playlist and metadata handling. All of its features make ezstream a very flexible source client. Supported media formats for streaming are MP3, Ogg Vorbis and Ogg Theora. Native metadata support includes MP3 (ID3v1 only) and Ogg Vorbis, and many more formats when the optional TagLib support has been compiled in (which they are for this package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 23:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052350.m35NokJ4004716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 xjakub at fi.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-04-05 19:50 EST ------- Should/Can I report also bugs (not concerning packaging) now or should I wait until the review process is accomplished and file then bugs against this component when it will be created in bugzilla? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 5 23:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 19:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804052359.m35NxF29005705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 ------- Additional Comments From ricky.zhou at gmail.com 2008-04-05 19:59 EST ------- OK, couple of updates on this. I asked Jeremy Fincher about this, and he said that the official name is "Supybot," but lowercased "supybot" is fine as well. Any other opinions on this? Now, a bigger problem is that some of the included plugins have full python modules packaged with the plugin itself. Some are in Fedora, and some are not. A few aren't even maintained anymore, and at least one seems to be a modified file from another application. I can ask upstream about removing the maintained/unmodified ones (such as dateutil and feedparser), but I'm not quite sure what to do about the others. >From what I've seen, Debian, openSUSE, and Gentoo seem to just leave all of these files in, but that doesn't feel like the right thing to do. Any ideas how to handle this? The full list of of these files is: plugins/Dict/dictclient.py plugins/Google/google.py plugins/Google/GoogleSOAPFacade.py plugins/Google/SOAP.py plugins/Math/convertcore.py plugins/RSS/feedparser.py plugins/Time/dateutil/* Side note: This no longer passes rpmlint since I put a %files macro in the ChangeLog - That'll gone from the next spec file (hopefully along with the plugins problem). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 00:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060011.m360BbNm008129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-05 20:11 EST ------- The safest bet would be to not package those plugins. On the other hand, you could submit (or at least build) them as separate packages. Or bribe someone to package them for you :) We have a couple of very active python maintainers around here, maybe someone would be willing to give a hand. But, as you have anticipated, including private copies of python modules is a big NO NO (in my opinion at least). Maybe this would not violate the letter of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-17396a3b06ec849a7c0c6fc3243673b17e5fed90 but would definitely contradict the spirit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 00:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060018.m360IoFF008967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-05 20:18 EST ------- Thre is one small change I recommend. It is mostly cosmetic but makes the package closer to "preserve timestamps" rule we try to enforce. Please replace: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT with make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" This will preserve the timestamp of the man page. For the rest I concur with Kairo. No need to re-upload the spec/src.rpm just for that, just keep it mind and make sure you add the modification before uploading to CVS, once your package is officialy approved. Chris, I've noticed that you are quite active as a bug reporter and that you have also used mock in the past to rebuild packages locally. I am willing to sponsor you, but before that I would like to either see a couple of [unofficial] reviews performed by you or at least another packaged submitted by you. Could you please do that ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 00:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 20:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060038.m360cowC011809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-05 20:38 EST ------- Is this package intended only for F-9/rawhide ? It does not build for F-8 either... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 02:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 22:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060246.m362kVsR030791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-05 22:46 EST ------- Hum. Should this be named 'fuse-fusecompress' or 'fuse-compress' ? Almost all the other fuse packages are 'fuse-%{name}'. Also, further note that EL5 kernels have NO fuse support. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 03:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 23:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060348.m363mg9Z026825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From gkriehn at csufresno.edu 2008-04-05 23:48 EST ------- Ok, let's work with this new spec file that you've just posted here -- from the above comments, what is still applicable to the new spec file? Yes, I am looking at submitting Enlightenment packages to Fedora/RPMFusion. However, I would like to do it in a structured manner. If you'd like to help, send me an e-mail, and we can work on getting this done together. Thanks, Greg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 04:37:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 00:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060437.m364bnPG014828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-06 00:37 EST ------- Yes, this is Rawhide-only, it's for the KDE 4 Konqueror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 04:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 00:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060443.m364hu6B015757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-06 00:43 EST ------- (The KDE 3 version is part of kdeaddons, by the way.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 05:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 01:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060506.m3656K1Y019767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 01:06 EST ------- I have got JRuby compiling, working, running, etc with Colin's jna, my joda-time and joni, and otherwise Fedora packages. The current problem I'm trying to address is that gems' binaries in MRI and JRuby will conflict. That is, if you install rails in both MRI and JRuby, /usr/bin/rails is contested (there may be better examples of this, but it's a definitely a problem). A solution might be to install jruby in /opt, which, while OK by FHS seems discouraged. I'd like input on this from other Fedora packagers and rubyists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 05:38:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 01:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] New: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ricky.zhou at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-dictclient/python-dictclient.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-dictclient/python-dictclient-1.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A client library for the DICT protocol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 05:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 01:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438354] Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060557.m365vSLw027015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438354 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-04-06 01:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-decorator Short Description: Module to simplify usage of decorators Owners: toshio Branches: F-8 EL-5 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 05:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 01:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438445] Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060558.m365wjeh014197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438445 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-04-06 01:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-cjson Short Description: Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python Owners: toshio Branches: F-8 EL-5 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 06:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060602.m3662qoG015036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 02:02 EST ------- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jruby.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jruby-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Note: This version does not even attempt to separate MRI's stdlib/gems/etc and jruby's; instead, I included ruby as a dependency of jruby's so that jruby can use /usr/lib/ruby. Maybe this is the way to go. It certainly is the easiest. The rationale given to me by the jruby folks for separating the two is that much of ruby's stdlib is non-threadsafe and that jruby's use of system threads vs MRI's use of green threads makes issues surface that otherwise didn't present themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 06:46:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060646.m366kgbg021226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 jtulach at netbeans.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-06 02:46 EST ------- Jason, for some reason you became upset. Sorry for you. Looks like it is my fault, so I apologize for wasting your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 06:47:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436568] Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060647.m366lYxX001624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Supybot - Cross-platform IRC bot written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436568 ------- Additional Comments From ricky.zhou at gmail.com 2008-04-06 02:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > But, as you have anticipated, including private copies of python modules is a > big NO NO (in my opinion at least). Maybe this would not violate the letter of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-17396a3b06ec849a7c0c6fc3243673b17e5fed90 > but would definitely contradict the spirit. Yeah, I definitely agree. Here's what I've done: plugins/Dict/dictclient.py: Submitted a review request for python-dictclient (bug #441098). It seems very old (2002) and I'm not sure how well-maintained it is, but it seems useful for the Supybot plugin (and other uses). plugins/Google/*: I just deleted this plugin entirely. Google doesn't even give SOAP API keys anymore, so this shouldn't be a huge loss. plugins/Math/convertcore.py: I left this one in, since it is a modified module from a GPLed project (as mentioned at the top of the file). I changed the license tag and added a comment to clarify. plugins/RSS/feedparser.py: Deleted. This is provided by python-feedparser. plugins/Time/dateutil/*: Deleted. This is provided by python-dateutil. Once again, I'm not requiring any of those modules because they aren't absolutely necessary for the operation of Supybot. How do you suggest that I document the requirements for certain plugins, though? Should I mention these in some sort of README.fedora or something? Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/Supybot/Supybot.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/Supybot/Supybot-0.83.3-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 06:55:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060655.m366tBjG022543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 ------- Additional Comments From ricky.zhou at gmail.com 2008-04-06 02:55 EST ------- Notes: This should pass rpmlint and build cleanly in mock (F8 and development). This isn't my first package, but I guess I'm still waiting on sponsorship (see bug #436568). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 06:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060657.m366vAig003089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 02:57 EST ------- OK, I have joni building with AOT bits now. URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/joni.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/joni-1.0.2-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 07:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 03:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060715.m367FQaf006082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-06 03:15 EST ------- Well, I just tried to rebuild but it failed (on dist-f9) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=551844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 07:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 03:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060725.m367PxRj007580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 03:25 EST ------- Bummer. I'd guess it's a GCJ problem (since it builds just fine in java-1.6.0-openjdk). New spec and SRPM sans AOT bits: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/joda-time.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/joda-time-1.5.2-5.tzdata2008b.fc8.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=551879 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 07:42:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 03:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804060742.m367gpia029546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-06 03:42 EST ------- Thanks for the patch. I was working on the same solution, but i've also try to remove x86emu (not possible, used even on i386). Patch applied and send upstream. Test on FC5.i386 (my last i386 available OS) : run well. Scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=551901 Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/monitor-edid.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/monitor-edid-1.16-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 10:35:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 06:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226650] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061035.m36AZbr0024461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226650 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-06 06:35 EST ------- It would be nice to have consolekit support in F-9. I am using what I describe above for some moonths now, and I think it would be nice to have it in fedora. I can submit it for inclusion or you can add it in the xdm package, but please move on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 10:46:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 06:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061046.m36AknKh026110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-04-06 06:46 EST ------- Hi, bug 433253 is resolved finally :). So what should be my next steps? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 11:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 07:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061110.m36BA57l029910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-06 07:10 EST ------- Kevin: Is there a guideline about naming fuse modules? I'd prefer sticking with the upstream name, unless there's one. fuse-fusecompres doesn't sound like the name an average user would expect this package to be named. And, right, no fuse in RHEL-5; I did not realize that I got that thingie from atrpms. Please, just create the devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 11:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 07:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061150.m36BoKGM016445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-04-06 07:50 EST ------- I have removed python-setuptools from requires, I copied it from other packaged that needs it. Setup is fixed, and I have added your sed script line to remove the shebang line. The test suite can only be run with pyfits installed. Anyway some of the tests doesn't work (they require numarray to be installed instead of numpy). I have mailed upstream about this last issue. Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pyfits.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/pyfits-1.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 11:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 07:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061154.m36BsPAH016892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-06 07:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > SRPM URL: should be: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice.org-ooolatex-4.0.0-0.beta2.2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 11:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 07:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061151.m36BpTrt016676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-06 07:51 EST ------- reply to comment #3) > FWIW, you could probably use > echo yes | unopkg add --shared --link %{ooolatexext} || : > instead of patching out the "do you agree to GPL" foo to reduce the patch. > > Maybe it'd be worth just unpacking it and applying the patch in %prep and doing > a standard copy of that tree in %install rather than unpacking %{SOURCE0} in > %install. Just to try and look as "normal" as possible. Good idea, updated: * Sun Apr 6 2008 Alex Lancaster - 4.0.0-0.beta2.2 - Requires -draw component to work and -writer or -impress to be useful. - Apply patch and install in more conventional way. - Supply "yes" to license script to avoid needing to patch description.xml Spec URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice.org-ooolatex.spec SRPM URL: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice.org-ooolatex-4.0.0-0.beta2.2.fc8.src.rpm(In -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 15:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441126] New: pkcon failure in non-gui mode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441126 Summary: pkcon failure in non-gui mode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: pkcon fails when run in a different VT or run level 3 showing that dbus is not started which is a bogus error message since dbus is running just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 15:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441126] pkcon failure in non-gui mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061543.m36FhbYA008908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pkcon failure in non-gui mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441126 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |PackageKit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061605.m36G5F1F025866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-04-06 12:05 EST ------- In fact, i'm in the Screenlets Group on gnome-art... and I do package for Fedora. "Whise" forget me to say that 0.1 is out. I'm going to reackage and I'll give you my new SRPM. For the tar.gz: I always need to recreate archive to use it with my specfile. maybe I'll find prettier solution. Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:18:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061618.m36GITKo027869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-06 12:18 EST ------- Well, would you upload your latest srpm? Note: please make it sure that you change the release number of srpm every time you change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:26:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061626.m36GQM70015803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-04-06 12:26 EST ------- Thanks Peter -- I'll hopefully make the suggested adjustments sometime today. I haven't looked at Miranda IM before, but I'm open to including anything interesting. Do they base off of 0.7.5 as well? I've actually gotten commit access to upstream and am encouraging them to do a 0.7.6 release as a result of the April 2nd protocol bump. libyahoo 0.7.5 is useless for connecting without this fix which I'm happy to include as a patch, but would prefer to use upstream's sources if possible of course. Maybe I'll just use SVN source here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061636.m36Ga6JK030840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-06 12:36 EST ------- So we must push in to Livna/RPMFusion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061646.m36GkpiP032308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-04-06 12:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm This is the last and stable release of screenlets I didn't find the way into specfile to specify that the uncompressed folder is not named "screenlets-0.1" but "screenlets", so i did tarball my self. Have fun :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:51:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061651.m36Gpops000618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-06 12:51 EST ------- use %setup -q -n screenlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061657.m36GvSPi001394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-06 12:57 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (joda-time) is APPROVED by me (again) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 16:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061659.m36GxsnY001551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-04-06 12:59 EST ------- One strange issue I am trying to clear up -- this also explains why I was doing: iconv -c -t UTF8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.utf8 || : For some reason, iconv returns false on the above command (without the || :). Initially I assumed this was because the file was already in UTF8 format, but it's not -- rpmlint complains if I don't convert it. rpmbuild stops however with a non-zero return code from any function. --verbose wasn't helpful either, so I'll probably do a gdb on the process, but may just return to forcing a successful return code so that rpmbuild continues and rpmlint won't complain about the non-UTF8 file. Give it a try if you like -- just run iconv on the AUTHORS file by hand and echo $? afterwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 17:08:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441126] pkcon failure in non-gui mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061708.m36H84Ha022193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: pkcon failure in non-gui mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441126 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 17:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061749.m36HnfOS028263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-06 13:49 EST ------- Well, okay (now I have to rewrite _my_ java related packages :) ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (joni) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 18:24:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061824.m36IOx4n015311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-04-06 14:24 EST ------- I was going to package this myself[1], there is some discussion on splitting this up into optional requirements[2]. What would need to be packaged in order to satisfy all optional components of this package? [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ChristopherStone#head-d7744c4c8ee8b851590aa038b984494254d0fda4 [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP#head-d17f63e05f4104fca50f0862125e4cf8490591bf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 18:30:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061830.m36IUi7L016521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-06 14:30 EST ------- Milos, This isn't really the best place to report bugs in preupgrade, since this ticket will quickly become impossible to follow and issues wouldn't be able to be tracked individually. My recommendation would be to go to the upstream web site and file tickets in their track instance. https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 18:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061855.m36ItYXB020307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |441141 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-06 14:55 EST ------- Antlr3 is now pending review, adding as a dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 18:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] New: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cdn.verbum.org/antlr3.spec SRPM URL: http://cdn.verbum.org/antlr3-3.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm %description ANother Tool for Language Recognition, is a language tool that provides a framework for constructing recognizers, interpreters, compilers, and translators from grammatical descriptions containing actions in a variety of target languages. Note for review: This package is called antlr3 (and the jar installed thus) because it's API/ABI incompatible with the RPM "antlr" (ANTLR v2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061900.m36J0EOF021033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 15:00 EST ------- I'm not actually sure jruby depends on antlr3. It builds / runs scripts just fine here without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 18:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061855.m36ItaYZ020334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |417511 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436036] Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061902.m36J20pq007508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061902.m36J21Xs007532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 Bug 417511 depends on bug 436036, which changed state. Bug 436036 Summary: Review Request: jna - Pure Java access to native libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436036 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:10:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061910.m36JAQOg022892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-06 15:10 EST ------- I think Ruby 1.9 is using native threads, so presumably the MRI stdlib will need to become threadsafe as well. Long term, the best thing would be to have one shared stdlib; you could imagine modules which are the same on both just being /usr/lib/ruby/foo.rb, but the VM-specific ones be /usr/lib/jruby/foo.rb, /usr/lib/mi-ruby/foo.rb. How about in the short term, get the JRuby people to modify their package loader to first look in /usr/lib/jruby, and then fall back to the normal /usr/lib/ruby? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061910.m36JA9Ro009175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-06 15:10 EST ------- Well, you could always Provides: fusecompress, but in any case there isn't any guideline on fuse names that I know of. One other fuse package doesn't use the 'fuse-' prefix either. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:12:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061912.m36JCKqQ023150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-06 15:12 EST ------- Approved. There's no need to %ifarch the removal of lrmi.h and lrmi.c though, you can do that for all arches for clarity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061918.m36JIV9u010251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 15:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: joni Short Description: Java regular expression library Owners: konradm Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:23:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061923.m36JN0Re011140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|417511 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061922.m36JMwYb011115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|441141 | ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-06 15:22 EST ------- Yeah, it looks like trunk doesn't have the antlr3 dep anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061923.m36JNVdF024899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-06 15:23 EST ------- For me using such prefixes looks very ugly solution. Instead of extending list of available groups in /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.4.2.2/GROUPS we add stupid fuse- erlang- python- and other prefixes. Another one restriction is that we use only one group instead of list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061920.m36JKqlC024551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 15:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: joda-time Short Description: Java date and time API Owners: konradm Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:30:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440010] Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061930.m36JU6os026191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface to the devilspie window matching daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440010 sindrepb at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 19:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 15:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804061936.m36Ja4Cf027215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 15:36 EST ------- I think a shared stdlib is the way to go as well. For now I am just using /usr/lib/ruby/ for JRuby, though you're welcome to try and patch it to look in /usr/lib/jruby. In my attempt to try to do so I found that libdir, archdir, sitelibdir and sitearchdir as part of Config::CONFIG are defined in src/org/jruby/libraries/RbConfigLibrary.java, but unfortunately changing those did not affect the load library PATH. As far as separation between the two in /usr/lib/ruby goes: JRuby already looks in /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/java as part of its default LOAD_PATH (but it's not anywhere near the first directory checked). Ruby 1.9 is using native threads, but they have a giant lock that lets them get away with much of this (or so says the main JRuby dev -- see http://headius.blogspot.com/2008/04/shared-data-considered-harmful.html). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062007.m36K7HTw018799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-06 16:07 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: monitor-edid Short Description: Tool for probing and parsing EDID Owners: remi Branches: F-7, F-8, EL-5, EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062018.m36KIA80001666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:17:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062017.m36KHhuj001602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-06 16:17 EST ------- Taking this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:23:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062023.m36KN5es021468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062027.m36KRUWu022210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-06 16:27 EST ------- I think upstream should make the call on this; if we (Fedora) pick something on our own it will increase the likelihood that another OS (OpenSolaris,Debian,etc.) pick another value and things get confused as other software vendors won't know where to install their libraries, etc. It sounds like they want to use a separate prefix; can we install all of their libraries into /usr/lib/jruby, and get upstream to add that to the default search path? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062037.m36KbU8Z023878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 16:37 EST ------- They would be fine with us putting their libraries in /usr/lib/jruby and submitting a patch to look there first, but AFAICS they weren't going to write it themselves. I looked a little bit into where these changes would need to be made and RbConfigLibrary.java is one of those places, but there are others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 20:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062037.m36KbcrG004880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 ------- Additional Comments From aaronh at garden.org 2008-04-06 16:37 EST ------- Manuel, thanks again for my sponsorship and for reviewing this package. I'm not part of the GNU Enterprise project, but your work will likely be seen as a gracious contribution to the GNU Enterprise project. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnue-common Short Description: GNU Enterprise Common Base Owners: ashawley Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 21:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441098] Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062144.m36LiKa6014914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-dictclient - Python client for DICT protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441098 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 21:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062159.m36Lx1ST017174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-04-06 17:59 EST ------- The release 0.8 package is uploaded (I hope that this attempt will be the right) : Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended-0.8-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 22:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062231.m36MVnSm022655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ed at eh3.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 22:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062240.m36MeEcl023896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-04-06 18:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301443) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301443&action=view) add BRs for mock and some path cleanups for x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 23:00:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062300.m36N0l3m013391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-04-06 19:00 EST ------- Hi Claudio, I haven't sponsored anyone in a while so I'll have to re-read the guidelines. In the mean time, I've attached a patch that fixes some problems for the octaviz build in mock for F8-x86_64. Please put together a new revision and confirm. Also, we need to verify that octaviz builds in mock for devel (F9) and can do that next. Before sponsoring you I'd like to ask that you please do a "pre-review" for at least one new package submission as described at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored So could you please pick one from the "new" list at the bottom of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess and point me towards your comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 23:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] New: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/fedorainfinity-backgrounds.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/fedorainfinity-backgrounds-0.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains desktop backgrounds for the Fedora Infinity theme, which was the default theme for Fedora 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 6 23:35:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804062335.m36NZHBb018839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-06 19:35 EST ------- OK, I copied to http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 00:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070014.m370EKeu024714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 bradbell at seanet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-04-06 20:14 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cppad New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 00:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070053.m370rXHt011837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-04-06 20:53 EST ------- With the patch in comment #2 the mock F8-x86_64 build fails with the error messages: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/octaviz-0.4.7-3.fc8-root-mockbuild error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/libexec/octave/3.0.0/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/octaviz/vtk3DSImporter.oct /usr/libexec/octave/3.0.0/site/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/octaviz/vtk3DWidget.oct so it looks like the specfile needs to be edited so that: %{_libexecdir}/octave/3.0.0/site/oct/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/octaviz becomes: %{_libexecdir}/octave/3.0.0/site/oct/%{_arch}-redhat-linux-gnu/octaviz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 00:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070054.m370sWF8030708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-06 20:54 EST ------- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jruby.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jruby-1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Just added a few missing Requires and some extra jars that needed to be in CLASSPATH for the /usr/bin/jruby script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:31:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] New: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: axel.thimm at atrpms.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/freenx-client.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/freenx-client-0.9-6.src.rpm Description: NX is an exciting new technology for remote display. It provides near local speed application responsiveness over high latency, low bandwidth links. The core libraries for NX are provided by NoMachine under the GPL. FreeNX is a GPL implementation of the NX Server. freenx is part of Fedora, but upstream now ships freenx-server and freenx-client, see bug #438660. freenx-server is obsoleting/providing freenx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070333.m373XeNZ005280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |438660 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] New: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: axel.thimm at atrpms.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/freenx-server.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/freenx-server-0.7.2-6.src.rpm Description: NX is an exciting new technology for remote display. It provides near local speed application responsiveness over high latency, low bandwidth links. The core libraries for NX are provided by NoMachine under the GPL. FreeNX-server is a GPL implementation of the NX Server. freenx is part of Fedora, but upstream now ships freenx-server and freenx-client, see bug #438660. freenx-server is obsoleting/providing freenx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070333.m373XedW023987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |438660 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-06 23:33 EST ------- I already see I forgot to adjust the description. :/ But please give a review anyway, so I can fix it all in one sweep. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070350.m373o2ba007940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-06 23:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070347.m373l5Rg007567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-06 23:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:51:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070351.m373pfoN027144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-06 23:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 03:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070359.m373xflK009392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-06 23:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 05:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437691] Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070513.m375Dt7d023016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monitor-edid - Tool for probing and parsing EDID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437691 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 06:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070645.m376jl2P022418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-04-07 02:45 EST ------- Many packages don't have bcond macro. It's only eye candy for spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 07:40:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 03:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070740.m377eVCa014902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 swhiteho at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |429769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 08:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 04:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 169971] Review Request: libqalculate - Multi-purpose calculator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070814.m378EduJ022157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libqalculate - Multi-purpose calculator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169971 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide gmuelas at de.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |393721 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 08:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 04:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070859.m378xD9F030630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-07 04:59 EST ------- In a few days ... I'm going to be very busy this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 09:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070901.m3791C8w031413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From paultcochrane at gmail.com 2008-04-07 05:01 EST ------- Hi Patrice, sorry for the long delay in replying to your most recent message, I've only just now got the tuits to work on xmds again. The current version of xmds is 1.6.5 and I've merged many of your comments into the xmds trunk in order to reduce the packaging overhead (it's still not perfect though...). (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > I've added the pdf docs (which is all that gets released now; we used to release > > the LaTeX sources as well... Maybe it'd be better to merge the two back > > together again). > > What is the license of the pdf? The license of the pdf is the same as the software itself: GPL, however, in the rpms I'm linking to now, the pdf isn't included as it wasn't that easy to add the pdf to the rpm easily *and* have the other documentation installed via the Makefiles etc. (the directory got removed and newly created, hence all the files which had been installed were lost, and only the pdf remained). How would an xmds-doc package be as a replacement? One could then have the source rpms for the tex files etc if anyone's keen. We've also updated the naming scheme of xmds, so the current version doesn't have '-' in it anymore :-) The library and header placement has also been improved since the last version you would have seen, so I hope the rpms meet the requirements and that xmds can soon become a part of Fedora. The rpms are: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds-1.6.5.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/xmds/xmds-1.6.5.src.rpm The spec file has the version in it to keep the sourceforge site happy, this is *not* how it appears in the xmds repository. Thanks, as always, for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 09:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804070938.m379c2YH023133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2008-04-07 05:38 EST ------- OK. Fixed the source URL and added a less intrusive example. * Sat Apr 07 2008 - 0.7.5-5 - Modified example. (+Required files) - Missing REQ: xterm. - Fix source URL. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk-0.7.5-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 11:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 07:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071119.m37BJBvC024355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-07 07:19 EST ------- Thanks Peter, thanks Kevin. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 12:26:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071226.m37CQOwi005492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From dhollis at davehollis.com 2008-04-07 08:26 EST ------- I think the sub-packages would just include the specific container files and appropriate Requires: lines... For example, a php-pear-Auth-LDAP might have these specific bits: Requires: php-ldap %files /usr/share/pear/Auth/Container/LDAP.php (appropriate macros used of course) I'm not certain if it's terribly necessary to split up however, though it would likely be the only way to be able to ensure that a particular component would have the right bits installed without the main package requiring everything under the sun... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 13:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071308.m37D8A7e029281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-04-07 09:08 EST ------- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint fedorainfinity-backgrounds-0.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm fedorainfinity-backgrounds.src: W: no-%build-section Fine to ignore, nothing to build. $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/packages/RPMS/noarch/fedorainfinity-backgrounds-0.0.4-1.fc8.noarch.rpm fedorainfinity-backgrounds.noarch: W: no-documentation Might a good idea to include a link to the "upstream" website. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Would be better if the upstream tarball included a COPYING file. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK, although "which was the default theme for Fedora 8." Just saying "the default theme for Fedora 8". - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK, Matthias is upstream - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. It owns %{datadir}/backgrounds, which is already owned by desktop-backgrounds-basic. Don't think that's a problem. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Review is fine, once a COPYING file is added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 13:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071318.m37DIJQ4016426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 ------- Additional Comments From christian.iseli at licr.org 2008-04-07 09:18 EST ------- No progress... (gee, time flies...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 14:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071406.m37E6prK009734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-04-07 10:06 EST ------- Hi, The latest srpm is at : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-4.fc7.src.rpm The spec file is at : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec I had written an explanation for selective make installs in this spec file before... Here it is again : I ve made updates to fix the issues you described. speech-dispatcher-0.6.6 installs the python packages into /usr/lib/ by default unless I dont mention the prefix explicitly in ./configure Since you advised me to avoid that, I have installed python modules directly using the setuptools file provided. Also to prevent make install from breaking when it tries to install python packages to /usr/lib I have written separate make install for all the src directories which must be installed. I am not sure if this is advisable, but could not figure out a better approach. dotconf package request has been made, and I hope that it will be resolved soon. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 15:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071525.m37FPEnX013811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 ------- Additional Comments From jesusr at redhat.com 2008-04-07 11:25 EST ------- I am jmrodri one of the two co-maintainers listed on the page from comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 15:23:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071523.m37FN6Qr013242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2008-04-07 11:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fsvs Short Description: Fast System VerSioning versioning for file trees using subversion Owners: davidf Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 15:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071524.m37FOJAH028166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 jesusr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From jesusr at redhat.com 2008-04-07 11:24 EST ------- I was trying to take over this package but I didn't have the right credentials to take ownership of it. I was told to resubmit it for review to beat the deadline. I would be happy to take the package for fedora 7 and 8 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 15:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071549.m37FnVf9018110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-07 11:49 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://dwalluck.fedorapeople.org/tomcat6/tomcat6-6.0.16-1jpp.7.fc9.src.rpm More on the changes: The initscript should be fixed to only call pgrep if the PID file doesn't exist. If the PID file exists, the built-in status function can be used. I have moved d%{name} to %{name} and created a symlink for d%{name}. In the tomcat5 package, the scripts are different files, and %{name} launches d%{name} with the tomcat user. Note that these scripts are in %{_sbindir} which should be more correct according to FHS, whereas the tomcat5 package has them in %{_bindir). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 15:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071558.m37FwFmY020344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-07 11:58 EST ------- Please see: http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/universalindentgui-0.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 16:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071602.m37G2HLr003676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 12:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 16:01:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438932] Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071601.m37G17Vr021243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438932 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-07 12:01 EST ------- You mean only install example/*.c and not Makefile? I think the original (including Makefile and .deps) is better - at least it has then a working Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 16:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440269] Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071633.m37GXA2E027837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-dsgw - Directory Server Gateway web apps for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-ds-dsgw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440269 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-07 12:33 EST ------- Thanks guys! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 16:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071651.m37GpRsv013954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-04-07 12:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Builds fine. rpmlint says: > preupgrade.src: W: strange-permission preupgrade.spec 0600 > which is a little weird but isn't a blocker. (If it were 666, that would be a > problem.) artifact of rpmbuild -ts file.tar.gz :) > Is there no URL where the source can be downloaded? Where does the tarball come > from? not yet, we've not exactly made an official release, yet. > BuildRoot should be one of the values from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot or at minimum > should include %{release} in addition to what's there. fixed. > You can shorten BuildArchitectures: as BuildArch: if you like to save typing. > (I only mention it because vim highlights it oddly; the 'itectures' is a > different color.) fixed. > > You can remove the tests that ensure the buildroot isn't '/'; rpmbuild does that > for you. fixed. > > I was under the impression that Red Hat-developed code was GPLv2 only. Not > really my business as the License: tag matches the source code, but I figured > I'd ask. that's news to me. Where did you see that? > > I notice you don't use the dist tag. Your choice, of course; I assume you know > how to deal with its absence. we'll add it b/c we will need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 16:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071651.m37GpZER031302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-04-07 12:51 EST ------- Dave, can you access the #fedora-devel channel on the freenode IRC network? I prefer this form of communication for those I sponsor. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate#IRC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 16:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071657.m37GvTFe032169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 17:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071703.m37H3NJM016137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 13:03 EST ------- luaforge.net seems to be down at the moment; I'll wait a bit to see if it comes back up before reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 17:26:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441343] New: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343 Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/guilt-package/guilt.spec SRPM URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/guilt-package/guilt-0.29-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Guilt allows one to use quilt functionality on top of a Git repository. Changes are maintained as patches which are committed into Git. Commits can be removed or reordered, and the underlying patch can be refreshed based on changes made in the working directory. The patch directory can also be placed under revision control, so you can have a separate history of changes made to your patches. F9 koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 17:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071742.m37HgJ74008766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-07 13:42 EST ------- Does not build at least on i386 and x86_64 (dist-f9) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554609 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554614 I have not checked your srpm at all, however: - Why do you disable some configure optional dependency by default? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 18:43:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071843.m37Ihcd4004331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 14:43 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 961913bb82ee6e60d8df6f10e647bda9 freenx-server-0.7.2.tar.gz 961913bb82ee6e60d8df6f10e647bda9 ../rpm/freenx-server-0.7.2/freenx-server-0.7.2.tar.gz OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Why have Release already at 6? This is a version bump from the old one, so I would think it should be able to start again at 1? 2. rpmlint says: freenx-server.src:20: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/backend freenx-server.src:95: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/backend/nxsmb freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver/db 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver/db/closed 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver/db/failed 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver/db/running 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver/home 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/nx 0700 freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /etc/logrotate.d/freenx nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /etc/nxserver/node.conf.sample nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /etc/nxserver nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/db/closed nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/db/failed nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/db nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/db/running nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/home nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh/authorized_keys nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nxserver nx freenx-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/log/nx nx freenx-server.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv freenx-server.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh/authorized_keys /etc/nxserver/server.id_dsa.pub.key freenx-server.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh freenx-server.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh freenx-server.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/nxserver/node.conf.sample freenx-server.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/freenx-server-0.7.2/nxsetup freenx-server.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /var/lib/nxserver/home/.ssh/authorized_keys /etc/nxserver/server.id_dsa.pub.key All these can be ignored I think. freenx-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/freenx perhaps re-name the logrotate file to 'freenx-server' ? Both of those issues are pretty minor, so if you could address them before you import, that would be great. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 18:56:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071856.m37IuDK5024298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 14:56 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 777b3cda7a245e3870d4870a9460cb73 freenx-client-0.9.tar.bz2 777b3cda7a245e3870d4870a9460cb73 freenx-client-0.9.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install See below - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. See below - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun See below - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig See below - .so files in -devel subpackage. See below - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} See below - .la files are removed. See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Fix the description. ;) 2. The License seems to be GPLv2+ here. All the code I can see has the 'or later' in it. Can you confirm and adjust the License tag? Also, you might ping upstream to include a copy of the GPL and ship it once they do? 3. Minor/nitpick: Can this package (and now that I think of it, the server as well) use %{?_smp_mflags}? 4. Might split off those devel files to a devel subpackage? Or if there isn't much point now, perhaps remove them for now? 5. Might consider making a desktop file for the clients? 6. rpmlint says: freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/nxcl/nxclientlib.h freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/nxcl/notQt.h freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/nxcl/nxdata.h freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/nxcl.pc freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/nxcl/nxclientlib_i18n.h freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/nxcl/nxsession.h freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libnxcl.so freenx-client.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/nxcl/nxcl.h freenx-client.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libnxcl.so.1.0.0 freenx-client.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libnxcl.so.1.0.0 All would be fixed by nuking the devel files or shipping them in a devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 19:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071908.m37J8T7k026769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-04-07 15:08 EST ------- okay so: 1. added the source path and url 2. put up a new src.rpm and spec file at: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/preupgrade/ let me know if this passes muster. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 19:32:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071932.m37JWL0H031876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 pcheung at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com 2008-04-07 15:32 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 19:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226480] Merge Review: tclx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804071934.m37JYIOA014477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tclx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-07 15:34 EST ------- All the packages I have reviewed have the bcond macro now. It is not only eye-candy. The use of such conditional is much simpler than one that needs a define. I can do the patch if you want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 19:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] New: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping-2.3.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: SmokePing is a latency logging and graphing system. It consists of a daemon process which organizes the latency measurements and a CGI which presents the graphs. Note rrdtool is currently broken in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441359 making testing there somewhat difficult, however fc8 works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:11:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072011.m37KBrJf009582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 ncorrare at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: smokeping - |Review Request: smokeping - |Latency Logging and Graphing|Latency Logging and Graphing |System |System ------- Additional Comments From ncorrare at redhat.com 2008-04-07 16:11 EST ------- rpmlint says smokeping.src: E: unknown-key GPG#7666df64 Otherwise is ok on F8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072014.m37KEY8j026295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-07 16:14 EST ------- Kevin, worked with Lubomir on last details. I see no other issues (except the distag, Lubomir is fixing it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072017.m37KHUAK010792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-07 16:17 EST ------- Doing a complete re-review since it has been a while... OK - MUST: rpmlint is silent on all packages OK - MUST: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: Spec file name matches base package %{name} OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package is licensed BSD and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: License from source is included in %doc. OK - MUST: Spec is written in American English. OK - MUST: Spec file is legible. OK - MUST: Sources matches upstream by md5 beb48c97815c7b085e3b3d601297fbb8 OK - MUST: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: no known exclude archs OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires OK - MUST: Package is not relocatable OK - MUST: Package owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicates in %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, valid %defattr OK - MUST: Valid %clean section present OK - MUST: Use of macros is consistent OK - MUST: Package contains code, no content. OK - MUST: No large documentation OK - MUST: docs don't affect the runtime of the app OK - MUST: No static libraries OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK - MUST: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT called at beginning of %install. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock OK - SHOULD: package functions as described (even on x86_64 ;)) Suggestion: Renaming default_lnk.patch to %{name}-%{version-when-patch-was-introduced}-default_lnk.patch will make your life easier. ;) Final question: Why do you remove folder_home.xpm? Anyway, this package finally is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:20:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072020.m37KKDYb027951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-07 16:20 EST ------- > rpmlint says smokeping.src: E: unknown-key GPG#7666df64 Yeah, my build scripts is adding a internal only gpg key. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:29:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072029.m37KTdNf012996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-07 16:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Ok, let's work with this new spec file that you've just posted here -- > from the above comments, what is still applicable to the new spec file? Let's see: * License - Not looked into this. * SourceURL - Fixed * %configure - Fixed * Fedora specific compilation flags - Here Fedora uses optimization level "-O2" by default, which is replaced by the latter level "-O4" and Fedora does not allow this. - Fixed (I believe) * Macros - Fixed * Desktop file - Fixed (partly?) * rpmlint issue - rpmlint clean now spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview-1.8.3-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440353] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072039.m37KdjQC015200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-geode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440353 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 20:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072059.m37KxNmI003659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 dwalluck at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-07 16:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tomcat6 Short Description: Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API Owners: dwalluck Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072119.m37LJYME008230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-07 17:19 EST ------- Yes, according to the mailing list they are restoring backups. Will take a few hours. I'll ping you if it comes back up. Maybe you can finish the review of the other two packages. These should be easy as I already incorporated your suggested changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:36:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438445] Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072136.m37Lan11026851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438445 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:37:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438354] Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072137.m37LbEsU026917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438354 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440676] Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072146.m37Lkc8E013753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072146.m37LkdrA013778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 Bug 440681 depends on bug 440676, which changed state. Bug 440676 Summary: Review Request: lua-filesystem - File System Library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440676 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:50:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072150.m37Lo8Nx029859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 Bug 417511 depends on bug 435598, which changed state. Bug 435598 Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:50:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072150.m37Lo9mq029892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 Bug 433497 depends on bug 435598, which changed state. Bug 435598 Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072150.m37Lo7At029819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436239] Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072150.m37LoSi0014647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072150.m37LoT5C014677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 Bug 417511 depends on bug 436239, which changed state. Bug 436239 Summary: Review Request: joda-time - Java date and time API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436239 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] New: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bochecha at no-log.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.free.fr/iWoKmtpoj/adonthell.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.free.fr/o4pMN1LvT/adonthell-0.3.4-0.6.fc8.src.rpm (this is a french host server, click on "T?l?charger ce fichier" to download the files) Description: A 2D, graphical, single player role playing game inspired by good old console RPGs from the SNES like Secret of Mana or Chrono Trigger. This package contains the Adonthell engine. You will also need a game package to play Adonthell. For this release, the official package is Waste's Edge. Notes: 1. This is my first package submission :) 2. rpmlint runs fine, except for the adonthell-doc package: $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/adonthell-doc-0.3.4-0.6.fc8.i386.rpm adonthell-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/adonthell-doc-0.3.4/html/classmapsquare__area__coll__graph.map (same thing for a few other files) I am not very familiar with doxygen, so I don't know if those files can be safely removed or not... 3. Something is bugging me: the adonthell-debuginfo package does not depend on the adonthell package. Isn't that a problem? Did I forget something? 4. This is only a game engine, I'll submit a second package for Waste's Edge, which is a game using the Adonthell engine (I'll add a link to the other submission in the comments, might be better if the two were reviewed simultaneously). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 21:57:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072157.m37LvZNE031210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 bochecha at no-log.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072202.m37M2ICt017080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 18:02 EST ------- ok, cvs done. I assume the javadoc scriptlets mentioned in comment #6 will be removed before import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072204.m37M4vAK032615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 18:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:01:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] New: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bochecha at no-log.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dl.free.fr/jLC82iDWw/wastesedge.spec SRPM URL: (this is a french host server, click on "T?l?charger ce fichier" to download the files) Description: As a loyal servant of the elven Lady Silverhair, you arrive at the remote trading post of Waste's Edge, where she is engaged in negotiations with the dwarvish merchant Bjarn Fingolson. But not all is well at Waste's Edge, and soon you are confronted with circumstances that are about to destroy your mistress' high reputation. And you are the only one to avert this ... Notes: 1. This is my first package submission (along with the one in bug 441411). 2. This package depends on adonthell, which I submitted in bug 441411. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:03:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072203.m37M3loL032355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-07 18:03 EST ------- This package is needed for the one I submitted in bug 441415 (as I said in the submission) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:06:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438354] Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072206.m37M6uYW000945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438354 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 18:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438445] Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072209.m37M9qTu018812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438445 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-07 18:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072218.m37MIhYu020475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072224.m37MOjAI021492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 bochecha at no-log.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |8 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-07 18:24 EST ------- Sorry, I forgot the URL for the SRPM. Here it is: http://dl.free.fr/oTkAOMwRF/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 22:30:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437960] Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072230.m37MUBJb004974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-07 18:30 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package:4d506e1a4f7c96ca9048432e376f8410140b9f8f mac-robber-1.00.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072321.m37NLt07030806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 19:21 EST ------- This is looking good. You can get dir of the unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints with another libtool hack: sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool Since you're already hacking up libtool a bit, there's probably no reason not to do that as well (unless it breaks something, I guess). The remaining rpmlint complaints are: ski-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a problem. ski-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on ski The -devel package depends on the -lib package, but not the main package. This also is not a problem. Most packages seem to use "-libs" for the library subpackage, but there are a few who use "-lib" and we don't seem to have any guidelines about it, so that's OK. There's a test suite in the "testsuite" directory; is this something which could be run at build time? Note that there's no need to include the COPYING twice. Just having it in the main package is sufficient, even if it's possible to install the software without installing that package. This isn't a blocker, though. * source files match upstream: 34b2a1b2575d6c8703df8f1f3980f7b668e744c4a03f20ed4ed91d40cf40c076 ski-1.3.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. ? rpmlint has acceptable complaints, but a few are trivially fixed if you care to. * final provides and requires are sane: ski-1.3.2-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm config(ski) = 1.3.2-2.fc9 ski = 1.3.2-2.fc9 = config(ski) = 1.3.2-2.fc9 libICE.so.6()(64bit) libORBit-2.so.0()(64bit) libSM.so.6()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXm.so.2()(64bit) libXp.so.6()(64bit) libXt.so.6()(64bit) libart_lgpl_2.so.2()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-2.so.0()(64bit) libbonobo-activation.so.4()(64bit) libbonoboui-2.so.0()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libelf.so.1()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgnome-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomeui-2.so.0()(64bit) libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libski-1.3.so.2()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) ski-lib = 1.3.2-2.fc9 ski-devel-1.3.2-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm ski-devel = 1.3.2-2.fc9 = /bin/sh libski-1.3.so.2()(64bit) ski-lib = 1.3.2-2.fc9 ski-lib-1.3.2-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm libski-1.3.so.2()(64bit) ski-lib = 1.3.2-2.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig libXm.so.2()(64bit) libXt.so.6()(64bit) libelf.so.1()(64bit) libelf.so.1(ELFUTILS_1.0)(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libski-1.3.so.2()(64bit) ? %check is not present, but there's some sort of test suite included. * Manual testing shows that things work at least partially, although I don't really know how to test this. * shared libraries added; ldconfig is called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files (besides the COPYING file) * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:25:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072325.m37NPsIx031634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 19:25 EST ------- *** Bug 187326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187326] Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072325.m37NPrO8031598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Network latency grapher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187326 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review- | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 19:25 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 441378 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:34:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072334.m37NYRGq015251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072334.m37NYIba032678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072339.m37NdZuP016052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 19:39 EST ------- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 7 23:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804072349.m37NnUEE002743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 19:49 EST ------- Looks good; rpmlint is now silent, the compiler flags look proper and the debuginfo package is complete. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437960] Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080009.m3809ZM9006331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-07 20:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mac-robber Short Description: Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems Owners: kwizart Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:29:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438354] Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080029.m380TfP5009296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438354 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-04-07 20:29 EST ------- Committed and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438433] Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080029.m380TgRe009320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-toscawidgets - Web widget toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438433 Bug 438433 depends on bug 438354, which changed state. Bug 438354 Summary: Review Request: python-decorator - Module to simplify usage of decorators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438354 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:34:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080034.m380Yx9w010406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |walters at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-07 20:34 EST ------- We had a quick IRC discussion about this and concluded that the current solution of installing the libraries in /usr/lib/jruby and having the "jruby" script installed as /usr/bin/jruby is a good compromise. I'll take this package for the final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 00:41:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 20:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438445] Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080041.m380fnUX026230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cjson - Fast JSON encoder/decoder for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438445 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-04-07 20:41 EST ------- Packages committed and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 01:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080153.m381rSo8005221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 21:53 EST ------- Looks good. rpmlint is silent and the dependencies are down to: pyfits = 1.3-2 = numpy python(abi) = 2.5 Thanks for looking into the test suite. You might consider commenting on it in the specfile, but that's not a big deal. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 02:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080238.m382cLj0000667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-07 22:38 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 89c41db323d6859021cdbc1747b3498c21c9739b /tmp/jruby-src-1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text in tarball but not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires are proper (can't build in mock yet) * %clean is present. ? package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint clean X %check is not present, but there is a test suite upstream * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. X No comment above patches; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PatchUpstreamStatus Java-specific bits: * no pre-built jars * single jar, named after the package * jarfiles are under _javadir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 03:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 23:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080336.m383aAcT025632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-07 23:36 EST ------- Yeah, this looks fine. The buildroot's good, source URL is good, all of the other minor issues are fixed, and it still builds. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 04:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080420.m384KuMc000524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-08 00:20 EST ------- luaforge.net is back up now, so.... rpmlist says: lua-sql.x86_64: E: no-binary This is true, and is not a problem. lua-sql-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation lua-sql-postgresql.x86_64: W: no-documentation lua-sql-sqlite.x86_64: W: no-documentation These are all OK as well; the documentation is in a separate package. The base package containing only the README file is kind of odd. Honestly I don't really see the point of having it at all; I'd just put the README file in the -doc package and dispense with the base package altogether. But I don't really see any problem with it. I note that there's some sort of test suite. Usually database tests can't really be run at build time and I'm going to assume that's the case here, but if if they do happen to be runnable it would be good for you to add a %check section. * source files match upstream: 608c79e84bb9a348ed2a9375a4e7ba4d42615c8b8ef6959c014661ddd9eda765 luasql-2.1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summaries are OK. * descriptions are OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: lua-sql-2.1.1-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm lua-sql = 2.1.1-3.fc9 = lua-sql-doc lua-sql-mysql lua-sql-postgresql lua-sql-sqlite lua-sql-doc-2.1.1-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm lua-sql-doc = 2.1.1-3.fc9 = lua >= 5.1 lua-sql-mysql-2.1.1-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm mysql.so()(64bit) lua-sql-mysql = 2.1.1-3.fc9 = libmysqlclient.so.15()(64bit) libmysqlclient.so.15(libmysqlclient_15)(64bit) lua >= 5.1 lua-sql-postgresql-2.1.1-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm postgres.so()(64bit) lua-sql-postgresql = 2.1.1-3.fc9 = libpq.so.5()(64bit) lua >= 5.1 lua-sql-sqlite-2.1.1-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm sqlite3.so()(64bit) lua-sql-sqlite = 2.1.1-3.fc9 = libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit) lua >= 5.1 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 04:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441343] Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080430.m384UFPH021591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 04:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080431.m384VpVR021720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-08 00:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > ... > X %check is not present, but there is a test suite upstream I'm not sure how this is supposed to look. We'll talk about it tomorrow. > ... > X No comment above patches; see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PatchUpstreamStatus Fixed in 1.1-3 (along with the conflicting ruby/jruby prefixes). URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jruby.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jruby-1.1-3.fc8.src.rpm (I am just uploading the src.rpm now, it may a few minutes as it's huge.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 04:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441343] Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080439.m384dMBR022681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-08 00:39 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 065ba5cd7933eba11fa13dc1af653721d6de6ebc965791a25680d34b9598ee69 guilt-0.29.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: guilt = 0.29-1.fc9 = /bin/sh bash gawk git sed * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 06:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080616.m386GYda020217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-08 02:16 EST ------- Rebuild failed on dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=556181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 06:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080657.m386vUO8014227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-08 02:57 EST ------- Looks like a bug with OpenJDK on PPC, I guess. I'm trying a scratch build using GCJ, we'll see how that goes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 06:58:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080658.m386wZai003291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-08 02:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-posix Short Description: A POSIX library for Lua Owners: timn Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 06:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 02:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080659.m386xwRV003433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-08 02:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-socket Short Description: Network support for the Lua language Owners: timn Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080702.m38720Mo015210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-08 03:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-sql Short Description: Database connectivity for Lua Owners: timn Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:02:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080702.m3872ClY004344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080701.m3871Ufg004167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-08 03:01 EST ------- You are right about the README file. I'll move it to the -doc package and make lua-sql a pure meta package to pull in everything. Thanks for all the thorough reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:35:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080735.m387Z3JA021631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-08 03:35 EST ------- I think GCJ won't build it on any platform because it fails at looking for classes in classpath. (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=556250) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:46:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080746.m387kJEI012392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 anyremote at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(anyremote at mail.ru)| ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-08 03:46 EST ------- Sorry for late responce. I was on vacation. I'm going to re-read updated fedora wiki docs and try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080751.m387p6aL024829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-08 03:51 EST ------- Is anyone interested in making code review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 07:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 03:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080750.m387okRI013351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-08 03:50 EST ------- Is anyone interested in making code review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 08:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080802.m3882lYi016252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-08 04:02 EST ------- I've done "fedora-cvs anyremote" Then as it written at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Anatomy ---------------------- make sources make: *** No rule to make target `sources'. Stop. ---------------------- Umm... Do i need at all to have sources in package directory ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 08:07:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080807.m38870U2017388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-08 04:07 EST ------- Oops, sorry. I have to descend to devel/ before run make sources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 08:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080806.m3886LHr017264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-04-08 04:06 EST ------- Thanks, Jason. Upstream says that they are going to fix one of the tests, but anyway, you need pyfits installed to run them. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyfits Short Description: Python interface to FITS Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 08:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 04:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080832.m388WPbw022530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-08 04:32 EST ------- If we ExcludeArch ppc{,64} it builds fine: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=556292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 09:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435598] Review Request: joni - Java regexp library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080903.m38938t8007394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: joni - Java regexp library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435598 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|433497 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 09:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080903.m38937J8007360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|435598 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 09:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080900.m3890AxV006546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-08 05:00 EST ------- Kevin: sure. done; thank you for CVS. Marek, much thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 09:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 05:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804080900.m3890CMm006578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 Bug 433312 depends on bug 433497, which changed state. Bug 433497 Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 10:08:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438138] Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081008.m38A8Rd1007998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tzdata-java - Time zone data for Java language Alias: tzdata-java-epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438138 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-08 06:08 EST ------- Jason: Thanks, fixed. Imported and built, Thanks Marek, Thanks Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 10:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436817] Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081011.m38ABcaW008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress - FUSE based compressed filesystem implementation Alias: fusecompress-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436817 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 10:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 06:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081032.m38AWsEB012537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-08 06:32 EST ------- Please also rebuild this on F-8. After that, visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and request to push your F-8 packages to the repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 11:03:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 07:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081103.m38B3iBg028891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2008-04-08 07:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Suggestion: Renaming default_lnk.patch to > %{name}-%{version-when-patch-was-introduced}-default_lnk.patch will make your > life easier. ;) Semi-fixed. (I rather not put the version number in the patch - as it doesn't effect the actual code. Spec URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk.spec SRPM URL: http://gilboadavara.thecodergeek.com/idesk-0.7.5-6.fc8.src.rpm > Final question: Why do you remove folder_home.xpm? It was required by the old (xdialog) example. As the example no longer needs it - there's no need to carry it around. > Anyway, this package finally is APPROVED. Thanks again for taking the time to the review. - Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 12:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081257.m38CvviC018418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-08 08:57 EST ------- I think the %check should be as easy as: %check ant test-all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 12:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081255.m38Ctfli018181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2008-04-08 08:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: idesk Short Description: Light desktop manager for minimal WMs Owners: gilboa Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 13:38:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081338.m38DcMGJ016570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-08 09:38 EST ------- The current example is indeed better than the default one, but I would nevertheless suggest shipping folder_home.xpm be it as %doc. I would also suggest shipping the upstream examples/default.lnk in %doc. I also suggest substituting %{_datadir} to have things right even if %{_datadir} is different from /usr/share/, right after patching: sed -e -i 's:/usr/share/idesk/:%{_datadir}/idesk/:' examples/default.lnk And last, I think that it would be nice to have a comment stating where the xterm.png icon comes from. (None of these are blockers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 13:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 09:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081349.m38DnBae018531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 aaronh at garden.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 14:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081404.m38E46SM021940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-08 10:04 EST ------- No, you can't use "Distributable" in the License tag. "Fedora no longer permits packages to use "Distributable" as a valid License." I'm looking into this issue in more depth now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 14:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441343] Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081427.m38ERFb9006572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-04-08 10:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guilt Short Description: Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git Owners: sandeen Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 14:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081453.m38ErMY7000862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-08 10:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #55) Umm... Something going wrong here --------------------------------------- cd anyremote/F-8 make tag rpmq: no arguments given for query rpmq: no arguments given for query --------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 15:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081504.m38F49AG003546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-08 11:04 EST ------- This license is functionally equivalent to MIT. The Licensing page has been updated to list the mpich2 license as "MIT". Please use: License: MIT Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 15:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 11:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081503.m38F3mNO014959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-08 11:03 EST ------- First upload tarball and spec file as same as devel/ directory. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 16:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427530] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081618.m38GIbij021179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427530 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-04-08 12:18 EST ------- awesome 2.2 and 2.3 have been released, but I have not made any packages of those. (At least for the time being,) I have given up using awesome in favour of standard Gnome with awesome-like keybindings: There seems to be no other way to use NetworkManager, the setroubleshoot browser, etc. If anyone wants to take over this package, feel free to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 16:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081623.m38GNGr5002199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-08 12:23 EST ------- fwiw, I've played with this looking for breakage, for only a few minutes here and there. found no show-stoppers, nothing remotely thorough mind you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 16:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081626.m38GQWwS023124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-08 12:26 EST ------- wolfy, if you consider getting yourself working rawhide (to test) to review this a blocker, please remove yourself as reviewer, else, please continue. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 16:49:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081649.m38GnYub028020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-08 12:49 EST ------- FYI: #441359 blocking testing in rawhide is now fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 16:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081651.m38GprH4028891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |assim.deodia at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-04-08 12:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Does not build at least on i386 and x86_64 (dist-f9) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554609 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=554614 > > I have not checked your srpm at all, however: > - Why do you disable some configure optional dependency by default? > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:07:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081707.m38H7TKJ011783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-04-08 13:07 EST ------- Hi, I looked through the BUILD logs and it seems the build broke down because dotconf libraries were not found. *** Required DotConf library missing! See INSTALL . error: I believe the dotconf package is intended for OLPC-2, and hence an error for i386 and x86_64. ummm, I am not quite sure which optional dependencies you are referring to? ibmtts, flite-devel and so on? I included the conditional build options for greater flexibility, and if you will advise me, I will remove them. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081709.m38H9c4P032659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-08 13:09 EST ------- Thanks for the super-fast review!!! > freenx-server.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/freenx > > perhaps re-name the logrotate file to 'freenx-server' ? Yes, I missed that one! I'll fix it before importing. > Why have Release already at 6? This is a version bump from the old one, > so I would think it should be able to start again at 1? I'd like to keep it that way especially because it is the forked revision, so I can see the continuity of the package. But maybe this is overkill for the client package (the other review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:18:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081718.m38HIYxr014095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081718.m38HI6Fj002076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-08 13:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freenx-server Short Description: Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server Owners: athimm Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Jon Ciesla (limb) Cvsextras Commits: no (too many people) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:40:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081740.m38HeMYf006263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-08 13:40 EST ------- - First please try what $ rpm -qp --requires speech-dispatcher-XXXX.src.rpm shows, which is apparently against what you expect. And $ rpm -qip speech-dispatcher-XXXX.src.rpm shows what is happening. You can rewrite your spec file from $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib speech-dispatcher (/usr/bin/rpmdev-newspec is in rpmdevtools rpm), which should prevent from making such mistakes :) Also, please write all %description of subpackages before %prep section, which is the usually way to write spec files. - And perhaps to build this package dotconf header files are also needed. - I am asking why you "disable" "BuildRequires: flite-devel" and so on _by default_. On koji build you cannot pass the option "--with-flite" or so to rpmbuild, it just does "rpm --rebuild ". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081749.m38HnjQF020004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-08 13:49 EST ------- > Review is fine, once a COPYING file is added. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 17:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 13:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081752.m38HqRgV009031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-08 13:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedorainfinity-backgrounds Short Description: Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds Owners: mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437960] Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081800.m38I0p41022912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:03:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081803.m38I3b9i011698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081808.m38I8AjE024712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439310] Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081806.m38I6N16012626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnue-common - GNU Enterprise Common Base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081809.m38I9rsA012953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:09 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:11:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081811.m38IBnnm025642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:13:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081813.m38ID2xG025868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:13 EST ------- I assume you just want a devel branch here? or ? Please use Fedora account system names for Owners. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081814.m38IEvjj014164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441343] Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081818.m38II2M1015192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guilt - Scripts to manage quilt-like patches on top of git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441343 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 14:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081816.m38IGw24014944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-08 14:16 EST ------- Thank you Tom for resolving the license issue. Updated package with the clarified license and latest upstream release is available below, please review. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081851.m38IpZYT001829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-08 14:51 EST ------- devel branch is automatic, no ? I need no others... FAS name might be mclasen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 18:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:49:28 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081849.m38InSJQ001126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-08 14:49 EST ------- > Looks like we just need to get upstream to get the GCC patch included > upstream (not necessary, I guess, just nice) and wait for the licensing > fixes. I believe this is all done upstream now. If you spin a new .spec with this, I'll approve it. BTW, latest upstream CVS has Python and Perl bindings now. Do you intend to add these into sub-packages sometime (after initial approval/checkin/build/push is fine by me)? I can try and help out with the Python bindings at least if you need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 19:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438982] Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081900.m38J0xbs004054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyfits - Python interface to FITS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438982 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 19:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081925.m38JP3FN009329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-08 15:25 EST ------- I've been trying since Sunday to test the rpm, but I've been hit by several bugs. First konqueror would not start, then (twice) I hit https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg00690.html Rex, feel free to review the bug yourself if so you wish. All I can do is to upgrade my F8 for the 4th time and hope for the best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 19:41:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437960] Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081941.m38Jfa9d001498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-08 15:41 EST ------- Thx for the review ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 19:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 401101] Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804081941.m38Jfb8X001518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sleuthkit - The Sleuth Kit (TSK) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=401101 Bug 401101 depends on bug 437960, which changed state. Bug 437960 Summary: Review Request: mac-robber - Tool to create a timeline of file activity for mounted file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437960 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 19:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] New: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: goldschr at cshl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec SRPM URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-6.src.rpm Description: DNX is an event broker module and set of worker daemons for Nagios that transparently distributes service checks among a set of designated worker nodes. The spec contains a main package, "dnx", which contains the worker daemon, and a subpackage, "nagios-dnx", which contains the event broker module. This package is based on the openSUSE package by John Calcote. I have included a patch to disable the unit test that runs the daemon, which fails inside mock. This problem exists in openSUSE's build system as well, and is documented here: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-buildservice/2008-02/msg00198.html As this is my first package submission, I will need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 20:27:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082027.m38KRV4h023696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 ------- Additional Comments From cmadams at hiwaay.net 2008-04-08 16:27 EST ------- I've updated to spec/SRPM to -3 to change the install line (otherwise I'd forget). I have been planning to try to do some reviews but I just haven't had time yet (maybe later this week). There are some other things I will want to submit once I get settled, but time has been an issue there as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 20:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082032.m38KW6jh015114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 16:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 20:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082045.m38Kj8Yv017846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 skvidal at linux.duke.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-04-08 16:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: preupgrade Short Description: Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade Owners: skvidal, wwoods, katzj Branches: F8, devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 20:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082050.m38KoWUV019095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 16:50 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082111.m38LBOPV023610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 goldschr at cshl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082115.m38LFGFo024440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |441114 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] New: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mr.ecik at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/python-mpd/python-mpd.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/python-mpd/python-mpd-0.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: An MPD (Music Player Daemon) client library written in pure Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:15:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082115.m38LFOjk024471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-08 17:15 EST ------- I'll do a pre-review: * source files match upstream: 0e964e9273c606c46afbd311b5ad4d77 3_01.txt 7fc74905125cbfe4af78530e7db92583 HNP-1.1.2.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). ? package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mediawiki-HNP = 1.1.2-1.fc9 = mediawiki >= 1.10 mediawiki-StubManager >= 1.1.0 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I'm not sure how you would go about testing this, anyway. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. ? %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082127.m38LRCSf003688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-08 17:27 EST ------- Heh, you took the checklist out of my mouth. I can fill in: * package installs properly. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. To check the last one, do rpm -qpd mediawiki-HNP-1.1.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm and check that those files aren't actually used by the program. It's generally obvious. I'd approve this, and since I know that the infrastructure folks want this soon, I'll go ahead and do so. I hope that Josh doesn't think I'm stealing his credit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:32:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082132.m38LWZZE004771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-08 17:32 EST ------- Hi Michel. The dependencies have just been approved and you can start reviewing this package and #440681 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:35:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082135.m38LZt8X028633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-08 17:35 EST ------- I don't see you in the account system; is this your first package for Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 21:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082151.m38LpmLp008287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 22:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440678] Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082216.m38MGfQI012730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 22:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082216.m38MGfdL012755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 Bug 440680 depends on bug 440678, which changed state. Bug 440678 Summary: Review Request: lua-socket - Network support for the Lua language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440678 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 22:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440677] Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082216.m38MGroG003595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-posix - A POSIX library for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440677 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 22:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440679] Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082216.m38MGTIq003522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 22:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082216.m38MGUe6003547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 Bug 440680 depends on bug 440679, which changed state. Bug 440679 Summary: Review Request: lua-sql - Database connectivity for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440679 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082310.m38NAXE3021837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-08 19:10 EST ------- I started to do a pre-review but the package wouldn't build as is. You need to start by adding python-devel >= 2.4 to the BuildRequires Doing that produces the following error: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cwiid-0.6.00-py2.5.egg-info Take care of those 2 things and I'll do another pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082311.m38NBQUv012762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-08 19:11 EST ------- Also, you need something under changelog and your package is not rpmlint clean: cwiid.src: E: description-line-too-long Cwiid is a library that enables your application to communicate with a wiimote using a bluetooth connection. cwiid.src: E: no-changelogname-tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082321.m38NLKGQ023588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-08 19:21 EST ------- I tried. Thanks for the tip, I appreciate it. This looks interesting, I'll probably play around with it some. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:24:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082324.m38NOWcs023863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-08 19:24 EST ------- Pre-Reviewed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082327.m38NRY01015301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walters at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-08 19:27 EST ------- Sorry, for some reason I wasn't on the CC list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:40:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082340.m38NetEn026982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-08 19:40 EST ------- Ok, I built the packages by adding %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info to the python2 %files section (I do not know if this is the correct thing to do or not, I don't know what that file is used for) For testing purposes I took care of the easy things for rpmlint (description too long and summary ending in . and no changelog) which produced the following output on the built packages: cwiid.x86_64: W: no-documentation cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/lib64/libcwiid.a cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/include/cwiid.h cwiid-python2.x86_64: W: no-documentation cwiid-python2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cwiid.so 0775 cwiid-wmgui.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized wiimote connectio test application cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/buttons cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/gamepad cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/neverball cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/nunchuk_acc_ptr cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/ir_ptr cwiid-wminput.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/cwiid/wminput/acc_ptr Remaining packaging guidelines: MUST: + rpmlint output see above + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name - package should satisfy packaging guidelines not rpmlint clean + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches actual package license - includes LICENSE file in %doc does not include LICENSE file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm - package successfully builds on at least one architecture Does not build with sources provided. Builds on x86_64 once initial recommendations are met + ExcludeArch bugs filed - BuildRequires list all build dependencies needs python-devel >= 2.4 ? %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel + static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files + packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream + translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + builds in mock + builds on i386 and x86_64 ? review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin Take care of those things and I'll do another pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 8 23:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441164] Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804082355.m38Nt9sn019851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorainfinity-backgrounds - Fedora Infinity desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441164 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-08 19:55 EST ------- Built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 00:00:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090000.m3900Zgq020711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |walters at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-08 20:00 EST ------- I get this error trying to build: DEBUG util.py:250: No Package Found for java-rpmbuild Looking over the spec quickly: * BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6.0 This needs to be >= 1:1.6.0, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java * Source: Should be a fully-qualified URL here. I'll do a full check once we get those things fixed. Taking this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 00:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090006.m39060af021861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-08 20:05 EST ------- Excellent. Thanks. I would be happy to sponsor you... can you continue the process at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 00:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090033.m390Xm9A026217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-08 20:33 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: konq-plugins-4.0.1-icons.patch -> Sebastian ? Should this patch be applied ? binary RPM: konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/uachanger/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/uachanger/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/domtreeviewer/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/domtreeviewer/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/fsview/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/fsview/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/validators/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/validators/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/dirfilter/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/dirfilter/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/babel/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/babel/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/imgallery/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/imgallery/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/webarchiver/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/webarchiver/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/crashes/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/crashes/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/khtmlsettings/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common konq-plugins.