[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hylafax


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542





------- Additional Comments From faxguy at howardsilvan.com  2008-04-29 00:09 EST -------
PAM and LDAP support in HylaFAX enable authentication mechanisms for the hfaxd
protocol that are alternatives to the etc/hosts.hfaxd file-based authentication
method.  Sure, pam-devel and openldap-devel should probably be build dependencies.

The WARNING regarding /usr/bin/gs can be ignored.  It's an installation
dependency and not a build dependency.  Furthermore, the configure-determined
value is not built-in to binaries and can be configured by the administrator. 
Same goes for sendmail as for ghostscript.  And mgetty is entirely optional.

SPEC: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax.spec
SRPM: http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/hylafax/hylafax-5.2.4-3.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.