[Bug 440211] Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 3 14:46:28 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: latex2emf - Create an EMF file from LaTeX source


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440211


michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |michel.sylvan at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com  2008-04-03 10:46 EST -------
Package meets naming and packaging guidelines: YES
 - Spec file matches base package name.: YES
 - Spec has consistent macro usage.  YES
 - Meets Packaging Guidelines. YES
 - License: GPLv2+
 - License field in spec matches: YES
 - License file included in package: YES
 - Spec in American English: YES
 - Spec is legible.: YES
 - Sources match upstream md5sum:
MD5(OOoLatexEmf_noarch_src.tar.gz)= ad1ab04077828e91a4df906a850bc013
 - Package needs ExcludeArch: NO
 - BuildRequires correct: YES (builds correctly in koji/mock, see under SHOULD
items)
 - Spec handles locales/find_lang: N/A
 - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.:  N/A
 - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.: YES
 - Package has a correct %clean section. YES
 - Package has correct buildroot: YES
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 - Package is code or permissible content: YES
 - Doc subpackage needed/used.: NO
 - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.: YES


 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. YES (F-9, x86_64)
 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES
 - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.  YES
 - Package owns all the directories it creates. N/A
 - rpmlint output.

rpmlint latex2emf-1* : clean


 - final provides and requires are sane (glibc, rpmlib provides removed): yes


SHOULD Items:

 - Should build in mock: YES
 - Should build on all supported archs: YES (see above)
 - Should function as described.  YES: tested on F-9. Works on one source file,
breaks on another: "cannot get font size for  ..." 
 - Should have sane scriptlets. YES
 - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. N/A
 - Should have dist tag  YES
 - Should package latest version YES

Issues:
Breaks on the one file I mentioned; documentation does not specify usage (-bb ?
-transp ?). But these are issues for upstream.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list