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konq-plugins/khtmlsettings/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common -> acceptable for a KDE package [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ and BSD and LGPLv2+ License tag: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package:not available, source is a svn checkout. Running diff on the individual files mostly match. There are however 24 different source and graphic files and 864 different translation files. All differences seem to be due to svn updates. I will rely on Sebastian's judgment over the version to be shipped in Fedora. [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Latest version is packaged. not a problem, the package uses svn version 4.0.2, meanwhile 4.0.3 has been released. As stated above, I rely on Sebastian to pick the best release to be shipped in Fedora. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Not all the plugins are using the same license and they are delivered as separate libraries. Therefore I think that the correct license tag is "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ , "Multiple licensing situations", answer A3) 2. The autorefresh plugin has no license specified. IANAL, but I am almost certain this has to be clarified before including it in Fedora 3. One patch is included in the src.rpm but not applied. Maybe you could either drop it, use it or add a note mentioning why is it included but not used ? ================ *** APPROVED *** but please fix the license tag before commit ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 01:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441610] New: Review Request: Cerealizer - Python module for secure object serialization Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441610 Summary: Review Request: Cerealizer - Python module for secure object serialization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/Cerealizer.spec SRPM URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/Cerealizer-0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Cerealizer is a Python module for object serialization similar to the pickle module. Unlike pickle, it is secure and implemented in just 300 lines of Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 02:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 22:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090254.m392sAQi018960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-04-08 22:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-HNP Short Description: An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 (right?) InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090512.m395CdW9020730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:12 EST ------- cpdup-1.07-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090515.m395FNos011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:15 EST ------- mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090512.m395CfID010461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.07-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:15:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090515.m395FR5s022012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:15 EST ------- cpdup-1.07-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090518.m395IFHB022933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:18 EST ------- latex2emf-1.0.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:16:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090516.m395GI9n022316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:16 EST ------- python-demjson-1.3-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-demjson'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-2942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:18:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439338] Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090518.m395IYHf012791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-StubManager - An extension meant to address 'rare events' handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439338 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:18 EST ------- mediawiki-StubManager-1.2.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:18:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090518.m395IgJf012870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:18 EST ------- python-textile-2.0.11-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-textile'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438102] Review Request: ocaml-facile - OCaml library for constraint programming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090522.m395M8Om024986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-facile - OCaml library for constraint programming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438102 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:22 EST ------- ocaml-facile-1.1-2.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090521.m395LvqA024944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:21 EST ------- latex2emf-1.0.0-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090522.m395M0XE014749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-09 01:22 EST ------- javasqlite-20080401-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 05:22:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439941] Review Request: javasqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090522.m395M2gn014784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javasqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439941 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |20080401-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090600.m3960OFP021416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-09 02:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #57) > First upload tarball and spec file as same as devel/ directory. I did: ./common/cvs-import.sh -b FC-8 /path/to/anyremote-4.4-1.fc8.src.rpm but nothing changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:01:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090601.m3961kj8031915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-09 02:01 EST ------- Sorry, typo. I did: ./common/cvs-import.sh -b F-8 /path/to/anyremote-4.4-1.fc8.src.rpm but nothing changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090604.m3964VjH032303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-09 02:04 EST ------- Finally, seems it works. I had to do "cvs co" before "make tag" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090608.m3968fKH000572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-09 02:08 EST ------- A few comments: Please use a capital M for the English name Malayalam in the spec file in various places: ie s/malayalam/Malayalam/ where it makes sense. %fontdir should just be %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}. %defattr(-,root,root,-) should come right after %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:18:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090618.m396IPmo002312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-09 02:18 EST ------- Okay, then please visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and request F-8 anyremote package to push. For new packages the "Type" is "enhancement". If you want to push your package to fedora updates repository directory (i.e. you want to skip to push your package to "testing" repositofy), change "Request" to "stable". After you request to push on bodhi, please close this bug as "NEXTRELEASE". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:19:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090619.m396JuwA024529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-09 02:19 EST ------- s/directory/directly/ ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 06:35:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090635.m396ZBui027379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 08:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 04:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090828.m398S63C014002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 04:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > [x] Rpmlint output: > source RPM: > W: patch-not-applied Patch2: konq-plugins-4.0.1-icons.patch > -> Sebastian ? Should this patch be applied ? No, it's not needed anymore. I'll remove it. > [!] Latest version is packaged. > not a problem, the package uses svn version 4.0.2, meanwhile 4.0.3 has been > released. As stated above, I rely on Sebastian to pick the best release to be > shipped in Fedora. konq-plugins did not get changes for a long time. The script create_tarball.rb use the actual verstion of KDE also for the created tarball. At time of creation this was 4.0.2. However, there were some changes in the past days. So I could a) update the package and submit the new version for review again b) import the package and update it after the import > 1. Not all the plugins are using the same license and they are delivered as > separate libraries. Therefore I think that the correct license tag is "GPLv2+ > and LGPLv2+" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ , "Multiple licensing > situations", answer A3) Ok. I'll use "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" then. > 2. The autorefresh plugin has no license specified. IANAL, but I am almost > certain this has to be clarified before including it in Fedora I'll try to ping upstream to include a license in autorefresh.* files then. But what to to until then? Import it and wait for upstream or wait with the import until upstream has fixed this? > 3. One patch is included in the src.rpm but not applied. Maybe you could either > drop it, use it or add a note mentioning why is it included but not used ? See above. I'll drop it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 08:30:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 04:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090830.m398UiK0014601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 swhiteho at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |441634 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 08:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 04:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090837.m398bPmw026615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 04:37 EST ------- Just assume it's GPL, KDE has a global licensing policy for a reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 08:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 04:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090836.m398aQE9015685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 swhiteho at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |441636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:02:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] New: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: than at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/wave-kdm-theme/wave-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/wave-kdm-theme/wave-kdm-theme-1.0.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the Fedora Wave KDM theme that is the default theme in Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090901.m3991ELk020099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-09 05:01 EST ------- > At time of creation this was 4.0.2. I've compared the included tar with svn version 4.0.2, as pulled by the create_tarball.rb script. The differences I have mentioned are between these two file version. >However, there were some changes in the past days. Yup, they switched to 4.0.3 > So I could >a) update the package and submit the new version for review again no need to re-review, the differences are in the source code, not in the package itself >b) import the package and update it after the import feel free to update whenever you seem fit. I for one would import directly the new version, but it's your choice Re #12: Kevin, could you please point me to the docs which simplify our life and justify overriding http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ in the case of KDE ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090917.m399HEC0001257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:16:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090916.m399GCjZ001158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary| Review Request: wave-kdm- |Review Request: wave-kdm- |theme |theme ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-09 05:16 EST ------- http://than.fedorapeople.org/wave-kdm-theme/wave-kdm-theme-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090916.m399GmTG022836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090916.m399GvUW022872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090928.m399S26F003103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > ================ > *** APPROVED *** but please fix the license tag before commit > ================ Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: konq-plugins Short Description: Additional plugins that interact with konqueror Owners: svahl,than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090926.m399QB1W002912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 05:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Just assume it's GPL, KDE has a global licensing policy for a reason. Ok. Thx. (In reply to comment #13) > no need to re-review, the differences are in the source code, not in the package itself Ok. I'll do the changes after the import then. > >b) import the package and update it after the import > feel free to update whenever you seem fit. I for one would import directly the > new version, but it's your choice In my reading of the packaging guidelines I'm only allowed to import the _approved_ SRPM (here 4.0.2-0.2-20080303svn). But when I do the changes is not important, so I'll do it after the import. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 09:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 05:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804090926.m399QZqx002976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-09 05:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > This is looking good. > > You can get dir of the unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints with another libtool hack: > sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool > Since you're already hacking up libtool a bit, there's probably no reason not to do that as well (unless it breaks something, I guess). > Thanks for the libtool trick, it is included and nothing looks broken. > The remaining rpmlint complaints are: > > ski-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > Not a problem. > > ski-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on ski > The -devel package depends on the -lib package, but not the main package. This also is not a problem. > > Most packages seem to use "-libs" for the library subpackage, but there are a > few who use "-lib" and we don't seem to have any guidelines about it, so > that's OK. > Oh, I surely wanted to use -libs ;-) > There's a test suite in the "testsuite" directory; is this something which > could be run at build time? It doesn't look like it is easily runnable and even it doesn't test something much useful. > > Note that there's no need to include the COPYING twice. Just having it in the > main package is sufficient, even if it's possible to install the software > without installing that package. This isn't a blocker, though. I would like to include both of them. * Wed Apr 9 2008 Dan Horak 1.3.2-3 - fix linking issues - use -libs for the subpackage Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski-1.3.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 10:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 06:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091003.m39A3rqQ009238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 06:03 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301768) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301768&action=view) Screenshot with different users in 1280x1024 1. Shouldn't it be "waves" instead of "wave"? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9Themes/Waves 2. For infinity and flyinghigh we've used the prefix "fedora": fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme and fedorainfinity-kdm-theme So I would suggest "fedorawaves-kdm-theme" as name. 3. Please have a look at the screenshot. It'll need some work: - hostname is bigger than the box - font color needs some changes for not selected users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 10:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 06:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091023.m39ANUdC002087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol Alias: stun-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-09 06:23 EST ------- Hi Marek, Thanks for the reveiw, here are the improved files: SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/stun.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/stun-0.96-2.fc8.src.rpm Koji Builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=559189 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=559194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091103.m39B3x6E019657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 07:03 EST ------- Here's the evidence that the plugin is GPL: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/base/konq-plugins/autorefresh/autorefresh.desktop?revision=748952&view=markup It says: X-KDE-PluginInfo-License=GPL The version isn't specified, but this isn't a blocker. And more generally speaking: The FAQ you pointed to says: 4. If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll guess COPYING is accurate. Now, keep in mind that most upstreams are probably leaving the versioning out by accident. If you get to case 4, you definitely want to let upstream know that you are unable to determine the applicable version(s) of the license from the source and documentation. They'll almost certainly let you know what their intended license version is, and (hopefully) correct it in the upstream source. The problem of missing license headers in some files is unfortunately fairly common, not only in KDE. I don't think we have any reason to consider this anything other than an accident, considering KDE's licensing policy. http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy (Note: There are older revisions which didn't require GPLv3 compatibility, but they all required licenses which are acceptable for Fedora.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:11:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091111.m39BBqGQ021379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 07:11 EST ------- Sebastian, what color scheme are you using? The author says you should use ObsidianBlue. For the "hostname is bigger than the box" problem, we should just make the box wider, there's plenty of room. I'll do the review when I get back home. The name should be waves-kdm-theme or fedorawaves-kdm-theme. I'm not sure about the "fedora" part because the theme doesn't actually contain a Fedora logo, but on the other hand it makes it clear where the theme is coming from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:34:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441610] Review Request: Cerealizer - Python module for secure object serialization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091134.m39BYAc6015179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cerealizer - Python module for secure object serialization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441610 dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com 2008-04-09 07:34 EST ------- Closing, just realized this has been packaged since I *thought* I searched and couldn't find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091135.m39BZJwa015633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-09 07:35 EST ------- 1. Shouldn't it be "waves" instead of "wave"? >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9Themes/Waves it's typo, it should be waves. >2. For infinity and flyinghigh we've used the prefix "fedora": >fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme and fedorainfinity-kdm-theme i will rename it to fedorawaves-kdm-theme. >3. Please have a look at the screenshot. It'll need some work: > - hostname is bigger than the box it's knowned issue. I already talked with Pavel, he will fix it properly today evening. Temporary i will make the box wider. > - font color needs some changes for not selected users ObsidianCoast works fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091130.m39BUx5G014863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 07:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Sebastian, what color scheme are you using? The author says you should use > ObsidianBlue. Oxygen (the default in current kdmrc). Where do I get ObsidianBlue? kdebase-workspace only contains ObsidianCoast ATM. > The name should be waves-kdm-theme or fedorawaves-kdm-theme. I'm not sure > about the "fedora" part because the theme doesn't actually contain a Fedora > logo, but on the other hand it makes it clear where the theme is coming from. AFAIR also fedorainfinity-kdm-theme and fedoraflyinghigh-kdm-theme didn't contain a Fedora logo. So I would prefer fedorawaves-kdm-theme as %name (and /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/themes/FedoraWaves as directory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: wave-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091141.m39BfJn7016763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wave-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 07:41 EST ------- ObsidianCoast must be what I meant, that was from memory and I just didn't remember it correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091143.m39BhVgC017036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: wave-kdm- |Review Request: fedorawaves- |theme |kdm-theme ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 07:43 EST ------- I'm changing the title for the fixed name, please rename the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091145.m39BjQMP027679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-09 07:45 EST ------- Excellent, this clarifies the license of autorefresh. Thanks, Kevin ! PS: I had the impression that in comment #12 you were speaking about the license tag of the RPM, not about this particular plugin. It's all clear now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 11:48:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091148.m39BmD7F018081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 07:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=301783) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=301783&action=view) Screenshot with ColorScheme=ObsidianCoast in 1280x1024 (In reply to comment #6) > ObsidianCoast must be what I meant, that was from memory and I just didn't > remember it correctly. Ok. :) ObsidianCoast looks better then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 12:05:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091205.m39C5a64021933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 08:05 EST ------- BTW: Where does the wallpaper come from? AFAIR the final wallpaper for Waves isn't finished yet: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-April/msg00149.html IMHO it should match the default wallpaper we'll use after a login. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 12:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091211.m39CBbDR023422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-09 08:11 EST ------- Built in rawhide/F-9 and now pushed for F-7, F-8. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 12:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 08:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091250.m39CoHVn030563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 swhiteho at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|441634, 441636 | ------- Additional Comments From swhiteho at redhat.com 2008-04-09 08:50 EST ------- So far... 1. I've fixed the license in F-8, and I'll see if we can get the right things added to the upstream source 3. I'll try and sort that out shortly 4. Fixed in F-8, will move changes to other versions shortly once we've worked through all the issues in F-8 5. probably. I need to check that one 6. I'll look into that too 7. license fixed, man page perms are fixed in upstream git, but not yet in the release tar ball. I'll try and get another release done. 8. There are more than just the two you've spotted, most of them depend on getting changes that are already done in upstream into the rpm. I've just added two more for build warnings in fact that we ought not to have. Kevin, don't rerun your stuff quite yet, but please do take this as an indication that we are working on the issues at the moment and it shouldn't be too long before we are done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 13:07:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091307.m39D7rYK001375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-09 09:07 EST ------- it's fixed now. could you please review it again? thanks it's not the final wallpaper. We will update package if there's final wallpaper done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 13:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091321.m39DLoea004192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rafalzaq at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 13:24:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091324.m39DOdFi014474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-09 09:24 EST ------- Yes it is my first try at packaging something for fedora, so please go easy on me (hehee). ':-) Should I create an account? The main problem I have with your direction is that the file you said '/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cwiid-0.6.00-py2.5.egg-info' is not installed in my version(*). If add this file the rpm fails to build in my machine. What I did was to change the line that specify "%{python_sitelib}/cwiid.so" to " %{python_sitelib}/*" since this file is on that same dir this may cover both build environments. Also I am checking the rpmlint errors, I hope I can upload a new version soon, thanks. (*)I am building it with the fedora 8, should I be building it with a rawride version? I usually prefer to use the stable version, but I guess it should no be hard to make a building VM to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 13:33:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436707] Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091333.m39DXPnt016209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436707 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mr.ecik at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2008-04-09 09:33 EST ------- Let me review it. + dist present + license good + rpmlint completely quiet + md5sums match (a92a73e84ec1b62abeae8b3855d0220c) + latest version being packaged + BRs fine + nothing wrong with dirs' owning + %clean present + buildroot fine + %files fine (I would prefer %{_bindir}/%{name} instead of %{_bindir}/* though but I leave it to yourself) + scriptlets required for icons are present + GUI app and desktop file fine Everything is ok, so all I can write is: APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 13:57:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091357.m39DvZa7022204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-09 09:57 EST ------- Spec URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/wave-kdm-theme/fedorawaves-kdm-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/wave-kdm-theme/fedorawaves-kdm-theme-1.0-1.f9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 14:40:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091440.m39EeV7u021756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 10:40 EST ------- > In my reading of the packaging guidelines I'm only allowed to import the > _approved_ SRPM (here 4.0.2-0.2-20080303svn). If you're that pedantic... ;-) I have imported approved SRPM + minor updates on more than one occasion. It doesn't really matter either way, of course. As for the License tag, as the LGPL can be converted to the GPL, writing just GPLv2+ instead of LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ is not that big an issue, but of course being precise is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 14:46:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091446.m39EknGt000711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 10:46 EST ------- Oops, I meant writing just "GPLv2+" instead of "LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+", not "or". Either way, my point stands. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 14:44:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091444.m39EiWfF032499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-09 10:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout-1.0.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091519.m39FJJwG030198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 11:19 EST ------- rpmlint has one complaint: fedorawaves-kdm-theme.noarch: W: no-documentation Shouldn't there be a COPYING file included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091522.m39FMwoO008318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:22 EST ------- we should ignore this, it could be done later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint-0.05-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint.spec Description: This module wraps CGI::Untaint up into a Catalyst plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091532.m39FWOGZ010330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: AcetoneISO2 Short Description: CD/DVD Image Manipulator Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:38:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091538.m39Fcapv011740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:38 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091539.m39FdukF011962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-09 11:39 EST ------- Excellent. Just let me know when you would like me to recheck things. Thanks for looking at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091540.m39FeW41012475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-09 11:40 EST ------- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=559812 Minor BR update: SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint-0.05-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091543.m39FhuID003027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:43 EST ------- Sooo, new snapshot aims at compliance with current Java guidelines, ready for review: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.6-8.hg275.fc9.x86_64/opengrok-0.6-8.hg275.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.6-8.hg275.fc9.x86_64/ Known issues: * Does not compile with GCJ 1.5, I will probably need assistance from someone who is better familiar with Java language and tools * Web application package is a crap, and the guidelines are not finished yet. It can eventually be omitted and reviewed separately once guidelines are finished. RPMLint: Quiet, except for -tomcat5 subpackage, see above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091547.m39FlHN5013885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:47 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:44:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091544.m39FiYao013128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:44 EST ------- Please request some branches. I'm assuming you don't want an empty cvs add. :P -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:46:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091546.m39FkEYC013720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 11:46 EST ------- MUST Items: + rpmlint output: fedorawaves-kdm-theme.noarch: W: no-documentation harmless, ignoring + named and versioned according to the Package Naming Guidelines + spec file name matches base package name + Packaging Guidelines: + License GPL+ OK, matches actual license + No known patent problems + No emulator, no firmware, no binary-only or prebuilt components + Complies with the FHS + proper changelog, tags, BuildRoot, BuildRequires (none needed), Summary, Description ! Requires: kde-settings-kdm should be Requires: kdebase-kdm + no non-UTF-8 characters + no documentation relevant to include + nothing to compile, so RPM_OPT_FLAGS are irrelevant + nothing to compile (noarch package), so no debuginfo package + no static libraries nor .la files + no duplicated system libraries + no binaries => no rpaths + no configuration files, so %config guideline doesn't apply + no init scripts, so init script guideline doesn't apply + no GUI executables, so no .desktop file needed + ... and thus no desktop-file-install needed either (KdmGreeterTheme.desktop is not really a .desktop file, it's a theme description) + no timestamp-clobbering file commands (cp -p is being used) + nothing to build, so _smp_mflags are irrelevant + scriptlets are valid + not a web application, so web application guideline doesn't apply + no conflicts + complies with all the legal guidelines + no license in the tarball to include as %doc + no upstream, skipping source matches upstream check + builds on at least one arch (F8 i386) + no known non-working arches, so no ExcludeArch needed + no BuildRequires needed + no translations, so translation/locale guidelines don't apply + no shared libraries, so no ldconfig call needed + package not relocatable + ownership correct (owns package-specific directories, doesn't own directories owned by another package) + no duplicate files in %files + permissions correct, defattr used correctly + %clean section present and correct + macros used where possible + no non-code content + no large documentation files, so no -doc package needed + no %doc files, so no %doc files required at runtime + no header files which would need to be in a -devel subpackage + no static libraries, so no -static package needed + no .pc files, so no Requires: pkgconfig needed + no .so symlinks vs. plugins + no -devel package, so "-devel should require %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" is irrelevant + no .la files + no GUI executables, so no .desktop file needed + buildroot is deleted at the beginning of %install + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: ! no license file in the tarball + no translations for description and summary provided by upstream * skipping mock test (nothing to build, no BRs needed) * skipping all arch test (it's noarch anyway) * skipping functionality test (already tested, see previous comments) + scriptlets are sane + no subpackages other than -devel, so "Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency." is irrelevant + no .pc files, so "placement of .pc files" is irrelevant + no file dependencies APPROVED, but please change Requires: kde-settings-kdm to Requires: kdebase-kdm after import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:54:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091554.m39Fseu0005271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rob.myers at gtri.gat | |ech.edu) ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:54 EST ------- The Eclipse plugin packaging guidelines have now been ratified by the Fedora Packaging Committee and FESCo. Rob, are there any changes to make to this package to match the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:57:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225806] Merge Review: glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091557.m39FvVj1016121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glibc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225806 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:57:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091557.m39FvWSN016146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225806, which changed state. Bug 225806 Summary: Merge Review: glibc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225806 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091554.m39FsPdw015355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 11:54 EST ------- We want devel and F-9, we can wait for the mass-branching for the latter though, we don't need separate F10 builds yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:55:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091555.m39Ft8lY015842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(alcapcom at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:55 EST ------- Alphonse: are there any changes necessary to this package to meet the recently-approved guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225806] Merge Review: glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091557.m39FvAGq006123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glibc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225806 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:57 EST ------- Talked to Jakub, and he explained the logic there. I'm comfortable with this spec file now. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 15:56:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091556.m39Fu2vP005836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-09 11:56 EST ------- The Eclipse plugin packaging guidelines have now been ratified by the FPC and FESCo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:03:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091703.m39H32Cc030085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-09 13:03 EST ------- it's fixed, could you please review it again? thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091704.m39H4Wp5030277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(rob.myers at gtri.gat| |ech.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-09 13:04 EST ------- I don't think there are any changes needed to match the guidelines. Note: This eclipse-anyedit-1.8.2 (for Eclipse 3.2) will be for EPEL5, and use copy-platform in the build. I'll make a new eclipse-anyedit-1.9.3 (for Eclipse 3.3+) for rawhide, and use the newer pdebuild in the build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091707.m39H7J9k021205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 13:07 EST ------- OK, that resolves the only real issue I found. Just to confirm: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091710.m39HAdue021895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 13:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091714.m39HETcF022372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-04-09 13:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedorawaves-kdm-theme Short Description: Fedora Waves KDM Theme Owners: than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes For the branches, we need devel only, F-9 can wait for the mass branching. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:18:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091718.m39HI3jE023266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-04-09 13:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-LibMagic Short Description: The File::LibMagic is a simple perl interface to libmagic Owners: joshkayse, rmyers Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 18:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091857.m39Ivqxu013329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-09 14:57 EST ------- Ah, missed some builddeps there. Will fix tonight, thanks. Just to clarify, you're not officially reviewing this package, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 19:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091904.m39J4a8t025860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-09 15:04 EST ------- OK. But how can "close this bug as "NEXTRELEASE"" ? I've read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join: >Close the Bugzilla ticket when the package has been built successfully. >Remember the Bugzilla ticket for your review? You should close it as >NEXTRELEASE. But did not found status "CLOSED". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 19:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091910.m39JAsOR016817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 richardfearn at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From richardfearn at gmail.com 2008-04-09 15:10 EST ------- Hi - just changing this so that it blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR rather than depending on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 19:38:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804091938.m39JccUu001356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-09 15:38 EST ------- Mark "Resolve bug" in this bug report (below) and select "changing resolution to" as "NEXTRELEASE" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 20:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804092008.m39K87Tr029724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-09 16:08 EST ------- The reason I ask is that we have specific procedures for new packagers. Please look over the documentation at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join. You're well on your way, but be aware that you will need a sponsor so please do provide that extra information which is requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 20:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804092023.m39KNdku000396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-09 16:23 EST ------- Giancarlo, now that the licensing situation has been resolved, could you release a tarball that has the new licensing stated explicitly? Or if there's no imminent release planned, perhaps a GPG-signed document detailing the new dual-licensing situation. I'll then get the package properly submitted. Thanks, -- Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 20:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804092049.m39KnGwS015980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-09 16:49 EST ------- Package imported and built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=560246 Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 20:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 16:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] New: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-cecil-flowanalysis.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-cecil-flowanalysis-0.1-0.1.20080409svn100264.fc9.src.rpm Description: Flowanalysis engine for Cecil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 22:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804092246.m39MkQMb005770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-09 18:46 EST ------- Oh one more thing, there is no LICENSE file but there is a COPYING file that is now bundled with the main package. Would this cover the "includes LICENSE file in %doc" point? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 22:44:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804092244.m39Mibbs005203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-09 18:44 EST ------- There I fixed almost every rpmlint problem and tried to fix the problem that appeared in josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu compilation. But there are still some problems left in rpmlint, but I don't know how to solve them : cwiid.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.00-2 0.6.00-2bog I use a different distribution tag to make my rpms, so I can find them easily among the installed packages. I don't want to write the name of the distribution in the change log because it will cause the same problem when compiled for other distributions. cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cwiid-python2.x86_64: W: no-documentation All the documentation went to the right places, those two packages simply do not have any real documentation. The spec file was overwritten, but the corresponding src.rpm is now : http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid-0.6.00-2bog.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 00:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100019.m3A0JL6p021804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-09 20:19 EST ------- Several problems: ? rpmlint: strange permission on tarball, 0600 (binary is clean) ? claims to be noarch, but installs files under %{libdir}. This is a problem as Koji will build the package only once, so %{libdir} might be /usr/lib or /usr/lib64. Can Lua, like Python, use two library paths, one for arch-independent libraries and another for arch-dependent? Otherwise, just remove the noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 00:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100045.m3A0joWA027440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-09 20:45 EST ------- Thanks for the heads-up! Same problem as luadoc: - rpmlint: strange permission for tarball: 0600 - package is noarch but installs files in %{_libdir} - does not seem to work on x86_64: > require "logging.console" > local logger = logging.console() > =logger nil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 02:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100222.m3A2MkrX009242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-09 22:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > any reason (SQL::Translator 0.09000)tests are skipping for -devel build then. I see > t/03podcoverage............................skipped > all skipped: set TEST_POD to enable this test POD coverage tests currently "fail", so this needs to be disabled. Noted in the updated spec below (release 5). > t/86sqlt...................................skipped > all skipped: SQL::Translator required > > t/94versioning.............................skipped > all skipped: needs DBD::SQLite and SQL::Translator 0.09 for testing These two tests (including the optional CDBI-compat tests, apparently) depend on an undocumented prereq of Class::Data::Inheritable -- added as a BR. > t/bindtype_columns.........................skipped > all skipped: Set $ENV{DBICTEST_PG_DSN}, _USER and _PASS to run this test This optional test requires a live postgresql database to test against; not available in the buildsystem. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=560545 SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class-0.08010-5.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 02:30:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100230.m3A2UOrp014181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 22:30 EST ------- Two items of concern: 1. pkg-licence/gpl_GB.txt should be in %doc. Please fix before committing. 2. Your release version isn't quite right. It should be: Release: 0.2.beta2%{?dist} Look closely at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines (except for Release) - package meets packaging guidelines (OpenOffice.orgExtensions) - license (GPLv2+) OK, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (928230a58c4d5678e579c78ea6ab6f0bf226d08b) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Show me a spec with those items fixed, and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 02:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100231.m3A2VOaM010886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 02:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100248.m3A2mARD017094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-09 22:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 02:51:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 22:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100251.m3A2pd3O014438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-09 22:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 03:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100322.m3A3M79T023647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-09 23:22 EST ------- Spec url: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice-ooolatex.spec * Wed Apr 9 2008 Alex Lancaster - 4.0.0-0.3.beta2 - Fix Release - Include license in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 03:31:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100331.m3A3VKgB021250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-09 23:31 EST ------- Perhaps you would like to upload the new spec file? The one there is not fixed. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 04:18:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100418.m3A4IWQk000534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove Alias: perl-XML-Grove https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 04:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100418.m3A4IFP7000475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 04:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100417.m3A4HPpO000412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-10 00:17 EST ------- rpmlint complained universalindentgui.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(PerlTidyLib) The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. universalindentgui.i386: I: checking universalindentgui.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/universalindentgui/indenters/example.cpp A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. universalindentgui.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/universalindentgui/indenters/example.sh 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. universalindentgui.i386: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/universalindentgui/indenters/example.sh This script has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It will prevent its execution. universalindentgui.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/universalindentgui-0.8.1/iniFileFormat.html The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 04:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100418.m3A4I1n7029083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 04:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435543] Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100418.m3A4IiUg029156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridloc - A ncurses console application for the calculation of Maidenhead QRA Locators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435543 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 04:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100447.m3A4l3xS005711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-10 00:47 EST ------- Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/sawfish/sawfish-%{version}.tar.gz i would use Source:http://download.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz %build #make -- can be removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 05:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100535.m3A5ZNcG014485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-10 01:35 EST ------- Somehow the fedora-review was set to '-' so that it did not show up on the open review ticket. Do any of the CC'd folks want to finish this up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 05:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100553.m3A5rWiN017551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-10 01:53 EST ------- Ah sorry, I posted the wrong link, it should have been: http://alexlan.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openoffice.org-ooolatex.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 05:52:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 01:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100552.m3A5qKLZ017438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-10 01:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Perhaps you would like to upload the new spec file? The one there is not fixed. ;) Umm, did you refresh the browser? I didn't regenerate the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 06:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100621.m3A6LweP022929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-04-10 02:21 EST ------- the jlc file are the same, atleast across i386,ia64, and ppc64. update spec file to include libtool in build dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 06:27:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100627.m3A6RERP023827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-04-10 02:27 EST ------- thanks Alexander. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 07:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100711.m3A7BxF9026862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-10 03:11 EST ------- thanks jensp for comments modified spec file as per suggestions links for updates files: http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-3.fc9.src.rpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 07:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 03:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100746.m3A7k9oO000393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-10 03:46 EST ------- Please see also bug 433433 where there is a some (successful) testing of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 08:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100843.m3A8hHl4016949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-10 04:43 EST ------- - Strange permission fixed (download was 600 by default) - Which files are in %{_libdir}? There are only files in %{_datadir}! Don't be tricked by the %{lualibdir} define, this is just part of my standard defines for Lua packages, but this package in fact does not build a C lib but only contains plain Lua files. Please re-check or name the files that happen to be in libdir when you compile (I just did new compiles for both packages and can't see a problem here). Please otherwise attached your "rpm -qpl" output of the resulting package. I have uploaded the very same SRPM again with the only change being the permissions of the source tarballs. I didn't bump the version for this so please just download the SRPM mentioned above again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 08:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100849.m3A8nVYE013640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-10 04:49 EST ------- Same as luadoc, re-uploaded the very same SRPM with fixed source tarball permissions. For this package there is nothing in %{_libdir} as well, tricked by lualibdir define? Please otherwise attach "rpm -qpl" output of resulting package. For the test you did: it cannot work the way you did it! The Lua shell compiles every line as its own chunk. If you use "local logger" then it's only defined for that very line and cannot be used in the next line. You can use either: > local logger = logging.console(); logger:info("Test") (have it both on one line such that logger is defined) or just don't have the local such that the logger is global and thus available in the following lines. This has nothing to do with x86_64 (I'm testing on this platform myself) - after all this package is true noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100907.m3A977Qe025115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-10 05:07 EST ------- * Thu Apr 10 2008 Dan Horak 1.3.2-4 - fix build on ppc Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski-1.3.2-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:17:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] New: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/imapsync/imapsync.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/imapsync/imapsync-1.249-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=560722 Description: imapsync is a tool for facilitating incremental recursive IMAP transfers from one mailbox to another. It is useful for mailbox migration, and reduces the amount of data transferred by only copying messages that are not present on both servers. Read, unread, and deleted flags are preserved, and the process can be stopped and resumed. The original messages can optionally be deleted after a successful transfer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:25:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100925.m3A9Pchn024333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100935.m3A9ZO8f026425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 alcapcom at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(alcapcom at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From alcapcom at gmail.com 2008-04-10 05:35 EST ------- Not sure, I should take a look on it evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:39:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100939.m3A9dJM2027173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100936.m3A9aCE0026795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-10 05:36 EST ------- 05:28 btw veci ako dependency na perl-Test-Simple zmen na perl(Test::Simple) 05:28 koli tomu, ze perlove moduly sa dost casto merguju rovno do perlu 05:29 ok urobim hned Just for the record I told you :) Otherwise the package seems fine * rpmlint issues no complains * qa script likes the package * provides/requires are (more-or-less, see above) sane * filelists are sane * documentation is present and contains the license text * source is the same as upstream * version matches latest one therefore APPROVED and please address the trivial complaint about the buildrequires. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 09:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804100951.m3A9pNO6001011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-10 05:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imapcopy Short Description: Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 10:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 06:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101057.m3AAvNia010022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2008-04-10 06:57 EST ------- Great, done and built on all three branches (F-7, F-8 and devel) - see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6031 Upstream has now released a new version (1.1.14) and I have updated the spec file; but for this I just built the latest 1.1.13 with changes from here - shall I request a separate bug to review that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 11:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101112.m3ABCuIM016279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-10 07:12 EST ------- No, you do not need to review the updates of the package. Just use the procedure described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo Of course, if you are unsure or in need of assistance drop me an email ( in private) and I will do my best to help you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 12:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101205.m3AC5vLV023681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-10 08:05 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED. Don't forget to drop that comment about "unzipping", since you're not. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 12:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101227.m3ACRJ2e027357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-10 08:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openoffice.org-ooolatex Short Description: Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Owners: alexlan Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 12:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101238.m3ACcemk032004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-10 08:38 EST ------- ping, Can we go on with this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 12:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101253.m3ACrJ0K031940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-10 08:53 EST ------- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines: YES - Spec file matches base package name: YES - Spec has consistant macro usage: YES - Meets Packaging Guidelines: YES - License: YES, MIT, http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewcvs/trunk/cecil/flowanalysis/README?view=markup - License field in spec matches: YES - License file included in package: YES, text included in README - Spec in American English: YES - Spec is legible.: YES - Sources match upstream md5sum: No source upstream, only SVN. Tried verifying the tarball, but it's only in .tar.gz format, whereas the tarball in package is .tar.bz2, so won't match. Should probably add comment in spec file about exactly which SVN revision used as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Package needs ExcludeArch: YES, ppc64 - BuildRequires correct: YES, mono-devel - Spec handles locales/find_lang: N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.: YES - Package has a correct %clean section.: YES - Package has correct buildroot: YES %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - Package is code or permissible content. YES - Doc subpackage needed/used.: N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. YES - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch: YES. successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=560739 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. YES - Package owns all the directories it creates. YES - rpmlint output: mono-cecil-flowanalysis.i386: E: no-binary mono-cecil-flowanalysis.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib these can be ignored as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono - final provides and requires are sane: mono(Mono.Cecil) = 0.5.0.1 mono(mscorlib) = 1.0.5000.0 mono(Cecil.FlowAnalysis) = 0.1.0.0 mono-cecil-flowanalysis = 0.1-0.1.20080409svn100264.fc8 no bogus provides there it appears, unlike certain other packages SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. YES (see koji build above) - Should build on all supported archs: YES (see koji) - Should have dist tag: YES - Should package latest version: YES (SVN version) Issues: 1. Add comment in spec showing which exact SVN version used for this particular tarball as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 Fix this and I think I can approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 13:00:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101300.m3AD0rAb003994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-10 09:00 EST ------- Also, I just noticed that there are some testcases in the SVN tree, is it worth packaging those and running them before installation or not? Are these unit tests for the app? Probably could be done after import as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 13:09:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101309.m3AD9aEs005918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |imapsync-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 13:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] New: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-DBD-ODBC.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-DBD-ODBC-1.15-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Perl ODBC Driver for DBI. This module is needed to access ODBC databases from within Perl. The module uses the unixODBC manager to connect to the database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 14:10:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101410.m3AEAYWI016098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-10 10:10 EST ------- imapsync != imapcopy what's the real name of the package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 14:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101423.m3AENCCs021587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-10 10:23 EST ------- Manuel, it's imapsync. Sorry, /me stupid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 14:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101444.m3AEiaoa023742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-10 10:44 EST ------- not attentive != stupid :) I suggest reissuing a [corrected] CVS request. btw: nice job, I was looking for this tool a couple of days ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 15:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101511.m3AFBHBO032483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-04-10 11:11 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: seekwatcher New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 15:11:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101511.m3AFBXaQ032523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-04-10 11:11 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: blktrace New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 15:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101535.m3AFZUXH006037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-10 11:35 EST ------- Sorry, for some reason I thought I had already approved this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 15:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101554.m3AFsGuh010168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-10 11:54 EST ------- Brandon, did you find any time to look into this review? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 15:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101554.m3AFs557010105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-04-10 11:54 EST ------- > i would use Source:..... I do not think that an expansion of such URL really works. The only way I know for getting those source from sourceforge is to peek under http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 16:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101603.m3AG37qt012137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 16:02:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101602.m3AG2iCR009518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-10 12:02 EST ------- Thanks! I don't see it yet in bugzilla, I wanted to move all bugs from freenx to freenx-server. But maybe I'm just impatient and bugzilla only shows this entry once the built packages appear in rawhide first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 16:12:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441637] Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101612.m3AGCT3N014213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedorawaves-kdm-theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441637 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-04-10 12:12 EST ------- built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 16:25:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101625.m3AGPcCH017343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-10 12:25 EST ------- Source needs to be: http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpich2/downloads/tarballs/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Also, is not building in current rawhide mock: gcc -fPIC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/channels/dllchan/../ssm/src -I../../../../../include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/util/sock -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/util/sock -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/util/sock -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/common/datatype -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/common/sock -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/common/sock/poll -I../../../../common/sock -I../../../../common/sock/poll -I../include -I../../../include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/channels/ssm/include -I../../../../common/locks -I/builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/common/locks -c ch3_finalize.c -o _sch3_finalize.o In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/include/mpidpre.h:31, from ../../../../../include/mpiimpl.h:99, from /builddir/build/BUILD/mpich2-1.0.7/src/mpid/ch3/include/mpidimpl.h:22, from ../include/mpidi_ch3_impl.h:12, from ch3_finalize.c:7: ../include/mpidi_ch3_pre.h:39:2: error: #error No shared memory subsystem defined In file included from ch3_finalize.c:7: ../include/mpidi_ch3_impl.h:233:2: error: #error *** No shared memory mapping variables specified *** make[7]: *** [ch3_finalize.lo] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 16:30:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101630.m3AGUGpI018371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-10 12:30 EST ------- Thanks, you're right :) New CSV request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imapsync Short Description: Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 16:41:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101641.m3AGfAS2017760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-10 12:41 EST ------- There is some kind of issue with the bugzilla sync script it seems. ;( Hopefully it will be fixed soon. It's being worked on. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250504] Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101722.m3AHMZel030425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blktrace - block IO tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250504 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-10 13:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:26:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285571] Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101726.m3AHQFu5031660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seekwatcher - IO visualization with blktrace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-10 13:26 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436707] Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101738.m3AHcINZ002102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436707 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-04-10 13:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: biloba Short Description: A tactical board game Owners: rafalzaq Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101736.m3AHa8Ep030570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-10 13:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101742.m3AHgvvH003260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-10 13:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436707] Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101752.m3AHq3Dk005503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436707 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-10 13:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 17:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441899] New: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441899 Summary: Review Request: inadyn-mt - Dynamic DNS Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/inadyn-mt/inadyn-mt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/inadyn-mt/inydyn-mt-2.11.96-1.src.rpm Description: INADYN-MT is a dynamic DNS client. It maintains the IP address of a host name. It periodically checks wheather the IP address stored by the DSN server is the real current address of the machine that is running INADYN. Comments: For compatible to inadyn the initscript will stilled named inadyn. Thiw will caused a message from rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101800.m3AI0i6R003925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-10 14:00 EST ------- My download was 660 (using spectool -gf). Perhaps spectool fixes the permission by default. And you're correct, there was no %{_libdir} files -- sorry, I was not looking carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:16:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101816.m3AIGDOg011033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-10 14:16 EST ------- Aha! So that's the scope of local. I was expecting the context to be the entire top-level, not just the single compilation unit. Thanks. ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: noarch ? build dependencies complete: OK ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: N/A ? library -> ldconfig: N/A ? relocatable: give reason: N/A ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? large docs => -doc: N/A ? doc not runtime dependent: N/A ? headers in -devel: N/A ? static in -static: N/A ? if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig: N/A ? if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel: N/A ? devel requires versioned base package: N/A ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: N/A ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? if license text missing, ask upstream to include it: N/A ? desc and summary contain translations if available: No ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK ? package functioned as described: OK ? scriplets are sane: OK ? other subpackages should require versioned base: N/A ? if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package: N/A ? require package not files: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101817.m3AIHwq8007649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-10 14:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302039) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302039&action=view) Result of rebuilding F8's openssl in F9/Rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:19:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101819.m3AIJdiZ007853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 anyremote at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:19:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101819.m3AIJeM1007887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 Bug 433219 depends on bug 433135, which changed state. Bug 433135 Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:19:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101819.m3AIJfEg007913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 Bug 433220 depends on bug 433135, which changed state. Bug 433135 Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:21:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101821.m3AILcXR012140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-10 14:21 EST ------- ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: noarch ? build dependencies complete: OK ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: N/A ? library -> ldconfig: N/A ? relocatable: give reason: N/A ? own all directories: See note below ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? large docs => -doc: N/A ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK ? package functioned as described: OK ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK Note: both luadoc and lua-logging requires lua >= 5.1, but install files under %{_datadir}/lua/5.1 . Perhaps make them also require lua < 5.2 ? Otherwise things will break when lua 5.2 is released: users might end up with dangling /usr/share/lua/5.1 directories APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101825.m3AIPf6v013159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-10 14:25 EST ------- For 2.7-1: * Spec file name - Spec file name must be ganyremote.spec . * Requires - "pygtk2" has "Requires: python(abi) = 2.5" and "Requires: python >= 2.4" is not needed and should be removed. - /usr/bin/ganyremote has some extra dependency such as ----------------------------------------------------------------- 222 ret = getResult('hcitool name '+data,'browser') 250 elif (isInstalled('bluetooth-sendto') == 'OK'): 251 sender = 'bluetooth-sendto --dest=' ..... ----------------------------------------------------------------- Apparently ganyremote should have "Requires: bluez-utils" * autotool call - build.log shows: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 62 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30585 63 + umask 022 64 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD 65 + cd ganyremote-2.7 66 + LANG=C 67 + export LANG 68 + unset DISPLAY 69 + rm -rf /var/tmp/ganyremote-2.7-1.fc9-root-mockbuild 70 + make DESTDIR=/var/tmp/ganyremote-2.7-1.fc9-root-mockbuild install 71 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/ganyremote-2.7/missing --run aclocal-1.10 72 /builddir/build/BUILD/ganyremote-2.7/missing: line 54: aclocal-1.10: command not found 73 WARNING: `aclocal-1.10' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 74 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want 75 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from 76 any GNU archive site. 77 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/ganyremote-2.7/missing --run automake-1.10 --gnu ----------------------------------------------------------------- Here autotools are called automatically, which is unwilling because this may change configure, makefiles in unwilling ways. This usually means that the timestamps of related files (i.e. configure{,in} etc) are wrong and this can usually be fixed by "touch"ing those files. * desktop file directory - Don't install desktop files under other than %{_datadir}/applications * desktop file Category - If you want that the group of this rpm should be "Applications/System", then the installed desktop file should have "System" category. * Directory structure - Please move documents to under %_defaultdocdir (preferably %_defaultdocdir/%name-%version, modification for %_bindir/%name is needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101829.m3AITQ7Z009839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(timothy.selivanow@ | |virtualxistenz.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-10 14:29 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 18:53:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101853.m3AIr5iN016337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-10 14:53 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional > > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. > > > > Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 > > > > > > > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-09 16:23 EST ------- > > Giancarlo, now that the licensing situation has been resolved, could you release > > a tarball that has the new licensing stated explicitly? Or if there's no > > imminent release planned, perhaps a GPG-signed document detailing the new > > dual-licensing situation. I'll then get the package properly submitted. > > > > Thanks, > > Thank you. I didn't insist because I didn't want to bother you/Fedora in the eve of version 9. The dual license situation is as follow: as the Committee President (and lead developer), I certify that we the Comittee agreed on the fact that GPLv2 license are compatible with the aims of our project. Just, we want to grant some further degree of freedom for commercial applications, that may prefer to apply FPLL rather than GPLv2. So, we acknowledge this fact and we grant anyone the right to distribute The Falcon Programming Language or any other software issued by our project under the terms of GPLv2. I.e. you may substitute the LICENSE file with the following notice: =============== Copyright 2004-2008, Giancarlo Niccolai et. al (See the AUTHORS file) This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either: a) the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version, or b) the Falcon Programming Language License version 1.1 (available at http://www.falconpl.org/?page_id=license_1_1 ). ================ And you can add GPL verbatim or a link to it. GPG: http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE67C2CA012030B86 - -or- http://www.niccolai.cc/public.gpg - ----- The situation is as follows: version 1.1 of the license (fedora-legal has 1.0) seems to be fine with debian-legal, and my legals have analized it and approved it, but we're dual licensing our project with GPL to remove any possible doubt about our project not being free software. We'll file FPLL for OSI certification and eventually (but not necessarily) stop dual licensing once certified that FPLL grants the same freedom as GPL, and more, by OSI. We ourselves didn't re-release Falcon 0.8.8 under dual licensing just because of lack of time, and because our 0.8.10 version is being readied in this days. We gladfully grant anyone the right to do so if he wish. Bests, Giancarlo Niccolai. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH/mF55nwsoBIDC4YRAmLhAKCQ555llBq86orlMtMPKASIZO/X3gCfS73V O5LTJQeiLQyRhFvls1/Kaug= =lsIE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 19:44:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101944.m3AJidP5027645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-04-10 15:44 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I've been very busy at work... All notes in the previous comment should be fixed in this release: Spec URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave.spec SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/qtoctave-0.7.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Could you try again, please? Waiting for new comments... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 19:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101944.m3AJiNoo027591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ------- Additional Comments From claudio at claudiotomasoni.it 2008-04-10 15:44 EST ------- Hi Ed, I'm very sorry for the delay (I've been very busy these days). Here is a new release with your patches applied and some other fixes (paths cleanup). New SPEC URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/octaviz.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.claudiotomasoni.it/files/RPMS/octaviz-0.4.7-3.fc8.src.rpm Could you try it, please? (it works at home for both i686 and x86_64). I will be very happy to do a "pre-review", but I won't be able to do it until next monday. I will point you to my comments as soon as possible. Thanks indeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 19:46:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101946.m3AJk3Wr028307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-10 15:46 EST ------- Giancarlo Niccolai & Co: Many thanks! Michel, can you do a new srpm with that mail included in %doc and the License: tag set to GPLv2+, then I'm ready to approve this package.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 19:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804101949.m3AJnvw6032461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2008-04-10 15:49 EST ------- Don't know... Shipping an xpm that isn't being used as DOC is, umm... seem wasteful. (Especially given the fact that idesk -really- dislikes xpm's) Not sure I understood the sed comment - can you elaborate? I'll add a short comment about xterm.xpm. (I had to copy the file itself - pulling gnome-desktop just for sake of a sample more-or-less goes against the purpose of idesk...) Thanks again, Gilboa -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:10:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102010.m3AKAkWV002066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-10 16:10 EST ------- Thank you Lubomir and Kevin. The package has been imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:24:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102024.m3AKORpj004726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-04-10 16:24 EST ------- Hi Claudio, that's cool -- and please don't feel that there is a big hurry! We're both volunteers and we work on these Fedora things as our free time allows. I'll do a more thorough octaviz review probably over the weekend. Hope you have a good weekend! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102027.m3AKRT22009253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-10 16:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Don't know... Shipping an xpm that isn't being used as DOC is, umm... seem > wasteful. (Especially given the fact that idesk -really- dislikes xpm's) No problem. I thought it made a good icon for users to use for their home. Especially if the original example is shipped in %doc. > Not sure I understood the sed comment - can you elaborate? If %_datadir is set to something else than /usr/share, examples/default.lnk will still have /usr/share in the path, even if the file is in %_datadir. > I'll add a short comment about xterm.xpm. (I had to copy the file itself - > pulling gnome-desktop just for sake of a sample more-or-less goes against the > purpose of idesk...) Of course, copying it is the best, but we should know where it comes from, be it only to know which license covers it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102037.m3AKbqDf008198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-10 16:37 EST ------- Done. http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.8/Falcon-0.8.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Please, feel free to fix glitches without further notice. I just took your package , added a file now listed in %doc and changed the license tag as GPLv2+, but plz double check. Bests, Giancarlo Niccolai. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102040.m3AKegYa012629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-10 16:40 EST ------- Oh, and also added the dual license plaque as indicated above to the LICENSE file, and updated to FPLL 1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 20:59:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102059.m3AKxHi8013503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-10 16:59 EST ------- Michel, do you want me to check Giancarlo's srpm, or should I wait for an updated one from you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 21:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] New: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/eet.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/eet-0.9.99900-1.fc9.src.rpm i386 and x86_64 RPMs built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/ Description: Eet is a tiny library designed to write an arbitary set of chunks of data to a file and optionally compress each chunk (very much like a zip file) and allow fast random-access reading of the file later on. It does not do zip as a zip itself has more complexity than is needed, and it was much simpler to implement this once here. It also can encode and decode data structures in memory, as well as image data for saving to eet files or sending across the network to other machines, or just writing to arbitary files on the system. All data is encoded in a platform independent way and can be written and read by any architecture. RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to built software against this library. I spent a week studying RPM documentation and packaging guidelines, i appreciate any feedback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 21:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102133.m3ALXMGN021092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-10 17:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-logging Short Description: A simple API to use logging features in Lua Owners: timn Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 21:35:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102135.m3ALZuZF025451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-10 17:35 EST ------- Thanks for the reviews and pushing for Lua SIG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 21:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102136.m3ALaoqC025632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-10 17:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: luadoc Short Description: Documentation Generator Tool for Lua Owners: timn Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 22:32:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102232.m3AMWQGF004794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-10 18:32 EST ------- Once those things are fixed though, I think we're good to go on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 22:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102239.m3AMdq4A006174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-10 18:39 EST ------- The JRuby guys are working on fixing JRuby so that it runs on GCJ -- this will be in 1.1.1. They're aiming for a release later this week, so I'll upload a new Spec/SRPM then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 22:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102243.m3AMh10Z002608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(timothy.selivanow@| |virtualxistenz.com) | ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-04-10 18:43 EST ------- I'm sorry, I didn't read all of your last comment. I already have a FAS account and I'm waiting on cvsextras commit (is it really supposed to be cvsextras still? Seems like that should have been remove when Extras was merged with Core...). So for the formalities... I'm officially requesting sponsorship, and my FAS account name is "ravenoak". I'm not sure if you've noticed, but all of the Koji build links that I've posted (such as in comment #14) were under my FAS account. I'll double check the Package Maintainers doc to make sure I've hit all of the steps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 22:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102250.m3AMoW5Z008795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-10 18:50 EST ------- Marek, I've uploaded to http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/x11vnc the rpms for lzo, minilzo and libvncserver (including -devel). x11vnc must be patched in order to NOT use it's internal copy of minilzo. maybe using something similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302074 (which is ugly but seemed to work..) ? Second thought, maybe we should just clean libvncserver first since my modified spec creates packages which do not require libminilzo at runtime. Which I am not sure that is the correct behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 22:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102253.m3AMr4Og004605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 23:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102326.m3ANQHw7016139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-04-10 19:26 EST ------- no it isn't, there is no module mediawiki-HNP see comment #5 for request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 23:27:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102327.m3ANRct3011972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-04-10 19:27 EST ------- (it's in pkgdb though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 10 23:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804102342.m3ANglNf019297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-10 19:42 EST ------- Ok, builds fine in mock. Some rpmlint errors to fix: swing-layout.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean swing-layout.src: W: no-%clean-section Going through a quick checklist: * Upstream source is clean of binaries * License looks right * Spec is consistent If you fix the %clean section, I'll say this package is ready to be imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 01:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441981] New: Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441981 Summary: Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com I apologize if there exists an entry for chkrootkit review already, I've tried to locate it during the last 15 mins but I failed. As stated in https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-April/msg00021.html I would like to maintain this packahe in EPEL. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chkrootkit Short Description: Tool to locally check for signs of a rootkit Owners: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: bugs.michael at gmx.net Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 01:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441981] Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110106.m3B16aiX030506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441981 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 03:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110358.m3B3weAa001529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-10 23:58 EST ------- I have seen this work in most of the cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 04:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110402.m3B422wN002379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-11 00:02 EST ------- For sourceforge files, please use http://downloads.sourceforge.net/....... ^^^^^ ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 05:39:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110539.m3B5dUXr015113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-11 01:39 EST ------- Sorry, I ended up running out of time for a bit there. Some of the source is MIT licensed, some is GPLv2+ and some is GPLv2. That does make the result plain GPLv2. The obvious question is whether this decodes MP3 in any way, and as far as I can tell it doesn't, other than parsing the metadata. It can use external programs to transcode things to and from MP3 but it doesn't include those programs. * source files match upstream: 5f279eab49b6d71441358ef046fdbd3749396cf43818e436239fdb3e004e4ecb ezstream-0.5.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ezstream = 0.5.3-1.fc9 = libogg.so.0()(64bit) libshout.so.3()(64bit) libspeex.so.1()(64bit) libtag_c.so.0()(64bit) libtheora.so.0()(64bit) libvorbis.so.0()(64bit) libvorbisfile.so.3()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I don't really have any idea how to test this. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110605.m3B65WvK024107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-11 02:05 EST ------- I've added the clean section to do something. Spec URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://www.xelfi.cz/download/dev/SRPMS/swing-layout-1.0.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:20:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110620.m3B6KK33023052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-11 02:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > x11vnc must be patched in order to NOT use it's internal copy of minilzo. Are you sure of this? I was under impression that internal copy of minilzo is shipped with linvncserver. In my spec file I'm using --with-system-libvncserver=%{_libdir}, so it takes libvncserver libraries from the system (package libvncserver in our case) and not from the source tar ball. In other words, it's using internal copy of minilzo _from_ libvncserver package and thus the problem is with libvncserver package and not anymore with x11vnc. Is it correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266261] Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110638.m3B6cNmg030179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: knm_new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266261 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:38:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253175] Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110638.m3B6cP4R030220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jisksp16-1990-fonts - 16x16 JIS X 0212:1990 Bitmap font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253175 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 06:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253163] Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110638.m3B6cQLD030253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sazanami-fonts - Sazanami Japanese TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253163 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 07:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110701.m3B71w2X002090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-11 03:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ski Short Description: IA-64 user and system mode simulator Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 07:32:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110732.m3B7WNKQ003730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2008-04-11 03:32 EST ------- Gnome Menu Extended 0.8.1 has just been released with Pablo's improvements. The Fedora spec is now split into fc9 for fc8. The menu layout for Fedora 8 (or earlier) has a horizontal line after System Tools followed by Pirut, while the menu layout for Fedora 9 does not. Source: http://www.gtk-apps.org/content/show.php?content=73513 Screenshots: http://www.gtk-apps.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/78685-1.png http://www.gtk-apps.org/CONTENT/content-pre2/78685-2.png http://www.gtk-apps.org/CONTENT/content-pre3/78685-3.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 08:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110816.m3B8GTsD013598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-11 04:16 EST ------- Almost sure. According to my build.log, the minilzo.* files bundled with x11vnc are used. I'll try (later today) to verify if the patched libvncserver is really patched (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439979#c14 why) and re-verify the status of x11vnc towards this afterwards. Unless you beat me to it, the details of the patched libvncserver plus rpms built by me are available in #12 and bz #439979 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 08:16:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] New: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: atkac at redhat.com,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/bind-libbind.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/bind-libbind-9.3.3-1.src.rpm BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) includes a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS), the libbind resolver library compatible with that from ISC BIND 8. This package is going to be branched only for EPEL 4, as libbind doesn't exist there, but one of my packages should depend on it. EPEL 5 and all current Fedora releases are shipping libbind inside of the bind package. I choosed the libbind version from RHEL 5 to have a long update support and maybe some help from Adam Tkac, if needed. As per his suggestion, it is better to put this in EPEL 4, as RHEL 4 only should get bug fixes and no enhancements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 08:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 04:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110819.m3B8JEmX017956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |439047 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 09:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110945.m3B9j87Y002811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-04-11 05:45 EST ------- If you look at the log you can see multiple warnings like this: pem_x509.c: In function 'PEM_read_X509': pem_x509.c:68: warning: function called through a non-compatible type pem_x509.c:68: note: if this code is reached, the program will abort This is the most probable culprit. You would have to backport the code from 0.9.8g but I am not sure it would not break the ABI. The other easier possibility is to use the compat gcc compiler if it is allowed by package guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 09:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 05:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804110959.m3B9xFHC005143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-11 05:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: centerim New Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 11:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 07:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442022] New: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wordwarvi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wordwarvi-0.05-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Word War vi is your basic side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game. You pilot your "vi"per craft through core memory, rescuing lost .swp files, avoiding OS defenses, and wiping out those memory hogging emacs processes. When all the lost .swp files are rescued, head for the socket which will take you to the next node in the cluster. Note: Obviously, emacs is a fine editor and this is all very tongue in cheek, so don't be getting all bent out of shape because you like emacs better than vi, mmm-kay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 12:27:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111227.m3BCRDU2028533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 gvarisco at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gvarisco at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From gvarisco at redhat.com 2008-04-11 08:27 EST ------- I can't sponsor you, but as reviewer I just tried to build it and it seems OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 13:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111301.m3BD1oQw002854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-11 09:01 EST ------- Ok, looks good. You can now request the fedora-cvs? flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 13:16:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111316.m3BDGXBh011441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Summary|Review Request: grub2 - grub|Review Request: grub2 - The |next generation tools |GRand Unified Bootloader 2 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-11 09:16 EST ------- Work in progress still, gladly accepting patches. Just so that this won't rot on my hdd: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/grub2.spec http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/grub2-1.96-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 14:45:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] New: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-ndoc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-ndoc-1.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: NDoc generates class library documentation from .NET assemblies and the XML documentation files generated by the C# compiler. NDoc uses pluggable documenters to generate documentation in several different formats, including the MSDN-style HTML Help format (.chm), the Visual Studio .NET Help format (HTML Help 2), and MSDN-online style web pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 14:44:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] New: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-sharpcvslib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-sharpcvslib-0.35-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Gives C# projects the ability to communicate with a CVS server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 14:46:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442057] New: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057 Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-nunit22.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-nunit22-2.2.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: NUnit is a unit-testing framework for all .Net languages. Initially ported from JUnit, this xUnit based unit testing tool is written entirely in C# and has been completely redesigned to take advantage of many .NET language features, for example custom attributes and other reflection related capabilities. NUnit brings xUnit to all .NET languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111502.m3BF26jx001898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-11 11:02 EST ------- Gianluca. verifying that it builds is one step, but for a proper review you should follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111501.m3BF1mpn029341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-11 11:01 EST ------- Gianluca. verify that it builds is one step, but for a proper review you should follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:12:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111512.m3BFCmLA004013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 11:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-cecil-flowanalysis Short Description: Flowanalysis engine for Cecil Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442057] Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111509.m3BF9AP1003217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111514.m3BFEBRn031746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 11:14 EST ------- Whoops. I did cvs before finishing the review. :/ Here's the new spec file, does it look ok? http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-cecil-flowanalysis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111529.m3BFTZNc007536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-11 11:29 EST ------- I'll take a look in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442057] Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111543.m3BFhZuC010990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-11 11:43 EST ------- This builds OK (although the output is crazy verbose); rpmlint says: mono-nunit22.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT with acknowledgement rpmlint is a bit behind here. mono-nunit22.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-nunit22.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These are normal for mono packages. mono-nunit22-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package Indeed, the debuginfo package seems to be completely empty. Probably best to disable it. mono-nunit22-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation That's OK; it's just a .pc file. I'm going to trust your evaluation of the license so that I don't have to open a damn rtf viewer. The world is just full of idiocy, it seems. So the only issue is the empty debuginfo package; I'll approve this and you can disable it when you check in. * source files match upstream: 181ed056855cb8490d3ef5d0763d7a7a90c44402b7dcbb4a3341f80dbb75b9d4 NUnit-2.2.10-src.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X debuginfo package is busted. X rpmlint has a valid complaint about the debuginfo package. * final provides and requires are sane: mono-nunit22-2.2.10-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm mono(nunit-console) = 0.0.0.0 mono(nunit-console-runner) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.core) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.core.extensions) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.framework) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.mocks) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.util) = 2.2.10.0 mono-nunit22 = 2.2.10-1.fc9 = mono(System) = 2.0.0.0 mono(System.Xml) = 2.0.0.0 mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.0.0 mono(nunit-console-runner) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.core) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.framework) = 2.2.10.0 mono(nunit.util) = 2.2.10.0 mono-nunit22-devel-2.2.10-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm mono-nunit22-devel = 2.2.10-1.fc9 = mono-nunit22 = 2.2.10-1.fc9 pkgconfig * %check is not present. I there are tests, but they're run at build time. At least that's what it looks like the build-tests targets are doing. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * pkgconfig file is (alone) in the -devel package. APPROVED; just disable the debuginfo package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111541.m3BFfBML005815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-11 11:41 EST ------- Downgrading to gcc34 requires turning off several options such as the stack protector. Um. Not sure that's desirable. The best option is to have a compat-gcc41, seeing as a lot of these problems are due to the extra-strictness of GCC 4.3. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111543.m3BFhPJK006081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-11 11:43 EST ------- for kicks i tried building in mock on rawhide checking if C symbols get an underscore after compilation... no checking if start is defined by the compiler... no checking if _start is defined by the compiler... no configure: error: neither start nor _start is defined Seems horribly broken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442057] Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111550.m3BFo2qA012628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 11:50 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-nunit22 Short Description: Unit-testing framework for .NET Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440560] Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111553.m3BFrO9P013090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openssl098b - The OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440560 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-04-11 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Downgrading to gcc34 requires turning off several options such as the stack > protector. Um. Not sure that's desirable. But openssl098b as a compat library should be used only by third party software anyway so I don't see it as a critical problem. > The best option is to have a compat-gcc41, seeing as a lot of these problems are > due to the extra-strictness of GCC 4.3. What do you think? This is a question for someone else (jakub as he is the gcc maintainer perhaps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 15:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442057] Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111554.m3BFsmDT008342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 11:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 17:03:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442057] Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111703.m3BH34UT022198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-nunit22 - Unit-testing framework for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442057 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 13:03 EST ------- Built for all branches, thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 17:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111713.m3BHDWZG023985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-11 13:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swing-layout Short Description: Swing Layout Extensions Owners: jtulach at netbeans.org Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: jtulach at netbeans.org Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 17:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111733.m3BHXdT2000856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-11 13:33 EST ------- This one builds OK but needs a couple of fixes: mono-ndoc.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-ndoc.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib The usual mono complaints. mono-ndoc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package Will need disabling. mono-ndoc-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mono-ndoc-devel-1.3.1/sdk/ndoc_msdn_temp/tree.css mono-ndoc-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mono-ndoc-devel-1.3.1/sdk/ndoc_msdn_temp/tree.js mono-ndoc-devel.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mono-ndoc-devel-1.3.1/sdk/ndoc_msdn_temp/tree.js mono-ndoc-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mono-ndoc-devel-1.3.1/sdk/ndoc_msdn_temp/MSDN.css I guess these aren't intended to be displayed, but we generally fix up html files so I don't really see a reason not to fix these up as well. Full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 17:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111736.m3BHaJXC001617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mono-ndoc - |Review Request: mono-ndoc - |Code Documentation Generator|Code Documentation Generator |for .NE |for .NET -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 17:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111745.m3BHjeNS003399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 13:45 EST ------- Points addressed: New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-ndoc.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-ndoc-1.3.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 18:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111821.m3BILUn5005405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-11 14:21 EST ------- Ok, but AFAIK GCJ is not a must have but a "nice to have". There is this draft: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ConditionalGCJ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 18:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355581] Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111830.m3BIUC5m012691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Alias: koules-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355581 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-11 14:30 EST ------- Package change Request ======================= Package Name: koules New Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 18:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111838.m3BIcqIi008590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dbhole at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 18:38:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111838.m3BIc8M6008470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-11 14:38 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302154) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302154&action=view) specfile patch to remove gcj bits Here's the full review done by Deepak Bhole and myself. It's largely fine. Thanks for the submission. For now, see the lines beginning with an "X" and the notes section at the bottom. MUST: * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this? * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} X verify source and patches - md5sums match. see notes section for comments on patches * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} used properly * license text included in package and marked with %doc * packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * rpmlint on .srpm gives no output * changelog fine * Packager tag should not be used * Vendor tag should not be used * Distribution tag should not be used * use License and not Copyright * Summary tag should not end in a period * if possible, replace PreReq with Requires(pre) and/or Requires(post) X specfile is legible - I'd rather see common_reqs split out and enumerated in both Requires and BuildRequires * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * BuildRequires are proper * summary should be a short and concise description of the package * description expands upon summary * make sure lines are <= 80 characters - some code lines longer; okay * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * no static libraries * no rpath * config files should usually be marked with %config(noreplace) * GUI apps should contain .desktop files * should the package contain a -devel sub-package? - nope * use macros appropriately and consistently * don't use %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * locale data handling correct (find_lang) X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps - please use cp -pR in %install * split Requires(pre,post) into two separate lines * package contains code * %files okay * %clean should be present * %doc files should not affect runtime X verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs - the -javadoc package should depend upon jpackage-utils (which owns %{_javadocdir} ... yes, this should probably be in the guidelines :) [localhost:SPECS]$ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/opengrok-0.6-9.hg275.fc9.noarch.rpm config(opengrok) = 0.6-9.hg275.fc9 opengrok = 0.6-9.hg275.fc9 [localhost:SPECS]$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/opengrok-0.6-9.hg275.fc9.noarch.rpm /bin/sh ant bcel config(opengrok) = 0.6-9.hg275.fc9 ctags jakarta-oro java javacc jpackage-utils lucene > 2 lucene-contrib > 2 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 servlet swing-layout [localhost:SPECS]$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/opengrok-javadoc-0.6-9.hg275.fc9.noarch.rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [localhost:SPECS]$ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/opengrok-javadoc-0.6-9.hg275.fc9.noarch.rpm opengrok-javadoc = 0.6-9.hg275.fc9 * run rpmlint on the binary RPMs $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/opengrok-0.6-9.hg275.fc9.noarch.rpm opengrok.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/java/opengrok-0.6.jar - this is fine SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 ? package should build in mock - I didn't try Notes: - don't build with gcj at all because of this missing bit: [javac] import java.util.Scanner; [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [javac] The import java.util.Scanner cannot be resolved - remove gcj bits as the diff I'm attaching does - re-name patches to match version (0.5 -> 0.6) - for now, remove the tomcat package as we don't have guidelines -- or even best practices -- for this - why don't you build a jrcs package and Require/BR it? - please comment the patches that don't have comments in them - why the big patch between 0.6 and this hg snapshot? if that's actually required, why not just use an hg snapshot tarball as SOURCE0 instead of 0.6 and patching? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 18:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111839.m3BIdiXV014404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-11 14:39 EST ------- rpmlint output is down to: mono-ndoc.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-ndoc.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib both of which are OK. Everything looks good to me. * source files match upstream: f587a11ff2b726347028faee8e1db654d1544cbdc8d37be593f0560ec8b60256 ndoc-devel-v1.3.1.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: mono-ndoc-1.3.1-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm mono(NDoc.Core) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Documenter.JavaDoc) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Documenter.Latex) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Documenter.LinearHtml) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Documenter.Msdn) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Documenter.Msdn2) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Documenter.Xml) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.ExtendedUI) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.Test) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.VisualStudio) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDocConsole) = 1.3.3023.0 mono-ndoc = 1.3.1-2.fc9 = mono(NDoc.Core) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(NDoc.ExtendedUI) = 1.3.3023.0 mono(System) = 1.0.5000.0 mono(System.Drawing) = 1.0.5000.0 mono(System.Windows.Forms) = 1.0.5000.0 mono(System.Xml) = 1.0.5000.0 mono(mscorlib) = 1.0.5000.0 mono-ndoc-devel-1.3.1-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm mono-ndoc-devel = 1.3.1-2.fc9 = mono-ndoc = 1.3.1-2.fc9 pkgconfig * %check is not present. As far as I can tell, tests are run at build time. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is all in the -devel package. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 19:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111911.m3BJBLZS015566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-04-11 15:11 EST ------- Everything seems to be ok except one thing. This package doesn't build on F9. Here's a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=562640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 19:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226354] Merge Review: radvd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111919.m3BJJRdK023081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: radvd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226354 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From mnagy at redhat.com 2008-04-11 15:19 EST ------- ping: Martin, shouldn't this bug be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 19:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111942.m3BJgGfO021748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 jeff at ocjtech.