[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 28 12:39:25 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867
------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-04-28 08:39 EST -------
Okay, a new SRPM for scala 2.7.0. It no longer contains the reference documentation and tool support
as those are being split into new source packages.
http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala.spec
http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala-2.7.0-1.fc8.src.rpm
Regarding issues raised above
(In reply to comment #25)
> For 2.6.1-8:
>
> * Pre-rebuilt binaries
> - To make it sure that all files to be installed are
> built from free and legally compatible sources,
> remove _all_ pre-rebuilt binaries first at %prep like
I cannot do this because I need the bootstrap environment
> * Legal issue
> - Would you explain how the following files are used to
> build scala rpm?
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> src/library/scala/collection/immutable/Tree.scala in Source0
> -----------------------------------------------------------
I have changed the license tag to BSD and LGPLv2+, is that okay? I will also ask upstream about what
the intent is there.
> * Timestamps
> - Please recheck that "-p" option is correctly used when using "cp"
> or "install" commands to install files. For example,
fixed
> * man file
> - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc.
fixed
> * License document
> - For example, emacs-scala can be installed without scala itself.
> In this case, no license text of scala is installed, which is
> undesirable.
> i.e. All subpackages which don't require ant either directly or
> indirectly should also have license text as %doc.
fixed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list