[Bug 438126] Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 9 08:28:06 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126





------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de  2008-04-09 04:28 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
>  [x] Rpmlint output:
> source RPM:
> W: patch-not-applied Patch2: konq-plugins-4.0.1-icons.patch
> -> Sebastian ? Should this patch be applied ?

No, it's not needed anymore. I'll remove it.

>  [!] Latest version is packaged.
> not a problem, the package uses svn version 4.0.2, meanwhile 4.0.3 has been
> released. As stated above, I rely on Sebastian to pick the best release to 
be
> shipped in Fedora.

konq-plugins did not get changes for a long time. The script create_tarball.rb 
use the actual verstion of KDE also for the created tarball. At time of 
creation this was 4.0.2.
However, there were some changes in the past days. So I could 
a) update the package and submit the new version for review again
b) import the package and update it after the import


> 1. Not all the plugins are using the same license and they are delivered as
> separate libraries. Therefore I think that the correct license tag 
is "GPLv2+
> and LGPLv2+" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ , "Multiple 
licensing
> situations", answer A3)

Ok. I'll use "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" then.

> 2. The autorefresh plugin has no license specified. IANAL, but I am almost
> certain this has to be clarified before including it in Fedora

I'll try to ping upstream to include a license in autorefresh.* files then. 
But what to to until then? Import it and wait for upstream or wait with the 
import until upstream has fixed this?

> 3. One patch is included in the src.rpm but not applied. Maybe you could 
either
> drop it, use it or add a note mentioning why is it included but not used ?

See above. I'll drop it.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list