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ocjtech.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2008-04-11 15:42 EST ------- I haven't tried bip out yet, but version 0.7.2 of bip is out... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 19:52:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804111952.m3BJqEJM023805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 15:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-ndoc Short Description: Code Documentation Generator for .NET Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 20:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112003.m3BK3XlN032156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 16:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 20:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442056] Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112012.m3BKCei6028599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-ndoc - Code Documentation Generator for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442056 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-11 16:12 EST ------- Thanks for the review, its built everywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 20:12:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112012.m3BKCTQp028550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-04-11 16:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ezstream Short Description: Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers Owners: ianweller Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 21:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112107.m3BL7sZe013804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-11 17:07 EST ------- I'd be very thiankful if you could request and maintain a EPEL-5 branch for this package. In case you don't want or can't do that, let me know and I'll do that. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 21:06:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112106.m3BL6hVZ008100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-11 17:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: hydrogen Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 21:14:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112114.m3BLErnR009571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-11 17:14 EST ------- I'd be very thankful if you could request and maintain a EPEL-5 branch for this package. In case you don't want or can't do that, let me know and I'll do that. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 22:09:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112209.m3BM9WDu025529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-11 18:09 EST ------- Why hasn't this been built for F-9? It's causing dependency issues: Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- fedora-ds-dsgw-1.1.0-1.fc9.i386 requires /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/httpd.conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 22:11:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112211.m3BMBYdm021023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-11 18:11 EST ------- Right, but right now it won't build *at all* on ppc{,64}. Neither java-1.6.0-openjdk nor gcj will build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 22:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112252.m3BMqljE000645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2008-04-11 18:52 EST ------- SPEC URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/python-mpd/python-mpd.spec SRPM URL: http://ecik.fedorapeople.org/python-mpd/python-mpd-0.2.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Egg-info issue now fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 23:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436707] Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112327.m3BNROtg006783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biloba - A tactical board game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436707 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-04-11 19:27 EST ------- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 23:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112329.m3BNTZ6m007035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-11 19:29 EST ------- Weird - I thought it already was in F-9. It's now built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 11 23:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804112344.m3BNisJv004228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 rafalzaq at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rafalzaq at gmail.com 2008-04-11 19:44 EST ------- * Source0 match upstream (17632bc9a23c5e393a17e06bae6305f7) * license ok * package builds in mock (koji scratch build) * %files fine * rpmlint is silent * %clean section present * latest version being packaged * license text included as %doc * BRs fine Everything seems to be ok so this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 00:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435829] Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120000.m3C00x7q012775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tomcat6 - Apache Servlet/JSP Engine, RI for Servlet 2.5/JSP 2.1 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435829 dwalluck at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-04-11 20:00 EST ------- The package tomcat6-6.0.16-1jpp.7.fc9 is currently in rawhide (F9 branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 01:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120126.m3C1QbEp021599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-11 21:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Whoops. I did cvs before finishing the review. :/ > > Here's the new spec file, does it look ok? > > http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-cecil-flowanalysis.spec I hadn't noticed that the source contained a .pc pkgconfig file earlier, so well spotted. It looks to be correctly packaged in the separate -devel subpackage as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono So, looks fine. APPROVED. I've also re-raised the fedora-cvs flag to save some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 01:56:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120156.m3C1uruZ031243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-04-11 21:56 EST ------- David, given your recent decision to leave the project (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg00883.html), I believe it is safe to mark this review as dead. Please don't hesitate to re-open with further comments if you feel otherwise. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 03:19:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120319.m3C3Jf86014605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 03:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120325.m3C3PoFo011137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-11 23:25 EST ------- I am moving away from this review now. Praveen, you better look for some one from existing fedora community to get this package in F10 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 04:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439142] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120453.m3C4rq2I025366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439142 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-12 00:53 EST ------- is this built? IF yes then we can CLOSE this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 07:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120718.m3C7IADe016644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 07:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120717.m3C7Hc5N016588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 09:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120914.m3C9Eetc009215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-12 05:14 EST ------- Typo in changelog - s/Xvaier/Xavier/g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 09:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224458] Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120923.m3C9Nfel010782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsilc (dependency of gaim) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224458 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-12 05:23 EST ------- Should we close this Review Request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 09:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804120949.m3C9nR5P015443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-12 05:49 EST ------- Okay, now I should be sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki page again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 10:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121026.m3CAQAFk021787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2008-04-12 06:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-mpd Short Description: Python MPD client library Owners: ecik Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 10:33:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121033.m3CAXLdF022732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 10:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228960] Review Request: java-1.5.0-gcj - JPackage compatibility layer for GCJ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121035.m3CAZrci023384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.5.0-gcj - JPackage compatibility layer for GCJ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228960 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-12 06:35 EST ------- OK, closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 10:46:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 06:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121046.m3CAkxwS025166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-12 06:46 EST ------- Sorry for delay.... For 1.8.3-6 * About License tag - (BSD) license used in this tarball is what we call "BSD with advertising", which is _incompatible_ with (any version of) GPL and using "BSD with advertising"-only licensed codes cannot used for this package. Fortunately the only problematic codes are bsd/swapinternal.{h,cc} and they are not used for xosview. So: - Please change the license tag to "GPL+" (GPL at any version) - Don't add COPYING.BSD to %doc. * Using CVS - If you want to use CVS: * Please follow the section "Using Revision Control" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * and also follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages * Desktop file Category - The Category "Application" in desktop files are now deprecated and should be removed. * Macros - Please replace: %_prefix/bin -> %_bindir %_prefix/share/man -> %_mandir Well, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 11:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121118.m3CBIkju030429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-12 07:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Typo in changelog - s/Xvaier/Xavier/g Thx Peter, will fix during review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 11:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121124.m3CBOifv027131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-12 07:24 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 11:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121133.m3CBXAcR000485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-12 07:33 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 11:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121135.m3CBZUv2029202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From arbiter at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-12 07:35 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/network/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/bip-0.7.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Bumped to the new version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 12:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430399] Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121201.m3CC1Dno001572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430399 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-12 08:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kstart Short Description: Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 Owners: sxw Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 12:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121202.m3CC2SX6001865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-12 08:02 EST ------- The src.rpm is not found? Regarding the version in spec file name, I understand it and it is right as long as the spec file in the src.rpm hasn't the version. Reading the spec file, it is indeed possible to use the provided install the documentation files should have %doc in front. I suggest using %{_mandir}/man1/xmds.1* instead of %{_mandir}/man1/xmds.1.* For the documentation, in fact if the .pdf is covered by the GPL, then you should also provide the .tex somewhere, otherwise it cannot be covered by the GPL. It can also be provided separately as a pdf file, but the source should be available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 12:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121224.m3CCOTKE006395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 12:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121229.m3CCTR9L011100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-12 08:29 EST ------- The Source should be the url leading to the real file, like Source0: http://www.vergenet.net/~conrad/software/xsel/download/xsel-%{version}.tar.gz Also the Url should better be like: Url: http://www.vergenet.net/~conrad/software/xsel/ which leads to the package home page and description. License looks like MIT (old style), looking at the web page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT For packaged releases (unlike snapshots), you shouldn't have the BuildRequires libtool, autoamke and autoconf (you can simply comment them out in case using svn snapshots is often useful for that package). The requires for the Xserver is certainly wrong, unless this program requires a real X server and not the X abstraction (like the one provided by the ssh X redirection or vnc, or a real X server). You should use the rpm macro %configure instead of doing it yourself. The make call that does the compilation should be done in the %build and not in %install. You should remove the package name from the summary, all the tools should use the name if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 12:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121232.m3CCWqsE007925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-12 08:32 EST ------- Not full review yet but first thing I noticed that it doesn't build on F-8 even with all BuildRequires installed: + rm -rf src/lib/ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib.dll src/lib/ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib.pdb src/lib/ext + rm -rf src/tools/nant/linux/ICSharpCode.SharpCvsLib.dll src/tools/nant/linux/ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.Contrib.Tasks.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.Core.Tests.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.Core.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.DotNet.Tests.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.DotNetTasks.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.NUnit.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.NUnit1Tasks.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.NUnit2Tasks.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.SourceControlTasks.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.Tests.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.Zip.Tests.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.ZipTasks.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.exe src/tools/nant/linux/NAnt.exe.config src/tools/nant/linux/NDoc.Core.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NDoc.Documenter.Msdn.dll src/tools/nant/linux/NUnitCore.dll src/tools/nant/linux/README.txt src/tools/nant/linux/log4net.dll src/tools/nant/linux/nunit.framework.dll + mkdir -p src/lib/ext/ + cp /usr/lib/mono/log4net/log4net.dll src/lib/ext/ + cp /usr/lib/mono/2.0/ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib.dll src/lib/ + cp /usr/lib/mono/2.0/nunit.framework.dll src/lib/ext/ cp: cannot stat `/usr/lib/mono/2.0/nunit.framework.dll': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.23525 (%prep) Secondly about to build on F-9 using koji, but first need to add ppc to ExcludeArch because no nant on ppc currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 12:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 08:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439142] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121246.m3CCk9LD010517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-LDAP - LDAP model class for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439142 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-12 08:46 EST ------- Sorry, life got in the way. Now built with TEST_POD=1 Will push to F-9 as an update once the release happens. Thanks, everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 13:01:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121301.m3CD1aKL013286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-12 09:01 EST ------- Full review: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines: YES - Spec file matches base package name: YES - Spec has consistant macro usage: YES - Meets Packaging Guidelines.: YES - License: GPLv2+ with exception - License field in spec matches: YES - License file included in package: YES - Spec in American English: YES - Spec is legible.: YES - Sources match upstream md5sum: no, because source needed to be rezipped because of Windows separators: md5sum SharpCvsLib-0.35.3721.507-src-unix.zip SharpCvsLib-0.35.3721.507-src.zip e480d341ff54298ddae2acbedf03d00b SharpCvsLib-0.35.3721.507-src-unix.zip 968c3ee0333da891ee8f52e30e6b526e /tmp/SharpCvsLib-0.35.3721.507-src.zip - Package needs ExcludeArch: ppc and ppc64 (no nant on those platforms) - BuildRequires correct: N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang: N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. YES - Package has a correct %clean section. YES - Package has correct buildroot %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - Package is code or permissible content.: YES - Doc subpackage needed/used. N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.: YES - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. Only .pc file - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun: N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig: YES - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} YES - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file: N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch., YES, only rawhide/F-9, koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=563289 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. YES - Package owns all the directories it creates. YES - No rpmlint output.: Some output, which is acceptable according to Mono packaging guidelines: rpmlint mono-sharpcvslib-* mono-sharpcvslib.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-sharpcvslib.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - final provides and requires are sane: YES Provides: mono(ICSharpCode.SharpCvsLib) = 0.35.3721.507 mono(ICSharpCode.SharpCvsLib.Tests) = 0.0.0.0 mono(ICSharpCode.SharpCvsLib.Tests-sample) = 0.0.0.0 mono(cvs) = 0.35.3721.507 mono-sharpcvslib = 0.35-1.fc9 Requires: mono(ICSharpCode.SharpCvsLib) = 0.35.3721.507 mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 2.84.0.0 mono(System) = 2.0.0.0 mono(System.Configuration) = 2.0.0.0 mono(System.EnterpriseServices) = 2.0.0.0 mono(System.Xml) = 2.0.0.0 mono(log4net) = 1.2.10.0 mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.0.0 mono(nunit.framework) = 2.2.0.0 SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. YES - Should build on all supported archs: YES only i386 and x86_64 currently (see koji build above) - Should function as described. NOT TESTED - Should have sane scriptlets. YES - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. YES - Should have dist tag: YES - Should package latest version: It looks like 0.35 is the latest stable version but it's from 2005, there is a "dev" version from 2005. Does it fix any outstanding issues with 0.35? Issues: 1. Add ppc to ExcludeArch 2. See if BR's can be adjusted to build on F-8 3. nant currently provides mono(cvs) which it shouldn't, I assume that this package will replace that requirement? Only 1) is a blocker, 2) would be nice, but not critical for approval, since this is necessary to get the nant/mono stack in a sane condition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 13:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121317.m3CDHjVh016404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-12 09:17 EST ------- Minor point, the spec file uses "c#" and "C#" in the Summary and Descriptions. I think the standard is "C#" capitalised. Can these be fixed too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 14:12:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121412.m3CEC4YV026597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-12 10:12 EST ------- Be sure to send a message to rel-eng at fedoraproject.org to tag for F-9 since we're in freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 14:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121430.m3CEUv2Q001179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |overholt at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-12 10:30 EST ------- Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #9) > X specfile is legible > - I'd rather see common_reqs split out and enumerated in both Requires and > BuildRequires I thought this will save me from some errors and work when adding common requires, but it's just a matter of personal taste. If you both think it doesn't look well, I'll split it. > X consider using cp -p to preserve timestamps > - please use cp -pR in %install Done. Also install -p. I was thinking about preserving all timestamps before, but some are virtually impossible -- such as manual page, which gets generated from the java code on the fly. We're not in risk of multiarch conflicts here (now without gcj bit's we're even noarch), so I guess that's not necessary. > X verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > > - the -javadoc package should depend upon jpackage-utils (which owns > %{_javadocdir} ... yes, this should probably be in the guidelines :) Fixed. > Notes: > > - don't build with gcj at all because of this missing bit: > > [javac] import java.util.Scanner; > [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > [javac] The import java.util.Scanner cannot be resolved > > - remove gcj bits as the diff I'm attaching does Applied. I wonder if it's right that this didn't break the build? > - re-name patches to match version (0.5 -> 0.6) I read somewhere, though I am not able to find the link now, that the version number in patch name is one the patch was created against, and doesn't change when it applies to newer upstream package. > - for now, remove the tomcat package as we don't have guidelines -- or even > best practices -- for this Done. > - why don't you build a jrcs package and Require/BR it? AFAIK this is a fork of jrcs from times when it was part of Apache Commons and is modified by OpenGrok developers. Currently development of jrcs development continues in the place it did before, and I am not aware of any effort to put OpenGrok modifications back there. > - please comment the patches that don't have comments in them Done (except for the hg diff, which is obvious, see below). > - why the big patch between 0.6 and this hg snapshot? if that's actually > required, why not just use an hg snapshot tarball as SOURCE0 instead of 0.6 > and patching? About the same reason kernel package does a thing like this. I updated the package with new revisions quite rapidly and it would not make much sense to waste space with new tarball until patch file has sane length. It can moreover be compressed. New package: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/opengrok-0.6-8.hg275.fc8.1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 14:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121452.m3CEqLwW001578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-12 10:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > for kicks i tried building in mock on rawhide > > checking if C symbols get an underscore after compilation... > no > checking if start is defined by the compiler... > no > checking if _start is defined by the compiler... > no > configure: error: neither start nor _start is defined I am not reproduce on Fedora 9/i386, nor Fedora 8/x86_64. Did you build on something else? Have complete build.log and root.log somewhere? > Seems horribly broken What does "horribly" stand here for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 15:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121522.m3CFMl4U010495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 11:22 EST ------- cvs is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 15:22:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121522.m3CFM4fQ010390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 11:22 EST ------- Sure. All items fixed (the "dev" version doesn't fix any outstanding issues that I can see): New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-sharpcvslib-0.35-2.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/mono-sharpcvslib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 15:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121558.m3CFwAB6016777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-12 11:58 EST ------- Oh, this is that on x86_64, 32 bit glibc devel that provides crt1.o is not buildrequired. Add this BuildRequires: /usr/lib/crt1.o to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 18:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121806.m3CI6SsJ007025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-12 14:06 EST ------- Okay, seems good from a very quick check. I will look closely later. By the way, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 18:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228255] Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804121825.m3CIPJBR010580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grub2 - The GRand Unified Bootloader 2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228255 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-12 14:25 EST ------- http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/grub2.spec http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/grub2-1.96-2.fc8.x86_64/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 20:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122041.m3CKfr7e031521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 16:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 20:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 316971] Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122044.m3CKiIvM002399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: centerim - Text mode menu- and window-driven IM Alias: centerim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316971 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 16:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 21:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439152] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122111.m3CLBMis007502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace - Display a stack trace on the Catalyst debug screen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439152 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-12 17:11 EST ------- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 21:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122145.m3CLjLda010020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 17:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 21:48:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355581] Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122148.m3CLmpQm013587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: koules - Action game with multiplayer, network and sound support Alias: koules-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355581 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 17:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 21:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430399] Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122153.m3CLrpAQ014654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430399 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 17:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 21:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122157.m3CLvoEW011908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 17:57 EST ------- try it now? Should be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:02:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122202.m3CM2bUl016392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 18:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122200.m3CM02MI015869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 18:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] New: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp-2.0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: TagLib# is a FREE and Open Source library for the .NET 2.0 and Mono frameworks which will let you tag your software with as much or as little detail as you like without slowing you down. It supports a large variety of movie and music formats which abstract away the work, handling all the different cases, so all you have to do is access file.Tag.Title, file.Tag.Lyrics, or my personal favorite file.Tag.Pictures. But don't think all this abstraction is gonna keep you from tagging's greatest gems. You can still get to a specific tag type's features with just a few lines of code. NOTE: We need this to bring Banshee up to spec in F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:10:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122210.m3CMA8Y8014438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 18:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442219] New: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442219 Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://192.168.2.2/~mcpierce/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://192.168.2.2/~mcpierce/bip-0.7.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Bip is an IRC proxy, which means it keeps connected to your preferred IRC servers, can store the logs for you, and even send them back to your IRC client(s) upon connection. You may want to use bip to keep your logfiles (in a unique format and on a unique computer) whatever your client is, when you connect from multiple workstations, or when you simply want to have a playback of what was said while you were away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122218.m3CMI8Y3019074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpierce at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-12 18:18 EST ------- *** Bug 442219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442219] Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122218.m3CMI7cH019045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442219 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-12 18:18 EST ------- my 192.168.2.2 is not the same as yours, is it? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 437694 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439157] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122232.m3CMWBGh021503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-JSON - JSON view for your Catalyst data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439157 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-12 18:32 EST ------- Chris: I've applied your patch to the F-7 and F-8 branches. Thanks everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441759] Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122246.m3CMkV7K023992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-cecil-flowanalysis - Flowanalysis engine for Cecil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441759 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 18:46 EST ------- Built, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:48:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441981] Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122248.m3CMm8Ad020435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441981 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 18:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441595] Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122252.m3CMq0xu024872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-mpd - Python MPD client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441595 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-12 18:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122252.m3CMqNMe021257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 22:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122255.m3CMtZbC025632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 18:55 EST ------- Please close this out once you've got builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122308.m3CN8MKo023954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 19:08 EST ------- OK, try: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp-2.0.3.0-2.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122331.m3CNVUCh031749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 19:31 EST ------- No, really, try: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp-2.0.3.0-3.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/taglib-sharp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:37:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122337.m3CNbknv000312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-12 19:37 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122341.m3CNf97u001000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 19:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-sharpcvslib Short Description: Client cvs library written in C# Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:44:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122344.m3CNiWu7030126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-12 19:44 EST ------- mediawiki-HNP-1.1.2-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:45:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122345.m3CNjWGj001809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 19:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 12 23:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804122345.m3CNjnUW030601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-12 19:45 EST ------- mediawiki-HNP-1.1.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 00:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130000.m3D00Mph000603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-12 20:00 EST ------- Package Review (taglib-sharp-2.0.3.0-2.fc9.src.rpm) ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: taglib-sharp.x86_64: E: no-binary taglib-sharp.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib taglib-sharp-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib --> false alarms [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:LGPLv2+ note: sources are a mix of different licenses but LGPLv2+ seems to be the common denominator [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 648a26d64df48e460e0a196b99bc706d11f726f0 taglib-sharp-2.0.3.0-3.fc9.src.rpm [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 00:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130002.m3D022be004576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-12 20:02 EST ------- obs: there is only one minor nitpick: pkgconfig gets pulled in by mono-devel which would count as an [indirect] duplicate BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 00:10:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130010.m3D0Ak2b006265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 20:10 EST ------- I'll fix that before I commit, thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: taglib-sharp Short Description: Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 00:17:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130017.m3D0HOEM007266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 20:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 00:16:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442055] Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130016.m3D0GgGl003603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-sharpcvslib - Client cvs library written in c# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442055 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 20:16 EST ------- Built in F-9 and devel (earlier mono is... unhappy). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 00:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130031.m3D0V18l009638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-12 20:31 EST ------- ezstream-0.5.3-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 01:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442218] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130126.m3D1QTVn015040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Provides tag reading and writing for Banshee and other Mono apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442218 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-12 21:26 EST ------- Built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 01:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130133.m3D1XMK7016017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 nospam at thenerdshow.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature, OtherQA ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-04-12 21:33 EST ------- New xsel rpm for version, 1.2.0 is available: http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xsel.spec http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xsel-1.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Other stuff, for the curious: http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/ %changelog * Sat Apr 12 2008 Henry Kroll - 1.2.0 - Version upgrade. Change license to MIT. Fix URL, Requires, BuildRequires. Change group to Applications/System re: xclip. Include keywords in the description to make it easier to find. I noticed another program, xclip, in the update repo that provides many of the same features as xsel. There are some important differences, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 03:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 23:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442233] New: Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Summary: Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davej at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://davej.fedorapeople.org/oprofileui.spec SRPM URL: http://davej.fedorapeople.org/oprofileui-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: alternative user interface to the default one provided by oprofile-gui with many additional features. See http://labs.o-hand.com/oprofileui/ for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 06:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130647.m3D6lKRe001646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-DBD-ODBC ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-13 02:47 EST ------- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=563988 Almost all tests are skipped. I'm not sure what can currently be done to enable them, aside from also packaging SQLiteODBC[1] and rigging a little test environment... I'd encourage this; we certainly already require (as a matter of course) the packaging of any additional cpan/perl deps required to fully enable a test suite. [1] http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/html/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 08:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130834.m3D8YJxg017473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-13 04:34 EST ------- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 08:58:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435576] Review Request: ncdu - Ncurses disk usage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130858.m3D8wcvS025657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncdu - Ncurses disk usage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435576 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-04-13 04:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302260) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302260&action=view) spec patch > Requires: ncurses Delete this. We rely on the automatic library SONAME dependencies which are added by rpmbuild. See "rpm --query --requires ..." of the binary rpm. > ./configure --prefix=%{_usr} --libdir=%{_libdir} Prefer the %configure macro, as it sets --prefix --libdir and other values. It also exports our global compiler flags (which are not built with when running ./configure). See "rpm --eval %configure" for details. > %doc %{_mandir}/man1/ncdu.1.gz Files in %_mandir are marked %doc automatically. > Summary: Ncurses disk usage I recommend a slightly more descriptive and less ambiguous summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 09:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130904.m3D94vWP026841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dialog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-13 05:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > It's only used in building dialog. The generated header > contains both symbols needed for building the program, > as well as symbols needed to make applications build with > the library. Can't those 2 sets be split apart? An API should be platform independent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 09:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130907.m3D97GKI023378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-04-13 05:07 EST ------- * Doesn't build with our global $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (or %optflags). Make sure you set CFLAGS in the Makefile, e.g. with a modification of the existing patch: --- makefile.patch~ 2008-03-08 19:41:21.000000000 +0100 +++ makefile.patch 2008-04-13 11:04:53.000000000 +0200 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ CPPFLAGS = -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -CFLAGS = -Wall -+CFLAGS = -Wall -g ++CFLAGS = -Wall $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) LDFLAGS = LIBS = -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 09:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130911.m3D9B7jB028285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-04-13 05:11 EST ------- Plus, prefer "install -p ..." whenever installing prebuilt files. That preserves the timestamps (and aids the package user in seeing the age of files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 09:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804130923.m3D9Ne9P026170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-04-13 05:23 EST ------- > %configure --disable-lynx \ > --prefix=%{_prefix} \ > --libdir=%{_libdir} \ > --mandir=%{_mandir} \ The last three args are the default. See "rpm --eval %configure". > %dir %{_libdir}/xmms/Output/libxmms-pulse.la Surely not a directory. It's a libtool archive file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 10:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442244] New: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/fotox.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/fotox-39-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Easy to use image editor with features like panoramas, high dynamic range (HDR) composites, change brightness distribution, intensify colors, reduce haze, resize, rotate (any angle), crop, red-eye removal, sharpen, reduce noise, thumbnail image browser and navigator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 10:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442219] Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131035.m3DAZ5iZ005655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442219 ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-04-13 06:35 EST ------- Sorry, my bad: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/bip-0.7.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 11:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226079] Merge Review: libxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131106.m3DB6b2H010858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226079 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-04-13 07:06 EST ------- > Prefix: %{_prefix} This is wrong. The packages are not really relocatable. For example, there are hardcoded paths in xml2-config, the pkgconfig file, the libtool archive, and xml2Conf.sh > %{prefix}/include/* > %{prefix}/bin/xml2-config > %{prefix}/share/aclocal/libxml.m4 It should be %{_bindir}, %{_includedir} and %{_datadir} everywhere. > Docdir: %{_docdir} Redundant. > -rw-r--r-- root root 1546914 /usr/lib/libxml2.a http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/StaticLibraryPolicy > %post > /sbin/ldconfig > %postun > /sbin/ldconfig Prefer %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig to execute ldconfig directly and not via /bin/sh > Patch0: multilib.patch It is common practise to prefix such files with the name (and preferably also the version) of the package, e.g. libxml2-2.6.32-multilib.patch > make If make %{_smp_mflags} causes problems, please add a comment. > %files devel > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.gz NEWS README Copyright TODO > %files python > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.gz NEWS README Copyright Is it necessary to duplicate these files? They are already in the main package, which is a strict requirement for these two sub-packages. * rpmlint gives lots of warnings when run on the binary rpms. Some are valid, e.g. "file-not-utf8" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 11:26:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131126.m3DBQltM013892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-04-13 07:26 EST ------- This package shouldn't have passed review as it has Requires: that aren't actually in Fedora, e.g. php-pear-Auth-OpenID which is still in review (bug #227190) Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- mediawiki-openid-0.7.0-5.noarch requires php-pear-Auth-OpenID mediawiki-openid-0.7.0-5.noarch requires php-pear-Services-Yadis see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20080413/logs/depcheck This should probably be blocked from F-9 until such time as the dependencies are fully packaged and available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 11:58:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 07:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442249] New: Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442249 Summary: Review Request: uniXM - standalong qt player for XMradio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/uniXM.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/uniXM-beta2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: standalone qt-based player for XMradio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:08:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131308.m3DD8xRA031917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-13 09:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302266) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302266&action=view) Install copy as symbolic links. Also add a patch for missing prototypes (unistd.h) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131306.m3DD6pPO031701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-13 09:06 EST ------- The copyright is a BSD (like FreeBSD BSD Variant (2 clause BSD) in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD with an additional sentence about it not being GPL. When upstream is missing in such cases, I think the best is to become upstream, like what was done for vixie-cron -> cronie. And I believe that the way to do that is to go through: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/ProjectHosting/RequestingNewProject -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131310.m3DDAip0032469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-13 09:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302267) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302267&action=view) add io.h in dos/win32, and unistd.h otherwise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131318.m3DDI2Oa001197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-13 09:18 EST ------- I have updated this package according to the newly approved guidelines. The spec and srpm are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-2.fc9.src.rpm Rpmlint on the source rpm is now silent. Rpmlint on the binary rpms gives the following output, which is the same as in my original post above: eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/brazil.jar /usr/share/java/brazil.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/brazil.jar /usr/share/java/brazil.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/jdom.jar /usr/share/java/jdom.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/jdom.jar /usr/share/java/jdom.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/antlr.jar /usr/share/java/antlr.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/antlr.jar /usr/share/java/antlr.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/gnu-regexp.jar /usr/share/java/gnu-regexp.jar eclipse-epic.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.epic.lib_0.6.0/lib/gnu-regexp.jar /usr/share/java/gnu-regexp.jar These are symlinks to libraries provided by other Fedora packages. I still believe these can safely be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131322.m3DDMxWt006429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-04-13 09:22 EST ------- Hi Claudio, here's a more thorough review: good: + rpmlint is silent + license is correctly included + specfile is legible and macros appear to be sane + source matches upstream sha1sum: b9bd87453b30696cbc175158c4a74b5db42ae126 octaviz-0.4.7.tar.gz b9bd87453b30696cbc175158c4a74b5db42ae126 octaviz-0.4.7.tar.gz.orig + builds in mock for F8 x86_64 + works (with some demo path issues below) when installed on F8 x86_64 + proper use of ldconfig + no duplicates in %files listing + no need for -devel + file permissions appear to be correct + spec has %clean and does "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' before install + no *.la + no need for %{name}.desktop since its an octave add-on needswork / suggestions: - According to the guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines octaviz is an addon package and should be named "octave-octaviz". I think this is a good idea but I don't consider it a "blocker" (that is, if you have good reasons to keep the name as-is then we can discuss/consider it). - license is GPLv2+ (please note the "+") per the COPYING and README files - VTK_DATA_ROOT should be set to %{_datadir}/vtkdata-5.0.4 not %{_datadir}/vtkdata-5.0.3 on F8 -- and perhaps this can be fixed more automatically within the spec-file using BuildRequires: vtkdata and then adding a macro such as $(find %{_datadir} -name vtkdata*) or similar logic - Should octaviz require vtkdata? I think it should since many of the octaviz demo scripts depend upon data (images) provided by vtkdata. The only downside to requiring it the ~20MB vtkdata download which is big-ish. So please don't consider this a blocker, its more of a judgment call. I think the package is in good shape and the remaining changes are pretty minor. Can you please comment on the above? Also, I'm willing to sponsor you if you'll demonstrate an ability to review packages by doing at least one "pre-review" as described above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442254] New: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442254 Summary: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sindrepb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/imapsync.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/imapsync-1.249-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The command imapsync is a tool allowing incremental and recursive imap transfer from one mailbox to another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 13:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442254] Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131331.m3DDV41Z007971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442254 sindrepb at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at kspei.com ------- Additional Comments From sindrepb at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-13 09:31 EST ------- Inital spec from Steven Pritchard. Silent rpmlint and builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 14:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441805] Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131425.m3DEPqcv017956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - Tool to migrate email between IMAP servers Alias: imapsync-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441805 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sindrepb at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-13 10:25 EST ------- *** Bug 442254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 14:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442254] Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131425.m3DEPpPC017922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: imapsync - IMAP synchronisation, sync, copy or migration tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442254 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-13 10:25 EST ------- Already in Fedora since a few days ago. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 441805 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 16:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] New: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/quicksynergy.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/quicksynergy-0.7-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: QuickSynergy is a graphical interface (GUI) for easily configuring Synergy2, an application that allows the user to share his mouse and keyboard between two or more computers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 16:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131622.m3DGMtep001005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-04-13 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) Hi, - Rewrote the SPEC using lib template - removed conditional builds http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-5.fc7.src.rpm http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442266] New: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/embryo.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/embryo-0.9.1.042-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Embryo is primarily a shared library that gives you an API to load and control interpreted programs compiled into an abstract machine bytecode that it understands. This abstract (or virtual) machine is similar to a real machine with a CPU, but it is emulated in software. The architecture is simple and is the same as the abstract machine (AMX) in the PAWN language (formerly called SMALL) as it is based on exactly the same code. Embryo has modified the code for the AMX extensively and has made it smaller and more portable. It is VERY small. The total size of the virtual machine code AND header files is less than 2500 lines of code. It includes the floating point library support by default as well. This makes it one of the smallest interpreters around, and thus makes is very efficient to use in code. RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to build software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131703.m3DH3rx8012135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] New: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-0.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LXSession is a standard-compliant X11 session manager with shutdown/reboot/suspend support via HAL and gdm. It is derived from XSM and is developed as default X11 session manager of LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. Though being part of LXDE, it's totally desktop-independent and only has few dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] New: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common-0.3.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the default artwork and configuration files for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:07:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] New: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxappearance.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxappearance-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LXAppearance is a new GTK+ theme switcher developed for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. It is able to change GTK+ themes, icon themes, and fonts used by applications. All changes done by the users can be seen immediately in the preview area. After clicking the "Apply" button, the settings will be written to gtkrc, and all running programs will be asked to reload their themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131712.m3DHCsu8010106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|442269 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131712.m3DHCtMI010134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|442270 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131712.m3DHCId6010027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442270 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131712.m3DHCIdD010051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442270 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131713.m3DHDZmK010216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-13 13:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=563988 > > Almost all tests are skipped. I'm not sure what can currently be done to enable > them, aside from also packaging SQLiteODBC[1] and rigging a little test > environment... I'd encourage this; we certainly already require (as a matter of > course) the packaging of any additional cpan/perl deps required to fully enable > a test suite. > > [1] http://www.ch-werner.de/sqliteodbc/html/ Thanks for the suggestion Chris. I've packaged sqliteodbc and will submit it for review once perl-DBD-ODBC is properly modified to use it. http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/sqliteodbc.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/sqliteodbc-0.77-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131722.m3DHMest011910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-13 13:22 EST ------- Woops, forgot to include: i386 and x86_64 RPMs built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131738.m3DHcgg7018511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2008-04-13 13:38 EST ------- 'Requires(Pre): setup' in filesystem is necessary because filesystem ships objects owned by non-root users. These users are defined in /etc/passwd provided by 'setup'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 17:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131750.m3DHobjq020797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu 2008-04-13 13:50 EST ------- pyPdf imported into CVS, builds well (and should be pushed to F-8 soon, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/pyPdf-1.10-4.fc8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 18:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131852.m3DIqhJO031453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 18:54:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131854.m3DIsZFb027498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-13 14:54 EST ------- RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/ msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to built software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 18:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] New: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/evas.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/evas-0.9.9.042-1.fc9.src.rpm i386 and x86_64 RPMs built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/ Description: Evas is a clean display canvas API for several target display systems that can draw anti-aliased text, smooth super and sub-sampled scaled images, alpha-blend objects much and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 18:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131859.m3DIxMDg028322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-13 14:59 EST ------- Woops, i should double-check what i'm pasting ;) RPMLint gives warning on evas-directfb and evas-gl: W: no-documentation But i think it's ok, because these packages contain only one .so file and are split out just to make base evas package less dependant on various stuff like directfb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 19:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131904.m3DJ4uNA001053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |441965 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 19:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131904.m3DJ4va8001079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442276 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 19:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] New: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel-2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Squirrel is a high level imperative/OO programming language, designed to be a powerful scripting tool that fits in the size, memory bandwidth, and real-time requirements of applications like games. output from rpmlint: squirrel-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on squirrel can be ignored as -devel depends on -libs scratch build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 19:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804131929.m3DJTA8v001221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From arbiter at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-13 15:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/network/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/bip-0.7.2-2.fc8.src.rpm * Sun Apr 13 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.7.2-2 - Added AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, INSTALL, README, TODO to docdir - added --enable-ssl to %configure, just to make sure that bip is built with SSL support using OpenSSL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 20:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132003.m3DK3V2D011289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-13 16:03 EST ------- I've updated this package according to the newly approved Java guidelines. The spec also now builds a demo rpm containing sample brazil projects. The spec and srpm are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/brazil.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/brazil-2.3-2.fc9.src.rpm Rpmlint is now silent on all packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 20:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132041.m3DKfcfv018025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-13 16:41 EST ------- Hello; not to press anyone, but I see the situation is blocked. Is there any other problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 20:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132046.m3DKkSSJ014955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-13 16:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Hello; not to press anyone, but I see the situation is blocked. Is there any > other problem? > Nope, I'm / we are waiting for Michel, the submitter and future maintainer of the Falcon package for Fedora. ping Michel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 20:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132052.m3DKqNBd015962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-13 16:52 EST ------- Some small comments: o add -p to install to preserve timestamps o find has a nice option -delete: find ..... -exec rm -f {} ';' -> find ..... -delete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 21:38:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440680] Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132138.m3DLcbMr027467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 21:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132138.m3DLcdTR027494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 Bug 440681 depends on bug 440680, which changed state. Bug 440680 Summary: Review Request: lua-logging - A simple API to use logging features in Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440680 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 21:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132143.m3DLhHwj028339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-13 17:43 EST ------- Thank you very much for your notes. Fixed these two bugs in this package, and also in embryo and evas (also submitted for review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 21:41:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132141.m3DLfArn028195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 tim at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 21:40:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440681] Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132140.m3DLec67028150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: luadoc - Documentation Generator Tool for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440681 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-04-13 17:40 EST ------- I have added an explicit provide "lua = 5.1" to the lua package. This way add-ons can depend on the exact base version that is required to have the proper package paths in place. This way we also do not have to have something like "lua >= 5.1; lua <= 5.2" which looks hackish. Since in the Lua world the base version is anyway what is looked at we should be fine with this solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 22:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442219] Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132210.m3DMAPdW000858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC proxy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442219 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-13 18:10 EST ------- Darryl, bip has already been submitted for review, see bug #437694 maybe you should try to review that one, or even offer to become co-maintainer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 22:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132217.m3DMHW9M001901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-13 18:17 EST ------- Please do not package INSTALL. It is only useful for people building from source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 22:47:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132247.m3DMlJ3W003116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session Alias: x11vnc-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-13 18:47 EST ------- Now I am sure. Using %setup -q find . -name minilzo\* -exec rm -f {} \; makes the build fail. BTW, you have to replace %configure --with-system-libvncserver=%{_libdir} with %configure --with-system-libvncserver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 23:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132311.m3DNBinF007327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-04-13 19:11 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564701 I don't see any issue? Sorry my computer died and I'm now using my laptop instead of my other box. Well PSU died and I haven't fixed it as of yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 13 23:13:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804132313.m3DNDiEv007479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-13 19:13 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm-0.13.2d-36.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Apr 14 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 0.13.2d-36 - Fix URL - Cherry pick changes made by TeXLive 2007 - Build dvi and pdf docs - Add Requires for tex(tex) - Add security fix patches for temp file creation As well as dealing with all of the comments you (Patrice) raised, I carefully audited the changes between texlive 2007's version of dvipdfm (which is derived from dvipdfm 0.13.2c) and upstream 0.13.2c and 0.13.2d, and applied what I think are the few necessary changes to the packaged version (0.13.2d). I also reviewed all related patches from Jindrich's texlive package (I hope i didn't miss any). (In reply to comment #1) > The base page is > http://gaspra.kettering.edu/dvipdfm/ > you used the dvipdfmx one... > Fixed. > There is a security issue in dvipdft since it generates files in tmp > with predictible names. In texlive dvipdfm the script comes from another > place and is furthermore patched. > Fixed. > A dot is missing at the end of %description. > Fixed. > the doc shipped should be the dvi version or even better the pdf > version. > > To have the dvi, you should have a > > BuildRequires: tex(tex) > > and during build do something along > pushd doc > tex dvipdfm > popd > Fixed. > and add > %docs doc/dvipdfm.dvi > > To have a pdf it is less obvious since the preferred way seems to > be using dvipdfm itself, but since it is not installed it is not obvious > that it will succeed. You can try anyway > > pushd doc > tex dvipdfm > ../dvipdfm dvipdfm > popd > and verify that it builds in mock, with an updated texlive that doesn't > contain the dvipdfm files that should be in dvipdfm. Fixed and works. > Last issue regards the differences between config files and corresponding > map files. > > Differences are: > D "zcat -f %i | gs -q -sPAPERSIZE=a0 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dCompatibilityLevel=1.2 > -dUseFlateCompression=true -sOutputFile=%o - -c quit" > > versus (-dSAFER added in texlive): > > D "zcat -f %i | gs -q -sPAPERSIZE=a0 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dCompatibilityLevel=1.2 > -dUseFlateCompression=true -dSAFER -sOutputFile=%o - -c quit" > > > a4 in texlive > -p letter > +p a4 > Fixed - now packaging the texlive config (with the original config shipped as a doc as it contains helpful commentary). > The maps are, in dvipdfm the shipped maps: > f cmr.map > f psbase14.map > f lw35urw.map > I still include these, but they're not used. > In texlive, the font map created by updmap (and another map) are used: > f cm-dvipdfm-fix.map > f dvipdfm.map > yes - the texlive config file will ensure these are used, I believe. > > It seems to me that the dvipdfm config file in texlive is better, but I am > far from being an expert in this matter. > Yes, I think so too. > > > It seems to me that the config file in texlive-texmf can be kept > instead of using the one in dvipdfm. The map and enc files of dvipdfm > should still be shipped, though unused in the default fedora config. > Agreed. > A Requires: tex(tex) is also certainly missing, I don't think that > dvipdfm will be ok without fonts. These fonts should be brought in > by kpathsea, but I think that it is better not to count on it. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 00:04:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140004.m3E04jk3019619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-04-13 20:04 EST ------- Oops! I posted the wrong spec file. It also had the wrong source package, license and group! Here is the correct one, now revision 2 to avoid confusion: http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xmms-pulse.spec http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xmms-pulse-0.9.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 00:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140056.m3E0u8RN025054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-13 20:56 EST ------- LingNing, could you please update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 01:51:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442295] New: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/thunar-shares.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/thunar-shares-0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba. The backend is based on nautilus-share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 02:05:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439163] Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140205.m3E25NZj008666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439163 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(simon at sxw.org.uk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 02:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439240] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140205.m3E25gf9008719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache Alias: perl-Cache-FastMmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439240 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(simon at sxw.org.uk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 02:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140210.m3E2AbVF005992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-04-13 22:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302296) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302296&action=view) COPYING VOSTROM Public License for Open Source Copyright (c) 2007 VOSTROM Holdings, Inc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 02:09:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] New: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: TBD SRPM URL: TBD Description: lft - display the route packets take to a network host/socket using one of several layer-4 protocols and methods; optionally show heuristic network information in transit whob - display whois-type information of interest to Internet operators blocking FE-LEGAL for review of the license, as it's not listed on OSI or FSF's lists of acceptable licenses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 02:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140210.m3E2AwRj006142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: lft - Layer |Review Request: lft - Layer |Four Traceroute |Four Traceroute -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 02:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] New: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: A Python interface to the GtkExtra2 widget set for GTK2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 04:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140417.m3E4HxIw029822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lizhang at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 04:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140439.m3E4dp48004409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-14 00:39 EST ------- Added missing BR on python-setuptools: Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-sphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/python/python-sphinx-0.1.61950-1.fc9.src.rpm Koji build (F-9): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 05:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140540.m3E5e2sO012516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-14 01:40 EST ------- Well the version number is a little funny: dunno if they really mean 0.4, but maybe it is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 05:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140538.m3E5cUaf012051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-14 01:38 EST ------- Thanks. The install directory should be just %fontsdir: ie please remove the "-fonts" suffix from the dir in %install and %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140602.m3E62t2a019785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From pravi.a at ippimail.com 2008-04-14 02:02 EST ------- Parag, we were looking upto F9 as a perfect solution for all Malayalam issues and even after doing al the necessary steps from our side, this response is really disappointing. It looks like Fedora does not care for our language and I'm moving on. Now I don't care what happens with Fedora - it is disappointing, but it is not the only distro available. There are others like debian who care for our language and are responsible to our comments and requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140608.m3E68K4n017471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:08 EST ------- Putting a comment about the shared dir in the spec file would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:11:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140611.m3E6BbdB018279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol Alias: stun-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:11 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140617.m3E6Hp6D019314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:17 EST ------- The sponsorship process does have a single point failure. One person stepping away from a package review does not prevent you getting sponsored or getting a package into Fedora. There are hundreds of packages waiting on review/sponsorship currently and does not reflect anything specific about this one. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored details the process and has a list of sponsors you can get in touch with. Ask in #fedora-devel or post to fedora fonts list if you need additional help https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140626.m3E6QeLw021068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From pravi.a at ippimail.com 2008-04-14 02:26 EST ------- Rahul, this is not an isolated incident. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584 for example. We see the response as "we don't care about Malayalam". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140643.m3E6hh6I024041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:43 EST ------- Bugzilla is not a discussion forum. Ideally those want to include new packages will submit it for review themselves and get others in the community involved to review and approve it and not necessarily rely on specific people. Regardless of that, smc-fonts package already been submitted for review and will follow due process to get included which is not tied up to releases. Feel free to drop me a line offlist or catch me on IRC if you want to discuss this more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140652.m3E6q1Tk028690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-14 02:52 EST ------- done the modification as per suggestions see the changelog for modifications link for updated files http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 06:56:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140656.m3E6ubpB029797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-14 02:56 EST ------- Well, but i still did not see anyremote RPM's on Fedora download area. Is it needs to do something else ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 08:29:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140829.m3E8TNsj012766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-14 04:29 EST ------- A suggestion: If possible I would prefer a seperate package for the icon theme. I believe this theme is used by many GNOME or KDE users. So having it as a seperate package without the need of installing lxde and it's dependencies would fit their needs better. And lxde-common could simply require it. For this I assume that the integrated icon theme in the source tarball don't differ from the normal icon theme for GNOME or KDE. BTW: lxde-common.src:18: W: prereq-use coreutils The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 09:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140901.m3E91I2v018859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|436356 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 09:01:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140901.m3E91HeK018826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-04-14 05:01 EST ------- So the Extension guidelines and the java guidelines are finalized now, so I adapted the spec to the new canonical locations and retained the "cleaned" source. So I believe we're good now again to continue, agreed ? http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/extendedPDF/openoffice.org-extendedPDF.spec http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/extendedPDF/openoffice.org-extendedPDF-1.4-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 09:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804140941.m3E9f00t030452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From arbiter at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-14 05:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/network/bip.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/bip-0.7.2-3.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Apr 14 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.7.2-3 - Removed INSTALL from %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 10:27:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141027.m3EARc11006891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 ------- Additional Comments From swhiteho at redhat.com 2008-04-14 06:27 EST ------- Ok. I think we've sorted out all of the above now. Please take a look and let us know if you can still see anything missing. bz #224154 and #433592 are fixed by the latest rawhide build. I'm not sure if I need to do anything to push that out like I did for F-8? make update doesn't seem to work for devel. I marked the bugs modified in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 10:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141059.m3EAx6N3008138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-14 06:59 EST ------- Free, but GPLv2 and GPLv3 incompatible. Use: License: VOSTROM Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 11:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442022] Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141101.m3EB1xaP013315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wordwarvi - Side-scrolling shoot 'em up '80s style arcade game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-14 07:01 EST ------- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wordwarvi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/wordwarvi-0.06-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 11:02:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438932] Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141102.m3EB252g013349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438932 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-14 07:02 EST ------- I have not seen such case where .deps also got installed. Just search for .deps under /usr/share/doc and afaics there is no .deps there. so if you want .deps also then I will ask you to drop %doc example/*.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 11:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141106.m3EB6Pna010106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 07:06 EST ------- Taking the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 11:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141108.m3EB8CJp010301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-14 07:08 EST ------- I'll review this, Jindrich, can you post URL's to a modified gphoto2 using this separate libgphoto package too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 11:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141125.m3EBPi6r017767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-14 07:25 EST ------- Sure, here we go: Spec URL: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/gphoto2.spec SRPM URL: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/gphoto2-2.4.0-7.fc8.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 11:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141152.m3EBqZn7022334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 07:52 EST ------- Needs work: * Source Cython-0.9.6.13.1.tar.gz is different from upstream (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) using md5sum I get: b84818d4cfcec68e6dfb71187e9f0b4b upstream 3b7bde3b0869b3624cd80fe5cde4e2ed srpm * rpmlint of source RPM: Cython.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 22, tab: line 1) Cython.src: W: invalid-license PSFL * rpmlint of Cython: Cython.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/Cython-0.9.6.13.1/CHANGES_pyrex.txt Cython.noarch: W: invalid-license PSFL The license should be Python. The mixed use of spaces and tabs is easy to fix and the other warning is just that. :-) * %files According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python /!\ You shouldn't rely on INSTALLED_FILES, as that will not list directories, which will need to be specified in the %files section as well. Using globs in the %files section is safer. * %description You refer Doc/About.html but that file is not packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:10:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141210.m3ECAeVd021940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 08:10 EST ------- Other than he is right? ;-) I agree that texhash should be run for -doc. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141222.m3ECMVYT028784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-14 08:22 EST ------- Full review done: * This %define (luckily) does not seem to be used, please remove: # Arches on which we need to prevent arch conflicts in gphoto2-config %define multilib_arches %{ix86} ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x x86_64 * I suppose this using 0.x scheme is only for the review, and you will jump to 1%{?dist} after review? Release: 0.1%{?dist} * Source0: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/gphoto/libgphoto2-%{version}.tar.bz2 That is not the prefered form for a sf.net download url, that should be: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gphoto/libgphoto2-%{version}.tar.bz2 * Is this really needed? : ExcludeArch: s390 s390x I understand libgphoto is almost useless there, but it might be handy to still have it so that applications which can use it don't have to have their specfiles filled with %ifarch * You should preserve the timestamps while converting the docs, so replace: for i in AUTHORS COPYING; do cp ${i} ${i}.old iconv -f cp1250 -t utf-8 < ${i}.old > ${i} rm -f ${i}.old done with for i in AUTHORS COPYING; do mv ${i} ${i}.old iconv -f cp1250 -t utf-8 < ${i}.old > ${i} touch -r ${i}.old ${i} rm -f ${i}.old done * License tag is wrong, the following source files are not LGPLv2+ GPLv2: camlibs/adc65/adc65.c GPLv2+: camlibs/fuji/fuji.c camlibs/minolta/dimagev/* camlibs/mustek/* camlibs/stv0680/* libgphoto2/exif.c LGPLv2: camlibs/sipix/blink.c So the correct license lines would be: # GPLV2+ for the main lib (due to exif.c) and most plugins, some plugins GPLv2 License: GPLv2+ and GPLv2 * The descriptions need to be updated for the fact that this package now only contains a lib and no longer the gphoto2 application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:20:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141220.m3ECKwva024003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-14 08:20 EST ------- Please see http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/Cython-0.9.6.13.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438932] Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141226.m3ECQb2d025140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438932 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-14 08:26 EST ------- OK, .deps removed http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/libotf-0.9.7-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141232.m3ECWVtI026201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-14 08:32 EST ------- Note, these 2 remarks are valid for the separate gphoto2 itself too: * This %define (luckily) does not seem to be used, please remove: # Arches on which we need to prevent arch conflicts in gphoto2-config %define multilib_arches %{ix86} ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x x86_64 * Is this really needed? : ExcludeArch: s390 s390x -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141237.m3ECb2pl027014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-14 08:37 EST ------- Early asc F-10 branch request: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: asc New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:58:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442328] Remote database should be more easily findable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141258.m3ECwiJB003066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Remote database should be more easily findable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442328 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442329 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442248] Add patches necessary for gnome-lirc-properties In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141258.m3ECwjrk003100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Add patches necessary for gnome-lirc-properties https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442248 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442329 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440231] lircd just exits when device isn't supported In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141258.m3ECwkgD003132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: lircd just exits when device isn't supported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440231 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442329 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:58:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] New: gnome-lirc-properties: Infrared Remote Controls setup tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 Summary: gnome-lirc-properties: Infrared Remote Controls setup tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com gnome-lirc-properties helps users set up infrared remote controls for use with the LIRC framework. No packages yet, it needs quite a bit of porting work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 12:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141257.m3ECvJsc030794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-14 08:57 EST ------- http://dl.atrpms.net/all/freenx-client-0.9-7.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/freenx-client.spec * Thu Apr 10 2008 Axel Thimm - 0.9-7 - Fix description. - Remove devel files and embedded *-devel Provides:. - Create a desktop file for qtnx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141402.m3EE2GFo017057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 10:02 EST ------- Review: + scratch build in koji works fine + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a88a77e6b22ac077c729234c15671908 malayalam-fonts-04.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + font is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141404.m3EE452s012751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-04-14 10:04 EST ------- Pravin, you may continue with the CVSAdmin procedure now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141407.m3EE7GuY013736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 10:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302341&action=view) Spec file patch with some fixes +* Mon Apr 14 2008 Jos? Matos - 0.9.6.13.1-3 +- Remove remaining --record. +- Add more documentation (Doc and Tools). +- Add correct entry for egg-info (F9+). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:21:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141421.m3EELJhW016830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 10:21 EST ------- In this I thought it was easier to send a patch. :-) There was a spurious --record left in %install, I have rename the lib dir location following the usual name (it is easier to follow). I have added more documentation, IMHO there is no reason not to include the whole Doc directory. For Tools it would be nice to have the cython-mode.el as a sub-package but clearly it is not required. :-) Regarding the egg-info I see that you still using F-8. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] gnome-lirc-properties: Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141426.m3EEQkLR017876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-lirc-properties: Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442342] New: Review Request: pnp - Nagios performance data analysis tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442342 Summary: Review Request: pnp - Nagios performance data analysis tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/pnp.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/pnp-0.4.7-5.fc8.src.rpm Description: PNP is an addon to nagios which analyzes performance data provided by plugins and stores them automatically into RRD-databases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141439.m3EEduFt020704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 10:39 EST ------- I have to say that recently the cycle of releasing updates package is very slow :( (i.e. it is not because of you) If you want you can change the "Request" type from "testing" to "stable" (I usually request to push directly to stable repository) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 14:48:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141448.m3EEmWQi022946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-14 10:48 EST ------- Higher libraries like ecore aren't that loose and splitting out directfb and opengl engines in this lib doesn't make sense in real world use cases. Repackaged to single RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141505.m3EF51ce031895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141505.m3EF52nE032103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442353 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:04:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] New: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/ecore-goes-rawhide/ecore.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/ecore-goes-rawhide/ecore-0.9.9.042-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/ecore-goes-rawhide/ Description: Ecore is the event/X abstraction layer that makes doing selections, Xdnd, general X stuff, event loops, timeouts and idle handlers fast, optimized, and convenient. RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to built software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:05:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141505.m3EF5lXP027198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141508.m3EF8jhd027752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-14 11:08 EST ------- Great! Please see: http://nbecker.fedorapeople.org/Cython-0.9.6.13.1-3.fc8.src.rpm (same as your patch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141516.m3EFGbmO029804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-14 11:16 EST ------- I was the previous maintainer of lft in Fedora; it was remove due to non-freeness of the license. I'm kind of surprised to see that it's OK now when the license hasn't changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:21:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141521.m3EFLbBG004236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-14 11:21 EST ------- License: does not match the guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Source: should be a full url. There are specific rules in the packaging guidelines for Sourceforge URLs. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL BuildRoot: doesn't match the guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 There are specific rules on how to create an user. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups initscript is not handled properly : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#head-91577460937bcc1e94127ca00afd8e69274823b0 Some files path should be replaced by macros : /var/log %{_localstatedir}/log /etc/nagios %{sysconfdir}/nagios %{_prefix}/bin %{_bindir} Stopping the nagios server on %%preun looks a bit suspicious to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:24:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141524.m3EFOgZN004623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-14 11:24 EST ------- Are you aware that evas was in Fedora up to FC-5? You might want to check with the previous maintainer, Ignacio, for some tips since his package was significantly different from the one you've submitted. Not that there's any requirement that your package match the old one, but perhaps he had reasons for doing things a certain way which he can share with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141537.m3EFbUGk007565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 11:37 EST ------- Review for release 3.fc9: * RPM name is OK * Source Cython-0.9.6.13.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * License is OK (31 checks have been run) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439163] Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141541.m3EFfJxG008591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439163 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(simon at sxw.org.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-14 11:41 EST ------- Sorry about the delay on this. Work's been getting in the way a bit much recently ... :) Anyway, here's an updated SPEC and SRPM which addresses these issues. Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/sxw/perl-HTML-Prototype.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/sxw/perl-HTML-Prototype-1.48-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:53:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141553.m3EFrceD004948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 11:53 EST ------- I can review this package if Jason does not want and/or is too busy. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 15:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141557.m3EFvxvW011910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From goldschr at cshl.edu 2008-04-14 11:57 EST ------- Okay, I think I've gotten all of these fixed, except the BuildRoot, which I don't believe was really in error -- it was copied and pasted directly from the packaging guidelines. Anyway, here's the fixed URLs: Spec URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec SRPM URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-8.src.rpm Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] New: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd-4.2.3.100.g79b0797-2.src.rpm Description: Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files collectd is a small daemon written in C for performance. It reads various system statistics and updates RRD files, creating them if neccessary. Since the daemon doesn't need to startup every time it wants to update the files it's very fast and easy on the system. Also, the statistics are very fine grained since the files are updated every 10 seconds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141600.m3EG0Yrn012866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-04-14 12:00 EST ------- tibbs, I'm happy to withdraw this request if you'll pick it back up then. Spot, paragraphs 5 and 7 aren't problematic anymore? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:01:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141601.m3EG1uAF007084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-14 12:01 EST ------- rpmlint is clean except for these errors which I don't really understand: collectd.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd collectd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog collectd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog collectd.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog rpmlint -i says: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the script manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:05:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233142] Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141605.m3EG5SUe014180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asc - Advanced Strategic Command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233142 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 12:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:06:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428364] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141606.m3EG68EK014287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Alias: fedora-ds-admin-cons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-14 12:06 EST ------- Why has this never been built? It would be nice to get into F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141608.m3EG8tqY008384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 12:08 EST ------- I think so. Orion: Do you want the cvs request from comment #8? Or does it need any updating before processing? Is the package in comment #22 good from your side? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442377] New: Review Request: python-pysctp - Python binding for the SCTP network protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442377 Summary: Review Request: python-pysctp - Python binding for the SCTP network protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nhorman at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/python-pysctp-0.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/python-pysctp.spec Description: python-pysctp is the python binding code for the SCTP network protocol. SCTP uses a set of extensions to the standard BSD socket api, and this pythhon module exposes those extensions to the python programming language, making the protocol useable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225706] Merge Review: dos2unix In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141615.m3EGFvRS010075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dos2unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225706 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-04-14 12:15 EST ------- Thanks. Built as dos2unix-3.1-32.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 176071] Review Request: silgraphite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141617.m3EGHXpG010355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silgraphite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176071 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caolanm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:22:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141622.m3EGMHhM017831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-14 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > I think so. > Orion: Do you want the cvs request from comment #8? Or does it need any updating > before processing? Is the package in comment #22 good from your side? > Original CVS request is good. New package looks good too. I'll remove the Requires EVR from the F-9 package, and add appropriate versions to the F-7/8 packages as noted in the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141622.m3EGMtKu011533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-14 12:22 EST ------- Just for reference here it is my review: Review for release 1.fc9: * RPM name is OK * Source Sphinx-0.1.61950.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * The license is OK (and included in the package) (30 checks have been run) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:30:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428364] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141630.m3EGU8JC013530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Alias: fedora-ds-admin-cons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-04-14 12:30 EST ------- I'm working on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436356] Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141628.m3EGSphU012935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-extendedPDF - Create PDF with hyperlinks, bookmarks and more https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436356 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:29:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141629.m3EGTKWo019194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-14 12:29 EST ------- It doesn't differ much except in fc5 times it was built with edb support, and now edb is deprecated. Ignacio was including implicit "Provides:" for all enabled features, but i don't think it's needed since evas release is single tarball resulting in single RPM (-devel doesn't count) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:31:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141631.m3EGVeWx014061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-14 12:31 EST ------- Sorry, s/implicit/explicit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141653.m3EGrbZ9024573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-14 12:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Cython Short Description: A language for writing Python extension modules Owners: nbecker Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 16:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141657.m3EGvTt9020316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 12:57 EST ------- Well, for 0.7.3-3: * Requires - "Requires: qt4" is redundant and this should be removed. This type of Requires are automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms by rpmbuild. And I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141708.m3EH8lOo022851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436683] Review Request: xmltoman - Scripts for converting XML to roff or HTML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141706.m3EH6Sp8022548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmltoman - Scripts for converting XML to roff or HTML Alias: xmltoman-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436683 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xmltoman New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:08:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141708.m3EH8PAa022767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:08 EST ------- Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pulseaudio New Branches: EL-5 Owners for new branch: lkundrak cvsextras commits for new branch: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141709.m3EH9C2Q022990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:09 EST ------- Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: padevchooser New Branches: EL-5 Owners for new branch: lkundrak cvsextras commits for new branch: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141710.m3EHAwYY028850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:10 EST ------- Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: liblrdf New Branches: EL-5 Owners for new branch: green,lkundrak cvsextras commits for new branch: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141708.m3EH8u8r028190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:08 EST ------- Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pavumeter New Branches: EL-5 Owners for new branch: lkundrak cvsextras commits for new branch: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:10:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141710.m3EHAqZa023642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:10 EST ------- Maintainer is OK with the change as per previous conversation with him. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: raptor New Branches: EL-5 Owners for new branch: green,lkundrak cvsextras commits for new branch: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141718.m3EHI0ds030293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 13:17 EST ------- I'd be very thiankful if you could request and maintain a EPEL-5 branch for this package. In case you don't want or can't do that, let me know and I'll do that. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141715.m3EHFSxJ029948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 13:15 EST ------- (Well, I am checking the build on rawhide and I have not yet installed this package) * Rebuild fails by various reasons: - On rawhide pulseaudio-devel does not exist, and BR is sufficient with pulseaudio-libs-devel - BR: dotconf is not needed (redundant). BR: dotconf-devel is enough. - Even after I change BR from pulseaudio-devel to pulseaudio-libs-devel, the build still fails as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=564317 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=564319&name=build.log Note: - /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/speechd-0.3-py2.5.egg-info is only created (automatically) on F-9+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:48:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442404] Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141748.m3EHmhah004705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442404 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442404] New: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442404 Summary: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/efreet.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/efreet-0.0.3.042-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/efreet-goes-rawhide/ Description: An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org intended for use in Enlightenment DR17 (e17) and other applications using the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries (EFL). Currently, the following specifications are included: o Base Directory o Desktop Entry o Icon Theme o Menu Documentation is absent for this release. It's upstream bug that should be fixed in next release. Otherwise RPMLint is silent. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/ msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to built software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141749.m3EHnDf0032733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442404 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442404] Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141749.m3EHnC8L032708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442404 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 17:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141750.m3EHoD0E005297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-14 13:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Okay, I think I've gotten all of these fixed, except the BuildRoot, which I > don't believe was really in error -- it was copied and pasted directly from the > packaging guidelines. > Ok, my bad for the BuildRoot. > Anyway, here's the fixed URLs: > > Spec URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx.spec > SRPM URL: http://neckbeard.info/packages/fedora/dnx-0.18-8.src.rpm > > Thanks for the feedback. The package doesn't build in mock. Changing : %{__install} -d -m 0755 %{dnxrundir} to %{__install} -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{dnxrundir} fixes it. Once built, rpmlint output is not clean, mostly because of the strange %%defattr of the %%files sections. Also, please take care of the changelog. The release bumps from -1 to -7 and I don't know what happened in between and the package actual release is -8 anyway. The group creation is still not clean : getent group %{dnxgroup} >/dev/null || groupadd -r GROUPNAME Missing %post section : %post /sbin/chkconfig --add %{dnxsvc} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:15:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141815.m3EIFOJw011599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-14 14:15 EST ------- The README file will need a little surgery: sed -i -e 's/\r//' README The tarball included in the doc should be handled differently. The %{_sbindir}/rcdnxcld symlink should be killed and the initscript needs some work too. nagios-dnx probably needs to require nagios. I've not read enough about dnx, but the package names are maybe not optimal. Something like dnx and dnx-client might be better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141821.m3EILYkD008178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-14 14:21 EST ------- I contacted Ignacio, he's not interested in maintaining EFL anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141823.m3EINvFd013569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From goldschr at cshl.edu 2008-04-14 14:23 EST ------- The openSUSE packages were originally just named dnx-server and dnx-client; it seemed silly to me when I first looked at it because the dnx-client is a daemon so I changed it based on the recommendations of a few people in #fedora-devel, but looking at it more it probably makes sense to keep it the same as it was in openSUSE. Nice catch again on the nagios require. I don't know how I managed to miss something that obvious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:30:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442423] amarok: cvsadmin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141830.m3EIUGgp009922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: amarok: cvsadmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442423 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442423] amarok: cvsadmin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141830.m3EIU5Jm009874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: amarok: cvsadmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442423 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-14 14:30 EST ------- now, closing in case anyone gets the wrong idea. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442423] New: amarok: cvsadmin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442423 Summary: amarok: cvsadmin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Can't find pkg review (pkg too old), so where's a placeholder for cvsadmin requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141839.m3EIdEMe017159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 14:39 EST ------- *** Bug 220393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141840.m3EIexDR017793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-14 14:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > The openSUSE packages were originally just named dnx-server and dnx-client; it > seemed silly to me when I first looked at it because the dnx-client is a daemon > so I changed it based on the recommendations of a few people in #fedora-devel, > but looking at it more it probably makes sense to keep it the same as it was in > openSUSE. > You probably know better than I ;-) I had the same trouble with nsca. rpmlint will complain if the initscript is not named after the package name anyway... > Nice catch again on the nagios require. I don't know how I managed to miss > something that obvious. The other one will need to own %{_sysconfdir}/nagios, as they are both dropping conf file in /etc/nagios. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220393] Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141839.m3EIdD20017138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synopsis - Source-code Introspection Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220393 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 14:39 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 438543 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 18:59:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141859.m3EIxAk8016689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 14:59 EST ------- Well, I have not checked this in detail, however looks good at a quick glance, will check later. By the way, as this is a NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141904.m3EJ44OE022873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-14 15:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > A suggestion: If possible I would prefer a seperate package for the icon > theme. Done. lxde-common now requires nuoveXT-icon-theme because nuoveXT is the only theme that has all icons needed for lxsession's logut dialog. If we could fix that we could make the icon theme optional and use fedora by default. > BTW: > lxde-common.src:18: W: prereq-use coreutils Fixed (removed). This was stolen from hicolor-icon-theme and is not really needed here. SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common.spec SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common-0.3.0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141909.m3EJ9HYm024104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-14 15:09 EST ------- For 0.9.4-2: * SourceURL - Source0 must be given with full URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Also I suggest to use %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz. With this style you won't have to modify SourceURL when new version is released. * Cleaning directory at %install - Please fix the first line in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189309] Review Request: raptor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141935.m3EJZ06A029292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: raptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189309 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:36:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195221] Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141936.m3EJarex030014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195221 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189313] Review Request: liblrdf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141936.m3EJa6V6024884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblrdf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189313 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198088] Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141938.m3EJcgAR025472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pavumeter: Volume meter for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198088 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198089] Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141939.m3EJdjfE030673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: padevchooser: Control applet for PulseAudio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198089 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:43:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436683] Review Request: xmltoman - Scripts for converting XML to roff or HTML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141943.m3EJhoQa026705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmltoman - Scripts for converting XML to roff or HTML Alias: xmltoman-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436683 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:41:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141941.m3EJfp0A026353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 15:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442437] Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141946.m3EJkdCF032594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442437 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141946.m3EJkdTx032619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442437 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:46:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442437] Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141946.m3EJk6GJ032426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442437 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442437] Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141947.m3EJl0CQ027650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442437 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804141947.m3EJl1JY027680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442437 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 19:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442437] New: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442437 Summary: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/edje-goes-rawhide/edje.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/edje-goes-rawhide/edje-0.5.0.042-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/edje-goes-rawhide/ Description: A graphical layout and animation library for animated resizable, compressed and scalable themes. RPMLint is silent on all RPMs i built. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/ msg00020.html ) I've been able to successfully use rpms built in mock on different machine to built software against this library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 20:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142007.m3EK7shm005305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 16:07 EST ------- This is required for OpenJDK in EPEL to be build for ppc. I'd be very thankful if you could maintain the EL-5 branch. In case you're not interested please let me know and I'll request and maintain the branch myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 20:28:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142028.m3EKSh3i009926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 ------- Additional Comments From drzeus-bugzilla at drzeus.cx 2008-04-14 16:28 EST ------- Please do. I don't really have enough time for the Fedora packages. So feel free to give those some love as well. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 20:28:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142028.m3EKSL2h004341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-04-14 16:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > This is required for OpenJDK in EPEL to be build for ppc. I'd be very thankful > if you could maintain the EL-5 branch. In case you're not interested please let > me know and I'll request and maintain the branch myself. Please go ahead and do that. Thanks! AG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 20:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142031.m3EKVhDh010842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-14 16:31 EST ------- Chris, I'm not sure how to build an sqlite test env. I've looked at it a bit, but I'm not sure how to proceed. The flu that is hammering me down for 3 days probably doesn't help. Any hint or suggestion ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 20:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142032.m3EKWOKg005409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 16:32 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libffi New Branches: EL-5 New branch owner: lkundrak New branch cvsextras commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 20:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142059.m3EKxGIZ017371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-14 16:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libatomic_ops New Branches: EL-5 New branch owner: lkundrak New branch cvsextras commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 21:40:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142140.m3ELePaO026470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-14 17:40 EST ------- Heh... I'm dealing with a head-cold myself. Ugh. :) Let me take a more in depth look at DBI-ODBC and see what we need to do in order to create a small testing environment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 21:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442462] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142146.m3ELkhnK027578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 21:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142146.m3ELki0S027602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442462 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 21:46:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442462] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142146.m3ELktLe027643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 21:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442462] New: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e_dbus-goes-rawhide/e_dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e_dbus-goes-rawhide/e_dbus-0.1.0.042-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/e_dbus-goes-rawhide/ Description: Basic convenience wrappers around dbus to ease integrating dbus with EFL based applications. RPMLint displays warning about absent doc, but there are none yet, this is first release of e_dbus. License is a bit customized, but Tom "spot" Callawayin from fedora-legal-list said it's MIT ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-April/msg00020.html ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 22:04:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142204.m3EM4mVB031272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-04-14 18:04 EST ------- %changelog * Mon Apr 14 2008 Henry Kroll - 0.9.4-3 clean install, include full source0: path http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xmms-pulse.spec http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xmms-pulse-0.9.4-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 22:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] New: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/parcellite.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/parcellite-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Parcellite is a lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager. This is a stripped down, basic-features-only clipboard manager with a small memory footprint for those who like simplicity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 14 23:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804142357.m3ENvxaC014682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-04-14 19:57 EST ------- The 'incoherent-subsys' warning is bogus. It is complaining that it wants the lockfile in /var/lock/subsys to be called 'collectd', instead of '$prog'. It is too dumb to realize that $prog is a shell env var initialized to 'collectd' earlier. The other error about /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd can be fixed by changing %config(noreplace) %{_initrddir}/collectd to just %{_initrddir}/collectd so the initscript isn't marked as a config file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 00:04:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150004.m3F040J8021003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-04-14 20:04 EST ------- Looking at the spec file there's a couple of suggestions/questions I'd have - Don't blow away the Perl bindings. These should be packaged in a sub-RPM - probably with the name perl-Collectd - Why are the following plugins disabled in the build with configure flags ? --disable-mysql \ --disable-sensors \ --disable-email \ --disable-apache \ --disable-perl \ --disable-unixsock I'd be inclined to compile everything and if a particular plugin has too many deps, then put it in a sub-RPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 00:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150022.m3F0Mtd7024635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 20:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 00:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204579] Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150022.m3F0M6nw019160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libatomic_ops - Atomic memory update operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204579 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 20:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 01:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150133.m3F1XSUJ031578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-14 21:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > This library blocks the inclusion into Fedora of a lot of interesting software. > Indeed! Scilab 5 which will be relicensed as CeCill won't be available (As I'm trying to package it). For now, gluegen doesn't seems affected by the FE-Legal issue. Someone interested in the review ? For the jogl case, there is a possibility to work on livna/RPM Fusion until an alternative solution is available. But I wonder if we can provide the jogl package twice: once of RPMFusion freeworld and the other with RPMFusion nonfree (for Cg support). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 03:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150358.m3F3wwTh004266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-14 23:58 EST ------- I would be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a few here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:02:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150402.m3F42nxI005319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 00:02 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 19f881141e18a4f4402af16738ee5ae7 epplets-0.10.tar.gz 19f881141e18a4f4402af16738ee5ae7 epplets-0.10.tar.gz.orig See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} See below - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. As with e16, could you ping upstream to try and change sometime to a nicer license? Not a blocker, but would be nice to do. 2. I see in the build.log: configure: WARNING: *** GL epplets will not be built *** Missing buildrequires? 3. Any reason to ship the .la and .a files? .la files should be removed and unless there is some good reason, static libs shouldn't be shipped. 4. rpmlint says: e16-epplets.src: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising e16-epplets.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising e16-epplets-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising e16-epplets-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation e16-epplets-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising Can be ignored. 5. Not a blocker, but Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig shouldn't be needed. rpm is smart enough to add this requires because you are using -p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150409.m3F49GhY006449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 00:09 EST ------- Everything looks good to me... You might look at point #3 above sometime, but as I said, thats a minor item, not a blocker. I see no further issues, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150416.m3F4GwKK008117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-15 00:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: smc-fonts Short Description: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script Owners: pravins Branches: F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150433.m3F4XNsD002998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-15 00:33 EST ------- I suggest simplifying the spec file with the replacement s/-n %{fontname}-fonts-//g before importing to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150431.m3F4V7jd002690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 psatpute at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 04:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150454.m3F4sn7N006797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 ------- Additional Comments From psatpute at redhat.com 2008-04-15 00:54 EST ------- Jens, done it is working nice :) http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/smc-fonts/smc-fonts-04-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 05:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150503.m3F53FjU016528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-04-15 01:03 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 05:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150547.m3F5lhQa016219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-15 01:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #57) > Source needs to be: > > http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpich2/downloads/tarballs/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > Noted, thanks. > Also, is not building in current rawhide mock: > Please make sure you're updated to the latest mock in rawhide (mock-0.9.8-1.fc9), earlier version may contain a bug causing this build failure. It builds succesfully for me on x86_64 rawhide with mock-0.9.8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 06:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150656.m3F6uBBN004087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-15 02:56 EST ------- > 1. As with e16, could you ping upstream to try and change sometime > to a nicer license? Not a blocker, but would be nice to do. Ok. > 2. I see in the build.log: > configure: WARNING: *** GL epplets will not be built *** > > Missing buildrequires? Yes, adding freeglut-devel and mesa-libGLU-devel fixed that, thanks. > 3. Any reason to ship the .la and .a files? .la files should be removed > and unless there is some good reason, static libs shouldn't be shipped. Removed. > 5. Not a blocker, but > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Removed. spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-epplets.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-epplets-0.10-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 07:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] New: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/libspe2.spec SRPM URL: ftp://testcase.software.ibm.com/fromibm/linux/libspe2-2.2.80-95.src.rpm Please use anonymous FTP to download files. Description: SPE Runtime Management Library for the Cell Broadband Engine Architecture. This package is already part of the RHEL 5.1 Supplementary CD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 07:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150738.m3F7cmAA003312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-15 03:38 EST ------- The answer is simply 'because that's how the RPM / specfile was when I found it.' I'm just doing an upgraded version, back in a bit ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 07:39:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150739.m3F7dB5X011655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 jroth at linux.vnet.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |ppc64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 08:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150828.m3F8SrKi013836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-15 04:28 EST ------- I added the texhash for doc too in release 4. See http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 09:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] gnome-lirc-properties: Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150900.m3F90caq020617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gnome-lirc-properties: Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-04-15 05:00 EST ------- Spec: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-lirc-properties/gnome-lirc-properties.spec Source: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-lirc-properties/gnome-lirc-properties-0.2.5-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 09:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804150903.m3F931km029173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-15 05:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd-4.3.2-1.src.rpm * Tue Apr 15 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 4.3.2-1 - New upstream version 4.3.2. - Create a -devel subpackage for development stuff, examples, etc. - Use .bz2 package instead of .gz. - Remove fix-hostname patch, now upstream. - Don't mark collectd init script as config. - Enable MySQL, sensors, email, apache, Perl, unixsock support. - Don't remove example Perl scripts. - Package types.db(5) manpage. - Fix defattr. - Build in koji to find the full build-requires list. Koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=566445 The only problem I can see with this one is that the Perl packages get installed in site_perl instead of vendor_perl. I looked at the Makefiles and couldn't see a way to change this. rpmlint complains but the Fedora Perl guidelines don't mention anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 09:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442513] New: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442513 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Cache-Lite.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Cache-Lite-1.7.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Mock Log: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Cache-Lite-build.log Scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=566443 Description: This package is a little cache system optimized for file containers. It is fast and safe (because it uses file locking and/or anti-corruption tests). -- rpmlint is silent. My goal is to remove the cache_lite bundled in GLPI to use the system one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 10:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151042.m3FAgDv5008111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-04-15 06:42 EST ------- Afaics these are the issues, that still need to be addressed, I will see what I can do about them soon: 2. Why is pkgconfig BuildRequires there? 3. Should there be a Requires: pam? 5. Why is there a Conflicts: bluez-utils < 2.25-6 ? Shouldn't you just require the newer one? pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-suspend-hybrid pm-utils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-hibernate /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-hibernate pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-hibernate pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-suspend-hybrid pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-suspend pm-utils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend-hybrid /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-powersave pm-utils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-suspend pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-powersave pm-utils.i686: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log pm-utils.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv pm-utils.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv What are you trying to do in that pre? It looks odd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 10:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] New: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/audit-viewer.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/audit-viewer-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: A graphical utility for viewing and summarizing audit events. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 11:40:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151140.m3FBeX2a019930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-04-15 07:40 EST ------- On issue is missing: it needs to be checked, whether these Requires are needed: kbd pciutils >= 2.2.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 11:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151136.m3FBax53019134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-04-15 07:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > 2. Why is pkgconfig BuildRequires there? This will be removed (also all other BRs). Maybe they were all needed for vbetool or radeontool, which now are in their own packages. > 3. Should there be a Requires: pam? pm-utils requires usermode which requires pam. > 5. Why is there a > Conflicts: bluez-utils < 2.25-6 > ? Shouldn't you just require the newer one? This will be removed, too. > pm-utils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-hibernate > /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action > pm-utils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend-hybrid > /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action > pm-utils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/pm-suspend > /usr/lib/pm-utils/bin/pm-action I do not know how to do this directly in automake, I will see what we can do about this at upstream. > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-suspend-hybrid > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-hibernate > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-hibernate > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-suspend-hybrid > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-suspend > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/pm-powersave > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-suspend > pm-utils.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/pm-powersave I am not sure, whether these file are intended to be edited by anyone, half of them are empty, anyways. Maybe it is even completely wrong to allow users to run pm-utils directly, so these files can be removed. > pm-utils.i686: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log The logfile will be emptied on every run, so there is no need to rotate it. > pm-utils.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv > pm-utils.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv > > What are you trying to do in that pre? It looks odd. The scriptlets move the old config files to the new locations, I guess they can be removed when F9 is branched, because then every release should already have had the new pm-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 12:08:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435155] Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151208.m3FC8Y58000504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-15 08:08 EST ------- Closing this Review Request... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 12:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227191] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151215.m3FCFSwH027601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Services-Yadis - PHP Yadis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227191 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-15 08:15 EST ------- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 12:17:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151217.m3FCHY7Z002894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-15 08:17 EST ------- If Brandon won't find any free time to review this package, then I'll pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 12:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151222.m3FCMCK0004044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-04-15 08:22 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: stgit New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 12:27:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435090] Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151227.m3FCRHgg004965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 13:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151353.m3FDrATo024405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-15 09:53 EST ------- Apparently we need: --with-perl-bindings=INSTALLDIRS=vendor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 13:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151358.m3FDwp4F017701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-15 09:58 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd-4.3.2-2.src.rpm * Tue Apr 15 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 4.3.2-2 - Install Perl bindings in vendor dir not site dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 14:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151408.m3FE8iGJ028094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-15 10:08 EST ------- Feel free to take the spec for use elsewhere, of course. I think it is worth trying again to open up a conversation with SGI about this issue too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 14:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438805] Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151450.m3FEorm8031077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-MDB2-Driver-pgsql - PostgreSQL driver for MDB2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438805 dhollis at davehollis.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 15:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151543.m3FFhH5a020422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-15 11:43 EST ------- It doesn't build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=566788 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 16:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151631.m3FGVnq1032297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-04-15 12:31 EST ------- Meanwhile there is a new upstream release available which should solve the reported issues. I have uploa the new SPEC and source RPM at: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.4.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 16:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151646.m3FGkK4u027731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-15 12:46 EST ------- It's fair game if I've not assigned the review to myself, so please go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 16:59:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151659.m3FGxB66005679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at deadbabylon.de Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-15 12:59 EST ------- I'll do the review this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 17:19:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151719.m3FHJ9Bo002205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-15 13:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > - consider creating an egg-info for f7 and f8 I'll take this one back. As it turns out, eggs are entirely optional for f7 and f8, unless no other package requires them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 17:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151728.m3FHSJkU004471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-15 13:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #59) > It doesn't build in koji: > Known issue caused by a regression in mock (bug #442484), which I believe will be resolved soon. I will be pleased if you can continue with the review the package using local mock build for now (your resources permitting of course). I've uploaded a new src.rpm and spec file with the url fix; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 17:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151729.m3FHT7RB012505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-15 13:29 EST ------- Sorry the link should be; ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.7-2.fc9.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 18:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151849.m3FInuf7023196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-15 14:49 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 19:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804151927.m3FJRFOU006899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-15 15:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302508) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302508&action=view) collectd.spec for RHEL/CentOS 5 This is an alternate collectd.spec supplied by Richard Shade at Rightscale, with suggestions that the two be merged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 20:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804152008.m3FK8giT009444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|overholt at redhat.com |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-15 16:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > X specfile is legible > > - I'd rather see common_reqs split out and enumerated in both Requires and > > BuildRequires > > I thought this will save me from some errors and work when adding common > requires, but it's just a matter of personal taste. If you both think it doesn't > look well, I'll split it. It's not a blocker for us, so if you think it'll be easier to maintain, go for it :) > > Notes: > > > > - don't build with gcj at all because of this missing bit: > > > > [javac] import java.util.Scanner; > > [javac] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > [javac] The import java.util.Scanner cannot be resolved > > > > - remove gcj bits as the diff I'm attaching does > > Applied. I wonder if it's right that this didn't break the build? Yeah, it wasn't using libgcj's class library to build before. > > - re-name patches to match version (0.5 -> 0.6) > > I read somewhere, though I am not able to find the link now, that the version > number in patch name is one the patch was created against, and doesn't change > when it applies to newer upstream package. Okay, if it was generated against 0.5 then keep it. I guess my question is why it wasn't applied upstream :) I like to keep bugs and/or rationale in comments to denote why we're carrying patches ... but don't worry about it if you don't want to do it. > > - why don't you build a jrcs package and Require/BR it? > > AFAIK this is a fork of jrcs from times when it was part of Apache Commons and > is modified by OpenGrok developers. Currently development of jrcs development > continues in the place it did before, and I am not aware of any effort to put > OpenGrok modifications back there. Okay, well as long as it's building from source (as you have it doing), it's fine then. > > - why the big patch between 0.6 and this hg snapshot? if that's actually > > required, why not just use an hg snapshot tarball as SOURCE0 instead of 0.6 > > and patching? > > About the same reason kernel package does a thing like this. I updated the > package with new revisions quite rapidly and it would not make much sense to > waste space with new tarball until patch file has sane length. It can moreover > be compressed. Alright, I guess that's acceptable. > New package: > > http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/opengrok-0.6-8.hg275.fc8.1.src.rpm > http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec Okay, just two more things: What's going on with this? javadoc: error - Error while reading file /home/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/opengrok-0.6-src/jrcs/src/java/org/apache/commons/jrcs/overview.html And I don't think it should be trying to access the internet using hg during the build: -hg-get-changeset: [exec] Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "hg": java.io.IOException: error=2, No such file or directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 21:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804152152.m3FLqtPV000691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-04-15 17:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pysvn Short Description: Pythonic style bindings for Subversion Owners: ravenoak Branches: F-9 InitialCC: ravenoak Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 21:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804152158.m3FLwPgn010862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-15 17:58 EST ------- Need to change: < %{_datadir}/%{name}/*log* --- > %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.*log* to avoid having example_logging going into the base mpich2 package. mpich2-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/mpich2/bin32/mpif90/usr/bin/mp32-mpif90 (and same for mpif77, mpicc, mpicxx). Lots of: mpich2-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mpich2-32/mpe_callstack_ldflags.conf I also think a note should be made in the description of the package that this was compiled with the default options and so uses the mpd process manager and the ch3:sock communication device. Another thing to think about it who should take precedence among lam, openmpi, and mpich2 when they are all installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 22:38:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804152238.m3FMc8QW010641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-15 18:38 EST ------- > > I read somewhere, though I am not able to find the link now, that the version > > number in patch name is one the patch was created against, and doesn't change > > when it applies to newer upstream package. > > Okay, if it was generated against 0.5 then keep it. I guess my question is why > it wasn't applied upstream :) I like to keep bugs and/or rationale in comments > to denote why we're carrying patches ... but don't worry about it if you don't > want to do it. Upstream is very responsive to problems so it won't be a big problem. Most of the patches (probably with exception of Patch0 and at least of the two addressing the issues below) are things that are specific to our build -- it can be hardly imaginable that upstream will omit foreign jar files from the distribution, etc. When submitting patches upstream I usually direct them to our viewcvs, so they can eventually pick patches other that ones that I propose if they want to -- I'll probably do that in this case too. > Okay, just two more things: > > What's going on with this? > > javadoc: error - Error while reading file > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/opengrok-0.6-src/jrcs/src/java/org/apache/commons/jrcs/overview.html Not really fatal and doesn't seem to do any harm to the build, but for it being an annoyance I patched that away. > And I don't think it should be trying to access the internet using hg during the > build: > > -hg-get-changeset: > [exec] Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "hg": > java.io.IOException: error=2, No such file or directory Right. I just commented out that target. I guess the right solution (understand: one acceptable by upstream) would be to look for existence of .hg directory before trying to speak upstream. (Now I realize -- maybe hg would look into the local respoitory only, it's a distributed vcs, but I am not sure). New bits: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/opengrok-0.6-8.hg275.fc8.2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 23:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442640] New: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640 Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/epeg.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/epeg-0.9.1.042-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epeg-goes-rawhide/ Description: Epeg is insanely fast at loading large JPEG images and scaling them down to tiny thumbnails. It's speedup will be proportional to the size difference between the source image and the output thumbnail size as a count of their pixels. It makes use of libjpeg features of being able to load an image by only decoding the DCT coefficients needed to reconstruct an image of the size desired. This gives a massive speedup. If you do not try and access the pixels in a format other than YUV (or GRAY8 if the source is grascale) then it also avoids colorspace conversions as well. RPMLint spits out only W: no-documentation on -devel package because there's no documentation in upstream package. Epeg mostly helper library for higher-lever thumbnailing API - epsilon. Package works as expected - makes thumbnails of jpegs faster than imagemagick ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 15 23:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442640] Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804152325.m3FNPSS6020504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 01:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160138.m3G1ce7b021247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 21:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225906] Merge Review: iptables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160204.m3G246hx017364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iptables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225906 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 22:04 EST ------- Sorry for the delay here. Looking much better now: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 90cfa8a554a29b0b859a625e701af2a7 iptables-1.4.0.tar.bz2 90cfa8a554a29b0b859a625e701af2a7 iptables-1.4.0.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. See below - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun See below - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. You have the License as GPLv2. I see a mix in the source files of: GPL, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv2 or GPLv3. I think this results in: GPL+ for the license? 2. Any reason the package makes a static lib instead of a shared lib? Does anything use iptables-devel? Might be nice to remove the .a and make a shared lib instead. 3. rpmlint says: iptables.src: W: strange-permission iptables.init 0755 iptables.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config 0600 iptables.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables iptables.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables iptables-ipv6.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables-config 0600 iptables-ipv6.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ip6tables iptables-ipv6.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ip6tables All look ignorable. So, items 1 and 2 look to be the last issues to address... thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:06:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160206.m3G26Mau018151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 22:06 EST ------- Excellent. Can you ping me again when you are ready for me to recheck things? Thanks for looking into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160210.m3G2AEYL028108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-15 22:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #62) > Need to change: > > < %{_datadir}/%{name}/*log* > --- > > %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.*log* > > to avoid having example_logging going into the base mpich2 package. > Fixed, thanks. > mpich2-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/share/mpich2/bin32/mpif90/usr/bin/mp32-mpif90 > (and same for mpif77, mpicc, mpicxx). > I've fought with this in the past, I can't find a means of dealing with it sanely, suggestions welcomed. I believe it can be ignored. > Lots of: > > mpich2-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/mpich2-32/mpe_callstack_ldflags.conf > I think these can be safely ignored too, as most of them are constructed at build-time. > > I also think a note should be made in the description of the package that this > was compiled with the default options and so uses the mpd process manager and > the ch3:sock communication device. > Good point. It seems you've not noticed I did enabled dynamically loading sock, ssm, and shm channels; the default is still the sock channel though. I'm actually considering configuring the package to use ch3:nemesis on x86*, since it said to offer the best performance, thoughts? > > Another thing to think about it who should take precedence among lam, openmpi, > and mpich2 when they are all installed. It really shouldn't matter, anyone who will knowingly install the three, should be knowledgeable enough to set the default implementation, IMHO. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.7-3.fc9.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:23:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160223.m3G2N9qw030747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 22:23 EST ------- Everything looks good to me now... this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442295] Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160237.m3G2bLvd001495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 22:37 EST ------- I would be happy to review this, look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442295] Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160250.m3G2oADw027286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 22:50 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 64b23eec63c65f50b3a068f15d757067 thunar-shares-0.10.tar.bz2 64b23eec63c65f50b3a068f15d757067 thunar-shares-0.10.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: None. I see no issues, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160252.m3G2qrEU004819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 22:52 EST ------- I would be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 02:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442377] Review Request: python-pysctp - Python binding for the SCTP network protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160254.m3G2sNJH028035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pysctp - Python binding for the SCTP network protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442377 nhorman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 03:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160308.m3G38qe2031742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-15 23:08 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. See below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: bd14d029b12621bcfd7ee71b2f4893da tinyproxy-1.6.3.tar.gz bd14d029b12621bcfd7ee71b2f4893da tinyproxy-1.6.3.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} style macros, don't mix. ;) 2. Looks like you are missing some Requires for the init script/chkconfig calls. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#head-91577460937bcc1e94127ca00afd8e69274823b0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 05:31:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160531.m3G5VHwq002184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-16 01:31 EST ------- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: e16-epplets Short Description: Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 Owners: terjeros Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 06:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160653.m3G6r3Rl016842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From jdeslip at berkeley.edu 2008-04-16 02:53 EST ------- Will this package be in Fedora 9? Lots of people would be interested (Leigh123 on the forums also has an rpm for screenlets that seems to have lots of interest). But, it would be good to get something into the official repos. Are you having trouble getting someone to review it or something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 07:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 03:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160758.m3G7wYcq029778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-16 03:58 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: i386 [x] Rpmlint output: none [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL (no version specified) License tag: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : f2214617af03a8b8fa577dcb068426b6 MD5SUM upstream package: f2214617af03a8b8fa577dcb068426b6 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=566855 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=566855 [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. The tab "available window themes" was a bit confusing because I've assumed that it changes the window manager theme (openbox, metacity). But it was meant to change the GTK2 theme _inside_ the window. This is maybe worth to be bugged upstream. === Final Notes === 1. none ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 08:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160831.m3G8V1cc004708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-16 04:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd-4.3.2-4.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Apr 16 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 4.3.2-4 - Remove -devel subpackage. - Add subpackages for apache, email, mysql, nginx, sensors, snmp (thanks Richard Shade). - Add subpackages for perl, libvirt. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=568436 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 08:57:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160857.m3G8vVnk009478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at deadbabylon.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-16 04:57 EST ------- It seems that lxsession is not really working without smproxy from xorg-x11-xsm. Without it, it shows a logout screen with "logout" as the only option and seems to not save any running applications. With xorg-x11-xsm and started smproxy it really saves the session and also enhances the logout screen with other options (shutdown/reboot/suspend/hibernate). So I suggest: Requires: xorg-x11-xsm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 09:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160916.m3G9Gr8J005080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-04-16 05:16 EST ------- Everything except the rpmlint warnings and the Requires-check is now done, therefore a recheck would already help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 09:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804160920.m3G9KF1x014572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 apevec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From apevec at redhat.com 2008-04-16 05:20 EST ------- As per comment 3 and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-a516d9372a70e1acdfcda374de3886175435aba7 for perl subpkg add: %package -n perl-Collectd perl(Collectd) is already autogenerated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 10:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161017.m3GAHvX5027263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2008-04-16 06:17 EST ------- I recommend use bind-9.3.5 codebase (ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.3.5/bind-9.3.5.tar.gz) because 9.3.3rc2 has flaw (CVE-2008-0122). If you use 9.3.5 you have to drop "libbind-9.3.1rc1-fix_h_errno.patch" because it is included in 9.3.5 (in some different way) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 10:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442692] New: Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442692 Summary: Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gypsy.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gypsy-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Gypsy is a GPS multiplexing daemon which allows multiple clients to access GPS data from multiple GPS sources concurrently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 10:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue-0.10-0.1.20080415git.fc9.src.rpm Description: Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service built on top of the D-Bus messaging system. The goal of the Geoclue project is to make creating location-aware applications as simple as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 10:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161022.m3GAMfq3018145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |geoinformation service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 11:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442705] Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161127.m3GBRBCD008215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442705 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://et.redhat.com/~rjones | |/bitmatch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 11:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442705] New: Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442705 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-bitmatch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-bitmatch-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings Bitmatch adds Erlang-style bitstrings and matching over bitstrings as a syntax extension and library for OCaml. You can use this module to both parse and generate binary formats, for example, communications protocols, disk formats and binary files. Koji build for F9 is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=568516 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ocaml-bitmatch-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm ocaml-bitmatch.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions $ rpmlint ocaml-bitmatch-0.4-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm ocaml-bitmatch.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions ocaml-bitmatch.x86_64: E: no-binary ocaml-bitmatch.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib $ rpmlint ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm ocaml-bitmatch-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions These are all OK as per bug 433783. The invalid-license bug has been fixed in newer versions of rpmlint (I'm still using the one from F-8). Files in the main package: /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/META /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/bitmatch.cma /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/bitmatch.cmi /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/pa_bitmatch.cmo /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-0.4 /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-0.4/COPYING.LIB Files in the devel subpackage: /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/bitmatch.a /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/bitmatch.cmx /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/bitmatch.cmxa /usr/lib64/ocaml/bitmatch/bitmatch.mli /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4 /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/COPYING.LIB /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/README /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/examples /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/examples/ipv4_header.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/examples/make_ipv4_header.ml /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/Bitmatch.Buffer.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/Bitmatch.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_attributes.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_class_types.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_classes.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_exceptions.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_methods.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_module_types.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_modules.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_types.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/index_values.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/style.css /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/type_Bitmatch.Buffer.html /usr/share/doc/ocaml-bitmatch-devel-0.4/html/type_Bitmatch.html Requires in the main package: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 ocaml(Arg) = 03e86a4154064ea900dc32c05f53e364 ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Camlp4) = 2e045826779ef15857e5824a007fea98 ocaml(Camlp4_config) = cb716b4361f43326c6ad695c7a1bb5c0 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Location) = eed044ad1204a633caad97bdd9048f8c ocaml(Longident) = 46fb8aad4fb2c12a0f301b02d8139f07 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Queue) = caa3a209bfc63d23a30f573541a88fec ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Warnings) = abcb1589615da86f20f475b0ed3bbabc ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.0 Provides in the main package: ocaml(Bitmatch) = 8da1c38cf011e808e4be26d8bfb6b284 ocaml-bitmatch = 0.4-1.fc8 Note that I have been using this package successfully for a couple of weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 11:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161144.m3GBigBL001169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-16 07:44 EST ------- Thanks Jason. Michel the package looks OK there is a single problem: rpmlint of python-sphinx: python-sphinx.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sphinx/jinja/_speedups.c Also IMHO you could build the documentation in the %build stage, there is a Makefile in doc where the different targets are explained. The doc directory with the rst documents is interesting by itself so I suggest to package it. I suggest something like the patch that I will place in the next entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 11:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439337] Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161146.m3GBkro5012330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx - Python documentation generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439337 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-04-16 07:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302585) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302585&action=view) Patch to include more documentation (html and rst). Patch to include more documentation (html and rst). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 12:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161236.m3GCauEh013193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 arbiter at binaryhelix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 12:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] New: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arbiter at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/libs/sat-solver.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/sat-solver-0.0.27-20080416svn.fc9.src.rpm Description: sat-solver is a Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 13:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161349.m3GDnZj6028880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-04-16 09:49 EST ------- yes, i've got problem... I will use the setup command given by Nicolas Chauvet to have a good generation. I know that a lot of people want to have screenlets eseally installed on system and I try to do my best. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 13:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161359.m3GDxJ6p031348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-04-16 09:59 EST ------- Thanks Adam for pointing out that. Updated package as below: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/bind-libbind.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/bind-libbind-9.3.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 14:12:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161412.m3GEC6SI013124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-16 10:12 EST ------- Some preliminary notes: I cannot install F-9 for now so I won't be able to test with F-9 openJDK-1.6 Testing with java >= 1.6 for now on x86_64. Ok the main problem with this package is about the content of make/lib/. According to the new packaging guidelines, we have to remove the bundled .jar and .class files. If removed, the current package doesn't build anymore (even if using your patch or defining ant -v -Dantlr.jar=$(build-classpath antlr) at build time. Suggested BR and Requires: BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6 BuildRequires: jpackage-utils >= 1.6 BuildRequires: ant, ant-contrib, ant-antlr (not sure for each of them). Requires: jpackage-utils >= 1.6 Requires: java >= 1.6 I wonder if ant-antlr will be Requested at runtime; maybe others will be needed. Suggested Group: Group: Development/Libraries Can you use %{_javadir} when appropriate (instead of %{_datadir}/java ). This make me think that gluegen uses a patched version of cpptasks, and i don't know how to force it to use the system one (if possible and relevant). Found some patches here to support ppc build: http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/debian/libj/libjogl-java/1.1.1~rc8-3/ I wonder if we need to add our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in java packages: gcc -c -fno-rtti -fPIC -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/include -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/include/linux /builddir/build/BUILD/gluegen/src/native/unix/UnixDynamicLinkerImpl_JNI.c [cc] cc1: warning: command line option "-fno-rtti" is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for C Since you have created a snapshot, it would be nicer if you can create a script to make this snapshot, remove the included .jar files, and fix (executable) permissions for most files. LICENSE.txt will need to be bundled. manual seems to be missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 15:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227946] Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161557.m3GFvCp3007036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stgit - StGIT provides similar functionality to Quilt on top of GIT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227946 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-16 11:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 15:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161558.m3GFwjqM027635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-16 11:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 16:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161635.m3GGZr4Q015863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-16 12:35 EST ------- Thanks, Lubomir! This package is APPROVED (by myself and Deepak Bhole). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 16:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161643.m3GGhCSB017583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-16 12:43 EST ------- New specs/srpms are here: Spec URL: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/libgphoto2.spec SRPM URL: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/libgphoto2-2.4.0-0.2.fc8.src.rpm Spec URL: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/gphoto2.spec SRPM URL: http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/gphoto2-2.4.0-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 16:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161639.m3GGdW13016679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-16 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Full review done: > > * This %define (luckily) does not seem to be used, please remove: > # Arches on which we need to prevent arch conflicts in gphoto2-config > %define multilib_arches %{ix86} ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x x86_64 Makes sense, removed. > * I suppose this using 0.x scheme is only for the review, and you will jump to > 1%{?dist} after review? > Release: 0.1%{?dist} Yup, the 0.x versioning is used just for review. > > * Source0: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/gphoto/libgphoto2-%{version}.tar.bz2 > > That is not the prefered form for a sf.net download url, that should be: > > Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gphoto/libgphoto2-%{version}.tar.bz2 > Updated. > * Is this really needed? : > ExcludeArch: s390 s390x > > I understand libgphoto is almost useless there, but it might be handy to still > have it so that applications which can use it don't have to have their specfiles > filled with %ifarch Ok, libgphoto2 is now compiled also for s390, s390x > * You should preserve the timestamps while converting the docs, so replace: > for i in AUTHORS COPYING; do > cp ${i} ${i}.old > iconv -f cp1250 -t utf-8 < ${i}.old > ${i} > rm -f ${i}.old > done > > with > for i in AUTHORS COPYING; do > mv ${i} ${i}.old > iconv -f cp1250 -t utf-8 < ${i}.old > ${i} > touch -r ${i}.old ${i} > rm -f ${i}.old > done Applied. > * License tag is wrong, the following source files are not LGPLv2+ > > GPLv2: > camlibs/adc65/adc65.c > > GPLv2+: > camlibs/fuji/fuji.c > camlibs/minolta/dimagev/* > camlibs/mustek/* > camlibs/stv0680/* > libgphoto2/exif.c > > LGPLv2: > camlibs/sipix/blink.c > > So the correct license lines would be: > # GPLV2+ for the main lib (due to exif.c) and most plugins, some plugins GPLv2 > License: GPLv2+ and GPLv2 > Fixed. > * The descriptions need to be updated for the fact that this package now only > contains a lib and no longer the gphoto2 application. > I grabbed the description from the README file, hope it's sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 16:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161641.m3GGfS3R004978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-16 12:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Note, these 2 remarks are valid for the separate gphoto2 itself too: > > * This %define (luckily) does not seem to be used, please remove: > # Arches on which we need to prevent arch conflicts in gphoto2-config > %define multilib_arches %{ix86} ia64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x x86_64 Ok, I fixed it on the gphoto2 side as well. It really doesn't make sense any more :) > * Is this really needed? : > ExcludeArch: s390 s390x > I'd keep it for gphoto2, Fedora is not built for s390(x) anyway so it doesn't affect it and eases the Fedora -> RHEL move. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 16:54:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161654.m3GGsmaJ020194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-16 12:54 EST ------- Another bug: perl.so ends up in the main package, should be in the perl subpackage (whatever it is called). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 16:56:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161656.m3GGuf0v020996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-16 12:56 EST ------- A misc issue - BR: xmms-libs is redundant as BR: xmms-devel pulls this. And I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442295] Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161704.m3GH4ZTW022790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-16 13:04 EST ------- Thanks for the Review. I wonder if we should include more documentation like nautilus-share does, but IMO it's not necessary because the README is very clear about the setup New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: thunar-shares Short Description: Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba Owners: cwickert Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: kevin Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161708.m3GH8uhS010676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-04-16 13:08 EST ------- Build success for devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=568946 Build success for F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=568958 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254060] Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161717.m3GHHoi8012784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-epplets - Epplets for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254060 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-16 13:17 EST ------- Thanks again! Packages koji built, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:24:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442297] Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161724.m3GHOtla014350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lft - Layer Four Traceroute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442297 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-04-16 13:24 EST ------- traceroute -A -T is essentially equivalent and already in. Killing this request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 17:24:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161724.m3GHOxHD027567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-04-16 13:24 EST ------- Come one, so many people have looked at this one already. It should be an easy review now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 18:09:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161809.m3GI9dZX004806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-16 14:09 EST ------- Note: As F-9 development is now frozen, pysvn is not pushed to F-9 repository automatically. - If you want to have pysvn pushed to F-9 repository at the same time F-9 is formally released, ask Release Engineering team ( rel-eng_AT_fedoraproject.org ) to add pysvn to f9-final package ( however it may be that rel-eng team does not want to add new packages without some _special_ reasons anymore ) - If rel-eng team rejects it, please visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and request to push your F-9 pysvn package to repository as "a update". Note that for now only F-7/F-8 updates requests are being accepted. F-9 updates requests will be open perhaps about one week before F-9 formal release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 18:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161822.m3GIMLgm007586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-16 14:22 EST ------- This review request will be closed if no response from the reporter is received with in ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 18:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433477] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161823.m3GINCxF026814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-16 14:23 EST ------- This review request will be closed if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 18:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161830.m3GIUDp7009522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-16 14:30 EST ------- All good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 18:41:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161841.m3GIfX9Z012285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-04-16 14:41 EST ------- Hey Jarod, I believe I followed the instructions we wrote about a couple weeks ago, but haven't heard much since then. Is there anything I'm missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161901.m3GJ1VVG003409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-16 15:01 EST ------- Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161923.m3GJNNmu022706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-16 15:23 EST ------- Rebuild failed on dist-f9 (I just tried to rebuild this package and did not do anything else!) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=569167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:28:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161928.m3GJSOIT009509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dledford at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-16 15:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #63) > (In reply to comment #62) > > > mpich2-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative > > /usr/share/mpich2/bin32/mpif90/usr/bin/mp32-mpif90 > > (and same for mpif77, mpicc, mpicxx). > > > I've fought with this in the past, I can't find a means of dealing with it > sanely, suggestions welcomed. I believe it can be ignored. > > > Lots of: > > > > mpich2-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > > /etc/mpich2-32/mpe_callstack_ldflags.conf > > > I think these can be safely ignored too, as most of them are constructed at > build-time. See the patch I'll be attaching to fix these, and do proper line wrapping of the description. > Good point. It seems you've not noticed I did enabled dynamically loading sock, > ssm, and shm channels; the default is still the sock channel though. > I'm actually considering configuring the package to use ch3:nemesis on x86*, > since it said to offer the best performance, thoughts? Hadn't notice, but that's nice. Can you build nemesis as another option but not as the default? Otherwise, I'd skip it for now. > > Another thing to think about it who should take precedence among lam, openmpi, > > and mpich2 when they are all installed. > > It really shouldn't matter, anyone who will knowingly install the three, should > be knowledgeable enough to set the default implementation, IMHO. Willing to agree, but I'm going to CC the lam/openmpi maintainer to get his take. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:29:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161929.m3GJTl8D023936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-16 15:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302656) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302656&action=view) Patch to spec file to fix rpmlint warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:32:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161932.m3GJWDHF024776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-16 15:32 EST ------- In fact I did not try to build it on dist-f9 as it wasn't released yet and I don't have an available machine for tests (not even virtualization). I'll try to build it in Fedora 9 as soon as I can. By the way, I thought review for inclusion in F8 and F9 were 2 different processes, that's why I submitted it after having built it in only F8. Sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] New: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx at krakoa.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet-0.1.7.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Time tracking for masses in GNOME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161939.m3GJdhLb012058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-04-16 15:39 EST ------- I would like to point out that the license may change. It is currently being investigated (see http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00163.html). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 19:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804161942.m3GJgsB0013130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 svidal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From svidal at redhat.com 2008-04-16 15:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: preupgrade Short Description: Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade Owners: skvidal, wwoods, katzj Branches: F7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes Requesting just the F7 branch addition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 20:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162008.m3GK8v89032532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-04-16 16:08 EST ------- I should note that I've made significant changes to lam/openmpi that aren't reflected in Fedora yet. The most important of which is dumping the alternatives usage entirely. It has proven to be unwieldy at best, a nightmare at worst. Instead, my current packages use mpi-selector. You can find mpi-selector, openmpi, and lam packages for the upcoming rhel5.2 release that demonstrate what I'm talking about (and intending to bring into fedora after f9 is released) at my Infiniband package page: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/rhel5.2 Also of note is that, in line with the comments in comment #7 and comment #8, my current packages use %{_libdir}/%{name} as the prefix for all files in the lam package, and %{_libdir}/%{name}/%{version}-%{opt_cc} as the prefix for all files in openmpi (the difference being because I've never been given any requests to have more than one version or compiler of lam installed at a time, but I have been given requests to have multiple versions and multipler compilers of openmpi at the same time). Another item of note is that I have outstanding requests to also include mvapich/mvapich2 in the distro for use over infiniband. I've not gotten any requests for mpich, but then I'm not fully aware of the relationship between mpich and mvapich. However, that does raise the question in my mind of redundancy (I'm not talking about redundant MPI implementations...we're already at the stage of ludicrous there, I'm wondering is mvapich a later version of mpich, are they the same code base, or is the naming similarity coincidence). If these packages are redundant, then would it not be better to use mvapich (which I think supports more of the high speed interconnects natively, but I could be wrong)? If they aren't, then ignore that issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 20:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162015.m3GKFqh4001743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-16 16:15 EST ------- See https://www.uitwisselplatform.nl/frs/?group_id=53 for disktype to support libewf. The libewf license in F-9 (BSD) allow disktype to use libewf whereas BSD with advertising (F-8 version) doesn't allow this. I don't know if the upstream disktype maintainer could add this patch thought. (there isn't much movement in the SF cvs)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 20:24:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162024.m3GKO3jX022046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-16 16:24 EST ------- The problem isn't with ETL but with synfig using ETL. I cannot approve ETL if the dependent package that is supposed to be useful fails. (at least on Rawhide x86_64) I will give a retry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 20:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162027.m3GKRPr5004320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-16 16:27 EST ------- Of course you're correct; I keep meaning to revisit some of these really old review tickets but I have had trouble finding the time lately. I will try to revisit this as soon as I have sufficient time to do so, but of course anyone else is welcome to take care of it first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 20:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162027.m3GKRQha022993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-16 16:27 EST ------- No news, any advices to add pkgconfig support for sox-devel ? A fixed support for libtool-ltdl-devel could be nice also... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 20:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162046.m3GKkP4p027084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-16 16:46 EST ------- James: ping? Is there anything you need from me in order to get this into the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162103.m3GL33wl012526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-16 17:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #66) > I should note that I've made significant changes to lam/openmpi that aren't > reflected in Fedora yet. The most important of which is dumping the > alternatives usage entirely. It has proven to be unwieldy at best, a nightmare > at worst. Instead, my current packages use mpi-selector. Ah, great, yet another tool for manipulating environment variables. And one with a domain specific name. I'm all for dropping alternatives, it's definitely crap for situations like this. But have you thought about using Modules (environment-modules in Fedora)? It's a general purpose environment manipulation tool. > Also of note is that, in line with the comments in comment #7 and comment #8, my > current packages use %{_libdir}/%{name} as the prefix for all files in the lam > package, and %{_libdir}/%{name}/%{version}-%{opt_cc} as the prefix for all files > in openmpi (the difference being because I've never been given any requests to > have more than one version or compiler of lam installed at a time, but I have > been given requests to have multiple versions and multipler compilers of openmpi > at the same time). That's good. However for such a scheme makes it into Fedora, I think it's going to need to go through the packaging committee. You run into all kinds of FHS violations as enforced by rpmlint like: openmpi.i386: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/openmpi/1.2.5-gcc/etc/openmpi-default-hostfile openmpi-libs.i386: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/openmpi/1.2.5-gcc/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.0.0.0 openmpi-libs.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/openmpi/1.2.5-gcc/lib/libmpi_cxx.so.0.0.0 > Another item of note is that I have outstanding requests to also include > mvapich/mvapich2 in the distro for use over infiniband. > If these packages are redundant, then would it not be better to use mvapich > (which I think supports more of the high speed interconnects natively, but I > could be wrong)? Well the FAQ says: What is MVAPICH/MVAPICH2? MVAPICH is a high performance implementation of MPI-1 over InfiniBand based on MPICH1. MVAPICH2 is a high performance MPI-2 implementation based on MPICH2. High performance and scalable support over the Verbs Level Interface (VAPI) are provided by these packages. These packages also support other underlying transport interfaces (such as the emerging uDAPL, OpenIB/Gen2 and the standard TCP/IP) for portability across multiple networks. And the download pages says: MVAPICH2 1.0.2p1 is available as a single integrated package (with MPICH2 1.0.5p4) for download. Now, whether and an installed MVAPICH2 provides a pure superset of MPICH2 capabilities remains to be seen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:29:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439117] Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162129.m3GLTHpM017877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preupgrade - Preresolves dependencies and prepares a system for an upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439117 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-16 17:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442295] Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162131.m3GLVgK7004573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-16 17:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162134.m3GLYukP004825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-04-16 17:34 EST ------- Both the lam and openmpi packages on my site support environment-modules in addition to the mpi-selector functionality. And yes, the file layout violates FHS. However, this layout seems to violate it the least while not creating a hodgepodge of binary names and symlinks in /usr/bin and other nasties like that. If it weren't forbidden for a distribution to ship software that installs in /opt, I would say that we should can the whole idea of putting this stuff in /usr and just use /opt/%{name}/%{version}/%{opt_cc} for these things. They are built by upstream with many assumptions that lend them to that layout well, and make a FHS layout a nightmare. It's a case of what's the least evil way to solve the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:54:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442808] Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162154.m3GLsMd0008567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442808 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442640] Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162154.m3GLsN39008593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442808 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442808] New: Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442808 Summary: Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stlwrt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epsilon-goes-rawhide/epsilon.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epsilon-goes-rawhide/epsilon-0.3.0.012-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMs for i386 and x86_64 built in mock: http://rpm.scwlab.com/epsilon-goes-rawhide/ Description: This is a small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library. The lib itself conforms to the standard put forth by freedesktop.org RPMLint spits out only W: no-documentation because documentation is absent upstream, and optional xine plugin package shouldn't have any documentation anyway. Included command line tools work as expected, therefore lib itself also works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162156.m3GLutX5023488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-16 17:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302678) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302678&action=view) pkgconfig config file wrapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442640] Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162155.m3GLtLBf023250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162155.m3GLtLVK023275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442640 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442808] Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162154.m3GLs70G022609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442808 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 21:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162155.m3GLtrxR023367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-16 17:55 EST ------- I won't accept a package that ships binary named PathFinder or calculator. There should be dots at the end of the %description texts. Why the Requires: bzip2, zlib The libs should be auto-detected, so why this Requires? For the .pc patch, unless I am missing something, there are still some libs that are only linked through fox (though the double quote seems to confuse pkgconfig, and now the libs needed when statically linking are not present anymore. In my opinion, it should end up like (also note that the double quotes should not be there, I removed them): .... LIBS=@LIBS@ FOX_LIBS=-lFOX- at FOX_MAJOR_VERSION@. at FOX_MINOR_VERSION@ X_LIBS=@X_LIBS@ X_BASE_LIBS=@X_BASE_LIBS@ X_EXTRA_LIBS=@X_EXTRA_LIBS@ GL_LIBS=@GL_LIBS@ Name: FOX Description: The FOX Toolkit URL: www.fox-toolkit.com Version: @FOX_MAJOR_VERSION at .@FOX_MINOR_VERSION at .@FOX_PATCH_LEVEL@ Libs: ${FOX_LIBS} Libs.private: ${X_LIBS} ${X_BASE_LIBS} ${X_EXTRA_LIBS} ${GL_LIBS} ${LIBS} Cflags: -I${includedir} Also the fedora opt flags are not used. With a release, the autoconf call is not needed (and may be harmful). Regarding the fox-config file, I think it should better be completly rewritten as a pkgconfig wrapper. I'll attach it. You can then propose it to upstream to install it as, for example fox-config-pkgconfig, and then in the fedora package you ship fox-config-pkgconfig as fox-config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 22:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162200.m3GM0O5L024501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-16 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #64) > > > > > Lots of: > > > > > > mpich2-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > > > /etc/mpich2-32/mpe_callstack_ldflags.conf > > > > > I think these can be safely ignored too, as most of them are constructed at > > build-time. > > See the patch I'll be attaching to fix these, and do proper line wrapping of the > description. > Thanks for the patch. However, I want the *.conf to be without noreplace; those configurations are supposed to change on version upgrades. I've already tried to wrapped the description around at column 80, I'll take your patch for it anyways. > > Good point. It seems you've not noticed I did enabled dynamically loading sock, > > ssm, and shm channels; the default is still the sock channel though. > > I'm actually considering configuring the package to use ch3:nemesis on x86*, > > since it said to offer the best performance, thoughts? > > Hadn't notice, but that's nice. Can you build nemesis as another option but not > as the default? Otherwise, I'd skip it for now. > No, the dynamic loading scheme doesn't support the nemesis channel for now. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2-1.0.7-4.fc9.src.rpm ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/mpich2/mpich2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 22:07:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162207.m3GM7dr0011734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-16 18:07 EST ------- Regarding the license isn't it LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+? In any case, the library seems to be covered by LGPL while the binaries are GPL covered, so it should be along: For main package License: LGPLv3 Nothing for the devel package (same license) For adie, calculator... License: GPLv3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 22:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162216.m3GMGMDY013386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-16 18:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #66) > I should note that I've made significant changes to lam/openmpi that aren't > reflected in Fedora yet. The most important of which is dumping the > alternatives usage entirely. It has proven to be unwieldy at best, a nightmare > at worst. Instead, my current packages use mpi-selector. You can find > mpi-selector, openmpi, and lam packages for the upcoming rhel5.2 release that > demonstrate what I'm talking about (and intending to bring into fedora after f9 > is released) at my Infiniband package page: > > http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/rhel5.2 > I'll work on implementing it for mpich2 once its available in fedora. > Also of note is that, in line with the comments in comment #7 and comment #8, my > current packages use %{_libdir}/%{name} as the prefix for all files in the lam > package, and %{_libdir}/%{name}/%{version}-%{opt_cc} as the prefix for all files Do you actually ship openmpi with multiple versions and compilers on RHEL? I saw your use of the %{opt_cc} sometimes ago and copied it for mpich2, but I don't think its necessary for Fedora builds, as one can build with gcc and we can only carry a version at a time. I believe the second option in comment #7 (which is what I'm using now) works fine for the multilib situation, which is farthest multiple instance Fedora can allow now. > in openmpi (the difference being because I've never been given any requests to > have more than one version or compiler of lam installed at a time, but I have > been given requests to have multiple versions and multipler compilers of openmpi > at the same time). > > Another item of note is that I have outstanding requests to also include > mvapich/mvapich2 in the distro for use over infiniband. I've not gotten any > requests for mpich, but then I'm not fully aware of the relationship between > mpich and mvapich. mvapich is one of several other projects that are built on top of mpich2. There is no reason why it can be packaged/shipped independently of mpich2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 22:48:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162248.m3GMmj4q000401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dledford at redhat.com 2008-04-16 18:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #70) > > Also of note is that, in line with the comments in comment #7 and comment #8, my > > current packages use %{_libdir}/%{name} as the prefix for all files in the lam > > package, and %{_libdir}/%{name}/%{version}-%{opt_cc} as the prefix for all files > > Do you actually ship openmpi with multiple versions and compilers on RHEL? With multiple compilers, no, and I never will. It's there as a convenience item for those people that want to build their own version with a different compiler. Although, in order to have both the mainline and another compiler version installed at the same time they should really add the %{opt_cc} marker into Name: as well (I didn't do that for gcc since I consider that the default). > I saw > your use of the %{opt_cc} sometimes ago and copied it for mpich2, but I don't > think its necessary for Fedora builds, as one can build with gcc and we can only > carry a version at a time. We can only carry a version at a time in the repo, but that doesn't mean that a user can't configure yum/rpm to treat openmpi as an installonly item (like the kernel). Since I've had people tell me they need the ability to install specific versions for certain certified apps, but also want the most up to date version for their own apps, that's the rationale behind keeping the version tag in the directory path for the prefix. > I believe the second option in comment #7 (which is > what I'm using now) works fine for the multilib situation, which is farthest > multiple instance Fedora can allow now. > > > in openmpi (the difference being because I've never been given any requests to > > have more than one version or compiler of lam installed at a time, but I have > > been given requests to have multiple versions and multipler compilers of openmpi > > at the same time). > > > > Another item of note is that I have outstanding requests to also include > > mvapich/mvapich2 in the distro for use over infiniband. I've not gotten any > > requests for mpich, but then I'm not fully aware of the relationship between > > mpich and mvapich. > > mvapich is one of several other projects that are built on top of mpich2. There > is no reason why it can be packaged/shipped independently of mpich2. Well, that wasn't really my point. My question was, assuming you have mvapich/mvapich2 available in fedora, then do we need mpich/mpich2? Is there any compelling reason for it? (Not that I object if you want to do the work, just asking) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 23:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162329.m3GNT8WD026628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2008-04-16 19:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #71) > > Well, that wasn't really my point. My question was, assuming you have > mvapich/mvapich2 available in fedora, then do we need mpich/mpich2? Is there > any compelling reason for it? I've just browse through its source and notice mvapich2 really seems to be a superset of mpich2, but I'm not so sure how much it support the commodity tcp/ip stack. I guess if we have mvapich2, mpich2 wouldn't be so necessary then; only that mvapich2 release will always be lagging behind mpich2's. The current mvapich2-1.0.2p1 ships with mpich2-1.0.5p4, while the latest upstream is at mpich2-1.0.7 . > (Not that I object if you want to do the work, > just asking) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 16 23:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804162353.m3GNrSD2031079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 iphands at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(iphands at gmail.com)| ------- Additional Comments From iphands at gmail.com 2008-04-16 19:53 EST ------- Please excuse my absence... I have recently switched email addresses and have been busy. I do want to continue working on this as I feel this project will be used by some and it is an easy way for me to contribute to a project that gives the open source (one that I use, and depend on) alot. I wonder though; if because review requests are filed as bugs, it would be better for this to actually be closed and I can resubmit it after I have done some more work (and have a more time to dedicate to it). Is it bad to have one open while waiting on a sporadic contributer? Either way I don't mind. That being said I need to be pointed in the (general) direction of problem or documentation. I think I really need to go in and mess with the Makefile via the configure script so that it accepts rpm specific environment variables. How is the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT passed from rpmbuild to ./configure or make does it set BASH environment variable? I think the only reason the spec build was working for me is because I was root and thus stuff was getting installed on the system instead of in the proper temporary build root. Sorry if some of my rambling is hard to follow. Thanks, -Ian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 00:47:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170047.m3H0lROg008791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From pabs3 at bonedaddy.net 2008-04-16 20:47 EST ------- Can you paste the build errors or a link to them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 00:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170056.m3H0uujR024352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-16 20:56 EST ------- Your spec has a lot of missing BR: gettext perl(XML::Parser) gtk2-devel gnome-python2-applet and it also has a problem with %files: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/hamster-applet-0.1.7.3-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/python2.5/s ite-packages/* Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/Configuration.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/Configuration.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/Configuration.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/KeyBinder.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/KeyBinder.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/KeyBinder.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/about.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/about.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/about.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/activities.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/activities.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/activities.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/add_custom_fact.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/add_custom_fact.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/add_custom_fact.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/applet.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/applet.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/applet.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/charting.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/charting.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/charting.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/db.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/db.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/db.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/defs.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/defs.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/defs.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/dispatcher.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/dispatcher.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/dispatcher.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/eds.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/eds.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/eds.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/keybinder/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/keybinder/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/keybinder/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/keybinder/_keybinder.la /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/keybinder/_keybinder.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/stats.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/stats.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/stats.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/storage.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/storage.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/storage.pyo /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/stuff.py /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/stuff.pyc /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/hamster/stuff.pyo It looks like you need to patch the install script to place files in the correct folder, now it enforces /usr/lib (and fails on x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 03:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441086] Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170349.m3H3nqvJ012835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ezstream - Command line source client for Icecast media streaming servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441086 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-16 23:49 EST ------- ezstream-0.5.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 03:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170354.m3H3somi014825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-16 23:54 EST ------- python-textile-2.0.11-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 03:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170355.m3H3t1AM014890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-16 23:55 EST ------- python-textile-2.0.11-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 03:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170354.m3H3sICM014691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-16 23:54 EST ------- mediawiki-HNP-1.1.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 03:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170351.m3H3pCUr013761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-16 23:51 EST ------- mediawiki-openid-0.8.2-7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mediawiki-openid'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 03:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439345] Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170356.m3H3uCCl016212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HNP - An extension to provide a hierarchical namespace permissions system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439345 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-16 23:56 EST ------- mediawiki-HNP-1.1.2-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 05:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435578] Review Request: unison227 - File synchronization tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170530.m3H5UHsW001318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison227 - File synchronization tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435578 s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |unison227-2.27.57-7.fc8.2 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-17 01:30 EST ------- his package is now in F7 stable, F8 stable, and devel, hence closing out this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 05:29:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison213 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170529.m3H5TDm0000843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison213 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |unison213-2.13.16-9.fc8.2 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-17 01:29 EST ------- This package is now in F7 stable, F8 stable, and devel, hence closing out this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 05:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:32:11 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170532.m3H5WBJO001678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-17 01:32 EST ------- FYI, official release 0.20 is out now, which includes everything this review was waiting on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 05:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170551.m3H5pDRX018252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-04-17 01:51 EST ------- based on my understanding, i dont see any reason for a person to install both i386 and x86_64 version, in my box. will merge back librep-common into librep. librep is a scripted language, and relevant bindings to run all know application (to me) can be installed natively on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 05:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170558.m3H5w6KN006264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-17 01:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgphoto2 Short Description: Library for accessing digital cameras Owners: jnovy Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 06:37:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170637.m3H6beOo027025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2008-04-17 02:37 EST ------- new versions of the src rpm and the spec are available for review that should fix the issues. http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/tinyproxy/tinyproxy-1.6.3-2.fc8.src.rpm http://jjh.fedorapeople.org/tinyproxy/tinyproxy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 06:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170657.m3H6vX1F017238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 02:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I wonder though; if because review requests are filed as bugs, it would be > better for this to actually be closed and I can resubmit it after I have done > some more work (and have a more time to dedicate to it). Is it bad to have one > open while waiting on a sporadic contributer? Either way I don't mind. Usually if you don't have time to continue a review request, the bug should be closed so that someone else can open a new review request. > That being said I need to be pointed in the (general) direction of problem or > documentation. I think I really need to go in and mess with the Makefile via the > configure script so that it accepts rpm specific environment variables. When you try "rpmbuild --rebuild XXXX.src.rpm" build.log says: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35898 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can check how rpm specific variables are passed by seeing the shell script > I think the only reason the spec build was > working for me is because I was root Yes. > and thus stuff was getting installed on the > system instead of in the proper temporary build root. But actually the failing point is not that (according to the build.log:) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=570216&name=build.log ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Installing lib/unix/libdzcom.a to /var/tmp/dzcomm-0.9.9i-3.fc9-uaWW0k/lib /sbin/ldconfig /var/tmp/dzcomm-0.9.9i-3.fc9-uaWW0k/lib /sbin/ldconfig: Can't create temporary cache file /etc/ld.so.cache~ : Permission denied make: *** [install-lib] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.35898 (%install) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 06:59:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170659.m3H6xYbB030601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 02:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > In fact I did not try to build it on dist-f9 as it wasn't released yet and I > don't have an available machine for tests (not even virtualization). Rebuild fails also on dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=570219 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 07:18:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170718.m3H7IHew021354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-17 03:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opengrok Short Description: Source browser and indexer Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 08:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170813.m3H8Dre8032422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at deadbabylon.de ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-17 04:13 EST ------- Two small notes/questions: 1. Why does parcellite requires lxpanel? 2. I'm not really sure about this, but I think I would prefer a NotShowIn=KDE; in %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/%{name}-startup.desktop (because KDE already has a default clipboard manager) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 08:20:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170820.m3H8Kfnd001347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-17 04:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 2. I'm not really sure about this, but I think I would prefer a NotShowIn=KDE; > in %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/%{name}-startup.desktop (because KDE already has > a default clipboard manager) Uh. Ignore this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 08:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170827.m3H8RI29016264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-17 04:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Two small notes/questions: > > 1. Why does parcellite requires lxpanel? My bad. But on the other hand: We have no virtual provides for a "systray" or "notification area", so how do we make sure that one is installed? > 2. I'm not really sure about this, but I think I would prefer a NotShowIn=KDE; > in %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/%{name}-startup.desktop (because KDE already has > a default clipboard manager) I could replace "OnlyShowIn=GNOME;XFCE;" with "NotShowIn=KDE;" but I'm not sure if desktop-file-install likes it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 08:35:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] New: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/psiconv.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/psiconv-0.9.8-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: A conversion utility for Psion files. Builds: devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=570268 f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=570268 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 08:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170848.m3H8mxSm006417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-17 04:48 EST ------- Doing a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 08:50:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170850.m3H8o3xM020522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 09:17:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170917.m3H9HPaS025412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-04-17 05:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Two small notes/questions: > > > > 1. Why does parcellite requires lxpanel? > > My bad. But on the other hand: We have no virtual provides for a "systray" or > "notification area", so how do we make sure that one is installed? Good question. Maybe it is worth to bring this question to fedora-packaging-ml. For now I only see a few solutions: 1. explicit require a panel/systray (this may bother users which don't use this panel and it's also not clear if a systray is actually running when starting parcellite) 2. Enhance the description and point out that the user will need a running systray/panel to use parcellite 3. Don't include /usr/share/applications/fedora-parcellite.desktop and only autostart it (so you prevent the users to have a non-working menu entry when no systray is running). > > 2. I'm not really sure about this, but I think I would prefer a NotShowIn=KDE; > > in %{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/%{name}-startup.desktop (because KDE already has > > a default clipboard manager) > > I could replace "OnlyShowIn=GNOME;XFCE;" with "NotShowIn=KDE;" but I'm not sure > if desktop-file-install likes it. Please see comment #2. I've overseen the already given entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 09:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804170923.m3H9NK8l012887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-17 05:23 EST ------- Full review done: MUST FIX: --------- -Missing BuildRequires: ImageMagick-devel bc -The man page for psiconv-config should be in -devel -The doc files under /usr/share/psiconv should be moved to %doc of -devel, iow do this after make install: mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} _doc And then add: " %doc _doc/*" to %files of -devel -License should be GPLv2+ not GPLv2 as far as I can see, any particular reason you've used GPLv2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:02:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171002.m3HA2f0Z020518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |438546 nThis| | URL| |http://sylvain.le- | |gall.net/ocaml-gettext.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] New: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is the familiar 'gettext' library for OCaml programs. The upstream version (0.2.0) doesn't work with the latest OCaml compiler, but I've supplied a large patch upstream which fixes all the problems and upstream have promised a new release containing this patch real soon (will be 0.3.0). I was waiting for this release, but I can't wait any longer, hence this is based on the old version (0.2.0) + my large patch. The library depends on ocaml-camomile but that doesn't build on ppc64 (bug 438486). Since Camomile is a huge dependency and not necessarily desirable (most people will want to use just the basic functionality which is implemented using C gettext), I've split that part off into a subpackage which doesn't get built on ppc64. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-gettext-0.2.0-2rwmj20080321.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for i18n Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=570335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:18:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442871] Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171018.m3HAInZI023370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442867 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171018.m3HAIo5L023391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442871 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442871] Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171019.m3HAJ5pj023437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://et.redhat.com/~rjones | |/virt-top/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442871] New: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-top.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-top-1.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats This program is already in Fedora, but the upstream source package has now been split up so it now needs to be in a separate package. rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171033.m3HAXZj5006652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442873 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:33:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442705] Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171033.m3HAXY3P006631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442705 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442873 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:33:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171033.m3HAXXH2006611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442705, 442867 URL| |http://et.redhat.com/~rjones | |/virt-df/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:34:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171034.m3HAYZBR026137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-17 06:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Full review done: > > MUST FIX: > --------- > -Missing BuildRequires: ImageMagick-devel bc done > -The man page for psiconv-config should be in -devel done > -The doc files under /usr/share/psiconv should be moved to %doc of > -devel, iow do this after make install: > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} _doc > And then add: " %doc _doc/*" to %files of -devel done > -License should be GPLv2+ not GPLv2 as far as I can see, any particular reason > you've used GPLv2? > done SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/psiconv.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/psiconv-0.9.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442873] New: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-df.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-df-2.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Utility like 'df' for virtual guests This program is already in Fedora, but the upstream source package has now been split up so it now needs to be in a separate package. rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:42:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171042.m3HAgeup027991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |442867 URL| |http://et.redhat.com/~rjones | |/virt-ctrl/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171042.m3HAgfRm028011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442875 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 10:42:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442875] New: Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 Summary: Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-ctrl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/virt-ctrl-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Graphical management app for virtual machines This program is already in Fedora, but the upstream source package has now been split up so it now needs to be in a separate package. rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 11:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171125.m3HBPUDK016106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-17 07:25 EST ------- All good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 11:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171131.m3HBV7kV004463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-04-17 07:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: psiconv Short Description: A conversion utility for Psion files. Owners: huzaifas Branches: F-8, EL-5 InitialCC: huzaifas Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 12:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442244] Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171246.m3HCkpVp018767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 08:46 EST ------- Well, fotox is under rapid development and at the time I am writing this comment the latest version is 40. So: Would you ask the upstream developer to change installation scripts to autotool based ones ? - Current upstream-created "build" script does not accept compiler option - desktop file is created under an unexpected directory - Current installation process is rather manual Also - No license text is included in tarball (v40) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 13:04:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171304.m3HD4l9X022728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-17 09:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd-4.3.2-5.src.rpm * Thu Apr 17 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 4.3.2-5 - Put the perl bindings and plugin into a separate perl-Collectd package. Note AFAICT from the manpage, the plugin and Collectd::* perl modules must all be packaged together. ---- AFAICT all the Perl code must go into a single package because the perl.so (plugin) and the Perl bindings are used together. This is what ends up in the perl-Collectd module now: $ rpm -qlp /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/perl-Collectd-4.3.2-5.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Collectd /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Collectd.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Collectd/Unixsock.pm /usr/lib64/collectd/perl.so /usr/share/doc/perl-Collectd-4.3.2 /usr/share/doc/perl-Collectd-4.3.2/COPYING /usr/share/doc/perl-Collectd-4.3.2/MyPlugin.pm /usr/share/doc/perl-Collectd-4.3.2/collectd2html.pl /usr/share/doc/perl-Collectd-4.3.2/cussh.pl /usr/share/man/man3/Collectd::Unixsock.3pm.gz /usr/share/man/man5/collectd-perl.5.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 13:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171308.m3HD8IGE023739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-17 09:08 EST ------- Ooops, forgot to exclude perl.so from the main package ... Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/collectd-4.3.2-6.src.rpm * Thu Apr 17 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 4.3.2-6 - Exclude perl.so from the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 13:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171323.m3HDNnh8027052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 09:23 EST ------- Rebuild failed on dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=570545 Even after "BuildRequires: byacc" is added, build still fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=570565 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171420.m3HEKqfq007372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-17 10:20 EST ------- I'll take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171426.m3HEQklQ021491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(snecklifter at gmail. | |com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 10:26 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436704] Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171444.m3HEirrm011900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mapnik - a Free toolkit for developing mapping applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436704 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(snecklifter at gmail.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2008-04-17 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > ping? Hi Mamoru, Firstly, thanks very much for doing the review. I'm currently trying to patch out internal agg and tinyxml as per your comments but will probably have to liase with upstream. Patching out isn't the issue but whether the included versions differ from fedora agg/tinyxml which from my review so far they appear to. Other than that I have resolved all other issues and will hopefully be submitting an updated package within the week. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225745] Merge Review: fedora-logos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171444.m3HEir3U011928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: fedora-logos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225745 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rdieter at math.unl.edu | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171451.m3HEpmtv026754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide Bug 233603 depends on bug 233602, which changed state. Bug 233602 Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171451.m3HEpPDO026672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|overholt at redhat.com |fedora at matbooth.co.uk Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-17 10:51 EST ------- Nice job, Mat! A very clean package. Here's my review. Everything's good to go pending spot's legal approval of the fetching (see the last question below, spot). Assuming that is given the go-ahead, this package is APPROVED. MUST items that either have comments or need looking into: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) - the tarball I created using your script didn't have the same md5sum as yours, but a recursive diff of the exploded tarball resulted in no differences so I'll assume it's a timestamp thing ? specfile is legible - two grammar nit-picks (feel free to ignore my pedantry if you wish ;) : "URL based" -> "URL-based" "java" -> "Java" Questions: - does upstream not provide any build mechanism? - have you considered offering upstream your build.xml? - your signal-handling patch doesn't affect runtime, right? - is the script for fetching the source acceptable to Fedora "legal" (CCing spot)? To download myself I had to click through to accept the SPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:51:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171451.m3HEplD9026737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233602 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-17 10:51 EST ------- Since I withdrew guidance review (bug #233603), I'm going to withdraw this one too. Anyone is welcome to pick this up (to maintain) if they so desire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 14:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233603] Review Request: guidance - System administration tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171452.m3HEqYFq013750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guidance - System administration tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233603 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-17 10:52 EST ------- Good news and bad news. Bad news first: I'm going to withdraw this review request. My apologies for the time and effort spent on this so far. Good news: looks like much of what was former known as guidance, is getting some upstream love, and will likely be making an appearance on some shape or form in a future released of kde 4.x (4.1 or 4.2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:06:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442473] Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171506.m3HF6hdl017002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442473 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-17 11:06 EST ------- I don't think that this application is desktop specific. It works fine in fluxbox there is an icon appearing in the panel when I start it (though it should certainly not be launched automatically). Even when there is no systray in the window manager, it can still be used as a command-line application. Maybe it should only be said in the %description, something like "A systray is required for full functionality". Also the gtk-paste icon should be copied in that package, or depend on a package providing it. In the desktop file Application is not a valid Category anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:11:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171511.m3HFBUNN031695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-04-17 11:11 EST ------- Yea. After looking over the comments here i think the proper order should be: basesystem setup filesystem Now take glibc into the picture which currently Requires(Pre): basesystem. If we'd drop basesystem completely but added a Obsoletes: basesystem-x-y Provides: basesystem-x-y to setup and we should be set for updates. And newer glibc versions should change the Requires(Pre): basesystem to Requires(Pre): setup Sounds reasonable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171517.m3HFHp5P019545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-04-17 11:17 EST ------- Actually, glibc should have a Requires(Pre): filesystem to create the dependency chain properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225608] Merge Review: basesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171518.m3HFIujm000731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: basesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225608 ------- Additional Comments From pknirsch at redhat.com 2008-04-17 11:18 EST ------- Hm, and then the Obsoletes: basesystem-x-y Provides: basesystem-x-y needs to move into filesystem as well, too, otherwise older glibc versions would pull in the wrong package for the chain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:36:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] New: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jbowes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/eg.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/eg-0.70-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Easy Git (eg) is a wrapper for git, designed to make git easy to learn and use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] New: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: shawn.starr at rogers.com ReportedBy: shawn.starr at rogers.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com To get Fedora to support IP over Infiniband, we need to provide an addon package that will add some udev rules for infiniband devices (/dev/infiniband/*) These rules come from OFED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171544.m3HFiArS025000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-04-17 11:44 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/eg.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/eg-0.70-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 15:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171559.m3HFxSs4028077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at matbooth.co.uk Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at matbooth.co | |.uk) ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-17 11:59 EST ------- I'll take this. I can't build your current SRPM: + cd epic-0.6.22 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42670: line 33: cd: epic-0.6.22: Permission denied error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.42670 (%prep) There seem to be wacky permissions or something. Rather than doing this: ln -s %{_javadir}/jdom.jar %{_javadir}/antlr.jar %{_javadir}/gnu-regexp.jar %{_javadir}/brazil.jar . You could use build-jar-repository or build-classpath. I don't think it's a big deal either way, though. Otherwise, things look good! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 16:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437285] Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171653.m3HGrNQE020299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgphoto2 - Library for accessing digital cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437285 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-17 12:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 16:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171657.m3HGvqTt006984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Alias: ofed_fedora_10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 ------- Additional Comments From shawn.starr at rogers.com 2008-04-17 12:57 EST ------- *** Bug 442111 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 16:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442854] Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171656.m3HGuKRo006856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: psiconv : A conversion utility for Psion files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442854 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-17 12:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 16:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171659.m3HGx6tg021514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Alias: ofed_fedora_10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 shawn.starr at rogers.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 17:22:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175840] Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171722.m3HHMHtf012784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-17 13:22 EST ------- Enrico - Can we get this into EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171907.m3HJ7Hrd013613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 15:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302784) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302784&action=view) rpmlint log of dspam 3.8.0-22 Note: For general packaging guidelines you can refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Also, you can use rpmlint (in rpmlint package) to detect some general packaging errors. First of all: * backend modules - dspam-backend-XXX rpms installs dspam modules (I guess so) into %_libdir. This is not desired because * The installed modules contain lots of undefined non-week symbols (you can check this by $ rpmlint dspam-backend-hash , for example) so these binaries doesn't seem to be libraries. Also the symlink named XXXX.so in %_libdir (not in %_libdir/some_name/ ) should usually be in -devel package. * The installed modules have too generic names (like libmysql_drv.so) which will easily cause name space conflicts with other database-related packages. So * Please create some package specific directory (like %_libdir/%name) and move all modules into the directory. Then: * Macros - Please use macros properly. /usr/sbin -> %_sbindir, /usr/share -> %_datadir, for example * disttag - Please consider to use %?dist tag: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * Description - Remove author credit from %description * Inter-subpackages dependency - Dependency between subpackages should usually be EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific (unless it is virtual Provides/Requires) For example dspam-devel must have "dspam = %{version}-%{release}". * Requires - For dspam-devel package, please check the Requires you wrote are really needed. As far as I checked all of ---------------------------------------------------------------- Requires: mysql-devel zlib-devel glibc-devel openldap-devel postgresql-devel sqlite-devel Requires: %{name}-backend-mysql = %{version} Requires: %{name}-backend-pgsql = %{version} Requires: %{name}-backend-sqlite = %{version} Requires: %{name}-backend-hash = %{version} ---------------------------------------------------------------- is not needed and should be removed. - Packages containing pkgconfig .pc file must have "Requires: pkgconfig" ! Note for -devel subpackage * config.h - Installing autotool-generated header file named "config.h" is really undesirable and this should be avoided because this will easily cause name space conflict. * If config.h (and config_shared.h) are not needed, please simply remove these * If needed, rename these files and fix other header files so that #include macro don't cause any errors. * configure option - Some configure option seems disabled. Would you explain why? For example: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 439 checking whether to enable clamav... 440 no ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Initscripts http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript - initscripts service file must be installed under %_initrddir (expanded as /etc/rc.d/init.d) not under /etc/init.d. - Installed services must not be enabled by default (your installed dspam script has the line ---------------------------------------------------------------- 23 # chkconfig: 345 80 80 ---------------------------------------------------------------- which is not desired) - service script should (not must) have "reload" entry (for details, please refer to the wiki page above) * Scriptlets - needs fixing. Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups ! Please check in what order scriptlets are done: explained on "Scriptlet Ordering" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * Documents directory - You are using two documents directory: /usr/share/doc/dspam and /usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0. Please unify them unless impossible. * File lists - build log shows many files are listed twice: --------------------------------------------------------------- - 1446 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/admins 1447 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/default.prefs 1448 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/rgb.txt 1449 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/templates/nav_admin_error.html 1450 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/templates/nav_admin_preferences.html 1451 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/templates/nav_admin_status.html 1452 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/templates/nav_admin_user.html 1453 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/templates/nav_alerts.html 1454 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/templates/nav_analysis.html ....... -------------------------------------------------------------- The %files entry -------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_dspam_webapp} -------------------------------------------------------------- means the directory %_dspam_webapp itself and all files/directories/etc under %_dspam_webapp. - There is unowned directory: -------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/dspam/mysql/ dspam-backend-mysql-3.8.0-22.i386 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/dspam/ file /usr/share/doc/dspam is not owned by any package -------------------------------------------------------------- * rpmlint message - There are many rpmlint warning/errors. Please fix them unless you have some reasons which should be ignored. You can check what rpmlint means by -------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint -I symlink-should-be-relative -------------------------------------------------------------- for example. ! non-executable-script /usr/share/dspam/cgi-bin/configure.pl - non-executable script should not have shebang. ! script-without-shebang /usr/share/dspam/htdocs/base.css - scripts with executable permission (this file has 0755) should have shebang. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171911.m3HJBWMs014605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171920.m3HJK1li015768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-17 15:20 EST ------- This is a bit confusing; why is the ticket assigned to the reporter? It should be assigned to the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171921.m3HJLWI6016306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-04-17 15:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ffcall Short Description: Libraries for foreign function call interfaces Owners: gemi Branches: F-8 InitialCC: gemi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171924.m3HJObB4002697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-04-17 15:24 EST ------- Well it builds on x86_64, passes rpmlint. Looking at what it does, I have no reason to believe it won't work on my laptop. I tend to like Ville's solution better than distributing a 200MB src rpm. Too bad modification is not permitted, or we could just redistribute the 805KB wl_apsta.o firmware. Have you contacted Linksys about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171923.m3HJNkts002613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review at redhat.com AssignedTo|gemi at bluewin.ch |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |review at redhat.com | Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171949.m3HJnlgD021239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Alias: ofed_fedora_10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-17 15:49 EST ------- Is there a package to review here? Please post URLs to the srpm and specfile so the reviewers can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171949.m3HJnLlU021192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-17 15:49 EST ------- OK source files match upstream (diff between supplied archive and the one produced directly from git is empty) OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPL). License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide/X86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. rpmlint output: eg.noarch: I: checking eg.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/eg eg.src: I: checking This a common issue of packages with "bash completion" support where /etc/bash_completion.d directory owned by the package. Trigger based solution is mentioned at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ToshioKuratomi/TriggerScripts. package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 19:53:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804171953.m3HJrnDB007736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 fedora at matbooth.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-17 15:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Nice job, Mat! A very clean package. Here's my review. Everything's good to > go pending spot's legal approval of the fetching (see the last question below, > spot). Assuming that is given the go-ahead, this package is APPROVED. > Thanks. :-) > MUST items that either have comments or need looking into: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > * verify source and patches (md5sum matches upstream, know what the patches do) > - the tarball I created using your script didn't have the same md5sum as > yours, but a recursive diff of the exploded tarball resulted in no > differences so I'll assume it's a timestamp thing I didn't try md5sum, but you're right. The sum changes every time I run the download script. It strips out all the pre-built binaries and source that isn't used in the build or is licenced differently before tarballing. This can be done at build time instead if it's a problem. > ? specfile is legible > - two grammar nit-picks (feel free to ignore my pedantry if you wish ;) : > "URL based" -> "URL-based" > "java" -> "Java" > No problem, I'll change them. > Questions: > > - does upstream not provide any build mechanism? Yes, but their ant script is incomplete (missing Javadoc build, mostly). I think it'll be easier to maintain a separate script than to massively patch upstream's in this case. > - have you considered offering upstream your build.xml? I have now. I may shoot an email at their mailing list about it... > - your signal-handling patch doesn't affect runtime, right? That's the real question. I have only ever used brazil as part of the EPIC Perl Eclipse plugin and since that is the only package that uses it, I've only tested it as part of that. The is no, as far as I can tell. Eclipse is able to stop and start the brazil server and CGI process without problem for my CGI Perl projects. The reason for patch was to get it building on GCJ, however it does build without the patch on the OpenJDK. What would be the right thing do here, drop support for GCJ in favour of less modifications to the upstream code? > - is the script for fetching the source acceptable to Fedora "legal" (CCing > spot)? To download myself I had to click through to accept the SPL. I wanted to make it an easy and automated process, since I'm lazy like that. The SPL licence is included in the main package and the source files are each headed with licence information, though alternative download instructions could be included if I fail a Spot check. :-) Thanks for your time. PS, did you mean to assign the bug to me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 20:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172000.m3HK07oF009625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-17 16:00 EST ------- I thought I had to assign it back to him to indicate I couldn't build the SRPM. Should it stay assigned to me after I take the review? I've always been unclear on review bug assignments during the process and couldn't find anything on the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 20:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172024.m3HKO223029729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-17 16:24 EST ------- The path for python is hardcoded in the configure script (with /lib, not /lib64) so it doesn't build on 64 bits system. This should be fixed with this new spec file: http://dl.free.fr/jFioGRj4k/adonthell.spec And btw, this might make it build on F9 as well, but I still can't test it before next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 21:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172110.m3HLAW77022585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-17 17:10 EST ------- > * Using CVS > - If you want to use CVS: > * Please follow the section "Using Revision Control" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Fixed in new package: spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/xosview/xosview-1.8.3-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 21:10:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172110.m3HLApOV006756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-17 17:10 EST ------- Looks good. Still some little issues: * the comment explaining the tex(tex) BR is a bit wrong now, since it is also used to build the documentation. * I think it would be better to have another name for the config file, it is not very specific (especially for those who have a shared SOURCES directory), like dvipdfm-config. * I suggest using %makeinstall INSTALL='install -p' to keep timestamps. * There are Requires(post): /usr/bin/mktexlsr but it is not used. Since there are files in texmf_main, I guess that the calls should be done. * I think it is better to have rm dvipdft instead of rm -f dvipdft to be warned when upstream changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 21:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172113.m3HLDxHp023181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-04-17 17:13 EST ------- Oh, my apologies, I was unaware you were actually waiting on me now. One sec... Okay, done. Import at will! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 21:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172132.m3HLWWL9011324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Alias: ofed_fedora_10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 ------- Additional Comments From shawn.starr at rogers.com 2008-04-17 17:32 EST ------- Coming, there are some issues to work out as this will hopefully become a Fedora 10 Feature (pending approval) to get IB working properly in Fedora. This being a small step in that direction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 21:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172150.m3HLovI2030301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-04-17 17:50 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pysvn New Branches: F-8 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 21:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172158.m3HLw58i031383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-17 17:58 EST ------- Yes, the ticket should stay assigned to the reviewer pretty much permanently; the only situation I can think of when the assignment would change is when a review ticket is handed off to another reviewer, or assigned back to nobody at fp.org in the case that the reviewer is somehow removed from the process. > I've always been unclear on review bug assignments during the process and > couldn't find anything on the wiki. Well, there's http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess which pretty much sums it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 22:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441981] Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172248.m3HMm19G022629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chkrootkit - branches for EPEL needed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441981 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 22:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429715] Review Request: tcptrack - Displays information about tcp connections on a network interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172253.m3HMrHGY023385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcptrack - Displays information about tcp connections on a network interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429715 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-17 18:53 EST ------- closing the review, the package is already in rawhide's repos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 22:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430603] Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172258.m3HMwP4b024186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430603 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-17 18:58 EST ------- closing the bug, the package has been built and pushed to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 22:56:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172256.m3HMuWrG024000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-17 18:56 EST ------- nikolay, is there any problem which prohibits you to upload the package to CVS ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 22:58:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430377] Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172258.m3HMw2S6024128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: atop - An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and process level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430377 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-17 18:58 EST ------- closing the bug, the package is in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 22:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430603] Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172257.m3HMvdQ1007598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clex - A free file manager with a full-screen user interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430603 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 23:00:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172300.m3HN0l8T024851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |186858 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 23:03:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172303.m3HN3fj8025157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2008-04-17 19:03 EST ------- With some clarifications made in recent releases, I think if we exclude the emi_26_62 firmware we will probably be OK. See also http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-January/005702.html As soon as I get a mo I will do a fresh package which should be OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 17 23:48:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804172348.m3HNmJeR030957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-04-17 19:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocfs2-tools Short Description: Tools for managing the Ocfs2 cluster file system Owners: mfasheh Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 01:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442329] Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180134.m3I1YQ9Y028203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-lirc-properties - Infrared Remote Controls setup tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442329 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|gnome-lirc-properties: |Review Request: gnome-lirc- |Infrared Remote Controls |properties - Infrared Remote |setup tool |Controls setup tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 02:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180201.m3I21sM9016730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-17 22:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 02:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180208.m3I28tqm001065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-17 22:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 02:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180205.m3I25pwG000804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-17 22:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 03:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180301.m3I31DJP026879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-17 23:01 EST ------- Please also provide srpm. And would you place your spec/srpm on the URL from which we can directly download your files by "wget -N", for example? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 09:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180921.m3I9LxFa029600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 09:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180924.m3I9OkTg012638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-18 05:24 EST ------- I would like to request early branching for F-10 of libtheora Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libtheora New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 09:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804180925.m3I9PHna030446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-18 05:25 EST ------- I would like to request early branching for F-10 of SDL_sound Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: SDL_sound New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 11:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181139.m3IBdRdT022453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-04-18 07:39 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Dan! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 11:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181142.m3IBgnSR006320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-04-18 07:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eg Short Description: Git for mere mortals Owners: jbowes Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181227.m3ICRUqr016175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-18 08:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > I've always been unclear on review bug assignments during the process and > > couldn't find anything on the wiki. > > Well, there's http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess which pretty > much sums it up. I think I was confused because step 4 under "Reviewer" doesn't specify whether or not to re-assign to the submitter. IMO it would make sense to re-assign to the submitter when work is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435498] Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181232.m3ICWx1R002142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435498 Bug 435498 depends on bug 435496, which changed state. Bug 435496 Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435496 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435500] Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181233.m3ICX06A002167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435500 Bug 435500 depends on bug 435496, which changed state. Bug 435496 Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435496 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435498] Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181233.m3ICX4sw002200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435498 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:33 EST ------- I have left my role as a Fedora developer, thus closing as NOTABUG, SRPMS will be kept for interested parties to adopt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435496] Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181232.m3ICWvnR002114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435496 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:32 EST ------- I have left my role as a Fedora developer, thus closing as NOTABUG, SRPMS will be kept for interested parties to adopt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430393] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Multimedia tagging library for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181232.m3ICWhqJ002065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Multimedia tagging library for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430393 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:32 EST ------- Spot got another version of this into Fedora inspite of this review request being open for months. Also I have left my role as a Fedora developer, thus closing as NOTABUG, SRPMS will be kept for interested parties to adopt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:33:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435500] Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181233.m3ICXCpO017239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435500 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:33 EST ------- I have left my role as a Fedora developer, thus closing as NOTABUG, SRPMS will be kept for interested parties to adopt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:40:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181240.m3ICeM1x019019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 12:49:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181249.m3ICnMA9020363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-04-18 08:49 EST ------- Paul are you okay, it has been months and I am getting worried. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181302.m3ID2lNJ008405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Core |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:02 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hunspell New Branches: f-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:20:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181320.m3IDK5pp027669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:20 EST ------- 1.) Release: 1 Please include the dist tag http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7 2.) You use update-desktop-database and update-mime-database Please depend on required packages: Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils SPEC file seems sane in all other respect. Will continue review once mock build finishes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181319.m3IDJjL7011721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora at matbooth.co.uk |overholt at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The reason for patch was to get it building on GCJ, however it does build > without the patch on the OpenJDK. What would be the right thing do here, drop > support for GCJ in favour of less modifications to the upstream code? I think what you've done is fine. If someone notices problems with brazil on its own, we can always revert the patch. Please post new URLs when you have them for the grammatical changes (if you're going to change them ... they're not blockers). spot: I'm putting the ball in your court here for a decision on the click-through situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:20:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181320.m3IDKxLI027909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:20 EST ------- 3.) mock build fails, probably due to lacking dependency on perl(XML::Parser): checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181326.m3IDQCR2029048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:26 EST ------- 4.) rpmlint: $ rpmlint -i audit-viewer-0.2-1.src.rpm audit-viewer-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm audit-viewer-debuginfo-0.2-1.x86_64.rpm audit-viewer.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. audit-viewer.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/libexec/audit-viewer-server /usr/bin/consolehelper Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. audit-viewer.x86_64: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. audit-viewer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. The URL tag is not a problem for now given what the comment above URL tag says. However you should correct the absolute symlink. Have you considered using PolicyKit instread of consolehelper? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:32:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181332.m3IDWRa4014655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 1.) Release: 1 > Please include the dist tag The linked document states the dist tag is optional. Is it really necessary? > 2.) You use update-desktop-database and update-mime-database > > Please depend on required packages: > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets recommends not to depend on these packages - to allow installing the package in non-GNOME environments without dragging these packages in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181342.m3IDgDYt017009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:42 EST ------- 5.) One more thing: /usr/share/applications/audit-viewer.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 Please consider setting vendor to Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181339.m3IDdwfJ016253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > 1.) Release: 1 > > Please include the dist tag > The linked document states the dist tag is optional. Is it really necessary? Common practice is to include it for packages that contains code that is linked to other packages in the distribution. It is usually ommited in content-only packages, such as clip art gallery or firmware packages. Moreover, it simplifies updating the branches with bugfixes, see the paragraph below. Given the guidelines do not require the dist tag, this won't block the package approval. But I encourage you to reconsider its use. > > 2.) You use update-desktop-database and update-mime-database > > > > Please depend on required packages: > > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets recommends not to > depend on these packages - to allow installing the package in non-GNOME > environments without dragging these packages in. Oh, sorry. Ignore that then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181346.m3IDkhx0018094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-18 09:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Please post new URLs when you have them for the grammatical changes (if you're > going to change them ... they're not blockers). > Sure, I was just waiting to see if I needed to change anything else. SPEC and SRPM are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/brazil.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/brazil-2.3-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 13:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181351.m3IDpw3a002186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 09:51 EST ------- 1.) On 64 bit platforms files get installed into /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra This causes the build to break since they are not included in plist, and also causes the module not to work at all. They should get into %{_libdir}/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra instead 2.) Please consider usin dist tag 3.) %configure --disable-numpy Is there a reason to disable numpy? We have numpy in Fedora afaik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 15:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181546.m3IFk9tM029234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-18 11:46 EST ------- Thanks, Mat. Outside of spot's thoughts on the click-through situation, this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:00:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181600.m3IG0wfG031950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-18 12:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > > * Using CVS > > - If you want to use CVS: > > * Please follow the section "Using Revision Control" of > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > Fixed in new package: No, what I wanted to say here is that - You should create tarball from CVS repo by using tar instead of creating a huge diff between released tarball and CVS head. - Also you should follow "Snapshot packages" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines Also some other issues remain ( I will wait Gregory ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:20:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214764] Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181620.m3IGKMCD004524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell - split hunspell out from OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214764 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 12:20 EST ------- I assume you want a F-9 early branch here? cvs done. F-9 => what will go into F-9 deve => what will go into F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181622.m3IGMwU3024987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtheora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 12:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181620.m3IGKF6W024527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-18 12:20 EST ------- > No, what I wanted to say here is that > - You should create tarball from CVS repo by using tar instead of > creating a huge diff between released tarball and CVS head. Ok, that's much simpler :-) I will leave that to Gregory as there should enough information in the spec file to create the cvs tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:24:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355811] Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181624.m3IGOdIS005397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SDL_sound - Library handling decoding of several popular sound file formats Alias: SDL_sound https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355811 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 12:24 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181627.m3IGRCmZ026034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 12:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 16:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181628.m3IGSsAk006420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 17:37:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181737.m3IHbHHB020263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-18 13:37 EST ------- Each time you modify your package, you should increment the release number, and redo a .src.rpm and repost the link to the modified .src.rpm. There are some warnings about missing declarations corresponding with missing includes that should be fixed, if possible: eet_image.c: In function 'eet_data_image_lossless_convert': eet_image.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function 'htonl' eet_lib.c: In function 'eet_open': eet_lib.c:1173: warning: implicit declaration of function 'unlink' htonl: #include unlink: #include I suggest using make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep timestamps of installed files. The -devel subpackage should depend on pkgconfig. rpmlint is silent. The source timestamp is not kept: $ ls -l eet-0.9.99900.tar.bz2 ../SOURCES/eet-0.9.99900.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 pat pat 2788829 mar 31 22:08 eet-0.9.99900.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 pat pat 2788829 avr 4 14:21 ../SOURCES/eet-0.9.99900.tar.bz2 but match upstream: c9f75595152f571139df450314bdb5fc eet-0.9.99900.tar.bz2 Some documentation should be shipped, either in a -doc subpackage, or in the devel package. I suggest shipping doc/html/. You can use wget -N, or spectool -g. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 18:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181821.m3IILHpd030197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-18 14:21 EST ------- Well, it doesn't mention it because it's not something that's done. It would be a pretty long document if it had to indicate all of the things that you don't do. The submitter should know from the comments when there's something for them to do. If they don't respond, needinfo(reporter) works just fine. Keeping the ticket assigned lets everyone know who the package submitter is (since they show as "Reporter") and who the reviewer is (since they show up in "Assigned to"). Currently it looks like Mat is reviewing this ticket, which throws up various flags for the people like me who monitor these things. In any case, this really isn't the place to discuss changing the review process which has worked about as well as bugzilla will allow for a few thousand packages. If you want to have the procedure changed, you're welcome to bring it up on-list. Currently, though, if you are going to review this, please assign it to your self and set the fedora-review flag to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 18:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181841.m3IIfM8r001724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|fedora at matbooth.co.uk |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-18 14:41 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR since I already sponsored Mat for some other work he did on the Eclipse package. Mat: I still need an SRPM I can build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 18:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181856.m3IIuuEX005453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 14:56 EST ------- Both those items look fixed. I see no further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 19:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181914.m3IJEqOn029201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 jeremy at hinegardner.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeremy at hinegardner.org 2008-04-18 15:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tinyproxy Short Description: A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon Owners: jjh Branches: F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 19:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181945.m3IJj4W8003232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 15:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 19:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804181959.m3IJxpAb018609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|high |urgent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 20:30:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182030.m3IKU6hp026689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(lightsolphoenix at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-04-18 16:30 EST ------- Inactive. closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 20:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182035.m3IKZi59015360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-18 16:35 EST ------- Setting the CVS ? flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182103.m3IL39iQ021166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-18 17:03 EST ------- > 1.) On 64 bit platforms files get installed into > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra > > This causes the build to break since they are not included in plist, and also > causes the module not to work at all. They should get into > %{_libdir}/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra instead Fixed by using %python_sitelib for these files. I really should have tried an all-arch build :( An unfortunate side-effect is File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra on 32-bit architectures (once for %python_sitelib, once for %python_sitearch); I think that can be lived with. > 3.) %configure --disable-numpy > > Is there a reason to disable numpy? We have numpy in Fedora afaik. The package does not build with current numpy. Given that the last release of python-gtkextra happened four years ago, I'd prefer avoiding extensive patching (otherwise Fedora could become something like a new upstream for the package, and I currently don't care about it that much). If an user requests numpy support - or if you insist on it - I'll take a look and make it build (if not work), but I'd rather not. Other features of python-gtkextra that don't build were dealt with in the same manner - by removing them. New package is available at http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra-1.1.0-2.src.rpm , new spec file uploaded at the original URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182108.m3IL8KWm002151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-18 17:08 EST ------- Jaroslav: Is this your first package? I don't see you in the sponsored cvsextras group, at least not with this address. What is your Fedora Account System name? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 262401] Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182120.m3ILKgTd004946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcip-annotations - Java 5 thread safety annotations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-04-18 17:20 EST ------- Here are updated files that reflect the recently approved Java packaging guidelines. Spec: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations.spec SRPM: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/jcip-annotations/jcip-annotations-0-20060626.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:33:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182133.m3ILX92s027146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 17:33 EST ------- Does it work at all? It did not do for me when I used the package with changes equivalent to yours, until I moved the files to arch dependent destination. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285551] Review Request: idw-gpl - Java Swing based docking windows framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182134.m3ILYq5r007220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idw-gpl - Java Swing based docking windows framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285551 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-04-18 17:34 EST ------- Here are new versions that reflect the recently released Java packaging guidelines. Spec: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/idw-gpl/idw-gpl.spec SRPM: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/idw-gpl/idw-gpl-1.5.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 394871] Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182144.m3ILilkX029180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-04-18 17:44 EST ------- Here are new versions that conform to the recently released Java packaging guidelines. http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton-1.10r3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 21:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182148.m3ILm2mm010123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-18 17:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 4.) rpmlint: > audit-viewer.src: W: no-url-tag Added, now that audit-viewer is at fedorahosted.org > audit-viewer.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative > /usr/libexec/audit-viewer-server /usr/bin/consolehelper > Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. There's really no way to use that symlink in a chroot anyway: - There's no reason to use it to copy the consolehelper binary anywhere. - If you use the symlink to run audit-viewer-server, then consolehelper will access /etc/security/console.apps/audit-viewer-server, check users from /etc/passwd and run /usr/libexec/audit-viewer-server-real; this will all happen in the "top" root and it will happen the same whether the running consolehelper is /usr/bin/consolehelper or /chroot/usr/bin/consolehelper. OTOH using an absolute symlink somewhat protect us in case %{libexecdir} was moved. > Have you considered using PolicyKit instread of consolehelper? Briefly. Right now the privileged part is userhelper and roughly 300 lines of custom C code, and modifying the code to rely on libpolkit would probably not be a security improvement (although the PolicyKit features are somewhat compelling). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 22:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182203.m3IM3ETw013308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-18 18:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 3.) mock build fails, probably due to lacking dependency on perl(XML::Parser): > > checking for XML::Parser... > configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool Fixed. Sorry about that - I really should have noticed this myself. (In reply to comment #6) > 5.) One more thing: > > /usr/share/applications/audit-viewer.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group > "Desktop Entry" is deprecated Removed. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 > Please consider setting vendor to Fedora Fixed. New package at http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/audit-viewer-0.2-2.src.rpm ; spec file updated at the original URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 22:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182236.m3IMa8do007665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-18 18:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 4.) rpmlint: > > audit-viewer.src: W: no-url-tag > Added, now that audit-viewer is at fedorahosted.org Not really -- you just added a comment, not changed the URL tag. Given this is an upstream issue and relation between upstream and package is not relevant here, it can not block the review. I encourage you to upload the source to https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ and change the url tag respectively as described here: https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq > > > audit-viewer.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative > > /usr/libexec/audit-viewer-server /usr/bin/consolehelper > > Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. > There's really no way to use that symlink in a chroot anyway: > - There's no reason to use it to copy the consolehelper binary anywhere. > - If you use the symlink to run audit-viewer-server, then consolehelper > will access /etc/security/console.apps/audit-viewer-server, check users > from /etc/passwd and run /usr/libexec/audit-viewer-server-real; this will > all happen in the "top" root and it will happen the same whether the > running consolehelper is /usr/bin/consolehelper or > /chroot/usr/bin/consolehelper. > OTOH using an absolute symlink somewhat protect us in case %{libexecdir} was moved. I don't believe there's a guideline for these and was not able to find any. I see no more problems with the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 22:53:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] New: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/html2ps.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/html2ps-1.0-0.1.b5.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: An HTML to PostScript converter written in Perl. * Many possibilities to control the appearance. * Support for processing multiple documents. * A table of contents can be generated. * Configurable page headers/footers. * Automatic hyphenation and text justification can be selected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 18 23:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442522] Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804182304.m3IN4a5l024299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: audit-viewer - Audit event viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442522 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-18 19:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I encourage you to upload the source to https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ and > change the url tag respectively as described here: https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq Oh, i didn't know about that. Thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 00:17:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190017.m3J0Hdhu024269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-18 20:17 EST ------- * Sat Apr 19 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.9.99900-2 - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files - Added pkgconfig to -devel dependencies - Added html docs Missing includes are fixed in upstream trunk, new release candidate tarball will be released soon. I don't think patch is needed for current tarball because this bug doesn't impact anything - i'm building and runnings apps using this lib without any problems. New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/eet.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/eet-0.9.99900-2.fc9.src.rpm I will fix timestamps for other packages too, next week -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 00:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190025.m3J0PvCS005374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-18 20:25 EST ------- Hi, I don't think I should do a formal review yet, but I'll take a look soon if no one else does. (I used to maintain this on Debian a few years ago) Also, unless I'm mistaken there are still quite a few bugs in html2ps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 01:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190134.m3J1YKVF016499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-18 21:34 EST ------- Well, olpc2 seems to have only i386, however rebuild fails on dist-f9 x86_64 and I think this is worth fixing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=569171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 01:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190145.m3J1jbix018512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-18 21:45 EST ------- IMO in the Gnome/GTK world "Window theme" or "window style" is usually considered to be the content of the window, not the borders. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxappearance Short Description: Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 02:02:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190202.m3J227oh009142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-18 22:02 EST ------- Good catch, will fix that. More comments anywone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 06:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190630.m3J6UbPZ020939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-19 02:30 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Andrew and Deepak; thanks for CVS, Kevin; imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 07:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] New: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/pAgenda.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/pAgenda-3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A cross platform calendar and scheduler with the ability to use sqlite databases to manage multiple portable schedules. Also includes appointment and contact management abilities. rpmlint only gives pAgenda.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3-1 3.2-1.fc8 which I'm told is okay. Any comments/nitpicks much appreciated (I'm returning after about 6-8 months of not maintaining anything so I'm a little rusty) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 07:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190725.m3J7PuGg009111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-19 03:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > rpmlint only gives pAgenda.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3-1 3.2-1.fc8 which I'm told is okay. 2.3 is quite different from 3.2 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 07:48:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 03:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190748.m3J7mX9E012917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-19 03:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > rpmlint only gives pAgenda.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3-1 > 3.2-1.fc8 which I'm told is okay. > > 2.3 is quite different from 3.2 :) Oh doh! Thanks a lot, I've corrected it in my local version I don't see the point of uploading a -2 or anything for this, but it'll appear when imported or with other corrections. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 08:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190816.m3J8GoN1018984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 fedora at matbooth.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(fedora at matbooth.co| |.uk) | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-19 04:16 EST ------- I've had a stab (in the dark, since I can't seem to reproduce it) at fixing it. Also I've used build-jar-repository, that looks a lot cleaner. Thanks for the tip. Try these: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 08:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190819.m3J8JRO7007040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-19 04:19 EST ------- > - Added html docs >From spec install -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html install -p -m 644 doc/html/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html There is more elegant and correct way, just add html to the %doc line: %doc AUTHORS COPYING COPYING-PLAIN README html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 08:55:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442513] Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190855.m3J8t2sV025029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442513 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johan at x-tnd.be Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2008-04-19 04:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source file are ok. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + BuildRequires are proper. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 08:59:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190859.m3J8xvLN013589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-04-19 04:59 EST ------- Up -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 09:03:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442513] Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190903.m3J930Fj026565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442513 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-19 05:02 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Cache-Lite Short Description: Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP Owners: remi Branches: F-7, F-8, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 09:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190922.m3J9MGhl017773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 05:22 EST ------- Indeed, there is no utf8 support and quite a number of bugs opened in debian. I will have a look at time permits, but I don't think it is blocking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 09:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190936.m3J9aCBw032406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 05:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Missing includes are fixed in upstream trunk, new release candidate tarball > will be released soon. I don't think patch is needed for current tarball > because this bug doesn't impact anything - i'm building and runnings apps using > this lib without any problems. Alright. In my opinion it is indeed sufficient to have it fixed upstream. But the fact that it builds and run is not an argument, since what not having prototypes shows is that the compiler cannot replace those functions by macros that do, for example, bound checking or whatever. I mean, if the prototypes werre incorrect it would be much more problematic anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 09:56:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804190956.m3J9ubpr003251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 05:56 EST ------- The pkgconfig file is wrong, since it has Libs.private: -lz -ljpeg @winsock_libs@ -lm I am not sure that the zlib-devel requires is needed for the devel sub package, since the zlib and jpeg are linked through eet only, and there is no static eet lib (and there is certainly no need for a static eet library). And there is no reference to zlib, jpeg headers in th eet headers either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191003.m3JA3Klx024751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 06:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > - Added html docs > > From spec > install -d -m 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html > install -p -m 644 doc/html/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/html > > There is more elegant and correct way, just add html to the %doc line: > > %doc AUTHORS COPYING COPYING-PLAIN README html In fact it is already done in -devel. What happens is that the files installed by the above 2 commands are erased by the %doc command of the main package: Ex?cution_de(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.33007 + umask 022 + cd /home/dumas/RPM-fc/BUILD + cd eet-0.9.99900 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/eet-0.9.99900-2.fc9-root-dumas/usr/share/doc/eet-0.9.99900 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/eet-0.9.99900-2.fc9-root-dumas/usr/share/doc/eet-0.9.99900 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/eet-0.9.99900-2.fc9-root-dumas/usr/share/doc/eet-0.9.99900 So you just need to remove those commands and leave the %doc in -devel as you have done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:04:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191004.m3JA4rDa004576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 06:04 EST ------- You should stick with either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} but using both in the same spec is against the packaging policy. There are also two small errors in the desktop file - the Icon tag should either use the full path to the icon or the icon name without extension (wiki:Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) - according to the build log desktop-file-install complains because "key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character" The major problem is that you miss python as BR, which leads to [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qlp /home/wolfy/pAgenda-3.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm /images.py /usr/bin/pagenda which in turn gives [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ pagenda The file "images.py" was not found, it is needed to run pAgenda And I think there is also something else missing because once I start the application (after rebuilding with python added as BR), on the right side I get a page with raw HTML, which is quite different to what http://www.pcbypaul.com/software/screens/pagenda_screen1.png looks like in the same conditions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191011.m3JAB7HU026252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 nikolay at vladimiroff.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2008-04-19 06:11 EST ------- not any more. package built for devel and pushed for f-8 updates-testing. resolving as NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191018.m3JAIA1Z006801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-19 06:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > You should stick with either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} but using both in > the same spec is against the packaging policy. > > There are also two small errors in the desktop file > - the Icon tag should either use the full path to the icon or the icon name > without extension (wiki:Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) > - according to the build log desktop-file-install complains because "key > "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character" Both will be fixed in next upload > > The major problem is that you miss python as BR, which leads to > [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qlp /home/wolfy/pAgenda-3.2-1.fc9.noarch.rpm > /images.py > /usr/bin/pagenda > which in turn gives > [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ pagenda > The file "images.py" was not found, it is needed to run pAgenda > > And I think there is also something else missing because once I start the > application (after rebuilding with python added as BR), on the right side I get > a page with raw HTML, which is quite different to what > http://www.pcbypaul.com/software/screens/pagenda_screen1.png looks like in the > same conditions For these two I don't have mock at the moment (silly errors which I'm trying to fix), but okay, I can understand the first one, the second one I can't.... Can you please try: $ python >>> import wx.html as html Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191021.m3JALWCi027887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 06:21 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=302991) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=302991&action=view) see the right side of the image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:25:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191025.m3JAPuks008105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 06:25 EST ------- My pyhon-fu is close to nil, so please give me more details on how / when do that import and I'll gladly do that. If it matters, the command is successful (when run from command line) but I have no idea how to chain to /usr/bin/pagenda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 10:47:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 06:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191047.m3JAlPLd011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 ------- Additional Comments From arbiter at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-19 06:47 EST ------- i'm working on fixing the numerous packaging issues :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 12:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191211.m3JCBWgr026248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-19 08:11 EST ------- * Sat Apr 19 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.9.99900-3 - Cleaned up documentation installation - Removed unneded dependency on zlib-devel from eet-devel Removed manual installation of html docs zlib-devel is required by almost all packages that use eet so i put it as dependency for eet-devel, so i thought it's good idea to put it here. What's wrong with pkgconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 12:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191225.m3JCPUju028818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 08:25 EST ------- For the record: the program works OK in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 12:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191228.m3JCScJU017015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-19 08:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > rpmlint only gives pAgenda.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3-1 > 3.2-1.fc8 which I'm told is okay. > > 2.3 is quite different from 3.2 :) Fixed in this upload! (In reply to comment #4) > Both will be fixed in next upload Done > For these two I don't have mock at the moment (silly errors which I'm trying to fix), but okay, I can > understand the first one, the second one I can't.... Per discussion on IRC, fixed BR, will not build for F7 unless I find the issues before it is obsoleted Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/pAgenda.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/pAgenda-3.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 12:31:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191231.m3JCVrdP029940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 08:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > * Sat Apr 19 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.9.99900-3 > zlib-devel is required by almost all packages that use eet so i put it as > dependency for eet-devel, so i thought it's good idea to put it here. I don't think so, if a package directly requires zlib-devel it should do it, but if it requires it only through eet, it should not have be in the buildroot such that the build fails if zlib-devel is not build required. > What's wrong with pkgconfig? The @winsock_libs@ autoconf variable that is not substituted. $ pkg-config --static --libs eet @winsock_libs@ -leet -lz -ljpeg -lm In the fedora case it is not that problematic since there is no static libs, but it should be fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 12:55:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191255.m3JCtBCT001235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 08:55 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 07919d350874142e1ba8eda28e1a027ae3674d6e pAgenda_src-3.2.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64; package is noarch so it should work on any arch [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Does not display properly in F7, but this is not a blocker ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:03:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191303.m3JD3aLw003005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-19 09:03 EST ------- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pAgenda Short Description: A cross platform calendar and scheduler Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191308.m3JD8uF9004067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-19 09:08 EST ------- * Sat Apr 19 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.9.99900-4 - Added workaround for bug in eet.pc. Proper fix is commited upstream I contacted developer, bug is now fixed upstream: http://enlightenment.org/ viewvc/e17/libs/eet/eet.pc.in?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/eet.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/eet-goes-rawhide/eet-0.9.99900-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191338.m3JDcgGZ029246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 09:38 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, license included * follow guidelines * libraries packaged correctly * match upstream c9f75595152f571139df450314bdb5fc ../SOURCES/eet-0.9.99900.tar.bz2 * %files section right APPROVED I can sponsor you. I theory you should prove more, but since you have a whole stack of interdependent packages, I think it is better to sponsor you now, such that reviewers can install simply dependent packages. Any objection, Rex, Terje? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191339.m3JDdhds029427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224402 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-19 09:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: foobar New Branches: F-9 EL-5 Owner of EL-5 branch: lkundrak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:48:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191348.m3JDmF40030932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 gemi at bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191347.m3JDl68e010749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-19 09:47 EST ------- Thank you for your comments and suggestions =) Rex planned to stay away from internet for this weekend, according to his Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 13:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438039] Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191359.m3JDxJCu032588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438039 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 09:59 EST ------- Looks good. Both solutions seems right to me. I think that a provides with lower case could be nice. Also I would have preferred lower case package name, and provides with upper case, but it is up to you. I had the following comment in my package, since I found it a bit difficult to understand where the data comes from: # seems to be derived at least from 2 Public Domain datasets, # CIA World DataBank II and World Vector Shoreline (already in fedora), # then modified. * rpmlint ignorable GMT-coastlines-all.noarch: W: no-documentation GMT-coastlines-full.noarch: W: no-documentation GMT-coastlines-high.noarch: W: no-documentation * free content, license included * follow guidelines * no %dist, but it is clearly the right choice for this arch independent big data * %files section right * match upstream Needswork: The source urls are wrong, there is no /4/ in the real urls. Also the source files timestamps are not kept: $ ls -l GSHHS1.9_* ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_* -rw-r--r-- 1 dumas dumas 4249079 Oct 11 2007 ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_coast.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 dumas dumas 29338515 Oct 11 2007 ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_full.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 dumas dumas 8970004 Oct 11 2007 ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_high.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 4249079 Apr 2 10:39 GSHHS1.9_coast.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 29338515 Apr 2 10:39 GSHHS1.9_full.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 8970004 Apr 2 10:39 GSHHS1.9_high.tar.bz2 Though it matches upstream: 3eda660b999ee888ff59f6c7eba209a6 GSHHS1.9_coast.tar.bz2 2d3064c3fa2f7a4c3a2603dbb9885fff GSHHS1.9_full.tar.bz2 de50a3eab394393a7246f293ac0c840a GSHHS1.9_high.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 14:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191404.m3JE4pxZ001260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-04-19 10:04 EST ------- :) I had good intentions. Patrice, no objections, thanks for jumping in here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 14:10:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191410.m3JEADgU014836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 martin.sourada at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at gmail.com 2008-04-19 10:10 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gxine New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 14:13:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191413.m3JEDc0a002888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 10:13 EST ------- Issues: CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", and --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir} are automatically set in %configure. The CDEBUGFLAGS setting doesn't seems to be useful. I suggest to break %changelog lines at about 80 columns and use - signs to create lists: - Version upgrade. - Change license to MIT Old Style. - Fix URL, Requires, BuildRequires. - Change group to Applications/System like xclip. Include keywords in the description to make it easier to find. Remarks: The application compile flags are still present, but they don't look harmful to me. rpmlint says (wrongly) xsel.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog xsel-debuginfo.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog It works well. Match upstream 75983f143ce83dc259796c6eaf85c8f5 xsel-1.2.0.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 14:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191411.m3JEBH8f015077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at leemhuis.info Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 14:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191437.m3JEbQTb019108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-19 10:37 EST ------- > Any objection, Rex, Terje? Package seems to be in good shape now. Could maybe ping upstream about the rpath issue, which are a problem in more efl packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 15:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191527.m3JFRPHq027086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-19 11:27 EST ------- Many E-packages also bundle Vera font (which i'm going to strip out when building). People are strange, especially enlighted =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 15:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191554.m3JFs1oT019179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-19 11:54 EST ------- pedantic: o please don't use X-Windows in summary, use X, X Window System or nothing: Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API should be OK? o nice if spec file fit into 80 columns, split up BuildRequires line o no better URL for evas is available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 16:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] New: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bogado at bogado.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec SRPM URL: http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.2.1-1.bog9.src.rpm Description: Cave9 is a gravity cave-exploration game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 16:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191644.m3JGiPAj027328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-19 12:44 EST ------- That may be a problem with the font file, the font used by the game is free for personal and non-commercial uses. Since this is incompatible with fedora guidelines, the font is not bundled in the package. The problem is that since the font file is in the pristine source of the game it gets into the src.rpm file. Not sure if this is a problem or not. Also to change the font I used an already installed font, linked to the position that the game search for the font file and putted the font file as a dependency. Not sure if this is the best way (maybe a patch in the game should be better?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 16:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191647.m3JGlf5g008289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 bogado at bogado.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 16:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191652.m3JGqFaU028814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-19 12:52 EST ------- My packages are revisioned using git at gitorious: http://git.gitorious.org/specs-for-fedora/mainline.git -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 16:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191652.m3JGqULW028848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-19 12:52 EST ------- My packages are revisioned using git at gitorious: http://git.gitorious.org/specs-for-fedora/mainline.git -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 16:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191656.m3JGu7Q4009930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-19 12:56 EST ------- Doh, it doesn't. The Makefile.am was handling *.py and *.so separately, and I assumed they knew what they were doing... New package at http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra-1.1.0-3.src.rpm , tested to work with audit-viewer on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 17:54:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191754.m3JHsLeZ019237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-19 13:54 EST ------- Okay, rest of the review. I am horribly sorry for the delay: 1.) Desktop file $ desktop-file-validate /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop: warning: boolean key "Terminal" in group "Desktop Entry" has value "0", which is deprecated: boolean values should be "false" or "true" /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop: error: value "application/x-scidavis" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character $ * Desktop file: the Categories tag should not contain X-Fedora any more (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) 2.) Duplicate files warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/application-x-scidavis.svg 3.) SPEC file formatting scidavis.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 92, tab: line 1) 4.) Just rm or %exclude .pyc and .pyo (unless they are needed) rpmlint of scidavis: scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyc scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyo scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.py 5.) Dependencies * As scidavis ships icons in the hicolor directory, it should have "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" Most of these are fairly trivial; 5. and 4. are probably most important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 18:12:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191812.m3JICppl009526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-19 14:12 EST ------- Well, for 0.6.00-2: * BuildRequies: - python-devel requires python so "BuildRequires: python" is redundant. * Requires - Please check Requires for cwiid-devel package. %_includedir/cwiid.h contains: ---------------------------------------------------------- 62 #include 63 #include /* bdaddr_t */ 64 ---------------------------------------------------------- This means cwiid-devel must have "Requies: bluez-libs-devel" * License: - The license tag is a bit complex. * wminput/action_enum.txt is GPLv2 (not GPLv2+) * And this file is used as: ---------------------------------------------------------- 198 gawk -f action_enum.awk action_enum.txt > action_enum.c 210 gcc -g -Wall -W -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/builddir/build/BUILD/cwiid-0.6.00/common/include -I../libcwiid -DWMINPUT_CONFIG_DIR=\"/etc/cwiid/wminput\" -DCWIID_PLUGINS_DIR=\"/usr/lib/cwiid/plugins\" -I/usr/include/python2.5 -c -o action_enum.o action_enum.c 227 gcc -o wminput main.o conf.o c_plugin.o uinput.o action_enum.o util.o py_plugin.o parser.o lexer.o -L../libcwiid -rdynamic -lcwiid -ldl -lpython2.5 ---------------------------------------------------------- So %_bindir/wminput is GPLv2. As a result, please change the license tag of -wminput to "GPLv2". * Compilation flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. ---------------------------------------------------------- 164 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/cwiid-0.6.00/libcwiid' 165 gcc -g -Wall -W -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/builddir/build/BUILD/cwiid-0.6.00/common/include -fpic -c -o bluetooth.o bluetooth.c ---------------------------------------------------------- You can check what flags Fedora uses on compilation by "$ rpm --eval %optflags" * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that the directory created when installing a rpm is owned by the rpm. For example, the directory %_libdir/cwiid is not owned by any package. * static archive - Remove static archive unless needed. "Exclusion of Static Libraries" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * GUI app - as %{_bindir}/wmgui is GUI program, an appropriate desktop file must be installed. Check the section "Desktop files" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Documents - Please add "AUTHORS" to %doc - Also adding "NEWS" is preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 18:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191814.m3JIEmgH009674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-19 14:14 EST ------- When you upgrade your spec/srpm, please write the URLs of your spec/srpm so that we can download them from the URLs directly by "wget -N", for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 18:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191829.m3JITSYe024859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-19 14:29 EST ------- Well, from a very quick glance: * Please consider to use %?dist tag: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * License tag "LGPL" is invalid for current Fedora license policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing * "Requires: liblo libsndfile" is redundant and should be removed. These types of library dependency are automatically detected and added to rebuilt binary rpms. * Don't specify %python_site_dir in the way you write now and please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python * Remove long Authors entry from %description. If you want this, write them in a file and include it as %doc. * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored (you can check what flags are used by "$rpm --eval %optflags") * Please make it sure that all directories created when installing a rpm are owned by the rpm. For example, %{_libdir}/csound/ is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 18:45:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191845.m3JIjUDs027554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-19 14:45 EST ------- Improved evas spec. New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/evas.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/evas-goes-rawhide/evas-0.9.9.042-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Apr 19 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.9.9.042-2 - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestampts of installed files - Beautified summary - Added html docs - Added missing dependencies for evas-devel 2Terjeros: E website is complete mess, only eet has dedicated page, and linking casual users (who just want to know wtf are they installing as dependency for something like elitaire, the card game) to page with coding docs is not good idea IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 19:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] New: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/rubygem-activeldap.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/rubygem-activeldap-0.10.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: LDAP APIs for Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 19:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443249] New: Review Request: rubygem-hoe - Hoe is a simple rake/rubygems helper for project Rakefiles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443249 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-hoe - Hoe is a simple rake/rubygems helper for project Rakefiles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/rubygem-hoe.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/rubygem-hoe-1.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Hoe is a simple rake/rubygems helper for project Rakefiles -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 19:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443250] New: Review Request: rubygem-rubyforge - A script which automates a limited set of rubyforge operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443250 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubyforge - A script which automates a limited set of rubyforge operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/rubygem-rubyforge.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.dyndns.org/~mcpierce/rubygem-rubyforge-0.4.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A script which automates a limited set of rubyforge operations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 19:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804191940.m3JJeZDV004534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-04-19 15:40 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I'm not sure where the extra flags and options came from. I think I was trying to cross-build the rpm to x86_64 or vice-versa. Anyway, they're gone. rpmlint-0.82-2.fc8 reports nothing. http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xsel.spec http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/xsel-1.2.0-2.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Apr 19 2008 Henry Kroll - 1.2.0-2 - Standardize build section, remove unnecessary CDEBUGFLAGS. - Break up long lines, general cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 20:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192000.m3JK0PPY027710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-19 16:00 EST ------- Done all those points the new srpm and specs are at : http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid-0.6.00-3.bog9.src.rpm http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 20:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192021.m3JKLStS011875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-04-19 16:21 EST ------- I have made a new fixed version: Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet-0.1.7.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Changes I have made: - New upstream version - Updated license (as per http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00173.html) - Added missing BuildRequires - Correctly use python_sitelib instead of python_sitearch I now correctly build on all architectures. I tested this using a koji scratch build on dist-f9 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=573875). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 20:43:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192043.m3JKhjsB003504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 16:43 EST ------- * follow guidelines * free software, license included * match upstream 75983f143ce83dc259796c6eaf85c8f5 RPM-fc/SOURCES/xsel-1.2.0.tar.gz * %files section right 1 suggestion: use %{_mandir}/man1/xsel.1x* to catch all compressions and no compressions. APPROVED Now you can point a potential sponsor to that submission or you can point me to your works such that I sponsor you (I have seen xmms-pulse). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 20:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192044.m3JKitDL003624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-19 16:44 EST ------- And Manuel, you can also comment if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 20:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192057.m3JKvUsM005870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-19 16:57 EST ------- I submitted for revision. Now this package is honouring fedora compiler flags and has a desktop file. The new spec and srpm files are : http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9.spec http://bogado.net/rpm/cave9-0.2.1-2.bog9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 20:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192057.m3JKvQhF005847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-19 16:57 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback ! It seems this is an incompatibility with yacc (it works fine with bison). I have fixed this problem, and will submit a new source package soon. I'v been trying to package this on a x86_64 box myself, and run into another issue. May be you know how to address this: In my spec file I list files, using the %{_libdir} variable, as per your earlier suggestion. This expands to /usr/lib64. However, the buildsystem itself uses autoconf, which provides a 'libdir' variable, but which expands to /usr/lib. Thus, my library files end up in /usr/lib, and then rpmbuild tries to find them in /usr/lib64, and obviously fails. What can I do about that ? autoconf and rpmbuild seem to disagree about the file system layout. Is there a way around this ? Is this a known issue ? Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 21:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192112.m3JLCQNM008615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-19 17:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) Hope correct all of above. Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-2.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 21:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192117.m3JLHblc009405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-19 17:17 EST ------- Improved spec. New spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/embryo.spec New SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/embryo-goes-rawhide/ embryo-0.9.1.042-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Apr 19 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk - 0.9.1.042-2 - Fixed timestamp of source tarball - Preserve timestamps of installed files - Added html docs - Added missing dependencies for embryo-devel - Added workaround for bug in embryo.pc. Proper fix is commited upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 21:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192132.m3JLWBeo011714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 henning.noren at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |henning.noren at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From henning.noren at gmail.com 2008-04-19 17:32 EST ------- Tested and confirmed working on Fedora 9 i686 Preview Live (USB). I booted, installed the rpm and reloaded the b43 module. Checked with WPA2 PSK on HP/Compaq nc6320 with Broadcom WLAN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 19 21:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804192145.m3JLjnNv014034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-04-19 17:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, olpc2 seems to have only i386, however rebuild fails on > dist-f9 x86_64 and I think this is worth fixing. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=569171 I am not sure this olpc version of Csound can be built on x86_64. I don't think anything can be done about that. Is it a problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 01:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200113.m3K1DB4E014452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 21:13 EST ------- Thanks Patrice, but I am focusing on other reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 01:11:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200111.m3K1BXl5014348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-19 21:11 EST ------- Seems OK now. There is a single warning from rpmlint: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/hamster-applet.schemas It is up to you to decide if it is worth marking that file as %config(noreplace) (but I would do it) S For cosmetical reasons, please split the BR line in 2, so as to not exceed 80 columns (you now have 151) I'll test the program a bit later and follow with a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 02:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200203.m3K23TXv001945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 geoff at programmer-monk.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(geoff at programmer- | |monk.net) | ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-04-19 22:03 EST ------- For the 2.7.0 the scala distribution has been changed such that the documentation and tool support files are distributed separately, but still released together. Does it make more sense to split them into separate packages or to still have that all built from the main scala package? If I were to split them into multiple packages, would I open new bugs for those packages with a dependency on this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 03:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200346.m3K3kIqO017911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-19 23:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > For the 2.7.0 the scala distribution has been changed such that the > documentation and tool support files are distributed separately, but still > released together. > Does it make more sense to split them into separate packages > or to still have that all built from the main scala package? Spliting them into seperate srpms is preferred. > If I were to split > them into multiple packages, would I open new bugs for those packages with a > dependency on this one? Yes, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 05:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200555.m3K5tQVS005432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-20 01:55 EST ------- Fedora rawhide csound srpm has a patch named csound-5.03.0-64-bit-plugin-path.patch so please investigate the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 05:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200552.m3K5qPQw004904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-20 01:52 EST ------- I must say I cannot investigate what is happening to your source unless your source is given to me. So would you upload your srpm anyway (with fixes as much as possible)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 05:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200550.m3K5owtT004706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-20 01:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > 3.) %configure --disable-numpy > > > > Is there a reason to disable numpy? We have numpy in Fedora afaik. > The package does not build with current numpy. Given that the last release of > python-gtkextra happened four years ago, I'd prefer avoiding extensive patching > (otherwise Fedora could become something like a new upstream for the package, > and I currently don't care about it that much). > > If an user requests numpy support - or if you insist on it - I'll take a look > and make it build (if not work), but I'd rather not. Other features of > python-gtkextra that don't build were dealt with in the same manner - by > removing them. Given there is a good reason to disable numpy support, I think it is not required. If someone requires numpy support, he can still open a bug report. 4.) python-gtkextra-1.1.0-update.patch What's this patch? Seems like a lot of unrelated changes -- is it a diff between release and a CVS snapshot? Please add a comment to it. 5.) rpmlint of python-gtkextra: python-gtkextra.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/python-gtkextra.pc Apart from these two, fairly minor, issues, I see no more problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 05:59:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200559.m3K5xB7e005775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-20 01:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Fedora rawhide csound srpm has a patch named > csound-5.03.0-64-bit-plugin-path.patch so please investigate the > patch. Ummm.. It seems that on 64 bit csound does some tricky method to install plugins corretly. As olpc2 seems to be supporting i386 only, I guess we can ignore it for now. So please fix the rest issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 07:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200720.m3K7KBJg018682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-20 03:20 EST ------- I update srpm and spec file without changing the release number. (In reply to comment #14) > Okay, rest of the review. I am horribly sorry for the delay: > > 1.) Desktop file > > $ desktop-file-validate /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop > /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in > group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated > /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop: warning: boolean key > "Terminal" in group "Desktop Entry" has value "0", which is deprecated: boolean > values should be "false" or "true" > /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/scidavis.desktop: error: value > "application/x-scidavis" for string list key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" > does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character > $ > > * Desktop file: the Categories tag should not contain X-Fedora any more > (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) > Ok > 2.) Duplicate files > > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1 > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0 > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1 > warning: > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0 > warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > warning: > File listed twice: > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/application-x-scidavis.svg I can't reproduce this > > 3.) SPEC file formatting > > scidavis.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 92, tab: line 1) > Ok > 4.) Just rm or %exclude .pyc and .pyo (unless they are needed) > > rpmlint of scidavis: > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyc > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyo > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.py These files are needed see comment 1 about this. > > 5.) Dependencies > > * As scidavis ships icons in the hicolor directory, it should have "Requires: > hicolor-icon-theme" > Ok > Most of these are fairly trivial; 5. and 4. are probably most important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 07:50:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200750.m3K7oCAT023440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-04-20 03:50 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: linkage New Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 07:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200751.m3K7p6C2011244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 ------- Additional Comments From thomas at apestaart.org 2008-04-20 03:51 EST ------- I suggest require'ing libvisual-plugins - the default config uses libvisual_jess as visualisation and Elisa doesn't say anything about the vis plugin being missing atm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 08:02:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200802.m3K823Tu026174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-04-20 04:02 EST ------- I have split up the BuildRequires into more lines. In regards to the schema file I have been reading the packaging guidelines again and (to me at least) it seems that the schema file isn't meant as a user-editable configuration file. So I see two options: Either leave it like it is (without the noreplace flag) or not mark it as a config file at all (which gives the non-conffile-in-etc rpmllint warning). I looked at deskbar-applet and gedit for instance, and they don't mark their schema files with %config. So unless you have any objections I have decided to not mark the schema file as a config file. New versions available here: Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet-0.1.7.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 08:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440597] Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200821.m3K8LoDj017290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: olpcsound - OLPC subset of csound 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597 ------- Additional Comments From victor.lazzarini at nuim.ie 2008-04-20 04:21 EST ------- I will do. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 09:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 05:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804200902.m3K92YXC020489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-20 05:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > 2.) Duplicate files > > > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1 > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0 > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1 > > warning: > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0 > > warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > > warning: > > File listed twice: > > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/application-x-scidavis.svg > > I can't reproduce this I am wondering if this is x86_64 specific? Could you please attach your build log? > > 4.) Just rm or %exclude .pyc and .pyo (unless they are needed) > > > > rpmlint of scidavis: > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyc > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyo > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.py > > These files are needed see comment 1 about this. Even the .pyo and .pyc? I highly doubt that -- have you tried excluding them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 10:33:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 06:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201033.m3KAXuO6002583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-04-20 06:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-gtkextra Short Description: Python bindings for gtkextra Owners: mitr Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 11:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201107.m3KB7XOo020861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-20 07:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303050) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303050&action=view) Build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 11:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201109.m3KB9EM8008492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-20 07:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > > 2.) Duplicate files > > > > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1 > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0 > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational0.so.1.0.0 > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1 > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0 > > > warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/scidavis/plugins/libfitRational1.so.1.0.0 > > > warning: > > > File listed twice: > > > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/application-x-scidavis.svg > > > > I can't reproduce this > > I am wondering if this is x86_64 specific? Could you please attach your build log? see attached file > > > > 4.) Just rm or %exclude .pyc and .pyo (unless they are needed) > > > > > > rpmlint of scidavis: > > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyc > > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyo > > > scidavis.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.py > > > > These files are needed see comment 1 about this. > > Even the .pyo and .pyc? I highly doubt that -- have you tried excluding them? You are right. Now i drop their. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 11:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 07:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201156.m3KBujA9016527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2008-04-20 07:56 EST ------- Looks good, just some IMHO odd things I'd like to mention/discuss before we move on: * Quoting from the initial comment in this bug: >I choosed the libbind version from RHEL 5 to have a long update support >and maybe some help from Adam Tkac, if needed. As per his suggestion, it >is better to put this in EPEL 4, as RHEL 4 only should get bug fixes and >no enhancements. Well, if this is for EPEL4 why didn't you use the bind from RHEL4 as base, as it has "long update support" as well? I tend to say it will looks quite odd for users to find bind-9.2.4 in RHEL4 but a libbind that's based on the RHEL5-version bind-9.3.5 in EPEL4. Are they really independent/will libbind from bind-9.3 work fine with bind-9.2? * Minor: Might be wise to add a version number or something to this (but okay, maybe none is used in the bind package from RHEL5, so feel free to ignore it) : Source1: libbind-man.tar.gz * Specifying glibc-devel should not be needed, as gcc likely depends on it: BuildRequires: glibc-devel >= 2.2.5-26, glibc-kernheaders >= 2.4-7.10 * The "description" is IMHO confusing/hard to read and doesn't really express what the package contains. * This "(-,root,root)" IIRC should be "(-,root,root,-)" * rpmlint silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 13:04:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443301] New: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443301 Summary: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dev at nigelj.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance-0.20-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Concordance enables users of the Logitech Harmony series of universal remote controls to update their firmware and configuration information from within linux. rpmlint issues: libconcord-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libconcord-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation libconcord-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation There is no suitable documentation... libconcord-perl.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/concord/concord.bs I'm not 100% sure about this one, if someone can confirm it's not needed, then I'll %exclude in next revision libconcord-perl.x86_64: W: perl-temp-file /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod Ditto libconcord-perl.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/concord/concord.so 0555 Seems to match other similar files. Nothing seems critical to me... Just as a note though... I've had a hell of a job getting the configure scripts to understand LDFLAGS/CFLAGS in places, hence the patches and sed's so per guidelines ( Adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so; the rationale for doing so should be reviewed and documented in the specfile especially in the override and filter cases.) I've done the patching... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 13:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443301] Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201306.m3KD6ASE009187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443301 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-20 09:06 EST ------- Opps... Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance-0.20-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 13:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443303] New: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443303 Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-nodoka Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/notification-daemon-engine-nodoka.spec SRPM URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/notification-daemon-engine-nodoka-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Nodoka theme engine/theme for the notification daemon Additional info: I am also upstream for this package. To enable the engine (e.g. for testing purposes) one needs to set gconf key "/apps/notification-daemon/theme" to "nodoka". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 13:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201321.m3KDLhYQ032092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-04-20 09:21 EST ------- > Well, if this is for EPEL4 why didn't you use the bind from RHEL4 as base, as > it has "long update support" as well? I tend to say it will looks quite odd > for users to find bind-9.2.4 in RHEL4 but a libbind that's based on the > RHEL5-version bind-9.3.5 in EPEL4. Are they really independent/will libbind > from bind-9.3 work fine with bind-9.2? AFAIK libbind found it's way into Fedora/RHEL the first time with a bind 9.3.x series, I can imagine this had a good reason. On the other hand, the bind 9.2.x ships libbind.so.3 which seems to be a bigger step to libbind.so.4 coming from 9.3.x; the current bind 9.5.x also ships libbind.so.4. This keeps me as EPEL maintainer on the safer side, that if something in libbind breaks, somebody has at least a look for RHEL 5 at it and I can just grab/steal afterwards the patch for EPEL 4 ;-) Personally, I didn't see a problem with having this libbind packageon a CentOS 4.6 together with Bitlbee 1.2, yet. Ah and a closed source third party software also works with it - oh and that one somehow depends on libbind.so.4 and not on libbind.so.3... But regarding the real deep technical points, maybe Adam is able to tell a few words here? > Source1: libbind-man.tar.gz I'll change that. I just copied it over from a current bind package as it is. > BuildRequires: glibc-devel >= 2.2.5-26, glibc-kernheaders >= 2.4-7.10 I think, you're right. Also a copied thing. I'll check this soon for the next package in mock. > * The "description" is IMHO confusing/hard to read and doesn't really express > what the package contains. Mmmh...yes. Should get rewriten, when now re-reading it again. > * This "(-,root,root)" IIRC should be "(-,root,root,-)" Luckily that's optional and not a must ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 14:44:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] New: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfwm4-theme-nodoka.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfwm4-theme-nodoka-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Nodoka theme for xfwm4. A clean theme featuring soft gradients and Echoey look and feel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 14:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201446.m3KEkp7b013354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com, | |kevin at tummy.com Priority|medium |urgent ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-20 10:46 EST ------- If someone could review this package quickly we might be able to make it into final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:03:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201503.m3KF3Zls016049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-20 11:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > > > File listed twice: > > > > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/application-x-scidavis.svg > > > > > > I can't reproduce this > > > > I am wondering if this is x86_64 specific? Could you please attach your build log? > > see attached file Well i386, so it is arch specific. Leave this open, we'll resolve it later. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201523.m3KFN1h3019394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 martin.sourada at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.sourada at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201521.m3KFLoRI019278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 martin.sourada at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at gmail.com 2008-04-20 11:21 EST ------- Must items: rpmlint clean name OK specfile OK follow the guidelines OK has approved license OK md5 correct for the temporary source on your page package builds OK no locales OK no shared libs OK owns its dirs OK Problems: URL was not correct so I've uploaded the sources in your stead to speed up the review. (https://fedorahosted.org/releases/n/o/nodoka/xfwm4-theme-nodoka-0.1.tar.gz) missing rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %%install section Once you fix the last issue, I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201526.m3KFQp2t020189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at gmail.com 2008-04-20 11:26 EST ------- Oh and I missed the srpm rpmlint output: xfwm4-theme-nodoka.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install xfwm4-theme-nodoka.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 30) Please fix the warning as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201525.m3KFPw2Y031608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2008-04-20 11:25 EST ------- For reference, I raised comment 10 with FPC: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-April/msg00076.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201536.m3KFaKbJ021801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2008-04-20 11:36 EST ------- And fixed the license and copying file in the spec url. Those are very very minor issues and i'd prefer to start with a revision of 1 instead having to bump for that here. If you absolutely require a bump for some reason, i can create an srpm with a .fc10 disttag instead of .fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:36:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201536.m3KFatIE000887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-20 11:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scidavis Short Description: Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization Owners: tanguy Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201541.m3KFfcxn022612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-20 11:41 EST ------- Does it mean that you want me to wait for FPC voting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201545.m3KFjBNT002230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-20 11:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > URL was not correct so I've uploaded the sources in your stead to speed up the > review. thanks (In reply to comment #3) > Oh and I missed the srpm rpmlint output: > xfwm4-theme-nodoka.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > xfwm4-theme-nodoka.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: > line 30) My bad, I did not rpmlint the package. Both fixed in http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfwm4-theme-nodoka.spec You want me to do another SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 15:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201550.m3KFoVQg024126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 martin.sourada at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From martin.sourada at gmail.com 2008-04-20 11:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > URL was not correct so I've uploaded the sources in your stead to speed up the > > review. > thanks > > (In reply to comment #3) > > Oh and I missed the srpm rpmlint output: > > xfwm4-theme-nodoka.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > > xfwm4-theme-nodoka.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: > > line 30) > > My bad, I did not rpmlint the package. Both fixed in > http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfwm4-theme-nodoka.spec > You want me to do another SRPM? Nice, that's acceptable. Would be better though, to bump the release number and mention the fixes in the %%changelog (and post new srpm here), but I do not require it. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 16:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201604.m3KG4UuA005488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-20 12:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Would be better though, to bump the release number and > mention the fixes in the %%changelog (and post new srpm here), but I do not > require it. > I usually do this but I found these changes to trivial and did not want to do another mockbuild. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfwm4-theme-nodoka Short Description: Nodoka theme for xfwm4 Owners: cwickert Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mso Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 16:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441830] Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201601.m3KG1UvD005089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-ODBC - ODBC Driver for DBI Alias: perl-DBD-ODBC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441830 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-20 12:01 EST ------- Hm. If you set up dummy odbcinst.ini and odbc.ini's along the lines the sqlite homepage suggests, you can cause the tests to use it by running them along the lines of: ODBCSYSINI=. ODBCINI=odbc.ini DBI_DSN=dbi:ODBC:mysqlitedb make test where odbcinst.ini is: [SQLite] Description=SQLite ODBC Driver Driver=/usr/lib64/libsqlite3odbc-0.77.so Setup=/usr/lib64/libsqlite3odbc-0.77.so Threading=2 And odbc.ini is: [mysqlitedb] Description=My SQLite test database Driver=SQLite Database=/tmp/mytest-foo.db # optional lock timeout in milliseconds Timeout=2000 Unfortunately, most of the tests fail: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/02simple.t 255 65280 62 98 158.06% 14-62 t/03dbatt.t 7 1792 24 7 29.17% 5 7 15-18 23 t/05meth.t 255 65280 13 17 130.77% 3 6-13 t/07bind.t 255 65280 11 20 181.82% 2-11 t/08bind2.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 3-5 t/10handler.t 1 256 10 1 10.00% 10 156 subtests skipped. Failed 6/12 test scripts, 50.00% okay. 79/295 subtests failed, 73.22% okay. Fixing the first failed test in 02simple.t cuts the number of failed tests significantly: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/02simple.t 7 1792 62 7 11.29% 34 36-39 43 53 t/03dbatt.t 1 256 24 1 4.17% 16 t/10handler.t 1 256 10 1 10.00% 10 156 subtests skipped. Failed 3/12 test scripts, 75.00% okay. 9/295 subtests failed, 96.95% okay. Looking at the test suite, it looks like the test suite can't handle sqlite for some reason. It might be a good idea to file a bug upstream asking about the test suite and using an sqlite backend... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 16:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201603.m3KG3jrU005407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-20 12:03 EST ------- Now koji/CVS/etc seems under construction so I cannot check binary rpms rebuilt from your srpm, however for 0.6.00-3: * SourceURL: - I recommend to use %{name} and %{version}. With this you won't have to change Source0 URL when version is upgraded. * BuildRequires - Rebuild fails because "BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" is missing. * License tag for -wminput subpackage - License tag "GPLv2" is okay, however would you write some comments in the spec file to explain why this subpackage has the license tag? * Compiler flags - Fedora specific compiler flags are not yet correctly honored. * Directory ownership issue/Duplicate files - There are many warnings like: ------------------------------------------------------------- warning: File listed twice: /etc/cwiid/wminput warning: File listed twice: /etc/cwiid/wminput/acc_ptr warning: File listed twice: /etc/cwiid/wminput/acc_ptr warning: File listed twice: /etc/cwiid/wminput/buttons warning: File listed twice: /etc/cwiid/wminput/buttons ..................... -------------------------------------------------------------- ! If you write the %files entry -------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_libdir}/cwiid -------------------------------------------------------------- this contains the directory %_libdir/cwiid and all files/ directories/etc under the directory, while -------------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{_libdir}/cwiid -------------------------------------------------------------- contains the directory %_libdir/cwiid only. * Desktop file - wmgui desktop file has Icon entry, however no icons seem to be installed? Well, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 16:26:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201626.m3KGQ3EA030028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-20 12:26 EST ------- For 2.8-1: * spec file name - Again the name of the spec file must be "ganyremote.spec". - Also change the permission of tarball in srpm to 0644. * %doc - Files under %_defaultdocdir are automatically regarded as %doc. Please fix above. After that I guess I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 17:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201705.m3KH5RHt003993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2008-04-20 13:05 EST ------- Managed to reproduce it. both ls and konq hang while trying to access -different- mounts. GDB is active - but Ctrl-C inactive, and sending SIGTERM/SIGSEGV from a remote terminal doesn't seem help. :( I can only assume that automount is sleeping somewhere in the kernel. Should I enable magic SysReq and get a kernel callstack dump over serial? $ gdb /usr/sbin/automount GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.6-45.fc8rh) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) r -d -f Starting program: /usr/sbin/automount -d -f [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Starting automounter version 5.0.2-27, master map auto.master using kernel protocol version 5.00 [New Thread 46912510630656 (LWP 11390)] [New Thread 1073809744 (LWP 11393)] [New Thread 1073879376 (LWP 11394)] lookup_nss_read_master: reading master files auto.master parse_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null) [Detaching after fork from child process 11395. (Try `set detach-on-fork off'.)] [Detaching after fork from child process 11396.] lookup_read_master: lookup(file): read entry /misc lookup_read_master: lookup(file): read entry /net lookup_read_master: lookup(file): read entry /autofs lookup_read_master: lookup(file): read entry +auto.master lookup_nss_read_master: reading master files auto.master parse_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null) lookup_nss_read_master: reading master nisplus auto.master parse_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null) lookup_read_master: lookup(nisplus): couldn't locate nis+ table auto.master lookup(file): failed to read included master map auto.master master_do_mount: mounting /misc [New Thread 1074932048 (LWP 11397)] automount_path_to_fifo: fifo name /var/run/autofs.fifo-misc lookup_nss_read_map: reading map file /etc/auto.misc parse_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null) [Detaching after fork from child process 11398.] [Detaching after fork from child process 11399.] mounted indirect mount on /misc with timeout 300, freq 75 seconds master_do_mount: mounting /net [New Thread 1075984720 (LWP 11400)] automount_path_to_fifo: fifo name /var/run/autofs.fifo-net lookup_nss_read_map: reading map hosts (null) parse_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null) mounted indirect mount on /net with timeout 300, freq 75 seconds master_do_mount: mounting /autofs [New Thread 1077037392 (LWP 11401)] automount_path_to_fifo: fifo name /var/run/autofs.fifo-autofs lookup_nss_read_map: reading map file /etc/auto.autofs parse_init: parse(sun): init gathered global options: (null) [Detaching after fork from child process 11402.] >> umount: /autofs/Multimedia: not mounted [Detaching after fork from child process 11405.] >> umount: /autofs/Install: not mounted [Detaching after fork from child process 11408.] >> umount: /autofs/Backup: not mounted mounted indirect mount on /autofs with timeout 60, freq 15 seconds handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 5, name Multimedia, request pid 11458 [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11459)] attempting to mount entry /autofs/Multimedia lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up Multimedia lookup_mount: lookup(file): Multimedia -> -fstype=nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia parse_mount: parse(sun): expanded entry: -fstype=nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia parse_mount: parse(sun): gathered options: fstype=nfs parse_mount: parse(sun): dequote("gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia") -> gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia parse_mount: parse(sun): core of entry: options=fstype=nfs, loc=gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia sun_mount: parse(sun): mounting root /autofs, mountpoint Multimedia, what gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia, fstype nfs, options mount_mount: mount(nfs): root=/autofs name=Multimedia what=gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia, fstype=nfs, options= mount_mount: mount(nfs): nfs options="", nosymlink=0, ro=0 mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mkdir_path /autofs/Multimedia mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mount -t nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia /autofs/Multimedia [Detaching after fork from child process 11460.] mount(nfs): mounted gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Multimedia on /autofs/Multimedia send_ready: token = 5 mounted /autofs/Multimedia handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 6, name Install, request pid 11458 [Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11459) exited] [New Thread 1079142736 (LWP 11462)] attempting to mount entry /autofs/Install lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up Install lookup_mount: lookup(file): Install -> -fstype=nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install parse_mount: parse(sun): expanded entry: -fstype=nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install parse_mount: parse(sun): gathered options: fstype=nfs parse_mount: parse(sun): dequote("gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install") -> gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install parse_mount: parse(sun): core of entry: options=fstype=nfs, loc=gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install sun_mount: parse(sun): mounting root /autofs, mountpoint Install, what gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install, fstype nfs, options mount_mount: mount(nfs): root=/autofs name=Install what=gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install, fstype=nfs, options= mount_mount: mount(nfs): nfs options="", nosymlink=0, ro=0 mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mkdir_path /autofs/Install mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mount -t nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install /autofs/Install [Detaching after fork from child process 11463.] mount(nfs): mounted gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Install on /autofs/Install send_ready: token = 6 mounted /autofs/Install [Thread 1079142736 (LWP 11462) exited] handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 7, name Backup, request pid 11468 [New Thread 1079142736 (LWP 11469)] attempting to mount entry /autofs/Backup lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up Backup lookup_mount: lookup(file): Backup -> -fstype=nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup parse_mount: parse(sun): expanded entry: -fstype=nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup parse_mount: parse(sun): gathered options: fstype=nfs parse_mount: parse(sun): dequote("gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup") -> gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup parse_mount: parse(sun): core of entry: options=fstype=nfs, loc=gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup sun_mount: parse(sun): mounting root /autofs, mountpoint Backup, what gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup, fstype nfs, options mount_mount: mount(nfs): root=/autofs name=Backup what=gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup, fstype=nfs, options= mount_mount: mount(nfs): nfs options="", nosymlink=0, ro=0 mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mkdir_path /autofs/Backup mount_mount: mount(nfs): calling mount -t nfs gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup /autofs/Backup [Detaching after fork from child process 11470.] mount(nfs): mounted gilboa-home-srv:/mnt/Backup on /autofs/Backup send_ready: token = 7 mounted /autofs/Backup [Thread 1079142736 (LWP 11469) exited] handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 8, name .directory, request pid 11477 [New Thread 1079142736 (LWP 11480)] attempting to mount entry /net/.directory lookup_mount: lookup(hosts): fetchng export list for .directory create_udp_client:99: hostname lookup failed: No such process create_tcp_client:308: hostname lookup failed: No such process lookup_mount: exports lookup failed for .directory send_fail: token = 8 failed to mount /net/.directory [Thread 1079142736 (LWP 11480) exited] handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 9, name .directory, request pid 11477 [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11481)] attempting to mount entry /autofs/.directory lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up .directory lookup_mount: lookup(file): key ".directory" not found in map send_fail: token = 9 failed to mount /autofs/.directory [Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11481) exited] handle_packet: type = 3 handle_packet_missing_indirect: token 10, name .directory, request pid 11477 [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11482)] attempting to mount entry /misc/.directory lookup_mount: lookup(file): looking up .directory lookup_mount: lookup(file): key ".directory" not found in map send_fail: token = 10 failed to mount /misc/.directory [Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11482) exited] st_expire: state 1 path /autofs [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11494)] expire_proc: exp_proc = 1078090064 path /autofs expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Multimedia expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Install expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Backup 3 remaining in /autofs expire_cleanup: got thid 1078090064 path /autofs stat 4 expire_cleanup: sigchld: exp 1078090064 finished, switching from 2 to 1 st_ready: st_ready(): state = 2 path /autofs [Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11494) exited] st_expire: state 1 path /autofs [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11502)] expire_proc: exp_proc = 1078090064 path /autofs expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Multimedia expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Install expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Backup 3 remaining in /autofs expire_cleanup: got thid 1078090064 path /autofs stat 4 expire_cleanup: sigchld: exp 1078090064 finished, switching from 2 to 1 st_ready: st_ready(): state = 2 path /autofs [Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11502) exited] st_expire: state 1 path /autofs [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11527)] expire_proc: exp_proc = 1078090064 path /autofs expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Multimedia expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Install expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Backup 3 remaining in /autofs expire_cleanup: got thid 1078090064 path /autofs stat 4 expire_cleanup: sigchld: exp 1078090064 finished, switching from 2 to 1 st_ready: st_ready(): state = 2 path /autofs [Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11527) exited] st_expire: state 1 path /autofs [New Thread 1078090064 (LWP 11580)] expire_proc: exp_proc = 1078090064 path /autofs expire_proc_indirect: expire /autofs/Multimedia handle_packet: type = 4 handle_packet_expire_indirect: token 11, name Backup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 17:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201706.m3KH6GqA016134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 ------- Additional Comments From gilboad at gmail.com 2008-04-20 13:06 EST ------- Sigh. Please ignore previous comment. Working on too many bugs at once :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 17:43:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435572] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201743.m3KHhkSK022090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Hearts game for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435572 ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2008-04-20 13:43 EST ------- If you feel you cannot trust me to do the right thing based on the outcome of FPC, then yes please wait. If you feel you can trust me to do the right thing, then please approve with such a statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 17:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201758.m3KHwYta012633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-20 13:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) Hope i corrected all the issues. Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-2.8-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 19:11:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201911.m3KJBfQf004158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-20 15:11 EST ------- Yes, it is my first package for fedora and yes, I am quite confused with the submission process. I have created some account today, so please check the system now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 19:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201931.m3KJVYcg028246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 19:30:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201930.m3KJUXNm028106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shadowarts at nonlogic.org ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-20 15:30 EST ------- *** Bug 252133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 19:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252133] Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201930.m3KJUWeS028080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GTK frontend for synergy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252133 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-20 15:30 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 442263 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 19:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804201942.m3KJgDLB009239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-20 15:42 EST ------- Thanks for the package. 1.) Desktop file needs some love: $ desktop-file-validate /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/quicksynergy.desktop /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/quicksynergy.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated /home/lkundrak/rpmbuild/SOURCES/quicksynergy.desktop: warning: value "Network;Application;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" $ Icon=qslogo.png This is invalid. You should omit the .png suffix. Name=QuickSynergy Hm, there is no entry key that would tell tell much about what's the application for. How about "Mouse and Keyboard Sharing" or something similar? Check out GenericName and Comment keys. The same applies for "Summary:" in the spec file. http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ 2.) /usr/share/pixmaps/qslogo.png should not be executable. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3897 2008-04-20 21:34 /usr/share/pixmaps/qslogo.png Use install -m 644 instead of install to copy it. In other respects the package looks fine. It is legible, sane. Builds fine in mock, uses required make and compile flags. rpmlint does not complain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 20 23:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804202355.m3KNtx8h008855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-20 19:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/html2ps-1.0- 0.1.b5.fc9.noarch.rpm That looks like the actual RPM not the SRPM :) (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, I don't think I should do a formal review yet Okay, turns out I'm not as rusty as I thought I was so I'll be happy to review! (In reply to comment #2) > Indeed, there is no utf8 support and quite a number of bugs opened in > debian. I will have a look at time permits, but I don't think it is > blocking. I agree 100% was just making sure you were aware of it. Initial look at spec file seems not bad. (On a side note, could you maybe consider reviewing Bug443301 in return?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 00:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210022.m3L0MxoE024475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-20 20:22 EST ------- Just checked the SRPM and as Giancarlo said, the only changes are the inclusion of the license grant. The only problem is, the tarball on the website has not been updated: File in SRPM: 22cc42da337853c91ca30d91905e9ccb ../Falcon-0.8.8.tar.gz File in server: 119819f68e725fb53ef80d9d61e19a5d Falcon-0.8.8.tar.gz Giancarlo, could you either post the grant somewhere on the site, or update the tarball? Otherwise I can use the old tarball, and add the grant file as a separate source, with a link to this page for reference. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 02:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438892] Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210201.m3L218vW031809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyPdf - PDF toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438892 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 02:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210204.m3L24FOl032333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-20 22:04 EST ------- As branching is in progress.... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pAgenda Short Description: A cross platform calendar and scheduler Owners: nigelj Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 03:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443355] New: Merge Review: gnumeric Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443355 Summary: Merge Review: gnumeric Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Fedora Merge Review: gnumeric http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/gnumeric/ Initial Owner: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 03:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443355] Merge Review: gnumeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210322.m3L3MfHh024343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnumeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443355 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dev at nigelj.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 03:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443355] Merge Review: gnumeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210354.m3L3sIUX029302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnumeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443355 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-20 23:54 EST ------- rpmlint... [njones at node ~]$ rpmlint gnumeric-* gnumeric.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnumeric-dialogs.schemas gnumeric.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnumeric/1.8.2/autoformat- templates/Colourful/.category gnumeric.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnumeric/1.8.2/autoformat- templates/Classical/.category gnumeric.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnumeric/1.8.2/autoformat- templates/3D/.category gnumeric.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnumeric-plugins.schemas gnumeric.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/gnumeric/1.8.2/plugins/py-func/py_func.py gnumeric.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnumeric/1.8.2/autoformat- templates/General/.category gnumeric.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnumeric/1.8.2/autoformat- templates/Financial/.category gnumeric.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnumeric-general.schemas gnumeric.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnumeric/1.8.2/autoformat- templates/List/.category gnumeric.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/gnumeric/1.8.2/plugins/gnome- glossary/gnome_glossary.py gnumeric-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gnumeric-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gnumeric-plugins-extras.x86_64: W: no-documentation All warnings seem reasonable... script-without-shebang - these are two plugins, for gnumeric which i'm 99.9% sure are not meant to be invoked at CLI (you could put a shebang in there and make it fail on run from console, but I'm not concerned about this). only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - (There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.) there is a .so file in /usr/lib which seems okay. .pc files belong there too but the .h I'm not so sure about.... Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines everything else looks fine I just want to check the .h file before I give the a-okay... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 04:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443355] Merge Review: gnumeric In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210426.m3L4QXWJ024321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnumeric https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443355 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-21 00:26 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/* (koji) [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: see Comment 1 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1708da12f206fea1dda5c5341dfdd3eb2d1913dd gnumeric-1.8.2.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === Issues === Help->Contents doesn't work, mainly due to yelp not been provided somewhere along the lines... This is imo a problem higher up the chain and I'm not going to require you add the dependency... Personally, I'd sooner see the discussion reported at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue92#head- c93cd512fdf8e965869b3db1ff4bc7e152ef26ea restarted and yelp provided somewhere around gnome-libs or something (think of the poor users who want help playing tetris!) ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 04:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443301] Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210452.m3L4q3m9028258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443301 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-21 00:52 EST ------- Okay, so I made a bit of a boo-boo... new version... Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance-0.20-2.fc8.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=574360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 05:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210525.m3L5Pkwp001802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client Alias: secondlife https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 agentunix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|urgent |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 07:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210738.m3L7cWk4024999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-21 03:38 EST ------- Hello; The tarball in the srpm is now on the site as http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.8/Falcon-0.8.8-fc9.tar.gz I cannot update the original package because it would break currently released debian-based distros (packagers would have tons of bells ringing as they monitor sites download pages to check for updates with automated tools). You may either use this TGZ and repackage the srpm, or you may just link it as you wish. Bests, Giancarlo Niccolai. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210806.m3L86mq7031290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210809.m3L892Nh008640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-04-21 04:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Hello; > The tarball in the srpm is now on the site as > http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.8/Falcon-0.8.8-fc9.tar.gz The normal way would be to use an original upstream tarball and Fedora to apply patches. > I cannot update the original package because it would break currently released > debian-based distros (packagers would have tons of bells ringing as they monitor > sites download pages to check for updates with automated tools). Off cause upstream can do this! It's what 10000s of projects do. Upstream work must be independent of distro specific work (packaging an rpm). If it's not, then something is very broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210811.m3L8BO4d009428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-21 04:11 EST ------- SPEC file seems to conform to the guidelines, is sane, legible, uses macros consistently. I'll finish the review once it builds in mock for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:13:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210813.m3L8D5ON009564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-21 04:13 EST ------- Built without problems No problems in build.log Package lists are sane Rpmlint does not complain Needs work: (minor, probably common to perl modules?) * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210822.m3L8MEFB011340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-21 04:22 EST ------- Well, IMHO it's not so normal to change a package without changing its version number after it has been released. Falcon 0.8.8 has not yet been released by Fedora, but it has been released by others, and changing that package wouldn't be fair, I suppose. Of course upstreams can do it and do it, but IMHO a kinder way to update things is that of changing the version number of the package. Anyhow, long story short: you have a Falcon 0.8.8 version released under GPL. There is a source package released with that policy on the site (the link I posted) and you may either pick it or use the other .tgz and patch it. Am I required to do anything else? TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210826.m3L8Q9fa002896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-21 04:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Anyhow, long story short: you have a Falcon 0.8.8 version released under GPL. > There is a source package released with that policy on the site (the link I > posted) and you may either pick it or use the other .tgz and patch it. Am I > required to do anything else? > No this is sufficient (and many thanks for doing this). Now I just need Michel to post a link to a new srpm based on this tarbal and then I can approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210824.m3L8OAbi002222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-21 04:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > Hello; > > The tarball in the srpm is now on the site as > > http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.8/Falcon-0.8.8-fc9.tar.gz > > The normal way would be to use an original upstream tarball and Fedora to apply > patches. > This is not about patches, but about adding a new license to the tarbal. Ralf, it would _really_ help if you first read the entire ticket before shooting of some random comments. > > I cannot update the original package because it would break currently released > > debian-based distros (packagers would have tons of bells ringing as they monitor > > sites download pages to check for updates with automated tools). > Off cause upstream can do this! It's what 10000s of projects do. > Upstream work must be independent of distro specific work (packaging an rpm). > > If it's not, then something is very broken. > Upstream should never respin a tarbal without a version change or some other change in the name of the tarbal, replacing an already distributed tarbal causes lots of troubles for lots of distros. Something which you know, again please read the ticket first. Also the comment you were responding from is from _upstream_! An upstream who has been very kind to Fedora, so kind as to dual license, and respin a tarbal now (with a different name as to not cause all kinda checksum alarms to go off which would have happened if the original tarbal changed). So I would like to say: Thanks Giancarlo Niccolai, the respinned (differently named) tarbal will work nicely for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210852.m3L8qgLN016582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-04-21 04:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #21) > > (In reply to comment #20) > > > Hello; > > > The tarball in the srpm is now on the site as > > > http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.8/Falcon-0.8.8-fc9.tar.gz > > > > The normal way would be to use an original upstream tarball and Fedora to apply > > patches. > > > > This is not about patches, but about adding a new license to the tarbal. Which is silly - Upstream should get used to using reasonable release policies Ralf, > it would _really_ help if you first read the entire ticket before shooting of > some random comments. I did - Openly said, your accusation embarrasses me very much. > > > I cannot update the original package because it would break currently released > > > debian-based distros (packagers would have tons of bells ringing as they monitor > > > sites download pages to check for updates with automated tools). > > Off cause upstream can do this! It's what 10000s of projects do. > > Upstream work must be independent of distro specific work (packaging an rpm). > > > > If it's not, then something is very broken. > > > > Upstream should never respin a tarbal without a version change or some other > change in the name of the tarbal. Correct. > replacing an already distributed tarbal causes > lots of troubles for lots of distros. Something which you know, again please > read the ticket first. They should release a new release - Even if a licence change is the only change. Such kind of incidents happen all the time. > Also the comment you were responding from is from _upstream_! An upstream who > has been very kind to Fedora, so kind as to dual license, and respin a tarbal > now (with a different name as to not cause all kinda checksum alarms to go off > which would have happened if the original tarbal changed). > > So I would like to say: Thanks Giancarlo Niccolai, the respinned (differently > named) tarbal will work nicely for us. I disagree. We should not ship temporary hacked forks. If a package doesn't comply to our licensing requirements, it's out. Upstream has the freedom to release a new release with the issues fixed. Their decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442009] Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210854.m3L8snHs007639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bind-libbind - The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) libbind resolver libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442009 ------- Additional Comments From atkac at redhat.com 2008-04-21 04:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) libbind compiled from RHEL4 bind package should not be used because it is not supported and it contains many bugs (at least CVE-2008-0122 as I wrote above). Best should be use libbind based on RHEL5 package or on 9.3.5 release (I prefer 9.3.5 because it contains some additional bugfixes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] New: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 Summary: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/py-openhpi.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/py-openhpi-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: An extension module that makes it possible to access HPI api functions and structures from the Python language. It supports everything that is exposed through SaHpi.h, SaHpiAtca.h, SaHpiBladeCenter.h, oHpi.h, and oh_utils.h. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 08:56:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] New: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/openhpi-subagent.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/openhpi-subagent-2.3.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The openhpi-subagent package contains the Service Availability Forum's Hardware Platform Interface SNMP sub-agent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 09:28:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804210928.m3L9SoYP023458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-04-21 05:28 EST ------- This is by no mean a temporary hacked fork. This is the old code with the new license applied. It makes an official release too, as the new licensing scheme is official, and that tar.gz will be downloadable from the site shortly. Moreover, what is commonly happening in Fedora/RH is that they have just special grants from non-gpl upstreams. Authorized patches on licenses (and non-authorized/self made patches on code) are the norm, not the exception; I cannot see what's your problem when you even receive an official new package, released by the upstream. Sorry for the frankness, but it really seems you're making fuzz for nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 10:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211005.m3LA5qNT030659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 06:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 10:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211028.m3LASgKZ024978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-04-21 06:28 EST ------- Hello Paul, Could you add me to this package, if you don't mind ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 10:38:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211038.m3LAch31026787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 06:38 EST ------- Sure, what do I need to add to the initalCC for it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 11:10:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211110.m3LBAaEU010597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-21 07:10 EST ------- I'd love to see this in EPEL, and be thankful if you could maintain it. If you have a reason not to, I'll gladly do so. (similar request has been filed for perl-HTML-Template, which is its only missing dependency to my knowledge). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 11:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211138.m3LBc2qp015338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-04-21 07:38 EST ------- Just re-post a cvs request by adding my fas name to the initialCC (which's laxathom) Thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 11:52:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211152.m3LBq6xS017712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-04-21 07:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-tools Short Description: mono-tools are a small series of tools which allows the likes of monodoc to be used outside of monodevelop Owners: pfj Branches: f9,f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj,laxathom Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 12:05:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211205.m3LC5Nia020640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-04-21 08:05 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I have fixed the problems, new srpm and spec: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/quicksynergy.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/quicksynergy-0.7-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 12:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211208.m3LC8jMa021375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-21 08:08 EST ------- Thanks, seems fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 12:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442244] Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211211.m3LCBQBu022503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-04-21 08:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) Sorry for the delay. > Well, fotox is under rapid development and at the time I am > writing this comment the latest version is 40. So: Yeah now 41 is out. > Would you ask the upstream developer to change installation scripts > to autotool based ones ? > - Current upstream-created "build" script does not accept compiler > option Will ask upstream, if the don't do it I can patch it to use the flags. > - desktop file is created under an unexpected directory ? %{_datadir}/applications > - Current installation process is rather manual > Also > - No license text is included in tarball (v40) "MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines So should be fine. I will build and upload an updated package in the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 12:15:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211215.m3LCFxIl014154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-04-21 08:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quicksynergy Short Description: Share keyboard and mouse between computers Owners: drago01 Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 12:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211233.m3LCXd9R017586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |berrange at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 13:50:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442244] Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211350.m3LDopRH001856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Program for improving image files made with a digital camera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442244 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-21 09:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - desktop file is created under an unexpected directory > ? %{_datadir}/applications What I mean here that if you use "./build" script and execute "./build install", then this script tries to create desktop file under $HOME/Desktop. > > - Current installation process is rather manual > > Also > > - No license text is included in tarball (v40) > > "MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc." > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > So should be fine. I know it. However I want you to contact with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 14:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211411.m3LEBMtl006842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-04-21 10:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets-0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm New build... always some errors with rpmlint: screenlets.noarch: W: no-documentation screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/fedora/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/xubuntu2/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/ubuntu/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/fedora2/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/arch/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/debian/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/gnome/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/slackware/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/KDE/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/suse2/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/FreeBsd/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/ubuntu2/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/suse/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/gentoo/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/debian2/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/graphfreak/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/FreeBsd2/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/screenlets/MainMenu/themes/xubuntu/theme.conf screenlets.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/screenlets/Radio/RadioScreenlet.py 0644 screenlets.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/screenlets/Radio/RadioScreenlet.py screenlets.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libnotify screenlets.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL screenlets.noarch: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/screenlets-manager.desktop please help... this conf files are just some screenlets theme configration for THIS screenlet (MainMenu)... I really need to know how to correct this... My desktop file IS ok... really ! Look at my spec file, it's very very strange to package this... Regards ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 14:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211412.m3LECQjw007005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-04-21 10:12 EST ------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm collectd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog collectd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog collectd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/collectd $prog $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-apache-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-email-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-mysql-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-nginx-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/perl-Collectd-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-sensors-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-snmp-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i386/collectd-virt-4.3.2-6.i386.rpm $ rpmlint collectd-4.3.2-6.src.rpm The warnings are rpmlint bugs, not being able to understand/interpret shell variable substitutions => PASS MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. PASS MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} PASS MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. PASS MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. PASS MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. PASS MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. PASS MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. PASS MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. PASS MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source PASS MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. PASS MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. PASS MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires PASS MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly N/A - no locales MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - no public libs, only plugins MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. PASS MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. PASS MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. PASS MUST: Each package must have a %clean section PASS MUST: Each package must consistently use macros PASS MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content PASS MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application PASS MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives PASS MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file N/A MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages PASS MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} PASS MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. PASS SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. PASS SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. PASS SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. PASS SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. PASS SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. PASS, though recommend Requires: collectd = %{version} be changed to more specific: Requires: collectd = %{version}-%{release} SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 14:18:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211418.m3LEIht6016383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-21 10:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: collectd Short Description: Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files Owners: rjones,berrange Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rjones,berrange Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 14:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211421.m3LEL92l009245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-04-21 10:21 EST ------- in fact, i wonder if it will be not better to do a package per screenlets... no ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 14:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:26:00 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211426.m3LEQ0Wi010363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-21 10:26 EST ------- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/raw-file/4629a257a781/libconcord/libconcord.spec SRPM URL:http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/libconcord/libconcord-0.20-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Apr 21 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.20-1 - update to 0.20 - removing unneeded gcc 4.3 patch I was going to include the python and perl bindings as subpackages, but realized I can't do this as noarch subpackages of an arch-specific package. Do you think it's better to include them as arch-specific packages or separate noarch packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 14:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211431.m3LEVho9019252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-21 10:31 EST ------- Thanks for the submission, Mat. Everything looks great. I have a few questions below. When we clear these up, be sure to take EPIC off the PackageRequests page on the Fedora wiki :) - there are lots of antlr warnings - do you think these are okay? - are there any unit tests for EPIC which we can use to verify the JDOM API changes? - any idea what's going on with the debuginfo extraction? I get lots of the following. I'm not super-concerned, since this is gcj debuginfo and the chances of anyone other than gcj developers being able to use it successfully is low :) extracting debug info from /var/tmp/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-3.fc8-root-overholt/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.regexp_0.6.1.jar.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-3.fc8-root-overholt/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.perleditor_0.6.15.jar.so extracting debug info from /var/tmp/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-3.fc8-root-overholt/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.debug_0.6.16.jar.so cpio: epic-0.6.22/aot-compile-rpm/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.debug_0.6.16.jar.1.jar: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: epic-0.6.22/aot-compile-rpm/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.perleditor_0.6.15.jar.1.jar: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: epic-0.6.22/aot-compile-rpm/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.perleditor_0.6.15.jar.2.jar: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: epic-0.6.22/aot-compile-rpm/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org.epic.regexp_0.6.1.jar.1.jar: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: epic-0.6.22/aot-compile-rpm/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org/epic/core/Constants.java: Cannot stat: No such file or directory cpio: epic-0.6.22/aot-compile-rpm/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-epic/org/epic/core/PerlCore.java: Cannot stat: No such file or directory - rpmlint warnings are okay to be waived - requires and provides look fine - functionality seems okay but I get an error when trying to debug about variable display needing PadWalker. Should we add perl-PadWalker to the Requires? Even if I have that installed, I don't get variables when debugging. Should I / do you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 15:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436930] Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211552.m3LFqLIx005273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ranpwd - A program to generate random passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436930 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-21 11:52 EST ------- Any progress, should not be that difficult to fix these issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 16:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211604.m3LG49P9007841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 Bug 225792 depends on bug 429769, which changed state. Bug 429769 Summary: gfs2-utils in rawhide significantly lags RHEL5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429769 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 16:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211609.m3LG9fT6000460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 ------- Additional Comments From swhiteho at redhat.com 2008-04-21 12:09 EST ------- Also updated now in rawhide/F-9. Currently all three are identical to each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 16:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211614.m3LGENbe010525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-21 12:14 EST ------- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/raw-file/0095a2f4ed35/concordance/concordance.spec SRPM URL:http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/concordance/concordance-0.20-1.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Apr 21 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.20-1 - updating to 0.20 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 16:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443449] New: Review Request: udpcast - UDP broadcast file distribution and installation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443449 Summary: Review Request: udpcast - UDP broadcast file distribution and installation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/udpcast.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/udpcast-20071228-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: UDP broadcast file distribution and installation udpcast is a program for broadcasting (reliably) a large file to many hosts. It utilises ethernet broadcasts and selective resends for efficiency. rpmlint is clean except for this: udpcast-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package I'm not sure how to fix this -- maybe just disable debuginfo? $ rpm -qlp udpcast-20071228-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm /usr/sbin/udp-receiver /usr/sbin/udp-sender /usr/share/doc/udpcast-20071228 /usr/share/doc/udpcast-20071228/COPYING /usr/share/doc/udpcast-20071228/Changelog.txt /usr/share/doc/udpcast-20071228/cmd.html /usr/share/man/man1/udp-receiver.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/udp-sender.1.gz $ rpm -q --requires -p udpcast-20071228-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 17:31:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:31:15 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211731.m3LHVFcT018489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-21 13:31 EST ------- Re: The bindings - I reviewed a bunch of existing .spec files, and having arch-specific Python sub-packages seems to be the way it works. I'm OK with shipping libconcord without bindings first, then adding them later if you want. I don't know if that would require another review for the sub-packages then though - I'll see if I can find the answer. Hopefully, I'll get a chance to finalize the review tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211807.m3LI7Pip002779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-21 14:07 EST ------- What's the proper way to start this app ? I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/hamster-applet/hamster-applet", line 28, in import gtk, gnomeapplet ImportError: No module named gnomeapplet Also, as hamster-applet ships icons in the hicolor directory, it should have "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] New: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/raw-file/cdccc785d310/ale/ale.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/ale/ale-0.9.0-1.src.rpm Description: ALE is an image-processing program used for tasks such as image mosaicking, super-resolution, deblurring, noise reduction, anti-aliasing, and scene reconstruction. Its principle of operation is synthetic capture, combining multiple inputs representing the same scene. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211816.m3LIGFDs027137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-21 14:16 EST ------- Is this one building in Fedora-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443449] Review Request: udpcast - UDP broadcast file distribution and installation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211817.m3LIHjRb027297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: udpcast - UDP broadcast file distribution and installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443449 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-21 14:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/udpcast.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/udpcast-20071228-2.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Apr 21 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 20071228-2 - BR m4. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=574605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211818.m3LIIX9t027378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-21 14:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Needs work: (minor, probably common to perl modules?) > > * The package should contain the text of the license > (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) Exactly. We include the text where it's included, otherwise just typically don't worry about it too much... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211818.m3LIIr2w004955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211818.m3LIIqr5004927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-21 14:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint Short Description: CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst Owners: cweyl Branches: F-7, F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443469] New: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443469 Summary: Review Request: pytrainer - A tool to log all your sport excursions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/raw-file/cdccc785d310/pytrainer/pytrainer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/pytrainer/pytrainer-1.5.0.0.1-2.src.rpm Description: A tool to log all your sport excursions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] New: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silfreed at silfreed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/raw-file/cdccc785d310/hdrprep/hdrprep.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/hdrprep/hdrprep-0.1.2-3.src.rpm Description: hdrprep is a Perl script for registering exposure-bracketed sequences of digital photographs. This allows you to generated High Dynamic Range (HDR) images from hand-held image sequences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 18:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211829.m3LITZYn007140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-21 14:29 EST ------- It built for me in mock: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/concordance/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 19:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443301] Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211911.m3LJB1ix006552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443301 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-21 15:11 EST ------- It seems to be already submitted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 19:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804211957.m3LJvDLQ025958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-21 15:57 EST ------- ok, review next friday then -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 20:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212035.m3LKZ44p024705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 ------- Additional Comments From arbiter at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-21 16:35 EST ------- At the moment, most of the reported issues are fixed. There are still problems moving modules to %{_libdir}/%{name} but I'm working on it. As soon as I have a working package with above issues fixed I'll publish it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 20:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212056.m3LKuXFn029024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-04-21 16:56 EST ------- It is a panel applet, so the correct way to start it is to right click on a gnome panel and add the Hamster applet. The gnomeapplet should be provided by the gnome-python2-applet package - which I mistakenly only have as a BuildRequires. I have added a lot of Requires in the new version, so it should actually now have a proper list of the packages required at runtime. I have also added hicolor-icon-theme as a Requires. New versions available here: Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/hamster-applet-0.1.7.4-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:01:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212101.m3LL15Gw030084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From apevec at redhat.com 2008-04-21 17:01 EST ------- I guess it makes sense to send the new .spec upstream: http://git.verplant.org/?p=collectd.git;a=tree;f=contrib/fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212129.m3LLTEji003566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-21 17:29 EST ------- I just checked, and the URL I provided for spec/SRPM are the one from which you can directly download the files. However, when you open it for the first time in a session, the web host will intercept your request and redirect you to the download page you saw. Try to open the same URL again, and you will access the files... Dumb host -_- I'm really sorry about that, but I do not know about any other free web host. Do you know one? Anyway, here is the SRPM: http://dl.free.fr/fjr1hvFRD/adonthell-0.3.4-0.7.fc8.src.rpm (still the same host, until I can find a better one... :S) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212137.m3LLbTMe015116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev at nigelj.com ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-21 17:37 EST ------- *** Bug 443301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:37:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443301] Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212137.m3LLbSJ4015084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Logitech Harmony Remote Control Update Utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443301 dev at nigelj.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-21 17:37 EST ------- Hmmm, I have *no* idea how I missed that okay, closing... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 328161 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212141.m3LLf8L4006675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-21 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > There is some kind of issue with the bugzilla sync script it seems. ;( > > Hopefully it will be fixed soon. It's being worked on. > Sorry for the delay. Hi, there still is no freenx-server entry for bugzilla. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:42:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212142.m3LLgpr6007018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-21 17:42 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Kevin! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freenx-client Short Description: Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol Owners: athimm Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Jon Ciesla (limb) Cvsextras Commits: no (too many people) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 21 21:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804212146.m3LLksTE008173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-21 17:46 EST ------- Hi, I did some work on the concordance package (I somehow missed the review), so you might want to take a look at http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance.spec), I havn't done any of the udev/hal stuff, but I managed to get the libraries & bindings building from the one source package. Also, by my reckoning, the License is GPLv3 (Not GPLv3+) I can't see an or later clause... And, your Source0 needs correcting to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}- %{version}.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 00:37:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220037.m3M0bZN5015982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-21 20:37 EST ------- The source files I have all say "or later", hence GPLv3+ not GPLv3. Admittedly I got all the files from CVS, not the release, but I'm on the CVS commit mailing list, and I know they haven't changed since. For example, ./libconcord/libconcord.cpp:9: * (at your option) any later version. ./concordance/concordance.c:9: * (at your option) any later version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 00:48:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220048.m3M0meZd017991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-21 20:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Hi, I did some work on the concordance package (I somehow missed the review), so you might want to > take a look at http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance.spec), I havn't done any of the udev/hal stuff, > but I managed to get the libraries & bindings building from the one source package. I plan on adding the bindings to the libconcord package in the near future, but I'm sure how it was viewed to have different package base names in the same spec file. Right now I have a review in progress for libconcord as a separate package. > Also, by my reckoning, the License is GPLv3 (Not GPLv3+) I can't see an or later clause... You need to look at the source files; they all have the "or later" clause. > And, your Source0 needs correcting to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%{name}/%{name}- > %{version}.tar.bz2 It's been fixed; I'll push new spec files out shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 01:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:03:11 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220103.m3M13B9J020851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-21 21:03 EST ------- I have a few more comments since the .spec has been updated. 1) The .spec in the SRPM and the separate URL you posted don't quite match; only 1 has a "BuildRequires: python". For completeness of review, these should match. 2) You may as well use %{mainpkg} to replace both instances of "concordance" in the Source0 URL. 3) In the %setup line, %name should be %{name}. At least for consistency, even if not functionality. 4) I believe the canonical hostname for SF downloads is downloads.sourceforge.net, not internap.dl.sourceforget.net (Source0 URL) 5) I don't think "%files ../xxx" is legal. Instead, I think you need to install those files in %install, then package them from the installation directory. Take a look at fftw2 or cmigemo (I looked at devel branches) for other .spec files that work this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 01:16:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220116.m3M1GC8b013294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From ihok at hotmail.com 2008-04-21 21:16 EST ------- Speaking as a long-time EPIC user, yes, perl-PadWalker should be in Requires. By default, with it installed, you should see 'my' variables when debugging. You can also turn on global variables (off by default). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 01:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220133.m3M1XAN0015970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-21 21:33 EST ------- Yeah, sadly it still seems to be broken. ;( Will see what I can find out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 01:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220141.m3M1ffPw027838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-21 21:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #29) > > Hi, I did some work on the concordance package (I somehow missed the > review), so you might want to > > take a look at http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/concordance.spec), I havn't done > any of the udev/hal stuff, > > but I managed to get the libraries & bindings building from the one source > package. > > I plan on adding the bindings to the libconcord package in the near future, > but I'm sure how it was viewed to have different package base names in the > same spec file. Right now I have a review in progress for libconcord as a > separate package. I queried this myself, one base package seems to fit the need, unless of course upstream are going to split it into three. However.... there is currently nothing in the Naming Guidelines that say either way. Personally I'm not fussed either way, but I prefer a single src.rpm at the moment. Personally, I'd recommend to them, that the distribute the components (concordance, libconcord, bindings etc) as separate packages but thats just my view. > > > Also, by my reckoning, the License is GPLv3 (Not GPLv3+) I can't see an or > later clause... > > You need to look at the source files; they all have the "or later" clause. Yeah, my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 06:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220604.m3M64Z5r001632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 Bug 411551 depends on bug 245699, which changed state. Bug 245699 Summary: perl-DBD-Sqlite: version 1.13 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245699 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 06:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220625.m3M6P2eK013471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-22 02:25 EST ------- BTW I also can't commit anything to freenx-server anymore. The cvs operation claims that I'm not in the ACLs, OTOH the pkgdb has me as owner. This is probably related to the CVS outage for branching, but Jesse mail wrote that all ACLs are restored. Maybe freenx-server's was not for some reason. I didn't check with any other package (with a phony commit). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 08:16:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220816.m3M8GCfF026085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-22 04:16 EST ------- Hi Alex, As discussed by mail, I'll take EPEL branches ownership. Regards, Xavier Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-XML-Writer New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: xavierb Updated EPEL CC: xavierb alexlan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 08:22:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220822.m3M8M3iK002560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 08:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220828.m3M8SsrO028406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-22 04:28 EST ------- Doh, I didn't add Alex to the owners... Corrected CVS request below : Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-XML-Writer New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: xavierb alexlan Updated EPEL CC: xavierb alexlan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 08:51:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 04:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220851.m3M8pSG9008000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-22 04:51 EST ------- Indeed, I did it wrong, the srpm is now at: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/html2ps-1.0-0.1.b5.fc9.src.rpm I think that the concordance review is under enough eyes, currently. Do you want that I have a look at another review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 09:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804220913.m3M9DLDG011713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-04-22 05:13 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: a2ps Updated Fedora Owners: twaugh,pertusus (in reference to comment #31) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 10:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221032.m3MAWn8Z025314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 10:51:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443576] New: Review Request: monodevelop-boo - boo plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443576 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-boo - boo plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-boo.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-boo-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: monodevelop-boo is a boo plugin for monodevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 10:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443578] New: Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-database.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-database-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: monodevelop-database is a database plugin for monodevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 10:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443577] New: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-java.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/monodevelop-java-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: monodevelop-java is a java plugin for monodevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 10:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221057.m3MAv4dQ029289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-04-22 06:57 EST ------- updated http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/sawfish.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/sawfish-1.3.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 12:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221234.m3MCYbLP008179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-22 08:34 EST ------- Jack: can you try Mat's packages and install perl-PadWalker and see why variables aren't showing up? Or maybe they are and it's just something wacky on my box. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 12:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443588] New: Review Request: fig2sxd - fig to sxd converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443588 Summary: Review Request: fig2sxd - fig to sxd converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/fig2sxd.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/fig2sxd-0.17-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: fig2sxd is a converter from fig to OpenOffice sxd formats. It can be used by itself or as a plugin for chemtool (automatically detected when chemtool starts up) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 13:13:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221313.m3MDDEJX016700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-22 09:13 EST ------- I uploaded an updated the srpm package to the above location at http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/synopsis-0.10-1.fc8.src.rpm rpmbuild runs fine on i386, but I get errors on x86_64, due to _libdir and py_sitedir variables in synopsis.spec being expanded to 'unexpected' values (see my previous message). Any help is highly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 13:31:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221331.m3MDVTbS020396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 ------- Additional Comments From arbiter at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-22 09:31 EST ------- FYI: Darryl L. Pierce (dpierce at redhat.com) wants to co-maintain this package and I agreed to co-maintain the package with him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 14:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221404.m3ME4b1N026871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-22 10:04 EST ------- License: it is GPLv3+ (ui/input.cc fro example) fftw is GPLv2+ or later -> compatible ImageMagick-devel tagged as freeware ?!? -> don't knwo if license is compatible... I may raise FE-Legal Missing BR (optionnals but seems useful) : ImageMagick-devel fftw-devel >= 3.0.0 There is also some configure options that would need some testing.(or advices from upstream). I would add this: --enable-wmx --with-imagemagick --with-fftw3 --with-hashmap=gnu scripts are present in a subdirectory. I expect they could be installed in /usr/bin but transform seems too generic name, but be valuable to rename as ale-transform and to warn upstream (or warn first). I only have tested F-8 x86_64 in mock - F-9 wasn't in good shape, so i will test later...(don't know if new option introduced others gcc43 bug). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 14:14:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221414.m3MEEVNd029217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-22 10:14 EST ------- Ok found: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ImageMagick is compatible with GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 14:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442513] Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221432.m3MEWiae008108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442513 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-22 10:32 EST ------- Add F-9 branch. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Cache-Lite Short Description: Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP Owners: remi Branches: F-7, F-8, F-9, EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 15:22:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443613] New: Review Request: json-glib - Library for JavaScript Object Notation format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443613 Summary: Review Request: json-glib - Library for JavaScript Object Notation format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bdpepple at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/json-glib.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/json-glib-0.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: json-glib is a library providing serialization and deserialization support for the JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=574814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 15:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221542.m3MFgSmh016622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(claudio at claudiotom | |asoni.it) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-22 11:42 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 15:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222326] Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221548.m3MFmL9v018133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gxine - GTK frontend for the xine multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222326 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 11:48 EST ------- mass branching has been completed, so this package should now have a F-9 branch. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 15:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221559.m3MFxfYG026919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-22 11:59 EST ------- Please add -p to install to preserve timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 16:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221601.m3MG1XGv021413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |443467 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 16:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221601.m3MG1Xpu021447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |443468 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 16:32:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221632.m3MGWMCX002927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 Bug 302271 depends on bug 302261, which changed state. Bug 302261 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 16:32:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221632.m3MGWLGn002895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-22 12:32 EST ------- Reopening. I finally got a hold of Cal, and he has agreed to relicense CSS.pm to resolve this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 16:48:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221648.m3MGm8Gj031246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-22 12:48 EST ------- I forgot to say that the string.h tweak that is done at the begining seems scary to me... I wonder why this is needed. (I will check futher...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221701.m3MH1Dgu001549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225235] Merge Review: a2ps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221703.m3MH3ARp009367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: a2ps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225235 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:03 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221703.m3MH3Teq009414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-22 13:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I forgot to say that the string.h tweak that is done at the begining seems scary > to me... I wonder why this is needed. (I will check futher...) Which string.h tweak? The cstring patch for GCC 4.3? BTW, I'm also working on an update that addresses your BRs in the comment #1; building in mock right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:01:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 224402] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221701.m3MH1dPB009059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-pulse - GStreamer 0.10 plugin for the PulseAudio sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224402 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:01 EST ------- I assume you meant gstreamer-plugins-pulse for the package here, not "foobar". cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:07:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221707.m3MH7Ovd002830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250240] Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221708.m3MH8SGi010524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linkage - Lightweight bittorent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250240 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:08 EST ------- All packages have been branched for F-9 now. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221713.m3MHD3Fj003971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:13 EST ------- I assume you wanted a F-9 branch as well? cvs done (with F-9 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:15:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221715.m3MHFOmo004808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:15 EST ------- I assume you wanted a F-9 branch as well. cvs done (with F-9 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221719.m3MHJ6OM012881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221721.m3MHL2rK013689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442299] Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221728.m3MHSHSk007380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:26:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221726.m3MHQFJD007163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:26 EST ------- I assume you want a F-9 branch as well? cvs done (with F-9 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442513] Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221732.m3MHWp8D008457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442513 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:31:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221731.m3MHVQdc015674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:36:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221736.m3MHaNkH009346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:36 EST ------- Why deny cvsextras commits here? Any reason? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221734.m3MHY4tl008643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-22 13:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:41:59 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221741.m3MHfxMC017600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-22 13:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > 1) The .spec in the SRPM and the separate URL you posted don't quite match; only 1 > has a "BuildRequires: python". For completeness of review, these should match. This must be rpmbuild stripping out the BR since this SRPM is the one from rpmbuild and not the re-packaged one from mock. I guess I'll just remove it from the spec file as well. > 2) You may as well use %{mainpkg} to replace both instances of "concordance" in the > Source0 URL. I like to keep the package name explicitly in the download URL. > 3) In the %setup line, %name should be %{name}. At least for consistency, even if > not functionality. Thanks, fixed. > 4) I believe the canonical hostname for SF downloads is downloads.sourceforge.net, > not internap.dl.sourceforget.net (Source0 URL) Thansk - I missed that when I moved from CVS back to the real source. Fixed. > 5) I don't think "%files ../xxx" is legal. Instead, I think you need to install > those files in %install, then package them from the installation directory. > > Take a look at fftw2 or cmigemo (I looked at devel branches) for other .spec > files that work this way. I think I'll tackle this a different way by removing the '%setup -n' stuff and cd to the proper directory for configuring and building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221756.m3MHulLb013450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-22 13:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Why deny cvsextras commits here? Any reason? Other people can fix whatever they want on all my packages, but for the artwork I'd like to be in control, since I'm maintaining it upstream too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443468] Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221758.m3MHwqxK013747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hdrprep - Align digicam images and fix EXIF information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443468 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-22 13:58 EST ------- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/3991dca98947/hdrprep/hdrprep.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/hdrprep/hdrprep-0.1.2-4.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Apr 22 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.1.2-4 - explicitly setting mode on dir creation; preserving timestamps on script install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 17:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443467] Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221758.m3MHwtO4013835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ale - Combines multiple inputs of the same scene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443467 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-22 13:58 EST ------- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/3991dca98947/ale/ale.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/ale/ale-0.9.0-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Apr 21 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.9.0-2 - adding additional configuration options (imagemagick, fftw3, wmx, gnu hashmap) and build requires to satisfy them - installing scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 18:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221806.m3MI6RgH024247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-22 14:06 EST ------- Great spot! Thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 18:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221827.m3MIRpbx020853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 ------- Additional Comments From lvillani at binaryhelix.net 2008-04-22 14:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/mail/antispam/dspam.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9.src.rpm Notes: Most of the reported issues should be fixed now, there are still some rpmlint warnings and errors to be fixed. * Tue Apr 22 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 3.8.0-24 - Fixed macro usage - Now using dist tag - Removed credit from description - Inter package dependencies are now in EVR format - Removed unneeded requires for dspam-devel - Removed unneeded config.h and config_shared.h - Fixed sysvinit script install path - Service is no longer enabled by default - Added a reload entry to sysvinit script (at the moment it's just a restart alias) - Fixed various scriptlets - Fixed module paths - Do not install CGI scripts anymore, upstream doesn't install it. (considering the option to make them available as a separate subpackage) - Unified documentation directories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 18:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442513] Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221838.m3MIcnNq032104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Cache-Lite - Fast and Safe little cache system for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442513 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 19:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233585] Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804221904.m3MJ4IGt029134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Writer - A simple Perl module for writing XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233585 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-22 15:04 EST ------- built for EL-4 and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 19:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] New: Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 Summary: Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/sip-redirect.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/sip-redirect-0.1.2-1.src.rpm sip-redirect is a tiny SIP redirect server written in Perl. It is IPv4 and IPv6 capable, but the IPv6 support is optional. The RFC 3261 was the base for this simple and very configurable implementation. There is neither TCP nor multicast support programmed in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 20:20:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441187] Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804222020.m3MKKLnZ022614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-client - Free client libraries and binaries for the NX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441187 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-22 16:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I assume you wanted a F-9 branch as well. > > cvs done (with F-9 branch added). Thanks - yes, I was still in the past :) (although I'll contact releng before building anything for F9 at this point in time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 20:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804222020.m3MKK1Nt013580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-22 16:20 EST ------- @Richard Are you still here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 22:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804222237.m3MMbtoh018240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-22 18:37 EST ------- ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-7.20080221git.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ocfs2-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-3245 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 22 22:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430399] Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804222259.m3MMxeAJ015312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kstart - Daemon version of kinit for Kerberos v5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430399 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From simon at sxw.org.uk 2008-04-22 18:59 EST ------- Built. Available now for EL-5, F-7 and F-8. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 01:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230114.m3N1ECql014471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-22 21:14 EST ------- Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/a8df2c0857ab/concordance/concordance.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/concordance/concordance-0.20-2.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Apr 21 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.20-2 - fixed Source0 url - changing to build/install dir rather than setting it in setup macro - install using autoconf script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 01:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:15:54 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230115.m3N1Fs7p006818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-22 21:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/libconcord/libconcord-0.20-2.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/a8df2c0857ab/libconcord/libconcord.spec %changelog * Mon Apr 21 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.20-2 - fixed Source0 url - changing to build/install dir rather than setting it in setup macro - adding perl/python bindings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 02:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230201.m3N21Egx014386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-22 22:01 EST ------- OK, JRuby 1.1.1 came out earlier today and has some interesting new things to deal with. It adds three new build-time dependencies (all three of which were formerly part of JRuby proper, but have been split off as separate projects). I'm working on making rpms for those dependencies and getting review requests up for them. When I do I'll add them as blockers for this bug. Hopefully we can get jruby into Fedora sometime before F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 02:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] New: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/bytelist.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/bytelist-0.1-0.1.svn6558.fc8.src.rpm Description: A small java library for manipulating lists of bytes. Note: this is a dependency of JRuby 1.1.1. It's *very* small and should be extremely quick to review. I've built it in Koji (no missing BR's) at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577074 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 02:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230253.m3N2rqHD000492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |417511 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 02:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230253.m3N2rrdN000521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |443734 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 03:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:32:01 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230332.m3N3W1G2032738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-22 23:32 EST ------- One problem I found, via rpmlint is: libconcord-perl.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/concord/concord.so 0555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 03:38:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:38:01 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230338.m3N3c1Ma001171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-22 23:38 EST ------- Also, I think (at least in F9/devel) you need to package Python egg-info files; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs. Related to this, in %build, there is: %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 I think this should be: %if 0%{?fedora} > 8 because F8 also needs the "import setuptools" stuff to create eggs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 03:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:46:11 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230346.m3N3kBli010485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-22 23:46 EST ------- Ignore the following part of comment 20; I didn't check "%files python" carefully enough to notice that all files in %{python_sitearch} are packaged. > Also, I think (at least in F9/devel) you need to package Python egg-info files; > see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs. However, everything "Related to ..." and after still applies, I believe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 03:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230355.m3N3t0fT011586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |417511 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 03:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230355.m3N3t0mA011611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |443741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 03:54:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] New: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jna-posix.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jna-posix-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Common cross-project/cross-platform POSIX APIs for Java. Note: this is a dependency of JRuby 1.1.1. I've built it in Koji (no missing BR's) at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577179 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 04:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] New: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jvyamlb.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jvyamlb-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: YAML processor for Java (originally extracted from the JRuby project). Note: this is a dependency of JRuby 1.1.1. It can't be built in Koji yet because it depends upon bytelist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 04:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230422.m3N4M0HP016778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |443750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 04:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230421.m3N4Lxfk016754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |443750 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 04:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230421.m3N4LwRD016733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |443734 OtherBugsDependingO| |417511 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 04:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441699] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230456.m3N4uQvX014537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-CGI-Untaint - CGI::Untaint Plugin for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441699 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-23 00:56 EST ------- Imported and built in rawhide. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 05:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230541.m3N5f9Wg030472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 Bug 441027 depends on bug 440650, which changed state. Bug 440650 Summary: unopkg runs 'mktemp --tmpdir' which fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440650 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-23 01:41 EST ------- openoffice.org-ooolatex-4.0.0-0.5.beta2.fc8.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 08:13:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230813.m3N8DHqR025660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-23 04:13 EST ------- Package build fine for F-8 and F-9. I request an update for F-8 but for F-9 i don't know. Do you think it's still possible to ask rel-eng to include it in F9-final ? It fails for devel (F-10) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577314&name=build.log but i can't understand why. Help ? It fails for F-7 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577305&name=root.log because qwtplot3d-qt4-devel does not exist so i think qwtplot3d-devel has not been rebuilt against qt4. Maybe i can let this build as this beacause F-7 will reach end of life quite soon ? It fails also for EL-5 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38814-scidavis-0.1.2-1.el5/ppc/root.log because PyQt4-devel and qwtplot3d-qt4-devel. For this build i'm not sure what to do. Maybe the best would be to bugzilla these packages to ask the maintainer to build their for EL-5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 08:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] New: Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Summary: Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomas.moschny at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms-0.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: LMMS aims to be a free alternative to popular (but commercial and closed- source) programs like FruityLoops/FL Studio, Cubase and Logic allowing you to produce music with your computer. This includes creation of loops, synthesizing and mixing sounds, arranging samples, having fun with your MIDI-keyboard and much more. LMMS combines the features of a tracker-/sequencer-program and those of powerful synthesizers, samplers, effects etc. in a modern, user-friendly and easy to use graphical user-interface. Features * Song-Editor for arranging the song * creating beats and basslines using the Beat-/Bassline-Editor * easy-to-use piano-roll for editing patterns and melodies * instrument- and effect-plugins * support for hosting VST(i)- and LADSPA-plugins (instruments/effects) * automation-editor * MIDI-support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 08:25:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230825.m3N8PUF7020374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-23 04:25 EST ------- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=576349 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 08:28:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230828.m3N8St6x020730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-23 04:28 EST ------- scratch build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 08:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230833.m3N8XvOr029419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-23 04:33 EST ------- scratch build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 08:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230859.m3N8xVKp026002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-23 04:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Package build fine for F-8 and F-9. > I request an update for F-8 but for F-9 i don't know. Do you think it's still > possible to ask rel-eng to include it in F9-final ? I think so. Request tagging into f9 final as described in [1], and explain that it is not really a freeze break, as the package was not frozen given it is a new package. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy > It fails for devel (F-10) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577314&name=build.log but i > can't understand why. Help ? Can't find -lssl. Hm, I think it should be a part of openssl-devel -- try adding it to BuildRequires. > It fails for F-7 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577305&name=root.log because > qwtplot3d-qt4-devel does not exist so i think qwtplot3d-devel has not been > rebuilt against qt4. Maybe i can let this build as this beacause F-7 will reach > end of life quite soon ? > It fails also for EL-5 > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38814-scidavis-0.1.2-1.el5/ppc/root.log > because PyQt4-devel and qwtplot3d-qt4-devel. For this build i'm not sure what to > do. Maybe the best would be to bugzilla these packages to ask the maintainer to > build their for EL-5? Yep, I won't worry about F-7, since noone should really be using it in three weeks, but if you want this to go to EPEL, probably the best thing you can do is to ask the respective maintainers to create EL-5 branches via bugzilla. Note that in case they won't respond or won't want to maintian EL-5 branches, you can request and maintain the branches you need as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 09:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230904.m3N94EHH002438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cattelan at xfs.org) ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-23 05:04 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 09:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230912.m3N9CrS0028732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 thomas.moschny at gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.11-4.fc7 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 09:26:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429496] Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230926.m3N9QiNr031882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stun - Implements the stun protocol Alias: stun-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429496 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-23 05:26 EST ------- I see only minor issues: * please rename the patch to stun-0.96-whatthepatchdoes.patch * use -p at install to preserve the timestemps * the server package does not contain the RFC file after these minor issues are fixed, this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 09:49:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434707] Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230949.m3N9nKm4011627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-23 05:49 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm * Wed Apr 23 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 3.7.1-1 - New upstream version 3.7.1. - Fixed upstream URL. - Depend on latest type-conv. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 09:52:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804230952.m3N9qWbS004391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-23 05:52 EST ------- F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577716 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577728 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=577730 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 10:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:35:00 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231035.m3NAZ0ah011647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-04-23 06:34 EST ------- Perl bindings looks ok. Only fix the file from #19. It should have 644 permission as others perl scripts. Do you have some perl tests for it? Usually you should run them with 'make tests' from spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 11:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231111.m3NBBZd8027002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-23 07:11 EST ------- 1.08 is released, and it is dual licensed, GPL+ or Artistic (just like Perl). http://search.cpan.org/~iamcal/CSS-1.08/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 13:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443797] New: Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443797 Summary: Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/comedilib/comedilib.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/comedilib/comedilib.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=578251 Description: Comedilib is a user-space library that provides a developer-friendly interface to Comedi devices. Included in the Comedilib distribution is documentation, configuration and calibration utilities, and demonstration programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 13:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443797] Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231304.m3ND4gRd009013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443797 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 13:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443797] Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231309.m3ND9vQJ010148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443797 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-23 09:09 EST ------- SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/comedilib/comedilib-0.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm (correcting, so that QA script is happy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:03:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231403.m3NE3Ptc021279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-23 10:03 EST ------- This works only with NetworkManager 0.6.4, that is in RHEL-5, and thus is only intended for Fedora EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] New: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 Summary: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/NetworkManager-pptp-0.6.4-1.el5.i386/NetworkManager-pptp-0.6.4-1.el5.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/NetworkManager-pptp.spec mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/NetworkManager-pptp-0.6.4-1.el5.i386/ Description: PPTP support for NetworkManager This package contains software for integrating PPTP VPN support with the NetworkManager and the GNOME desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231405.m3NE5QiM031289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |nm-pptp-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231408.m3NE8Ivb022279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 yawara at quipo.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yawara at quipo.it ------- Additional Comments From yawara at quipo.it 2008-04-23 10:08 EST ------- about NM_DBUS_SIGNAL_STATE_CHANGE you can safely add the following lines to network-status-agent.c: #ifndef NM_DBUS_SIGNAL_STATE_CHANGE #define NM_DBUS_SIGNAL_STATE_CHANGE "StateChange" #endif but about NM_DBUS_INTERFACE_DEVICES I don't really know. that was a macro that used to point to org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.Devices but that class doesn't exist anymore in the dbus api. I've found this link about the old api, hoping it's of any help: http://people.redhat.com/dcbw/NetworkManager/NetworkManager%20DBUS%20API.txt sigh, I hate both nm and dbus!! how can they change the api that way without documenting it??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:12:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231412.m3NECMnS023163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-23 10:12 EST ------- Just two things I noticed now; Calling ldconfig in scriptlets most likely doesn't make sense, since we probably don't install libraries just, plugins and I did not comment the patches. I'll address those next time I roll packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231413.m3NEDjHl000797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From yawara at quipo.it 2008-04-23 10:13 EST ------- Oh I forgot to mention that what we're looking for could be org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.getDevices() that indeed returns an array of devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 14:21:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231421.m3NELfhj025030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 dhorak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:17:22 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231517.m3NFHM0a004068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-23 11:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Also, I think (at least in F9/devel) you need to package Python egg-info files; > see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs. The python stuff wants to install to sitelib instead of sitearch now that I'm building the egg-info for F8. Are you aware of any way to fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231523.m3NFNNIV005305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 ------- Additional Comments From yawara at quipo.it 2008-04-23 11:23 EST ------- ok all obsolete now sorry. revision 448 has fixed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:21:12 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231521.m3NFLCwE014468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-23 11:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Perl bindings looks ok. Only fix the file from #19. It should have 644 > permission as others perl scripts. Do you have some perl tests for it? Usually > you should run them with 'make tests' from spec file. When I enable the tests I get the following error: + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl Can't load 'blib/arch/auto/concord/concord.so' for module concord: blib/arch/auto/concord/concord.so: undefined symbol: get_flash_part_num at /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/DynaLoader.pm line 230. at blib/lib/concord.pm line 11 Compilation failed in require at test.pl line 38. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at test.pl line 38. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231541.m3NFfRfm009156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-04-23 11:41 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: farsight New Branches: OLPC2 Updated Fedora Owners: gdesmott,bpepple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:39:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231539.m3NFde5x008487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-04-23 11:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libjingle New Branches: OLPC2 Updated Fedora Owners: gdesmott bpepple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231542.m3NFgnYJ018819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-04-23 11:42 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gstreamer-plugins-farsight New Branches: OLPC2 Updated Fedora Owners: gdesmott,bpepple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 15:45:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231545.m3NFjK77019389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-04-23 11:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: telepathy-stream-engine New Branches: OLPC2 Updated Fedora Owners: gdesmott,bpepple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231608.m3NG8fGQ014952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-23 12:08 EST ------- At this moment i able to find anyremote packages only in: .../updates/testing/8 So, what do i need to: 1. push anyremote package from updates/testing/8 to updates/8 ? 2. push anyremote to Fedora 9 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:21:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231621.m3NGL0hI017863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207685 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-23 12:20 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:20:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207141] Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231620.m3NGKri6017822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: farsight - A audio/video conferencing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207141 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-23 12:20 EST ------- CVS done. BTW, the branch is "OLPC-2"; confused me for a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205138] Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231621.m3NGLIYk027381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libjingle - GoogleTalk implementation of Jingle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205138 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-23 12:21 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218217] Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231621.m3NGL8U6027334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-stream-engine - Telepathy client to handle media streaming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218217 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-23 12:21 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231622.m3NGMl3A027538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyremote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-23 12:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #67) > At this moment i able to find anyremote packages only in: > .../updates/testing/8 > > So, what do i need to: > 1. push anyremote package from updates/testing/8 to updates/8 ? For me you seem to have requested to do so, so please just wait. > 2. push anyremote to Fedora 9 ? This is not needed. anyremote will be pushed to F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231627.m3NGRfr3028423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-23 12:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > Package build fine for F-8 and F-9. > > I request an update for F-8 but for F-9 i don't know. Do you think it's still > > possible to ask rel-eng to include it in F9-final ? > > I think so. Request tagging into f9 final as described in [1], and explain that > it is not really a freeze break, as the package was not frozen given it is a new > package. > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy It's ok > > > It fails for devel (F-10) > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577314&name=build.log but i > > can't understand why. Help ? > > Can't find -lssl. Hm, I think it should be a part of openssl-devel -- try adding > it to BuildRequires. I add openssl-devel to BR and now it builds fine but i don't understand why i have to add this between F-9 and devel ... > > > It fails for F-7 > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577305&name=root.log because > > qwtplot3d-qt4-devel does not exist so i think qwtplot3d-devel has not been > > rebuilt against qt4. Maybe i can let this build as this beacause F-7 will reach > > end of life quite soon ? > > It fails also for EL-5 > > > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38814-scidavis-0.1.2-1.el5/ppc/root.log > > because PyQt4-devel and qwtplot3d-qt4-devel. For this build i'm not sure what to > > do. Maybe the best would be to bugzilla these packages to ask the maintainer to > > build their for EL-5? > > Yep, I won't worry about F-7, since noone should really be using it in three > weeks, but if you want this to go to EPEL, probably the best thing you can do is > to ask the respective maintainers to create EL-5 branches via bugzilla. Note > that in case they won't respond or won't want to maintian EL-5 branches, you can > request and maintain the branches you need as well. I will not worry about F-7 and EL-5 because it seems quite difficult to have have it built against EL-5! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231645.m3NGjngm032294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-23 12:45 EST ------- > I add openssl-devel to BR and now it builds fine but i don't understand why i > have to add this between F-9 and devel ... One possible explanation is that openssl-devel was part of buildsys-build group, but no longer is. That would make sense, as Fedora tends to prefer NSS library to OpenSSL for cryptography. I am not sure about that though. > I will not worry about F-7 and EL-5 because it seems quite difficult to have > have it built against EL-5! Are there more difficulties other than presence of those packages? I can assist if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:49:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:49:25 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231649.m3NGnP2X023072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-23 12:49 EST ------- Re comment #22: Shouldn't the permission be 755 like any other .so file? All .so files I have in /usr/lib/perl have 755 permissions. Re comment #23: Is this a problem - perhaps that's just the way it works? Although, I guess on 64-bit archs, it means the 32-bit package would conflict. I guess check how other Python packages work. Re comment #24: This sounds like there's a bug in the Perl bindings, perhaps referencing a symbol that libconcord.so doesn't expose? I'd guess the upstream mailing list would be the most likely place to find a fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 16:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231654.m3NGs7DI024041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-04-23 12:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > > I add openssl-devel to BR and now it builds fine but i don't understand why i > > have to add this between F-9 and devel ... > > One possible explanation is that openssl-devel was part of buildsys-build group, > but no longer is. That would make sense, as Fedora tends to prefer NSS library > to OpenSSL for cryptography. I am not sure about that though. > > > > I will not worry about F-7 and EL-5 because it seems quite difficult to have > > have it built against EL-5! > > Are there more difficulties other than presence of those packages? I can assist > if needed. see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443782 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 17:22:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231722.m3NHMnxE007488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |walters at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 17:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231748.m3NHmZmB007724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-23 13:48 EST ------- Updated package: - 1.08 - Fix license - Simplify find options - Fix file endings spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-CSS.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/html2wiki/perl-CSS-1.08-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 17:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443850] New: Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443850 Summary: Review Request: pywebkitgtk - Python Bindings for WebKit-gtk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/pywebkitgtk/pywebkitgtk.spec SRPM URL: http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/pywebkitgtk/pywebkitgtk-0.3-0.1.git9824a495.src.rpm Description: The purpose of pywebkitgtk is to bring an alternative web engine to Python/GTK+ application developers who might need a web browser engine for their next application or developers wishing to have a better browser engine that they can access to using the Python programming language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 17:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231754.m3NHsVDU013666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-23 13:54 EST ------- * Spec looks fine - I'd change the rm lib/jna.jar to: rm lib/*.jar to be safe x rpmlint says: jna-posix.noarch: W: no-documentation, need %doc README.txt ? Why do we have a custom build.xml instead of using mvn-jpp? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 17:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231759.m3NHxtNL010103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-23 13:59 EST ------- Fixed, now builds fine in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=579270 New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/pyke-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/pyke.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 18:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 329331] Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231805.m3NI5Jvf011733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gdata - A Python module for accessing online Google services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=329331 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 18:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231821.m3NILY4I019530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-23 14:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * Spec looks fine > - I'd change the rm lib/jna.jar to: rm lib/*.jar to be safe Sure. > x rpmlint says: jna-posix.noarch: W: no-documentation, need %doc README.txt Oops :). > ? Why do we have a custom build.xml instead of using mvn-jpp? >From the looks of the pom.xml it required wagon-WebDAV, which isn't a part of Fedora's maven-wagon package. I've opened a bug for that a while ago (rhbz# 442641). I'm also lazy and this custom build.xml works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 18:53:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231853.m3NIrm8K021920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-23 14:53 EST ------- Well, I caught a cold so maybe I am missing something... however for 3.8.0-24: * undefined macro - %_dspam_webapp seems undefined. * %post/%postun for subpackages ----------------------------------------------- %post backend-mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun backend-mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig ----------------------------------------------- - These types of scriptlets are now not needed as modules are not installed under default ldconfig search paths. * Library installation directory - On the other hand, installing lib%{name}*.so under %_libdir/%name is not right as ----------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# ldd -r /usr/sbin/dspam 2>&1 | grep -v /lib undefined symbol: __syslog_lock (/usr/sbin/dspam) undefined symbol: lc (/usr/sbin/dspam) undefined symbol: _ds_prepare_path_for (/usr/sbin/dspam) ...... undefined symbol: dspam_getsource (/usr/sbin/dspam) linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) libdspam.so.7 => not found ----------------------------------------------- I guess -24 is not working for you. * Unifying documents directory - Well, I think unifying documents directory is preferable, however your current method is undesirable (actually this mistake is not uncommon) * First you create the directory ----------------------------------------------- 1336 + /usr/bin/install -Dd /var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0/pgsql ----------------------------------------------- At this stage the directory %buildroot%_defaultrootdir/%name-%version exists. * Then you move the directory: ----------------------------------------------- 1338 + /bin/mv /var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam /var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0 ----------------------------------------------- This creates %buildroot%_defaultrootdir/%name-%version/%name and moves files under there, which I guess is not what you want. * And the problem also occurs at %doc. What %doc actually does is that: ----------------------------------------------- 1379 Processing files: dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9 1380 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45745 1381 + umask 022 1382 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD 1383 + cd dspam-3.8.0 1384 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0 1385 + export DOCDIR 1386 + rm -rf /var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0 1387 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0 1388 + cp -pr CHANGELOG /var/tmp/dspam-3.8.0-24.fc9-root/usr/share/doc/dspam-3.8.0 ----------------------------------------------- This explains what %doc does, i.e. - First %doc _removes_ %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/%name-%version. So all files installed under this directory are gone. - Then %doc creates %buildroot%_defaultdocdir. * rpmlint issue ----------------------------------------------- dspam.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean dspam.i386: E: shell-syntax-error-in-%preun dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_addattribute.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_attach.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_create.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_destroy.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_detach.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_getsource.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_init.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz dspam-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/man/man3/dspam_process.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libdspam.3.gz ----------------------------------------------- Summary: - Please add %clean section - There is a syntax error in %preun of dspam ----------------------------------------------- %preun if [ "$1" = 0 ]; then /sbin/service %{name} stop >/dev/null 2>& ^^^^^ /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name} fi ----------------------------------------------- - Symlinks should be relative, not absolute. * %pre script - %pre script is missing (needed for registering dspam user/group: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups ) * Directory ownership issue ----------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost dspam]$ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/lib/dspam file /usr/lib/dspam is not owned by any package ----------------------------------------------- * %_mandir files attribution - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. * %defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * autotool-generated header files inclusion - As said before, please remove config.h from %_includedir/%name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 18:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231855.m3NItQES022578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-04-23 14:55 EST ------- "find ... -delete" won't work in EL4 so in case you have plans to ship this package in EPEL4, I'd suggest reverting back to the "find ... -exec ..." versions. BuildRequires: glibc-common is pretty much superfluous, it's brought in by a lot of things in the minimal build root set. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30-2 The shipped examples operate on t/css_simple so I think it would be good to ship it as examples/t/css_simple in docs so that the examples work as is when invoked from the examples/ dir. All of the above are just non-blocker suggestions, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:03:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231903.m3NJ3OSu023985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-23 15:03 EST ------- [tasaka1 at localhost ganyremote]$ md5sum */*gz 614f3d8ab4858e47839182dd49fc6290 ganyremote-2.8-1.fc8/ganyremote-2.8.tar.gz d25ab9d85db6e6ae2f2dd6062783bf8f ganyremote-2.8-2.fc8/ganyremote-2.8.tar.gz Would you explain what happened? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231907.m3NJ7u2f029287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-23 15:07 EST ------- Note: - You seem to be the upstream of ganyremote. If so, please don't modify the released tarball without changing the version. This makes a confusion on people who will compile/installl ganyremote by themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:23:02 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231923.m3NJN2UJ028372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-04-23 15:23 EST ------- This should fix the perl .so permission (755) and installs the python bindings to %{python_sitelib} (multilib-cmp.py doesn't complain). Spec URL: https://rpm.silfreed.net:8002/index.cgi/file/da8ff28c83e0/libconcord/libconcord.spec SRPM URL: http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/libconcord/libconcord-0.20-2.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Apr 23 2008 Douglas E. Warner 0.20-3 - fixed Source0 url to downloads.sourceforge.net instead of dl.sourceforge.net - fixing mode of concord.so - fixing python egg generation; adding buildrequire for python-setuptools-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231928.m3NJSRbG029437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 cfeist at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231928.m3NJSI3g029385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2008-04-23 15:28 EST ------- Everything looks good except output of rpmlint on cluster-snmp. You should be able to remove the dep in libvirt. cluster-snmp.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvirt Once this is fixed I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231929.m3NJT6rr001443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 cfeist at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231930.m3NJUeIe030253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 ------- Additional Comments From rmccabe at redhat.com 2008-04-23 15:30 EST ------- Removed the dependency, and posted an updated spec file and srpm at http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/clustermon.spec and http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/clustermon-0.13.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433679] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231933.m3NJXmS3002461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 cfeist at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From cfeist at redhat.com 2008-04-23 15:33 EST ------- Looks good, rpmlint gives no output (which is good). I approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443871] New: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Mini/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-CPAN-Mini-0.568-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-CPAN-Mini.spec Description: CPAN::Mini provides a simple mechanism to build and update a minimal mirror of the CPAN on your local disk. It contains only those files needed to install the newest version of every distribution. Those files are: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 19:53:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443871] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804231953.m3NJr0v9007138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Mini - Create a minimal mirror of CPAN Alias: perl-CPAN-Mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443871 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-04-23 15:52 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=579632 SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-CPAN-Mini-0.568-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-CPAN-Mini.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 20:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232030.m3NKUS2d014083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-23 16:30 EST ------- > All of the above are just non-blocker suggestions, approved. Great, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CSS Short Description: Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Owners: terjeros Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 20:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232056.m3NKuv9I019477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-23 16:56 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ocaml-findlib New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 21:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232142.m3NLgsla029644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rshade at rightscale.com 2008-04-23 17:42 EST ------- On line 126 you use the collectd.conf in src/, at present I don't think this will work, there is no "Include "/etc/collectd.d"" in that file so all subpackages will not work. Also I think the collectd.conf will have the problem of every config option having /usr/ in front of it. The config in contrib/redhat/ addresses the problem, but we may want to create a patch for src/collectd.conf.in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 21:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232146.m3NLk1Ff028872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 cattelan at xfs.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cattelan at xfs.org) | ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at xfs.org 2008-04-23 17:46 EST ------- Sorry I've been out of town and busy with some other things the last few weeks. I have an updated spec file but am still unclear about a few things. specifically the removal of the "shebang lines" not sure why that needs to be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 22:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] New: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-omake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-omake-0.9.8.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis rpmlint gives some warnings about file encodings on some peculiarly named '*.ai' files (which are really PDFs) and some *.ps and *.eps files (where presumably end of line encodings don't matter). Apart from that the package is pretty clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 22:38:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232238.m3NMcGCs006061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-23 18:38 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-omake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-omake-0.9.8.5-2.fc8.src.rpm * Wed Apr 23 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.9.8.5-2 - Added stdin/stdout fix patch from Debian. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=579857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 22:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232255.m3NMtepP010877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-04-23 18:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > specifically the removal of the "shebang lines" not sure why that needs > to be done? A text file meant to be sourced and not executed simply shouldn't have a #! in the first line. Seems common though for python files, and should be fixed upstream. Meanwhile, a simple cmd like the one I gave earlier fixes this for the package and keeps rpmlint quiet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 22:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232258.m3NMwqpl009300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-23 18:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eet Short Description: Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression Owners: stalwart Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 22:59:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232259.m3NMx7t9011282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Apr 23 23:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804232346.m3NNkePs017855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-23 19:46 EST ------- ok, the bugzilla sync script is fixed now, so I see freenx-server in bugzilla now. :) also, the CVS was likely fallout after the mass branching... is it working ok now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 01:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240107.m3O17Kwj000553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-23 21:07 EST ------- Ignore previous comment; didn't notice that you were replying to Ralf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 01:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240105.m3O15OVf000330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-23 21:05 EST ------- This is not a fuzz over nothing, unfortunately: the source URL does not match the source tarball in the SRPM. The license grant itself is fine; what I'm saying is, either add the additional file as a separate source, or incorporate the new file in a new tarball *and* make the tarball available. The third way, incorporating the file but not publishing it, is not good. I'll do an updated SRPM a bit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 01:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240110.m3O1Ax2X001279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-23 21:10 EST ------- New Spec/SRPM URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jruby.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jruby-1.1.1-4.fc8.src.rpm It won't build on koji yet because of missing bytelist/jna-posix/jvyamlb. But those packages are available as srpms in the blocker bugs on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 01:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442917] [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240115.m3O1FSnG032473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [FEATURE] Create ofed-udev-rules package for Infiniband support Alias: ofed_fedora_10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442917 ------- Additional Comments From shawn.starr at rogers.com 2008-04-23 21:15 EST ------- Keep open, I spoke to someone at Red Hat who deals with IB for RHEL and he mentioned he could provide a .spec/package for Fedora to handle this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 03:59:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240359.m3O3xm89030516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 04:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240412.m3O4CrGn002913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 00:12 EST ------- New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/jna-posix.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/jna-posix-0.5-2.fc8.src.rpm Added README.txt and LICENSE.txt to %doc, rm lib/*.jar in %prep, and keep custom build.xml for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 04:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:14:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240414.m3O4Eeo6000726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 00:14 EST ------- By the way: bytelist's review request is rhbz# 443734 (see "depends" section below). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 04:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240456.m3O4uijm007930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 00:56 EST ------- Well, I wrote up quite a bit of commentary but lost it in a firefox crash. Let me try to get at least something written down here. I built the package from comment 39 and found the following in the build output: warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/lazreport/doc/cvs2cl.pl warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/lazreport/tools/localize.sh Unfortunately it's not possible to just list the two files whose permissions you want to change with %attr specifiers in the %files section, since that means that you can't use a simple glob to include everything below %{_libdir}/%{name}. It's far simpler to just chmod the files in your %install section. rpmlint output was all covered earlier in this ticket and is not problematic. This comment: # Disable the debuginfo packagefor x86_64 # For more info, see fpc-bug 337051 could use a bit of clarification; the ticket is in redhat bugzilla, not fpc's bug tracker. Also, since things have changed there recently, does this package need any changes? It would be nice for the debug package weirdness to go away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 05:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240514.m3O5EPZM013240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-24 01:14 EST ------- Updated package: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/Falcon/Falcon-0.8.8-2.fc9.src.rpm http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/Falcon/Falcon.spec Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=580112 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 05:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240525.m3O5PWij012995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 06:11:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240611.m3O6BPCQ023818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-24 02:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Would you explain what happened? ganyremote.spec is a part of *.tar.gz. So, if i change spec file, then *tar.gz in *src.rpm is changed. I believe nothing more was changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 06:59:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] New: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pyephem/pyephem.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pyephem/pyephem-3.7.2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=580211 Description: PyEphem provides scientific-grade astronomical computations for the Python programming language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 07:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240700.m3O70Lk3032215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |443921 nThis| | Alias| |pyephem-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 07:02:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443797] Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240702.m3O72Xdt030098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: comedilib - Data Acquisition library for the Comedi driver Alias: comedilib-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443797 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |443921 nThis| | Alias| |comedilib-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 07:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240703.m3O73pVO030320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Alias: gnuradio-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-24 03:03 EST ------- Thank you, tracking in Bug 443921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 07:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240701.m3O71s9W029973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim - Simple Instant Messenger Alias: sim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |sim-review ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-24 03:01 EST ------- ping :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 07:13:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240713.m3O7DeBR002022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-24 03:13 EST ------- Well, okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (ganyremote) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 08:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240818.m3O8ILHI015184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-24 04:18 EST ------- I updated to lxsession-lite 0.3.5 and everything is working for me. I will update this review later today, but I'm still struggling with the new lxde-common package, which now contains arch-specific and noarch content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 07:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240758.m3O7wsDJ010135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-24 03:58 EST ------- If xsm is not useful, maybe lxsession-lite should be packaged instead? I tried lxsession-lite, but I couldn't make it work with fluxbox and gdm, though I followed the README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 08:32:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441186] Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240832.m3O8Wl2G017837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freenx-server - Free Software (GPL) Implementation of the NX Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441186 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-04-24 04:32 EST ------- Yes, thanks, all is working now! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 08:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240831.m3O8V4LY017616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-24 04:31 EST ------- In case it can be useful, here is what I did: $ cat /usr/share/xsessions/lxsessionfluxbox.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=lxsession fluxbox Comment=Fluxbox with lxsession Exec=/usr/bin/startlxfluxbox Type=Application $ cat /usr/bin/startlxfluxbox #! /bin/sh exec /usr/bin/lxsession -s fluxbox $ $ ls -1 /etc/xdg/lxsession/ fluxbox Fluxbox lxsession fluxbox all those directory have the same config file in $ ls /etc/xdg/lxsession/* /etc/xdg/lxsession/fluxbox: config /etc/xdg/lxsession/Fluxbox: config /etc/xdg/lxsession/lxsession fluxbox: config $ cat /etc/xdg/lxsession/fluxbox/config [Session] window_manager=startfluxbox It goes as far as starting /usr/bin/lxsession -s fluxbox but fluxbox itself is never started. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 08:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240848.m3O8mApq020612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-24 04:48 EST ------- Re comment 19 I hadn't forgotten about your email, I was just waiting for the collectd Bugzilla component to be created so I could file a bug. Please now see: bug 443942. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 08:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240850.m3O8oc57021299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-24 04:50 EST ------- Well... * pyephem seems to be borrowing libastro codes from XEphem. From: http://rhodesmill.org/pyephem/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can learn more about and download the wonderful XEphem application from which PyEphem derives its computation engine; it has long been written and maintained by Elwood Charles Downey. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I took the diff between xephem-3.7.3/libastro/ in http://www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/xephem-3.7.3.tar.gz and pyephem-3.7.2.3/libastro-3.7.2, and actually the diff is very small (i.e. codes are almost same) * XEphem license is NO for Fedora: http://www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/download.html Would you check if license of libastro part is really okay for Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 09:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804240924.m3O9OqKP024461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 anyremote at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-24 05:24 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ganyremote Short Description: gAnyRemote package is GTK GUI frontend for anyRemote Owners: anyremote Branches: F-8, F-9 InitialCC: anyremote Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 10:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241007.m3OA7HGu032321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-24 06:07 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: archives have no differences when using the decribed steps OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (CentOS-5/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. BAD scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file is installed correctly comments: - mixed usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in %install section - you should remove BR: autoconf automake - files in %{_sysconfdir} should be marked as %config - NetworkManager-pptp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libnm-pptp-properties.so is libnm-pptp-properties a plugin or real library? plugins should have -avoid-version in their LDFLAGS - remove ldconfig calls from the scriptlets (depends on ^) - remove R(post,postun): /sbin/ldconfig - added automagically when ldconfig is used in scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 11:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241151.m3OBpQhh021233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at gmail.com 2008-04-24 07:51 EST ------- Ok, I see the cvs files, koji builds, however I can't find it bodhi. What's up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 12:34:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241234.m3OCYZNw027471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-24 08:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Updated package: > http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/Falcon/Falcon-0.8.8-2.fc9.src.rpm > http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/Falcon/Falcon.spec > > Koji scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=580112 Perfect, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 13:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241300.m3OD0LL7003312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-24 09:00 EST ------- hmm, it seems both the spec and the srpm have disappeared... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 13:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241308.m3OD8eDD002448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From me at bradmwalker.com 2008-04-24 09:08 EST ------- Xavier, the links in comment #12 WFM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 13:14:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241314.m3ODEJ3l003881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-04-24 09:14 EST ------- oh, sorry, I didn't catch the change, the URL from comment #12 works for me too, indeed... Sorry for the noise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 13:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241338.m3ODctBl010860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-24 09:38 EST ------- Hmm, ok. Can you add a comment linking to #442641 above your Source: build.xml then? Otherwise looks good, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 14:02:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241402.m3OE2mXb016677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-24 10:02 EST ------- Hmm, Michel, something is wrong here, this bug is closedm and the bodhi added comments suggest rubberband is in updates, but it isn't both according to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-2954 And in the repo it is still in updates-testing. Can you fix this please (request a push to stable in bodhi). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 14:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241410.m3OEATus019187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 10:10 EST ------- Will do. Can you set fedora_cvs to '+' before I ask for CVS? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 14:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241418.m3OEI6HR021322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 15:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241504.m3OF4uHQ028900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-04-24 11:04 EST ------- I could've sworn I ran bodhi on it for F-8, but then again maybe I forgot. Done now :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 15:01:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241501.m3OF1Ydw028376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-24 11:01 EST ------- According to the recent Java packaging guidelines, jar name should be %{name}.jar ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 15:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241532.m3OFWYGx003185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-24 11:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 15:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241532.m3OFWFer003123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-04-24 11:32 EST ------- All packages have been rebuilt a while back, so closing now. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 15:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241543.m3OFhAnN009170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-04-24 11:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303651) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303651&action=view) Speex 1.2-0.4.beta3 spec file patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 15:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241542.m3OFgHBJ005813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-04-24 11:42 EST ------- Sorry for the long silence. Attached is a quick patch to correct some minor issues. Overall things look good now. The patch : - Changes to use the preferred "make install DESTDIR=" install method - Changes the %files lists to be more consistent (glob vs. non glob + all *.la excludes in the devel package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 16:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241600.m3OG04iv009992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-24 12:00 EST ------- Updated ... Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-4.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 16:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241613.m3OGDZ73012755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-24 12:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 16:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444019] New: Review Request: perl-PHP-Serialization - Converts between PHP's serialize() output and the equivalent Perl structure Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444019 Summary: Review Request: perl-PHP-Serialization - Converts between PHP's serialize() output and the equivalent Perl structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tibbs at math.uh.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/perl-PHP-Serialization/perl-PHP-Serialization.spec SRPM URL: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/perl-PHP-Serialization/perl-PHP-Serialization-0.27-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Provides a simple, quick means of serializing perl memory structures (including object data!) into a format that PHP can deserialize() and access, and vice versa. Builds fine in rawhide, all tests pass and rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 16:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241624.m3OGO15k014937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-24 12:24 EST ------- cvs done. Note that this was a package that was orphaned in the FC6 timeframe. You might want to look at the last spec for any improvements before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 16:27:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241627.m3OGR7qx015882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-24 12:27 EST ------- I think the description here should be just: "GTK GUI frontend for anyRemote". I added it into the package database that way. Let me know if you disagree or would like it changed any. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 16:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442263] Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241654.m3OGsNrF023756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quicksynergy - GUI for easily configuring Synergy2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442263 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 18:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241801.m3OI1v5u009734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 14:01 EST ------- Sorry, I meant fedora_review -- thanks for understanding. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jna-posix Short Description: POSIX APIs for Java Owners: konradm,walters Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 18:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241820.m3OIKehl014221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: PPTP support|Review Request: |for NetworkManager |NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP | |support for NetworkManager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 18:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241825.m3OIPSfj015473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 14:25 EST ------- OK, fixed. New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/bytelist.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/bytelist-0.1-0.2.svn6558.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 18:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241841.m3OIf5hn015061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-24 14:41 EST ------- Okay. This is a very small package (only 3 files are in tarball) and - follow packaging guidelines (especially Java), srpm okay - build on dist-f9 - can be installed -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (bytelist) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 18:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241856.m3OIupDX023327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 14:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bytelist Short Description: A java library for lists of bytes Owners: konradm Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241904.m3OJ4aAA025081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-24 15:04 EST ------- Quick thing - can we add %check ant test -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:08:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241908.m3OJ8GGn023651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-24 15:08 EST ------- Could use a: %check ant test Other than that, looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241917.m3OJHvJB028437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-24 15:17 EST ------- I know about XEphem license, but this does not apply on libastro, quote from COPYING (about libastro): "You can redistribute and/or modify both works, as distributed in this package, under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 3..." Same case with libpng, it's shipped as par of Xephem, but xephem is not the upstream. mailed upstream to get their opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443741] Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241922.m3OJMVWu026938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jna-posix - POSIX APIs for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443741 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 15:22 EST ------- CVS done. (I created an F-9 branch as well.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241922.m3OJMCV3026881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 15:22 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241923.m3OJNGlG027028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 15:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jvyamlb Short Description: YAML processor for JRuby Owners: konradm Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:25:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241925.m3OJPdvs027884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 15:25 EST ------- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241927.m3OJRTv2030540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 ------- Additional Comments From richardfearn at gmail.com 2008-04-24 15:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > @Richard > Are you still here ? Yes, I am! I was on holiday last weekend so since getting feedback (thanks to Josh, Michael and yourself) I haven't had a chance to work on the package. I'm looking at the EWF support now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241951.m3OJpTtr004696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-24 15:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303682) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303682&action=view) mail from upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 19:54:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804241954.m3OJsx0g005023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 20:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242008.m3OK8or4008134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-24 16:08 EST ------- 0.) The use of env is kind of useless here. env CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" python setup.py build env CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" python setup.py install --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT 1.) Requires: python This is useless as well. The dependency on python has to be versioned, as the file names are versioned, and I believe the correct one is automatically generated anyways. 2.) rpmlint outputs these: pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_usno.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_dates.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_usno_equinoxes.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/ephem_test.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_bodies.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_rst.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_angles.py 0644 pyephem.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/ephem/tests/test_constants.py 0644 Do you believe those should realy be installed? What making them executable and utilizing the %test section then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 20:52:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242052.m3OKqKnm017103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 Bug 302271 depends on bug 302261, which changed state. Bug 302261 Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 20:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242052.m3OKqJLr017082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-24 16:52 EST ------- ship css_simple, built on F-7,8,9 and rawhide, pushed to bodhi for F-7 and F-8. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 20:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242055.m3OKtwkg014434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-24 16:55 EST ------- Lubomir, thank you, you're right. All issues resolved in current version of spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 20:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242059.m3OKxWKt018737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 20:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242059.m3OKx876014807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-24 16:59 EST ------- Now this was fast. Not seeing anything that would violate the guidelines -- APPROVED And thank you for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242101.m3OL1IZj015635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-24 17:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyephem Short Description: The astronomy library for Python Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8, F-9 (does this exist yet?), EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242105.m3OL5Jw2016937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242106.m3OL6AYa020903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242107.m3OL7KaM021014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-24 17:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks for the review. > comments: > - mixed usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in %install section Fixed. > - you should remove BR: autoconf automake Fixed. > - files in %{_sysconfdir} should be marked as %config These are not really configuration files. At least not user-adjustable. > - NetworkManager-pptp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/libnm-pptp-properties.so > is libnm-pptp-properties a plugin or real library? plugins should have > -avoid-version in their LDFLAGS Right. Patched that out. > - remove ldconfig calls from the scriptlets (depends on ^) Done. > - remove R(post,postun): /sbin/ldconfig - added automagically when ldconfig is > used in scriptlets Done. http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/NetworkManager-pptp.spec http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/NetworkManager-pptp-0.6.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:29:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:29:14 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242129.m3OLTEU6021977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-24 17:29 EST ------- The separate .spec file content doesn't match the SRPM again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:34:08 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_438105=5D_Review_Request=3A_libconcord_-_L?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ibrary_to_talk_to_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_univ?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ersal_remote_controls?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242134.m3OLY88A022904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech? Harmony? universal remote controls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-04-24 17:34 EST ------- Also, I assume you want to add the "--install-purelib %{python_sitearch}" to the Python install command so 32/64 bit packages don't conflict, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242137.m3OLbmOZ023642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-24 17:37 EST ------- rm -f src/org/jruby/util/SunSignalFacade.java This interface is just specific to OpenJDK, right? Since most of the community seems to be coalescing around OpenJDK I don't think we need to remove this. Long term having OpenJDK and GCJ share a class library through a classpath/OpenJDK/GCJ merger would fix this too. As for the powerpc build; I think we don't need to block getting JRuby in on that, the process looks like you add the ExcludeArch on ppc, then file a bug that blocks #121179. By the way we should get this reported upstream; I believe the author of that interpreter code in OpenJDK is gbenson at redhat.com. But regardless of choices on those, I think we're good to go; marking as approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:39:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242139.m3OLdcks023852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 17:39 EST ------- I wanted to spend some time taking care of some of these old tickets but now I can't get this to build (in rawhide) at all; the build fails with: Using /bin/bash to process command scripts. Missing C++ runtime support for g++ (/usr/lib64/ccache/g++). Compilation of the following test program failed: ---------------------------------------------------------- #include "iostream.h" int main(){ cout << "Hello World!" << endl; return 0;} ---------------------------------------------------------- Usually this is because you do not have a standard C++ library installed on your system or you have installed it in a non-standard location. If you do not have a C++ library installed, then you must install it. If it is installed in a non-standard location, then you should configure the compiler so that it will automatically be found. (For recent gcc releases this is libstdc++, for older gcc - libg++) Unrecoverable error! Once you've corrected the problem rerun this script. libstdc++-devel is installed, so it's not something as simple as that. Perhaps there's a gcc 4.3 incompatibility? I don't know much at all about C++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242141.m3OLff1g028278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 17:41 EST ------- Well, it's been far longer than seven days. Still interested? Otherwise I guess I'll close this again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441415] Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242147.m3OLlWMx025518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wastesedge - Official game package for Adonthell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441415 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-24 17:47 EST ------- I've been told in bug 441411 that the web host I'm using is making things difficult for people to dwonload the files. Here they are, more easily accessible. SPEC: http://fedora.c-bien.fr/wastesedge.spec SRPM: http://fedora.c-bien.fr/wastesedge-0.3.4-0.5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242146.m3OLk27Z028988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-24 17:46 EST ------- I finally found someone to host the files (thanks go to TeeWee). Here they are, more easily accessible :) SPEC: http://fedora.c-bien.fr/adonthell.spec SRPM: http://fedora.c-bien.fr/adonthell-0.3.4-0.7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242149.m3OLn3xH025689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2008-04-24 17:49 EST ------- It builds perfectly fine on Fedora 8 (which uses gcc 4.1.2). Is gcc 4.3 only available in rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242155.m3OLtY8f030566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-24 17:55 EST ------- I made all the chages and I do have another package wating for review, and I even made some changes on it for myself based on the points you posted here. It is a 3d game using SDL, it does have a questionable item in it, there is a non-free (freely distributed for non-comercial uses) font, I removed it from the final package but since the sources used must be the same as the upstream the font file gets to be distributed with the source rpm, not sure if this is a problem. The bug number for the review is #443238. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242156.m3OLulo4027301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-24 17:56 EST ------- the latest spec and src rpm are bellow : http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid-0.6.00-5.bog9.src.rpm http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 21:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242158.m3OLwwoC031004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 17:58 EST ------- Well, it's in Fedora 9 which isn't terribly far away now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 22:08:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242208.m3OM8rlo000699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-24 18:08 EST ------- BTW, here's the end of the config.log file. Perhaps it will be instructive: ++ cat dummy.C #include "new.h" struct foo { int x; foo(); ~foo(); }; foo::foo() {} foo::~foo() {} int main() { foo* ptr = 0; foo* a = new(ptr) foo; a->x = 0; delete a; return 0; } ++ /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -o dummy dummy.C dummy.C:1:17: error: new.h: No such file or directory dummy.C: In function 'int main()': dummy.C:12: error: no matching function for call to 'operator new(long unsigned int, foo*&)' :0: note: candidates are: void* operator new(long unsigned int) ++ /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -o dummy dummy.C -lg++ dummy.C:1:17: error: new.h: No such file or directory dummy.C: In function 'int main()': dummy.C:12: error: no matching function for call to 'operator new(long unsigned int, foo*&)' :0: note: candidates are: void* operator new(long unsigned int) ++ make -f confMakefile t /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -D__ANSI_CPP__ -I. -I. -I././regex -I. -I././util -I/usr/include -g -O t.c++ t.c++:1:22: error: iostream.h: No such file or directory t.c++: In function 'int main()': t.c++:2: error: 'cout' was not declared in this scope t.c++:2: error: 'endl' was not declared in this scope make: *** [t] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 22:25:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242225.m3OMPC02003760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 18:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jruby Short Description: Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter Owners: konradm Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes (In reply to comment #44) > rm -f src/org/jruby/util/SunSignalFacade.java > > This interface is just specific to OpenJDK, right? Since most of the > community seems to be coalescing around OpenJDK I don't think we need to > remove this. Long term having OpenJDK and GCJ share a class library through a > classpath/OpenJDK/GCJ merger would fix this too. I guess so. It builds fine with the file left in under OpenJDK here. Thanks for the review, Colin and Mamoru! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 22:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444094] New: Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444094 Summary: Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bochecha at no-log.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.c-bien.fr/fedora-legacy-backgrounds.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.c-bien.fr/fedora-legacy-backgrounds-9.0-0.1.src.rpm Description: The fedora-legacy-backgrounds package contains artwork intended to be used as desktop wallpapers that were created for older releases of Fedora and Fedora Core. ---- I was feeling a bit nostalgic after installing Fedora 9 preview and wanted to install the Infinity wallpaper (really loved this one). And then I thought a package with all previous wallpapers would be great :) Some remarks: 1. This is not my first submission, but the two I made previously are not yet accepted. So this is like if it was my first submission. 2. I couldn't find the background for FC1. Someone told me (but wasn't sure) that it was a solid black background. Is that true? If yes, I won't need to add it to the package. 3. The backgrounds for FC2 and FC3 look *really* similar. Were they the same? (I started using Fedora with the FC5, so I don't know older releases). If yes, I'll take one of the two out of the package. 4. I could find more than one background (default, wide, etc...) for some release, but not for others. Is there a place where I could find them? (like somewhere on the Artwork Team page) 5. I named the backgrounds with the name of the theme FC5 to F8 (Bubbles, DNA, Flying High and Infinity, correct me if I'm wrong on one of them) but I couldn't find the names of the themes for earlier releases, so I named them with the name of the release (Tettnang, Heidelberg and Stentz). I think it would be better to be more consistent, does anybody know the name of the earlier themes? 6. I used 9.0 for %{version} as the package is made for Fedora 9 (might conflict with already installed themes for earlier releases). I thought it would be a good idea to have the %{version} follow the version of Fedora. Should I change that? 7. Finally, rpmlint complains because there is no documentation. I saw that the package desktop-backgrounds-basic from the F8 repositories do not have documentation either, so I didn't bother with it. Should I? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 22:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242259.m3OMxiot006002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From nmiell at comcast.net 2008-04-24 18:59 EST ------- gcc 4.3 dropped the pre-ISO backwards compatibility headers. Fortunately, the only thing that appears to actually needs those headers is the configure script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 23:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242346.m3ONkWso017616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 ------- Additional Comments From stlwrt at gmail.com 2008-04-24 19:46 EST ------- Thanks to everyone, koji just finished building packages ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 23:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441965] Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242347.m3ONlSR8017715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Apr 24 23:47:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804242347.m3ONlTb7017747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 Bug 442276 depends on bug 441965, which changed state. Bug 441965 Summary: Review Request: eet - Library for speedy data storage, retrieval, and compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441965 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442462] Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250013.m3P0DTrj018864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e_dbus - Wrappers around dbus for EFL based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442462 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442266] Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250012.m3P0CHA0018707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: embryo - Easy to use library for running compiled PAWN programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442266 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:12:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250012.m3P0COKT018750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:13:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442808] Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250013.m3P0DbRA018911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epsilon - Small, display independent, and quick thumbnailing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442808 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442404] Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250012.m3P0Cguo018800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efreet - An implementation of several specifications from freedesktop.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442404 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442353] Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250012.m3P0CYNK022390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecore - Event/X abstraction layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442353 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442640] Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250013.m3P0DYv3022515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epeg - Immensely fast JPEG thumbnailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442640 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442437] Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250012.m3P0CoQn022440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edje - A graphical layout and animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442437 stlwrt at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443734] Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250038.m3P0cnKC023240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 konrad at tylerc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-04-24 20:38 EST ------- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443750] Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250038.m3P0cn2U023260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jvyamlb - YAML processor for JRuby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443750 Bug 443750 depends on bug 443734, which changed state. Bug 443734 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250038.m3P0co5d023285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 Bug 417511 depends on bug 443734, which changed state. Bug 443734 Summary: Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443734 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 00:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444094] Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250037.m3P0bVva023121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444094 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-04-24 20:37 EST ------- I'm sorry to say that this package isn't acceptable as-is. All instances of the Fedora logo (both the stylized F, and the text) must only appear in the fedora-logos package. This is for trademark reasons (and allows others to easily rebrand their derivative distribution, if they so desire.) As such, the DNA & FlyingHigh backgrounds can't be shipped as they are here. If the logos are removed (admittedly problematic for the DNA backgrounds), then it's OK - feel free to reopen this in that case. Yes, this is one reason why the later artwork doesn't have the logo in it. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 01:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250157.m3P1v6NR006565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-24 21:57 EST ------- cvs done. (yes, F-9 is available now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 01:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250154.m3P1sQtO005792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-24 21:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 02:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431335] Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250209.m3P29CYK012584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431335 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-04-24 22:09 EST ------- This review is stalled. If there is no response from John Mahowald within a week, I will remove the FE-REVIEW blocker and replace it with FE-NEW. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 02:19:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436716] Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250219.m3P2JkBN011976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tinyproxy - A small, efficient HTTP/SSL proxy daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436716 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-24 22:19 EST ------- tinyproxy-1.6.3-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 02:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250237.m3P2bGDG017265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-04-24 22:37 EST ------- Oops. It slipped my mind. I am still interested. Will file a new bug and close this one as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 03:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444113] New: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444113 Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-valgrind-session.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-valgrind-session-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNOME Valgrind Session adds new types of GNOME session to the login manager's session menu. These let you instrument your entire session with Valgrind for debugging purposes. The generated logs are collected and subjected to simple postprocessing when you log out. The result is saved to a file in your home directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 03:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444113] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250324.m3P3O75f029862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444113 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmalcolm at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-04-24 23:24 EST ------- *** Bug 216517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 03:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 216517] Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250324.m3P3O63f029820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-valgrind-session - Run an entire GNOME session under valgrind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216517 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-04-24 23:24 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444113 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 04:31:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250431.m3P4VeIc016492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-04-25 00:31 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303735) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303735&action=view) hack let hylafax's configure succeed with gcc-4.3.0 Try this patch. It hacks hylafax's configure to use iostream instead of iostream.h and to let this configure script succeed. But ... blunt question: Does hylafax still have an active upstream? Checking the details of this configure script, I found this configure script to be hardly working at all and to produce questionable/broken results in detail. It's mere luck this package builds at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 04:43:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250443.m3P4hK0g018892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2008-04-25 00:43 EST ------- Yes, hello (?), an active upstream is here. http://hylafax.sourceforge.net As for the details of this failing on gcc-4.3, admittedly there's not likely been anyone attempt to build HylaFAX with it until now. As for other parts of the configure script that may be hardly working at all, etc., please do elaborate, and I'll see what I can do about getting them working better. That said, it builds just fine on every platform out there that I've tested it on, and I'm pretty sure that's more than mere luck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 05:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250514.m3P5E2Qv025286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-04-25 01:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #75) > As for the details of this failing on gcc-4.3, admittedly there's not likely > been anyone attempt to build HylaFAX with it until now. That's apparent :) > As for other parts of the configure script that may be hardly working at all, > etc., please do elaborate, and I'll see what I can do about getting them > working better. Openly said, if I were upstream, I would ditch this configure script and its Makefile.ins underneath and replace with something more standardized. My personal choice would be the autotools. > That said, it builds just fine on every platform out there that I've tested it > on, and I'm pretty sure that's more than mere luck. Some details from my build.log: 1. ... Looks like /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc supports the -g option. ... but not together with the -O option, not using it. This result is plain wrong - The test trying to check for -O -g must have failed. 2. configure script doesn't acknowledge CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS. 3. Checking for PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) support ... not found. Disabling PAM support This could be a packaging bug inside of the rpm.spec - I don't know. 4. ... Checking ZLIB support. Using ZLIB include files from Using pre-built ZLIB library -lz Done checking ZLIB support. ... No idea what this is meant to mean. Could be a parallel build issue, a configure script failure or else ... 5. ... Checking JBIG-in-TIFF conversion support. ./configure: line 3274: 28995 Segmentation fault $TIFFBIN/tiffcp -c g4 misc/jbig.tif misc/foo.tif > /dev/null 2>&1 JBIG-in-TIFF conversion support not found. ... ?!? Likely a broken check in configure. 6. -I/usr/include in compiler calls: ... /usr/lib64/ccache/gcc -D__ANSI_CPP__ -I. -I.. -I.././regex -I.././regex -I.././util -I/usr/include -fpic -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector ... Though it doesn't have an impact in most cases, this is quite a serious bug, because it impacts include file search order. 7. uid/gid processing: + make install -e FAXUSER=8690 FAXGROUP=492 SYSUSER=8690 SYSGROUP=492 BIN=/var/tmp/hylafax-5.2.2-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/bin SBIN=/var/tmp/hylafax-5.2.2-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/sbin LIBD /bin/bash ./port/install.sh -u 8690 -g 492 -m 755 ... This is all wrong ... the uid/gids you see above are my personal ones! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 05:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250540.m3P5ee7S027555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-25 01:40 EST ------- It took me way too long to get back to this. A couple of rpmlint complaints which were not mentioned earlier: kaya.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: kaya-0.2.7-make.patch This file can probably be removed now, although see below. kaya.src: W: strange-permission kaya-0.4.0-64bit-part2.patch 0775 kaya.src: W: strange-permission kaya-0.4.0-64bit-part1.patch 0775 Not sure why these are executable. They probably shouldn't be, but I don't think it makes much difference. Since the -make.patch isn't being applied, -g isn't getting passed, which neuters the debuginfo package again. But of course it doesn't apply at all currently. Really, I'm not sure what the point of having a functional debuginfo package would be; I guess you could debug the portions of the compiler or libraries which are written in C++, but of course it wouldn't help you with the parts written in Haskell or Kaya itself. Maybe it should just be disabled. Either way, there's no point in having it in the current state. Ran out of time tonight; more tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 05:55:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443926] Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250555.m3P5tvJh030033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyephem - The astronomy library for Python Alias: pyephem-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443926 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-04-25 01:55 EST ------- Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 07:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250752.m3P7q0LM020743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 03:51 EST ------- James, you should close the review bug as it was already built in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 07:51:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250751.m3P7p2Tr020474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 03:51 EST ------- All issues resolved or explained, so package is APPROVED. I have created a bug with a patch in b.g.o to solve the "-avoid-version" problem in upstream (#529836) for all the vpn plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 08:17:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250817.m3P8HKAh023284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-25 04:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: NetworkManager-pptp Short Description: PPTP support for NetworkManager Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 (Is devel mandatory? This won't ever make it to Fedora, it is named differently for newer NetworkManager versions) Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 08:17:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250817.m3P8HgB9026692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 08:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444094] Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250837.m3P8bdmO030374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444094 ------- Additional Comments From bochecha at no-log.org 2008-04-25 04:37 EST ------- I'd like to understand what the problem is... > "This is for trademark reasons" But the trademark applies to the fedora-logos package too right? So what's the problem with this specific package? > "(and allows others to easily rebrand their derivative distribution, if they so desire.)" If others want to rebrand their derivative distribution, they will have to exclude the fedora-logos package. Why couldn't they also exclude this one? I'm totally ready to give that package to someone at Red Hat if that can help (as Red Hat is the logos and trademark owner, not sure it can make any difference though), but I think it would be great to have all those nice pieces of artwork as they represent Fedora's history. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 09:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804250959.m3P9xSe4012124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-04-25 05:59 EST ------- I've fixed the files-entries and removed the debuginfo-hack, but now it won't build in mock, because it still uses the 'old' fpc-fc8 packages. So I'll have to find out if the new packages will get into fc9 automatically, or that I have to do something to achieve that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251023.m3PANZeQ013529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- - |summary here> ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr 2008-04-25 06:23 EST ------- !BPY It tells Blender that this is a Blender script, and therefore it will consider it when scanning for scripts. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Blender_3D:_Noob_to_Pro/Advanced_Tutorials/Python_Scripting/Export_scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://download.berlios.de/python/spe.spec SRPM URL: http://download.berlios.de/python/spe-0.8.4.h-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: SPE it is a Python IDE editor released rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/spe-0.8.4.h-1.fc8.noarch.rpm spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/Blender_signature.py "BPY" spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/spe_blender.py "BPY" spe.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/spe/_spe/winpdb_blender.py "BPY" rpmlint does not recognize shebang #!BPY This shebang makes it possible Blender to recognize script as a plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240557] Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251032.m3PAWI8J017962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-findlib - Objective CAML package manager and build helper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240557 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 06:32 EST ------- Built in EL-4: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-4-epel/38837-ocaml-findlib-1.2.1-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251042.m3PAguNW017110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:41:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251041.m3PAfK9l020026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-04-25 06:41 EST ------- Thanks, I've overlooked these things. You can check it in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:46:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443195] Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251046.m3PAk0rk017848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pAgenda -A cross platform calendar and scheduler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443195 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-25 06:46 EST ------- pAgenda-3.2-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 10:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251053.m3PAr6d4021965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 11:05:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251105.m3PB5lw6024679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-04-25 07:05 EST ------- OK, one last minor thing : The %{_defaultdocdir}/speex line isn't needed. I see this was supposed to fix bug #439284 but I think it's wrong as the /usr/share/doc/speex directory isn't included in the package. Also, you should escape the macro in the %changelog by putting %%{_defaultdocdir}/speex so that it doesn't get expanded to the value in there. The rest looks all good, modulo some weird (yet very minor) tabs and spaces mixing inside the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 11:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251115.m3PBFcd0023465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 11:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251116.m3PBGMhT026600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 11:16:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251116.m3PBGRlG026632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 12:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251237.m3PCbcPa006392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 08:37 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: e78c9d8858749f5e234cba303637980e24085cbc omake-0.9.8.5-3.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/X86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint output can be ignored. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. notes - remove the exec bit from the patch this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 12:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251255.m3PCtmBX010080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 13:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251306.m3PD6bg9012578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 09:06 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: 819d2f95f44cc4c331a4aa644f8d23704477de05 ocamlgsl-0.6.0.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets are present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. notes - typo on %description - langage => language - mixed usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in %install (info files) - BR: gsl >= 1.9 should be removed as it will brought by gsl-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 13:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251342.m3PDg0HZ023868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-25 09:41 EST ------- Can't download sources from your main site w/o registration. It's no go for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 13:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251344.m3PDil9J024191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-25 09:44 EST ------- Hey, thanks for picking this up, it was on my list of things to look at... Some preliminary comments on the spec file: This looks wrong, only devel packages should require devel packages: Requires: gtk2-devel These will almost certainly be pulled in automatically be library dependencies, so no need to list them explicitly: Requires: glib2 Requires: libxml2 Requires: GConf2 The devel package must require pkgconfig, since it contains a pc file. The description is misleading, since the devel package should _not_ contain static libraries. It should contain the unversioned symlinks (.so) for shared libraries. Running autogen.sh should only be necessary when building from a checkout. Even if this package is based on a git snapshot right now, the tarball should be produced by 'make dist' and the autogen.sh call should be unnecessary. If it were necessary for some reason, then you are missing the necessary BuildRequires for automake, autoconf, etc missing from the file list: %dir %{_datadir}/geoclue-providers %dir %{_includedir}/geoclue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 13:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443675] Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251354.m3PDs0CJ022493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sip-redirect - Tiny IPv4 and IPv6 SIP redirect server written in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443675 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-04-25 09:53 EST ------- Peter, that's a thing which can be changed. If changed, will it switch to a "yes go"? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 13:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443588] Review Request: fig2sxd - fig to sxd converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251357.m3PDvpfR027367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fig2sxd - fig to sxd converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443588 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-04-25 09:57 EST ------- Package doesn't build: * Missing deps: ... In file included from zipwrite.cpp:21 : zipwrite.h:29:18: error: zlib.h: No such file or directory ... Likely a missing dep on zlib-devel. * Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS: .... g++ -Wall -W -O2 -g -o fig2sxd.o -c fig2sxd.cpp g++ -Wall -W -O2 -g -o xfig_arc.o -c xfig_arc.cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251404.m3PE4HXt024686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-25 10:04 EST ------- As expected, trying to build your srpm in mock fails with which: no libtoolize in (/usr/lib/ccache:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin:/builddir/bin) libtoolize not found. Please install it. due to the missing BuildRequires for the autogen.sh call -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442705] Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251415.m3PEFT1x027307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-bitmatch - OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442705 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 10:15 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bitmatch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bitmatch-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm New upstream version (0.5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251434.m3PEY4GH001572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(dan at danny.cz) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251433.m3PEXVbL001484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 10:33 EST ------- - rpmlint output openhpi-subagent.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/openhpi-subagent openhpi-subagent.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/openhpi-subagent openhpi-subagent.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/openhpi-subagent openhpi-subagent.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/openhpi-subagent Apparently init scripts shouldn't be marked as %config, so just remove that annotation. If the init script is intended to be edited, then you should create a config file under /etc/sysconfig and have the init file source that config file. The service should be disabled by default. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#head-c074b6a78b42c4c797d978750719ebcf262b4e61 + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock (but koji build, so no need) + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane but see above n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ---------- The only issues are those problems found by rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251441.m3PEf86O032195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 10:41 EST ------- + rpmlint output no output ? package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines I'm dubious about naming the package 'py-openhpi' even though strictly speaking this doesn't violate any Python guideline. I would rename it python-openhpi instead just for consistency with other Python packages in Fedora. + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun n/a does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available - reviewer should build the package in mock (but ok coz built in koji) + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel n/a shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin =============== APPROVED However please consider renaming the package to python-openhpi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] New: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/sugar-journal.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/sugar-journal-79-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Journal activity for sugar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:44:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251444.m3PEiUV5003876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 10:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-omake Short Description: OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251449.m3PEnWD0004987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 10:49 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-gsl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-gsl-0.6.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Fri Apr 25 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.6.0-3 - Fixed typo in description. - Mixed use of buildroot macro / RPM_BUILD_ROOT variable fixed. - Remove BR gsl (brought in by gsl-devel, so unnecessary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 14:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251455.m3PEt9ml002391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251505.m3PF5W5V004678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-25 11:05 EST ------- Well, F9 is frozen now. If you have something that you think really needs to get into the F9 release, you can contact rel-eng at fedoraproject.org and ask that your build be tagged. Otherwise it will go out as an update once F9 is released. Rawhide doesn't start moving again for another week or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:15:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251515.m3PFFt67006571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-25 11:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251514.m3PFEcaj005993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-25 11:14 EST ------- yes, devel is required. You can just dead.package the devel branch explaining that this is a EL-5 only package? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251521.m3PFLK9a007776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-25 11:21 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, switching from a minimal F8 to something in which gnome works was a PIA. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:hamster-applet.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/hamster-applet.schemas => acceptable, per comment #5 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv3+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package:886bc42157cb21fa4f9a5bc6ec50c3b489438e94 hamster-applet-0.1.7.4.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. => it is an applet, so it is a GUI but should not be launched via a desktop file [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: all archs supported by koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:F8/i386 [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:38:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251538.m3PFcaQt014431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-25 11:38 EST ------- I will review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251545.m3PFjvus013034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-25 11:45 EST ------- Almost okay. For 0.6.00-5: * Directory permission issue - rpmlint shows: ---------------------------------------------------------- cwiid-wminput.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/cwiid 0644 cwiid-wminput.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/cwiid/wminput 0644 ---------------------------------------------------------- These directories should have 0755 permission. When you write ---------------------------------------------------------- 97 %files wminput 98 %config(noreplace) %attr(0644,root,root) %{_sysconfdir}/cwiid ---------------------------------------------------------- this actually sets all permissions of files/directories/etc under %_sysconfdir/cwiid ant itself to 0644. To avoid this, I recommend to write just: ---------------------------------------------------------- %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/cwiid/ ---------------------------------------------------------- (I usually add slash to the end intentionally if it is a directory) and change the permissions beforehand at %install like: ---------------------------------------------------------- find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} -type d -exec chmod 0644 {} ';' ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444165] Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251549.m3PFnStH016304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkrdns - automatic reverse DNS zone generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 jonathansteffan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |generator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444165] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444165 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathansteffan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mkrdns.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mkrdns-3.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: An automatic reverse DNS zone generator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251554.m3PFsoIg017349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dan at danny.cz) | ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 11:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/openhpi-subagent.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/openhpi-subagent-2.3.4-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Apr 25 2008 Dan Horak - 2.3.4-2 - initscript is not a config file - added missing R(postun) - update the initd script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 15:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251556.m3PFuxc5018045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-25 11:56 EST ------- I just uploaded what I hope may become synopsis 0.11, as srpm: http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/synopsis-0.11-1.fc8.src.rpm Please note that this is not an official release yet, as I'd rather like to incorporate any changes you may suggest in order to make this acceptable for inclusion into Fedora. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251608.m3PG8d2Q017619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 12:08 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303796) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303796&action=view) updated spec OK, I made a few changes: - Since the locale files aren't in /usr/share/locale, you can't use find_lang to pick up the mo files, you're going to have to manually split them out. This will make the %files section a bit more complex for sugar packages, you might consider making a modified find_lang script that finds these and generates a proper file list (%find_sugar_lang). - I set chmod +x on setup.py (not sure why that gets installed, but whatever) to silence rpmlint - You don't need to double package NEWS, the installer puts it in the activity directory, so just mark it as %%doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251609.m3PG9EiC020455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 12:09 EST ------- If that spec looks ok to you, let me know, and I'll finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251609.m3PG9kZI017848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:09:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251609.m3PG9SgE017810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:09:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251609.m3PG902H017757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 12:08 EST ------- The package name was a question for me too. So I will rename it and when somebody will require the upstream name, it can be easily added as Provides. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251612.m3PGCIJY021233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: py-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 12:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-openhpi Short Description: Python interface for OpenHPI Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251618.m3PGIpFZ019821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-25 12:18 EST ------- Hi Jaroslav, Yep, it looks like your account is active. Now you can set the "fedora-cvs?" flag in this bugzilla entry, and that will request a module to be created in CVS. By the way, you should also get a F-9 branch now (add F-9 to the Branches: list). After that's done, you'll have a CVS module from which you can import your SRPM and then start making a build. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-d6a6db5509ce8ac73b4a8306e59aa2eaaa6f30dc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251618.m3PGIoLR022213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 12:18 EST ------- all issues fixed, so this package is APPROVED now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251621.m3PGLlRS023002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: py-openhpi -|Review Request: python- |Python interface for OpenHPI|openhpi - Python interface | |for OpenHPI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251637.m3PGbGF8026083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-04-25 12:37 EST ------- Thanks Dan, I completely forgot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251643.m3PGh0u4024711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-25 12:42 EST ------- Spec looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:44:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251644.m3PGiUOW027502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-25 12:44 EST ------- builds fine in mock rpmlint is quiet spec is clean source matches upstream sha1sum pyke-0.2.tar.gz SOURCES/pyke-0.2.tar.gz 6ef06efb2696cca82b85d8dc1951bcb0be169ee4 pyke-0.2.tar.gz 6ef06efb2696cca82b85d8dc1951bcb0be169ee4 SOURCES/pyke-0.2.tar.gz Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 16:58:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251658.m3PGwWZK027288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 17:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251717.m3PHHm0C031142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 13:17 EST ------- Yes, that looks fine. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 17:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251721.m3PHL9KT032042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 13:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-gsl Short Description: Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 17:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251743.m3PHhw94003608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-25 13:43 EST ------- should it be: ------------------------------------------------------------------ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} -type d -exec chmod 0755 {} ';' ------------------------------------------------------------------ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 17:46:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443897] Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251746.m3PHkCr8004232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-omake - OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443897 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 13:46 EST ------- Building for all 5 branches now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 17:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251755.m3PHtFx3008731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-25 13:55 EST ------- It is ---------------------------------------------------------- find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} -type f -exec chmod 0644 {} ';' ---------------------------------------------------------- ... sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251800.m3PI02uc009623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-25 14:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openhpi-subagent Short Description: SNMP subagent for OpenHPI Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251805.m3PI5VmM010901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 14:05 EST ------- Review ========= Good: - rpmlint checks return: * sugar-journal.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities * sugar-journal.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities * sugar-journal.src: W: strange-permission sugar-journal-checkout.sh 0775 All safe to ignore. - package meets Sugar naming guidelines - package meets Sugar packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+) OK, copy of license not in source, matches source code - spec file legible, in am. english - source generated with included script - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED (please make sure the new sugar-toolkit package is tagged and in the repodata before rebuilding) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441411] Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251806.m3PI6X8n011160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adonthell - A 2D graphical RPG game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-25 14:06 EST ------- Some comments: * As far as I checked the tarball, the license tag should be "GPLv2+". * The explicit Requires: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Requires: SDL Requires: python Requires: zlib Requires: freetype Requires: SDL_mixer ------------------------------------------------------------------ should all be removed. These library related Reqires are automatically checked and added to binary rpms by rpmbuild itself. * Fedora specific compilation flags (you can check this by $ rpm --eval %optflags) are not correctly honored: the section "Compiler flags" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * Please check directory ownership issue ------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/adonthell/modules/adonthell.pyc adonthell-0.3.4-0.7.fc9.i386 [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/adonthell file /usr/share/adonthell is not owned by any package [root at localhost ~]# LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/adonthell/modules/ file /usr/share/adonthell/modules is not owned by any package ------------------------------------------------------------------ Note: When you write ------------------------------------------------------------------ %files %{_datadir}/%{name}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ This contains the directory %_datadir/%name itself and all files/directories/etc under the directory, while ------------------------------------------------------------------ %files %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} ------------------------------------------------------------------ contains the directory %{_datadir}/%name only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251834.m3PIYgxr015684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-25 14:34 EST ------- There alteration made. New specs and rpms : http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid.spec http://bogado.net/rpm/cwiid-0.6.00-6.bog8.src.rpm I ran rpmlint against the newly made rpm as that : $ rpmlint /home/bogado/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cwiid-* cwiid.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.00-6 0.6.00-6.bog8 cwiid-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation cwiid-python2.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251854.m3PIsHU9019426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 14:54 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251855.m3PItFBg019867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 14:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyke Short Description: Knowledge-based inference engine Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251854.m3PIsDOx016362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 14:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:57:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251857.m3PIvuka017122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 14:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 18:54:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251854.m3PIsFXJ016397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 14:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 19:08:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435983] Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251908.m3PJ8ZDv019201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gsl - Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435983 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 15:08 EST ------- Building for all 5 branches now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 19:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251919.m3PJJ8Us024569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-25 15:19 EST ------- [Note: This is to support ocaml-gsl, requested for EPEL-4, see bug 435983] Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gsl New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 19:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251920.m3PJKEgi022025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 19:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437659] Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804251950.m3PJo5eW031374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyke - Knowledge-based inference engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437659 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 15:50 EST ------- ... and it is built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252001.m3PK1Fk7030575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-04-25 16:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hamster-applet Short Description: Time tracking applet Owners: maxx Branches: F-9 InitialCC: maxx Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:22:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442787] Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252022.m3PKMv9t002359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hamster-applet - Time tracking applet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442787 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 16:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440697] Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252034.m3PKYamD007388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AcetoneISO2 - CD/DVD Image Manipulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440697 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 16:34 EST ------- In rawhide, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:34:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] New: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SAASound.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/SAASound-3.2-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252037.m3PKb2jj005100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |444223, 444224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252037.m3PKb3wj005142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |444225 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:37:02 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_444224=5D_Review_Request=3A_samcoupe-rom_-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_SAM_Coup=C3=A9_=28Spectrum_compatible_homecomputer?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=29_ROM_file?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252037.m3PKb23K005121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |444225 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:35:05 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_444224=5D_New=3A_Review_Request=3A_samcoup?= =?iso-8859-1?q?e-rom_-_SAM_Coup=C3=A9_=28Spectrum_compatible_homec?= =?iso-8859-1?q?omputer=29_ROM_file?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/samcoupe-rom.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/samcoupe-rom-3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file, for use with the simcoupe SAM Coup? emulator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] New: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/simcoupe.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/simcoupe-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: SimCoupe emulates an 8bit Z80 based home computer, released in 1989 by Miles Gordon Technology. The SAM Coupe was largely spectrum compatible, with much improved hardware Note this package Requires SAASound and samcoupe-rom, both of which are still under review, see bug 444223 and bug 444224. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:39:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252039.m3PKd7Yc005412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-25 16:39 EST ------- Script is fine, sorry it took so long. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:45:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252045.m3PKjGNY006851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-25 16:45 EST ------- I tried to run build ... but something goes wrong (seems i made "make tag" several times) Now i got: ---------------------------------------------- make tag cvs tag -c ganyremote-2_8-2_fc10 ERROR: Tag ganyremote-2_8-2_fc10 has been already created. The following tags have been created so far ganyremote-2_8-1_fc10:devel:anyremote:1209152554 ganyremote-2_8-1_fc9:F-9:anyremote:1209153297 ganyremote-2_8-2_fc9:F-9:anyremote:1209153884 ganyremote-2_8-2_fc10:devel:anyremote:1209154025 ganyremote-2_8-2_fc10:devel:anyremote:1209155226 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 -------------------------------------------------- How to clean-up all the tags ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252057.m3PKvYuB009069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-25 16:57 EST ------- No problems. Been looking for some packages to maintain for a while to get involved :) geoclue has just done another release so the autogen.sh stuff can disappear, but there's a missing file from the tar ball as far as I can tell so I'll upload a new version once I can get it to build. For the static libraries do I just rm them from the build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 20:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252055.m3PKtO5T008809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 ------- Additional Comments From richardfearn at gmail.com 2008-04-25 16:55 EST ------- Thanks again to Michael and Nicolas for your comments. I've addressed the issues raised by Michael and included EWF support. The new spec file and SRPM can be found here: Spec URL: http://richardfearn.co.uk/files/fedora/disktype-9-2/disktype.spec SRPM URL: http://richardfearn.co.uk/files/fedora/disktype-9-2/disktype-9-2.fc8.src.rpm The SRPM builds using mock against Fedora 9. The resulting RPMs are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 21:00:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435576] Review Request: ncdu - Ncurses disk usage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252100.m3PL0uWk012799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncdu - Ncurses disk usage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435576 ------- Additional Comments From richardfearn at gmail.com 2008-04-25 17:00 EST ------- Thanks for your comments on this package, too, Michael - I'll be updating the package over the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 21:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252108.m3PL8uHe011428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-04-25 17:08 EST ------- But anyway "make build" works OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 21:24:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252124.m3PLOWhN016983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-25 17:24 EST ------- OK new version SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue-0.11.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 21:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252127.m3PLRRir014693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-25 17:27 EST ------- with static libraries, do you mean .la files ? those are actually libtool archives, and yes, rm is the right treatment for them. Actual static libaries are .a files, but you are configuring with --disable-static, so those should not be produced in the first place. I they are, then again rm is the easiest solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 21:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252137.m3PLbgYd016514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-25 17:37 EST ------- the .la files are removed in the last spec file so I think I've got the requirements now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 21:36:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] New: Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 Summary: Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/djview4/djview4.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/djview4/djview4-4.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: DjView4 is a DjVu document viewer with the following features: o continuous scrolling of pages o side-by-side display of pages o display thumbnails as a grid o display outlines o page names supported o metadata dialog It's based on DjVuLibre and Qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435576] Review Request: ncdu - Ncurses disk usage In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252203.m3PM3d94023721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncdu - Ncurses disk usage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435576 ------- Additional Comments From richardfearn at gmail.com 2008-04-25 18:03 EST ------- I've made a new package available: Spec URL: http://richardfearn.co.uk/files/fedora/ncdu-1.3-2/ncdu.spec SRPM URL: http://richardfearn.co.uk/files/fedora/ncdu-1.3-2/ncdu-1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm This incorporates the suggestions made by Michael in comment 1. It builds against Fedora 9 using mock. The resulting RPMs are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:09:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444235] Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252209.m3PM9RiG024615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: djview4 - DjVu viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444235 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: djview4 - |Review Request: djview4 - |DjVu viewer |DjVu viewer ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-25 18:09 EST ------- Sure, take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:50:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438039] Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252250.m3PMogW7031678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438039 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-25 18:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/GMT-coastlines.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/GMT-coastlines-1.9-3.src.rpm * Fri Apr 25 2008 Orion Poplawski 1.9-3 - Add lowercase provides - Fix URLs and timestamps - Add comment about source Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:50:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252250.m3PMoUeW028935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-25 18:50 EST ------- Thanks Tom and Andrew for all your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 22:52:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252252.m3PMqmZj029201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 fedora at matbooth.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-25 18:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: brazil Short Description: Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack Owners: mbooth Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 23:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252300.m3PN0An3030538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-25 19:00 EST ------- After adding BuildRequires: gtk2-devel BuildRequires: NetworkManager-devel I was able to build this in mock, so we are getting somewhere. rpmlint has some complaints: geoclue.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/geoclue-0.11.1/ChangeLog geoclue.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libgeoclue.so.0.0.0 geoclue.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libgeoclue.so.0.0.0 geoclue.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/geoclue-0.11.1/NEWS geoclue.i386: E: description-line-too-long Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service built on top of the D-Bus messaging system. The goal of the Geoclue project is to make creating location-aware applications as simple as possible. geoclue.i386: W: non-standard-group System geoclue.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL all of these are easy fixes, thankfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 23:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252340.m3PNe8jR004601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-25 19:40 EST ------- OK, I think I've fixed all of those errors. I've put the main library rpm in the "System Environment/Libraries" but not sure what group the test gui should go in. Maybe its just late but I can't see anything in the packaging guidelines about groups. SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue-0.11.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 23:45:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252345.m3PNjU23005566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-25 19:45 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Apr 25 23:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804252353.m3PNrMJE006526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-25 19:53 EST ------- See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPLv2+ with exceptions) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 4e95d69e6910c4c0dcafb7e2f8dc5491 ocaml-gettext-0.2.0.tar.gz 4e95d69e6910c4c0dcafb7e2f8dc5491 ocaml-gettext-0.2.0.tar.gz.orig OK - Package needs ExcludeArch See below - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. See below - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Whats with the odd release naming? If you need a snapshot release, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-cfd71146dbb6f00cec9fe3623ea619f843394837 and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-615f6271efb394ab340a93a6cf030f2d08cf0d49 2. I see in the build output: checking for fop... no configure: WARNING: Cannot find fop." Missing buildrequires? 3. Looks like the camomile-devel and devel subpackages duplicate all the docs... That doesn't seem very ideal. %doc README CHANGELOG TODO build/share/doc/html/* on both of them. 4. rpmlint says: ocaml-gettext-camomile.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This can be ignored as you can't make just a subpackage noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 00:34:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260034.m3Q0Y57L016022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-25 20:34 EST ------- Yeah, looks fine now, basically. For rpm groups, I would just pick something like Development/Libraries, since the demo is about showing how to use the geoclue libraries. I'll do a formal review sometime this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 00:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444245] New: Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444245 Summary: Review Request: whatsup - Node up/down detection utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/whatsup.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/whatsup-1.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Whatsup is a cluster node up/down detection utility. Whatsup can quickly calculate and output the up and down nodes of a cluster. Whatsup allows some tools, such as Pdsh, to operate more quickly by not operating on down nodes. Whatsup calculates the up and down nodes of a cluster through one of several possible backend tools and several optional cluster node databases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 01:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260135.m3Q1Zv37023544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jtulach at netbeans.org ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-04-25 21:35 EST ------- *** Bug 439262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 01:35:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260135.m3Q1ZutK023511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 fitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat.com 2008-04-25 21:35 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433497 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 01:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260135.m3Q1Zw3W023576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 Bug 439265 depends on bug 439262, which changed state. Bug 439262 Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 02:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260233.m3Q2XDYq004026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-25 22:33 EST ------- Thanks everyone! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Falcon Short Description: The Falcon Programming Language Owners: salimma Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 02:39:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260239.m3Q2dUPc002462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-25 22:39 EST ------- Perhaps you also want to request F-9 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 05:00:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444257] New: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444257 Summary: Review Request: nted - Musical score editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/nted.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/music/nted-0.22.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: NtEd is a GTK score editor. It intends to be really WYSIWYG: what you see on the screen is exactly what you get on printer output. It supports up to 4 voices per staff, drum notes, 5 lyrics lines, N-Tuplets, context changes, repeats with alternatives, configurable music instruments per staff, MIDI and Postscript export, MusicXML import. Scores can be played through the ALSA sequencer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 05:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260555.m3Q5twfP004587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-26 01:55 EST ------- Does not build even on i386 - At least "flex byacc" are missing from BuildRequires - Even if "flex byacc" are added to BuildRequires, build still fails http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=584014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 06:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260602.m3Q62YtY005691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-26 02:02 EST ------- Okay. - This package is now clean - Your another review request seems good to some extent (some fix seems needed although) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (cwiid) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 06:08:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260608.m3Q68aOP006621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-26 02:08 EST ------- If you want to re-tag, just bump release number. If build is okay, - For F-8 visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and request to push your package to repository - For F-9 visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ _later_. We cannot request to push packages for now. and close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 07:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260700.m3Q70AhK014818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 07:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260715.m3Q7FsKm017437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-26 03:15 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: 2c9824b67a09bdbb99ac11ea319b705bf6c09dd2 SAASound-3.2.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (BSD). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, ldconfig call present N/A owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 07:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260721.m3Q7LILn015681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-26 03:21 EST ------- Thanks for looking at this. The story with naming is that I've patched this to work with OCaml 3.10 and contributed the patch upstream. Coincidentally the author blogged about this yesterday: http://le-gall.net/sylvain+violaine/blog/index.php?2008/04/24/43-ocaml-gettext-on-going-progress-to-version-030 BTW, I wouldn't believe that release date .. seen too many release dates come and go already, although it'd be nice if it happens. Anyway, I changed the naming to conform with guidelines. Fop - this is a saga: If enabled, it causes a giant Java backtrace / error, and there seems to be no way to disable just fop (I even tried patching aclocal.m4). So in the meantime I've disabled the documentation. Here's a new version that should fix everything: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-gettext-0.2.0-3.20080321patch.fc9.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=584043 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 07:29:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260729.m3Q7Tf5a019300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-26 03:29 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SAASound Short Description: Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 08:03:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260803.m3Q83qbv026341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 ------- Additional Comments From romal at gmx.de 2008-04-26 04:03 EST ------- This is my first rpm, so it may be horrible :-O -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 08:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444264] New: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444264 Summary: Review Request: usb_modeswitch - brings umts / 4g cards into operational mode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: romal at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.romal.de/files/usb_modeswitch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.romal.de/files/usb_modeswitch-0.9.4beta2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: USB Modeswitch brings up your datacard into operational mode. When plugged in they identify themself as cdrom and present some non-Linux compatible installation files. This tool deactivates this cdrom-devices and enables the real communication device. It supports most devices built and sold by Huawei, T-Mobile, Vodafone, Option, ZTE, Novatel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 08:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:23:29 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_444224=5D_Review_Request=3A_samcoupe-rom_-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_SAM_Coup=C3=A9_=28Spectrum_compatible_homecomputer?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=29_ROM_file?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260823.m3Q8NTsW029935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-26 04:23 EST ------- Looks good, per http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-April/000471.html the content (ROM) was ACKed by Spot. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 08:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260845.m3Q8jnC9030771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-26 04:45 EST ------- OK source files match upstream: 16b0a06e47d344ea75d64f350d3f9f0bee2d2b7e SimCoupe-1.0.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK is a GUI app, desktop file correctly installed this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 08:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260847.m3Q8lhx9001217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-26 04:47 EST ------- Fixed up the group for the test gui, also removed the gtk requirement as it should get it automatically. SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue-0.11.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 09:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260902.m3Q92tpx001293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-26 05:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: simcoupe Short Description: SAM Coup? emulator (spectrum compatible) Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 09:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:02:10 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_444224=5D_Review_Request=3A_samcoupe-rom_-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_SAM_Coup=C3=A9_=28Spectrum_compatible_homecomputer?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=29_ROM_file?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804260902.m3Q92A3Z003543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-26 05:02 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: samcoupe-rom Short Description: SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 12:33:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261233.m3QCXk7b006296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-04-26 08:33 EST ------- As i'm not a sponsor, only a few comments. - lastest version is 0.9.23 - you should requires php(zend-abi) (not php(zend-api)) - use %setup -q -n suhosin-%{version} (which simplify other part) - no need to requires php-common as the php(zend-abi) assure ABI compatibility of extension. It will be great to provides a config file with some recommended value (for ex : suhosin.log.sapi=S_ALL, and probably others) Do you succeed to run the test suite ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 15:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261527.m3QFRqdH002139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-26 11:27 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm-0.13.2d-37.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Apr 26 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 0.13.2d-37 - Fix comment about texlive-texmf [tex(tex)] BuildRequires - Rename config file tp dvipdfm-config in SRPM - Add INSTALL='install -p' to makeinstall - Run mktexlsr on install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 16:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225863] Merge Review: gsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261635.m3QGZfQN013229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225863 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 12:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 16:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261641.m3QGfYmQ011992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 12:41 EST ------- cvs done. (I also did a F-9 branch as it makes little sense not to at this point). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 16:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426883] Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261639.m3QGdfo3011376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: brazil - Extremely small footprint Java HTTP stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426883 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 12:39 EST ------- I assume from comment #10 this is approved, so setting the fedora-review flag to +. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 16:42:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261642.m3QGghFk014364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 16:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:44:36 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_444224=5D_Review_Request=3A_samcoupe-rom_-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_SAM_Coup=C3=A9_=28Spectrum_compatible_homecomputer?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=29_ROM_file?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261644.m3QGiabL012381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 12:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 16:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261646.m3QGkbDf015114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 12:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 17:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261723.m3QHNUOZ021136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From gkriehn at csufresno.edu 2008-04-26 13:23 EST ------- All right. Please see the following updated SPEC file and SRC rpm: Spec: http://optics.csufresno.edu/fedora/extras/8/SPECS/xosview.spec SRPM: http://optics.csufresno.edu/fedora/extras/8/SRPMS/xosview-1.8.3.20080425cvs-8.fc8.src.rpm The following things have been fixed: - License Issue & COPYING.BSD file (see comments) - Pulling directly source - Removed corresponding cvs patch (diff) file - Fixed Post-Release Naming Guidelines - Fixed Categories section in Desktop file I believe... ...everything is fixed. rpmlint is silent. Thanks for your patience in this! I will probably start the process of uploading new spec files for other applications and tighten up the spec files based upon the feedback here. Greg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 18:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261800.m3QI0C6c027010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-26 14:00 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. Is there any particular reason to prefer byacc over bison ? As to the build failure, unfortunately I'm unable to reproduce it. I'm now trying to build via 'mock', so may be things will look different there. One thing I noticed is an error in your build.log is this: ln: creating symbolic link `/builddir/build/BUILD/synopsis-0.11/src/Synopsis/gc/atomic_ops.c' : File exists The appropriate line in configure.ac is: test -e ${srcdir}/atomic_ops.c \ || ln -s ${srcdir}/libatomic_ops/src/atomic_ops.c \ ${srcdir}/atomic_ops.c which means the link command should only be executed if the link target doesn't exist yet. I wonder why this doesn't work for you. Is your version of the shell buggy ? (This may be unrelated to the final error, I'm merely trying to find any hints in the build.log that could explain why I can't reproduce the problem.) Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 18:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261817.m3QIHM0Z027670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From jtulach at netbeans.org 2008-04-26 14:17 EST ------- Thanks for hint, but I've just tried to change the fedora-cvs flag and this is the reply: You tried to grant fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can make this change. Please press Back and try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 18:35:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261835.m3QIZnb7000363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 14:35 EST ------- Jaroslav: I still don't see you in the cvsextras group. Take a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b (step 4 of that link) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 19:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804261918.m3QJI6YO005414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-26 15:18 EST ------- Excellent. That solves all the issues I see...so this package is APPROVED. You might wait a day or two to import on the chance that 0.3.0 comes out. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 20:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804262043.m3QKh952019763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-26 16:43 EST ------- Heh, I've been waiting for this one too long. Thanks for doing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 20:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804262044.m3QKiqHj021348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-26 16:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-gettext Short Description: OCaml library for i18n Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 21:17:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804262117.m3QLHHXS026871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-26 17:17 EST ------- (Just a little note to let you know that I can reproduce the error when building via mock. I'll thus be able to track the problem down on my own, thanks.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 22:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804262236.m3QMav5v007411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2008-04-26 18:36 EST ------- Okay, I'm now testing with Fedora 9 Preview. The patch for configure does work. I sympathize with the dislike for the non-standard configure script and Makefiles. They can be quite cumbersome at times. Due to other projects with which I am involved I am familiar with autotools, and in my opinion, the score between them really is par. autotools, itself, can be quite cumbersome... not only for developers, but also for users who may have to hunt down specific versions of autotools to make things work right. I am in no way against looking for a better way, even if that does mean autotools, but for now it's probably best to address the issues in the existing configure script and wait for such a time as someone passionate about this issue comes along - or until an undeniable advantage manifests itself in making a conversion. 1) "The test trying to check for -O -g must have failed." Indeed. This has now been fixed. 2) Traditionally HylaFAX configure used --with-GCOPTS= and --with-GCXXOPTS instead of CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. I've now made configure use CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS instead if GCOPTS and GCXXOPTS are not given. 3) I'm not having a problem with PAM detection: Checking for PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) support ... found. Enabling PAM support I get this both with the source build (from tarball) and with rpmbuild. Are you sure that you have pam-devel installed? Please check again with the SRPM that I'll link below. 4) "Using ZLIB include files from" This can be ignored. I've made configure not print this message if $ZLIBINC is empty. 5) "./configure: line 3274: 28995 Segmentation fault $TIFFBIN/tiffcp -c g4 misc/jbig.tif misc/foo.tif > /dev/null 2>&1" Here configure is checking to see if your libtiff supports JBIG or not, and it doesn't, and in fact your libtiff segfaults when trying to process JBIG-compressed TIFF files. configure correctly interprets this, however, the output is, indeed, annoying, and so I've made configure now silence this. 6) I'm not sure how to resolve this one. configure takes efforts to find the needed library headers in non-standard locations and then uses -I for them. Assuming it finds them in /usr/include then that's what you're seeing. When should -I be used or not? 7) From the spec file comments: # FAXUSER, FAXGROUP, SYSUSER and SYSGROUP are set to the current user to # avoid warnings about chown/chgrp if the user building the SRPM is not root; # they are set to the correct values with the RPM attr macro Thanks. SPEC: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Apr 26 23:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444315] New: mousetweaks - Mouse accessibility support for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444315 Summary: mousetweaks - Mouse accessibility support for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com The Mousetweaks package provides mouse accessibility enhancements for the GNOME desktop, such as performing various clicks without using any hardware button. The options can be accessed through the Accessibility tab of the Mouse Preferences of GNOME Control Center or through command-line. http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/mousetweaks.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/mousetweaks-2.22.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 00:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804270055.m3R0tw0o029109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-26 20:55 EST ------- I have updated the srpm at http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/synopsis-0.11-1.fc8.src.rpm to circumvent the compilation error, by using a pre-installed libgc / libgc-devel package. Compilation now succeeds with i368 as well as x86_64, and I see the packaging error I mentioned earlier: %{_libdir} is set to /usr/lib64, but Synopsis installed its library into /usr/lib. Where does rpmbuild get its _libdir value from ? I can't find any way to establish on what platforms to install in /usr/lib64, and where to install into /usr/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 10:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440393] Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271026.m3RAQQYZ019828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-lzo - Python bindings for lzo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440393 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-27 06:26 EST ------- Is this built for all requested branches so that we can close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 10:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438932] Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271028.m3RASUQl019948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libotf - Library for handling OpenType Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438932 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-27 06:28 EST ------- sorry I thought I posted review here but it seems I need to do that yet. Will review this tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 10:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439141] Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271027.m3RARFE8021223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-demjson - Python JSON module and lint checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439141 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-27 06:27 EST ------- is this pushed to rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 10:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439240] Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271029.m3RATnrK021377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-FastMmap - Uses an mmap'ed file to act as a shared memory interprocess cache Alias: perl-Cache-FastMmap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439240 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-27 06:29 EST ------- any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 10:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271026.m3RAQQ5d021163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-27 06:26 EST ------- No reply from package submitter. I will prefer to move away from such reviews where no updated has been provided by package submitter for more than 15 days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 11:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271111.m3RBBLm1027113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 manilla_corp at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manilla_corp at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From manilla_corp at hotmail.com 2008-04-27 07:11 EST ------- Can anyone give estimates on when DKIM support will be officially included for PostFix with RHEL? Imho. it's a very urgently required addition as by the end of 2007 all financial institutions and fortune 500 companies will be using DKIM for mailings and already over half the companies sending mail to Yahoo are using DKIM. I would say having DKIM support included is just as important as having the MTA itself included with the OS, because only thing worse than not being able to send e-mail is sending e-mail that nobody will get - Yahoo puts mail without DKIM through extra filtering. What should be used for setting up PostFix with DKIM/DK - This perl module? The sendmail dkim-milter? The Mail-DKIM and DKIMProxy? Or amavisd-new? http://www.dkim.org/deploy/index.htm A quick and easy solution would be very welcome so each and every webmaster wouldn't have to waste days researching and setting it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 11:44:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271144.m3RBiBJO032210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-27 07:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for the feedback ! It seems this is an incompatibility with yacc (it > works fine with bison). I have fixed this problem, and will submit a new source > package soon. > > I'v been trying to package this on a x86_64 box myself, and run into another > issue. May be you know how to address this: > > In my spec file I list files, using the %{_libdir} variable, as per your earlier > suggestion. This expands to /usr/lib64. However, the buildsystem itself uses > autoconf, which provides a 'libdir' variable, but which expands to /usr/lib. > Thus, my library files end up in /usr/lib, and then rpmbuild tries to find them > in /usr/lib64, and obviously fails. > What can I do about that ? autoconf and rpmbuild seem to disagree about the file > system layout. Is there a way around this ? Is this a known issue ? > > Thanks ! Fedora/redhat have a patched autoconf that handles the multi-arch lib issue. Most times, you just need to do: autoreconf -f -i and then do configure, build... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 12:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237579] Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271204.m3RC4wSN005003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cernlib-g77 - General purpose CERN library and associated binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237579 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 12:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271238.m3RCc2vH011271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-27 08:38 EST ------- There are a couple of small changes that you should make to the spec: * your build section does not make use of the SMP flags (see Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake); fixable by adding %{?_smp_mflags} to the make line in %build * preserving timestamps; partially fixable by adding INSTALL="install -p" to the " %make install " line in %install; this will the timestamps for files included in squirrel-devel and squirrel-debuginfo. A nice touch would be to use "touch -r "in order to also preserve preserve the timestamps of the 3 files modified via sed (in %prep) * Each %files section should have a %defattr line (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 12:40:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271240.m3RCe4Mh010229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 08:40 EST ------- Setting cvs flag, my comments aren't blockers at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 13:04:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271304.m3RD4GAf014180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concordance - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-04-27 09:04 EST ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 2008-04-27 13:00:00 review of http://www.silfreed.net/download/repo/packages/concordance/concordance-0.20-2.src.rpm $ sha1sum concordance.spec 19f0483a2e2c192f3ac4282f3279a841195ba700 concordance.spec Generic review checklist: ========================= ? MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Nothing to see: $ rpmlint concordance-0.20-2.fc9.src.rpm concordance-0.20-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm \ concordance-debuginfo-0.20-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm $ ? MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK ? MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK ? MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK ? MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK ? MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK ? MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. This package depends on libconcord, which is not available in koji right now. So this bit can't be checked till libconcord is approved. However a local x86_64 mock build worked fine. ? MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 Not checked for the aforementionned reasons ? MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. See the freeform review. ? MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK ? MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: N/A ? MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A ? MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. N/A ? MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK ? MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK ? MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK ? MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK ? MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK ? MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) N/A ? MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK ? MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A ? MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A ? MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A ? MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A ? MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A ? MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. N/A ? MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A ? MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK ? MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK ? MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ? SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A ? SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A ? SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. OK ? SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. See before ? SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. $ date && concordance -vK && concordance -vk dim avr 27 14:42:51 CEST 2008 Concordance 0.20 Copyright 2007 Kevin Timmerman and Phil Dibowitz This software is distributed under the GPLv3. Requesting Identity: 100% done Remote time has been set to 2008/04/27 Sun 14:42:51 +0 Success! Concordance 0.20 Copyright 2007 Kevin Timmerman and Phil Dibowitz This software is distributed under the GPLv3. Requesting Identity: Error requesting identity Failed with error 1 $ concordance -vk Concordance 0.20 Copyright 2007 Kevin Timmerman and Phil Dibowitz This software is distributed under the GPLv3. Requesting Identity: 100% done Remote time is 2008/04/27 Sun 14:43:07 +0 Success! ? SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A ? SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A ? SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A ? SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. N/A Freeform comments: ================== Spec mostly ok, however: ? please use a downloads.sourceforge.net source URL such as http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%version}.tar.bz2 ? please remove the private copy of getopt sources in %prep to make sure you don't accidently build against it ? please add the rest of the documentation files to %doc, such as SubmittingPatches, Codingstyle, %{name}/INSTALL.linux ? please make the project submit a patch to the linux-input ML so harmony USB ids are not claimed by the HID driver by default (it's all fine and dandy to unbind dynamically but not binding at all in the first place is much preferred) ? please fix this x86_64 build warning: concordance.c: In function 'cb_print_percent_status': concordance.c:126: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size ? please remove the pam_console/udev glue & deps, it's supposed to be totally deprecated in favor of ConsoleKit/PolicyKit nowadays ? it would be nice to define a specific CK access_control.type ? it would be nice to merge the CK bits upstream ? it would be nice to run your generated XML files through xmllint, both to have them pretty-indented and to make sure they do not have a syntax problem. ? please remove the harmony Obsoletes/Provides, harmony was never distributed by Fedora and these rules can only bite you later. Anyway, a lot of this can be taken care of over time (but do not wait too long) ? APPROVED, on the condition libconcord is merged too -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgUeVwACgkQI2bVKDsp8g36wQCgnwaxOoxU+vheK2G+00qrwTGN IxEAoKohFWl5PthSpHu3yNqRB2j03S5q =LqUA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 13:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271340.m3RDeRgu020612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-04-27 09:40 EST ------- Hi, Latest SRPM - http://tinyurl.com/67j943 Latest SPEC - http://tinyurl.com/6bpsqg > - On rawhide pulseaudio-devel does not exist, and BR is sufficient with > pulseaudio-libs-devel Added BR of pulseaudio-lib-devel > - BR: dotconf is not needed (redundant). BR: dotconf-devel is enough. Removed. > - /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/speechd-0.3-py2.5.egg-info is only > created (automatically) on F-9+. Done by adding ownership of this file if OS is Fedora 9 or greater. (Hopefully it will now work on RawHide) Note : I am a little unclear about the unpackaged "/usr/share/info/dir". I cannot seem to find it in my buildroot. Is this also automatically created in F-9+? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 13:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271358.m3RDws2s023241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 09:58 EST ------- This is built, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 14:27:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438039] Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271427.m3RERsRb028062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438039 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 10:27 EST ------- * rpmlint says GMT-coastlines.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 17) GMT-coastlines-full.noarch: W: no-documentation GMT-coastlines-high.noarch: W: no-documentation GMT-coastlines-all.noarch: W: no-documentation it would be nice to fix the first one, but not a blocker (lower case provides have tab in front...). All the comments are fixed $ md5sum ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_* 3eda660b999ee888ff59f6c7eba209a6 ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_coast.tar.bz2 2d3064c3fa2f7a4c3a2603dbb9885fff ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_full.tar.bz2 de50a3eab394393a7246f293ac0c840a ../SOURCES/GSHHS1.9_high.tar.bz2 still matching upstream. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 15:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271516.m3RFGYRb003842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 11:16 EST ------- * rpmlint is still unhappy: dvipdfm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 16) dvipdfm.src: W: strange-permission dvipdft 0775 dvipdfm.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/dvipdft.1.gz dvipdfm.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/ebb.1.gz These should be fixed. The comment about the BR tex(tex) wasn't changed (as far as I can tell). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 15:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443807] Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271526.m3RFQ0J8005405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-pptp - PPTP support for NetworkManager Alias: nm-pptp-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443807 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-27 11:25 EST ------- All done. Thanks Kevin, Thanks Dan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 15:52:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271552.m3RFqSMT009785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-27 11:52 EST ------- Assigning. Will check in detail later, however in advance: (In reply to comment #21) > Note : I am a little unclear about the unpackaged "/usr/share/info/dir". I > cannot seem to find it in my buildroot. Is this also automatically > created in F-9+? No (to the question "Is this also automatically created in F-9+?"). If you try mockbuild you can reproduce this error. Or you can reproduce this failure by ------------------------------------------------------------------ $ export PATH="/usr/sbin:/sbin:$PATH" $ rpmbuild --rebuild ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 15:58:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271558.m3RFwLfI010632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 16:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271608.m3RG8pgT012596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr 2008-04-27 12:08 EST ------- Is your first package, and i am seeking a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 16:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271607.m3RG7Knw013751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-27 12:07 EST ------- (Removing needsponsor: I am sponsoring the submitter) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 16:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271606.m3RG6b5D013653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-27 12:06 EST ------- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 16:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444134] Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271610.m3RGAJ71013190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spe - Python IDE editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444134 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.mercier at hotmail.fr 2008-04-27 12:10 EST ------- sorry, Is my first package, and i am seeking a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 16:21:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222998] Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271621.m3RGLsmh016141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iDesk - Desktop icons and background for minimal WMs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222998 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-27 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. Note that I also did a F-9 branch, as that is now available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 16:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271631.m3RGVmZR016523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-27 12:31 EST ------- Yeah, I have a interest in the virt-* tools and this is needed for the new ones you added for review. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 17:14:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442276] Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271714.m3RHEDan023170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evas - Hardware-accelerated state-aware canvas API for X-Windows https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442276 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 13:14 EST ------- You should have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks more precisely, the part about 'Doxygen footers', it seems to me to be an issue here. Also you could have a look at 'Timestamps', though it is a less problematic issue. The pkgconfig files are strange (except for evas.pc) since they are almost empty. I couldn't find a doc explaining how they should be used, and the doc only talks about evas-config which seems to be obsolete. But I guess that this is wrong as is (and the evas.pc file is right). Also for my packages, in general graphviz BuildRequires was needed in addition to doxygen, but it is not sure that it is needed for evas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 17:21:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271721.m3RHL6Fv025935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 13:21 EST ------- The latest upstream version is 0.3.2.1, it includes lxde-settings for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 17:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271745.m3RHj3fl028469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-27 13:45 EST ------- Not sure I followed that last direction, "Join" wiki. :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 17:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271759.m3RHxbLE031685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 bogado at bogado.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-27 13:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cwiid Short Description: Wiimote interface library Owners: bogado Branches: F-9, F-9 InitialCC: bogado Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 18:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271800.m3RI0Spf031159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-27 14:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cwiid Short Description: Wiimote interface library Owners: bogado Branches: F-8, F-9 InitialCC: bogado Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 18:01:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271801.m3RI1bCC032475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-04-27 14:01 EST ------- I know, but this is exactly the problem. lxde-settings is arch dependend while the rest of the package is noarch. I think I'm going to split out the nuoveXT-icon-theme completely anyway but I'm unsure what do to with the rest. I'd like to have two packages called lxde-common and lxde-settings, both have different arches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 18:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444356] New: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356 Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bpython/bpython.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bpython/bpython-0.2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: bpython is a fancy interface to the Python interpreter for Unix-like operating systems. It has the following features: o in-line syntax highlighting o readline-like autocomplete with suggestions displayed as you type o expected parameter list for any Python function. o eewind function to pop the last line of code from memory and re-evaluate. o send the code you've entered off to a pastebin and display the pastebin URL for copying, etc. o save the code you've entered to a file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 19:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804271958.m3RJwdMS018039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-04-27 15:58 EST ------- Thak you for your comments. I have dicide to supproess the generation of the debuginfo file, because I thing it's make no sense to generating one. Updates files are uploaded on: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.4.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 20:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443310] Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272043.m3RKhCng025651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-theme-nodoka - Nodoka theme for xfwm4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443310 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-27 16:43 EST ------- xfwm4-theme-nodoka-0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 20:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442295] Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272040.m3RKekia026656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thunar-shares - Thunar file manager extension to share files using Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442295 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-04-27 16:40 EST ------- thunar-shares-0.10-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 21:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272116.m3RLGWvv031490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |442953 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 21:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272119.m3RLJVBO032738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 17:19 EST ------- Maybe upstream could be convinced to have lxde-settings as a separate package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 21:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272130.m3RLUJWW001316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-27 17:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfm-0.13.2d-38.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Apr 27 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 0.13.2d-38 - Untabify spec file - Ensure dvipdft is not executeable in SRPM - Ensure man pages are UTF-8 - Fix comment about tex(tex) rpmlint is now silent. (In reply to comment #5) > The comment about the BR tex(tex) wasn't changed (as far as I can tell). Sorry - I had changed one of the two comments about tex(tex), but not the other. Fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 21:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443177] Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272134.m3RLY7kS001662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: html2ps - HTML to PostScript converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443177 ------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2008-04-27 17:34 EST ------- Sorry for the delays, I'll formalize the review later today but.... At the moment it looks really good! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=585137 so unless I find anything mysteriously wrong with it, it'll be an approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 21:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272151.m3RLpIJV004786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 21:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272151.m3RLp6pW004742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-27 17:51 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * follow guidelines * match upstream 9d450a964511e4bd68051e793037d8d9 dvipdfm-0.13.2d.tar.gz * %files section right APPROVED I am ok to be in initialCC and commit messages. Jindrich? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 22:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442873] Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272201.m3RM1txB007691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-df - Utility like 'df' for virtual guests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 Bug 442873 depends on bug 442867, which changed state. Bug 442867 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 22:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442875] Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272201.m3RM1wx7007754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-ctrl - Graphical management app for virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 Bug 442875 depends on bug 442867, which changed state. Bug 442867 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 22:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442871] Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272201.m3RM1vgX007729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: virt-top - Utility like top(1) for displaying virtualization stats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 Bug 442871 depends on bug 442867, which changed state. Bug 442867 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 22:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442867] Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272201.m3RM1rtL007668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-gettext - OCaml library for i18n https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442867 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-27 18:01 EST ------- devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=585140 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=585139 Not built for F-8 yet because I'm waiting for ocaml-camomile to work its way into stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 22:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272207.m3RM78xf007636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-27 18:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * rpmlint is silent > * follow guidelines > * match upstream > 9d450a964511e4bd68051e793037d8d9 dvipdfm-0.13.2d.tar.gz > * %files section right > > APPROVED > > I am ok to be in initialCC and commit messages. > > Jindrich? Thanks. Jindrich - we'll need to coordinate removal of the relevant parts ot he texlive packaging of dvipdfm as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 23:16:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] New: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smilner at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/deco.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/deco-0.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: deco is a Un*x script able to extract various archive file formats with features like consistent behavior, consistent interface and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Apr 27 23:21:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804272321.m3RNLeQ6019960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2008-04-27 19:21 EST ------- rpmlint outputs the following ... this is due to how the application matches file extensions with how to extract them .. [steve at tachikoman i386]$ rpmlint deco-0.8.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm deco.i386: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext /usr/share/deco/tbz tar.bz2 deco.i386: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext /usr/share/deco/taz tar.gz deco.i386: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext /usr/share/deco/tar.z tar.gz deco.i386: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext /usr/share/deco/tgz tar.gz [steve at tachikoman i386]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:01:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280101.m3S116Jc004028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-27 21:01 EST ------- Ah, interesting. It isn't the autoconf version that ships with Fedora 8, as that is what I use for development, or is it ? Where can I get that version of autoconf ? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 01:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280116.m3S1GMIU006725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-04-27 21:16 EST ------- The autoconf version that ships with F8 has that modification. Just try running autoreconf -f -i as the first build step - I'm pretty sure that fixed a bunch of instances of the problem you are describing in my experience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 02:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280200.m3S20oTe014804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-27 22:00 EST ------- Well, I ran 'autoconf' (et al.) on a Fedora 8 x86_64 box, and it replaces @libdir@ by $(exec_prefix)/lib. I even ran 'autoreconf -f -i' just to be sure (even though that shouldn't make a difference, as that only invokes the same autoconf again, IIUC), and indeed, the result remains the same. rpm -qf /usr/bin/autoconf reports 'autoconf-2.61-9.fc8'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 02:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280253.m3S2rA4R023429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-27 22:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=303932) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=303932&action=view) Workaround patch for lib64 issue lib64 issue is not coming from autotool generated files. I don't know who wrote install_clib.py first, however the culprit is this file ($ grep -r libSynopsis . gives us a great hint :) ) A workaround patch is attached. The build result is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=585227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 03:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280312.m3S3CtOC027431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-27 23:12 EST ------- Yes, install_clib.py is mine, and yes, it hardcodes 'lib' into the installation path. However, the version I'm experimenting with delegates installation to the Makefile (as I expected /hoped that at least there autoconf would generate the correct $(libdir) variable. It doesn't. (See my previous mail.) While I understand your patch works for the platforms you tested on, I don't think this is a solution. There are platforms that support both, 32-bit as well as 64-bit version to be installed side-by-side. Doing a 32-bit build on that platform will still find /usr/lib64, and thus wrongly attempt to install the 32-bit libSynopsis.so there. So once again, where can I find an autoconf version that replaces @libdir@ by $(exec_prefix)/lib64 on the appropriate platforms ? (If everything else fails, I have been contemplating a work-around that would involve passing a --libdir variable down to the install command from within the synopsis.spec file, so no matter whether autoconf gets it right, I use whatever rpmbuild wants me to use.) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 03:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280350.m3S3oVJj000880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-27 23:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Yes, install_clib.py is mine, and yes, it hardcodes 'lib' into the installation > path. So anyway this file must be fixed, mustn't it? > However, the version I'm experimenting with delegates installation to the > Makefile What do you mean by this? > While I understand your patch works for the platforms you tested on, I don't > think this is a solution. So I said "workaround" > So once again, where can I find an autoconf version that replaces @libdir@ by > $(exec_prefix)/lib64 on the appropriate platforms ? Umm.. it maybe that I don't understand what you say here, however on usual "configure -> make -> make install" way, we always pass "--libdir=%{_libdir}" to configure, so in the sence @libdir@ is not automatically replaced by %_libdir. Would you explain what you say here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 04:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280433.m3S4X0ij008519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-28 00:33 EST ------- Heureka ! :-) I updated the preview srpm on synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm. I now pass --libdir=%{_libdir} to configure, and I changed the install_clib command to run 'make install' in src/ (which thus uses the %{_libdir} variable obtained from rpmbuild). And indeed, with this change mock building synopsis rpms works for both i386 as well as x86_64. (Yay !) I still don't understand where a patched autoconf comes into play, but that may have become irrelevant with this new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 06:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280612.m3S6Cdgb025068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-04-28 02:12 EST ------- This has been updated to work with libyahoo2 0.7.6: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo.spec http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo-3.5.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 06:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280611.m3S6BMHF025893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-04-28 02:11 EST ------- Upstream (me in this case) released 0.7.6. I've updated my SRPM and spec file: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2.spec http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2-0.7.6-1.src.rpm iconv issue I was experiencing above no longer occurs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 07:12:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280712.m3S7Cpdg002911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-28 03:12 EST ------- Well, I will check this later, however as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 07:19:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433925] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280719.m3S7JrNH005044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-04-28 03:19 EST ------- Good news. There is only one issue left: *Full path to source tarball still missing. You must specify full path to source's tarball, not only %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2. For SF-hosted projects we have special requirements for %Source field - take a look at this page (at the bottom): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Please fix it and I'll review asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 07:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280730.m3S7UwxJ006265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-28 03:30 EST ------- I'm still waiting for the original submitter of this package to update it. As for your original question, I suggest you post something to one of the mailing lists, eg. fedora-devel-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 07:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280741.m3S7fEVN009211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim - Simple Instant Messenger Alias: sim-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-04-28 03:41 EST ------- I reinstall my computer and forgot to archive sim in non home directory :( But I've started again with upstream spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 07:48:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280748.m3S7mXN4010273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-28 03:48 EST ------- Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel-2.2-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Apr 27 2008 Dan Horak 2.2-2 - enable parallel make - add missing %%defattr for subpackages - preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 08:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280835.m3S8ZcG9020207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-28 04:35 EST ------- I the %package doc, I think it should be: Requires: tetex-doc and not BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 08:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280836.m3S8avFV019377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-28 04:36 EST ------- Also I think that the doc subpackage doesn't need the main package, one may want to study the doc without actually installing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 08:53:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443374] Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804280853.m3S8ri1l023355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openhpi-subagent - SNMP subagent for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443374 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-28 04:53 EST ------- imported and built in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 10:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281034.m3SAYg37009252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-04-28 06:34 EST ------- Just a note after a quick glance over the spec: - "Source0:" should include the full path to the downloadable source file, i.e. http://hartlich.com/deco/download/deco-0.8.1.tar.gz - you should not use absolute paths in the spec, but macros. hence all occurrences of "/usr" should be replaced by "%{_prefix}", "/usr/bin/" by "%_bindir" and "/usr/share/" by "%{_datadir}" - /usr/share/deco is not owned by anyone And just as a mater of curiosity: wouldn't it be simpler to use "%{_datadir}/deco/*" (or even "%{_datadir}/%{name}") in %files, instead of listing all individual components ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 10:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443375] Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281042.m3SAg22V009681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-openhpi - Python interface for OpenHPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443375 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-04-28 06:42 EST ------- imported and built in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 11:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444426] New: Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444426 Summary: Review Request: gabedit - GUI for computational chemistry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/gabedit.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/gabedit-2.1.4-1.src.rpm Description: Gabedit is a Graphical User Interface to Gamess-US, Gaussian, Molcas, Molpro and MPQC computational chemistry packages. Gabedit includes graphical facilities for generating keywords and options, molecule specifications and their input sections for even the most advanced calculation types. Gabedit includes an advanced Molecule Builder. You can use it to rapidly sketch in molecules and examine them in three dimensions. You can build molecules by atom, ring, group, amino acid and nucleoside. You can also read geometry from a file. Most major molecular file formats are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 11:31:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] New: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cmigrep.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files Quite a complex build process to end up with just a single executable! However it's a very useful executable, allowing you to grep inside OCaml *.cmi files. I didn't yet package up the emacs extension. rpmlint: ocaml-cmigrep.src:58: E: configure-without-libdir-spec (OK because it's not autoconf-generated configure) files: /usr/bin/cmigrep /usr/share/doc/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5 /usr/share/doc/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5/GPL /usr/share/doc/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5/README /usr/share/doc/ocaml-cmigrep-1.5/cmigrep.el Requires & provides are pretty ordinary because this is just a single binary. requires: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpcre.so.0 provides: ocaml-cmigrep = 1.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 11:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281133.m3SBXmkv020082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-28 07:33 EST ------- Some example usages: $ cmigrep -c SO_ Unix SO_DEBUG (* socket_bool_option *) SO_BROADCAST (* socket_bool_option *) SO_REUSEADDR (* socket_bool_option *) SO_KEEPALIVE (* socket_bool_option *) SO_DONTROUTE (* socket_bool_option *) SO_OOBINLINE (* socket_bool_option *) SO_ACCEPTCONN (* socket_bool_option *) SO_SNDBUF (* socket_int_option *) SO_RCVBUF (* socket_int_option *) SO_ERROR (* socket_int_option *) SO_TYPE (* socket_int_option *) SO_RCVLOWAT (* socket_int_option *) SO_SNDLOWAT (* socket_int_option *) SO_LINGER (* socket_optint_option *) SO_RCVTIMEO (* socket_float_option *) SO_SNDTIMEO (* socket_float_option *) $ cmigrep -a '.*map.*' List val map : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a list -> 'b list val rev_map : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a list -> 'b list val map2 : ('a -> 'b -> 'c) -> 'a list -> 'b list -> 'c list val rev_map2 : ('a -> 'b -> 'c) -> 'a list -> 'b list -> 'c list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 11:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:49:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281149.m3SBnhT5022839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://homepage.mac.com/leta | |ris/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 11:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444428] Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281154.m3SBsDmD023683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cmigrep - Search OCaml compiled interface (cmi) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-04-28 07:54 EST ------- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=585565 Breaks on ppc64 at the moment because we need to add the ppc64 build patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 12:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281239.m3SCdP79000982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-04-28 08:39 EST ------- Okay, a new SRPM for scala 2.7.0. It no longer contains the reference documentation and tool support as those are being split into new source packages. http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala.spec http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala-2.7.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Regarding issues raised above (In reply to comment #25) > For 2.6.1-8: > > * Pre-rebuilt binaries > - To make it sure that all files to be installed are > built from free and legally compatible sources, > remove _all_ pre-rebuilt binaries first at %prep like I cannot do this because I need the bootstrap environment > * Legal issue > - Would you explain how the following files are used to > build scala rpm? > ----------------------------------------------------------- > src/library/scala/collection/immutable/Tree.scala in Source0 > ----------------------------------------------------------- I have changed the license tag to BSD and LGPLv2+, is that okay? I will also ask upstream about what the intent is there. > * Timestamps > - Please recheck that "-p" option is correctly used when using "cp" > or "install" commands to install files. For example, fixed > * man file > - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. fixed > * License document > - For example, emacs-scala can be installed without scala itself. > In this case, no license text of scala is installed, which is > undesirable. > i.e. All subpackages which don't require ant either directly or > indirectly should also have license text as %doc. fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 13:13:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281313.m3SDDc0k008848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-28 09:13 EST ------- Builds fine in mock. [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-9-i386/result/geoclue-*.rpm geoclue-devel.i386: W: no-documentation geoclue-gui.i386: W: no-documentation Both of which are ignorable warnings. package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file legibility: outstanding upstream sources: ok buildable: yes excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok content: permissible documentation: the api docs should be moved to the -devel package headers: ok static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: ok shared libraries: ok devel package: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved, but please move the api docs to the -devel package. I'll also note that the first attemot to run the test gui yields a segfault for me, the second run succeeds. Something to look into... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 13:21:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444094] Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281321.m3SDLL4v010478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-legacy-backgrounds - Desktop backgrounds for older releases of Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444094 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-04-28 09:21 EST ------- Fedora branding shouldn't be spread across multiple packages. A lot of work has went into the last couple of releases for consolidating all the branding in a single fedora-logos package. More details at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureGenericLogos Introducing new packages with the logos would make rebranding more difficult and negate the work already done. What you should do is probably post to fedora-art list and get non branded backgrounds from previous releases and then package it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281403.m3SE3H0o018818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:02:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281402.m3SE2S9P019729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:02 EST ------- SRPM url is a 404, please check your files (I don't see any SRPMs in that directory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281406.m3SE6lk6020682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-28 10:06 EST ------- I've move the api docs out to the devel rpm. SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/geoclue-0.11.1-4.fc9.src.rpm I'm seeing the same issues with the test gui as well, I've filed an upstream bug. b.f.o bug # 15745 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:11:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281411.m3SEBS5r020665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:11 EST ------- My bad. The web server was rebuilt over the weekend and the SRPMs weren't restored. They're there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441027] Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281412.m3SECkvF021539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openoffice.org-ooolatex - Support for embedded LaTeX in Impress/Writer documents Alias: ooolatex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441027 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281422.m3SEM8EC022912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:22 EST ------- I've already set the approval flag, so you can proceed and request cvs now, unless you need sponsorship, in which case I cannot help :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281421.m3SELmGV022860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:21 EST ------- Looking through this one now, but I already see one missing item: The Ruby Guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby) say: Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on with a line like Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 Ruby packages must require ruby at build time with a BuildRequires: ruby, and may indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:23:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281423.m3SENIcZ023762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:23 EST ------- ... and: The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package must be the Gem's version. Perhaps you should look through Packaging/Ruby and put up another SRPM? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281424.m3SEOcLW023287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-28 10:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > (In reply to comment #25) > > For 2.6.1-8: > > > > * Pre-rebuilt binaries > > - To make it sure that all files to be installed are > > built from free and legally compatible sources, > > remove _all_ pre-rebuilt binaries first at %prep like > > I cannot do this because I need the bootstrap environment Sorry but this is a blocker: the section "Pre-built JAR files / Other bundled software" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java . If you really need pre-built binaries, please ask fedora-packaging mailing list: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging For now we cannot approve this situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281431.m3SEVDvh025645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-28 10:31 EST ------- Please at lease change the release number every time you change your spec/srpm because - reviewers and some other people watching a review request usually saves old srpms and check diffs - changing srpm withour EVR (epoch-version-release) simply causes confusion And please write the URLs of spec/srpm here from which we can directly download them by "wget -N", for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281434.m3SEY7r5025895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 ------- Additional Comments From smilner at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:34 EST ------- I've uploaded an updates spec/srpm fixing the issues found ... Spec URL: http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/deco.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stevemilner.org/tmp/deco-0.8.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281443.m3SEh9Pb027896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:43 EST ------- I've redone the spec file and believe it's now comforming to the Fedora guide. I've done this across all three ruby gems I've submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:49:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281449.m3SEnoIT028961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:49 EST ------- In general, it is good form to bump the release and add a changelog entry when making changes, even during the review process. This way, reviewers can more easily track progress. :) No worries on this one, but you might want to update the other pending packages appropriately with new SRPMs and bugzilla mentions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 14:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281457.m3SEvpNc030836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-04-28 10:57 EST ------- I've updated the release for each of them, and added an entry in the change log for each mentioning that they were updated to comply with the packaging guidelines. Do I need to also update the URLs in the review requests as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281510.m3SFAFfg001604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 11:10 EST ------- Yes, it is generally accepted that when spec/srpm changes, you should add a bz post of the format: Fixed issue foo, bar, baz. New SRPM: http://foo.bar.com/baz.src.rpm New SPEC: http://foo.bar.com/baz.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281524.m3SFO0qx004446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 ------- Additional Comments From seefeld at sympatico.ca 2008-04-28 11:24 EST ------- The current snapshot srpm is http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/synopsis-2008-28-04-1.src.rpm. If all goes well this may turn into the Synopsis 0.11 release. Otherwise I'll start incrementing $release for subsequent srpm submissions. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439262] Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281542.m3SFgwak008686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439262 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-28 11:42 EST ------- OK, apparently swing-layout is already in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:46:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281546.m3SFkNqO009857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From ihok at hotmail.com 2008-04-28 11:46 EST ------- I was going to test Mat's packages but then I hit bug #444477. Meh. Mat, could you put up a binary x86-64 RPM of EPIC? (And any runtime requirements?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281546.m3SFkpJd009969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-04-28 11:46 EST ------- I have already asked on fedora-packaging about approval for the bootstrap environment. Here is the thread root: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-January/msg00074.html It didn't really go anywhere though, maybe I just need to ask again. I did get the feeling that it'd be easier if the review were completed except for the pre-built binary issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281546.m3SFkwxj009998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 11:46 EST ------- rpmlint says: rubygem-activeldap.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 39, tab: line 7) rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/about 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/process/inspector 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/plugin 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/public/dispatch.cgi 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/groupls 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/usermod-binary-add 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/usermod-binary-add-time 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/groupdel 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/process/spawner 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/useradd-binary 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/usermod-lang-add 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/process/reaper 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/usermod 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/ouadd 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/groupmod 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/performance/benchmarker 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/lib/active_ldap.rb 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/console 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/performance/request 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/public/favicon.ico rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/lpasswd 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/server 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/usermod-binary-del 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/destroy 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/test/run-test.rb 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/public/.htaccess rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/test/run-test.sh 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/public/dispatch.fcgi 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/groupadd 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/generate 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/public/dispatch.rb 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/userdel 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/public/stylesheets/welcome.css rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/performance/profiler 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/useradd 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/al-admin/script/runner 0644 rubygem-activeldap.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activeldap-0.10.0/examples/userls 0644 Can you take a shot at resolving those errors? Should be as easy as deleting the 0 length files (and the .htaccess file) and running chmod +x on the scripts. I'm less concerned about the spaces vs tabs, but while you're in there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442693] Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281551.m3SFpghZ011061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 15:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281557.m3SFvFhO012195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-28 11:57 EST ------- This has a dependency on java-rpmbuild that isn't in Fedora, I think we ran into that somewhere else? But we need javahelp2, so I'll take a look at #439263 first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:06:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438039] Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281606.m3SG69YB014638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438039 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-04-28 12:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: GMT-coastlines Short Description: Coastline data for GMT Owners: orion Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438039] Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281618.m3SGIEp7016260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT-coastlines - Coastline data for GMT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438039 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 12:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439263] Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281620.m3SGKnhJ017069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: javahelp2 - needed for NetBeans Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439263 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-28 12:20 EST ------- Jaroslav, do you think you could add an initial %changelog and tweak the dependencies? As an aside I'd like to see Fedora do the %changelog generation too, nice to hear Mandriva does it, but for now we require %changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281621.m3SGLpU3017915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:21:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281621.m3SGL5ij017807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-28 12:21 EST ------- I will ask spot. Spot, would you look at this srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281625.m3SGPVG0018033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2008-04-28 12:25 EST ------- Thanks for the remarks. I'll update it one of the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281648.m3SGmKpH022876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-28 12:48 EST ------- Package Name: sugar-journal Short Description: Journal Activity for the sugar desktop Owners: ausil Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444158] Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281648.m3SGmZpm022934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-journal - Journal activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444158 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-04-28 12:48 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444223] Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281657.m3SGvDtJ024832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-28 12:57 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:56:58 -0400 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_444224=5D_Review_Request=3A_samcoupe-rom_-?= =?iso-8859-1?q?_SAM_Coup=C3=A9_=28Spectrum_compatible_homecomputer?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=29_ROM_file?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281656.m3SGuw2J024702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-28 12:56 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281657.m3SGvELH024856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 Bug 444225 depends on bug 444223, which changed state. Bug 444223 Summary: Review Request: SAASound - Phillips SAA 1099 sound chip emulator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444223 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281656.m3SGux5G024727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 Bug 444225 depends on bug 444224, which changed state. Bug 444224 Summary: Review Request: samcoupe-rom - SAM Coup? (Spectrum compatible homecomputer) ROM file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434827] Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281655.m3SGtqpD024409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434827 loganjerry at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-04-28 12:55 EST ------- Does this supercede bug 252114? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:57:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444225] Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281657.m3SGv84e024615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: simcoupe - SAM Coupe emulator (spectrum compatible) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444225 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-28 12:57 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 16:59:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439744] Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281659.m3SGxRUf025153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubberband - Audio time-stretching and pitch-shifting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439744 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-04-28 12:59 EST ------- Ping Michel, can this please be pushed to stabel updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 17:02:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281702.m3SH2rJ9025787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-04-28 13:02 EST ------- I've modified the spec to set executable all scripts and to delete the 0-length files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 17:10:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252114] Review Request: jcommon - Common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281710.m3SHAYRm027703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - Common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252114 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-28 13:10 EST ------- I don't think Vivek is going to have time to update this. If you'd like to submit a new review request from yourself, Jerry, that might be best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 17:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281713.m3SHDOl4028423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-04-28 13:13 EST ------- You can simplify that %define installroot like this: %define installroot %{buildroot}%{geminstdir} Also, please move those macro defines to the top. It helps the spec stay clean for others, who may not be expecting new macro defines in the middle of the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 17:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252114] Review Request: jcommon - Common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281723.m3SHNgBs030467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - Common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252114 ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-04-28 13:23 EST ------- I can do that, but what about bug 434827? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 17:47:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281747.m3SHlUCw003254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-04-28 13:47 EST ------- Aufter contacting upstream, I was able to integrate a patch which allow parallel builds for kaya. Updates files are uploaded on: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.4.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 18:11:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281811.m3SIBgW1008003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From giomac at gmail.com 2008-04-28 14:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304019) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304019&action=view) Updated SPEC file, works for me, only header changed Try this one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 18:38:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442692] Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281838.m3SIcZwi013165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gypsy - GPS multiplexing daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442692 ------- Additional Comments From pbrobinson at gmail.com 2008-04-28 14:38 EST ------- Updated and cleaned some of the spec SPEC: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gypsy.spec SRPM: http://fedora.roving-it.com/rawhide/gypsy-0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 18:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281846.m3SIk9eK015150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 18:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281853.m3SIrHif016365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-28 14:53 EST ------- Unfortunately that package doesn't build for me; things progress for a while, and then: ../compiler/kayac Set.k -noprelude -nochase -noenvlibs -I../rts -I./../rts -nortchecks -L ../rts_opt -L ../rts -xmldocs -L . -L ./../rts -deprfail ../compiler/kayac Lazy.k -noprelude -nochase -noenvlibs -I../rts -I./../rts -nortchecks -L ../rts_opt -L ../rts -xmldocs -L . -L ./../rts -deprfail ../compiler/kayac Queue.k -noprelude -nochase -noenvlibs -I../rts -I./../rts -nortchecks -L ../rts_opt -L ../rts -xmldocs -L . -L ./../rts -deprfail ../compiler/kayac Reflect.k -noprelude -nochase -noenvlibs -I../rts -I./../rts -nortchecks -L ../rts_opt -L ../rts -xmldocs -L . -L ./../rts -deprfail ../compiler/kayac Strings.k -noprelude -nochase -noenvlibs -I../rts -I./../rts -nortchecks -L ../rts_opt -L ../rts -xmldocs -L . -L ./../rts -deprfail ../compiler/kayac Parse.k -noprelude -nochase -noenvlibs -I../rts -I./../rts -nortchecks -L ../rts_opt -L ../rts -xmldocs -L . -L ./../rts -deprfail Parse.k:515:Can't find module Strings make[1]: *** [Parse.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... I guess something that needs the Strings module is building before Strings.k finishes compiling. I'm building on a 8-core machine; you might not see this with less parallelism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 18:55:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281855.m3SItv0N016948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-28 14:55 EST ------- I'm not sure why you don't just follow the stalled review policy and work towards getting these tickets closed instead of returning them to the queue where someone else will have to spend time going through the same process. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436677] Review Request: xxdiff In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281914.m3SJEh6l020561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xxdiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436677 ------- Additional Comments From cattelan at xfs.org 2008-04-28 15:14 EST ------- Ok finally got the magic find worked out to remove the #! Turns out svnforeign.py turns into svn-foreign so can't just process *.py. Anyways updated xxdiff.spec and src.rpm http://xfs.org/~cattelan/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:19:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 286851] Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281919.m3SJJOUc021554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-04-28 15:19 EST ------- I was able to fix your reported issue. Updates files can be downloaded from: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.4.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443248] Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281922.m3SJM78b022410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeldap - LDAP APIs for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443248 ------- Additional Comments From dpierce at redhat.com 2008-04-28 15:22 EST ------- Done. I've updated the spec to move all macros to the top, and simplified the installroot definition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434827] Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281931.m3SJVuem025633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434827 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-04-28 15:31 EST ------- caolanm->jerry: I have a interest in getting jfreereport and its dependencies into fedora by F-10, but I'm not super interested in maintaining it :-) Though I will if I have to. I wasn't aware of bug 252114, but it doesn't look like its moving pretty fast either. Feel free to mark one as a duplicate of the other. The above spec is pre the java guideline finalization so I haven't checked if it needs to be resynced to pass the new final guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281947.m3SJllEk027615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 mike at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mike at flyn.org 2008-04-28 15:47 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mt-daapd New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:48:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444511] New: Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444511 Summary: Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/emma.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/emma-2.0-0.5312.2jpp.1.fc8.src.rpm Description: EMMA is an open-source toolkit for measuring and reporting Java code coverage. EMMA distinguishes itself from other tools by going after a unique feature combination: support for large-scale enterprise software development while keeping individual developer's work fast and iterative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444512] New: Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/eclipse-eclemma-1.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: EclEmma is a Java code coverage tool for Eclipse based on the EMMA Java code coverage tool. Features include launching from within the IDE, coverage analysis summaries, and highlighting in Java source code editors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444512] Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281953.m3SJrhSf030666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-eclemma - EMMA plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444512 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |444511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 19:53:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444511] Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804281953.m3SJriYT030687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emma - Java code coverage tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444511 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |444512 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 20:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282014.m3SKEFxH000338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-28 16:14 EST ------- The crename and symlinktarget C programs do the same than rename (util-linux-ng) and readlink (coreutils). So I'd suggest using those directly. Another issue is that %{_datadir} is not used, instead %{_prefix}/share is used. There are many ways to fix that. The cleanest would certainly be to add a makefile variable for PREFIX/share and substitute is in deco.in, especially if you can submit such patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 20:44:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282044.m3SKimXb008550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-04-28 16:44 EST ------- This new package does build for me. I wonder about these bits from the configure output: Checking for PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) support ... not found. Disabling PAM support Checking for LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) support ... not found. Disabling LDAP support Is it worth adding build dependencies on pam-devel and openldap-devel? I can't say what functionality is missing but generally in Fedora we enable pam and ldap support for most programs. Looks like /usr/bin/gs is the PostScript RIP to use. WARNING, /usr/bin/gs does not seem to be an executable program; you may need to correct this before starting up the fax server. ls: cannot access /usr/bin/gs: No such file or directory ./configure: line 4180: /usr/bin/gs: No such file or directory Does this really matter, since it was explicitly directed to use /usr/bin/gs? Or does a build dependency ghostscript need to be added? There are similar complaints about sendmail and mgetty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 20:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282059.m3SKxT4x011248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-04-28 16:59 EST ------- Thanks. That's probably a good thing -- now that Rawhide == future F-10, it's a bit hard to build against -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 21:19:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282119.m3SLJ2Mq014988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-28 17:19 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=304046) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=304046&action=view) Variables View Screenshot Sorry guys, yes PadWalker should be required. I must have already had it installed. It's a bit concerning you can't see any variables even after installing it. I've attached an example screenshot of what you should be seeing. > - there are lots of antlr warnings - do you think these are okay? To be honest, I don't really know what half of those antlr warnings even mean since grammar parsing is not something I've ever done myself. Everything seems to work ok though, so my philosophy on this has been "warnings are not errors." :-) I will post links to binary rpms in a minute for you Jack, maybe you can have a quick check to see if there is anything obviously wrong with the syntax highlighting, auto-completion and what have you. > - are there any unit tests for EPIC which we can use to verify the JDOM API changes? I don't think so, upstream admits his test suite is "very incomplete." However, if you add paths to your project's Perl Include Path property sheet, it correctly saves an xml .includepath settings file in your project directory and is able to find external Perl modules using it. This is only place where the code I've patched is used. > - any idea what's going on with the debuginfo extraction? I get lots of > the following. I'm not super-concerned, since this is gcj debuginfo > and the chances of anyone other than gcj developers being able to use > it successfully is low :) This one I'm not sure about. I just added the gcj lines that the guidelines told me to add in, so I figured it was normal. Would it be worth asking someone who knows a bit more about it to see if it's a problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 21:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226328] Merge Review: pwlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282152.m3SLqcrn021011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pwlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226328 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 21:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:52:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282152.m3SLqqfT021032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: opal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pbrobinson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 22:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438043] Review Request: GMT - Generic Mapping Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282233.m3SMXBYd028307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GMT - Generic Mapping Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438043 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-28 18:33 EST ------- Could it be possible to have the doc package submitted in parallel? I agree that it is a good idea to have a separate doc package, to have a noarch package. You should look at my package for the removal of a non-free file. I find the octave patch a bit strange, since it uses matlab support. Could it be possible to have it additionally, such that it can be submitted upstream? Your octave packaging is not the same than the one proposed at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Octave but at that page there are mistakes. There is no soname in the shared libs. Do you really want to ship them? I think it is very wrong. The octave define at the beginning should be ameliorated, I get, without octave-devel: $ rpmbuild -ba GMT.spec sh: octave-config: command not found sh: octave-config: command not found sh: octave-config: command not found sh: octave-config: command not found sh: octave-config: command not found sh: octave-config: command not found sh: octave-config: command not found error: Failed build dependencies: octave-devel is needed by GMT-4.2.1-2.i386 I propose to have xgridedit in a separate package, to avoid depending on the X libs. less is detected at build time and used in the GMT script at runtime. There are many config files in %_datadir that cannot be overriden by the user. They should be in %_sysconfdir and marked %config(noreplace). The coresponding code in my spec is: %define gmthome %{_datadir}/GMT %define gmtconf %{_sysconfdir}/GMT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gmtconf}/{mgg,dbase,mgd77,conf} pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gmthome}/ # remove unneeded file rm conf/gmt.conf.orig # put conf files in %{gmtconf} and do links in %{gmthome} for file in conf/*.conf mgg/gmtfile_paths dbase/grdraster.info \ mgd77/mgd77_paths.txt; do mv $file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gmtconf}/$file # absolute links # ln -s %{gmtconf}/$file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gmthome}/$file # relative link ln -s ../../../../../%{gmtconf}/$file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gmthome}/$file done popd %dir %{gmtconf} %dir %{gmtconf}/mgg %dir %{gmtconf}/dbase %dir %{gmtconf}/mgd77 %dir %{gmtconf}/conf %config(noreplace) %{gmtconf}/conf/*.conf %config(noreplace) %{gmtconf}/mgg/gmtfile_paths %config(noreplace) %{gmtconf}/dbase/grdraster.info %config(noreplace) %{gmtconf}/mgd77/mgd77_paths.txt Also I have a sed substitution to correct the doc path in the GMT command. The doc path may be different in your package, but you could adapt: -e 's:\${prefix}/www/gmt/gmt_services.html:%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/gmt_services.html:' src/GMT I suggest adding INSTALL='install -p' to the make install command to keep timestamps as much as possible. Also during install, cp is called as cp -r for installation of data. I would suggest either substituting cp -r to cp -pr, redoing the install or doing a patch for the Makefile to keep timestamps. I suggest doing in %prep: chmod a-x src/ps2raster.c src/mgd77/mgd77sniffer.c pslib is a badly choosed name, it could interfere with other library names. I did: # rename the pslib man page mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man3/pslib.3 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man3/GMT_pslib.3 The examples should certainly be %doc, even if they are in a separate package, since they are really %doc, and we don't want them to be installed if docs are excluded. The html docs should be in the main package, they are very small. The src/*/README.* should also be in %doc. I think that it would be better to have a %dist tag. I think that the examples should have a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} such that there cannot be any mismatch which could cause the examples to fail. I propose adding to main package %doc gmt_bench-marks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 22:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439265] Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282239.m3SMdVfZ026948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnb-platform7 - NetBeans Platform 6.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439265 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-04-28 18:39 EST ------- Hi Jaroslav, I noticed that you've also submitted this to JPackage: https://www.jpackage.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197 We should probably do the fixes there and then once it's done synchronize with Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Apr 28 22:39:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240008] Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804282239.m3SMdkdk026993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-shadow - ruby bindings for shadow password access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240008 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From k.georgiou at imperial.ac.uk 2008-04-28 18:39 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ruby-shadow New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 00:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290046.m3T0kLIr018595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-28 20:46 EST ------- I've added the PadWalker dependency and I also noticed the source plugin wasn't being built properly, so I've fixed that too. New SPEC and SRPM are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/misc/fedora/eclipse-epic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/misc/fedora/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-4.fc9.src.rpm (Binaries:) http://www.matbooth.co.uk/misc/fedora/brazil-2.3-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm http://www.matbooth.co.uk/misc/fedora/eclipse-epic-0.6.22-4.fc9.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 00:58:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290058.m3T0wJ4u017469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 bogado at bogado.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp |bogado at bogado.net Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 01:42:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254057] Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290142.m3T1gZYf027967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254057 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 21:42 EST ------- I would be happy to review this. Look for a full review here in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 01:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254057] Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290157.m3T1vSlm027624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-docs - Dcumentation for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254057 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 21:57 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT with advertising) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. As with all the e16 packages, you might ping upstream to relicence to a more friendly license. Has there been any response so far? 2. rpmlint says: e16-docs.noarch: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising e16-docs.src: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising 3. Is the only reason this package Requires e16 for the /usr/share/e16 directory? If so, perhaps move it to a /usr/share/e16-docs/ dir and remove the Requires? 4. This package ships with 2 fonts, can you just Require a needed font package for those? Or are those specific fonts needed? /usr/share/e16/E-docs/Vera.ttf /usr/share/e16/E-docs/VeraBd.ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 02:04:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254058] Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290204.m3T24AAf031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254058 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 22:04 EST ------- I would be happy to review this package. Look for a full review here in a few. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 02:15:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254058] Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290215.m3T2FURX001556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: e16-themes - Themes for Enlightenment, DR16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254058 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 22:15 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT with advertising) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 20fbaff803c3decdf3ac7c363b37c42e e16-themes-0.16.8.0.2.tar.gz 20fbaff803c3decdf3ac7c363b37c42e e16-themes-0.16.8.0.2.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. As per usual, you might ask upstream to relicense. ;) 2. rpmlint says: e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/BlueSteel/slideouts/slideouts.cfg e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/BlueSteel/buttons/buttons.cfg e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/BrushedMetal-Tigert/buttons/buttons.cfg e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/BrushedMetal-Tigert/slideouts/slideouts.cfg e16-themes.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/e16/themes/BlueSteel/sound/sound.cfg I am guessing that these zero-length files are needed? If not, it would be nice not to ship them... can you confirm? e16-themes.noarch: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising e16-themes.src: W: invalid-license MIT with advertising Ignore. None of those are really blockers. If you can check on the zero-length files and ping upstream before importing that would be great. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 02:36:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290236.m3T2aDxb003030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-28 22:36 EST ------- Sorry for the delay here... ;( 1-5 look good. 6. You aren't stopping the service in preun, you might want to do that? 7. rpmlint now looks much better: gfs2-utils.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/gfs2 gfs2-utils.x86_64: E: missing-mandatory-lsb-keyword Description in /etc/init.d/gfs2 gfs2-utils.x86_64: E: missing-mandatory-lsb-keyword Short-Description in /etc/init.d/gfs2 gfs2-utils.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name gfs2 So, I don't see any further blocker issues here. You might look at item 6 again, but otherwise things look good. This package is APPROVED. Feel free to close this bug RAWHIDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 02:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290256.m3T2udBK010417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-28 22:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > > - there are lots of antlr warnings - do you think these are okay? > > To be honest, I don't really know what half of those antlr warnings even mean > since grammar parsing is not something I've ever done myself. Everything seems > to work ok though, so my philosophy on this has been "warnings are not errors." > :-) That's fine by me :) > > - are there any unit tests for EPIC which we can use to verify the JDOM API > changes? > > I don't think so, upstream admits his test suite is "very incomplete." However, > if you add paths to your project's Perl Include Path property sheet, it > correctly saves an xml .includepath settings file in your project directory and > is able to find external Perl modules using it. This is only place where the > code I've patched is used. That works for me. > > - any idea what's going on with the debuginfo extraction? I get lots of > > the following. I'm not super-concerned, since this is gcj debuginfo > > and the chances of anyone other than gcj developers being able to use > > it successfully is low :) > > This one I'm not sure about. I just added the gcj lines that the guidelines > told me to add in, so I figured it was normal. Would it be worth asking someone > who knows a bit more about it to see if it's a problem? I think this might be: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-November/msg01948.html which I'm probably seeing more so because I'm building on an F8 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 03:07:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290307.m3T3740w012807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 overholt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-04-28 23:07 EST ------- Okay, I'm content to say that it's my system (F8 with lots of odd Eclipse stuff on it) that's causing my missing-variables-in-debug-perspective issue if you can see them. If we run into issues, we can fix them later. This package is APPROVED. Thanks, Mat! Don't forget to take EPIC off the Packaging/Wishlist on the Fedora wiki :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 04:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290409.m3T49DdQ020916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com 2008-04-29 00:09 EST ------- PAM and LDAP support in HylaFAX enable authentication mechanisms for the hfaxd protocol that are alternatives to the etc/hosts.hfaxd file-based authentication method. Sure, pam-devel and openldap-devel should probably be build dependencies. The WARNING regarding /usr/bin/gs can be ignored. It's an installation dependency and not a build dependency. Furthermore, the configure-determined value is not built-in to binaries and can be configured by the administrator. Same goes for sendmail as for ghostscript. And mgetty is entirely optional. SPEC: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec SRPM: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 04:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436894] Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290415.m3T4FGo3022392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: universalindentgui - Gui for Reformatting Source https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436894 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-04-29 00:15 EST ------- Sure. Will start stalled review process. Will wait for another week for any update so that once a month gets completed as per given in StalledReviews wiki page, I will close this review as NOTABUG and mark this as FE-DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 05:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440373] Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290555.m3T5tJw4006487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smc-fonts - malayalam opentype fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440373 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 06:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290631.m3T6VVbC012539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-29 02:31 EST ------- (For review request please leave assignee to the reviewer. Just changing assignee) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 06:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290631.m3T6VtCr015490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bogado at bogado.net |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290823.m3T8NN7j000467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-29 04:23 EST ------- Patrice - I've put you as a co-maintainer, but I just realized that you wrote "I am ok to be in initialCC and commit messages." - does that mean you don't want to be a co-maintainer for this package? I hope I can convince you to remain as a co-maintainer. jindrich - I added you as a co-maintainer - shout if you don't want to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290821.m3T8L1it003555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-04-29 04:21 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dvipdfm Short Description: A DVI to PDF converter Owners: jgu pertusus jnovy Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:33:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290833.m3T8XGiG002348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2008-04-29 04:33 EST ------- Update spec file and srpm is available at http://bart.ulyssis.org/fedora/php-suhosin/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290832.m3T8W526002157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-29 04:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Okay, I'm content to say that it's my system (F8 with lots of odd Eclipse stuff > on it) that's causing my missing-variables-in-debug-perspective issue if you can > see them. If we run into issues, we can fix them later. > > This package is APPROVED. Thanks, Mat! Don't forget to take EPIC off the > Packaging/Wishlist on the Fedora wiki :) Will do, cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290834.m3T8YoAD002554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 fedora at matbooth.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-04-29 04:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-epic Short Description: Perl Eclipse plugin Owners: mbooth Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290844.m3T8ijnT007436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 ------- Additional Comments From swhiteho at redhat.com 2008-04-29 04:44 EST ------- I added the Requires(preun): /sbin/service line as you'd suggested so what else do I need to do in order to satisfy item 6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 08:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804290852.m3T8q5mb005622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-04-29 04:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Patrice - I've put you as a co-maintainer, but I just realized that you wrote "I > am ok to be in initialCC and commit messages." - does that mean you don't want > to be a co-maintainer for this package? It indeed means that I agree to be co-maintainer. But to me when cvsextra people can commit and I am in intialCC and commit messages I consider to have the needed rights for a co-maintainer, since I think it is the primary maintainer duty to use his approveacls power. But I don't mind having full powers either... > I hope I can convince you to remain as a > co-maintainer. I am convinced ;-) > jindrich - I added you as a co-maintainer - shout if you don't want to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 09:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] New: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: natureshadow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pidgin-lastfm.naturalnet.de/download/rpm/pidgin-lastfm.spec SRPM URL: http://pidgin-lastfm.naturalnet.de/download/rpm/pidgin-lastfm-0.3a-1.src.rpm Description: This plugin for the Pidgin multi-protocol instant messenger displays information from a user's Last.fm profile in the status message. The most important information might be the most recently scrobbled song. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 10:13:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291013.m3TADIKt023081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 natureshadow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 10:45:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441072] Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291045.m3TAjCCW028459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwiid - Library and tools for comunicating with a wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441072 ------- Additional Comments From bogado at bogado.net 2008-04-29 06:45 EST ------- Ops, sorry, didn't know this rule. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 11:43:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437667] Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291143.m3TBhMD8003598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfm - A DVI to PDF converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437667 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-04-29 07:43 EST ------- Ok, just writing a comment to let you know I have this on the radar :) Feel free to propose what needs to be done on the texlive side/mostly when is the right time to remove dvipdfm from texlive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 11:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291155.m3TBtGQs009110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-04-29 07:55 EST ------- Mat: I'd appreciate this in F-8. If you have a reason not to maintain it there, I'd gladly do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:40:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436637] Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291240.m3TCe43i019293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disktype - Detect the content format of a disk or disk image https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436637 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-04-29 08:40 EST ------- Seems good to me. However I wonder if we can move disktype to sbindir instead of bindir: from the disttype man: ". Note that running disktype on device files like your hard disk will likely require root rights." We usually move this kind of app to sbindir Note that the libewf patch expect libewf header to be in /usr/local/include/libewf.h It is currenly available in /usr/include which is the default path, so it won't hurt. But the nicest tweak would be to use pkg-config libewf cflags and pkg-config libewf --libs (for the libs side). This would lead to have : in the %prep section -------------------- sed -i -e 's|-I/usr/local/include|%(pkg-config libewf --cflags)|' Makefile sed -i -e 's|-L/usr/local/lib||' Makefile sed -i -e 's|-lewf|%(pkg-config libewf --libs)|' Makefile -------------------- Note that the current version in F-9 will not handle this nicely as openssl-devel is missing from libewf-devel (you may need to add it from disktype, but i think it won't be required - I've asked libewf upstream to sort this and i guess it will be removed on the next libewf bugfix update planned for the end of the weak). (This problem was my bad - sorry - for now it is safe to handle the way you do until libewf is fixed - it won't be possible to link to the F-8 version anyway as BSD advertissing close remains present). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 12:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291243.m3TChmBn019942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-04-29 08:43 EST ------- Before spot comments on this: Build itself failed (check root.log) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=586180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 14:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444601] New: Review Request: pem - Pem is personal expenses manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444601 Summary: Review Request: pem - Pem is personal expenses manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/pem.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/pem-0.7.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Pem, is personal expenses manager. Pem lets keep track of personal income and expense in an extremely elegant manner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Apr 29 14:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225792] Merge Review: gfs2-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200804291439.m3TEd02r006617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gfs2-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225792 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-04-29 10:39 EST ------- Simply make your preun: %preun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/service gfs2 stop >/dev/null 2>&1 /sbin/chkconfig --del